Activity of settlement rule after closing of IO

Hello,
i have that case: I closed one IO, after that i run the transaction KOSRLIST_OR and the status of the settlement is ACT. Please advise hot to deactivate that IO.Is it normal after closing of IO to have that kind of status?
Thank you in advance!

Hi Sri Ram,
I had done same thing as you mentioned, I had assigned settlement rule in project definition. I had selected copy from superior WBS element system is showing same error " Superior WBS element not found and nor automatic settlement rule is created after saving project.
Regards,
Varun Maheshwari

Similar Messages

Settlement Rule in Networks

Hi Friends,
I'm trying to create settlement rules for networks in CJ20N and facing issues. I have projects with WBS elements, networks, and activitieis (standard projects). System is allowing to maintain dettlement rules for WBS elements, but not for networks, i.e., when I go to Edit - Cost - Settlement rules, after selecting networks, the settlement rule page is coming up only in display mode. Any suggestions on what could be the root cause? FYI... I have all necessary authorizations roles in Project Systems.
Regards,
Aman

Also check if your network is header assigned or activity assigned. if the same is header assigned in that case only you can assign settlement rule at network header if the same is activity assigned in that case you need to assign settlement rule at activity level.
With Regards
Nitin P.

Delet the settlement rule

hi
How to delet the settlement rule , after realease project.
if i check in settlement rule for Activity it will show all option in disply mode .
thanks
sunil

Has settlement from the Network Activity already ran?
On the settlement rule line ....check the values in the First Used & Last Used fields
If both of these are not blank, then settlement has already ran.
To delete you would need to undo each run of settlement to remove the date.
If in Production this is probably not an option. Therefore you will need to end the existing settlement rule with an end date in end period & year.
Then create new settlement rule.
If both First Used and Last used are blank then I would try entering /SU53 into the command field to check for missing authorisations.
I am automatically generating settlement rules from Activity to parent WBS and have no problem changing or deleting the settlement rule prior to settlement running.
Steve

Premiere Pro CS 6.exe stays active after closing the program

I am experiencing a problem with Premiere Pro CS 6.03. When I close the program, the second monitor would not return to desktop (it stays a black screen). The premiere pro cs.exe is active in taskmanager. Only after I end the exe process would the second monitor return to desktop. I am not using any third party hardware, only Adobe player for second monitor out. This problem occurs often, but not every time I use Premiere. I have never experienced this problem in Premiere Pro CS 5.03, which is still installed on the same PC. The technical Spec is: Intel 3930K, 32 GB RAM, GTX 560, Windows 7 Professional 64 bit. I have tried to toggle between different NVidia drivers, but with no effect.
Any help would be appreciated!

I've had the process stay open after closing the program as well, but only on one of my two machines. For me, the 6.0.3 update seemed to correct the issue. Not sure why it's still happening in your case.

Settlement rule for Network activity

hi,
in my project, settlement rule of network activity is automatic to the superior WBS.. however i noticed that the default settlement rule is FUL.. is it possible to make setting such that the default settlement rule would still be to the superior WBS but it is PER (periodic settlement insted of full)
how to do this?
thanks in advance.

see OSS note 317871
Summary
Symptom
When you create a network or a new network activity, the respective settlement rules can be generated automatically by default. In the standard system, default rule PS1 is currently supported for this. This default rule creates a settlement rule for the full settlement.
A default rule for the generation of a settlement rule for periodic settlement does currently not exist.
Additional key words
CN21, settlement rule
Cause and prerequisites
At present, the function is not supported in the standard system.
Solution
The attached program creates a corresponding new default rule PS2 which generates a periodic rule. In Customizing, you can assign this default rule to the affected network types afterwards.
It is planned to include this default rule in a future release in the standard system.
Source code corrections
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 18.06.2007 07:57:36
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Advance development
Primary Component: PS-COS-PER Automatic and Periodic Allocations
Secondary Components: PS-COS-PER-SE Settlement
Affected Releases
Software
Component Release From
Release To
Release And
subsequent
SAP_APPL 40 40B 40B
SAP_APPL 45 45B 45B
SAP_APPL 46 46B 46B
SAP_APPL 46C 46C 46C
SAP_APPL 470 470 470 X
SAP_APPL 500 500 500
SAP_APPL 600 600 600

