Actual settlement

Hi All
    My name is vivek chaubey. i am working in tata steel as a fi/co consultant.
   when i am doing actual settlement from tcode ko88. system is adding existing
   down payment amount to. actualy i made PO and GR, in that PO i used that
   internal order which i am using in ko88 too.
                                                                   I checked transaction type, allocation structure
    settlement rule. but i could not find out the solution . so please help me
      I am waiting for reply.
      vivek

dear chintan
steel i am in same problem can you help me in details. this is in production server in testing system is not picking down payment amount . even i got the advice from oss also but that is not helpfull. i checked the cost element and all setting.
Can you help me in this case .
thanks
vivek

Similar Messages

Actual settlement: Orders !! help

Hello to everyone, first at all thanx.
when i am using the transaction "K08G" Actual settlement: Orders, and i recover the settlement period ( period 9 ) , fiscal year 2009 and execute it ....
Appear a quantity " 12.207u20AC " and it is wrong cos In G/L account Line item display, there are four line/ items and i can clear it 2 to 2 .
I hope the system read something wrong cos ... it four line / item have got a value date 09.2009 then in Actual settlement: Orders must be appear NILL " 0 " .
For that i need change or repair december 2008 and september 2009. Cos it items have got a document date ( 28.09.2009 and 31.12.2008 ).
How can i repair it ???? the year 2008 is close!! any idea???
thank you very much

dear Dave
thanks for your advise, we can not change the current filed customizing.
I am not able to understand why , even if in the Maintain Allocation Structures we have defined a specific Settlement Cost Elements (for exp 600019) during the actual settlement (TCODE KO8G) for some order the system doesn't respect the allocation structure definition.
some one can help me?
regards
marco

Actual settlement in tx CJ88

Hi all,
When doing actual settlement using Tx code CJ88, we are getting the following errors for different WBS:
1. Asset xxxxxxxxxxxx not in company code CEBM or
2. Either the sender is already settled, or there is nothing to settle
Please suggest how to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Nas

Is there a value on the AUC?
When you do the settlement do you use the option Partial capitalization?
Have you assign the final asset in the the settlement rule ad fill in the sub asset number 0000

While actual settlement to projects in CJ8G- there is an error

Hi All..
While doing the actual settlement to projects we got an error saying that - you cannot use this transaction type to post to this asset.
Is there anything i need to configure in AA.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,
Mercy

Hi,
You are getting this error as the Investment Management,Project Systems and Asset Accounting are interlinked in your client.
So you need to check:
1) whether an Investment Profile has been created for that company code
2) whether that investment profile has been linked to the project profile you are using
if both of them are yes,then
3) Have you checked as to whether an AUC been created for that project
4) If not,then you need to check for the settlement profile structure.
If every thing above has been assigned correctly,then you would not get the error.
Hope this is useful.

CLSD orders should not pick in actual settlement (CO88)

Hi
While doing settlement (CO88) it is observed that around 1800 orders were showing in u201CInappropriate Statusu201D. We have observed that all these orders status is in CLSD.
These orders were very old orders and we have already settled these orders and activated CLSD. But system is considering these orders also in present period settlement and showing these orders in u201CInappropriate Statusu201D.
We need to control this, that system should not pick CLSD status orders while doing actual settlement (CO88).
Please advice.
Thanks
RK

Hi,
Please, refer to the note 39726 - that's how the system works.
Regards,
Eli

Refurbishment order- Actual settlement

Dear Experts,
When i am trying to do actual settlement using the transaction code KO88 for the refurbishment order for which even after the techical completion and the IW8W (Goods receipt) done, system is throwing the following error:
Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed
Message no. KD258
Diagnosis
If you want to settle a production order to a material, you must first either enter the final delivery for it, or close (complete) it technically because settlement leads to an update of the moving average price for the material. The total delivery quantity is required for this. If the order is one which cannot be delivered because, for example, it produces 100% scrap, you can close it technically instead. Settlement is than to the price difference account.
By the settlement period, no final delivery had been entered for this order, nor had it been technically closed (completed). This means that you cannot settle it.
Procedure
Before settling, either set the order to "Technically completed" or enter the final delivery.
Please help me out...
Regards,
Suresh.
Edited by: Suresh Babu on Jan 5, 2009 4:28 PM
Edited by: Suresh Babu on Jan 5, 2009 4:31 PM

Hi,
When i am changing the settlement period from 12 2008 to 01 2009 , it is throwing the following error:
Please throw your ideas what could be reason?
Account determination for entry 1000 PRD ____ PRF 1300 not possible
Message no. M8147
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key 1000 PRD ____ PRF 1300 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
Chart of account
Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
Valuation grouping code
Account grouping code
Valuation class
System response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
Proceed
Note
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.

