ACTUAL ACTIVITY RATE CALCULATION
Hi Gurus,
Is it possible to calaculate actual activity rate based on plan hours......
I know that we can splitt the actual cost based on plan hours by selecting splitting rule 22...
Now im doing actul activity rate calculation through ksii...
Then system considering actul hours confirmed in production for actual activity calculation.....
Pls suggest me.
RAM
Thank you for prompt reply.
Suppose this month we have produced only . 10 finished products.... But actual capacity is 20..... What ever cost moniterd by the production cost centers will be loaded on total 10 products only at the time of revaluation of production orders if we calaculate actul activity rate based on actual hours....... so the cost of the product is getting increased... so that he want to calculate actual rate aslo with planned hours..... Is there any other solution for this..
Pls suggest me ...... its very urgent.
Ram
Similar Messages
-
Actual activity price calculation for production order
Hi
Can any one guide me in how many ways we can assign actual activity price calculation for production order?
I knew only one way by assigning PPP2 costing variant?
I have another doubt is: if we don't mention any material valuation indicator (moving average, standard) in valuation variant, how system will calculate material prices? is there any other way, to recognize the prices by system?
regards,
Ramesh BDear,
Costing variant PPP2 is linked to some valuation variant inn OPL1
System will check the valuation of material and activity according to this valuation variant
For material valuation there are many stg acceding to which system will take the price the raw material,
Valuation strategy for material component
Strategy sequence that determines the valuation of the materials used in the cost estimate.
Use
The materials are valuated using the price in the material master record or the values calculated in a material cost estimate.
Procedure
You can enter a single strategy, or you can enter multiple strategies in the form of a strategy sequence. If you enter multiple strategies, the priority of the strategy determines what price or what values are selected.
Examples
Assume that the following strategy sequence is entered for material valuation:
1. Planned price 1
2. Standard price
3. Moving average price
If the system finds a value in the Planned price 1 field (costing view), this value is taken as the value for valuating the material.
If the system does not find a value, the value in the Standard price field (accounting view) is used.
If the material does not have a standard price, the system uses the value from the Moving average price field.
if you have not mentioned, then system will give error that "valuation stg not found"
Valuation strategy for internal activities and processes-
Strategy sequence that determines how internal activities and processes are valuated in costing.
Use
The activities and business processes used are valuated with the prices from Cost Center Accounting or Activity-Based Costing to determine the production costs or process costs. The prices can either be calculated iteratively through price calculation, or entered manually by the user.
Procedure
You can enter either a single strategy or more than one strategy in the form of a strategy sequence. If you enter more than one strategy, the priority of the strategy determines which price is selected.
Examples
The following strategy sequence is entered:
1. Actual price of the previous period
2. Plan price of the previous period
3. The most current plan price
If the system finds a price for the activity type, this price is used for valuating the internal activities. If no price was calculated for the previous period, the plan price from the previous period is used to valuate the activity type.
If the system cannot find a plan price for the previous period, it looks for a future plan price, using the next price in the posting period to valuate the internal activities. For example, if plan prices have been entered for periods 2 and 3, and a plan price is calculated in period 1 for period 4, the system uses the price from period 3 in accordance with the valuation strategy Most up-to-date plan price.
Again if you have not mentioned, then system will give error that "valuation stg not found".
You can use any costing variant for actual (PPP2)and planned(PPP1) according to your requirement.. check in OPL1 -
Actual Activity Price Calculation
Dear Gurus,
1. I have defined activity type say "Power" through KL01
2. Maintained the planned price through KP26 for the cost center which is going to use this activity type. say
cost center is "CCTR1"
3. Now there is something as actual activity price calculation at period end
4. When i execute through KSII i get the actual price which is the debited cost elements of the "CCTR1"
divided by the Activity Type "Power"
5. The debit balance of cost elements in "CCTR1" is Rs 10000 and activity type consumed through process
order is 200 KWH, hence the Actual price comes to Rs 50 Rs/KWH. While the planned price in KP26 is
Rs 6/KWH
How logical is this....
With Regards,
AmitHi Amit,
Let me give some insight into the Activity price calculation and cost obsorption from Cost Center to Prodcution
1. Normally we incur the production cost through FI like Direct Labor, Power, Indirect Labour and other indirectct production overheads
2. This cost is posted to Production Cost Centers
3. Now this cost need to be obsorbed to product cost using either Activity costing through Routing or Overhead costing using costing sheet.
