Adding Trading Partner to Coding Block subscreen

Hello All,
The company that I work for have a need to add Trading Partner field to Coding Block subscreen to allow manual and in batch population of this field.  I have added Trading Partner to all custom coding block subscreens via transaction OXK1 but the field is still not available in FB01 when 'More' button is clicked in the document item.  It needs to be there because the standard SAP interface program RFBIBL00 expects it there for Account Type S.
Could you please let me know how I can make this field available in the Coding Block subscreen?
Thank you so much!

Hi,
Please check in field status group, see if you set the field "visible"
Regards,
Pole

Similar Messages

  • DOCUMENT SPILTTING ON BASIS OF TRADING PARTNER(VBUND) FIELD

    Dear Friends
    We are on ECC 5.0, we have activated document splitting on BUSINESS AREA basis..
    As for new requirement for consolidated financial reports, we have also added TRADING PARTNER(vbund) field for document splitting ..
    We have define companies(trading partner), assign them to relevant customer and vendor master.
    Also have tick INTER COMPANY POSTING AND TRADING PARTNER field in document types(OBA7)
    in documents, with vendor and customer relevant line items trading partner is coming automatically..
    for G/L related line items we want that trading partner should come automatically through document splitting ..
    please note that we cant assign trading partner with G/Ls in chart of accounts as same G/Ls can be used with different different trading partner at the same time..
    Kindly help me in this issue..
    Regards
    Expertia..

    Document Splitting is too complex a concept for Substitution.  If you have to just copy the Business partner to the missing lines, then you can use substitution.  But if you have more than one BP in any entry and the transaction has to generate entries accordingly to balance it, substitution cannot do that.
    If you are trying to split on any field other than Business Area, Profit Center and Segment, it involves a lot of work in terms of configuration and development.  You have to develop your custom routine to enable splitting on your selected field (VBUND) in your case.
    If I remember right, there is a consulting note which explains a brief summary of what is to be done for having Document splitting on custom fields.  You can try searching Service Market place.
    Ravi.

  • About copa and coding block fields

    Hi guys,
    For our business requirement,we want to transfer some copa fields value to coding block fields,Is there any way to do that?
    Thanks.
    Pole

    hi savitha ,
    i have added a zzfield in coding block , now i  want that field values need to be populated from bseg table also .
    Thanks,
    sridhar

  • TPID (Trading partner ) blocked for posting

    Hi Gurus,
    User removing the payment block in FB02 got error message Company code or TPID blocked for posting...
    Please any body give me advise were exactly error ...
    where exactly we created in Trading Partners?
    Advance thanks
    Sudharshan

    Dear Sir,
    When we are maintating the Group chart of account we need tomaintain the Trading partner as a mandatory,
    Before creation of any vendor / customer  or gl account we need to create at trading partner and then we create in company code at the time of creating the master we need to give the vendor code at Tranding partner place.
    In your case Please remove the block at trading partner vendor master record and then remove the block at company code leve.
    Thanks
    Harikishan
    Assign points if useful.

  • Maintain Subscreen for Coding Block

    Dear Guys
    I have a requirement to create a subscreen for a FI transaction. I know that this can be done using OXK1. I have already created a subscreen. But I want to know that how can I link that subscreen with a particular Transaction.
    e.g I have made a subscreen in Maintain Subscreen for Coding Block. Now how can I guess which transaction will call this sucscreen.
    As a ABAPER I think there would some user exit or enhancement through which we call these subscreens for a particular Transaction.
    Pls give a detailed answer, I have created a subscreen but dont know how to link it with a particular T-Code in FI
    . Thnx

    Will any body tell me from where I can find out a complete documentation on FI Coding Block. Documentation is sap.help.com is not helping me.
    Will any body explain what is the coding block and how it can be used.
    Thnx

  • Block the Trading Partner for Postings..

