Adding higher level key words?

Greetings fellow LR4 users -
I already have several kewords set up in lightroom 4.2 (Win7). I want to add a 'higher level' keword to include some of those keywords already present. For example - If I already have
Dog
Cat
Bird
How can I add 'Animals' so that the result is -
Animals
     Dog
     Cat
     Bird
I know that I can add 'lower-level' kewords to existing keywords. Perhaps this is not possible? I can't find any options in dialog boxes that will allow this.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts/suggestions.
Ron

Create a keyword that says "Animal". Then drag "Dog" onto the "Animal" keyword, it becomes a sub-keyword to "Animal". Repeat for other desired sub-keywords.

Similar Messages

LEVEL key word in Oracle 9.2.0.1.0 & Oracle 9.2.0.7.0

Hi experts,
I'm using a Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production in my development environment and
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.7.0 - 64bit Production in production environment.
I use a query with a LEVEL key word and it works fine in the development environment and gives an error in the production environment. When I remove the LEVEL key word it works fine in the production also.
Was there a change which happen to LEVEL key word in these releases ???

PrasadDe wrote:
Was there a change which happen to LEVEL key word in these releases ???Probably. Who can tell. Those are both unsupported versions of the database.
Why not upgrade to something that's supported and we know works.

SUS - Added Data Type Enhancement and Higher level Proxies are not active

Hello,
I've added a field to our current data type enhancement Z_Purchase_Order_Item. Once I regenerate the proxy on the enhancement and activate it the field appears as it should in the high level items that use the enhancement (PurchaseOrderRequest_In). But those proxies have become inactive and when I try to activate them I get this message:
Interface II_BBPX1_SUS_PO was repaired before the Modification Assistant was enabled.
All Modification Assistant functions only apply to future modifications, not to those already
undertaken. This means:
-The modification overview only displays future modifications.
-When resetting to the standard, the system will reset all objects to their current version, since
the actual standard can no longer be identified by the Modification Assistant.
-Support for adjustment after an upgrade will only be available for future modifications.
Modifications that already exist must be re-made manually using version management.
The next message says:
Object can only be created in SAP package.
Then the status bar shows "Proxy Activated". But when I close and reopen the proxy I see that it is once again inactive.
Does any know what I need to do to activate this proxy?
Thanks,
Matt

In SPROXY you can open your proxy and then view the Activation Log under the GoTo menu. The log will explain better what the problems might be. In my case I needed to activate another data type enhancement first.
Thanks,
Matt

High level overview and key features - Urgent

Dear all Hi,
Please suggest me some points a i have to prepere one single slide PPT indicating the PP's high level overview and key features.
Please help
thanks in advance.

You coverthe overall general cyle involved in PP like
1 Receipt of sale order
2 MRP
3 Production Planning
4 Shop Floor Control(Planned order to prod order,Capacity planning,GI,Confirmation,GR,Settlement)
Key Features
1 Highlight the features of MRP
2 Capacity Evaluvation/Planning
3 Reports etc
Hope this is useful
Revert back if you have any further queries
Reward points if useful
Regards,
SVP

URGENT: Issue with hierarchy level keys and report drill down

Hi,
BASIC STRUCTURE:
I have created a subject area with 3 facts (FACT_A, FACT_B, FACT_C) and 4 dimesnions (TIME_DIM,DIM_2,DIM_3,DIM_4). Each fact table also has additional aggregate tables aggregated along levels of the time dimension. Also our timw dimension has aggregated dimension tables like TIME_DIM_WEEK, TIME_DIM_MONTH, TIME_DIM_QUARTER and TIME_DIm_YEAR.
GOAL:
All 3 facts have the same measures M_1 and M_2 in them but may not have data for the same dimension values selected.
For example
For month JAN 2000 FACT_A.M1=100$ and no data exists for JAN 2000 in FACT_B and FACT_C. Then in the report
for JAN2000 it should show FACT_A.M1= $100, FACT_B.M1 = 0 and FACT_C.M1 =0. In this case I should be able to drill down to the lowest level.
ISSUE:
The time dimension TIME_DIM has the following levels - Total -> Year -> Quarter -> Month -> Week -> Day
However I am having an issue with drill down in the reports whenever I pull metrics from more than 1 fact at a time. I have defined the level keys but not sure if I need to do anything in addition since I am using aggregates.
I have to fix this issue quickly. Please help me.