Since you question is for Activity costing, let us focus only on activity price and absorption to Product Cost
1. All the direct cost that can be tracked with certain reasonability with activity types can be absorbed through activity costing to product costing
2. Now in your case, take for example - the industry you are working is power intensive, then we can track the consumption of Power using activity costing
3. At the first instance, you need to forcast the activity quantities for the month (based on the production planning)
4. Based on this, you forecast the cost that would be incurred for the expected output
5. Calculate planned Acvitiy Unit price and update it in KP26. The updation can be manual or automatic (using Cost Splitting and Price Calculation in case of Activity independant cost planning)
6. For all the activity confirations to the production/process order, the cost obsorption will take place based on the planned price
Actual
7. The cost of the power will be booked in FI and posted to Production Cost Center for the month.
8. The actual Activity quantity will be booked from Production confirmation for the month
9. At the end of the month, you need to do the actual price calculation. This calculation will be based on the TOTAL COST BOOKED FOR THE MONTH TOWARDS POWER FOR THAT COST CENTER DEVIDED BY TOTAL QUANTITY CONSUMPTION RECORDED IN THE COST CENTER
10. Once this is done, You can revaluate the activity quanitities booked on each of the production order.
This is how the activity cost aborption will take place in product costing
Please let me know if you need further details in this regard
Surya -
Actual Activity Price calculation; KSII
Hello,
I am trying to calculate actual activity price but the system does not calculate the price though I have soecified the appropriate price indicator '5' in the Activity type master record.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!Something doesn't seem right here. You created an Activity Price and plugged in the Plan Fixed and Variable price for the Activity in KP26.
So why are you running KSII now? KSII is for Actual Activity Price Calculation, run at month-end after all your POs have been closed and activities booked.
Can you provide additional info.?
Cheers. -
KSS2 KSII Actual activity price calculation
Dear Grus !
I want to carry out actual activity price calculation. I assigned activity type act 100 to act500 to different cost element, and also assigned splitting rule 12.
also entered activity plan price in KP26. cost element planning in KP06.
When I carry out KSS2, system distribute cost of one cost element to activity types according to the target cost maintained in KP06. I want the result that cost distributed as maintained in the splitting rule.
is there any specific configuration that i missed?
Thank you all ~
LynnCheck whether you have maintained the Equivalence number for the activity type and cost center combination in KP26.
Also you have to run the KSPI before running KSII, because KSII result is the iterative one.
Hope this will help you.
Kamlesh -
Revaluation of actual activity rates
<MODERATOR: please post in the appropriate forum.>
Dear all,
My client is having make to order scenario in which at the time of production order confirmation (co14) actual activity is confirmned and loaded to production order as per planned acticity rates maintained in kp26
i.e actual activity * planned rate , but when actual costs of activities are debited to cost center for these activities there is under/over absorption in cost centers .So i want to know what is to be done for these absorptions .Through sap help i came to know about revaluation tool at actuals ,but how it is done kindly provide some suggestions or any other method of knocking off over /under absorption so that cost of product should be according to actual activity*actual rate.
Thanks and regards
vijayHi Vijay,
I do not have any documentation but I can you the splitting concept one more time. It is more important to understand the concept.
Suppose you have a cost center 1000 that produces 3 activities in a month. You incur lot of expenses in the cost center, say $10,000, out of which $4,000 are fixed costs, which means these costs can not be identified to one particular activity. There are 10 cost elements which contribute to these costs.
The other $6,000 are incurred due to activity 1, 2 and 3. There are 5 cost elements which cause these costs.
Using KP06, you need pair the activity dependent cost elements to the respective activity types and plan the costs.
This way you can separate variable costs from the fixed costs.
Splitting job splits the acitivity independent (fixed) costs to 3 activities in the ratio that you set in KP26. You need to assign equivalence numbers in KP26 for each activity type. Let us say you assigned 1, 3 and 5.
Once you make the above settings, the splitting job will split $4,000 into the 3 activity types into the ratio of 1, 3 and 5.
