Adding Filters to Images

Hey Guys
I'm making an audition tape for a friend of mine, the video filters seem to work on the video but when i added in pictures the filters didn't seem to work...
any suggestions?

i'm using Final Cut Express 4.0 its just i was messing around with it today and only noticed that the filters would apply to the images just nothing would happen.
please help me

Similar Messages

Is it possible to put a drop shadow on text added to an image?

Is it possible to put a drop shadow on text added to an image using Photoshop Elements 10?

Yes.
Open the Effects palette. In the drop-down. go to "Drop Shadows." You will find several listed. After you have applied, double click on the f on the text layer in the layers palette. This will bring up the Style Settings. Here you can fine-tune the shadow..
Note that in the drop-down referenced above, there are also Bevels which may enhance your presentation.

Adding an "IMAQ Image.ctl" to the "Display State.ctl" of an XControl prevents LabVIEW from creating a probe of "Display State.ctl"

I am working on an extended IMAQ Display control using LabVIEWs XControl capabilities.
I need a copy of the original image passed to add some overlays which must not affect the original image. To achieve this I am creating a backup image in the "Init.vi" and deleting it in the "Uninit.vi". I am storing the reference of this image in the "Display State.ctl" which is part of every XControl.
As soon as I am adding an "IMAQ Image.ctl" to the Display State cluster, it is no longer possible to generate a probe of the Display State cluster for debugging purposses. I am always getting the message: "Failed to load or create probe."
Deleting the "IMAQ Image.ctl" from the cluster makes the probe working again.
Is it a bug or am I doing something wrong?
I am working with LabVIEW 8.5 and Vision 8.5.
Regards
Ingo Bartsch

Hello Mr. Bartsch,
is it possible for you to post a small example to reproduce the behaviour? It would be helpful to get a description in which way you use the typedef files.
I found a example/knowledge base where some informations were included to XControl and LV but not with Vision.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/1DC1ADD2A136DA298625712C00635758?OpenDocument
Best wishes
Jan Kniewasser
Jan Kniewasser | Applications Engineer | Tel.: +49 89 7413130 | Fax: +49 89 7146035

Adding/Editing "Old" Images

A number of DNG images already existed on my HDD prior to installation of LR3. Now I would like to bring them into LR. Only practical way that I have found is, in Library view, to "Move" them from one folder to another folder. Just completed that maneuver for a number of them. I had added five other images, using the "Copy" mode. If I open the catalog called "All Photographs", the five show up as grayed out (already imported).So the following questions suggest themselves:
Is there a way to import existing images, which does not involve creation of a new folder?
What could have happened to the catalog created when those were imported?
Is there a way to re-import an image without duplication?
tks,
jwc

You wrote:
Is there a way to import existing images, which does not involve creation of a new folder?"
No, unless you give them different file names. As a general rule, not only for LR, you cannot have 2 files with the same name in one and the same folder.
If for instance you rename an image file in LR and give it the same name as an already existing one, LR will add the suffix "-1" to the second file.
"Is there a way to re-import an image without duplication?"
Why would you want to do that? If it was possible you would replace one image-file with another that has the same name.
If images are already in the catalog and for some reason you want them twice in LR, you have to do what you did: put them in adifferent folder.
WW

Mkinitcpio WARNING: No modules were added to the image.

I am trying to build a pf-kernel using this guide: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ke … raditional
Everything went fine, but when I try to make the initramfs, I get this error:
mkinitcpio -k 3.13.3-pf-dbb-pf+ -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-dbb-pf.img
==> Starting build: 3.13.3-pf-dbb-pf+
-> Running build hook: [base]
-> Running build hook: [udev]
-> Running build hook: [autodetect]
-> Running build hook: [modconf]
-> Running build hook: [block]
-> Running build hook: [filesystems]
-> Running build hook: [keyboard]
-> Running build hook: [fsck]
==> WARNING: No modules were added to the image. This is probably not what you want.
==> Creating lz4 initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux-dbb-pf.img
==> Image generation successful
I searched the warning message, but all the posts I found were related to other errors, like a "module not found" or so. As you can see, I'm not getting any actual error message, just the warning.
Is this message just because the MODULES line of mkinitcpio.conf is blank, or something else?

