Activity confirmation issue

Dear Gurus,
We are facing issue in confirmation of Activity such as power , steam. As in process industry output is variable.
accordingly at the time of confirmation activity viz power , steam should varies is it possible?
In transaction cor6 we can enter manually units actually consumed.
My second query is
In T-code CORK and COID How to / where to enter actually consumed unit of Power and steam in screen? As users are using all the 3 T-code for confirmation.
Please guide me as we are facing cost variance in Process order confirmation due to activity.
Regards,
J.H.Pert

COID is just reporting transaction.
COR6N is single screen entry transaction
CORK is header confirmation
When you do confirmation using CORK, all the confirmable phases in the order gets confirmed to the yield qty mentioned in the screen, this also take care of activity confirmation.No option to post activity seperately.
cor6 you can post actual activities seperately

Similar Messages

Automatic Material Issue on Activity Confirmation

Dear All,
I am trying to setup the system so that on internal activity confirmation material assigned to the activity is automatically Issued to the WBS.
Issue:
BS, but when i confirm the activity system does not issue the material automatically when stock is available as unrestricted stock in the correspondign WBS.
When there is stock available in the Storage location mentioned in CJ20N for the material automatic GI happens on activity confirmation.
Can you please let me know why is system not issuing the material available as unrestricted stock on the corresponding WBS??
Warm Regards,
Jatinder

Dear Gokul, Srikant,
Fine i can use CN25 for confirmation.
Requirement is that i want to track stock on WBS level, and then issue it to Network/Activity from WBS stock? is this not possible via activity confirmation??
Is it that if i want to automatically post GI on activity confirmation, it is not possible from Project/WBS stock?
Warm Regards,
Jatinder

Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                          13.00                    AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                          2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
    Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                Electricity Cost                                                1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                          16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
      Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
      Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per        100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                      2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                          2.67-      542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar Chinchkar

Dear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
       QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
       (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
    3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
      Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total -                    965.57
     4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
     LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
     DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                              PL     Act     Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar

Network activity confirmations

1) Hi guys please advise is it possible to avoid (by means of error ) the second confirmation of an activity whihc was already fully confirmed and completed.
2) The milestone once it has received an actual date should not be possible to change the first actual date. So may be is it possible to get the field greyed out after doing the actual postings to milestone.I am not using the confirmation by means of a percentage completion of milestone and activity, instead my scenario requires the confirmation manually.
3) How can we control that the milestone actual date should not be less than 3 days of the system date.
The issue is important and urgent .Kindly advise
Thanks
RKS

Hi,
Thanks once again.
I have been trying the SPRO and Enhancements listed under Confirmations node, but have a feeling that they may work for controlling network activity confirmation and not for milestones.
Can you please confirm if these can work to control the milestone actual dates as per my requirement i.e. the actual dates once posted manually to milestone should not be possible to be changed.
Kindly let me know of any other enhancement or exits if you are aware.
Thanks and Regards
Rajeev

Cancellation of network activity confirmation

Hi,
Can any one please tell me how do i undo a network activity confirmation.
somesh.n

Saving not necessary - no confirmations were created
this is the error i get when i enter and save. I have confirmed an activity three times. Each time i have confrimed 1 hour of the total planned hours.
when i select the item and exectute it i dont get any pop up for reasons.
Also another issue regarding the same is i have confirmed an activity with the cost as 'x' and then i have changed the cost in kp26 to 'y'. kinldy let me know if the cost which has been changed shall be updated to the confirmed activity or the actual cost should remain the same as per the old cost.

Progress Analysis, Plan/actual % comparision based on activity confirmation

hello guyz,
I have to monitor the project progress based on activtiy confirmation, can anyone guide how can i see progress of project based on percentage with plan/actual dates comparison.
The business scenario is:
One top level WBS under which 2 WBS assign, each 2nd level WBS have one network assigned. The second level WBSE represent individual site where i have to perform various internal activities without cost involvements, only dates and number of durations to be maintained in each internal activity with finish start relationship.
The structure is:
Root WBS (level 1)--SITE 1 WBS (level 2)--
SITE 2 WBS (level 2)
> (Network 001) -
> (Network 002)----
> 001 0010 (1st Internal activity 2 days) -
> 002 0010 (1st Internal activity 2 days)-
> 001 0010 (2nd Internal activity 4 days) -
> 002 0010 (2nd Internal activity 4 days)-
> 001 0010 (3rd Internal activity 1 days) -
> 002 0010 (3rd Internal activity 1 days)-
> 001 0010 (4th Internal activity 3 days) -
> 002 0010 (4th Internal activity 3 days)-
In the above project structure i have entered the start planed dates for each network / site. The system automatically calculate the planned end dates after scheduling.
In execution phase, i have also maintained actual dates on activity confirmation only.
Now i need assistance to see the project progress for each network site.
Regards
Saqib Usman