Firefox stays active in memory after closing program

After closing Firefox and restarting the progam after a while, a popup message appears saying Firefox is allready active (message in dutch) and Firefox does not (re)start. It is not an active window however, since I closed it down...
When I press alt-ctr-del, Firefox can be found as "active"in the processes-tab.
To re-start Firefox I now manually must click on "end process" and now Firefox starts without problem.
This happens on each occasion after closing the program.
Anyone know how to solve it? Help appreciated!

Please read this article:
http://support.mozilla.com/pt-BR/kb/Firefox+hangs#Hang_at_exit

Cannot Maintain settlement rule for the activity

Dear All,
I tried to maintain settlement rule in activity under WBS. But it shows message :
You cannot maintain the settlement rule for the activity
Message no. CN006
Diagnosis
The network has header account assignment. You can only maintain settlement rules for the network header.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Maintain the settlement rule for the network header.
Please help.
Cheers,
Nies

Hi,
I already tried the config OPUV (network type Parameters) but it shows the activity account assignment already ticket.
If i go to network header and go to settlement rule the warning message shows :
Network has activity account assignment
Message no. CN057
Diagnosis
Costs can only be written to activities for the network whose key you have entered.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
1. Check whether you have entered the correct key for the network. Change it if necessary.
2. Maintain the key for the network to which you want the costs to be written.
In addition, if i tick the activity under the network header : it shows
You cannot maintain the settlement rule for the activity
Message no. CN006
Diagnosis
The network has header account assignment. You can only maintain settlement rules for the network header.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Maintain the settlement rule for the network header.
Cheers,
Nies
Edited by: Nies on Nov 6, 2009 3:26 AM

Network activity - settlement rule change FM or BAPI

I wonder if there is any FM or BAPI to change settlement rule for network activity?

