Actual data different during confirmation

Hi all
I confirmed first operation with yield of 800pc out of production order of 1000 pc and put 200pc as scrap. Now during confirmation of second operation the actual data should be 800 for yield but the system showing 1000pc. What are the settings that system will show as required.
Regards
roshan

Hi,
Pl. check ur entries in "Parameters for order confirmation - opk4". In the control data tab, check ur entry in " generated confirmations without qty. adjustments".
If don't set that indicator, then the scrap qty. will be taken into account.
Regards,
Jeyaraman.R

Similar Messages

Provide brings back the actual date , different to the table content

Hi,
I´m not a developer, but must do that part now in my company.
We have a 46C with actual packages.
In a customer report I have to add 2 fields to an output.
It selects from PNP and provides data like follows:
GET PERNR.
PROVIDE * FROM P0000
FROM P0001
FROM P0002
FROM P0006
FROM P0007
FROM P0013
FROM P0016
FROM P0053
    BETWEEN PN-BEGDA
        AND PN-ENDDA.
That worked fine.
Now I liked to set 2 fields with contents of IT 0000 (table PA0000):
    IF P0000-MASSG = '01'.            " MA aktuell im Vorruhestand ?
     TRANS-BEGVORRST = P0000-BEGDA.
     TRANS-ENDVORRST = P0000-ENDDA.
    ENDIF.
At debugging I can see, that the requested fields from P0000 are set to the actual date, not to the value I can select from table or shown in the SAP transaction.
All other fields from PA0000 are matching the row I expect, but not the date fields
Any idea?

Hi,
That is the behavior of PROVIDE statement. If you combine (JOIN) several tables (P0001, P0002, etc) together, it will give you all the intersected dates.
For example, in two tables itab1 and itab2, the respective columns col1 and col2 are interval limits of type i. The filling of the internal tables results in the following intervals (rows two and three):
|   Itab1 Int1    |     |Itab1 Int2 |     |
|        |      Itab2 Int1       |        |
| |          ... BETWEEN ...             |
| | i1 |   i2   | i3 |   i4   |i5|     | <<<< This is the result
Regards,
Lim...
Edited by: Ruslim Chang on Apr 17, 2009 11:26 AM

WBS Forecast dates disappears during scheduling after final confirmation

Hi dear Experts.I faced a problem with WBS dates.
The system overwrites forecast and basic dates on WBS after final confirmation of attached activities. And start to schedule wbs dates from dates of activities with no confirmation. Is there any way to solve this prolem?
In other words i need my WBS to take into scheduling ALL the operations forecast date. Moreover how the system can overwrite the forecast dates wich were entered manually by user?
Green - actual dates
Yellow (orange) - forecast dates
Bue - Basic dates
Please help.

Hi Kirill,
Please check the control parameters for WBS Scheduling. Check if the scheduling method over here is WBS Determines Dates. If this is the case, irrespective of the scheduling that was carried out at the activity level, the system overwrites the basic and forecast dates present at the WBS level. May be in your case the scheduling method that had been used was "Network determines dates".
. Please change this and let me know if this helps.
Regards
Varun

Actual dates from confirmed activities are not rolled up to wbs

Hi
In my Business Scenario, I need Project Definition, WBS, and Network
header to derive dates from activities assigned to them. I indicate the
Project definition start date and rest of the schedule need to happen
which is achieved through config i have done
I have created a project with two WBS and one network attached to
project definition. 4 activities of the network are attached to these
WBS
When I have done the scheduling, the basic dates are properly
calculated for Project Definition, network header and WBS
Now I have released the project and started confirming the activities.
After complete conformation of 1st activity, i have schedule the
project to see the dates. Now the dates of Project Definition, network
header and WBS are derived by the activities which are not confirmed.
Ideally the basic dates of Project Definition, network header and WBS
are to be derived from activities confirmed and yet to be confirmed the
way the basic dates are derived before confirmation.
As a result of this the basic dates are showing wrong dates which are
derived from unconfirmed activities
Warm regards,
Ramakrishna

Hi,
This is standard system behaviour.
Basic dates at WBS level do not change based on activity confirmation. However, actual dates at WBS level get updated from network activities based on confirmation.
"Tentative actual start date for WBS element" and "Tentative actual finish date" get updated from activity confirmation in the case of WBS with activities assigned to it.
This tentative dates can later be transferred as actual dates.
Basic dates do not get automatically updated based on confirmation of activities
Muraleedharan.R
091 9880028904
[email protected]

