Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH

Dear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM

Dear,
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
Please give the feed back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Activity type E not allowed for equipment entered

Dear Sir , We are using ETM . Following error is coming while creating performace based document .
Activity type E not allowed for equipment entered
Regards
Anil

Give 1 for both type and give it a try.
for target=actual which is type 5 pls check the link below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/66/bc6faa43c211d182b30000e829fbfe/content.htm

"Prodcut allocation check not allowed for ATPcat.'BR' and application".

SAP Experts,
Whenever, I delete a delivery, I am seeing a pop-up message with the information message as "Prodcut allocation check not allowed for ATPcat.'BR' and application". Is this a standard functionality. We dont have ATP Check/Allocation check during delivery delete. How come we get this message ?
This is something curious. Can someone help me on this please ??
Thanks,
Babu Kilari

Delete the ATP category BR from check control for A (Sales document). It seems when you are deleting a delivery the transfer of requirements settings pop this
Let me know if you are successful
Regards,
Loknath

With out goods issue for order system should not allow for order confirmati

Dear all
with out goods issue system should not allow for order/operation confirmation.
how it is possible.
Regrads
Srinivas

Dear ,
In some cases we required to do confirmation or TECO without GI .
We can change it as per req using user exit
Regards,
Ishwar

Invoice is not allowed for order 00065

Hi experts,
This error is relating to the Accounts payables(SAP). The error occurred and the invoice has fallen out from ERP (SAP) while posting the invoice. The error is "no invoice is allowed for order 00065".
some Inputs: if you go to ME23N screen line item details invoice tab you can find the check boxes like Incoming Invoice, cost centre and Order. Usually for a particular PO incoming invoice and cost centre check boxes will be checked but in this case Order check box is checked and the invoice has fallen out from ERP.
Could any body please let me know how to resolve this issue in SAP. I'm not FI/CO consultant but SAP BW if I know i can guide team.
Thanks in advance,
amarnath

Dear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

KKAX - error 'Manual WIP/results analysis is not allowed for order

We are running KKAX on some process orders. A few of them get the error 'there are values for cost element 999999 that are not assigned to any line ID'; however, we do have a line id set up for the cost element, etc; when we drill down further on the message, what we end up with is 'manual wip/results analysis is not allowed'. The business transaction for this is KABM. I can see on the order that KABM is not a permitted business transaction.
We only have this problem on a few of the orders. How is the KABM being invoked? Is it caused by an order status? How can I fix this?
Thank you

Hi Christian
i have come up with the new business requirement
I want to change some of the material in one of the plant into discreete.For that, I tried to delete the production version and then tried to uncheck repetitive manufacturing indictor in MRP4 view.
But it is giving the following error
Either you are attempting to delete production version 1000 or
you haveattempted to deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the production version.
It is not possible to delete the production version or to
deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the following reasons:
o Cutoff period for WIP calculation has not yet been
established. For the period in which a goods receipt was last entered with reference to this production version.
o The cutoff period for variance calculation has not been
defined for the full life of the production version.
Can you please help me out how to resolve this issue

Actual activity price does not exist for cost center / activity type

Hi,
We are trying to upload the time sheet related data(number of hours an employee workred on a project) ect from Non SAP to SAP.
We have used a customized program and have loaded the data from se38.
All this HR data will be saved in CAT2
Later we transfer the time related data into SAP FI/CO using CAT7.
+When tested with a couple of employees time sheets, they got uploaded in SE38 proerly and when transfered it through CAT7 it was properly taking the hour*rate is cost and was reflecting in the respective cost element.
For a few time sheets in SE38 we were getting an error saying that the cost center(100501)/ activity type(EAT001) does not exist for 2010.
Hence we have taken, FY 2010, the cost centes and activity types in KP26 and have given the planned Activity as 1. No planned cost in KP06.
We have run the price calculation forr the FY 2010.
Then we were able to uplaod the time sheets, but when we tried to transfer the data through CAT7, it throws an error saying no activity price exist for cost center 100501/ activity type EAT001. If I ignore the warning an proceed, no amount is being calculated.
When uploaded employee time sheets before, all the cost were getting claculated and were entering into the respective cost elements, but now no amounts are being calculated and it is taking Zero.
When checked the previous years data i.e, 2009 all amounts are fine, in KSII I can see the activity quantity filled with some numbers in 2009, where from are they comming? I have checked KBk6 nothing was mentioned.
PLease assit
Regards,
shilpa

Hi
I never used CAT* though, but the error means that you need to maintain a activity price in KBK6 (Actual price)
Regards
Ajay M

Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                          13.00                    AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                          2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
    Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                Electricity Cost                                                1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                          16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
      Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
      Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per        100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                      2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                          2.67-      542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar Chinchkar

Dear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
       QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
       (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
    3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
      Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total -                    965.57
     4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
     LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
     DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                              PL     Act     Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar

Limit PO Err Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services

Hi,
I am having a problem while replicating free text Limit PO's to R/3 in SRM 4.0 SP 13. The issue is while creating Free Text Limit SC with the "Confirmation and Invoice" option checked in, the PO's get created in SRM but fails while replicating to R/3 and in RZ20 errors as "Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services" although in vendor master i don't have check for the field "GR-Based Invoice Verification".
On the contrary while creating SC with the "Invoice Only" the PO is successfully replicated to R/3 with item category as B for limit orders.
Now i have noticed if i make changes in the vendor master data i.e. check the flag "GR-Based Invoice Verification" then the PO in my first scenario gets replicated successfully and also with respect to the second scenario but it gets replicated in both the scenarios as item category "D".
As far as SRM standard it should have ideally behave like the below:
Limit SC with GR AND Invoice -> item category D
Limit SC with invoice only -> item category B.
Now my question is why do my PO's fail in R/3 in the first scenario and also if i check the flag in vendor master for GR-Based Invoice verification then in the second scenario the item category is "D" instead of "B".
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards
Anirban

