AD schema extension for ESSO

Friends,
Because it is necessary to extend the schema in Active Directory when you install the Logon Manager ESSO.
Thanks.

As I understand it, the main roadblock is that the Active Directory connector (essentially a directory service plug-in that translates AD-speak to Apple's internal format) doesn't computer groups, just computer lists. This could be added in future versions of the AD connector (I have no idea if there are any plans for this), but even then if you built computer groups in AD, they'd only work with Mac clients that had the newer version of the connector...
BTW, I've never seen much difference between computer groups vs. lists (probably because I don't use either one very much). What extra flexibility are you wishing for?

Similar Messages

Active Directory Schema Extension for Directory Synchronization - ADFS 3.0, Office 365

Hi Team,
We are in a situation with extending the schema for one customer so that these additional exchange attributes may be utilized. They have a single data center where the Primary Domain Controller resides and have multiple remote sites each of which have Additional
Domain Controllers installed.
As recommended by Microsoft, I am going to extend the Active Directory Schema with Exchange Setup so that I can leverage targetaddress attribute from Local AD to set primary email address when directory synchronization happens.
My Query: Do I have to extend the AD Schema with Exchange from each of these ADC's? Or the changes I make on any of them will replicate over the others also?
Note: The customer will be using ADFS 3.0 'Single Sign On' with Office 365 and does NOT have any On-Premise Exchange deployment.

My Query: Do I have to extend the AD Schema with Exchange from each of these
ADC's? Or the changes I make on any of them will replicate over the others also?
Schema extension is done against the Schema Master. Once done, it gets replicated to other DCs with the AD forest.
For more details about Schema Extension by Exchange, you can refer to that: http://www.resdevops.com/2013/02/13/extend-ad-schema-to-allow-greater-office-365-management/
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile

Ldap schema extension to control which users / group are imported

Hello,
would like to have your opinion:
would it be a good idea to implement ldap schema extensions to control
which users / group are imported and controlled from ldap in a ldap
mastered installation?
e.g. we could implement the following schema extension for users:
attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.<iana-org-id>.1.1 NAME ( 'BogusisBeehiveUser' )
     DESC ''
EQUALITY booleanMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7
SINGLE-VALUE )
# BogusinetOrgPerson
# The BogusinetOrgPerson is derived from inetOrgPerson
objectclass     ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.<iana-org-id>.1
NAME 'BogusinetOrgPerson'
     DESC 'RFC2798: Internet Organizational Person, plus Bogus Extensions'
SUP inetOrgPerson
STRUCTURAL
     MAY (
          BogusisBeehiveUser )
Then we could control the inclusion in beehive by simply switching
BogusisBeehiveUser on or off.

sure; that's pretty much what is talked about in the Install Guide for LDAP Integration under the "inclusion and exclusion" section, about here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14897_01/bh.100/e14830/ldap.htm#CHDEFFJF
that doesn't go into the specifics of how you might want to design your objectClass schemas, though, as beehive is agnostic to that.
If you don't want to provision all users that match a certain existing rule (like everyone under dn=foo, or everyone where userType=employee), then adding a new attribute and building the profile inclusion rule around it is a valid thing to do.
richard

Active Directory schema extensions

Hi
We are in a process of implementing SAP LDAP sync to manage users from MS Active Directory. SAP requires schema extension generated by RSLDAPSCHEMAEXT program to be applied to Active Directory so that report RSLDAPSYNC_USER can be identify SAP users in MS AD.
The MS AD team says that any non miscrosoft schema extensions are not supported as OIDs of the schema might conflict with other applications / patches.
Are the MS AD schema extensions generated by SAP program RSLDAPSCHEMAEXT supported / certified by Microsoft.
Harsh

