Additional tax calculated in PO
Dear Friends,
According to user sales tax rate for PO# 4111131887 should be 9%, however, for last invoice posted agains it, calculated sales tax rate was 13%. User is asking to explain where is the additional tax coming from.
Please suggest.
Regards
Sridhar
Hi,
Pleasae check the tax code in the PO and Invoice
Also check the FTXP for the tax code used.
Please give complete details.
Cheers,
Satish Purandare
Similar Messages
-
Income Tax Calculations - Issue
Client is saying that as per their existing SAP system, the Income tax calculation is made on Gross salary. And they are saying that if any additional taxable payout is made in a month to an employee, then the total tax on this additional payout should be paid by the employee in the same month. So basically his total tax would be the (general regular monthly tax + total tax on the additional payment), which as per them the system is not calculating correctly since October 2010.
Hi,
Thanks for your reply Jurgen & Remi. I am pretty new to Payroll & this is India Payroll.
Now, the issue is how should I proceed ahead.
1. The client says that the wage types are already configured in the system in such way that on certain wage types, the tax which is calculated is paid in the same month. Can u pls inform that which processing class & cumulation class do I need to check in Table 512w_d for this wage type.
2. As I need to see this whole functioning in Schema, pls guide as to where I should check this whole tax calculation in Schema.
3. The function I have heard which is used is India for Income tax is INTAX.
Looking forward to your reply.
Thanks a lot!!!
Edited by: SAP ST on Nov 25, 2010 7:24 PM -
How to create dynamic Invoice report based on Tax calculations
Hi Ppl,
I have an invoice report requirement. There are multiple line items in invoice and each line item will have a tax % and discount associated with it. Discount has to be applied at line item level. Tax will be applicable on resultant amount which respect to tax share on total amount. Below is example
Part# Tax Qty UnitPrice Amount Discount Net Value
1 12.5% 40 10 400 100 300
2 12.5% 50 20 1000 200 800
3 4% 10 30 300 50 250
SubTotal 1350
VAT 12.5% on 1100(300+800) 137.50
VAT 4% on 250 10
Total Amount 1497.5
I have created a static rtf which does all calculations correctly. I have hardcoded 12.5 and 4 % tax values for calculations. But issue is that taxes are changeable in future so I want to create dynamic template which takes care for tax calculations. I thought of to create an array to store distinct tax values from XML data and then to perform calculation but don’t know how to do that.
Can some body help me out as this is very critical and urgent?
Note: Tax calculation can be done at line item level itself but there are some scenarios where additional discounts are there so tax calculation can not be done at line item level.
Below is the sample XML data
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ListOfBipActionTest>
- <Action>
<AccountId>1</AccountId>
<PartName>17211KCC900LS</PartName>
<TAX>12.5</TAX>
<QTY>40</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>47.06</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>15.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
- <Action>
<AccountId>2</AccountId>
<PartName>17213KCC900LS</PartName>
<TAX>12.5</TAX>
<QTY>50</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>19.53</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>8.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
- <Action>
<AccountId>3</AccountId>
<PartName>28302KAG900S</PartName>
<TAX>12.5</TAX>
<QTY>50</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>59.49</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>15.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
- <Action>
<AccountId>4</AccountId>
<PartName>2830AKAG900S</PartName>
<TAX>12.5</TAX>
<QTY>10</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>168.7</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>15.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
- <Action>
<AccountId>4</AccountId>
<PartName>91001GF6000S</PartName>
<TAX>4.00</TAX>
<QTY>60</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>115.34</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>17.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
</ListOfBipActionTest>
Thanks
AshishDear Efstratios Kara,
I installed SAP Integration Kit 3.1. Yes I installed the integration kit after installing CR.
I have uninstalled the earlier version and i have reinstalled CR with (12.3.0.601) version.
But still i cant view the SAP connectivity. can u tell me from which version they have included this connectivity option in CR.
If CR going to support SAP Table connectivity on specific version, what is that version.
Waiting for your reply.
Regards,
Suman -
Tax Calculation for Service Process at service entry level
Hi all ,
We have Service process where the tax calculation is Purchase Item level and the Tax calcaulation is happening from there .
and also during MIRO .
system is not able to determine the tax calculation at service entry level , how can we achieve this ?
can some help me on this .
thanks ,
ksrHi,
please check additionally the following OSS notes:
495316 Taxes with services
See consulting Note 498878 for information about the functioning of
taxes for service documents.
For service orders, you can set in Customizing (Transaction ML100 or the
following path: -> Materials Management -> External Services Management
-> Taxes at Individual Service Level) whether the taxes are calculated
at individual service level or at item level.
