Add common keyword quickly across multiple images?

Is there a way to quickly add a common keyword across multiple selected images via simple text entry into the Metadata Panel or File Info dialogue - without loosing the existing multiple keywords?
I can use the keyword panel but this takes longer to add the keyword, and requires removing misc keywords that in most cases I don't want to keep and clutter up the panel.
For example, I have 3 images selected each with a single keyword "dog", "cat" and "horse" respectively.
I want to add a common keyword "animal", eg so that the first image now has two keywords  "dog" and "animal".
The problem with the two methods above is that:
Metadata panel will remove the existing multiple keywords, replacing them with only "animal" in each image
File Info will either do the same (if all existing keywords are highlighted), or if adding the new keyword, combine everything into each image so that each one has "dog", "cat", "horse", and "animal".
Maybe I'm missing something obvious but it doesn't seem intuitive for what I would expect to be a common requirement.
Thanks

How about to use Metadata Template to append the keyword that you want to add to multiple selected images?
First create a Metadata Template with the common keyword input. And then select the all the images you want to add the keyword and then append the prepared Metadata Template.

Similar Messages

  • Keyword search across multiple folders

    Is it possible to do keyword searches across multiple folders and drives in Bridge CS3? On disk I have organised my images by geographical location, but want to keyword them and search for them by theme. This will cut across several drives each with numerous folders and sub-folders. All the drives, folders and sub-folders are on the same pc, which is a stand alone machine and not networked.

    With Bridge it will search multiple folders on the same drive, but don't think you can search across multiple drives (I read you can with Lightroom).
    The search goes down the directory tree starting where you tell it. So therefore, start high enough to include all folders you want to look in.
    If you have Vista you could search across multiple drives if they are indexed. Advanced search allows multiple keywords (tags), and it is very fast, much faster than Bridge.

  • How do you add a water mark to multiple images within multiple files?

    I am having real trouble in trying to add a water mark to multiple images (mixture of jpegs and tiffs) within multiple file.
    I have used the Batch processing tool, but this hasn't worked or has been inconvenient, asking me to resave each individual file.
    If anyone can help or suggest another way of doing this, that would be great!
    Thanks
    Becca

    Are you using Russell Brown's script for placing watermarks?  Also you mentioned, "Within multiple file."  Did you mean multiple folders?  The batch processor has a check box for applying process to multiple folders.  What itsn't working - exactly?

  • I want to add disolve transition across multiple images?

    In FCP7 I just select all the images in the bin and drag them over the Canvas window and select insert with transition.  Is there a way to do this same thing in FCPX?  Thanks.

    Just select all the clips you want the transition applied to and then either double click the transition or drag it to the project and drop it on one of the selected clips.
    Tony

  • Color calibration across multiple images

    Hi everyone,
    I took a bunch for photos for a scientific documentation project outside in the shade throughout the day, resulting in significantly different lighting. Here are the first and last photos of the day:
    http://imageshack.com/a/img841/4403/94vy.jpg (late morning)
    http://imageshack.com/a/img208/7861/ibvz.jpg (late afternoon)
    The challenge is to use the color strip to calibrate the images so that the colors are consistent in all of them. Note that the color strip was printed without any special attention to calibration, so the absolute values of the colors are not necessarily trustworthy. Also, for these purposes, the paper can be assumed to be pure white. Basically, the idea is to get the absolute calibration as accurate as possible, but really nail the relative calibration, so that the color strip and paper appear essentially identical in all the images. I've tried adjusting levels by sampling known white, grey, and black in the images, but that hasn't done the trick -- clearly a more sophisticated approach is required! That said, I have over 100 of these images to process, so a relatively straightforward solution would be appreciated, if possible.
    Please let me know if you can help, and thanks in advance!     

