Actual settlement: Orders

Hello to everyone
Where could i configuration it in spro/ customizing ( the actual settlement )?
Cos when i run the transaction k08G appears values incorrects and we are thinking about that is possible that " Actual Sttlement "" is reading bad the date and we want to change it.
Any help??
thanx
Edited by: junior1108 on Nov 4, 2009 11:32 AM

Hi,
Your settlement values are defined by the settlement rules in the internal orders. SO, if you are uncertain about the values, check the rules.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Actual settlement: Orders !! help

Hello to everyone, first at all thanx.
when i am using the transaction "K08G" Actual settlement: Orders, and i recover the settlement period ( period 9 ) , fiscal year 2009 and execute it ....
Appear a quantity " 12.207u20AC " and it is wrong cos In G/L account Line item display, there are four line/ items and i can clear it 2 to 2 .
I hope the system read something wrong cos ... it four line / item have got a value date 09.2009 then in Actual settlement: Orders must be appear NILL " 0 " .
For that i need change or repair december 2008 and september 2009. Cos it items have got a document date ( 28.09.2009 and 31.12.2008 ).
How can i repair it ???? the year 2008 is close!! any idea???
thank you very much

dear Dave
thanks for your advise, we can not change the current filed customizing.
I am not able to understand why , even if in the Maintain Allocation Structures we have defined a specific Settlement Cost Elements (for exp 600019) during the actual settlement (TCODE KO8G) for some order the system doesn't respect the allocation structure definition.
some one can help me?
regards
marco

Actual Settlement Orders problem

Dear SAP GURU
when we run the actual settlement orders transaction (KO8G) for some internl order the system doesn't respect the settlement rule, the GL account is different, I mean, the right settlement should be:
CR GL Account 600019
DB GL Account Asset Under Costruction
for some internal order the system doesn't respect this rule and the posting is:
CR GL Account 600010
DB GL Account Asset Under Costruction
first GL account is different.
Some advise in order to understand what happen, because apparently the io master data are correct, even the settlement rule.
Maybe some can help me!
Thanks a lot
marco

dear Dave
thanks for your advise, we can not change the current filed customizing.
I am not able to understand why , even if in the Maintain Allocation Structures we have defined a specific Settlement Cost Elements (for exp 600019) during the actual settlement (TCODE KO8G) for some order the system doesn't respect the allocation structure definition.
some one can help me?
regards
marco

CLSD orders should not pick in actual settlement (CO88)

Hi
While doing settlement (CO88) it is observed that around 1800 orders were showing in u201CInappropriate Statusu201D. We have observed that all these orders status is in CLSD.
These orders were very old orders and we have already settled these orders and activated CLSD. But system is considering these orders also in present period settlement and showing these orders in u201CInappropriate Statusu201D.
We need to control this, that system should not pick CLSD status orders while doing actual settlement (CO88).
Please advice.
Thanks
RK

Hi,
Please, refer to the note 39726 - that's how the system works.
Regards,
Eli

Refurbishment order- Actual settlement

Dear Experts,
When i am trying to do actual settlement using the transaction code KO88 for the refurbishment order for which even after the techical completion and the IW8W (Goods receipt) done, system is throwing the following error:
Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed
Message no. KD258
Diagnosis
If you want to settle a production order to a material, you must first either enter the final delivery for it, or close (complete) it technically because settlement leads to an update of the moving average price for the material. The total delivery quantity is required for this. If the order is one which cannot be delivered because, for example, it produces 100% scrap, you can close it technically instead. Settlement is than to the price difference account.
By the settlement period, no final delivery had been entered for this order, nor had it been technically closed (completed). This means that you cannot settle it.
Procedure
Before settling, either set the order to "Technically completed" or enter the final delivery.
Please help me out...
Regards,
Suresh.
Edited by: Suresh Babu on Jan 5, 2009 4:28 PM
Edited by: Suresh Babu on Jan 5, 2009 4:31 PM

Hi,
When i am changing the settlement period from 12 2008 to 01 2009 , it is throwing the following error:
Please throw your ideas what could be reason?
Account determination for entry 1000 PRD ____ PRF 1300 not possible
Message no. M8147
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key 1000 PRD ____ PRF 1300 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
Chart of account
Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
Valuation grouping code
Account grouping code
Valuation class
System response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
Proceed
Note
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.

