Actual cost getting Duplicated while Invoice Verification

Can any one help. Iam attaching the link below
Re: Actual cost postings duplicated
Thanks

Hi
Your Freight condition should be an expense condition and it should not charge upon the inventory
If it is defined as such, then create an OSS message and ask SAP to investigate. Chekc if any note already exists
br Ajay M

Similar Messages

  • While invoice verification system calculating tax on delivery costs also

    hi Guru's
       i am facing problem that , wile invoice verification system calculating tax on delivery costs also , and when i am removing tax code in front of dilivery costs , invoice is not posting , i can use zero tax code for delivery costs , but i dont want to use  any tax code for delivery cost , what should i do 
          please help

    HI,
    invoice is not posting , i can use zero tax code for delivery costs , but i don't want to use any tax code for delivery cost , what should i do
    You have to use tax code for that with ZERO tax code,its like import condition where we used zero tax code
    No other option!!!
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Excise duty not apearing while invoice verification in MIRO

    Hi,
    We have created PO with Back date entry eg. 28.04.2010 then received the material in migo on 26.04.2010 also the Excise captured and posted with back date as 26.04.2010.
    Now ewhen I am doing invoice verification in MIRO system doesn't propse Excise duty values.
    Please guide.
    Regards,
    Sananna

    hi
    >We have created PO with Back date entry eg. 28.04.2010 then received the material in migo on 26.04.2010 also the Excise captured and posted with back date as 26.04.2010.
    PO date is 28 and GR date is 26 is it so
    on which day ur doing MIRo try to do it on same day as Gr
    please check any error is giving while doing GR
    the error for PRD is may be due to difference in the Gr and miro amounts
    get with more clarification

  • Line item gets duplicated while creating billing document

    Hello,
    I have created an order with two billing plans (periodic & milestone) having single line item. When I create a billing document, line item gets duplicated.
    Can any one help me...
    Regards,
    Kishore

    Hello Balu,
    Kindly see the process below.
    Quotation -> Sales Oder -> Delivery -> Invoice (proforma) -> Excise invoice
    In the above mentioned process, I create quotation for 2 material for quantity 2 each say. I create SO with ref to quotation for only one material with quantity 2. Since I have to do proforma invoice & then the excise invoice, so I have created two billing plans. I have attached both the billing plans to SO. Now after completion of delivery, when I go for doing proforma invoice, I can see duplilcation of material (material in SO gets duplicated in Billing). When I go back to SO and remove one Billing Plan, then material is not duplicated in billing (proforma invoice). But as client said they want two billing plans to be attached to SO. So issue is with Billing Plan which creates duplication.
    I hope this clear's the issue to you...
    Can you suggest any way out....
    Regards,
    Kishore

  • How to avoid actual cost error log while confirm production order activity

    Hi
    I dont want to post actual activity cost via production order activity confirmation. But i want standard value keys for my production duration purpose. So,i defined activites(strd value key) in work center without assigning cost center to that work center. While i confirm in CO11N, system throws erro log as Actual cost calculation contain errors and allows me to confirm the activities. I am doing MB31 and all CO settlement activities also. But when i try to close the order it says error log exists,so closing of order is not possible. How to overcome this problem as i dont want to capture any cost of activites via production order,but i want confirmation only for production analysis.

    Hi
    Issue is resolved thru PP forum. Thanks for ur reply.
    Solution lies in Control key of routing and BOM costing relevancy.

  • PRD account getting hit during Invoice verification . OBYC

    Dear Experts ,
    When i am posting incoming invoice , the PRD account is getting hit by minor amounts . What is the relevance of PRD & whether it should hit or not .
    Regards
    Anis

    Hello Experts ,
    I am posting invoice for the materials with moving average price in backdate.
    eg
    mat A : 1000 kg , Rs 1000 /-
    mat B : 1000 kg , Rs 1000/-
    Now i have got an unpanned delivery cost of Rs 500. When I am posting this price i detailed tab following entries occur ( simulate)
    Vendor cr            2500-
    GR IR clrng         1000
    mat A Inv a/c       250
    GR IR clrng         1000
    Pr diff a/c             250
    Here at the time of booking the invoice the stock of mat B is less than that in invoice . Also .... thet total of mat A Inv a/c & Pr diff a/c is 500/- that is total unpalnned del cost.
    are the entries correct ?
    What is the reason the price diff account is getting hit for mat B
    also how can i make the unpanned delivery cost hit inv account all the time ??
    I tried making PRD rule valuation class specific & tried assigning inv accounts to it . BUT THE
    SYSTEM DID NOT ALLOW ME TO SAVE SAYING THE ACCOUNT IS ALREADY USED IN BSX.
    PL GIVE UR INPUTS