    Move on to video editing apps. Seriously. Automatic shot matching features e.g. in Speedgrade or even Premiere's/ After Effects' Auto-Levels can already get you halfway there by doing a temporal comparison within the sequence, not to speak of sophisticated plug-ins like RevisionFX' RE:Match. They may in fact skew the colors oddly or make them appear dull and "too averaged", but that would be quite uniform across the sequence and then much easier to tackle with a global correction.
    Mylenium

  • Aperture 3 Upgrade:  Can't Keyword or Rate Multiple Images

    Select more than 1 image and apply a rating or a keyword. The rating/keyword only gets applied to only 1 of the images.
    This worked in Aperture 2.
    Is anyone else seeing this?

    You sure you haven't got 'Primary Only' in operation?
    Regards
    TD

  • Standardizing exposure across multiple images using a gray card

    Hi,
    I am studying chest feather coloration in Barn Swallows, and take pictures of swallow chests against a white background with gridlines, while always including a gray card in the image. In order to evaluate chest color between birds, the lighting, exposure and white balance for all images must be identical.
    I place my tripod in the shade whenever possible and set exposure manually (using the spot meter on a D200) to be 2 stops underexposed, and use fill flash to provide the bulk of the light. This gives me even lighting, but because of the automative flash exposure adjustment, each photo has slightly different luminance.
    I was under the impression that adjusting exposure would be a snap by clicking on the gray card in each image and telling my software to adjust it to 18% reflectance. However, Lightroom does not seem have such a feature. This seems very strange given how frequently one is instructed to standardize exposure with a gray card.
    Adding to the problem is that my gray card (from Delta) has a lot of microscopic variation in its surface in brightness (and hue). While Lightroom gives me a white balance adjustment eye dropper, it seems to be limited to sampling one pixel, rather than averaging values over a number of pixels. Because of the limitations of my gray card, Lightroom's white balance eye dropper is of little use, as the white balance vary dramatically depending on which pixel on the gray card I sample. Is there a way to change the size of the area sampled for white balance purposes?
    Thanks much,
    Gernot

    Gernot,
    I think the thing to do is to use a consistent setup, which means no TTL on the flash and a set distance from the subject, and minimise ambient light effects (small aperture).
    Alternatively you could photograph a "colourchecker" with each bird and use a calibration script on the raw files to sort out the settings each time - a bit lengthy though, expect about 20 minutes a time. However, it would be quite definitive.
    As far as the "single point" problem goes, you could set all the noise sliders to the max to blur out the imperfections in the card, take a sample, then undo the noise corrections.
    I can't help thinking that for reference work like this, Photoshop is the tool for the job and LR will help you get organised into PS, but it won't replace it.
    Damian

  • Remove adjustment from multiple images?

    I have multiple images where I used Sharpen instead of Edge Sharpen. I know I can Lift & Stamp the Edge Sharpen adjustment to multiple images but I can't seem to find a way to remove the Sharpen adjustment from all of them first. Is there a way to accomplish this? Thanks

    I can add the other keyword using your techniqe, but how do I get rid of the wrong keyword without interfering with the other keywords I have already set for the images?
    Keywords are metadata, not adjustments.
    If you want to add or remove keywords to multiple images, without interfering with the keywords that are already set, I'd suggest to configurekeyword sets and to use the keyword controls:
    For example, after designing a keyword set"Himmel" (sky) I can add or remove one of the keywords for all selected images  by simply pressing a button in the keywords panel or using a key combination: for example ⌥6  to add the keyword "Halo" to all images, ⇧⌥6 to remove it from all currently selected images.
    But the question is, how to remove one adjustment from multiple images, and that seems to be behaving buggy in Aperture 3.4.1, at least on my system: If I try to add an adjustment to (or remove from)  multiple images, only the primary selection will be modified - and yes "Primary only is disabled ).
    For example: Trying to add "Sepia Tone" to four images: I see the same on two MBPs and on my iMac with Aperture 3.4.1.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Can't add or remove a keyword from MULTIPLE images