Alastair,
All the fact tables have aggregated facts as sources.
I have checked the levels set for each of the sources to the time dimesnion table in BMM and they look okay. So the Time dim table in BMM has 4 source tables
Time_Day (level set to day, table key is "day"),
Time_month (level set to month, table key is "Fiscal_Month_Code"),
Time_Quarter(level set to quarter, table key is "Fiscal_Quarter_Code") and
Time_Year(level set to year, table key is :Fiscal_Year_Code").
Note: No time week aggregate added as logical source.
Again the time dim hierarchy based off of this table has levels: Total -> Year ->quarter -> Month -> week -> day
The levels keys set for each level are
Year -> Primary key is Year_Name (YYYY)(Checked as chronological key) and another key is Year_Num (YYYY)(Checked as chronological key)
Quarter->Primary Key is Quarter_Name (YYYY Qn), another key is Quarter_Number (Format n where n can assum values 1,2,3,4). Both keys are set as chronological keys
Month -> Primary key is Month_Name (MON YYYY), another key is Month_Num (Format n where n can assume values from 1 to 12) Both keys are set as chronological keys
Week -> Primary Key is week name (YYYY Wk nn, where nn can have values from 1 to 53), another key is week num (nn, where nn can have values from 1 to 53)
Day -> primary key set to day (date format)
Issue1: When I try to drill to lower levels it throws out an error saying report cannot find any data because filters may be too restrictive even though I see data at higher level
For ex: If I drill down to Year: 2010 and Qtr: 2010 Q2 and M1:$100 when I click on Qtr to drll to month level it throws me the error
Issue2: when I add year and qtr colums to the report I see data as below which is incorrect
Year_Name Qtr_Name data:FACTA_M1 Data: FactB_M1
2009 2009 Q1 $10 $5
2009 2009 Q2 $20 $80
2009 2009 Q3 $20
2009 2009 Q4 $30
2010 2010 Q1 $100
2010 Q2 $101
2010 Q3 $102 $230
2010 Q4 $103
2011 Q1 $10
In the above example year_name is not showing up for 2010 Q2 and after. However if I change the primary key for level 'Quarter' by having key consist of year name and quarter name instead of just quarter name the issue doesnt occur and drill down works great. The only issue is when I drill from qtr it first shows year name and quarter name instead of showing the next level which would be month name.
Sorry about the long message but I thought you might notice something in how I have set up the keys.
Thanks

Why does OWB 9.2 generate UK's on higher levels of a dimension?

When you specify levels in a dimension, OWB 9.2 generates unique key constraints in the table properties for every level, but only the UK on the lowest level is visible in the configuration properties. Why then are these higher level UK's generated? Is this a half baked attempt to implement the possiblility to generate a snow flake model in OWB?
Jaap.

Piotr, Roald and others,
This is indeed a topic we spend a lot of our time on these past months. We are addressing this as (in my old days I had the same problem as a consultant) we know that this is a common problem.
So the solution is one that goes in 2 directions:
- Snowflake support
- Advanced dimension data loading
Snowflake is obvious, may not be desired for various reasons but we will start supporting this and loading data for it in mapping.
If you want a star table, you will know that a completely flattened table with day at the lowest level will not be able to get you a unique entry for month. So what people tend to do is one of the following:
- Proclaim the first of the month the Month entry point (this stays closest to the star table and simply relies on semantics on both ETL and query side).
- Create extra day level entries which simbolize the month, so you have a day level with extra entries
- Create views, extra tables etc to cover the extra data
- Create a data set within the tables that solves the key problem
We have opted for the last one. What you need to do for this is a set of records that uniquely identify any record in any level. Then you add a key which links to the dimension at the same point (a dimension key), so all facts always use this surrogate key to link (makes life in query tools easier).
For a time dimension you will have a set of day records with their months etc in them (the regular star). Then you add a set of records with NULL in the day having months and up. And you go up the hierarchy. For this we will have the ETL logic (in other words you as a designer do not worry about this!). On the query tool you must be a little cautious on counts but this is doable and minor.
As you can see none of the solutions are completely transparent, but we believe this is one that solves a lot of problems and gives you the best of all worlds. We will also support the same data structure in the OLAP dimensions for the database as well in the relational dimension. NOTE that there are some disclaimers with this as we are doing software here...
In principal however we will solve your problem.
Hope this explains some of our plans in this area.
Jean-Pierre