the problum is still there kindly provide assistance...
I have to monitor the project progress based on activtiy confirmation, can anyone guide how can i see progress of project based on percentage with plan/actual dates comparison.
The business scenario is:
One top level WBS under which 2 WBS assign, each 2nd level WBS have one network assigned. The second level WBSE represent individual site where i have to perform various internal activities without cost involvements, only dates and number of durations to be maintained in each internal activity with finish start relationship.
The structure is:
Root WBS (level 1)--SITE 1 WBS (level 2)--
SITE 2 WBS (level 2)
> (Network 001) -
> (Network 002)----
> 001 0010 (1st Internal activity 2 days) -
> 002 0010 (1st Internal activity 2 days)-
> 001 0010 (2nd Internal activity 4 days) -
> 002 0010 (2nd Internal activity 4 days)-
> 001 0010 (3rd Internal activity 1 days) -
> 002 0010 (3rd Internal activity 1 days)-
> 001 0010 (4th Internal activity 3 days) -
> 002 0010 (4th Internal activity 3 days)-
In the above project structure i have entered the start planed dates for each network / site. The system automatically calculate the planned end dates after scheduling.
In execution phase, i have also maintained actual dates on activity confirmation only.
Now i need assistance to see the project progress for each network site.
Regards
Saqib Usman

Apple iPad 6.1.2 10B147 - Active Sync Issues Remain

Hi,
Please correct me ASAP if I am posting this in the wrong area of the discussion forum.
I have a batch of Apple iPad devices that are now connecting to our Exchange 2003 system using Apple iPad iOS 6.1.2 10B147 devices. It would seem that these devices may have the 6.1 Active Sync issue again even though this version was meant to fix the issue.
A couple of users have reported this morning reoccuring calender cancellations, we have also had excessive log growth on Exchange 2007 platform.
Here is the reported "Device Agent" from Active Sync logs:
Apple-iPad3C6/1002.147
Apple-iPad2C7/1002.147
Apple-iPad2C7/1002.147
Apple-iPad3C6/1002.147
Apple-iPad2C7/1002.147
Apple-iPad3C6/1002.147
Here is the reported Device iOS
DeviceOS
iOS 6.1.2 10B147
Does anyone know if Apple has this as a reported bug yet on their fixed version? If not is there an official Apple bug submission process that should be followed?
Regards
Ben Paddick

Hi waddock,
I think that for the most part, iOS 6.1.2 resolved the recurring calendar bug and the significant battery drain issues. With that said, I have had a couple cases of devices still experiencing the battery drain but not the calendar bug. Quick fix is to remove the Exchange mailbox(es) from the device and re-add it. If there are any existing accounts that use Exchange ActiveSync (I think Hotmail and legacy GoogleSync), I just remove and add them back to just in case.
I suggest checking here for periodic updates on what's going on with EAS (Exchange ActiveSync) and 3rd party devices like Apple:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2563324
I assume you're an on-premise environment, so to mitigate short-term, you may want to think about blocking certain devices on certain operating systems using your Device Access Settings in Exchange for mobile devices.
For feedback for Apple, you can do it a couple ways. This is the internet facing site:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/
Or you can create an Apple Developer account (or Apple IT program if you have an enterprise agreement with them) and start submitting feedback during your testing (i.e. beta versions of iOS):
https://developer.apple.com/
Hopefully this helps!

Activity confirmation concept

Dears
Can you any body explain me the concept behind the activity confirmation in QM
My understanding i am sharing here i request some expert review on this
1. The purpose of activity confirmation is for record quality cost
2. If we have two different task to do a inspection for a material (1-Inspection by machine, 2-labor for cleaning after inspections) so we need to define two activity by the T code:KL01
3. After defining activity price planing by t Code: KP26 (For the above created activity for one hour how amount is required)
4.Now when RR is happening we have to do the activity confirmation(for example 1-Inspection by machine how may hour we utilize to make inspection,2-labor for cleaning how many hour we utilize this activity also to finish the inspection)
5.Now QM cost report will give you for activity one how many cost incurred so far ,and also for the second activity also
Pls correct me if my concept is wrong
Thanks in advance
Faisal

Hi expert
any advice on this will be highly greatfull
Faisal

SAP HR Active Sync Issue

Hi,
I encountered SAP HR Active Sync issue: The IDM seems can't receive the IDOC but SAP side says the data already passed to port OK.
I enabled the verbose mode of the Active Sync logs and it is repeating:
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: IDOCs of message type HRMD_A will be processed.
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: {jco.server.gwhost=10.153.3.20, jco.server.progid=IDMRFC, jco.server.gwserv=sapgw01, jco.server.trace=1, jco.server.unicode=1}
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: Started IDocServer (IDMRFC)
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: Done initializing SAPHRActiveSync resource adapter.
2009-06-04T17:07:08.750+0800: SARunner: loop 0
2009-06-04T17:07:08.812+0800: Started, paused until Thu Jun 04 17:07:08 GMT+08:00 2009
2009-06-04T17:07:13.812+0800: Pause completed
2009-06-04T17:07:13.843+0800: Polling
2009-06-04T17:07:13.843+0800: Poll complete.
2009-06-04T17:07:13.843+0800: SARunner: loop 1
SAP side transaction WE02 shows the IDOC:
IDoc sent to SAP system or external program: Data passed to port OK
SAP HR Active Sync resource reference says:
1. Enter transaction code PFAL.
2. Insert the Object Type P for person objects.
3. Enter an Employee's ID for the Object ID or select a range of employees.
4. Click Execute.
5. Ensure that the status is set to passed to port okay.
6. The IDoc has been created. Check the Active Sync adapter log file to verify that
an update was received.
Now why I can't see the IDOC logs in the active sync adaptor log file?
Thanks!

