Activity allocation reposting issue

Hi gurus,
I allocated maintenance cost to maintenance order using activity type MAINT1 ( allocation cost element MAINT1_ACT , category 43) , now I want to repost the cost to MAINT2 with a different allocation cost element MAINT2_ACT... so it should look like as below on the cost center report:
Dr.  MAINT2_ACT  
CR. MAINT1_ACT
I tried KB65 but it won't update the allocation cost element; I also try to create reposting cycle using KSC5, but I don't know how to add activity type and cost element field on the receiver side. Please help.

Just to reword my question, as it's a bit confusing on the initial question:
Maintenance cost has been allocated to maintenance order using activity type MAINT1 ( allocation cost element MAINT1_ACT , category 43) ,  but business wanted to post to a different allocation cost element. So I created a new activity type MAINT3 with new allocation cost element  MAINT3_ACT, and try to use KB65 to do reposting ( see below ),  but this doesn't seem to have option of updating the receiving allocation cost element, the sending and receiving cost element still pointed to MAINT1_ACT. Idealy, it should empty out the postings on MAINT1_ACT and post to MAINT3_ACT.
I also try to create reposting cycle,  but don't know how to add activity type and cost element field on the receiver side. Please help if you can, thanks!!

Similar Messages

  • Activity Allocation Reposting BAPI

    Hi,
    I would like to run Activity Allocation Reposting using a BAPI. I could not find one in transation BAPI. Does any of you know of such a BAPI?
    Thnx,
    Avihay

    Hi Avihay,
    I believe you can use BAPI_ACC_ACTIVITY_ALLOC_POST (sorry, that's for plain posting, for reposting I'm afraid there is no BAPI, but you can call a transaction).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Modify posting period in KB65 - Internal Activity Allocation reposting

    Hi Gurus,
    I have lots of documents originally created in CATS.
    The user who did the CAT7 transfer made a mistake and put in posting date (01.03.2010) on the selection screen of CAT7. All items have been posted on 01.03.2010 instead of the original date of the records in CATS.
    When I try to repost these items in KB65 and modify the posting date to February, 2010 the system issues an error message (BK214) that the new posting period is earlier than original and it is not possible to modify.
    Message BK214 can't be switched off either.
    Is there any chance to bypass this? Or any other idea how to modify the posting date of these items from March to February?
    Thanks,
    Jeno

    Try KB21n......we used to change the activity allocation through this transaction.....should work in your case
    Thanks
    Assign points if useful

  • BAPI - Enter Indirect Acty Alloc.Reposting

    Hi ABAP Gurus!
    I would like to use a BAPI to create Indirect Activity Allocation Reposting (Transaction KB65).
    Anyone can direct me to a BAPI or do I have to create a BDC?
    Thanks!

    Please see note 368972.
    Rob

  • Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

    Friends,
    I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
    1.Cost Component Structure
    10 – Material
    20 – Labour
    30 – Diesel
    40 – Electricity
    2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
    Labour – 2.0 HR
    Diesel – 1.0 HR
    Electricity – 5.0 HR
    3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
    Like;
    1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
    2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
    3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
    4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
    6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                              13.00                    AED       
    4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
    BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
    Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                              2.67- AED
    Note :- As per my understanding it should be
        Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                    Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                    Electricity Cost                                                1.00
    5.Now after Process Order confirmation
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                              16.00
    6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
    I have configured the system in below manner
    1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
    Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
    For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
          Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
    One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
          Product/Order
    7.Assessment Cycle Details
    Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
    Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
    Start Date 01.01.2014  To  31.10.2014
    Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
    IND- Interactive
    Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
    Sender
    Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
    Cost Element 40204
    Receiver
    Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
    Tracing Factor
    Var.portion type – Actual Activity
    Selaction Criteria
    Activity Type - ELE30
    Receivers Tracing Factor
    Cost Ctr Factor per        100
    CBAKYPDDXB 100
    8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
    After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                    1100.00
    Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
    But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
    When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
    OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                          2200.06
    2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
    After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                              2.67-      542.01
    Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
    I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
    Main issue is
    Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
    Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
    Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
    Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
    Thanks
    Sagar Chinchkar

    Dear Rajneesh,
    I have made the changes as suggested....
    It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
    I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
    Structure Z1
    Splitting structure for AT
    Assignment 10
    Electricity Cost
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    Cost Element
    994215
    Activity Type
    ELE30
    Splitting Rule
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    12
    Activity quantity
    Version 0
    In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
    Order 1 - QTY 2
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1
    Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
    followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
    KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
           QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
           (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
        3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
          Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
    Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
    Total -                    965.57
         4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
         LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10  to 0 
         DIE20 - Actual  confirmed Value 10  to 0
    Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                                  PL     Act     Var
    40002
    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    1005/1100000042
    10.00
    15.00
    50.00
    40015
    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
    1005/4400000074
    26.00-
    26.00-
    994201
    Depriciation Cost
    WMBDDEP01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994202
    Sales & Distribution Cost
    WMBDS&A01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994310
    Labour Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
    4.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994320
    Diesel Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
    10.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994330
    Electricity Cost
    CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
    2.00
    408.06
    20,303.00
    If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
    What setting is required in current system.....
    Million thanks in advance....
    Regards
    Sagar Chinchkar

  • No of. assessment/distribution/reposting/Activity allocation in a month..?