Changing foreground/ Background color in a High-Level GUI MIDlet

I have created MiDlet and all the Screens in the MIdlet are High-Level GUIs (Elements from Palette) and I didn't use any Canvas.
Now, I want to give color customization capability to my application.
I know its possible to change colors in a canvas.
But, my MIdlet doesn't use any canvas.
So, is there any possibility to achieve this ? (even if it takes to add canvas to my MIdlet, no problem, I just want it accomplished anyhow)
Please give me any slightest of ideas to achieve this.

I am not sure this will help you or not.... any way if u just want to add some animation or graphics to form its possiable thur javax.microedition.lcdui.CustomItem.
You can see it as a small canvas inside your form.
import javax.microedition.lcdui.*;
public class MyCustomItem extends CustomItem
    int W,H;
    public MyCustomItem(String label, int Width, int Height)
        super(label);
        W=Width;
        H=Height;
        protected int getMinContentWidth() {
        return W;
    protected int getMinContentHeight() {
        return H;
    protected int getPrefContentWidth(int i) {
        return getMinContentWidth();
    protected int getPrefContentHeight(int i) {
        return getMinContentHeight();
    protected void paint(Graphics g, int i, int i0) {
        g.setColor(100,0,0);
        g.fillRect(0,0,i,i0);
        g.setColor(0,255,0);
        g.drawString("Hello Thank God Its Working",10,10,Graphics.TOP|Graphics.LEFT);
}you can use MyCustomItem in your midlet
import javax.microedition.midlet.MIDlet;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.*;
import javax.microedition.midlet.MIDletStateChangeException;
public class CustomItemDemo1 extends MIDlet
    private Display disp;
    private Form frm;
    private MyCustomItem cust;
    protected void startApp() throws MIDletStateChangeException {
    disp=Display.getDisplay(this);
    frm=new Form("CustomItem Demo1");
    cust=new MyCustomItem("This is Cool...",100,100);
    cust.setLayout(CustomItem.LAYOUT_NEWLINE_BEFORE|CustomItem.LAYOUT_CENTER|CustomItem.LAYOUT_NEWLINE_AFTER);
    frm.append("hi this is Before Adding");
    frm.append(cust);
    frm.append("This is After Adding");
    disp.setCurrent(frm);
    protected void pauseApp() {
    protected void destroyApp(boolean b) throws MIDletStateChangeException {
}Just like canvas we can even add key press and other events inside CusomItem
you can even add traversal features by
    protected void traverseOut()
        // do some thing here
    protected boolean traverse(int dir, int viewportWidth, int viewportHeight, int[] visRect_inout) {
        //do some thing here....
return false; // or true;
    }Rest test and discover your self....
Hope it helps..
Edited by: Zac-Mathews on Jun 15, 2008 10:52 PM
Edited by: Zac-Mathews on Jun 15, 2008 10:56 PM

Use of New logical Level Key in OBIEE

Hi all,
can anybody tell me what is the use of newlogicallevel key in hierarchies(OBIEE).
why we need to set a newlogical level key for each level in hierarchies.
pls explain in detail....
regards
bharath

