Actual Distribution FAGLGA31 (ECC6.0)

Hi All,
During creation of distribution cycle using tcode: FAGLGA31 - Create, I faced problem of having valid sender, ie: cost center in the segment creation.
In my sender/receiver tab, I can have
Senders as follows:
Account number
Business Area
Functional Area
Profit Center
Currency
Receiver:
Business Area
Functional Area
Profit Center
Question:
Why I cannot have cost center as sender and receiver?
Does anyone know any ECC6.0 (NEW GL) settings that were missed out?
Thanks.
sbmel

Hi ...
I tried to run the Actual distribution cycle FAGLGA35, and I have the follow error:
general messages for cycle 0LFBCA001 01.01.2010 ***********
Cycle 0LFBCA001, start date 20100101, does not include any senders.
General messages for segment FBCA001 ***********************
No valid sender entries were found.
Does anyone have any idea on this?
Extended error message:
==========
Cycle 0LFBCA001, start date 20100101, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0LFBCA001, starting date 20100101.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
==========

Similar Messages

FAGLGA35 - Actual Distribution in New General Ledger accounting

Dears,
In transaction FAGLGA35, system gives below mentioned messages :-
i) No valid sender entries were found. Message no. GA710.
Diagnosis
The system did not find a valid sender for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL. The problem can be due to the following reasons:
Master data checking for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL, found no valid senders for this segment.
The senders are valid from a master data standpoint, but the system found no posted values or quantities in the database corresponding to your selection criteria. The sender and the segment will be processed only if the cycle works iteratively and at least one sender in another segment receives values which it can then allocate iteratively.
In cycles for indirect activity allocation, this message appears if segment AWL is to allocate posted sender activity quantities but the sender has been completely scheduled. Complete scheduling of posted activity quantities occurs, for example, if you use cycle AWL in a test run but already used it in a current real processing run in the system.
System Response
The system cannot process the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of segment AWL in cycle 0LZAWL. In particular, check the validity of the sender master data for the settlement period.
To do so in cycle maintenance, choose "Formal check".
If segment AWL allocates posted values or quantities, the senders in the segment are valid only if:
The sender holds actually posted values/quantities not equal to 0
The cycle is iterative, and the sender receives values in another segment which it can then allocate iteratively.
If necessary, you must set the iteration indicator in cycle 0LZAWL.
In a cycle for indirect activity allocation, check whether the cycle is currently in use for posting in the system sender in segment AWL and thus completely schedules the senders in segment AWL.
If this is the case, cancel the cycle and repeat the cycle execution.
As per message solution, i do all the things but the same message comes.
ii) Cycle 0LZAWL, start date 20080401, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0LZAWL, starting date 20080401.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Is anybody have any solution. Please suggest it.
Regards,
Kalpik Shah

s_alr_87012168 : Customer Aging Report (Due Date Analysis for Open Items) this is a report generated.

Actual distribution in New-GL

When executing actual distribution in New-GL using t-code FAGLG35,
System didnu2019t generate PCA document related to it.
So I transferred FI document related to it to PCA document using t-code
1ke8.
How can I transfer FI data to PCA automatically when executing actual distribution?

Hi,
Accounting (EC-PCA) is generally intended to track the profitability of busines units, and therefore, does not automatically include balance sheet accounts. There are, however, many reasons that companies may want to record certain balance sheet items at the profit center level. Our company does this to be able to calculate net investment (AR, AP, inventory, fixed assets, etc) at the profit center level. Asset management has had a huge impact on our profitability, and being to track investment by profit center is part of that.
SAP provides a means for specifying balance sheet accounts to be tracked in PCA. This is done through customizing t-code: 3KEH - EC-PCA: Additional Balance Sheet and Profit + Loss Accounts.
3KEH allows you to set ranges of accounts to be tracked in PCA. This is generally set up during the implmentation of your SAP system, but you may find reasons to make modifications post go-live. If so, youu2019ll need to do this in your development system and transport it into production.
Possible Reasons for Modifying 3KEH
Adding new accounts outside of the ranges established in 3KEH
Deciding post go-live to track an account in PCA
Changing the Default Profit Center on an Account (Default Cost Center can be changed on cost elements in t-code: KA02)
Discovering an account that was missed during implementation. Use t-code: KE5T to compare FI balances with PCA balances.
Options for Adjusting Prior Balances
One of the big gotchas when bringing an existing account into PCA after it already has FI postings is that those postings do not automatically come over. Say youu2019ve discovered youu2019re out of balance between FI and PCA by using KE5T or some other reporting. You determine that it is a 3KEH problem, get your IT people to fix it in Dev and transport it forward. The errant account now shows up in PCA, but itu2019s still out in KE5T (PCA still shows a $0 balance). Thatu2019s because nothing happens with the old FI documents. Adding an account to PCA doesnu2019t automatically generate PCA documents for the missing FI docs, but that would be a neat trick!
So, what are your options?
9KE0 is always an option. The trick here is that the you may have missing FI docs where half of the entry was captured by PCA, while the piece youu2019re trying to fix wasnu2019t. So, now you need to make a one-sided entry to get everything square. To make one-sided entries in 9KE0, you need a document type that allows this. Configuration for this can be accomplished using t-code: GCBX. Just create a new Doc. Type and set the Bal. Check = 2 (no balance check). Thanks to Marco Jordyu2019s excellent article at FICOExpert for this tip.
Use 1KE8 to transfer FI documents to PCA. Again, Marcou2019s article has an excellent write-up on using 1KE8. He suggests that you use FBL3N to determine which documents have been posted to FI for the account you are fixing. Copy those document numbers into the multiple selection for document numbers in 1KE8, using the magical Import from text file button and Copy from clipboard. The big things to watch out for is that youu2019ll want to uncheck the u201CCheck for existing recordsu201D option and check the u201CReversalu201D option. This will prevent SAP from skipping FI documents that already have corresponding PCA documents. It doesnu2019t care that only half of the FI doc is in the PCA doc. It would skip it. Checking the u201CReversalu201D option causes SAP to reverse the existing PCA documents (most likely having only one side of the original FI docs posted) and repost the FI doc, except this time with both sides of the entry.
Final Words
This whole issue hopefully will be a rare occurance for you, but it can be a pain when it does. Particularly since you may have to wait for a fix in Dev and a transport. Itu2019s good to have a spreadsheet with your 3KEH table entries handy when youu2019re creating GL accounts. Just get your IT FICO team to send it over to help you hit those number ranges right.
Regards,
Satish Muvva.