Hi Georg,
We don't have any active implementation for the BADI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI.
Best Regards,
Anirban

Actual activity allocation

Hi SAP Gurus,
I am facing one problem in Actual activity allocation
In production cost center, cost centers are credited with plan price (Re.1) for every activity qty confirmation
the system posted from Jan to May plan price
in the month of June system posted price Rs.2.02 for five transaction for the rest of the transaction it is taking Re.1. I don't from where this has been picked/calculated by the system
Please help in finding this
regards
VSN
Edited by: priyas78 on Sep 5, 2011 2:23

HI,
- What is displayed in KSBT - plan must be the same of kp26; executing the report select only period 6, otherwise the system show average values.
- May be I did not understand correctly your question; for clarification, what do you mean with "Re" and "Rs"? are them two different activity type?
Paolo

FI posting not allowed for WBS Element

Hi All,
While doing down payment billing I'm getting error that FI posting is not allowed for WBS element. But FI periods are open for all months in 2008.
Please suggest how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Harish

Hello
Account assignment
If you want to post actual costs and commitments to a WBS element, you have to indicate that the WBS element is an account assignment element in the WBS. All objects that can be assigned costs and commitments within a project (for example, orders, networks, or purchase orders) can only be assigned to a WBS element if you have set the account assignment indicator for the element.
In Customizing for the Project System, you can set an indicator to specify that costs are planned for all WBS elements or only for specific WBS elements.
Billing
If you want to post revenues to a WBS element, you have to indicate that the WBS element is a billing element in the WBS.
Reg
assign points if useful

Posting in foreign currency not allowed for external tax system

Hello all,
I created a purchase order for inter-company stock transfer. Then created a corresponding outbound delivery and goods issue using VL10h and completed goods issue. Then I completed good receipt using MIGO. When I was trying to create a sales order I got this message "Posting in foreign currency not allowed for external tax system". What could be the reasons for this message. The message number said FS885.
One final note. I am able to create Billing document with manual batch number input in Delivery document item. But when I am using Batch split I am not able to generate invoice. Can anyone tell me what could be the problem here.

Hi Samir,
The Goods Received NI (Allocation Cost Account) need to be balaned in Local and System Currency as this is a Multi Currency account and these are the currencies that Business One will offer reports in.
The Foreign Currency for this account is irrelevant as you can never get a balance in FC for a multi currency account, neither will you find any reports for this.
If the client insists you can create a manual Journal entry in FC only to correct this. Business One does not offer any functionality to correct the Foreign Currency in this scenario. (like Exchange Rate difference for Local Currency and Conversion Differences for System Currency)
To do the manual JE open the form settings and the tab 'table', here untick the box 'From FC Field'. This will enable you to create a FC JE only.
Hope it clarifies the issue.
Jesper

LOCID is not defiend for Order data type ORDR

Dear All,
I am trying to load data in to Order forecast details in Dynamic
replenishment of SNC in the WEB UI, after entering the Product and
Customer location, when I clicked on GO system is giving the below
error.
Time series error in class /SCF/CL_ICHDM_DEMANDMN_DATAAXS
method /SCF/IF_ICHDMAXS_2_CNTL~SELECT
Access error for time series type DFC01, key figure CORDEROR, ODM
message: Parameter LOCID is not define for order data type ORDR
Could you please help me out what to do in this case.
I have re activated the following components mentioned, still system is
giving the above problem.
Activate Order Component
Activate Order Data Type
Activate Order Data Area
and
Activate Time Series Data Type
Activate Time Series Data Area
Thanks and Regards,
T.Muthyalappa

Hi,
Make sure you have proper authorization.(sometime system does not display the error but user don't have authorization to create/update/modify table entries to be on safer side assign SAP_ALL profile to your ID if it is allowed as per your company security process).
I think issue is with InfoObject 9ALOCID is not activated properly.
You need activate InfoObject 9ALOCID as mention i below step2 but it is better you follow below steps.
1) Then force generate ODM.
2)Go to transaction code:/N/SCA/TSDM09 enter time series DFC01 and select Radio button Activate Planning object Structure.
Regards,
Nikhil.

QM action not allowed for DTP requests in master data and Text tables

Hi,
I have a master data object load request which has failed, returned error in st22 and job finished.
BUT the request has not turned red in the monitor - it's still yellow. That means that I can not delete request nor start new load to infoprovider because it believes a request is still running. But it's not, I've checked both sm37, sm50 etc.
When trying to manually change QM status to 'red' it says 'QM action not allowed for DTP requests in master data and Text tables'
How can I force QM status to red so that I can move on?
Running NW2004s BI (7.0) Patch 15.
I searched for this question but there is no answer
Thank you

Folks
I know how frustrating this problem is even in netweaver 7.0 environment. I found a solution for this problem atlast and it works but a not direct way of resolving this issue.
When this request is in yellow status and not able to change / delete the request, its actually in a pseudo status and it is a bug in the program. This request sits in table RSBKREQUEST with processing type as 5 in data elements USTATE, TSTATE and this 5 is actually "Active" status which is obviously wrong.
All we need is, ask your basis person to change the status to 3 in both these data elements and then it allows to reload the delta. Once the delta is successfully loaded, you can delete the previous bad request even though it is still in yellow. Once the request is deleted, the request status gets updated as "4" in table RSBKREQUEST.
Hope this helps.
Thanks

Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for