I definitely ran `make modules_install`. Twice actually, because I thought something went wrong the first time.
A find command shows that there are some modules, but only a handful. My guess is that I forgot to copy a good config before running menuconfig, so I'll try building again.
I was wondering why it only took 10 minutes to build.

Adding Filters To Still Images Makes Them Blurry

Has anybody experienced this?
I am working on a photo gallery and simply adding "ANY" filter such as drop shadow or roughen edges blurs the photo. If you toggel the effect on and off you can see the difference in quality.
It happens to either format "Tif or Jpeg" These are images with scale keyframes applied.
I actully noticed this in CS2 also. I guess it carried over to CS4.
P4 3.4 ghz
4 gig ram
geforce 6800 xt
Vista 64 bit (Clean Install)
Asus p5n32-sli deluxe (Bios and chipset updated)
All drivers updated
Premiere Pro Cs4 4.0.1

I've not experienced this in either 2.0 or CS3.

Adding filters or adjustments to an image of noise does not apply (some do work???)

Steps to reproduce
open new image
add noise
now try to add unsharpen mask or curves (there are other that dont apply as well but.....)
you can see the effects in preview
click OK and the changes do not apply

Mylenium is right, though actually they're applied correctly, they're just not SEEN correctly in the preview. If you look at the data closely you'll see that your effects indeed are applied to the document, but maybe not as aggressively as they appeared on the document preview in Photoshop.
This is because the preview display is optimized for speed and the effects are applied to the zoomed-out preview as closely as possible. Not all effects can be scaled perfectly using fractional numbers.
In short, Adobe figures you'd rather see a facsimile of the effect quickly than wait ages to see it rendered perfectly.
However, if you'd really, really like to see it rendered accurately, and don't mind waiting (and some possibility of destabilization), you can change the Cache Levels to 1 in your Performance preferences then restart Photoshop. With that setting, all effects are composited at 100% original size then the result is resampled for display on your screen. If you try this, you'll find it can get pretty sluggish.
-Noel

Aperture black and white filters making images blotchy

Hello All!
I'm having some odd issues with Aperture and using the black and white filters: mainly red and orange filters. I have tested this with different cameras (all raw) including Nikon D700, Olympus E-M5, Canon 5D mk3, Nikon D800; all exibit the same issue. I have also had a friend test this on Lightroom and the problem did not appear.
Picture a landscape with a blue sky. Upon adding a red filter, and sometimes orange, the dramatic dark sky one would expect with such filters becomes blotchy. It looks somewhat like bad JPEG compression or noise from high ISO images but these pictures are all generally ISO 100 or 200. Sadly, this prevents me from printing these images so I've had to find other ways of processing them. Even when exported as a 16-bit TIFF, the problem persists.
Anyone have any thoughts? Experienced this themselves? Thanks for any thoughts!

Thanks Kirby... I have checked the channels but perhaps there is something I'm missing. Here is a screenshot of a random image I have but it shows the issue well. These are at 100%, ISO 200, red, orange, no filter (respectively). The histogram is from the original. No other post processing done. The red is the worst offender... the orange isn't as bad but it can be worse on certain images.

Problem adding noise to image

Hi, did anyone know how to adding noise to the image using java. Actually I applying filtering function to my program, so I think, it's better to make automated function to add any kind of noise to the image.
Please let me know if anyone know how to do it.

Hi
I would like to add Gaussian Noise and Salt & Pepper Noise to the image. For example, I have one JPEG image. After I load the image, I can add any of this two noise to the image using button or something like that. With doing this, I don't need to search any other image with noise to run my program. Can you help me?

Layout changed when I added spacing around images.