4KE5-Actual Distribution for Profit center

I am facing the below error when I execute the 4KE5 for profit center actual distribution. I have maintained the number range but still the same error is there. I defined number range for Document type OC for year 2008.
please advise how to overcome?
"Document number: range not found
Message no. GA703
Diagnosis
An error occurred during document number determination. No range was found for number range object GL_LOCAL, sub-object TTSL.
System Response
No document number was determined. Results could not be updated.
Procedure
Inform the person in charge of number ranges."

When you enter GB02, Click on the Overview icon (Shift +F7)
You should be able to see
Subobject Element           Year             From No.               To No.            NR Status
$$$$                                                         2008                    1           9999999999                   0
                 A0
where $$$$ is your company code, 2008 or 2009 is the year for which you want the number range, along with the document type (AO)
If you cannot see this, then you have not assigned the Number Range to that document type.
Regards,
Sangeeta
Edited by: Sangeeta on Apr 8, 2009 4:57 PM

FI document on actual distribution between segments

Dear Experts
I want to do actual distribution from segment to segment.
I thought I could do it on FAGLGA35.
However, nevertheless I did activation the real-time integration,
FI document was not generated.
FI document is not generated on actual distribution between segments?
Kaneko

Hi
If you are talking about real time integration between FI and CO, please check when you define the variant, cross segment field is checked. Also,please check document type and Ledger group is defined.This variant must be assigned to company code in customizing.
Rgds
Harsh

KSV5 - Actual distribution post more than one document

Hi!
I've posted a cost center cycle actual distribution by using KSV5 transaction, cost center group and cost element group. The sys post two or more CO document insted of one and not in a progressive way. Why?
Is it a bug of the system?
Thanks
Giovanna

Hi Giovanna,
As I said, it's normal and should not pose any problem for you. Anyway, if you reverse, for example, the entire cycle results, the system will know to treat all the documents in question via the connection stroed in T811D table. The factors for creation of multiple documents could be various: number of items, controlling subkey value, auxiallary account assignment, etc.
For the 'jumping' of document numbers I wouldn't worry too much as well (though, this issue could be treated via SNR0 transaction), since it's internal CO documents and not FI. In some countries there are regulations which demand consequent document numbers, but this concerns only 'official' FI documents posted in general ledger.
Regards,
Eli

Reversal of Actual Distribution (KSV5 or 4KE5) possible?

Hi Gurus,
Would it be possibtle to reverse actual distribution of expenses or income? If yes, what is the transaction code? If no, what is the premise for this?
Thanks and best regards

hi
this KSV5 Transaction itself have Reverse option in the Main menu

Execute Actual distribution - KSV5

Hi,
Could some one tell me if there is a BAPI to execute the actual distribution. The regular way is with the transaction KSV5.
Your quick help is appreciated.
Thanks

Hello Tamma,
I have checked off Use Checkboxes and all boxes except Cross-fund and Cross-grant. The option 'Update All CO LIs" radio button to ensure all CO postings integrate back into the FI module documentation states;
Indicator:   Update All CO Line Items to FI Causes all CO line items that are generated with CO-internal allocations to be transferred into Financial Accounting. In this way, Controlling is reconciled with Financial Accounting.
Use   Setting this indicator can produce an undesirably large number of documents in Financial Accounting. SAP therefore recommends setting the indicator for test purposes only.
Would I really use this?   Anybody know how much undesirably large number of documents are produced?
Best regards

Message GA603 when I'm create a Actual Distribution Cycle

Hi,
I'm trying to create a actual distribution cycle (transaction KSV1) and when I choose "Receiver Tracing Factor" to plan percent, I receive the error message GA603.
I need to do distribution from cost center to internal order group. Firstly, I created a order group.
Could anybody help me?
Thanks,
Osmar Tardivo.