When you run KSII, activity price is calculated for each activity, which will be the total costs per activity divided by the actual activity output. So, the KP06 costs will be added to the split costs to determine the activity price.
Please try the above concept and the t-codes and settings I mentioned yourself and let me know if you face any problems.
Regards
Sharabh -
Difference between standard and actual activity rates
Dear All,
My client is having a process in which while downloading KOB1 the system is giving report of all the process orders wise activities confirmed in that month against some cost center.
Now when i am going into line item it takes me to process order confirmation display where activiies to be confirmed and activities yet to be confirmed are displayed.
After that cost center report S_alr_87013611 is displayed wherein actual rates(quantity ) is displayed for that activities.
Now the system shows difference between actual and standard activities.
The difference is the calculated in excel on the basis of KOB1 report and difference is loaded process order wise on calculation done in excel through LSMW (for transaction KB21n) wherein difference quantity is posted from cost center to process order.
Now client needs automation in the sense that no excel calculation should be done and difference should be posted for that month for each process order in the ratio calculated in excel.
Kindly provide any solutions if any, avaliable in standard or Z development has to be done.
Thanks and Regards,
VLMDear AP,
Have you any idea about how in above case Z development is to be done?
Regards,
VLM -
Hi Friends
For calculating the actual rate system take all the actual activity cost and divide it with actual quantity. I want to know how the system is calculating actual activity cost.
In KSII system will calculate the actual activity rate. What is the backgroung calculation. Or how to find out the actual activity cost per period is XXXX.
Regards
Jos
Edited by: Joji Jose V on Nov 15, 2010 3:58 PMHi Jose
1. Actual Activity cost means Actual cost posted with cost center and act type in FI postings / Depreciation postings
however, this is quite rare... To use this, Act Type must be switched in OKKP in Control Indicators
2. In absence of (1), Actual Actvity cost means Actual cost posted with cost center
3. If there are more than one act type in a cost center, then KSS2 would split the costs between the act types based on your Splitting rule in OKES... And then these costs would be divided by Actual Act Qty to calculate the Activity price
Regards
Ajay M -
Hi all
Can any body told me how to calculate the Actual activity price calculation.
Please let me know the details configuration as well as how its work
Regards
AnsumanHi
Firstly the cost centre is planned with activity price in KP26. There you can provide for the total activity value (say 600 hours) and then give the fixed and variable price.
You can set the actual activity price manually in KBK6. The actual activity entered would be multiplied by the fixed/variable rates and the actual rates would be calculated.
Hope this helps,
Regards -
CK11N :: Activity Price calculations
Hi Friends,
During the costing run in CK11N transaction, we are facing a little bit issue with activity value calculation. System is providing accurate times as per routings and also displaying correct rate as mentioned in activity, but during calculation, it is making something else value.
e.g. for an activity according to routing system is calculating 0.04 Mins, which is accurate, and displaying activity rates as 148.89 Inr/Hr. According to calculations, system should calculate as
148.89 / 60 * 0.04 = 0.10, whereas system is generating the value of 0.15.
Can you please suggest how system is calculating the values and are we doing some wrong calculation or we have to make some another way for calculating the activity values.
Your kind response is appreciable.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja.Activity Price is calculated on Interative basis. See whether you have run the Actual Activity price calculation through TC: KSII.
Regards
Kamlesh -
Hi
Somebody please explain how the actual activity quantity is confirmed on the production order ?Hi!
Different activity types like labor, Machine, Factory Overhead etc.. are defined in the system for different resources (Sterilising, Mixing, Grinding, Packing.....) in the production line.
Standard Activity rates are defined in KP26 with the combination of Activity type and Cost Center (generally different for each PP Resource - Work Center). Also the same are defined in Master Recipe with standard one.
When you create production order, system will catch standard rates for machine hour and labor hour which are charged at a predetermined standard rate to be derived. Now when you confirm the PP Order through COR6N, you will put all activity type in actual...say 40 labor hours and 50 machine hours..so based on standard rate defined in KP26 and master recipe, system will calculate actual activity rates.
Also for some of activity type like factiry overheads or others which are dependent on machine hours or labor hours, for that you have to define formula in your resource based on which system will calculate actual activity rates.