    Hi Guru's,
    Any change to Block the the trading partner for postings?
    regards
    JK

    JK,
    Can you elaborate on what you mean by "each trading partner created consolidation unit"?  Are you working with Consolidations within R/3?  SEM? 
    Regards,
    Shannon

  • Block Trading Partner

    Hello,
    Is it possible to block a specific Trading Partner withouth deleting the entry on the Customizing?
    I don´t want to delete the entry because it could bear inconsistences on the system because there are already posting with that Trading Partner.
    Obviously, the first one step is block, delete, modify, customers/vendors with that Trading Partner to avoid new postings.
    Of course, I can create a validation, but I would like to know if there is another solution.
    Thanks in advance.
    Víctor.

    If you are using GTS, consider blocking it from that end.  Other than that, I do not know of any other means by which you can block a trading partner.  You may possibly have to ask an abaper to do that for you or just remove the trading partner specified in the vendor/customer master record.
    Another alternative is to suppress the field in field status group for vendor and customer account groups.
    Vendor: OBD3
    Select:  Vendor Account Group your company uses.
    Double click on General Data under field status
    Next, double click on Control and then suppress the trading partner field.
    Customer: OBD2
    Select:      Customer group your company uses. e.g Sold to Party
    Double click on General Data under field status
    Next, click on Control and then suppress the trading partner field.
    Elias
    Edited by: Elias Akorli on Oct 5, 2009 5:38 PM

  • Trading Partner Block for Postings

    HI Guru's,
    With Enerhgy having a new company code "G1SG", is it possible to block "ENRGHY" in SAP to prevent users from selecting this trading partner.
    Purpose is to just use 1 trading partner for Enerhgy. Now, Enerhgy has 2 trading partners in SAP for users to select from.
    Kindly advise, thanks.
    regards
    JK

    Hi,
    The simplest to do would be to enter "Do not Use" in front of the trading partner text.
    There may also be authorisation objects for it, will check and revert.
    cheers.

  • Error validating TP...AIP-11052: Writing following objects: Trading Partner

    Hi,
    I am getting following error validating trading partner. I have double checked the TP setup, everything looks fine. I had earlier successfully validated, later added a document type and trying to re-validate.
    AIP-11052: Writing following objects: Trading Partner failed due to following constraint violation: PARTY. CAN NOT UPDATE UNVERSIONABLE OBJECT IN A VALIDATED CONFIGURATION
    Does anyone have any clues??
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Make sure you do not have active configuration which is using this agreement.

  • Special Ledger Summary Table trading partner filed update

    Hi,
    We are in SAP 4.7 version. We do have SPL past 15 years. Recently I got request to add few fields to the existing SPL table group, ex: Functional areas and Trading Partner fields.
    I added these fields and I am testing now. Trading partner filed is updating in all tables for GL account document. For inter company vendor and customer invoices document trading partner field is updating only in Actual table for both lines, but not in totals table. It is updating only GL account line in Inter company Vendor invoice, but not in Inter company vendor line item trading Partner, which is populated from inter company vendor master. it is updating in GL document, CO document and SPL actual tables. I am trying to resolve this issue; Please let me know your idea.
    Thanks,
    Anil.B

    We are going forward with getting the natural account detail data using the profit center extractor 0EC_PCA_3, and getting the ferc summary data using the general ledger extractor 0FI_GL_1.  With our testing so far, this combination will provide us the data we need in BCS.

  • How to update trading partner (BSEG-VBUND) in tr.code FB01/FB02?