Error Message during Actual Settlement

Dear Experts,
When I am trying to execute actual settlement for a WBS Element by using transaction CJ88, as got the error message stating that "In one section there is no number. "M-0000000000-0000-00-X-X" with error message CJ608. All WBS Elements are maintained in that project with matching to coding mask which was maintained in the configuration. Please give me solution to fix the issue.
Thanks in advance,
Best Regards,
Ramalingeswar

Hi Srenivas,
Thanks for your reply.
Normally settlement rules will be deleted and recreated as per requirement. Why the system has to give this error message since 2 or 3 days and WBS Element is try to settle to-day not connected to project coding mask.
Thanks once again.
Ramalingeswar

Cj8g actual settlement ; projects/wbs elements/networks

We are every month running cj8g with variant and it is useful for settlements of costs from network>wbs>auc. We are running the variant with Project field with * option.
We are facing one issue, how can we eliminate /avoid the projects which are in having System Status with CLSD, if we dont put restriction the actual settlements are done for all the projects.
Experts please help
Thanks
srihari

Hi,
Search the forum for "Status selection profile" and you will find howit can help you in achieving this. Meanwhile, jsut to give you a start, refer transaction BS42. You can define the desired status selection profile here and use it as required..
Revert with any specific queries.
Regards,
Gokul

RA Category for Sales Order Actual Settlement

Hi,
During production order settlement for WIP we run in every month end. Generally in tcode OKG8 (Posting Rule in WIP calculation and Result Analysis) we use RA category WIPR(Work In Process with Requirement to Capitalize) which is used production order settlement for WIP. We have done production order settlement and successfully value posted to WIP settlement gl account because in OKG8 WIPR is maintained against P&L and B&S account. After that we have done Result Analysis for Sales Order through KKA3. Value has posted to various objects under Result /analysis. Now we need to run Actual Settlement for Sales Order. In case of Sales Order Costing what should be its RA catergory for Actual Settlment : Sales Order settlment which is run through VA88.
Best Regards,
Samrat Roy

Dear Waman,
In OKG8 posting rule WIP calculation against RA category is maintained as WIPR with P&L and BS gl account. Uner Result Analysis valuation method against RA Key for Sales Order is maintained as PREL, REL, DLV, FNBL and TECO. Production order settlement has done and value has posted to WIP gl account and Quantiy has issued for delivery and billing. After the Sale billing I have done KKA3 which is Result Analysis for Sales Order. Value has posted to Sales order wip, Actual Revenue, Actual Cost, Cost of Sale, Revenu affecting net income, Planned revenue, planned cost, Planned profit and loss value shows. After that I have run VA88 and sales order wip value has posted to wip gl accounts which is set in OKG8 both P&L and BS gl account which same gl is used for production order settlment also and I created Sales Order settlement rule which is receiver in GL accounts. That GL is external settlement GL account. That external settlment receiver gl is same as sales order settlment profile's allocation structure GL. So during final sales order settlment same gl is debited and credited of calculated profit.
But I have some doubts which I requires as per business. I need Revenue Surplus(POCS), Reserve Unrealized Cost(RUCR), Revenue in Excess Billing(POCI) and variance from Result Analysis(VARR). I wanted to set this RA category in OKG8 but system does not allow me which says alrady WIPR is maintaied and value posted to result analysis. So I need to deactivate first then new RA key can be introduced..
Also I would ask you after production order settlement for wip, shall I run wip for Sales order and Sales Order settlement. or I need to to pas customer delivery and final billing. After billing I need to run WIP on sales order and sales order settlement. Basically I will run two times WIP which are production order and sales order. Our business sceanrio consists of one sales order with 29 prouction and its corresponding 29 wip which will be finally settled to Sales order external settlment gl account.
Best Regards,
Samrat roy

Actual settlement: Orders

Hello to everyone
Where could i configuration it in spro/ customizing ( the actual settlement )?
Cos when i run the transaction k08G appears values incorrects and we are thinking about that is possible that " Actual Sttlement "" is reading bad the date and we want to change it.
Any help??
thanx
Edited by: junior1108 on Nov 4, 2009 11:32 AM