RA Category for Sales Order Actual Settlement

Hi,
During production order settlement for WIP we run in every month end. Generally in tcode OKG8 (Posting Rule in WIP calculation and Result Analysis) we use RA category WIPR(Work In Process with Requirement to Capitalize) which is used production order settlement for WIP. We have done production order settlement and successfully value posted to WIP settlement gl account because in OKG8 WIPR is maintained against P&L and B&S account. After that we have done Result Analysis for Sales Order through KKA3. Value has posted to various objects under Result /analysis. Now we need to run Actual Settlement for Sales Order. In case of Sales Order Costing what should be its RA catergory for Actual Settlment : Sales Order settlment which is run through VA88.
Best Regards,
Samrat Roy

Dear Waman,
In OKG8 posting rule WIP calculation against RA category is maintained as WIPR with P&L and BS gl account. Uner Result Analysis valuation method against RA Key for Sales Order is maintained as PREL, REL, DLV, FNBL and TECO. Production order settlement has done and value has posted to WIP gl account and Quantiy has issued for delivery and billing. After the Sale billing I have done KKA3 which is Result Analysis for Sales Order. Value has posted to Sales order wip, Actual Revenue, Actual Cost, Cost of Sale, Revenu affecting net income, Planned revenue, planned cost, Planned profit and loss value shows. After that I have run VA88 and sales order wip value has posted to wip gl accounts which is set in OKG8 both P&L and BS gl account which same gl is used for production order settlment also and I created Sales Order settlement rule which is receiver in GL accounts. That GL is external settlement GL account. That external settlment receiver gl is same as sales order settlment profile's allocation structure GL. So during final sales order settlment same gl is debited and credited of calculated profit.
But I have some doubts which I requires as per business. I need Revenue Surplus(POCS), Reserve Unrealized Cost(RUCR), Revenue in Excess Billing(POCI) and variance from Result Analysis(VARR). I wanted to set this RA category in OKG8 but system does not allow me which says alrady WIPR is maintaied and value posted to result analysis. So I need to deactivate first then new RA key can be introduced..
Also I would ask you after production order settlement for wip, shall I run wip for Sales order and Sales Order settlement. or I need to to pas customer delivery and final billing. After billing I need to run WIP on sales order and sales order settlement. Basically I will run two times WIP which are production order and sales order. Our business sceanrio consists of one sales order with 29 prouction and its corresponding 29 wip which will be finally settled to Sales order external settlment gl account.
Best Regards,
Samrat roy

Actual settlement

Hi All
    My name is vivek chaubey. i am working in tata steel as a fi/co consultant.
   when i am doing actual settlement from tcode ko88. system is adding existing
   down payment amount to. actualy i made PO and GR, in that PO i used that
   internal order which i am using in ko88 too.
                                                                   I checked transaction type, allocation structure
    settlement rule. but i could not find out the solution . so please help me
      I am waiting for reply.
      vivek

dear chintan
steel i am in same problem can you help me in details. this is in production server in testing system is not picking down payment amount . even i got the advice from oss also but that is not helpfull. i checked the cost element and all setting.
                                                 Can you help me in this case .
thanks
    vivek

Wheni am tried to settle order i got error There are no accrued amounts; s

Wheni am tried to settle order i got error There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.