Hi everybody,
I found in a Rusian foruma way to create a settlement rule using the functions of the FM KOBS. I changed a bit the code because my requirement was just to update the field URZUO of the settlement rule. The original post (in Russian) can be found here.
My implementation is more simple because the requirement was different:
types: begin of ty_objnr,
objnr like prps-objnr,
end of ty_objnr.
*.COBRA-Buffer (see FM KOBS)
types: begin of ty_cobra_buf.
 include structure cobra.
types: uflag like dkobr-upd_flag,
 end of ty_cobra_buf.
types: ty_t_cobra_buf type ty_cobra_buf occurs 10.
*.COBRB-Puffer mit Änderungsflag (see FM KOBS)
types: begin of ty_cobrb_buf.
 include structure cobrb.
types: uflag like dkobr-upd_flag,
 end of ty_cobrb_buf.
types: ty_t_cobrb_buf type ty_cobrb_buf occurs 10.
* Internal tables *
data: it_abrechnug type standard table of ty_abrechnung,
 it_objnr type standard table of ty_objnr,
 it_cobra like table of cobra with header line,
 it_cobrb like table of cobrb with header line.
* Data *
data: wa_cobra_buf type ty_t_cobra_buf,
 wa_cobrb_buf type ty_t_cobrb_buf,
 wa_objnr like line of it_objnr,
 wa_urzuo like cobrb-urzuo,
 l_mem_cobrb like wa_cobrb_buf[],
 l_mem_cobra like wa_cobra_buf[],
 l_mem_cobrb_zeile like line of l_mem_cobrb,
 l_mem_cobra_zeile like line of l_mem_cobra.
form urzuo_aendern using p_objnr p_pspnr p_urzuo.
data: c_objnr like prps-objnr,
 c_pspnr like prps-pspnr,
 c_urzuo like cobrb-urzuo.
c_objnr = p_objnr.
c_pspnr = p_pspnr.
c_urzuo = p_urzuo.
refresh: it_objnr,
 it_cobra,
 it_cobrb,
 l_mem_cobra,
 l_mem_cobrb.
wa_objnr = c_objnr.
append wa_objnr to it_objnr.
* Reas settlement rule from the DM
call function 'K_SRULE_PRE_READ'
exporting
 i_pflege = ' '
tables
 t_sender_objnr = it_objnr
* T_COBRA =
exceptions
 wrong_parameters = 1
 others = 2.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
 perform error using c_pspnr sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
 exit.
endif.
* Fill internal buffer with settlement rules
call function 'K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_GET'
 exporting
 objnr = c_objnr
 x_all = ' '
 tables
 e_cobra = it_cobra
 e_cobrb = it_cobrb
 exceptions
 not_found = 1
 others = 2.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
 perform error using c_pspnr sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
 exit.
endif.
* Save settlement rule in ABAP-Memory
call function 'K_SRULE_EXPORT_IMPORT'
 exporting
 i_mode = 'EX'
 exceptions
 wrong_mode = 1
 others = 2.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
 perform error using c_pspnr sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
 exit.
endif.
* Read ABAP-Memory
import l_mem_cobra l_mem_cobrb from memory id 'K_SRULE'.
* Change field URZUO and set Update-Flag
loop at l_mem_cobrb into l_mem_cobrb_zeile where urzuo is initial.
 l_mem_cobrb_zeile-urzuo = p_urzuo.
 l_mem_cobrb_zeile-uflag = 'U'. "Update Kennzeichen
 modify l_mem_cobrb from l_mem_cobrb_zeile transporting urzuo uflag.
endloop.
* Clear internal buffer
call function 'K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_REFRESH'
 exporting
 objnr = c_objnr.
* Fill ABAP-Memory with new rules
export l_mem_cobra l_mem_cobrb to memory id 'K_SRULE'.
* Fill internal buffer with new rules
call function 'K_SRULE_EXPORT_IMPORT'
 exporting
 i_mode = 'IM'
 exceptions
 wrong_mode = 1
 others = 2.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
 perform error using c_pspnr sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
 exit.
endif.
* SAve new rules
call function 'K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_SAVE'
 exporting
 dialog = 'X'
 objnr = c_objnr
 i_status_update = ' '
 exceptions
 no_rule_for_objnr = 1
 others = 2.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
 perform error using c_pspnr sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
 exit.
endif.
commit work.
perform erfolg using c_pspnr.
endform. " URZUO_AENDERN
Hope it helps,
Jaime

SD settlement rules to regenerate after strategy changed in the req.classes

Hi Experts
I need to complete thousands of settlement rules on SD sales orders. Sometimes just one item does not have a settlement rule. When I create the settlement rule for that line, it doesn't take the characteristics of the segment as shown on the Accounting tab. I have changed the strategy for the requirement classes 011,031 and 039. This doesn't update retrospectively.
Is there any way to regenerate the now automated rule please?
Kind regards
Dawn

Hi,
Existing sales orders with manual settlement rule will not be considered when you use the automatic generation of
settlement rules. This is to avoid wrong or contradictory settlement rules being created automatically.
When you use manual settlement rules into COPA, it is the normal system behaviour not to pull the information from the sales order into the settlement rule. This is to allow a maximum of freedom in creating settlement rules. There is a note no. 1093777. This is for customers who want to transfer at least the sales order number and item into the manual settlement rule. Then you can click on "derivation" to populate at least a few characteristics for settlement. It works with sales orders. If you have a lot of sales orders to work on, you could also check if certain additional derivation rules would help you populate more fields
automatically.
It is also important to know that manual settlement rules are not updated when the sales order is changed. This is probably the reason why you implemented automatic generation of settlement rules. The automatically generated settlement rules are updated when the sales order is changed.
regards
Waman