  • How VBDPR-WERKS gets populated while invoice creation

    Hi
    I have two orders for which i am taking the invoice printing.
    For one order , order type is SERAand for the other SERV.
    For SERV order type the field VBDPR-WERKS is getting populated in the print program where as for SERA order type this field is not getting populated.
    Can anyone please any reason behind this..Is there any config issue in this..
    Thanks in advance
    Rgds,
    Sukanti

    Hi Gaurav,
    first if some deletes the condition record for a paricular condtion record,then ask ur users to uopdate the prices by goin to the condition screen.
    second create a pricing procedure determination for your billing type in t code ovkk
    and in that pricing procedure just maintain the settings as per mentioned by Mr.Lakshmipathy.
    Revert if helpful
    l
    Mohit Singh

  • Problem while invoice verification :LMR1M001

    Hi,
    I am using enhancement assignment LMR1M001 to check MIRO document postings, for this I have written code in function module exit (EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010) include ZXM08U16.
    When i checked in development server its getting triggred but in production when i check with session break point, control does not reach the include.
    Please help me solve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Sai.

    Hello Gurus ,
                                 I am also facing the same problem in am also working on same LMR1M001 , i write code but it is not executing .
    I simply want to print an error massage when the material is in Quality control stock .
    Is there any other way to do it help me .                                                                               
    Thanks and Regards                                                                               
    Shrikant Ambulkar

  • OPM Actual Costing (PMAC) not including AP Invoice transactions

    Hi,
    OPM Actual Costing (PMAC) not including AP Invoice transactions in 12.1.3 version. We have set profile GMF:Include Receipts in Actual Cost = 0, GMF:Include Invoices in Actual Cost = 1 still AP Invoice not included in OPM Actual costing.
    Observed, Invoices which has IPV are shown as in Actual transaction view with line source as "Invoice Price Variance". I was looking for a line source with "AP invoice" and "IPV"(if exisits) in Actual transaction view screen.
    Thanks,
    Solomon.

    Hi,
    did you run the extract AP charges request ?
    thanks .
    Ahmad.

  • GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification

    Dear Gurus,
    I have made a PO for 1200 pcs unit price 69.20$.  (GR based IV).   (Valuation - Moving average price)
    Delivery costs - Freight (FRB1) - 1200$
    I have splitted the PO quantity in to 3 different Inbound deliveries
    Inbound 1 - 400 pcs
    Inbound 2 - 400 pcs
    Inbound 3 - 400 pcs
    I have made the Goods receipt for the 1st Inbound - 400 pcs.
    Goods Receipt 1 - 400 pcs.  The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c credited by 400$
    Invoice Verification1 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice verification is 1000$.
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c debited by 1000$
    Goods Receipt2 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 400$
    Invoice Verification2 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 2000$
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 200$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1800$
    Goods Receipt3 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 200$
    Invoice Verification3 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 1500$
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 133.33$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1366.67$
    I don't understand how the logic works for seggreating the amount to GR/IR freight clearing account and GR/IR account.
    For the first 2 GR and IV I could understand that there is a  balance in the PO condition but for the Invoice verification 3. The value debited to GR/IR freight account is 133.33$. Can anyone help me how the calculation is taking place and how the system has arrived to figure 133.33$ in the Invoice verification for GR/IR freight clearing a/c
    Strangely when I have cancelled the Invoice Verification document 3.
    The value Credited to GR/IR freight clearing account is 333.33$ instead of 133.33$
    Can somebody help me to figure out the calucation for IR after the GR for planned delivery costs.
    If any SAP notes or help files can be provided then it would be really helpful.
    Regards
    Fazal.

    Refer this note 311496 & 460244, 129066
    Symptom
    Delivery costs were planned for a purchase order item.
    A goods-receipt-based invoice verification is set.
    Several goods receipts are posted. For invoice entry, both in conventional invoice verification (transaction MR01/MRHR) and in logistics invoice verification (transaction MR1M/MIRO), the delivery costs for each purchase order item are displayed in total.
      This is the same as when, for example, only one of several GR documents/delivery notes is selected.
    Example of a purchase order history:
    Cat. Doc. no.    Itm    MvT Pstg.dt.            Qty.in BUoM       Value in local curr
    GR   5200002605 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5  PC         50,00 DEM
    GR   5200002606 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5  PC         50,00 DEM
    Sum of goods receipts                      10  PC        100,00 DEM
    DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           3,33 DEM
    DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           5.00 DEM
    DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           3,33 DEM
    DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           5.00 DEM
    Total delivery cost GR                                                 16,66 DEM
    If you only select the first GR document in the selection, you get
    the following default values for the delivery costs:
    Amount    Quantity  BUoM Itm  Decription              Vendor
    6,67         10      PC  10    Freight value        VEND01
    10,00        10      PC  10    Freight/quantity     VEND01
    (and not, as sometimes expected: -  3,33 DEM    5 PC
                                        -  5,00 DEM    5 PC)
    Other terms
    WEBRE, delivery costs, planned delivery costs, goods-receipt-based invoice verification, invoice verification
    Reason and Prerequisites
    A function such as the goods-receipt-based invoice verification is not available for delivery costs.
    Solution
    This is not an error; this is a consulting note.