    Hi:
    I've tried the trick of using SHIFT-RETURN (instead of RETURN) to REMOVE a keyword instead of adding it, after you type in the keyword in the Add Keyword box of the Keyword Controls window.
    However that only removes the keyword from the current active image:
    even if I have multiple images selected, only the current "active" image gets updated.
    (Using aperture 2.1.1 on mac os x 10.5.4.)
    Any pointers on what the problem might be?
    (UPDATE: same problem exists in reverse: trying to ADD keyword to multiple images using one of the keyword buttons, but only currently active image is updated, the other images in my selection are NOT updated with the new keyword.)
    Regards, Strathglass
    Message was edited by: strathglass

    Now that I discovered the problem also exists trying to ADD keywords, I was able to search for and find the answer in these fora:
    The solution:
    just had to select "Edit->Primary Only" so that the check mark went away from "Primary Only"!
    Regards,
    Strathglass

  • Removing keyword from multiple images at the same time

    None of the documented methods seem to work for me.
    1     Select all the images. Go to Metadata > Remove Keyword [my keyword] - the keyword is only removed from the image that is selected in the batch - i.e the one that has the yellow border round it to show it's the active image.
    2     Select all the images, enter [my keyword] in the Add Keyword field when Keyword Controls is visible and press Shift + Enter - does the same thing as 1 above (removes it from the active image only).
    3     Select all the images, Shift Click on the keyword that I have in my Keyword Controls in the Control Bar - does the same things as 1 above.
    So all these methods, which are supposed to work, do not work for me. The removal of the keyword is only applied to the image that has the yellow border showing it to be the currently active image in the selected batch - the remaining selected imaged still retain the keyword. I can remove it "one at a a time" but it would be great if I could find a solution as to why this isn't working.
    Any ideas?
    If it helps, I'm running Aperture 3.1.3 in OS X 10.6.8.
    thanks
    Alan

    Based on the frequency with which this trips up users, the Aperture team is going to have to add a much stronger visual indication that "Primary Only" is active.  Marching ants, anyone?  Or a pink selection marquee?
    At least in the Viewer when multiple Images are selected the thin white selection marquee is dropped when Primary Only is active.  There is no such change in the Browser.

  • Adding/Deleting keywords for multiple images

    Well, I'm finally paying the price for bad keyword management and I'm trying to clean up my nightmare of a system now but running into trouble.
    I'm using Lightroom 3.2.
    My workflow follows one of two types:
    1) I'm shooting something specific (soccer games) and I import the shots and immediately assign the appropriate keywords (soccer, which kid it is, which tournament it is)
    2) I've taken shots of multiple events/subjects and I haven't had time to download and organize.  I will then import with a 'file later' tag so I can easily search and keyword them later and then re-use the card.
    Well 'file later' is now about 3000 images!  Doh!
    I'm going through and properly assigning them but I'm having a lot of trouble with what I *think* should work in Lightroom.
    There are several things here:
    First, if I choose the 'File Later' keyword, it will pull up the metadata filters options on the top of the grid view.  No matter what I do, I can't make it go away.  If I do get it to go away, I wind up viewing ALL my pictures which is not what I want.
    Second, if I choose multiple pictures by ctrl-clicking or shift-clicking, It appears I can assign a keyword to multiple shots.  I cannot REMOVE a keyword from multiple shots. Lightroom seems to only want to remove the keyword from one picture at a time even if they are all selected.
    Third, the painter tool does not work...at all.  Enabling it and then selecting and applying or removing does nothing.
    So, what am I looking for here? 
    Organizing for these should be pretty easy since most are in blocks and I can apply the same keywords quickly.  However, removing the keywords one at a time is a huge pain. 
    What am I doing wrong?
    Thanks