    Hi,
    Pls. let me know how many times we can do cost centre settlement  in a month..
    1. In case of assess
    2. In case of Distribution
    3. Incase of reposting
    4. Incase of Activity allocation.
    Generally I guess we can do it only once.
    Thanks & Regds,
    Kasi.

    Hi Kasi Kancharla
    There is no limit to do all these activities.
    We can do as per our requirements.
    Pl letme know any further information.
    Ramana P

  • PS: Activity Allocation Screen Variant  Display Issue

    I'm having a problem in SAP v5.0 when I create a screen variant for Trans KB21N (Activity Allocation).  The variant is available in the drop down list and works fine during the data entry session, however, when I press the 'Enter' key the system restores the screen variant back to the default variant. This is very disconcerting, am I missing something simple in the config?
    Thanks,
    Dave Flick
    972-821-4211

    I'm answering this post myself because SAP support gave me OSS note 913227 and this corrected the problem.
    Thanks,
    Dave Flick

  • Variable Costs using SKF in Indirect Activity Allocation

    Hello
    I am trying to use indirect activity allocations and KSPI to transfer costs from an activity in an indirect cost center to multiple direct cost centers. The Receiver tracing factor is planned SKF (i.e. number of employees). The issue I have is that when doing this allocation, the variable cost at the indirect cost center gets transferred as a fixed cost to the direct cost centers. We need to have this as a variable cost on the direct cost centers. Can anyone suggest anything or let me know if I'm doing something wrong?
    Here are my sender/receivers:
    Sender:
    Quantities Calculated Inversely
    Plan Values
    Receiver tracing factor:
    variable Portions
    Planned SKF
    No Scaling
    Thank you

    Hi Mark
    I was able to achieve this in the past...as below
    1. On the indirect Cost center - Use an activity type Catg 2 (indirect entry indirect allocation)
    2. On the receiver cost centers - Use an act type Catg 4 (Instead of SKF)
    3. Enter the Plan Act Qty for this Act Type on the receiver direct cost centers in KP26 and Actual Qty in KB51N
    4. In cycle definition - Var Portion Type would be based on Plan Act Qty instead of SKF
    5. Execute KSCB - Folllowed by KSPI.....
    You can also try the above using SKF on receiver cost centers - But Act Type Catg 2 on the Sender Indirect cost center.... I guess, this is what you have done... In my opinion, this should also work...
    I believe, to transfer the costs as variable - You need to plan them in KP06 as variable (i.e. Activity Dependant Planning)....
    So, Plan your expenses on the indirect cost center in KP06 with reference to the Act Type Category 2
    br, Ajay M

  • Activity allocation - error

    Hi ,
    I have booked and followed up 10 participants but when i  tried to do  carry out LSO_PV18 activity allocation 5 participatns are missing , pleae let me know the cause for this issue.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    Hi,
    Thanks for the response. We are not using Billing ,even it is not coming in lso_pv17.
    The issue seems to be very strange , can some one please let me know if we have any authorization object's used for activity allocation.
    Thanks
    Kumar

  • Target = Activity allocation(KNMA)

    Hello All,
    Can any one please help me on the following issue. (Indirect activity allocation)
    The system is considering both variable and fixed planning costs adjusting with operating rate while calculating the target cost and settling to receiving cost center. This is wrong, it should only consider variable cost with operating rate in deriving the target cost. can any please suggest me where should I focus to solve this issue. Early help in this regard is very much appreciated.
    Thank you
    Srinivas

    Hi Srinivas,
    I missed this post.
    The system behaviour of considering both variable and fixed price is correct.
    if you don't need the fixed cost, then don't update it. 
    Please let me know if you need futher assistence
    Best Regards
    Surya

  • Difference between Direct activity allocation and internal activity allocat

    Hello
    I am pursuing SAP Management Accounting certification
    Can somebody tell me what's the difference between direct activity allocation and internal activity allocation. Please give some example and also specifications as to cost element categorry, activity type, etc.
    Asif
    Moderator: Please, do not post certification queries. Regarding your issue, please, refer to help.sap.com

    Hi,
    Activity means e.g.. sales call, customer visit etc.
    But service process means after you sale your product if some service related issue arrives then that is taken care by this transaction.
    Inspire by rewarding.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • Iteraton in Indirect Activity Allocation