@charset "utf-8";
body {
font: 100%/1.4 Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
background: #363;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
color: #000;
/* ~~ Element/tag selectors ~~ */
ul, ol, dl { /* Due to variations between browsers, it's best practices to zero padding and margin on lists. For consistency, you can either specify the amounts you want here, or on the list items (LI, DT, DD) they contain. Remember that what you do here will cascade to the .nav list unless you write a more specific selector. */
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p {
margin-top: 0; /* removing the top margin gets around an issue where margins can escape from their containing div. The remaining bottom margin will hold it away from any elements that follow. */
padding-right: 15px;
padding-left: 15px; /* adding the padding to the sides of the elements within the divs, instead of the divs themselves, gets rid of any box model math. A nested div with side padding can also be used as an alternate method. */
a img { /* this selector removes the default blue border displayed in some browsers around an image when it is surrounded by a link */
border: none;
/* ~~ Styling for your site's links must remain in this order - including the group of selectors that create the hover effect. ~~ */
a:link {
color:#414958;
text-decoration: underline; /* unless you style your links to look extremely unique, it's best to provide underlines for quick visual identification */
a:visited {
color: #F00;
text-decoration: underline;
a:hover, a:active, a:focus { /* this group of selectors will give a keyboard navigator the same hover experience as the person using a mouse. */
text-decoration: none;
/* ~~ this container surrounds all other divs giving them their percentage-based width ~~ */
.container {
width: 80%;
max-width: 1260px;/* a max-width may be desirable to keep this layout from getting too wide on a large monitor. This keeps line length more readable. IE6 does not respect this declaration. */
min-width: 780px;/* a min-width may be desirable to keep this layout from getting too narrow. This keeps line length more readable in the side columns. IE6 does not respect this declaration. */
background: #FFF;
margin: 0 auto; /* the auto value on the sides, coupled with the width, centers the layout. It is not needed if you set the .container's width to 100%. */
/* ~~ the header is not given a width. It will extend the full width of your layout. It contains an image placeholder that should be replaced with your own linked logo ~~ */
.header {
background: #363;
/* ~~ These are the columns for the layout. ~~
1) Padding is only placed on the top and/or bottom of the divs. The elements within these divs have padding on their sides. This saves you from any "box model math". Keep in mind, if you add any side padding or border to the div itself, it will be added to the width you define to create the *total* width. You may also choose to remove the padding on the element in the div and place a second div within it with no width and the padding necessary for your design.
2) No margin has been given to the columns since they are all floated. If you must add margin, avoid placing it on the side you're floating toward (for example: a right margin on a div set to float right). Many times, padding can be used instead. For divs where this rule must be broken, you should add a "display:inline" declaration to the div's rule to tame a bug where some versions of Internet Explorer double the margin.
3) Since classes can be used multiple times in a document (and an element can also have multiple classes applied), the columns have been assigned class names instead of IDs. For example, two sidebar divs could be stacked if necessary. These can very easily be changed to IDs if that's your preference, as long as you'll only be using them once per document.
4) If you prefer your nav on the right instead of the left, simply float these columns the opposite direction (all right instead of all left) and they'll render in reverse order. There's no need to move the divs around in the HTML source.
.sidebar1 {
float: left;
width: 20%;
background: #CF0;
padding-bottom: 10px;
.content {
padding: 15px 15px 15px 15px;
width: 80%;
float: left;
/* ~~ This grouped selector gives the lists in the .content area space ~~ */
.content ul, .content ol {
padding: 0 15px 15px 40px; /* this padding mirrors the right padding in the headings and paragraph rule above. Padding was placed on the bottom for space between other elements on the lists and on the left to create the indention. These may be adjusted as you wish. */
/* ~~ The navigation list styles (can be removed if you choose to use a premade flyout menu like Spry) ~~ */
ul.nav {
list-style: none; /* this removes the list marker */
border-top: 1px solid #666; /* this creates the top border for the links - all others are placed using a bottom border on the LI */
margin-bottom: 15px; /* this creates the space between the navigation on the content below */
ul.nav li {
border-bottom: 1px solid #666; /* this creates the button separation */
