Actual Cost of Prodcution

Hi ,
This is regarding Actual cost calculation.
I have three material X - RAW MATERIAL, Y-SEMIFINISH MATERIAL, Z-FINISH MATERIAL.
X=Stand. price Rs.10
Processing cost Rs.10
Y= Stand. price Rs.25
Processing cost Rs.10
When i produce Y , Cost will be = 10 (X) + 10(processcost)= 20 RS.
So actual Price during prodcution is 20 , but it taking 25 (Standerd price of Y) in next step for production of Z (25+10=35 Rs.)
So its coming wrong picture...it should take 20 Rs. What i have to do for getting actual cost after prodcution.
Whre i can see this comparision ???
Please Suggest
Regards
DHIRAJ

Hi,
Please refer the below steps.
1. Creation of Production Order with account assignment as WBSE
2.Production Order Confirmation on completion of manufacturing of material
3. Settlement of Production Order to respetive materials / WBSE based on business requirments.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Rakesh Pradhan

Similar Messages

  • Acual Cost of Prodcution

    Hi ,
    This is regarding Actual cost calculation.
    I have three material X - RAW MATERIAL, Y-SEMIFINISH MATERIAL, Z-FINISH MATERIAL.
    X=Stand. price Rs.10
    Processing cost Rs.10
    Y= Stand. price Rs.25
    Processing cost Rs.10
    When i produce Y , Cost will be = 10 (X) + 10(processcost)= 20 RS.
    So actual Price during prodcution is 20 , but it taking 25 (Standerd price of Y) in next step for production of Z (25+10=35 Rs.)
    So its coming wrong picture...it should take 20 Rs. What i have to do for getting actual cost after prodcution.
    Whre i can see this comparision ???
    Please Suggest
    Regards
    DHIRAJ

    Hi,
    Please check with below report
    KKBC_ORD
    Check with individual cost element for proceesing cost & raw material Cost.
    Maybe ur Actual production cost will be  higher than the Planend cost
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • Actual Cost of finished goods in MIGO

    Hi,
    The value of Finished material in FI Document generated in MIGO takes the (Goods Receipt Quantity) X (Planned/Moving average Price from material master), Where as it should take the Total Actual Price calculated after Order Confirmation Based on Actual Material Purchase Price & Actual Activity Posting Value.
    For example:
    Present scenario
    Material-> MIGO QTY>Moving Avg Price -->MIGO FI Document Value
    Finished> 1000  EA> Rs. 10/ EA--
    >Rs. 10,000=00
    Required Scenario:
    MIGO FI Document value= (Purchase Value of Raw Material)+ ((Activity Posted while Confirmation)X(Activity price))
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    What u said is right Mr Kapil.. See when u do GR From Production Order System Calculate Moving Price or Planned Price from
    material Matser .
    As per ur Reuirement u told it should calculate (Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD).
    it is possible only when order quantity is less , suppose say your order qty is 150 mt per day and your Plant capacity is 500mt
    per day production will be done in a half day, sale can be done on same day after Production with the formula what u told.
    If suppose say , Your order is 2000 ton of Oil , it will take u to complete 4 days for your Total production as you told, GR should
    be done on (Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD) formula, you dont know exact activity price for 2000 ton until u finish your total
    production, at the same time until u do GR sales cannot be done. So in SAP Gr is intially done on Moving Average Or Planned
    (Standard Price) , After totla Prodcution GR is Compared with Actual Cost(Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD)= :"Variance".
    Plus are MInus is Reduced or added to Finished Goods Account or PP account during Settlement.
    If any wrong Pls Correct me Experts,
    Pavan

  • Actual cost are not updating in prodcutcost collectors ( KKF6N) - Variances

    Hi SAP's
    We are facing the problem with the Variance calculation for product cost collectors.
    The issue is When we are calulating the Variances for prodcut cost collectors the actual costs are not ( For few materials of BOM) updating.
    Because of these the variances are showing high.....If I settele this variances to COPA, my copa report is will be going wrong.....
    Please help me to comeout of this problem.
    Thanks in Advance
    PrasadReddyS
    FICO Consulatnt

    Hi Anand
    Please add the budget profile at Plant maintenance order level no need to add any substitution rule
    budget should also be control at order level
    Thanks
    trinath 