GR/IR expenses not affected with the settlement rule run process in the GL

Please neglect by previous post with the same title
There is a problem I face while running the settlement rule process related to internal orders on the GR/IR expenses.
According to the internal order settlement rule every expense associated to an Internal order no. whether its an account payable or manual journal accounts it should be settled (distributed) on the cost centers specified in each internal order after the monthly settlement run process is done through T.Code "KO8G", and this actually happens on the entries that are booked manually through T.Code "FB50", but the GR/IR entries is the biggest problem, it didn't reflect the settlement rule distributions in the GL it just gives me the original transaction once its was automatically created through T.Code "MIGO" they are only allocated to a one profit center with no cost center and without being distributed to a multiple cost centers according to the distribution strategy.
After a long search I found that the cost center distribution occurred only on a secondary none GL account named A&P Settlement (720010), all GR/IR expenses was settled correctly only on this account not through the ordinary GL accounts (e.g. Gifts, printed materials) and of course the correct distribution didn't appear in the GL,
So is there a transaction or any way to allocate the GR/IR expenses to there correct cost centers with the correct cost element in the GL?
Is there anything to do with the GR/IR calculation that depends on quantity base not value base?
The Process as follows:
(1) Creating Internal order with a settlement rule (E.g. Cost center 1 (50%) Cost center 2 (50%)
2) Creating a purchase order associated to an internal order
3) The Goods received and creating the GR transaction T.Code "MIGO"
Acc/DR Expenses accounts
Acc/CR GI/IR Account 400301
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)

4) Closing the GR/IR accounts when receiving the invoice T.Code "MIRO"
When we receive vendor invoice:
Acc/Dr GI/IR Account 400301
Acc/Cr Vendor Account
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)
5) Performing the Internal order settlement rule run process
(N.B. By entering the report of the cost center (Actual/Plan/ Variance) T.Code S_ALR_87013611
I found that GR/IR expenses was not charged on the concerned cost centers as shown in the GL )
Your Reply is highly appreciated

Thanks for your kind reply,
But is there a way solve this problem?
And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Error while creating settlement rule

We are trying to create a Settlement Rule for a Production Order for material 900010001 with following details:
Cat:MAT
Settlement Receiver:900010001
% :100
Settlement Type:FUL
System is giving an error msg. no.KD063 'Distribution rule for an Article can only be created automatically'.
Can anyone help us in analysing the same.
We want that while creating a Production Order Settlement Rule shall be created by default for Cat:MAT & Settlement Receiver:900010001 (Material of Production Order).Can anyone guide us how the same can be achieved.
With Rgds.,
Rakesh Kumar

Hi..
please try this....Goto KSR2_VBP.
THere are two strategies.. 01 and 02.
01 for manual creation of settlement rules
02 for auto creation..
first check whether 01 and 02 are in your plant.
Sales and distrib....basic functions......auto gen. of settlement rules.......
here you ll find two activities.
(1)maintaining the settlement strategies and
(2)activating one among them.
If you activate 02, your problem will be solved..
Also check this..
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/a9/ab777d414111d182b10000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
The settlement profile is to be defined for thee particular Order Type to generate automatically.
Define Production Order Type in OPJH
Under Cost controlling check the settlement profile .
If not create the same in OPJH.
Settlement Profile: Create settlement profile - SPRO > Controlling > Product Cost Controlling > Product cost by Order > Period End Closing > Settlement > Create Settlement Profile
Enter Settlement profile from OPJH or Choose one for production order
and configure Settlement profile. Indicators
with wishes
karthick.