ul.nav a, ul.nav a:visited { /* grouping these selectors makes sure that your links retain their button look even after being visited */
padding: 5px 5px 5px 15px;
display: block; /* this gives the link block properties causing it to fill the whole LI containing it. This causes the entire area to react to a mouse click. */
text-decoration: none;
background: #390;
color: #000;
ul.nav a:hover, ul.nav a:active, ul.nav a:focus { /* this changes the background and text color for both mouse and keyboard navigators */
background: #6F7D94;
color: #FFF;
/* ~~ The footer ~~ */
.footer {
padding: 10px 0;
background: #CF6;
position: relative;/* this gives IE6 hasLayout to properly clear */
clear: both; /* this clear property forces the .container to understand where the columns end and contain them */
/* ~~ miscellaneous float/clear classes ~~ */
.fltrt { /* this class can be used to float an element right in your page. The floated element must precede the element it should be next to on the page. */
float: right;
margin-left: 8px;
.fltlft { /* this class can be used to float an element left in your page. The floated element must precede the element it should be next to on the page. */
float: left;
margin-right: 8px;
.clearfloat { /* this class can be placed on a <br /> or empty div as the final element following the last floated div (within the #container) if the #footer is removed or taken out of the #container */
clear:both;
height:0;
font-size: 1px;
line-height: 0px;
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Yellowstone Biologist</title>
<link href="NationalParks.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<script type="text/javascript">
</script>
</head>
<body onload="MM_preloadImages('habitat def.PNG')">
<div class="container">
<div class="header"><a href= /><img src="animals.gif" width="878" height="193" alt="bison" /></a>
    </div>
<div class="sidebar1">
    <ul class="nav">
      <li><a href="NationalParks.html"><strong>Home</strong></a></li>
      <li><a href="Park Ranger.html"><strong>Park Ranger</strong></a></li>
      <li><a href="Biologist.html"><strong>Biologist</strong></a></li>
      <li><a href="Geologist.html"><strong>Geologist</strong></a></li>
      <li><a href="Historian.html"><strong>Historian</strong></a></li>
      <li><a href="Games.html"><strong>Games</strong></a></li>
    </ul>
    <p><strong>Definitions (italicized words):</strong> </p>
    <p><em>Habitat</em>:   the natural conditions and environment in which a plant or animal lives</p>
    <p><br />
      <em>Extermination</em>: completely destroy or kill</p>
    <p><em>USFWS</em>: United States Fish and Wildlife Service</p>
</div>
<div class="content">
    <h1>Yellowstone Biologist    </h1>
    <h2>Mammals</h2>
   <p> Yellowstone is home to the largest concentration of mammals in the lower 48 states. Sixty-seven different mammals live here, including grizzly bears, black bears, gray wolves, wolverine, lynx, elk, bison, moose, and numerous small mammals.</p>
    <p>Visitors must view all wildlife safely. You must stay at least 100 yards away from bears and wolves and at least 25 yards away from all other animals—including bison, elk, bighorn sheep, deer, moose, and coyotes.</p>
    <h4>Bears</h4><img src="grizzly.gif" alt="grizzly bear family" width="150" height="115" hspace="15" vspace="15" align="left" />
    <p>Bears may be seen in Yellowstone March through November of each year. Yellowstone is one of the only areas south of Canada that still has large grizzly bears. Grizzly bears are usually seen in the open areas. </p>
    <p> </p>
    <h4>Wolves</h4><img src="wolves.gif" alt="wolves" width="150" height="115" hspace="15" vspace="15" align="left" />
    <p>
Loss of <em>habitat</em> and <em>extermination</em> programs led to the elimination of wolves throughout most of the United States by early in the 20th century. In 1973, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the northern Rocky Mountain wolf as an endangered species and designated Greater Yellowstone as one of three recovery areas. From 1995 to 1997, 41 wild wolves from Canada and northwest Montana were released in Yellowstone National Park. As expected, wolves from the growing population dispersed to establish territories outside the park. More than 1,600 wolves now reside in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. In August 2010, a U.S. district judge ruled against a <em>USFWS</em> 2009 decision to remove the wolf from the endangered species list, so wolves are protected as an endangered species in all three states again.<br />
    </p>
<h4>Bighorn Sheep<img src="BigHornSheep.gif" alt="bighorn sheep" width="150" height="115" hspace="15" vspace="15" align="left" /></h4>
    <p> Bighorn sheep once numbered in the millions in western United States and were an important food source for humans. They are named for the large, curved horns on the males, or rams. Females, or ewes, also have horns, but they are short with only a slight curve. In the winter of 1981-82, an outbreak of pinkeye occurred among bighorns in the Mt. Everts area. Many sheep were blinded and/or killed on the adjacent park road or by falling from cliffs. Some are now found comfortable around summer road traffic.</p>