If you set the 'Taxes at individual service level' indicator for a
country, you can maintain tax data (tax indicator MWSKZ and tax
jurisdiction code TXJCD) in a purchase order at service level AND at
item level in Customizing.
The tax calculation only occurs at service level.
Regards,
Edit -
Subsequent debit tax calculating wrong
dear guru
while doing subsequent debit for the vendor the Excise duty is calculating wrong
my issue is like this
i have purchase 100 quty with value 10/kg total amount is 1000 for that
ED is calculated 140
Ecess calculated 3
S&H calculated 1
i have done goods receipt and posted invoice also
now i that part of the quantit i have returne
lets 50 kg i have retune for that MIRO,MIGO,JIS,J1iV i have done
next vendor will send the suplimentry invocie because the rate is increase for that 50 quantiy, for that i will do J1IH for the additional excise and i will do MIRO subsequent debit for the rate increse in miro the tax amount is calculating wrong, ie
lets for 50 quantity total amoun increased 100
ed should calculate 14 but it is calculating 28
for that i have to apply any note
pl tell me urgent
thanks
regards
jrpMy understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
Correct Entry should be:
Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
Expense A/C............Dr 30000
Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer. -
Hello,
While creating a sales order through VA01, we are passing additional fields to the pricing structures using the user exit<b> 'EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001'</b> . Here, we are setting the value of <b>'ch_user_changed_fields-accnt_no'</b> to the ship to party partner number. Now, we have a change in requirement, which says that we need to set the item level bill to party instead of ship to party. The problem we are facing is that this exit does not get hit when the bill to party is changed, but gets hit when the ship to party is changed.
Does this have anything to do with the config, or is there any other exit that can be used?
Please let me know if you have a solution or have done something similar..
Thanks
DeepaHello,
subject is little bit surprize me becoz you want change partner functions of sales order why do call it as tax calculation any way partner functions can be changed in sales order <b>MV45AFFZZ and userexit_save_document_prepare</b> exit. partners storing in XVBPA internal table.
loop at xvbpa.
do your logic here.
endloop.
Note : Header partner function can be identified by <b>posnr 000000</b> and <b>item is 000010,000020</b> and so on.
let me know if you want any clarifications.
**********Poorna********** -
CA: Additional Tax infotype 462 and 463
Requirement is to capturing additional tax and taken from employee pay.
I want to know can I delimit the existing IT462 and IT463 and create a new IT462 and 463 for one pay period deduct additional tax (Fed and Provincial) and change the infotype back to original form after deducting addition tax (one time ) from employee pay.
Please let me know is there any implication of this workaround on future tax calculation or year end activities.
Or to divide capturing amount in 12 (Monthly pay period)and deduct from employee pay every month,
Please advise.
Thanks in advanceHi Karthik,
Yes Few employees are from Quebec and few are from ontario.
I did delimit IT 462 and 463.
I can see additional fed and prvovincial tax in /306 and /356 and additional amount added in /302 and /352.
However instead of deducting from employee payement /559 it goest into claim /561.
And user wants to deduct it from /559. ( Employee has enough money to deduct additional fed and prov tax).
Please let me know what can I do or is it a normal process.
Thanks, -
Dear forum,
In tax processing in accounting OBCN, tax type 3 is additional tax.
May I know why the process not in OB40? I see only input and out tax in OB40.
Also what is the purpose of additional tax and how to post?
ThanksHi Eloy,
Read somthing on Retroactive Conditioins,, these are utilized to calculated values on backdated documents.
See if this helps.
Mohammed -
Dear All,
Presently In payroll system income tax calculation is based on allowance paid basis. but our client is required that is projected bais. for example
presently if am paying bonus through info type 15 rs 100,000 then system is deducting tax from remaining month in equal installment but client is required that it has to be deducted one time at this month.
please help me
BMSDear All,
I read the attached document in sap note i.e.1024284 in this sap note attached document is Guideline.pdf in this document they have clearly mention that ....
Introduction
There may be a need to apply flat tax rate on irregular payments for a particular month. If
they are required to be taxed separately it is not possible to do in the regular payroll run
in the system currently. Currently the system supports TDS at different rate on these
payments through offcycle payroll run. This document explains how this can be achieved
during regular run.
It means if we applied this note then system will deduct flat % on bonus amount if i am wrong please tell me the fact
BMS -
Income Tax Calculation problem: Urgent Help Needed
Dear Gurus,
I am facing a unique problem. Our client has two incentives
1) Product Incentive
2) Sales Incentive
Every month incentive figures get changed. These two are Monthly Regular Income (Cumulations Class 24) i.e. included in annual tax calculation.