Hi,
Your settlement values are defined by the settlement rules in the internal orders. SO, if you are uncertain about the values, check the rules.
Regards,
Eli

Actual Settlement Orders problem

Dear SAP GURU
when we run the actual settlement orders transaction (KO8G) for some internl order the system doesn't respect the settlement rule, the GL account is different, I mean, the right settlement should be:
CR GL Account 600019
DB GL Account Asset Under Costruction
for some internal order the system doesn't respect this rule and the posting is:
CR GL Account 600010
DB GL Account Asset Under Costruction
first GL account is different.
Some advise in order to understand what happen, because apparently the io master data are correct, even the settlement rule.
Maybe some can help me!
Thanks a lot
marco

dear Dave
thanks for your advise, we can not change the current filed customizing.
I am not able to understand why , even if in the Maintain Allocation Structures we have defined a specific Settlement Cost Elements (for exp 600019) during the actual settlement (TCODE KO8G) for some order the system doesn't respect the allocation structure definition.
some one can help me?
regards
marco

Inappropriate Status during Actual Settlement through KO88

Hi,
We Create a Production Order 100000001, Now we are trying for Actual Settlement through KO88 transaction...
After run of this tcode, there are 5 processing categories--
Settlement Executed
No Change............................1
Not Relevant
Inappropriate Status.............3
Error
As above output, what should be the error in Actual Settlement Execution...
Please guide...

Thanks dear...
Please clear 1 thing that, for production order it is necessary that Order status should be TECO...

What is KO8G (actual settlement )?

Dear Experts,
May I know what is the purpose of performing this K08G (actual settlement), especially for the plant maintenance work order?
Regards,
Abraham
Please, avoid asking basic questions

Hi ,
In case of plant maintainence orders , when we book the costs in form of material issue , labour cost or external services the cost gets accumulated to the order .
Actually the cost which has accumulated on the order has to be settled to either cost center or other cost object like internal order or fixed asset in case if you are using investment measure .
In order to make the status of the plant mainatainence order as Closed or business completed the cost on order should be Zero .
For making it Zero we run the settlement of order through the T code KO88 or KO8G , which settles the cost from the plant maintainece order to the settlement receiver maintained in the settlement rule .
So once so execute it the cost from plant maintainece order flows to cost center or internal order as desired , as per the settlement rule .
Once the settlement is executed then cost on order becomes Zero you can view the same in reports and hence you can then CLose the order or give it business completion .
Hope this suffices .
Regards ,
dev

Co-product actual settlement problem

Hi Gurus,
I have a co-product problem. We have ML active.
We are going to use production orders in PP side but REM scenario in CO side. Under this condition is co-product usage effected?
Another problem is this, we have not a certain ratio between primary product and co-product. In the apportionment structure a ratio can be defined. With the creation of the production order, these ratios are going to be transferred from the material master to settlement rule.
During the production process, as I said before, the ratio is not realized, there are variances from the ratio. At the end of the period when we want to settle the order, the ratio is stable in the settlement rule. In other words, it is not actual, just planned ratios.
My question is this: Is it possible to change settlement rule during settlement in the base of realized production (101 movement type) quantities? How can we provide this, otherwise the result is not true in terms of actual costing .
Ahmet

Hi
I thnk you can specify a % in your settlement rule along with Source Structure
br, Ajay M

Actual Settlement of IO

When I tried to do KO88, i keep getting this error:-
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled". How do i prevent such errors? Can I only settle IOs with the Source structure correctly in place? Does that mean that I can only settle IOs with cost elements declared in the Source structure?
Pls advise.
Best Regards,
Ethan

Hi,
If I enter my IO in a GL line item whereby the GL is not declared in the source structure and the settlement rule of my IO also has a GL which is not declared in the source structure, then does it matter? Am I still able to settle my IO?
THE GL, IN WHICH LINE ITEM YOU HAVE ENTERED IO, SHOULD BE DECLARED IN THE SOURCE STRUCTURE. SOURCE STRUCTURE IS NOTHING BUT THE " SOURCES FOR THE VALUES, WHICH ARE TO BE SETTLED". UNLESS THE GL's OF ALL THE LINE ITEMS OF THE IO, ARE DECLARED IN SOURCE CTRUCTURE, YOU CANNOT SETTLE IO.
Sometimes when I settle my IOs, I also rcv error mesgs saying that a particular GL needs a CO assignment. Why is that so? - AM NOT CLEAR WITH THIS QUESTION.
All the best.
Santosh

Actual settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for