    Hi All,
    At the outset, I WISH YOU ALL A HAPPY N PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR 2009.
    Issue:
    There are around 15 Service and Utility Cost centers and about 50 Administrative Cost Centers.
    The cost to be planned for these cost centers includes Fixed Cost and Variable Cost. But in SAP, Cost Element Planning for these cost centers in KP06, will allow only planning of Fixed Cost because there is no activity planning for these cost centers.
    IS THERE ANY WAY TO PLAN VARIABLE COST IN ACTIVITY INDEPENDENT PLANNING?
    For Service and Utility Cost Centers above, I created activity types and could plan both Fixed and Variable costs.  But, Clientu2019s business process demands iteration to take place among Service and Utility Cost Centers. Once the system does the iteration, then what ever the cost Per Unit comes in each of the Cost Centers is considered to be their final Per Unit Cost of services.
    I created Plan Cycle for Indirect Activity Allocation. But there is no u201CIterationu201D possible in that. The Activity Type Category in Plan is 2/3 and in Actual u201CBlanku201D (As in Planning).
    Because there is no Iteration available in Plan Indirect Activity Allocation, I created cycle for only Service Cost Centers (to get the Service Cost Per Unit) and Assessment Cycle to allocate the cost from Service Cost Centers to Production Cost Centers. When I run the Indirect Activity Allocation cycle, the system is allocating the cost from sender Service Cost Center to all Receiver Cost Centers by taking the Ratio of SKF instead of considering the Actual SKF Value.
    Example:
    Sender Service Cost Center A has Planned Activity Quantity of 1000 hr and Planned Cost of USD 100000. So, Planned Cost per Hr is USD 100. The receiver Service Cost Centers B, C, D has consumed 10, 20 and 30 hours respectively and balance of 940 hours were consumed by Production Cost Centers.
    My Plan Indirect Activity Allocation Cycle is as followsu2026
    Sender Cost Center       Receiver Cost Center     RTF
    Service Cost Center A      Service Cost Center B     10     
                   Service Cost Center C     20
                   Service Cost Center D     30
    So, I expect the system to allocate cost of USD 1000, USD 2000, and USD 3000 from Cost Center A to B, C, and D respectively.
    But I found the system taking the ration of B: C: D i.e., 10:20:30. So, the allocated amount isu2026
    To Cost Center B = (10/60)* USD 100000
    To Cost Center B = (20/60)* USD 100000
    To Cost Center B = (30/60)* USD 100000
    Though in u201CTarget=Actualu201D (which is based on u201COperating Rateu201D) method iteration is possible, this method is not suitable for clientu2019s business process, as, the actual activity hrs will be calculated by the system automatically based on the changes in output of final receiver cost centers. (Ex. When I do Plan Reconciliation).
    I seek your suggestion regarding this.
    Srikanth Munnaluri
    Hewlett Packard
    +91 9002288376
    Edited by: Srikanth Munnaluri on Jan 5, 2009 7:15 AM

    Hi Srikanth,
    Did you get a way to plan varriable costs in activity independant planning? Even I am looking for a solution to the problem. Let me know if you found out a way to do it.
    Thanks
    Naveen

  • Internal Activity Allocation in Training And Event Management

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem while internal activity allocation of attendees in Training and Event Management. When i try to run "Internal Activity allocation for Attendees" i get an error message as " Reference document 1005 could not be found".
    I have done all the configuration but even then i am unable to understand the reason for this error.
    Plz help
    Regards
    TS

    Hi,
    I have resolved the above error. it was due to master data maintainence.
    But now while posting i am getting an error that " Activity type XYZ can not be allocated to 2008"
    Can someone help with this?
    Regards
    TS

  • Training and event management - Internal Activity Allocation for Attendees(PV18)

    Dear all,
    I run the PV18 transaction (Internal Activity Allocation for Attendees). Lets imagine that I successfully allocated 1000 EUR in the CO module. Then I realize that it was a mistake, and I want  to correct this by sending -1000 EUR to CO.
    My question is: how can I do that? Is PV18 capable of doing this? Or this has to be corrected manually in CO module?
    Thanks
    Nándor

    >>I tried to create it and the system generated a message about using the allowed name space.
    if it is a warning message, I think, you can go ahead & create the HRTEM entry in TTYP table.. you can check if this will let you get past the Activity Allocation.
    ~Suresh

  • Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''

    hi ,
    During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e  "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
    Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
    pls help me to solve this problem.
    AMOL WAGH
    Edited by: amol  wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
    Edited by: amol  wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM

    Dear,
    For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
    After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
    Please give the feed back.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Purchased refurbished and unable to update

    I purchased a refurbished Mac Book Pro last summer. I tried updating iMovie but it says I must log in with the ID used to purchase it. I have no other ID. How do I correct this?

  • Adding a folder to get more organized

    I have the brand new Mac Book Pro and am using Mail BUT I need to make more folders to organize the mail that i need to keep. I can't seem to find how to do that. Thank you very much! Jonathan

  • INTEGER DATA TYPE+PAL

    Query 1)I am creating table in oracle 8.1.7 as Create table tablea (fielda INTEGER NULL Can anybody tell me what is max number of digits that can be stored in fielda.? I mean INTEGER stands for what in terms of NUMBER datatype. Query 2)I would be pla

  • Cloud services with hosting guaranteed to be Canada?

    Microsoft announced recently that it will allow clients to choose to store their data in data centres in their home country to help shield it from US government. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e14ddf70-8390-11e3-aa65-00144feab7de.html Having consulted a C

  • Why doesn't iTunes always give the option to search the iTunes store?

    When a library search produces no results, why isn't there a button to search the iTMS with the search box contents?