Now for tax calculation, my client wants "Actual Earning" and "Estimated Earning for the rest of the year" to be different. But Income tax calculation in SAP (for the month of April 2007) takes Actual Earning and multiplied it by 12( i.e. 11+1) to calculate Estimated Earning. But my client wants this Estimated Earning to be different.
Now please let me know is this possible in SAP system and how to calculate this?
Your help will be highly appreciated
Waiting for an early reply.
Thanking You,
With Best Regards,
PratikHi,
I am not understand your problem give your mb then i talk to you
mhpo -
Hi Friends,
I have a Issue in Income Tax calculation,
for the month of September, the form 16 for a particular employee is a follows
Form 16 summary
Gross Salary 783,399.00
Exemption U/S 10 5,600.00
Balance 777,799.00
Empmnt tax (Prof Tax) 1,125.00
Aggrg Deduction 1,125.00
Incm under Hd Salary 776,674.00
Gross Tot Income 725,513.00
Agg of Chapter VI 106,008.00
Total Income 619,510.00
Tax on total Income 90,853.00
Tax payable and surcharg 93,579.00
Tax deducted so far 24,100.00
Income Tax 9,926.00
Now i have added a wage Type called Special pay -Rs.100000 in IT 15, eventhough this amount is reflecting in monthly gross salary and RT table, this amount is not considered for Income tax . I.e with or without Wage type Special pay, The gross salary considred for Income Tax is 783399(without any change). Why it is so.
Rgds,
Sekar.Hi Sekar,
Make sure that you have assigned the right processing and cumulation classes to your wage type in table V_512W_D
Make sure that in table V_512W_D cumulation class 1 is ticked for this wagetype.
Warm Regards,
Kapil Kaushal -
AP Tax Calculation issue with SINGLE TAX vs TAX GROUP
Hi Gurus,
i need your help on below, please advise!!
i have to calculate ap VAT tax on AP invoice,
(Rounding = nearest, precession=2, tax calcualtion= Include tax)
if i calculate 5% is the tax rate, then the tax amount is 0.47cents,this is in case of single tax calculation.
here my requirement was i need calculate 2 Taxes(TAX A AND TAX B (Rates are 5 AND 5%)
EG:
Invoce Base amount = 10 dollars
in case of single tax = 5/105 * 10 = 0.4761 cents(this is 48cents in apps with rouning nearest and precession 2)
tax mode = Include tax
In case of tax group = Tax A and Tax B = 5 + 5 = 10%, when i calculate this in apps its showing 45cents and 45 cents as tax A and B
why this tax caluclation is different with single tax and tax group.
tax code actual amount tax amount remaining amount
single tax 10 0.4761 10 - 0.48cents = 9.52 cents
tax group 10 45+45=90 cents 9.10 cents
Please Help !!!
Thanks,
SatishHi Vineeth,
This is Kathy from BSI Support. I wanted to make sure that you understood that the TF80 Like Reciprocal flag was made available in TF90 for testing purposes only. This was meant as a tool for customers to be able to compare their TF90 results to their TF80 output, to insure a successful upgrade. This funcitonality, however, was never intended to be utilized going forward. There have been significant changes implemented in BSI TaxFactory 9.0 regarding multi-state withholding (also known as reciprocity). There is information available on our website that explains these changes. If you log onto our website, please look under the "Whats New" section for an explanation of reciprocal functionality in BSI TaxFactoryu2122 9.0
If you have specific scenarios that you need help with, please contact us and we will be happy to assist you.
Regards,
BSI Support - Kathy -
Excise not captured in the MIGO & Tax calculation is not correct in the PO.
Excise Settings completed. 02.11.2007
a) Configuration done as per J05 Building block.( Tax Procedure TAXINN)
b) Maintained J1ID, all steps.
c) Maintained tax code in FTXP.
d) FV11  Maintained for Material, vendor, Plant in combination with Tax code input tax maintained in FTXP.
e) Checked CIN Health, all tick are green.
f) Given all G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type (ETT)
g) Maintained all number Ranges.
Issue  1)
Tax calculation is not correct in the PO, tax tab
a) JMIP is appearing 12% in condition amount, (as per condition record) but condition value is Zero, (Not calculated by the FI Pricing procedure). Screen shot for Pricing procedure, PO taxes and condition record given below.
b) JIPC Sales tax 4% in condition amount (as per condition record) , calculated by the FI Pricing procedure is 8%, condition value is Rs 8 instead of Rs 4
Fi pricing procedure.