You may get info as below if you use Admin tool help file
Level keys. Each logical level (except the topmost level defined as a Grand Total level) needs to have one or more attributes that compose a level key. The level key defines the unique elements in each logical level. The dimension table logical key has to be associated with the lowest level of a dimension and has to be the level key for that level.
A logical level may have more than one level key. When that is the case, specify the key that is the primary key of that level. All dimension sources which have an aggregate content at a specified level need to contain the column that is the primary key of that level. Each logical level should have one level key that will be displayed when an Answers or Intelligence Dashboard user clicks to drill down. This may or may not be the primary key of the level. To set the level key to display, select the Use for drill down check box on the Level Key dialog box.
Be careful using level keys such as Month whose domain includes values January, February, and so on—values that are not unique to a particular month, repeating every year. To define Month as a level key, you also need to include an attribute from a higher level, for example, Year. To add Year, click the Add button in this dialog and select the logical column from the dialog that is presented.

Where can I find various high level examples of workflows being used

I am about to start a project with TCS 3.5 and have been participating in the Adobe webinars to help learn components and specific techniques but what I am lacking is an understanding of various workflows I can model my project after or take bits from various sources. Why start with Framemaker in this workflow versus RoboHelp or even Word? Questions like this I think come from experience with the process and I am thinking that what I am getting myself into is a chessgame with all these pieces and don't want to paint myself into a corner by traveling down one route. I have seen this graphic:
And this one:
And this one:
But they are too generic and do not contain enough information to really understand the descision making process one must go through on various projects.
Can we have a series of webinars made, all with the underlining theme of defining a working process or workflow, by having guests describe how they have or are using this suite in real life on their own projects? One that might include a graphic showing the routes taken through the suite with reasons why?
My project hopes to make a single source internal site that will tie together various 3D portable industrial coordinate metrology systems (hardware and software). It would be used as a dispersal site for help, communications between users and SME, OEM information, QA requirements, established processes, scripting snipet downloads, statistics, and training (including SOJT). Portable industrial metrology has 8 different softwares that are used and right now about 8 different instruments. These include laser trackers and radars, articulated arms, scanners, structered white and blue light to name a few. The softwares include Spatial Analyzer, Veriserf, CompIT, eMscon, AXYZ to a few there as well. I want to be able to participate and add content to an internal Sharpoint site, push content to users for stand-alone workstations, ePub, capture knowledge leaving the company through attrition, develop easy graphic rich job aid sheets, and aid in evaluations of emergent software and hardware. I would also like to leave the option open to use the finished product as a rosetta stone like translator between the software packages; doing this is the equivelent of doing this in these other software pacages for example.

PDF is definately a format I want to include, to collaborate with other divisions and SME for one reason, but also for the ease in including 3D interactive target models with in it and portability. I plan on being able to provide individual PDFs that are very specific in their topics and to also use them to disperse user guides, cheat sheets or job aids... something the user may want to laminate on their own and keep with them for reference, printed out. Discussion in these sheets would be drasticly reduced to only the elements, relying heavely on bullet points or steps, usfull graphs, charts and tables... and of course illustrative images. I am thinking that these should be downloadable buttons to print on each topic section, not in a general apendix or such. They would hopefully be limited to one page, double sided 8x10.
The cheet sheet would have a simplistic flow chart of how or where this specific topic fits in the bigger picture,
The basic steps,
Illustrations, equipment, setup
Software settings for various situations in a table or chart,
Typical result graph to judge with,
Applicable QA, FAA regulation settings or concerns,
Troubleshooting table,
Topic SME contact info
On the back, a screen shot infographic of software process
The trouble here is that I have read that FM has a problem sometimes in succesfully transfering highly structured or formatted material to RoboHelp. Does this then mean that I would take it from FM straight to PDF?
Our OEM material is very high level stuff... basicly for engineers and not shop floor users... but that is not to say they don't have some good material that could be useful. Our internal content is spread out across many different divisions and continents, with various ways of saying the same thing. This leads QA to interpret the information differently depending where the systems are put to work. We also have FAA requirements that need to be addressed and reminded to the user.
Our company is starting to also see an exodus of the most knowledagble of the users through retirement. Capturing the knowledge and soft skill packages they have developed working here for 20-30 years is something I am really struggling with. I have only come up with two ideas so far:
Internal User Web based Forum
Interviews (some SMEs do not want to make the effort in transfering knowledge by participating in anything if it requires an effort they don't see of benefit to themseleves), to get video, audio or transcription records