Hope it will clear to you. Pls get back for further query.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel -
At the time of actual activity price calculatoin with diffenrent currency
Dear Friends,
I am facing some problems. Followings are the information/Problems:
Controlling Area Currency - USD
Company Code currency - INR
Exchange rate - M type - 46.90
Exchange rate - P type 46.90
This problem is due to problem-1. At the time of actual activity price calculatoin, I am geeting huge price because system has multiplied (problem-1) and now system is taking posted amount in usd to calcualte actual activity price and according to my observation after calcualtion in usd system is converting price into INR
Questions - 1. What is the logic of calculation of actual activity price.
2. As I feel after analyses that sytems is taking posted cost in controlling area currecy and then calculating price and then converting into INR,
Is my theory correct in term of SAP standard functionality. is there any method by when system take only posted figure in inr for activity price calcualtion.
Please reply as soon as possible.
Thanks1. If you are using common controlling area with two different participating company code currency, then you have to use group controlling currency and integrate the other company code currency with parallel currency defined in the FI ledger. Hope this is design principle based on which you have selected group currency.
2. In case group currency controlling then non-participating currency should calculate the activity rates in group currency. Meaning you have define the activity rates at EUR currency and remember this has to accepted globally.
This is key drawback where you cannot define activity rates in INR, whereas there is no option activity type creation to give object currency as INR.
Hope this clarifies. -
Material ledger activity rate revaluation account determination modification
Scenario:
SAP ECC 617
Material ledger activated with activity rate revaluation (i.e. cost center over/under absorption posts to ML and not to production orders)
Standard SAP setup has PRV transaction key used to post both multi-level price differences to inventory and to capture the offset to the cost center clearing entries (GBB-AUI) causing the values to get comingled in the same account
Question:
For reporting purposes I would like to determine a unique account for the activity rate revaluation entries. There is no relevant general modifier available for transaction key PRV. Is it possible and practical to modify table T169A for a specific value string / field name combination that represents this material ledger transaction? If so, what is the combination? Or will this cause major issues with ML processing?
I'm trying to find a creative way to fill this gap without account substitution.Hi Eric,
This is an interesting one.
Modifying value string might be an option but in my opinion is quite a serious "brain surgery" on the system :-).
You may want to try another option.
In SPRO -> Controlling -> General Controlling -> Organization -> Maintain Versions
for version 0, Controlling Area Settings, Settings for Each Fiscal Year in tab Price Calculation there is field Revaluation.
One of the options there is 'Own business transaction'. With this option posting to sending Cost Centre resulting from actual activity price revaluation will be posted with different Business Transaction (although same secondary cost element as original activity allocation).
In reports you can separate postings based on Business transaction.
It definitely works for Activity Update 1 (revaluation of production orders).
I'm not sure if it works for Activity Udate 2 (no revaluation of production orders).
Please let us know the results of your investigation.
Regards,
Szymon -
Actual activity allocation / revaluation
Hi All,
My company is using SAP ISH (healthcare) in order to book Services to patient cases. We have linked the Services to some activity types which are generated by the Performing Unit in ISH. The Performing unit is linked to a cost centre in CO where the planned Activity rate has been set up (KP26). The patient case is linked 1:1 with an internal order in CO which receives the activity posting.
My company would like to ensure that all of the costs relevant to these activities are allocated out of the cost centre on to the receiving internal orders at month end. I have not worked in CO for a few years but I believe that this will involve a couple of steps in the month end process.
1 Re-calculate the actual activity prices
2 Revalue the actual postings
Each cost centre generates 2 or more activities which need to be valued. Example below
Performing unit THEATRE1 - Operating theatre, performs operations on 2 patient cases
CASE1 - Knee replacement
Activity type - Consumables = 100 units @ £2ea = £200
Drugs = 10 units @ £30ea = £300
CASE2 - Hip Replacement
Activity type - Consumables = 200 units @ £2ea = £400
Drugs = 50 units @ £30ea = £1500
Total credit to the THEATRE1 cost centre
Consumables - £600
Drugs - £1800
At month end the actual costs posted to the cost centre are as follows
Consumables - £800
Drugs - £2000
In order to credit the full amount to the Internal orders from the cost centre the prices must be recalculated and the activity allocation transactions need to be revalued.