Actual dates are altered during schedule calculation

I've had an unusual problem the last couple times I've calculated a P6 schedule. Actual dates from a prior update are being changed. It's random. Also, a few activities without progress (scheduled to start a couple weeks in the future) are randomly given actual starts a few weeks in the past.
I can deal with activities that are given actual dates when they shouldn't. But, I don't want to deal with actual dates changing after doing a schedule calculation.
If you're puzzled at what I'm talking about, here's an example.
Activity X has an actual start date of 07Feb11 and is not complete. It's scheduled completion date is 31March11. There are no out of sequence errors, or other errors, because everything was cleaned up. A schedule update is done and the activity finish is given an actual finish date of 07Apr11, and the schedule is calculated.
After it is calculated, the actual start date is changed from 07Feb11 to 01Apr11.
This has happened to a few activities (random), and the changes to actual dates is also random.
What's going on?

Are the activities or resource assignments set to Auto Compute Actuals?

Restriction to delete goods movement data during confirmation thru CO11N

hello all
Please let me know how to prevent the user to delete the rows in goods movement screen during confirmation through transaction CO11N ,as users are able to confirm without goods issue by deleting that rows.
Should we contact basis person for the same
with regards

Dear,
Please refer my reply in this thread,
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=16368869&messageID=6047820
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=16368869&messageID=6151829
Try using transaction variants. There is a utility called GUIXT in transaction. You can write code to add a pushbutton on the desired screen by using the GUIXT. The coding syntax is provided in the SAP application help. Use transaction SHD0 to create the variants.
http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/Implement_a_screen_exit_to_a_standard_SAP_transaction
Hope it will help come back if any problem.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Original dates in comparison of actual dates

Hi Experts
I have a project with certain activities and partily executed (few activities are confirmed and partially confirmed).
For the finally confirmed activities, the planned earliest and latest dates if activity are matched with actual dates.
To have an analysis of planned and actual dates, how to retain the original dates?
Over a period of time, i have incerted new activities. To enable bringing these activities in schedule, i need to re-schedule the project.
But, the origjnal schedule also will get rescheduled. I am looking for retaining the original schedule despite repeated reschedules for the purpose of future analysis.
Generally, the project progress in gantt chart (general business requirement) is monitored with out deviating the original schedule.
Require comments by experts.
warm regards
ramSiva

Hi Mahendra
My scheduling scenario is bottom up, because the individual activities and procurement lead times will decide the actual planning for each WBS.
So, as you suggested, once after complete structuring and initial scheduling, i will transfer the basic dates to forecast dates.
Then onwards i will keep reschedule after confirmation / partial confimation / addition of new activities. Is this method keeps the forecast dates unchanged forever and gives information on iniital schedule?
During intermittent rescheduling, will the forecast dates get affected as like basic dates (due to my scenario bottom-up)?
warm regards
ramSiva

Actual dates should not impact the Network scheduled dates

Hi
I have planned schdeuled dates (Early/latest).
When i am confirming the activity the actual dates get updated
When i schedule the network the scheduled planned dates are recalulated
This should not happen for this client i am working for
The requirement is that the Planned Scheduled should remain fixed and
should only change if duration, relationship etc changes.
I have tried different option to solve this but still no clue
Adjust basic date 1, 2, 3 option
Shift Order
No date Update - this seems to work but not visible in CN22/CN25/CJ20n
Kindly highlight if any of you have come with similar requirement & provided solution to it
Either thru standard functionality, configuration or any development
Cheers

Hi Manoj,
I had the same requirement and able to achieve it by std. settings. Keep in mind that the planned dates wil get changed when you do the final confirmation. You should have the control on the planned dates until the activity get Fianlly confirmed.
psconsultant

Choosing among similar PRT records during confirmation

Within our assembly line, there are workcenters that contain multiple similar pieces of equipment that are not capacity controlled by the system. For example, a specific operation is carried out by using 1 of 3 identical machines. We would like to be able to record which specific piece of equipment was used at the time of confirmation. Each of the three has its own equipment record yet only one is used to carry out the operation.
What is the best way to structure the routing/workcenter for this requirement? If I assign all 3 equipment records as PRTs on the routing, the system effectively thinks I am using all 3 for the operation. I would like the ability to have visibility to all 3 as being possible and then during confirmation prompt the user to specify which of the actual equipment records was used. Is there any way to capture this during confirmation other than via system enhancement?
Thanks!

I was hoping to model each equipment record as its own PRT rather than as its own work center. Is it not possible to conditionally capture PRT usage independent of work center? Our work center in this context is set up more to track labor costs/capacity and the equipment records are utilized for historical usage reporting purposes (not using PM). We are using our work centers to represent employees rather than machines and am concerned with the amount of data redundancy required if we were to model multiple work centers that are identical other than equipment assignment.