Table_comparison - how to compare data at a high level

Hi,
I have to do data validation at a high level between two tables that I am loading.
I am trying to use table_comparion transform but the problem is that my target table is at a much lower level than at which I want to compare data. So it has many more columns (both key and data fields) than what I want to compare.
Does the output of query transform ( which I am using as input into table_comparion) be in the exact same format as comparion table? If not, then can somebody suggest me something else.
Or how can I compare output of two query transforms ?
Thanks,
Saurabh Bansal

Dear Saurabh,
Not sure if you have already got the solution to this. If yes please close the thread.
If not, i would suggest you can use the validation rule to compare the two tables and then based on the PASS or FAIL result can check what needs to be done on the output.
Do post back if you have got the solution or you need any furthur help or else close the question.
regards,
Den

Phase out settings at a higher level such as brand or major customer

Have any of you ever setup phase out assignments at a higher level than product and had it work correctly? For example, we want to phase out a brand for a major customer. In other words, a customer is dropping a brand and we don't want statistical forecast generated for that brand customer combination any longer. I am able to setup the fields in phase out lifecycle settings for product, brand, major account but when i enter the brand and major account I am still getting forecast generated. It appears to stop for some products within the brand but not all. Another example is if a customer quits ordering from us I want to setup the major customer to phase out so no forecast is generated.
If you have done this successfully please let me know. Or if you would handle these situations in a different manner other than phase out please let me know. We can do historical adjustments each period but that is a lot of maintenance to do after each period before statistical forecast is generated.
Thanks
Steve

Hi Stephen,
Life cycle planning works only at the detail level (each CVC), the option of aggregate planning is helpful if you want to phase in or out a certain CVC when you are forecasting at the aggregate level.
One option is that you should have all products in the "profile assignment for life cycle " section which falls under that brand and customer. you can maintain a file and then automate the upload process in to the "assignment"
or
you can try to use the copy functionality in the realignment (/SAPAPO/RLGCOPY) , where you maintain copy factor as NIL and when the stat fcst is generated, you can use this as the next step to zero out -but you would need to maintain them manually.
or
easiest and safest wayy would be create a selection for those combination and do not include them in the planning job for stat fcst.
or
you can build a customised program to access the PA, PB, Data view and input the selection to zero out the stat fcst KF for that particular selection after the stat fcst run. here you would need to check if the diaggregated values are good enough.
hope it helps.

Errors in the high-level relational engine. A connection could not be made to the data source with the DataSourceID of '

When I deploy the cube which is sitting on my PC (local) the following 4 errors come up:
Error 1 The datasource , 'AdventureWorksDW', contains an ImpersonationMode that that is not supported for processing operations.  0 0
Error 2 Errors in the high-level relational engine. A connection could not be made to the data source with the DataSourceID of 'Adventure Works DW', Name of 'AdventureWorksDW'.  0 0
Error 3 Errors in the OLAP storage engine: An error occurred while the dimension, with the ID of 'Customer', Name of 'Customer' was being processed.  0 0
Error 4 Errors in the OLAP storage engine: An error occurred while the 'Customer Alternate Key' attribute of the 'Customer' dimension from the 'Analysis Services Tutorial' database was being processed.  0 0