I think it has something to do with the Internal Order group selection in the Receiver values.
Have you created the Group using GS01>Creating Set>with table CCSS and field AUFNR and then assign the values of internal order which you would want to group it.
Then assign the internal order group created in receiver and try to click on the Receiving Tracing Factor...
I hope this helps.

Reg:Actual Distribution

Hi All,
FAGLGA35 - Executing the Transaction it is telling No Error and No Sender and Receiver Values...
Is it Requred for Profit Center Acivation in Controlling if i want to run above transaction...It seems like only..
Rgds
Srinu

HI,
FAGLGA35 is actual distribution in NewGL. It is used to distribute profit-center based values to other profit centers within New general ledger (prerequisite: profit-center master data,...).
So its not old profit-center accounting anymore (done in a special purpose ledger) but its integrated in NewGL tables now.
Best regards, Christian

Actual Distribution and Assesment Cycle

Dear All,
Please let me know how to create distribution and assesment cycle with transport request, please let me know any Snotes need to apply for create in non editable scenariou.

Dear All,
Please let me know how to create distribution and assesment cycle without transport request, please let me know any Snotes need to apply for create in non editable scenariou.
please note i want to create cycle in the non editable scenario without transport request.
Regards,
Rama Mohan

Actual Cost Distribution

hi experts,
i created a distribution cycle both planned and actual , but while tyring to allocate cost to desired cost center it takes into consideration only the planned value. will somebody tell me how can i allocate actual cost to the reciever cost center
regards
maryam

Hi Abdul,
You need to create the Distribution Cycle for Plan and Actual seperately. Creation of Plan Distribution Cycle - KSV7 and Creation of Actual Distribution Cycle - KSV1. Pls check if you have done it.
When you create the Actual Distribution Cycle, in each segment, you need to select the radio button "Act.Vals" under "Sender Values". Pls check if you have done this. And also check if there are any actual postings happened to the Sender Cost Centers in the cycle. (Use KSB1 transaction code).
Pls check and revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Distribution Cycle error: "No Senders have been found"

Hello,
I have created a distribution cycle in FAGLGA31 with three segments with the following criteria,
Sender:
Account, Profit Centre C postings and Functional Area YB20
Receiver:
function area YB20, profit center A: 80%
functional area YB20, profit center B 20%
Likewise I have the other 2 segments with different % of distribution.
But when I am trying to execute the cycle in FAGLGA35, i am getting the error message that "no sender has been found". Please find below the details of the error message. I have checked the cycle completely and all the relevant master data exists. Also transactional data relating to document type SA also exists in the system.
Cycle 0L2050, start date 20110101, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0L2050, starting date 20110101.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Request help on how to correct this.

Dear Latha,
the most common reason for error message GA749 in NewGL allocation is
that wrong "version" is specified in cycle header. Actual data in NewGL
is stored with version 001 (RVERS), so please make sure this value is
specified on cycle header, instead of 000, for example.
I hope this can help.
Mauri

Actual distrubution in new G/L

Hi,
I have found some documents according to those i cant use actual distribution in new GL same as EC-PCA(Profit Center) but i dont have confidance Could any budy confirm is it possible to get same thing of Actual distribution in New GL transaction code FAGLA31?
Thank you
Deepak Pawar
Edited by: Deep2408 on Dec 22, 2009 2:15 AM

HI,
With NewGL it is possible to allocate costs either using an assessment or distribution. You can go ahead and use it confidently and the transaction is mis-spelt in your post - FAGLGA31.
Why allocations are needed in FI?
Because the new GL now lets you model profit center accounting as well, allocations makes sense. For instance you want allocate overhead expenses from profit center (say dummy profit center) to other profit centers.
Refer to following page for more literature on the subject:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/2d/830e405c538f5ce10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.

CAPEX Distribution to cost centers

Dear Experts,,
We have a requirement, where, CAPEX has to be distributed in the month end between cost centers.In SAP what is the solution for this..
Our business is company code 1 provide the funds to other company codes 2,3 & 4 for both CAPEX & OPEX ..They are doing some projects at company code 2, 3 & 4 which are under construction...
Please note that we do not have PS implemented here..
Regards
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
You can better process as for your request as Actual Distribution Cycle (under new GL)
which i have done in my projects same as your requested.
FAGLGA31-Create Actual Distribution(Config)
FAGLGA47 - Run Actual Distribution Cycle
From
Cost Center Group- CC01 Cost Elemnt Group-Co Code C1
To
Cost Center Group-CC02-Cost Element Group-Co Code C2
Note: OBYA- Inter co clearing has to be set in config
Two Accoutning doc will generate: CC01-CC02 with interco clearing between the Company Codes from OBYA Config.
Regd,
Khan.

Actual Distribution FAGLGA31 (ECC6.0)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for