  • Actual cost of product in COPA

    Dear all,
    I am relatively new to COPA functionality.
    The requirement is that actual cost of product should be reflected in COPA and not the planned.
    Kindly give me the background also, as in the integration of COPC and COPA.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Sudhakar is completely right in his comments. But, I would not just accept that actual costing is not active, so you have to find a solution without it. Your requirement is a good reason to activate actal costing, and calls for it.
    The way SAP foresees to bring actual costs into CO-PA would be:
    Activate material ledger / actual costing
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/a5/320e28d56c11d295c200a0c930328a/frameset.htm]
    Calculate periodical actual prodcut costs at period end
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/ec/f835d7f08311d185810000e8a4bacc/frameset.htm]
    Revalue CO-PA at actual costs with KE27
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/f5/0f0739edfcb03ae10000000a11402f/frameset.htm]
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/7a/4c39be4a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
    That brings you a completely integrated and accurate solution for actual product costs in CO-PA
    best regards,
                  Udo

  • Report  for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item

    Dear Experts,
    Is there any standard tcode for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item level for the month.
    there is one tcode s_alr_87013127 but user has to double click in order to get line item details.
    I want to see line item wise breakup/bom wise target and cost cost as well as qty.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards
    RK

    Dear experts,
    I am still looking for a revert.
    regards
    RK

  • Posting Actual Costs at Material Level

    Hi All
    For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
    However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
    Thank you

    Hi
    Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
    During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
    However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Break Up of Actual Costs in a report for list of orders

    Hi All,
    SAP standard reports displays only the total planned & total actual costs.
    Is there any standard report available which can display break up of planned & actual costs along with total costs, for list of orders (e.g: time, material and external resources consumption).
    Thanks in advance
    JK

    hi
    you can find the material cost,external service etc in the standard cost report itself select the change layout and select the items you want to display ,you can get the result
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • PS (plan vs actual costs) Report

    Hi,
    I have to generate the above report. How can I diffrentiate between Plan cost and actual cost. Is there any business contect report for this ? can anybody throw light on this.
    Regards,
    Bill

    Hi Bill,
               There is no std content for this as far as I know , Not sure if your report is based on cost for a given version then its really a mystery . If you are looking to pull the cost for PS then check the table RPSCO in r3 , this is the PS cost table , and you can differentiate Plan/Actual based on the Field Value type .
    hope this helps ,

  • Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

    Hello Gurus,
    Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
    Thanks
    RG

    Hi Raghu,
    After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
    Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
    If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
    Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
    You will be able to get the comparison...
    Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • PS - Report on Planned v/s actual cost of the project

    Hi,
    I have a client requirement on the above subject. In Report S_ALR_87013542, Under actual cost the system is taking both the Revenue and Actual cost booked on the project. Is there any other report wherein the system shows only the actual cost booked on the project so that planned V/s Actual can be compared.
    Rgds,
    Prasad

    Hi,
    You can also refer the report S_ALR_87013543 - Actual/Plan/Variance Absolute/Variance %. This will give the reports based on cost elements. Morever plan cost Vs actual cost can be obtained from Project Infosystem report (CN41/ CNS41).
    In fact the report S_ALR_87013533 is a hiecherachical report for plan & actual cost of project.
    If the system is calculating wrongly both revenue & actual cost under actual then you need to check Cost elements asignments & value category details.
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Rakesh Pradhan

  • Planned vs Actual Cost Report (with variance) for PM Orders

    Hi Experts,
    We are using the project system to collate order costs for annual shut work.  We have a requirement for a report to show 25% variance between planned and actual order costs (maintneance order).
    At this stage, we dont mind whether this is implemented in the the PM system, or the PS system.
    This is a fairly basic / common requirment.  Are there any standard transactions we could use to:
    1.  Select a list of orders using standard selection criteria.
    2.  Select a % for variance, e.g. 25%
    3.  Display a list of orders where the planned vs actual costs were greater than 25% and what the actual variance is for each order?
    Thanks,
    Maikel

    Hi Maikel,
                   I have never seen any such scenario, but the best thing that can come to me is for the shut down activities you muct have created a Revision, then based on that Revision you can take a dump of all the orders with Planned and Actual Cost, in the excel, and there by putting the formulae you can definitely have the Varience report.
    Hope it helps you.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

  • Breakdown of  COGS into ACTUAL cost components

    Hello,
    I am looking to design a product cost report which gives breakdown of COGS into actual cost components. We use moving average cost for all materials (purchased as well as manufactured) in a make to order environment.
    For example:
    Sales order - Shipped material A at COGS $100.
    Process order # 1 produced material A using input material B and a series of operations defined in a recipe.
    Process order # 1 costs: Input material B - $70
    Operations cost - $30
    Process order # 2 produced material B using raw material C and a series of operations.
    Process order # 2 costs: Input material C - $40
    Operations cost - $30
    So, the results should look like COGS 100 comprise of $ 40 material cost and $ 60 operations cost.
    I understand standard cost estimates can be linked to CO-PA fields to get cost component structure. But, we don't use standard costing. We use CO-PA which gives COGS.
    Is there something similar to cost estimate to calculate as above? Or, this is a custom development.
    Thanks in advance for any pointers / advice?
    Sanjiv Agrawal

    What is COGS?