Sorry hit the wrong button there. That is not entire solution and setting it to default would work when using a single box and not in a distributed application solution. If you are creating the analysis database manually or using the wizard then you can
set the impersonation to your heart content as long as the right permission has been set on the analysis server.
In my case I was using MS Project Server 2010 to create the database in the OLAP configuration section. The situation is that the underlying build script has been configured to use the default setting which is the SQL Service account and this account does
not have permission in Project Server I believe.
Changing the account to match the Project service account allowed for a successful build \ creation of the database. My verdict is that this is a bug in Project Server because it needs to include the option to choose impersonation when creating the Database
this way it will not use the default which led to my error in the first place. I do not think there is a one fix for all in relations to this problem it is an environment by environment issue and should be resolved as such. But the idea around fixing it is
if you are using the SQL Analysis server service account as the account creating the database and cubes then default or service account is fine. If you are using a custom account then set that custom account in the impersonation details after you have granted
it SQL analysis administrator role. You can remove that role after the DB is created and harden it by creating a role with administrative permissions.
Hope this helps.

If a material reports to two higher level assemblies in the BOM /Is there a

Hi,
If a material reports to two higher level assemblies in the BOM would creates two planned orders for it. Each of the orders has a different date?
For example
Z is final assembly
In that Y is one assembly in that says X1material in level 2
And the again same material X1 is reporting to Y in levels 5 so here my question is it would create two planned order with different dates?
And
Is there any report to see confirmed time to say machine time / labor time or shall we go for report.
Thx....Srini

Srini,
CS15 can be usefull to check the usage of component in assemblies.
if its used then more then once it can be easily located through this report.
another concern what you expressed is not clear.
But what i understand is same component is used at level 2 and level 4 of a BOM.
assumption from the word levels is , X is used in level 2 its used directly in BOM of Y and Y have some differnt component G which inturn again have X in it .
so at both this levels if the dependent requirement is different, you can get 2 differnet orders use individual /collective indicvator for this material as individual .
If your concern is for BOM position (Item Number) field in BOM then system will create a single plan order even if you set it for individual requirement in material master.here some work around can be possible by maintaining lead time offset IN BOM in item detail screen.
check and come back
Hope it helps you
Regards
Ritesh

Is there a way to identify the key words being used for SEO when I'm visiting a web site?

When I am on a web site, looking at a product for sale, is there an app or add on I can use to see what that site has for key words, meta tags etc? It would be helpful when adding products to my own site to see what works elsewhere.

Do search engines even look at those anymore? URL, title and page content are what's relevant.
* http://www.metatags.org/google_ignores_meta_tags_in_ranking
In any case, you can look at the source code. Click the Firefox button, then Web Developer, then View Source. You can also press Ctrl+U.
All 'SEO' add-ons:
* https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/search/?q=seo&sort=users

How to automat. copy configuration of higher level material to sub-item

Hi Experts,
I have Make to Order Scenario.
My customer wants the configuration of the non-phantom sub-items in the sales order to be automatically copied from the configuration of the higher level material.
I have added the ZCOPY function module( to copy configuration) to the configuration profile of the sub-item but the program flow does not go through the function module because sub-item has a link to higher level material.
If I go to the configuration of the sub-item in VA02, it appears a message u201CThe item configuration can only be changed by that higher level materialu201D. All chosen characteristics of the higher level material are shown, actually configuration of the higher level material is shown because of the link. But in CU44 of that sub-item, sales order no
Characteristics are selected.
Any suggestion how and where to place automatic copy of the configuration of the higher level material to the sub-item?
Kind regards,
Danijela Zivanovic

Vivek & Madhava
    Thank you for your comments. I know that adding A's routing to B is the best simple way to solve the problem. But as a little part of our global firm, our plant can't change master data related to cost calculation so easy. Every chance should be verified by global cost control team. And the routing is B is already very complex, we don't want to make it more complex.
    As same, create another material code is not available too because this should be considered by global team.
    Currently, we are creating production order for A separately. And A was looked as a component in B's production order. So, there are 2 production orders should be deal with. In fact, these two orders should be done at same time. It was complained by shop floor that too much order confirmation work to do. Warehouse complains too. And further, this way disturbs production planning very much due to the system will not always plans these 2 orders together.
Regards
Robbie

Adding higher level key words?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for