    <h4>Bison<img src="bison.gif" alt="bison" width="150" height="115" hspace="15" vspace="15" align="left" /></h4><p>
    Bison are the largest mammals in Yellowstone National Park. They are strictly vegetarian, and they graze on grasslands in the meadows, the foothills, and even the high-elevation areas of Yellowstone. Despite their slow walk, bison are surprisingly fast for animals that weigh more than half a ton.</p>
<p>Yellowstone is the only place in the lower 48 states where a population of wild bison has survived since prehistoric times, although fewer than 50 native bison remained here in 1902. Fearing extinction, the park imported 21 bison from two privately-owned herds.</p>
    <h4>Bobcats<img src="yellowstone-bobcat.gif" alt="bobcat" width="150" height="115" hspace="15" vspace="15" align="left" /></h4><p>
    Bobcats are small wild cats with reddish-brown or yellowish-brown coats, streaked with black or dark brown. They have prominent, pointed ears with a tuft of black hair at the tip. </p>
<p>Unlike lynx, which they resemble, bobcats elsewhere have been highly adaptable to human-caused changes in environmental conditions; some biologists believe that there are more bobcats in the United States today than in colonial times. Yellowstone has many rock outcrops, canyons bordered by rock ledges, conifer forests, and semi-open areas that seem to offer conditions favorable for bobcats--adequate shelter, a variety of rodents, rabbits, hares, birds, and other small animals as well as seasonal carrion, for food.</p>
<p>Bobcats are known to hole-up and wait out severe winter storms elsewhere. These elusive cats are most active at night, so even those who study them seldom have an opportunity to see one.</p>
    <h4>Coyotes</h4>
    <p>
      Yellowstone's coyotes are among the largest coyotes in the United States. Adults are about 30 pounds, are less than two feet tall and vary in color from gray to tan with sometimes a reddish tint to its coat.</p>
    <p>Small mammals are an important component of coyotes' diets. In Yellowstone, such prey include microtines or voles, mice , pocket gophers, small birds, and in spring and summer, ground squirrels. They also feed on larger mammal's (elk, deer, bison, moose, pronghorn, and bighorn sheep) calves and fawns shortly after birth and young animals.</p>
    <h4>Elk<img src="elk.gif" alt="elk" width="150" height="115" hspace="15" vspace="15" align="left" /></h4><p>
      Elk are the most abundant large mammal found in Yellowstone and historical evidence confirms their continuous presence for at least 1,000 years. More than 30,000 elk from 7-8 different herds summer in Yellowstone and approximately 15,000 to 22,000 winter in the park. </p>
<p>Bulls grow antlers annually from the time they are nearly one year old. When mature, a bull's "rack" may have 6 to 8 points, or tines, on each side and weigh more than 30 pounds.</p>
    <h4>Lynx</h4>
<p>Adult lynx are about the size of a large domestic cat. Males can weigh up to 30 pounds, while females are smaller. The similarity between lynx and bobcats makes it difficult to determine their status in Yellowstone. A large adult bobcat may be larger than a small adult lynx, so size is not a good characteristic for positive identification.</p>
    <h4>Moose<img src="moose.gif" alt="moose" width="150" height="115" hspace="15" vspace="15" align="left" /></h4><p>
    Moose, the largest member of the deer family, were reportedly very rare in northwest Wyoming when Yellowstone National Park was established in 1872. Moose breed from early September to November and one to three calves are born in May or June. Calves weigh 25 to 35 pounds at birth but grow rapidly; adult females (cows) weigh up to 800 pounds and males (bulls) up to 1300 pounds. </p>
<h4>Mountain Lion</h4><p>
    The mountain lion, also called the cougar, is the largest member of the cat family living in Yellowstone. Mountain lions can weigh up to 200 pounds, although lions in Yellowstone are thought to range between 140 and 160 pounds for males and around 100 pounds for females.</p>
<p>Mountain lions are rather secretive, so most visitors are unaware of their existence in Yellowstone. Lions probably live throughout the park in summer. </p>
    <h4>      Amphibians</h4>
    <p>
    Cool, dry conditions limit Yellowstone's amphibians to four species: boreal toad; chorus frog; spotted frog; and the tiger salamander. Population numbers for these are not known.</p>
    </div>
<div class="footer">
    <p>Sources: <a href="http://www.nps.gov/yell/naturescience/mammals.htm">http://www.nps.gov/yell/naturescience/m ammals.htm</a></p>
    <p><a href="http://www.nps.gov/yell/naturescience/amphibians.htm">http://www.nps.gov/yell/naturescienc e/amphibians.htm</a></p>
    </div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
This has happened before, where everything in my content area has dropped down below the sidebar.It's happended on several pages. I don't know why or how to fix it. It's for a class, so where I've posted it is private, but here's the page and css code.
HTML