How to differentiate b/w Plan and actual data

Hi,
How to differentiate b/w plan nad actual data.
Is that value type or Version InfoObject??
What should be the value for that and how it gets populated ??
Regards,

Hello Tapan,
The plan and actual data is differentiated on the basis of value of infoobject 0VTYPE. Value 10 is for actual. Different plan versions can be differentiated by different values of infoobject 0VERSION.
These values are populated when actual data is loaded or plan data is entered.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Praveen

Date label in mail app on iPad not same as actual date in email header

Hello everyone
I've been experiencing some problems with my iPad's email, the date label (displayed in blue) when viewed in the list of emailed received, doesn't correspond to the actual email's date as displayed in the email's header. For example, when viewing the list of emails, the blue label shows the date as 'Yesterday' when the actual date the email was received at was 4 days ago! This also happens in a different way, the label shows 'Sunday' when the day it was received on was in fact Wednesday..this is becoming quite annoying as it keeps pushing the old email along with the emails that were actually recently received.
I'd appreciate any suggestions for solving this issue..
thanks!

yes I have, also checked the time zone, just to be sure ;-)
it just happened suddenly and I'm not quite sure what triggered it..
anyway, thanks for your response.. I'd love to hear any other suggestions you might have..

Posting date and clearing date different in G/L clearing document

Hi Friends,
While clearing a G/L manually using F-03, the clearing date is entered in the selection screen.
The clearing document which is posted is posted with the posting date same as the clearing date mentioned in the selection screen of F-03.
In what situations can the posting date of a G/l clearing document be different from the clearing date?
Regards,
Shilpi

Hi,
The Clearing Date in F-03 is actually the Posting date, so in this case the posting date will be same as clearing date. But a clearing document can also be created when you reverse a FI document, in this case the Reversal document will have a clearing date different than posting date. Let me know if this info helps you

Auto release of Invoicing plan item when milestone actual date is entered

Hi all,
I wonder if anyone can help me on this. I have configured the system to automatically release an invoicing plan in a PO once the milestone attached to that invoicing plan is confirmed in the project by entering the actual date. For some reason though, when trying to enter the invoice for this item in MIRO, the amount from the invoicing plan is not copied. The amount only gets copied if you enter the PO in change mode after confirmation of milestone, display the invoice plan for each item then save before exitting. It is only after this that the block on the item is removed. Is this supposed to be so? I would have thought immediately after confirmation of milestone by indication of actual date, the block on the invoicing plan will be immediately be removed so the invoice can immediately copy the amounts from the PO? Any ideas how to achieve this? (GR is not a part of the process).

Hi,
Go through this link. Might be helpful.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/InvoicingPlanin+SAP
You can also search for related content in the forum. You will find a lot of threads related to this.
Regards,
Gokul

Automatic change of Work Center during Confirmation.

Happy New Year to all!
Just want to ask if anyone of you encountered the scenario during confirmation in which the backflushed work center was changed. The user claims that they did not do any changes during confirmation nor did they change manually the order itself. The confirmation happened last December and they only noticed it this month when they were checking the reports.
I did not configure their system so that they can change the Work Center during confirmation. By default, the work center is grayed out during confirmation.
Hope to hear from some of you soon!
Thanks and regards,
jLmendoza
Edited by: John Luis Mendoza on Jan 4, 2011 3:15 AM

Dear
If your production order operations are re-scheuled and dispatched after Capacity Avalaiblity check in cm21/cm22/cm31 etc , then during the dispatch of operation , you have option to change Work Cnetre , time , date based on the selection option in Startgy profile (CM31/CM21-Enter the WORK CENTRE /Order ) and check wether work centre is changed.
One more option may be in Order Change in CO02-Operation Overview -Operation -Work centre -Here user may change the Work Centre .
If you have Order Change management active then you can trace the same .
Refer : Production order change history
Otherwise , there is not such confirguration in SPRO where work centre can be changed automatrically during confirmaiton because it will grade out based on the ste of confirmaiton default screen in OP00.
Hope it clarifies
Regards
JH

Best practice for Plan and actual data

Hello, what is the best practice for Plan and actual data? should they both be in the same app or different?
Thanks.

Hi Zack,
It will be easier for you to maintain the data in a single application. Every application needs to have the category dimension, mandatorily. So, you can use this dimension to maintain the actual and plan data.
Hope this helps.

Actual data different during confirmation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for