PO Taxes  wrong Tax calculated
FV11 Condition record
Issue  2)
While creating Goods receipt aginst PO (Tax code V2 in PO). Movement type 101, Excise tab appears at Header and Item level and we need to put the Vendors Excise Invoice and date, nothing is copied from the PO for Excise duty & sales tax.
Now we put the values for ED and Sales tax manually in the MIGO and saved the document. While display material document, excise tab is not there i.e. no excise related activiy is captured here in goods receipt.
If you need more detail, please revert on cell 093295 53235.
Please suggest.
Manish Gupta
93295 53235
[email protected]Hai,
1.Check the condition types JMIP & JMIC in IMG - Financial accting New - FI AC Global settings - Taxes on sales and purchases - Check calculation procedure - Define condition type.
2.The condition types you have used are defined for non deductible taxes i.e., it gets inventorised, added to the material account.And also the accural key assigned to this condition types are NVV - defined for non ded input taxes.
3.Instead the condition types defined by SAP Standard system for BED & ST are JMOP & JIPS and the accurals assigned to this are VS1 & VS5.
If you want clear details mail the screen shots to my id [email protected] -
Hi All
We are creating POs from interface program "Import Standard Purchase Order Program". Only for few of the POs, we are encountering the error 'Warning: An error occurred during tax calculation
. Please correct the problem or contact your system administrator.'
This error is happening for few PO's, other POs with same vendor, ship to and bill to location created successfully by the program
Any inputs on how to resolve this error is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
BrajeshHi Hussein,
Thank for the prompt response.
We have already applied the patch related to doc 1272684.1.
Below are the environment detail.
Database: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
Application : 12.1.3
Diagnostic tool output :-
INTERFACE_
TRANSACTION_ID
INTERFACE_TYPE
COLUMN_NAME
PROCESSING_DATE
TABLE_NAME
ERROR_MESSAGE_NAME
ERROR_MESSAGE
100148
PO_DOCS_OPEN_INTERFACE
09-Aug-2013
PO_HEADERS_INTERFACE
PO_PDOI_TAX_CALCULATION_ERR
Warning: An error occurred during tax calculation. Please correct the problem or contact your system administrator.
Log file :-
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Purchasing: Version : 12.0.0
Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
POXPOPDOI module: Import Standard Purchase Orders
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Current system time is 09-AUG-2013 21:09:04
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------
| Starting concurrent program execution...
+-----------------------------
Arguments
STANDARD
N
INCOMPLETE
12805
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Start of log messages from FND_FILE
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
To get the log messages for PDOI, please use the following id to query against FND_LOG_MESSAGES table:
AUDSID = 12076063
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
End of log messages from FND_FILE
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Executing request completion options...
Output file size:
69
+------------- 1) PRINT -------------+
Printing output file.
Request ID : 55116524
Number of copies : 0
Printer : noprint
+--------------------------------------+
Finished executing request completion options.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Concurrent request completed successfully
Current system time is 09-AUG-2013 22:27:42
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Brajesh -
Hi All,
I am SRM functional guy but trying to analyze a issue we are having - Via SRM when we create Shopping Cart and send to backend for PO creation(Classic Scenario), Shopping cart item says 'Error in Transmission' and when I look at RZ20 it says 'For ERS Tax calculation has to be setup'.
Please advise
Thanks a lot.
RaoHi,
For the ERS vendor the tax code is mandetory and the tax code which u are entering in SC,Please check in FTXP the tax code settings.
Or if you want to avoide this error, use non ERS vendor in SC.
Regards,
Manish
Maybe you are looking for
-
Disk Repair Boot from OSX Disc...
Have a bad issue: my iMac has been found (using disk verify) to be corrupt. It tells me to boot from the installation disc to repair. Only problem is my DVD SuperDrive is dead! How can I boot from a disc if the drive won't mount? I've used three othe
-
any suggestions????? please!!
-
I phone 4s got hot and now does not turn on.
Good morning! My fiance's iPhone 4s does not turn on. This morning I unpluged it from the charger and as usal played some radio on the dock (logitech mm50) via internet. In half an hour we were ready to leave. Neither she, nor me had noticed when the
-
HT4864 I started have an issue with sending mail out of my me account.
I use a PC. Some mail is not reaching the recipients that I have had no problem sending email and attachments to in the past. Showing as sent in my icloud sent folder. They are checking their junkfolders and it isn't getting stuck there . Never had p
-
How to convert columns into rows using transpose function
Hi anybody tell me how to convert columns values into rows using transpose function.