Hi Harsh,
I would like to point you also to SAP Note 888848 - Notes on schema enhancement with RSLDAPSCHEMAEXT.
It especially states that:
..."The text document generated by RSLDAPSCHEMAEXT was supplied and validate as part of a certification process by the directory vendor."...
that means in this case by Microsoft.
If you decide not to use the schema extension that has been supplied by Microsoft you can use attributes that are already existing in your Active Directory as Juergen already pointed out.
As an example Microsoft Exchange Server creates several additional attributes such as extensionattribute1, ... , extensionattribute15 as part of the installation process. These attributes might be an option for you if you do not want to use the schema extension suggested by RSLDAPSCHEMAEXT.
Please have in mind that the filter attribute that you will use to determine the SAP username should be indexed since this will reduce the synchronization time.
Best Regards,
André

Writing extension for SQL Developer

Hello all,
I'm new to writing extensions for SQL Developer using JDeveloper. Can you help me with some example with common functionality, like how to get the current connection? Is there some documentation for the oracle.sqldeveloper package? The example may include some techniques like how to get the schema name for a chosen table, get some other info for the table and so on.
Thank you in advance!

Hello all,
I'm new to writing extensions for SQL Developer using JDeveloper. Can you help me with some example with common functionality, like how to get the current connection? Is there some documentation for the oracle.sqldeveloper package? The example may include some techniques like how to get the schema name for a chosen table, get some other info for the table and so on.
Thank you in advance!

Schema extension

I am trying to install Server Management and Monitoring Services on a test
network.
On the first screen, I have chosen extend schema.
Then when I go to install Management and Monitoring Services, it checks
the schema and returns this error. The selected tree does not have the
required schema extension. Error Code 1.
What am I missing? How do I correct it?
Thanks for your help!

> Have a look at TID 10084926, think this will still apply to the current
> install
>
> Ron
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:e_Jaf.904$[email protected]..
> >I am trying to install Server Management and Monitoring Services on a
test
> > network.
> >
> > On the first screen, I have chosen extend schema.
> >
> > Then when I go to install Management and Monitoring Services, it checks
> > the schema and returns this error. The selected tree does not have the
> > required schema extension. Error Code 1.
> >
> > What am I missing? How do I correct it?
> >
> > Thanks for your help!
>
>
Running the install with the NO_SCHEMA_CHECK allowed me to install server
management.
I am still curious why it does't recognize the extended schema. What
ramifications does that have down the road?

AD Schema Extension Updates?

Hi,
I was wondering whether anyone had any idea if Apple have any plans to update the AD schema extensions to support Apple Computer Groups rather than just Computer Lists? Lists are pretty old and the extra flexibility that comes with Computer Groups would be welcomed.
Thanks in advance.
Bobby

As I understand it, the main roadblock is that the Active Directory connector (essentially a directory service plug-in that translates AD-speak to Apple's internal format) doesn't computer groups, just computer lists. This could be added in future versions of the AD connector (I have no idea if there are any plans for this), but even then if you built computer groups in AD, they'd only work with Mac clients that had the newer version of the connector...
BTW, I've never seen much difference between computer groups vs. lists (probably because I don't use either one very much). What extra flexibility are you wishing for?

WSDL 1.1 Binding Extension for SOAP 1.2

Hi,
The WSDL file that is generated in XI 3.0 uses the specification SOAP 1.1
To apply the specification "WSDL 1.1 Binding Extension for SOAP 1.2", is it sufficient with adding the necessary parameters or have I to create the WSDL file again?
Parameters:
<wsdl:definitions
   targetNamespace="http://example.com"
   xmlns:tns="http://example.com"
   xmlns:wsoap12="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/"
   xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
   xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
If I have to create it again, which editor/utility can I use to create it?
Have I to activate some checkbox in the communication channel (Receiver Agreement/Sender Agreement) to this works?
kind regards,
Samantha.