  • Invoice Verification for IMPORT PO(ASSET)

    Hi All,
    User has created Purchase order against Import Material for asset with Account Assignment category as A.While invoice verification for basic customs duty,ECS and HSES, system debiting the GL account for Asset instead of CenVat clearing.
    In case of PO against import material for asset with out account assignment category as A, system debiting the cenvat clearing account accurately.
    Current Accounting Entry
    Commissioner Of Customs Credit
    Asset under construction(CWIP) Debit
    Required Account Entry
    Commissioner Of Customs Credit
    Cenval Clearing - Debit
    Customs deposit a/c - Debit
    It is bit urgent.Please provide the solution.
    Santosh

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories > Here for "A", remove "GR Non-Valuated" indicator and then try.
    If it is not working for old PO then create new PO and then try.

  • Actual costs posted to work order without maintaining costing variant

    hi,
    i havent maintained costing variant for work order(maintenance order) type i used to create the work order. so when i posted goods issue, how does the actual costs get posted with out maintaining the costing variant for work order type. what is the role of costing variant configuration in work order type settings.
    thanks,
    monica

    Hi monica,
    Costing variant forms the link between the application and Customizing, since all cost estimates are carried out and saved with reference to a costing variant. The costing variant contains all the control parameters for costing.
    The configuration parameters are maintained for costing type, valuation variants, date control, and quantity structure control.In costing type we specify which field in the material master must the price be updated,
    In valuation variant we specify in what order the system should go about accessing prices for the material master planned price, standard price, moving average price etc. Further which is the price which should be considered for activity price. How the system should select BOM and routing.
    assign points if useful
    Regards
    Genie

  • Table for Production order planned and Actual cost

    Hi Experts,
    Can anybody please tell me the name of table where Production order planned and Actual cost gets saved ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Bijay

    Table COEP
    don't forget the points

  • Invoice verification number ranges

    Hi
    After processing a payment in MIR7, document number 5100519088 was assigned. When user processed the next payment 51000519063 was assigned. Can some one explain how these document numbers are being allocated, Normally the documents numbers are allocated in a sequential order..
    Checked in ILV number ranges, for all document types it is taking only one number ranges i.e 51.
    For creation and reversal invoice document it also taking same number ranges i.e 51
    Please help me to understand why it is not taking number ranges sequence wise ( only for 6 invoice documents)
    Thanks
    Andappa

    Hi,
    there can be various reasons for the gaps in invoice numbering.
    Please review the following notes in relation to gaps in numbers used:
    62077   Info: Internal number assignment is not continuous
    193020  Invoice verification: Gaps in number assignment
    175047  Causes for FI document number gaps (RF_BELEG)
    Main reason for numbering gaps is buffering. This is also described
    in attached note 62077.
    Document numbers can get lost in invoice verification if after choosing
    the 'Post' function (F11 or Ctrl+S) the system generates an error
    message or a termination message. In this case instruct users to pay
    attention to whether the system generates terminations or error messages
    after choosing post (F11 or Ctrl S). Ask them to note the message ID and
    the numbers, preferably together with the time. It is worth discovering
    a procedure, peculiar to your company or system configuration, that
    causes the system to generate other error or termination messages after
    posting (that is after number assignment). This should not normally be
    the case. All this is explaind in note 193020.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • IW32  needed Plan Cost and Actual Cost table name

    Hello ,
    In IW32 transaction Plan Cost and Actual cost in cost tab ---Table Name.
    Req: needed  plan cost & actual cost table names  for particular order number.( For New Report )
    Can you please let me know where Plan cost & actual cost get stored in IW32 in Cost tab ( table name / function module name ) or how its get calcualted for particular order number.
    Thanks in advance !
    Regards
    Rahul

    hi ,
    i too had same issue , i wrote following FS for that :
    Actual and planned cost  from PMCO-WRT00 to WRT12(the sum of values should be considered for actual as well as planned ) for  PMCO-OBJNR taken from CAUFV -OBJNR for order number  AFIH-AUFNR  and also currency from CAUFV-WAERS .
    Actual cost will have valuation type PMCO-WRTTP = 4 and planned cost will have valuation type  PMCO-WRTTP = 1 , which will be placed in different column
    hope this helps
    regards
    satish

Maybe you are looking for