    Hi,
    I need, under some circumstances, to update value of trading partner code (field BSEG-VBUND) to all items in the FI document, created/changed with transaction FB01/FB02.
    I checked available user exits and bussiness events, but didn't found one, which could do the trick.
    In fact, in bussiness transaction event #00001430 (CHANGE DOCUMENT: Field substitution header/line - Checks prior to posting change completed) - for FB02 I have access to the internal table T_BSEG, but it seems this table is used as import parameter only and any changes didn't take efect at the end.
    Any help how can I do the trick? And this is while I'm in a transaction FB01/FB02.
    My system is 4.6c.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ivaylo Mutafchiev

    Svetlin, Max,
    what I did until now is:
    1) followed matrix substitution = callup point 3 (complete document) - I checked for existance of correct substitution field(s) in the GB01 table, and re-generated substitution code (as noticed in note 42615). That added my field in the list of fields for substtitution which are considered at the end of substtitution - in forms:
    FORM EXP_REC_015                      
            USING                        
              DATA_CHANGED TYPE GB002_015
            CHANGING                     
              DATA_OUT TYPE GB002_015.
    and
    FORM EXP_TAB_015_BSEG                   
             USING                          
               IN_ORIG STRUCTURE        BSEG
            CHANGING                        
               OUT_RESULT STRUCTURE     BSEG
               B_RESULT.
    both forms are in main generated program GBTAAFI0.
    My field (VBUND) is taken in account - added to the structure:
    DATA:  BEGIN OF TEMP_STRUCT,                          
            VBUND                          LIKE   BSEG-VBUND
            ZFBDT                          LIKE   BSEG-ZFBDT
            END OF TEMP_STRUCT.                            
    here ZFBDT was the other field defined in GB01 for substitution from someone esle - perhaps by default, I don't know.
    Further (in the include MF05LFB0),
    almost all of the structures which contain my changes are cleared (below is extract from the code):
    LOOP AT beltab WHERE xarch NE char_x.                   "Note 0383125
    REFRESH xbseg.                                                     
      REFRESH ybseg.                                                     
      REFRESH xbsec.                                                     
      REFRESH ybsec.                                                     
      REFRESH xbsed.                                                     
      REFRESH ybsed.                                                     
      REFRESH xbset.                                                     
      REFRESH ybset.                                                     
      REFRESH t_bsegco.                                                  
      REFRESH t_fmfich.                                                  
    Further, the logic proceed with the program SAPFF011 and form 'import_*beleg', where my changes were overwritten with original data - before substitution.
    2) Tried Max's proposal - and extended structure BSEG_SUBST with field VBUND, further populated the substitution table in the related BTE 1430 accordingly.
    Unfortunately the flow-logic proceeded further to the same form 'import_*beleg' in the program SAPFF011 and my changes dissapeared.
    I'm at dead-end - have no idea where and what is the problem...
    Checked few OSS notes - 42615, 386896, 513891, 391309, 438076. Everything which is related to my exact situation is set correctly - as far as I found :-).
    Just for tests I tried both ways (BTE and matrix substitution) with another field ==> BSEG-XREF3, and it was updated correctly - accorging to my logic.
    Thanks guys, your suggestions were right at the time and valuable, but they didn't help me to solve my problem. Perhaps there is something messed in our system - I can't be sure. What I can say for sure is that we have working BTE-s (1430 is used in our system - I just added piece of code into it), and validations are working also.
    Thanks again.
    Regards,
    Ivaylo
    P.S. If you have any suggestions, I'll be glad to hear them from you.

  • Using a Trading Partner Directory Implementation for Companies

    Hello experts,
    I am looking into configuring delegate useradmin using companies.
    The UME approach requires a engine reboot and somhow doesnt fit our requirements.
    The second approach - "Trading partner directory implementation" seems feasible.
    To implement this do I need to have any additional Bussiness package or additional installation for my portal? The document does state that this approach is only available with SAP supplier relationship management. What does this mean??
    thanks,
    Vineeth

    Hello Peng Ronan,
    Did you have any success with your Trading Partner Directory?
    Our project includes ECC, CRM 5.1, SRM6.0 and Portal7.0. We have this CRM scenario where a customer (manager) logs on and approves one of his employees, already self-registered, as a customer Portal user. UME seems to support that scenario, but it can only retrieve company information from a SRM backend system using a custom implementation of the Trading Partner Directory interface. In our case it is a CRM scenario and CRM Business Partners are not replicated on SRM.
    What is that SRM Trading Partner Directory interface and how much effort is involved in this custom implementation?
    Does the portal need to restart for new Companies to be added?
    Is this only for EBP scenario?
    Is there a better way to update the list of companies in UME from a list of CRM Business Partner?
    Thanks