Maintain settlement rule of the sender

Dear All,
Hi, I am Settling the all orders in co88 t.code, i run test run mode for all orders.At the time of running i am getting the below error:
Maintain the settlement rule of the sender
Message no. KD205
Diagnosis
Either the settlement rule for the sender does not exist, or it is incomplete.
The settlement rule must contain settlement parameters and at least one valid distribution rule. A distribution rule is valid for a settlement run if
The settlement period is in the validity interval for the rule, and - if a settlement type was specified during settlement -
The settlement type corresponds to the rule for the specified settlement type.
Settlement type FUL -> The system selects all rules with the FUL and PER settlement types.
Settlement type PER -> The system selects all rules with the PER settlement type.
The settlement share is set for the rule (percentage, equivalence number).
Procedure
The settlement rule belongs to the sender master data, where you can maintain it.
Internal order
Proceed
CO Production order
Proceed
Project
Proceed
Cost object
Proceed
Network
Proceed
QM Order
Proceed
PM Order
Proceed
Production order
Proceed
Process order
Proceed
Sales order
Any body please help, where i can check the settings, I checked my settlement profile and allocation structure also.it's working properly, but i am getting the error at the time of order settlement in co88.
Thanks & Regards
Reddy

Hi
Each Order Type is assigned to the Settlement profile and in settlement profile the Settlemet receiver is maintained.
Genereal Critaria
Sales Order Settled               to Production order.
Production Order Settled       to Material
Internal order settled              to Cost center or GL
Please refer following T code.
OKO7     Creat settlement profile
Check for Periof End Activity in Costing.
Product Cost by Sales Order
Product Cost by Order
Internal Orders
Period-End Closing > Settlement > Create Settlement Profile

Firefox apears in firewall even after closing all processes and continues to download file

firefox continues to download files even after closing all the processes, this behavior was noticed by looking at the my firewall activity log. I am using get them all download manger (firefox extension) to download files in firefox. When first time firefox is started after starting computer it doesnt have any problem, but once I open the download manager and start downloading files it never stops.
I am using : down them all version 2.05 beta on FF 3.6.12
1. start computer
2. open firefox
3. check firewall status (bitdefender firewall running at report level) - no activity noticed
3. add url to download file in download them all manager
4. start download - bitdefinder shows firefox accessing internet
5. pause download
6. check firewall status - bitdefinder doesn't show firefox accessing internet in process listing but it does show network activity is going on at its peak.
7. close all firefox windows and remove firefox.exe from task manager
8. check bit defiender firewall status it continues to run at peak eating up all the network bandwidth
9. remove rule of firefox from firewall so as it may prompt when firefox try to connect to internet (bit definder firewall is running in report mode for approval for each connection)
10. as soon as rule removed, bit definder pops up window sayaing firefox is trying to access remote server (same from where the download was earlier started)
11. Allow the firefox to access it and again it will start downloading in background and bitdefinder shows up internet activity at its peak.

naah, looks like its problem of firefox, i removed the plugin and tried downloading using the normal download winodw of firefox but same problem, this time it starts picking up item from the download window and continues to download

Process order - settlement rule

hi experts,
our client has a R&D trial batches scenario .
for that they will create a process order and the cost should go to cost center of r&d and not to matrial.
at present i get MAT in settlement rule , so the cost is settled against material.
i need CTR to come in default when i create the process order instaed of MAT .
please advice.
regards,
satish

If PS is implemented
for project related production for R & D
1) create a project profile with non valuated( for raw material procurement for project the price is taken from info record.
2) assign the production material in activity
3) maintain a settlement rule as cost center R &D
4) Run a MRP for a material
5) convert plan order into production order, system will set the WBS as settlement rule
6) Do the GI in MB1A or co11n ,confirmation in Co11n & GR in MB31 or MIGO or in CO11n
(If the material is valuated, system will take MAT as default ( as per the setting in OPL8 default settlement rule as PP1 or PP2)
the reason is if material is valuated, variance = (GI value + activity value) - GR value
only the variance in settled in settlement, so the variance value( (GI value + activity value) - GR value ) is going to MAT
if the material is non valuated then variance =(GI value + activity value) )
7) do the settlement for production order ( the variance (GI value + activity value) ) is settled to WBS element
8) after that confirm the project in CN27.
9) settled the project in CJ88, the cost will settled to relevant cost center
if PS in not implemented
or go head with
you can create a order in CORO itself by maintaining settlement rule as CTR with R& d cost center( manually)
we can't make particular cost center as default in settlement rule.

Activity of settlement rule after closing of IO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for