    First, if I choose the 'File Later' keyword, it will pull up the metadata filters options on the top of the grid view.  No matter what I do, I can't make it go away.  If I do get it to go away, I wind up viewing ALL my pictures which is not what I want.
    This is the filter dialog - of course if you close it you turn back to All Photographs. Try creating a Smart Collection based on your File Later keyword - this collection will automatically populate all your images that have that particular keyword. Once you have keyworded the pictures from e.g. one particular shot, just remove the File Later-KW and those images will disappear from the collection.
    Second, if I choose multiple pictures by ctrl-clicking or shift-clicking, It appears I can assign a keyword to multiple shots.  I cannot REMOVE a keyword from multiple shots. Lightroom seems to only want to remove the keyword from one picture at a time even if they are all selected.
    I'm not sure why you can't remove keywords from multiple images - it just works fine here by selecting multiple images and delete the keyword.
    Most of the times I use the Keyword List to assign/delete keywords because in my opinion it is the easiest way - I just browse thru my list or filter for a particular kw and tick the box on the left.
    Creating a hierarchical keyword list can further simplify your work. For example the location: organize the final keyword xyz-Soccer Stadium into other keywords like Town>County>State>Country>Continent>Places, then you only have to tick the last keyword xyz-Soccer Stadium and with that assign all of those keywords in the hierarchy (I know thats kind of a complicated explanation...but I suggest you play around a bit and then you will get the full picture ).

  • Keywording multiple images

    Aperture is making me crazy. As soon as I ressolve on problem (usually with a workaround rather than a solution) another one pops up. Today it's about keywording multiple images.
    The manual says I can select a group of images and drag a keyword from the Keyword HUD to apply it to all of the images. But, it doesn't happen. I'm looking at 500 or so images that need multiple keywords applied to them all, but Aperture will only apply the keyword to one image no matter how many I have selected. Surely this cannot be right, but no matter what I do I seem to be able to apply a keyword to only one image at a time.
    I purely hat this application. Hate, hate, hate, hate. Been trying to develop a usable workflow for weeks and it's just not happening.

    Well, I have a bunch of cameras, and I also do photo restorations (typically pre 1900) for local families out here in the wilderness. The camera that is on my hip all day is just a little Canon A1100 IS, and the JPEGs it produces rarely need anything that Aperture can't handle. I have a couple of Nikons that I use locally, but the really problematic camera that I use a lot is a Fuji HS10. I'm too old to be lugging lenses and heavy bodies up and down mountains, and I frequently find myself on a ledge with a 100 to 1000 foot drop off and not enough room to put both feet side by side. The camera makes a decent picture, but noise is an issue as is lens correction.
    The workflow from this camera that I would prefer to use is that I would like to import RAW images directly from the camera into Aperture, naming the project on import. Can't do that because while Adobe supports RAW from this camera, Apple doesn't. So I copy the images from the card to the desktop and run them through DNG Converter.
    Then I import into Aperture as a project.
    At this point I would prefer to set the white balance in Aperture and open as a TIFF in Camera RAW for Lens Correction and Noise Reduction. Maybe some color correction and exposure stuff too, but that could as easily be done in Aperture.
    Then into Photoshop for more accurate color correction, sharpening and whatever else is necessary. Then I'd like to save it back into Aperture as a TIFF and have Aperture automagically select the last edited version in the stack as the pick and keep the stack closed so the last edited version is all I ever see.
    Unfortunately, this breaks down in several places. The biggest is that if I have PS open the TIFF in Camera Raw it breaks the connection to the file in Aperture, so when I save out of Photoshop it is treated as a Save As. Apple appears to insist on a .tiff extension while Adobe really wants a .tif extension. I can tell PS to not use any extension, but then I have to remember to add the .tiff manually, and that is a pain and I always forget. Not an option.
    So, what I do is import the DNG, set the white balance in Aperture and then run the Dfine (hope I spelled that right) plug-in which saves out as a TIFF. Then I open in Photoshop and do the lens correction (which does not work quite as well with the available lens profile as Camera Raw does) and do whatever else is needed in Photoshop.
    But, aside from not being able to use Camera RAW it's really the little things that make me crazy. Always having to remember to do a CMD\ to set the most recently edited version as the pick is something I need to do, but forget at least half the time. Also having to close the stack every time. I have too much to do, and I ought to have an option to do that automagically IMHO. Those little details help prevent screw ups and keep me focused on images instead of filing. I am a very poor file clerk. That's what software is for.

  • Add/Remove Keywords to multiple files?