Murray is right. Padding (and margins) is added to the width. However, when using percentages, you should never use figures that add up to exactly 100%.
Browsers need to convert the percentages to pixels. Because pixels must be whole numbers, some percentages are rounded up, which results in the final element dropping down below its neighbours. With percentages, it's much safer to use values that add up to 98% (99% often works, but 98% is safer).

Question about adding tags to images and music

Hi I have an artist page online and I have read that adding meta tags to your page does absolutely nothing to help search engines these days and then someone recommended adding tags to the images on my site using aperture (which I cant afford) so can anyone explain if I can do this in iphoto or photoshop? and also can I add tags to the mp3's available on my site to better perform in search engine searches? can i do this with itunes?
Thanks in advance

The search engines have to be lead to your music/photo page using an appropriate URL and having a text description with as many relevant "key" words as possible.
Also, you need as many links to this page as possible from other sites as well as your own pages.
When I enter one of my own song titles and name into Google, all the top listed links are sites that sell digital downloads and CDs. Have a look at the way these sites list your music to see the most effective way of doing it on your own website.
Obviously, you first have to add your URL to Google, Yahoo etc and get them to verify your sitemap.

Adding links to Images

How do I add links to images? Unfortunately, I am unable to add a link to an image in my document. I selected the image but the "add link" option is grayed out. The inspector feature is very different in this new version and I am unable to figure out how to add links. Please help. This is very frustrating.
Thanks for your help in advance :-)

This isn't theory, it works.
Place a Text Box over the top of your image. To do this, you will need to select the Text Box, and from the right-panel Arrange tab, select Move with Text, and for Wrap, turn it off entirely.
With your text box still selected, use the Arrange tab to reduce the size of the Text Box until it fits inside your image with perhaps a 1/4 inch margin from the image edge. Type a @, #, or * character, then select a font-size large enough that multiple characters expand to just fill, but not overflow, the Text Box. You are creating a fog of characters that you can assign your link too. Still in the Text Box, select All, and then right-click, and choose Add Link. Once you have typed in your link, click outside of the link dialog to set it, otherwise, it will launch your browser to that link destination. Select your textual link again (command+A), and changing to the Style tab on the right-panel, reduce the opacity of this text content to zero. You now have an invisible link inside your Text Box.
Check your final Text Box positioning over your image, then select both, and from the Arrange tab, group and final position your Text Box/Image combo where you want it in your document. Save. Export to PDF, and the linked image still works.
The same principle applies to Text Boxes and Shapes where an image has been set to fill the background of the object. When you add text over the image within the shape, follow the process for adding hyperlink and reducing its opacity.