  • Getting diffrent Actual cost from 0PM_OM_OPA_2 to 0pm_c01 and 0pm_c07

    Hi All,
    I am using BI report for plan and actual cost deviation of Work order(maintenance order) of PM(tcode iw33>cost tab>plan actual cost to check),
    question there is 2 query for this plan actual cost deviation, one on 0pm_c01(Maintenance Orders - Costs and Allocations) and second on 0PM_C07 Maintenance Orders: Scheduling, datasource is common 0PM_OM_OPA_2 for actual cost population in this cubes, BUT update rule are diffrent for both target,
    in 0pm_c07 its getting update by 0pm_ds04(dso) where we are getting only Actual cost with Debit(S) Entery(as debit(S) entery hardcoded at start routine in update rule from this datsource to 0pm_ds04), for report on 0pm_c07actual cost is matching with standard ecc report MCI8 - PMIS: Cost Analysis.
    in 0pm_c03 we are getting all Actual cost entry both Debit(S) and Credit(H), getting actual cost total as debit minus credit entry at cube 0pm_c03 and hence getting same on report on that, this report is same as like report on 0pm_c07.
    both report are calculating Actual vs Plan cost relation ship, but one report(on 0pm_c07) have only debit(S) entry while other report(on 0pm_c03) have both Debit and Credit entery, So getting diffrent  Actual cost at both report hence diffrent Actual VS plan Cost relationship from both report,
    Both are standard report given by SAP, Now which report we have to take it as correct one? which report is right?
    Regards,
    Dushyant.

    Hi,
    Sorry, In my pain post whereever i written 0pm_c03 is wong its 0pm_c01,
    as u said ur query on 0pm_c01 works fine? are u getting Debit(S) and credit(H) both entery for actual cost in this cube?
    as in 0pm_c07 we are gettin only debit(S) entery and this report matching with standard ecc reprot( as i mentioned in main post ) BUT for 0pm_c01 its have both S and H entery. if ur actual/plan cost report on 0pm_c01 have S and H entery for actual cost than with ECC report you are reconciling?
    Dushyant.

  • Fixed and Variable Breakup of Actual Cost

    We have implemented Material ledger and also activated actual cost component split. We are getting the actual product cost at month end. In the costing cockpit we get the Peiodic unit price(Actual cost) as well as std price of the material. But In costing cockpit we are not able to get the breakup of Fixed and variable. Whereas we are getting Fixed and varible breakup when we check cost component report in ckm3. But there, we can see individual material wise fixed and varibale breakup.
    Can anybody help me so that I can see the Actual Fixed and variable cost for all the products at a time?
    With regards
    Mukesh Poddar

    Fixed price, is the fixed costs - I usually see it in relation to Overhead..
    Fixed costs remain, whether you manufacutre or not.
    Say you are deciding whether to out-source an assembly,  If you outsource, VARIABLE cost will be saved, Material, labor for that assembly, Overhead representing fringes for that labor, the electricity to run that specific machine.  However, you will still have fixed costs of: Management Salary (although some of that can be variable); insurance on the building; heating and cooling for the building; realestate taxes.
    If the cost to make "in house" is 150 each and the vendor is going to charge you 100, thi is only a true saving if your fixed costs are less than 50.
    SAP allows you to separate fixed and variable costs so that you do make/buy analysis, budgeting, etc
    Hope this helps
    Edited by: Althea Madigan on May 12, 2010 2:11 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Multiple iphoto libraries and sharing (Facebook & iCloud)

    Hi All, I have split my iPhoto library into two separate libraries - one for work photos, one for personal photos. This all works nicely and I'm happy with how it went. I have a question about sharing photos though...does the sharing I've set up with

  • Trouble with 1080p on MacOS but no Windows

    the maximum I can get out of my intel 20" iMAC with MacOS is 720p. I get some flickering at 1080p. The 59.9HZ option is greyed out and only 60HZ can be used. (incidentally this used to happen with old powermac which had an ATI 9800 and it would flick

  • Resize cl_gui_dialogbox_container SIZE_CONTROL

    Hello, In most object oriented languages I can catch an event using the signal to execute some process. Typical events like mouse clicks and mouse movements are usually implemented. So are resizing events for windows ... I a beginner in ABAP OO progr

  • I bought adobe creative suite 6 design and web premium

    at the beginning of the year and i am trying to install it now, it is asking me for a 19 digit number as a redemption code, but i can not find this. HELP

  • Single Iview for Multiple JSPDynPages

    Hi, In my Iview I have multiple JSPDynpages, I created iview selecting one of them. The actual design is that I have couple of JSPDynPages in my application and I took one of them and created the iview, and took it as the main page of application, no