Hi Wushilin,
Did you ever find a solution to this?
Thanks

Table for Activity confirmation

Hi PP exper
Kindly suggest me from which table I will get activity confirmation detail when I do the production order confirmation example my activity 9000( labor) 30 hr , 9001( m/c) 15 kw etc
kindly suggest me
Regards
Akil

Hi,
In AFRU.. we can get activity confirmation....suppose if we have many activity which unit are HR.. then we can not differentiate which activity have confirmed .
i want activity type and its confirmed
example Activity type 9000( m/c power) 30kw 1000( labor) 6 HR, etc
9000----
30 KW
1000----
6 HR
Regards
Aqueel

Error in activity confirmation using CATS

Dea all,
While doing activity confirmation using cats in the transaction CATA following error is occuring:
CATS: Transfer to Project System
No records for transfer to PS
kindly help.
regards,
sudhir

Hi
First record the time in CAT2 t.code
Then transfer the time to project system using CAT5 t.code.
Do you followed the above t.codes?
In selection screen what are the selection parameters have you maintained?
Thanks
S.Murali

Quantity not posted to object error in while activity confirmation

Hello All,
i am getting below error while activity confirmation , please help me on this below.
Note : Activity and cost center and KP26 no changes are made compare to preview year and current year , for the fiscal year 2014 i didn't get any error , only for the fiscal year 2015 i getting below error.

Dear Hari,
If the activity type of the confirmation has set the flags as
mentioned (indicator MANIST in table COKL is set) the system will simply
NOT post any quantity on the sender cost center/activity type during
the confirmation.
So all quantities which are currently missing (as these were not
updated by the confirmation) must be posted with transaction KB51N.
If you implement the coding corrections of #760437 you have the
possibility to change the message BK263 from "I" to "A" in transaction -
which is however not recommended.
So the advised procedure is:
-post all mising quantities with transaction KB51N first
-then run the report ZRKMANIST_RESET to remove the flag MANIST (which is
the reason why the confirmations did not post quantities on the
sender cost centers)
After this procedure, the quantities will again be updated when you
post confirmations.
Best regards,
Jason

Activity Confirmation - Gantt Chart - Planning board

Hi
suppose i have a activity duration from 1st february 2009 to 28th february 2009
on 15th february i confirm 0nly 10% of the work as completed in the activity confirmation screen in the degree of processing field and also enter the start date as 1st february 2009 and the finish date as 15th february 2009.
when we look at the planning board in CJ20n transaction subsequently (gantt chart) the activity bar shows a colouring from 1st february to 15th february instead of showing only 10% of the activity bar coloured for completion of the work
where is it possible to see the percentage completion of an activity graphically as 10% this data is available in table format in CN48N transactio

Hi,
we can view in table format by selecting the fileds related to percentage of completion in the project planning board (gantt chart).
The requirement you had explore is possible in MS projects, but in standard SAP we can't view in the graphically mode.
Regards,

Activity Confirmation

Hello all,
Scenario is- A FERT material assigned in the project which creates WBS reservation. FG is produced by production order and then delivered from Project stock.
Before delivery of the FERT, I want to check the activity confirmation to which FERT is assigned.
I have a WBS number as an input to call the BAPI, in the user exit for deivery @ save.
Which BAPI shall I call in to check the activity and reservation stauts for perticular WBS? and which FM will be useful to perform the confirmation of perticular activity?
Please reply..
Thanks and Regards

Hi,
Make use of the folowing BAPIs
1) BAPI_PROJECT_GETINFO - get all the activities for the mentioned WBS.
2) BAPI_BUS2002_GET_STATUS - get the status of required activity. Not sure how to derive the activity to which the component is assigned out of the all activities for WBS.
3) BAPI_NETWORK_CONF_ADD - to confirm the activity.
Regards
Sejo

Activity Confirmation workflow

Dear Experts,
I am using BO AFVC_NETW for network activity confirmation workflow. The start events of workflow are confirmed, partially confirmed, manually confirmed. I made a zcopy of the BO AFVC_NETW and added these 3 events and delegated the Zbusiness object. Once the wf triggers i have user decision step assigned to first level approver. If he approves it then i have one more user decision step. if second level approver also approves it i complete the workflow.
When I confirm the activity using tcode CJ20N two events of my wf are getting triggered which i saw in SWEL.
I expect to get only one workitem for first level approver. But i am getting 2 workitems instead of one. Can you please tell me why i am getting more than work item. Am i getting 2 workitems due to the reason that two events of my wf are triggered or am i missing something. I have no loop step in my wf.
KR,
S Bharath

Hello,
Two events are being created. If they both act as triggers for the workflow, then you will get two workitems.
If you really need both events as starting events then perhaps you should create a start condition that checks if there's already a workflow instance running with the same object key.
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

Activity confirmation issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for