CSW: Filtered Google Images still appearing with HTTPS Inspect configured

Hi,
I'm currently testing https Inspect to close a hole in the Google Images search.
I was under the impression that https inspect would not display any images that are in the a blocked category.
I have a CSW created certificate installed on the PC I'm testing on which I see as being accepted. If I delete the cert from the PC, then I can't get to google (via https) as the cert is not accepted.
However, with the cert running on the PC, images are not being filtered within a Google search. It's not practical for us to change to a "safesearch on" policy and was under the impression that https inspect would indeed filter the images, but it's not. I've tested on some images that they are blocked as if I click the "visit site" or "view image" links, then I get the blocked page.
Any help is very appreciated.
Thanks
Craig

Thanks for the answer, but that's crazy, it didn't used to be like that before Google forced https on everyone.
I can't see how safe search can be enforced? I know it can be done on at DNS, but that doesn't help our field users who connect to their own/public wifi. Even when they are VPN'd, we use split tunnelling so that won't work either.
Seems a real limitation of CWS that you cannot simply manipulate URLs or make custom suffix's? Or can you?
Our contract is up later this year and with all the issues we've had lately combined with it not being a very powerful solution, I suspect we'll be looking elsewhere.

Graphics move when adding filters

I'm having strange things happen when using graphics.
When I add a filter eg GausBlur my graphic moves down when adjusting blur. I also get this when I apply other filters as well, but usually when I add a second filter/plug to the graphic.
I'm on a macpro dual quad, 16g ram and all apps are up to date
Cheers

The graphic shift has nothing to do with Blackmagic--that's a bug (or at least an issue) with Premiere itself.
It's pretty simple to replicate. Plop a Drop Shadow effect on a title (or other alpha graphic), followed by a Gaussian Blur (or Fast Blur) effect. You can first see the shift just by swapping the order of the effects; they can be left at detent, and simply changing the relative positions of the effects will cause the graphic to jump.
If Drop Shadow is above Gaussian Blur in the effects stack, even with GB set to 0, changing the Softness parameter of DS will shove the graphic down and to the right.
If Gaussian blur is above Drop Shadow in the effects stack, even with DS set to 0, changing the Blurriness parameter of GB will shove the graphic down and to the right. However, in this case, you can mitigate that negative effect by ticking the Repeat Edge Pixels option in GB. No matter what you move, the graphic will stay where it should. This doesn't work in the other scenario, however.
My understanding of this--though I'm not sure whether it's a bug or a functional limitation--is that when you're adjusting these softness parameters for either effect, you are altering the clip's dimensions via the alpha channel. That's why ticking the Repeat Edge Pixels option stops this; it clamps the alpha channel to the original image's dimensions. As you adjust these parameters, the alpha channel's dimensions bloom/grow larger, and this changes the clip's anchor point, causing the shift.
Obviously, this isn't right, no matter how you slice it, but I suspect that simply saying it's a bug is not really getting to the heart of the matter. I imagine there are some larger underlying issues with the way Premiere Pro handles alpha channels and effects that manipulate them that would have to reworked first. In other words, this is probably not something you'll see in a point update; it will likely require a new version of the software to see a true fix.

Adding logo or image to email signature

I have added my logo (a jpeg image) to my email signature. When I send an email to someone else who is using an Apple mail program it opens up fine. However, when I send an email to someone who is using, for example, a yahoo mail account, the logo does not show up on the actual email, it shows as an attachment that must be clicked on to open.
Does anyone know how to embed an actual logo/image onto an email signature so that it will be seen in an email regardless of what type of email program they are using without having to click on it? thanks

Jessie,
I would love to help you (and anyone else in your situation), but it seems I can't duplicate your problem. I read your post before going to work this morning, and I sent myself an email (from Mail at home to Lotus Notes at work) with a signature containing a JPEG. Notes, arguable the worst email client out there, showed the JPEG in-line.
I don't have Outlook or Outlook Express, so I cannot test those, but I'd be happy to receive an email from you so I can see what comes across. You need to send it to my work email because that's the only place I have an email client other than Mail running. The address is dkiechle followed by an @-sign followed by amadeus.com.
We can do the opposite as well: I can try to send a test email to one of the addresses that you used to see if my signature shows up with the graphics element in-line. Would be pretty instructive, I think. I can do this if you provide an address; however, I can only do it in a few hours from home as I don't have Mail here at the office.
One interesting thing to check: in Mail, there's an option to "Always send Windows-friendly attachments". Can you check if it is enabled or disabled in your configuration of Mail?
Daniel

Adding Filters to Images

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for