  • Note 779844 Inheritance of trading partner to line items

    hello
    I need to apply OSS note 779844. This Note has three steps:
    1. A series of source code changes in the system (done through Tx. SNOTE).
    2. Modify database table GB01 by adding to boolean class 15, table BSEG, the field VBUND (company)
    3.Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is implemented.
    I have trouble understanding what should be the logic for the point 3, the substitution.
    the note say that "the inheritence of the trading partner (VBUND) to allother line items of the other company code also occurs if not all line items of the two company codes (except for the company code clearinglines) contain profit and loss accounts, therefore also if line items with balance accounts are involved in the posting"
    The note also says to use the substitution with a user exit. I don't know what user exit I should use.
    does anyone applied this note before? can anybody explain to me what logic should I use for the FI substitution?
    thanks

    Hi Jorge,
    I'm in the middle of implementing this SAP note. Just like you, i encountered the same problem.
    I don't understand what does the note means for solution no 3.
       "Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with
       a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is
        implemented."
    If you have found the solution, please share with me.
    TQ.

  • AS2 and Trading Partner Identification for MDN

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where I have multiple Trading Partners that all use the same hub provider. I have setup the trading partners individually in B2B so the trading partner can be identified regardless of the transport server endpoint.
    For inbound documents I use the 'Identifying XPATH Expression" and "Identification Value" to override the default Document Definition so I can see which Trading Partner the Invoice is from, regardless of the hub provider that sent it. This is working fine.
    However, when sending outbound documents such as a Purchase Order the ourbound document is shown correctly :-
    HealthCorporateNetworkWA BBraunAustraliaPtyLtd AS2 - 1.1 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Doc - 2.5 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Action Complete 30 March 2009 10:07:54
    Whereas when the MDN is returned it is identified as another trading partner :-
    BaxterHealthcarePtyLtd HealthCorporateNetworkWA AS2 - 1.1 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Doc - 2.5 Acknowledgement Complete 30 March 2009 10:07:59
    These are 2 seperate agreements that are deployed and I assume that the b2b instance is simply identifying the appropriate Trading Partner Agreement by the AS2 Identifier only ?
    Is there anyway to modify this behaviour ? Obviously I want it to indicate that the MDN is coming from the Trading Partner I sent the PO to ? If I got the hub provider to apply a AS2 Custom Header would I be able to use this instead by adding a new Trading Partner Identification Type and then using that as the identifier in the TP Agreement ?
    Given the MDN is a synchronous response, why isnt it associated with the same TP Agreement ?
    Any ideas ?

    You are using custom over AS2 business protocol where in the identification of trading partner can only be based
    on the Exchange which is by AS2 identifier. The identification of Agreement is happening in the document layer which is nothing to do with whether the Acknowledgement is Sync/Async.
    Ideally you should create the agreement between host and hub provider

  • Document splitting for trading partner

    Hi friends,
    We have a requirement that the trading partner can also be split when posting FI document like profit center can be split. I cannot find characteristic of trading partner in config menu: Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger. Only fields of Business Area, Profit Center, and Segment can be added for document splitting. Is it possible to add trading partner as document splitting charcteristic?
    Thanka in advance,
    Jessie

    Hi JPA,
    Thanks for your information. I read the note 1085921 and found the below point which seems like more than the three fields can be split. We still can add custom fied to be split, right? but how?
    2.1 New g/l scenarios
    In order to split the posted items of a particular ledger by the selected criteria (SEGMENT, PROFIT CENTER, custom field [ZZxxx], etc.), the relevant new g/l scenario has to be assigned to this ledger.
    Jessie

Maybe you are looking for