    Hi Mac users!
    Is there a way to automatically add and/or remove keywords from mltiple files?
    First I would like to remove all the keywords from many of my files and then assign common keywords to selected files!
    One can do it manually, one by one, but that would take a huge amount of time!
    Is there any automatic way to do it? Perhaps with a specific application?
    Thanks for your help!

    Well I mis-spoke when I said they implemented what I asked for. They actually did something even better.
    There's a little text-entry area at the bottom of the keyword panel. You can type keywords in here and it finds them in the list (click the little magnifying glass icon to control how it searches--I have it set to "equals" so it will only do exact matches). When you hit enter, it automatically adds the matching keyword to the files. Or if there is no match, it creates a new keyword and adds it both to the keyword list and the selected files. Use ; to add multiple new keywords at once.
    Bart

  • Fastest way to add multiple images, one after the other, in DW5.5

    There has to be a faster way to add multiple images, one after the other, in a web page rather than just dragging each from the Files tab w/in DW 5.5
    I was a little surprized I couldn't select multiple images and just drag a block and have DW just insert an img tag with empty alts and the source path but maybe there is some options I just haven't found?
    I tried using Bridge to generate a quick html slideshow/gallery but it creates skads of divs and such... I just have to update an older site and was looking for an efficient way to add a bunch of images (random names ugh so just copying-pasting one and changing names is still more manual) that lie next to each other, no breaks inbetween....seems an ideal automated situation.
    I'd settle for an external script or app or something because they come in blocks of 25 approx and I have all my actions in PS set up to size appropriately which is nice so I just wondered if there was something good for this low-level production task.
    Thanks

    Thanks. Yes, I started writing a script but I just wondered if there were hidden gems in DW....so many programs do more than they are intended to do nowadays, I had to ask people who use it more!
    Actually, the fastest was to just dupe one line of code, paste x amount and then just use the pick-wip to point and drag. That at least cut the menu out of the equation.
    I thought I remembered doing a batch insert years ago..maybe in GoLive or before Adobe had DW? DW and GoLive are the only GUI html editors I've ever used..but, may it was just something out of an ealier photoshop...they've taken good stuff out and put good stuff in so many times that I can only remember so much!

  • Display of keywords for multiple images error in LR5

    In LR5, when two images are selected in Library view, the results in the Keyword Tags panel are incomplete. In my instance, two images were selected. They have some common keywords and those are properly displayed. However, the keywords assigned to only one image appeared with an asterisk in previous versions of LR, a behavior I would like to see continue.
    In my instance, one keyword for, we'll say, Image A only, appears but with no asterisk, it should display an asterisk. And, one keyword unique to Image B does not appear at all when both images have been selected, it too should appear with an asterisk.
    I'm on a Mac running 10.8.4 and LR CC.

    Are you in GRID view when you have the multiple photos selected?  The asterisk only shows up in Grid view.  I am also on 10.8.4 and it works for me.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Help - Can no longer sycn (not enough room error)

    I just moved a lot of audio books to my Audiobooks library (used make bookmarkable, then added them again and they showed up in the Audiobook library area of iTunes). I then plugged in my iPod. And now I'm getting the error dialog: The iPod "Blue iPo

  • Dreamweaver MX 2004 with Contribute CS3

    Good Afternoon, I have Adobe CS3 Web Premium edition, but a colleague located interstate is using DreamWeaver MX 2004. I would like him to design a dreamweaver template for use in Contribute CS3. Are there any known compatibility issues with doing th

  • HT4352 Closing computer makes home sharing on TV no longer available?

    Why is it that when I shut my computer my home sharing on the tv is no longer available? Do I have to have my computer up and running to share?

  • Document Context Menu for Ratings only shows NO OPINION as Anonymous user

    We are wanting the anonymous users to rate documents in KM.  Currently only the NO OPINION rating appears in the context menu > ratings option.  We would like all the standard ratings to appear (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor, Very Poor). Ple

  • Best size for previews

    What is the best size for standard previews when working with a 27 inch iMac? screen size 2560 by 1440 Also would you go high quality preview or just low. Stepping back a little - here's my work flow Import Convert to DNG fast load previews render em