Hi Samantha
I believe that this is applicable in XI 3,0 from SP 20.
king regards

Please prepare asap an extension for installing the new Jquery Mobile 1.2.0 release, which is now th

Please prepare asap an extension for installing the new Jquery Mobile 1.2.0 release, which is now the latest stable version, please. Many thanks, Adolf

Krrish,
So do you mean that the BPEL respository was already there when you did the install? If yes, then that explains the mismatch error. You should always clean up the old references if doing a reinstall. Drop the user and schemas related to PM and do a reinstall.
--Shiv

Kodo extensions for embedded fields

Hi,
I have the following situation: having input source, i generate persistent
classes and basic metadata for them. Then mapping tool creates a schema
and adds mapping information to this metadata as well.
Some of entities are marked embedded, but now i generate metadata for it
in a separate file. The problem is, that i want to specify externalization
extensions for these embedded entities, but Mapping tool does not transfer
this information into updated metadata files:
Assume there is an entity Trade, that has stateModel entity. stateModel is
embedded into trade. State model contains several enumeration attributes,
that have externalization extensions defined, to allow proper persisting/
loading from primitive attributes. Here is an excerpt from metadata for
state model after mapping tool has been run:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jdo>
<package name="com.bear.fi.tradehub.domain.trade">
<class name="TradeStateModelJDO">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-ind-name"
value="none"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-class-map"
value="none"/>
<field name="allocationStatus"
persistence-modifier="persistent">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="externalizer"
value="getByName"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="factory"
value="getByCode"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map"
value="none"/>
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-size" value="1"/>
</field>
</class>
</package>
</jdo>
However, the metadata for Trade itself (field stateModel) looks like:
<field name="state" embedded="true">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map"
value="embedded">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="allocationStatus">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="jdbc-field-map"
value="blob">
<extension vendor-name="kodo" key="column"
value="ALLOCATIONSTATUS"/>
</extension>
</extension>
i.e. field type is blob, not CHAR or INTEGER as the return type of
externalizer method is.
Is there any way to force Mapping tool to use initial metadata of embedded
fields as well, when generating metadata for owning object?
Thanks,
Egidijus

Unfortunately, no. Does it work if you manually change the mappings to
value mappings?Yes, it does. Actually i found out, that i left a mistake in generator,
therefore KODO was not able to determine return type of externalizer
method. Once i've fixed this, i get correct schema being generated without
transfering metadata to owning entity.
Egidijus

OAM - AD schema extensions cleanup

I'm uninstalling an OAM install that is using Active Directory on Windows 2003. Reading the OAM documentation it doesn't seem to be any cleanup scripts for AD. I have removed the oblix configuration but what is the easiest way to cleanup the OAM schema extensions from AD?

You're finding yourself up against on of AD's technical constraints here: once the schema goes in, it cannot be removed.
You could go through the ob schema and disable the various objectclasses and attributes (could probably write some ldif to do that) but, as far as I know, that's the best you can do.
Perhaps take the question to an AD forum and ask about sneaky ways to clean up schema?
Mark

SCCM 2012 AD schema extension

Hi all,
we were in the process of installing SCCM 2012 R2 in our lab, we have extended the schema & schema extension creates classes & attributes we just wanted to know where we can find these Classes & attributes in AD. where we can see it being created
in AD.
We have seen the successful schema extension in the log files but we also wanted to get the details from AD side.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Pranay.

This has all the details
But in summary:
Attributes and Classes Added by the Configuration Manager Schema Extensions
When you extend the Active Directory schema for ConfigMgr 2012, the following attributes and classes are added to Active Directory Domain Services:
Attributes:
cn=mS-SMS-Assignment-Site-Code
cn=mS-SMS-Capabilities
cn=MS-SMS-Default-MP
cn=mS-SMS-Device-Management-Point
cn=mS-SMS-Health-State
cn=MS-SMS-MP-Address
cn=MS-SMS-MP-Name
cn=MS-SMS-Ranged-IP-High
cn=MS-SMS-Ranged-IP-Low
cn=MS-SMS-Roaming-Boundaries
cn=MS-SMS-Site-Boundaries
cn=MS-SMS-Site-Code
cn=mS-SMS-Source-Forest
cn=mS-SMS-Version
Classes:
cn=MS-SMS-Management-Point
cn=MS-SMS-Roaming-Boundary-Range
cn=MS-SMS-Server-Locator-Point
cn=MS-SMS-Site
The Active Directory schema extensions might include attributes and classes that are carried forward from previous versions of the product but not used by ConfigMgr 2012. For example:
o Attribute: cn=MS-SMS-Site-Boundaries
o Class: cn=MS-SMS-Server-Locator-Point