Can you please confirm the steps to configure the month end price calculation (specifically around the splitting rule on the cost centre to determine which costs belong to which activity type), and steps to process the revaluation of the transactions?
Many thanks
PhilHi Philip,
When u work with cost center independent planning system can't underunderstand which GL account and cost center should plan with respective activity. For that reason we create splitting structures.
Cost center splitting is used in Cost Center Independent Planning where in KP06 you have cost center and cost element only. In this screen, you will not find Activity.
So, to give a relationship between Cost center, cost element, and activity, we will do splitting structure in OKES, and assign it to cost center in OKEW.
When you do KSS2, it will split the costs based on the splitting structure between activities and cost centers.
In this case, you have to maintain qty values in KP26 and later do KP06.
E.g.: we have 3 cost elements:
Salary - 100000
Depreciation - 200000
Electricity - 100000
Total = 400000
Activities:
Labour - 500 hrs
Machine - 1000 hrs
Total = 1500 hrs.
Here, when u calculate per hour rate system wi'll consider total amount / total activity hours.
= 400000/1500 = 226 INR/per hour
Here, if you want to consider salary amount only with Labour hours and deprecation and electricity for machine hours.
For this we will create splitting structure to provide link between cost elements and activity.
In the alove example salaries Wilkinson be linked to labour activity abduction dep and electricity will be linked to .machine hours.
When you run KSPI it will split the cost between respective cost elements and activities. Here, for salary per hour cost would be 100000/500 = 200 per hour.
Also machine per hour rate would be 300000/1000 hours = 300 per hour.
Same will happen in the case of KSII. I.e. actual cost/ activity hours Between respective cost elements and activity.
Hope you understand the basic concept of splitting structure.
BR, Srinivas Salpala -
Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing
Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1 E LAB10 994310 2.00 2.00 AED 1.0 HR Labour Cost New
2 E DIE20 994320 5.00 5.00 AED 1.0 HR Diesel Cost New
3 E ELE30 994330 1.00 1.00 AED 1.0 HR Electricity Cost
4 M 1100000042 5.00 0.00 AED 1 PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5 G 994201 0.00 0.00 AED Depriciation Cost
6 G 994202 0.00 0.00 AED Sales & Distribution Cost
13.00 AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67
2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
Labour Cost New 2.00
Diesel Cost New 5.00
Electricity Cost 1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 00.00
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 4.00
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 5.00
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 2.00
16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area 1000 Controlling Area
Cycle ZELE01 Status Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle 994215 Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per 100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB01 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE02 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE03 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE20 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE30 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB10 183.35
1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy Object Name AUn Act Qty Total price Price (Fixed) PUnit
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 Production Dxb HR 5.0 366.66 366.66 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.65 916.65 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.75 916.75 10
2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00- 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33 183.35
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33 183.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67 183.33
2.67- 542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar ChinchkarDear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
QTY 3.1 Tot Price 3,709.68 Planned(FIX) 3,709.68 Per Units 10
(System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 - 558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total - 965.57
4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
PL Act Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar
Maybe you are looking for
-
Sender Mail Adapter - CC list limitation
Hi All, Is there a way to receive the CC list in the MailPackage in stead of receiving it in the message Header? If the above is possible, please specify the sender mail channel configurations required and the changes required to the standard SAP Mai
-
I can't close the left hand tab except by exiting firefox. When i launch firefox the original tab stays open when I click on the red x, even if I have other tabs open. i can alter the website displayed on the left hand tab but it still won't close an
-
Reflecting the value of the logged in user in an af:inputText Column
Hi I have a Af:table with multiple Rows. In one of my Af:columns I want to reflect the logged in user and store this value when I commit the page. I am using JAZN security. Please Help.
-
Inbound Plug in standard SAP (create as an interface)
Hi All- I have a standard SAP component that I create an Inbound PLUG at the window level, I'm using that component (standard SAP) in another component (custom) but I don't have access to the inbound plug that I just create in the standard SAP becaus
-
[SOLVED] Netbeans won't start unless I am root
Hi problem as topic. I have this issue since I upgraded to 7.3 (I didn't do this earlier, for I have to reconfigure the android plugin each time a new version comes) The symptoms are exactly as discribed in this thread: https://bbs.archlinux.org/view