Hi Guru,
Details of production order
Target quantity =1,063,893      Delivered quantity =1,063,893     confirmed quantity = 1,074,945     EA     Basic start =07.04.2009     Basic finish   =01.11.2010     TECO PCNF DLV PRC GMPS MANC RESA SETC*
When i am trying to close order system gives Error messsage
000 Unprocessed future change recs for order SS50008TT/1A prevent del. fl
000 Order SS50008TT/1A is partially confirmed
Unprocessed future change recs for order SS50008TT/1A prevent del.
flag/completion
     Message no. CO688
Diagnosis
     There are still future change records or error records to be process
     from the confirmation for the confirmation processes in order
     SS50008TT/1A. Possible confirmation processes are:
     o   Automatic goods receipt
     o   Backflushing
     o   Calculation of actual costs
     o   Data transfer to HR
System Response
You are not meant to set the deletion flag/'completed' status
with future change records that have not been processed.
edure
You should process the open future change records using
o   Predefined confimration process or
o   The CORUPROC program, by dispatching it in Customizing in
    background job (dispatch background jobs: dispatching proc
Check if incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual cost ca
exist for the order, and reprocess these if necessary:
o   Reprocessing incorrect goods movements
o   Reprocessing incorrect actual cost calculations

Inappropriate Status during Actual Settlement through KO88

Hi,
We Create a Production Order 100000001, Now we are trying for Actual Settlement through KO88 transaction...
After run of this tcode, there are 5 processing categories--
Settlement Executed
No Change............................1
Not Relevant
Inappropriate Status.............3
Error
As above output, what should be the error in Actual Settlement Execution...
Please guide...

Thanks dear...
Please clear 1 thing that, for production order it is necessary that Order status should be TECO...

KO88 :Actual settelment Order

Dear All Experts,
With tcode KO88 , Actual Settelemt Order , when i execute in test mode it;s giving error
"Low value asset max.amount exceeded. No posting allowed, Message No. AA614."
It's a low value asset. My Asset value is Rs. 4600 which i want to settel.
In, SPRO I have given Amount for low value assets is Rs. 5000.
Is there anything to check for maximum amount.
Pl help me for above error message.
Regards
Swati

Hello Venkat,
Thanx for prompt reply.
Now, as per your suggestion, checked my data and my inputs are as under.
for,
1. In Specify Maximum Amount for Low Value Assets + Asset Classes , for all Depreciation Areas did you give LVA --> 1
    Here I have given Depreciation Areas LVA ---> 1.
2. In Maintain Allocation Structure -->OKO6 , in Assignments did you give IA for Assignments
    Here I have some entries in Allocation structure but could not understand 'IA for Assignment'.
3. In Internal Order, under Settlement Rule did you give FXA, ASSET NO., 100%, FULL
   Here, Given FXA, ASSET NO., 100%, AUC
4. In KO88, give Internal Order Number, Settlement Period (Current Period), fiscal year and processing type = Automatic.
   Here, given Settlement Period : 4 ,
            Fiscal Year : 2009,
            Posting Period : 4,
           Asset Value Date : 01.07.2009 and
           Processsing type = 3 Partial Capitalization.
With above inputs it's giving error message.
Pl suggest me something else to check.
Regards
Swati

What is KO8G (actual settlement )?

Dear Experts,
May I know what is the purpose of performing this K08G (actual settlement), especially for the plant maintenance work order?
Regards,
Abraham
Please, avoid asking basic questions

Hi ,
In case of plant maintainence orders , when we book the costs in form of material issue , labour cost or external services the cost gets accumulated to the order .
Actually the cost which has accumulated on the order has to be settled to either cost center or other cost object like internal order or fixed asset in case if you are using investment measure .
In order to make the status of the plant mainatainence order as Closed or business completed the cost on order should be Zero .
For making it Zero we run the settlement of order through the T code KO88 or KO8G , which settles the cost from the plant maintainece order to the settlement receiver maintained in the settlement rule .
So once so execute it the cost from plant maintainece order flows to cost center or internal order as desired , as per the settlement rule .
Once the settlement is executed then cost on order becomes Zero you can view the same in reports and hence you can then CLose the order or give it business completion .
Hope this suffices .
Regards ,
dev

Tracking the actual sale order quantity

Hi Friends,
How to track the actual sales order quantity given by the customer.
Ex: we assume the customer has placed an order of 100 units and stock is only 90 so we create the sales order for 90 units only.
How to find out the difference of 10 units as a report in standard sap system.
Thanks
AJ