EDirectory Schema extensions best practices / Mac OS X 10.5

Hello all,
I am integrating Mac OS X clients into my eDirectory environment, and part of my process is to extend the eDirectory schema with the relevant Mac-specific attributes. Is there an easy method to extending the schema, or do I need to manually add each individual attribute that is not already stored in an importable ldif file? Also, are there any best practices to follow when performing this work?
Thanks for the help!

Are these the extensions published by Apple? If so I think they have
fairly good documentation on their site where you got them from. If not,
well, we're going to need to know where you did get them from and what
they are actually doing.
And again, we need to move this to the novell.support.native-file-access
forum, where it belongs. Schema extensions are nothing to do with
netware.communications. Thanks
Andrew C Taubman
Novell Support Forums Volunteer SysOp
http://forums.novell.com/
(Sorry, support is not provided via e-mail)
Opinions expressed above are not
necessarily those of Novell Inc.

Schema extension with unique value

I would like to know if it's possible to perform a schema extension to add a new field to active directory and then require that the value entered into the new field be unique between all users.
For example say I want to track computer to user assignment by adding a field to record the computers serial number. I want to make sure that the same computer is not assigned to 2 people so when I enter the serial number I would like AD to make sure it's
a unique value between all other users.
If this is possible any links to documentation on how it would be done would be much appreciated.
Thanks for the help

Hello,
why not using the already existing attributes that are empty on the account proeprties?
Be aware that changing the schema can result in loss of the domain if done wrong. If you still like to change the schema built a lab BEFORE doing this on production and test everything in detail in the domain to be sure not problems occur.
Additional keep in mind that own schema changes may result in problems when updating the schema with new versions from Microsoft.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc961737.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727064.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.05.schema.aspx
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverDS/thread/f899e538-c197-497c-beb3-c9968c681867/
http://blogs.technet.com/b/isingh/archive/2007/02/18/adding-custom-attributes-in-active-directory.aspx
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
MVP, MCP, MCTS
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
My Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/mweber/
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

Warranty extension for Satellite U400

Hello!
I have a question about possibility to extend warranty for my laptop.
On the official web-ste there is information about my device and it;s written over there:
"Standard Warranty
Coverage: International Days:365 Expiration Date: 2010-05-25
Extended Warranty
Servicename: International Warranty Extension from 1 to 2 years Service Coverage: International Days: 730 Expiration Date: 2011-05-25 "
It's written that I have already an extended warranty, but i've just register the standard warranty of my new laptop!
Anyway, the question is: can i buy a warranty extansion in my cause and what type of extension i have to buy (from 2 to 4, from 2 to 3 e.t.c.)
Thank you in advance!
P.S. And one more question: my friend is going to buy Toshiba Satellite A500-1F2. The same question: which kind of warranty extension is he able to purchase?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Dmitry

Hi
Usually all notebooks are covered by standard warranty for a 1 year.
If you register the notebook on the Toshiba page, you will get an additional warranty year (altogether 2 years).
I think this is what you can see on the Toshiba page.
I think you can extend the warranty too.
You have to look here:
http://eu.computers.toshiba-europe.com -> Peripherals & Services -> Services -> Warranty extensions
There you will have to check available Warranty Extensions for your notebook model.
Greets

AD schema extension for ESSO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for