Dear AJ,
This is how normal sales process works.
You create Sales Order line item for the quantity that customer has requested. (eg: 100)
Then you do a ATP for that Line item. Let's say you have only 90 in the stock. In that case system will confirm 90 for the sales order line item. (You can see the confirmed quantity in the Schedule line tab)
Normally we don't change the LI quantity as per the ATP confirmed quantity (i.e 90). Because then we loose the visibility to the customers original requested quantity (i.e 100).
Say you don't change your Line Item Order quantity to 90. Then your delivery & billing will be for 90.
So you can see in VA05, Order quantity as 100 and confirmed quantity as 90.
Your sales reports will show delivery & billing as 90. So that you have a clear visibility to the original order quantity, delivered quantity & billed quantity.
Further if remaining (open) quantity 10 is appearing your MRP & creating troubles, please use Line Item Rejection Reason as Completed. So that everything is perfect.
Coming back to your issue.
Since your changing LI quantity to 90, you cant see 100 in the VA05 report. It always show the existing sales order line item quantity, which is 90 in this example.
Only way you can find your original sales order quantity is in the Line Item / Change Log.
This can be view by selecting below Menu option.
Environment -> Changes
If you execute it for the relevant Line Item, you can see the Change log. In that by double clicking relevant quantity change line, you can see the old value & new value. (In this example 100 & 90)
But that is not a good practice to do as changes will show all quantity changes that you might do based on customer request. (Imagine if you customer ask to change it later to 95 not 100).
In that case change log will display 100 to 95, then 95 to 90. So your loosing the required visibility.
Hope this is helpful to you !

Saving as a PDF in print page order [not actual page order]?!?!

Hiya,
I've got a 20 page newsletter, each page A4, all created in InDesign CS3 [nice and simple]. I want to print the document in print page order [as appose to actual page order] on our printer here at work, because it's clever and can fold and staple to create a book/newsletter etc! In InDesign, I can obviously use the 'print booklet' option to do just this, and it works great; all my pages are printed in the correct order, I can also choose to print 2-sided, all lovely. But I was wondering if there is an option somewhere to be able to save my InDesign doc as a PDF in print page order [front with back, page 2 with 19 etc] - as printing a PDF of my artwork seems to solve a problem i was having in the thread I posted up yesterday.
Cheers guys

This is called "imposition". Does your OS and InDesign version come with the "Print as Booklet" option?
If not, you can enter this range into the page number "Range" box on exporting:
20,1,2,19,18,3,4,17,16,5,6,15,14,7,8,13,12,9-11
(Typed from memory; -- please check)
If I then print this PDF to my HP with the options "double sided" and "2 pages per sheet", it comes out exactly the way it should.
(Waiting for the printer ... hold on.)
Well whaddoyouknow -- I got the numbering right first time. Perfect!

Audiobooks in the "music" app display tracks in alphabetical, not actual track order

Since updating my iPad 1 to iOS 5.0.1 my audiobooks (Teaching Company) display in the "music" app in alphabetical, not actual track order. They display correctly in iTunes from my synced computer. I've tried designating them as compilations and not as compilations, and either way, the same result. Further, when I hit play on the first track listed, it does not go to the second track, rather it just stops.

Since updating my iPad 1 to iOS 5.0.1 my audiobooks (Teaching Company) display in the "music" app in alphabetical, not actual track order. They display correctly in iTunes from my synced computer. I've tried designating them as compilations and not as compilations, and either way, the same result. Further, when I hit play on the first track listed, it does not go to the second track, rather it just stops.

Actual settlement in tx CJ88

Hi all,
When doing actual settlement using Tx code CJ88, we are getting the following errors for different WBS:
1. Asset xxxxxxxxxxxx not in company code CEBM or
2. Either the sender is already settled, or there is nothing to settle
Please suggest how to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Nas

Is there a value on the AUC?
When you do the settlement do you use the option Partial capitalization?
Have you assign the final asset in the the settlement rule ad fill in the sub asset number 0000

Actual settlement: Orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for