Additive costs and LSMW

Hi ,
I have LSMW for Additive cost upload, but unfortunately we have additive cost for all materilas valid up to 9999 year so when ever we use LSMW for upload we need to hit (as it gives that screen showing previous additive cost estimate as it over laps) ENTER for so many times until we finish all materilas, so
can any one please tell me how to delete all additive costs which is maintainted till 9999 , so that we don't get any messages during LSMW upload?
Paartha

Suraj,
Don't mind As both my issues are inte-rrelated I am dragging our conversaton, I saw that Field in KEKO-KKZMA, but it is Just a indicator that says this product is having some Additive costs, But not the Dollar amount,
S_ALR_87099930 the regular cost estimates report from the Field selection I can Have Additive costs but even this shows Blank, i really wonder "where can I see the actual dollar amount" or any Document that saves the data, Just Like a price change Document, as you said you guys developed the Z report (to be frank I couldn't do this in My last Project, Now I got the same requirement here with new Client) , If you can let me know the main Tables you (MARA, MARC, MBEW, KEKO, KEPH) you took as base,?
and where can I see actaul dollar amount, even in CK76N It won't show "the dolalr amount" for materials it Just Lists all materilas from where you need to Click and go in side to see the dollar amount,
If you want you can reply to below thread I will close this Thread,
Additive costs :Report
Regards
Paartha

Similar Messages

Additive Cost and Variance Calcultion

We started using Tcode CK74N to enter additive costs for certian materials. I did the configuration needed in the costing variant and added a cost element for additive costs in the cost component structure.
Everything is working fine, when we run CK11n for a material that already have an additive cost estimate, the additive costs are being picked up and included in the cost estimate. if we mark and release the cost estimate the additive costs are being reflected in the new standard, so far so good.
My question is around the variance postings that happen once we enter a production order and settle the variance at period end.
lets look at this example
Assume the following:
Material X current standard = $100
Order X quantity produced =10 cases
Material X NEW standard after negative additive cost =$80
Scenario 1 (no additive costs) the total debits (Actual postings form material consumption and activity confirmation) to a the order = $900
The total credit was $1000 (standard*quantity produced) , a $100 in variance will occur, and the posting at settlement will be to Debit the price difference account and to credit the cost of sales account for $100. This is the normal case
Scenario 2 : We included a -$200 of additive costs for that material in the standard (new Standard is 80) , the credit to the order will be $800 instead of $1000 , which will make the variance -$200 and the posting currently is to DR cost of sales and credit price difference account for $200
The business and Based on scenario 2 wants to automatically generate a posting to the ACTUAL side of the production order equivalent to the additional variance caused by additive costs? which will put the variance back at 100.
They would like to see a credit to the cost element used in the cost component structure to book additive costs. and the reminder of the variance 100 in our example should continue to be booked to the same price different account .
If this is possible and right to do? what account should be used to offset this credit that being proposed to the additive cost element ? Because I assume that a new FI document should be created to record the credit?
Thanks for your help

Hey,
It depends a little upon the settlement rule of your process/production order.
If you are settling to the material (MAT), the price difference will only be accounted for with one line, without separation between difference coming from additive costs and other differences.
If you are settling not via within CO, you maybe have the possibility the way you settle, but I can not see how you can use such a logic in a settlement process.
What I would do, is to create a custom reposting program, which reposts the additive cost difference separately, after which the normal settlement can take care of the remaining difference.
Regards,
Koen

Product calculation in combination with additive cost and mixed costing

Hello all,
I want to calculate trading good. I have defined a mixed costing for this article. Additional I had entered additive costs for the same article. When I run the calculation, it works only with the definitions of the mixed costing. Does the calculation take either the mixed costing or the additive cost?
Best regards
Jürgen

We also faced similar issue & had approched SAP for the same. As clarified by SAP, additive cost with mixed costing is not supported.
You may try using reference costing variant for this.
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar

Additive cost not seen in production order and while settling hits PRD

I am using additive costs for my product costing via CK74n.
Cost estimate looks good since I have the valuation variants setup to include additive costs.
But when I see the production order that is being created, all others costs are being considered except additive costs. They are recognized but not as a line item instead as a variance. When I settle the order the costs actually hit price difference account and not even the GL account that I had assigned for the additive cost. SAP did not consider the cost as variance even if it was showing up as variance initially. This as I understood is partly because of the settlement rule that I have in place which tells SAP to go and settle on the material (which is standard SAP to do since I want all the costs from the production order to settle on the eventual material going into stock) so SAP went on to settling on the material. Since the material is set as standard price the variance is being booked as a price difference entry.
Ideally I would have expected the additive cost getting debited to the order and credited to the gl account that I assigned for the additive cost. The eventual cost (incl. additive cost) should hit the inventory.
Am I missing a step?

Hi Sapluver,
Appreciate your prompt response..Please see my response in italics
Few queries related to your post.
1. So your standard cost got two part, one with quantity structure ( materials, labor, OSC etc) which the system cost automatically and one manual part, which is your additive cost. While costing system picks up this manual part from CK74N.
I hope this part you got correct. Yes, the cost estimate is reading from both the qty structure and the additive costs and the cost roll-up is coming up correctly
2. Now in actual cost controlling, i think System is not sure how to valuate your additive cost actual part.I agree, the additive cost does appear in the cost analysis section of the production order but does not show up as a line item initially. Instead it comes up as a difference item right in the bottom of the screen after totals have been displayed without any line item reference. As if the system is not sure how to display the line item. Once I have done the material issuance confirmation to the order, the additive cost got picked up correctly as I have set it up in the cost component structure as material overhead but again shows up only as variance
Which method you used to debit your production order with additive cost, is it a normal journal entry or through some automatic posting through routing ( example OSC through Purchase order/Good Receipt).I probably need to understand your point more clearly? I am not manually debiting the production order at all for the additive cost. I was expecting SAP to debit the order the same way it does for overheads. Overheads too initially show up as variance but then when we run the overhead calculation KGI2 the overheads costs get debited to the production order. Was expecting similar behavior for additive costs. I am receiving the finished product from the production order into stock via MIGO goods receipt movement type 101. I was expecting the debit to happen perhaps at the time of settlement via CO88 but here the system posted it to the price difference account via account key PRD. This I understand the system did because the settlement rule is set to post all the costs on the material and the material has the valuation control as standard price; so the system is seeing the additive cost as a price difference hence posting it to the price difference account.
System is unaware of the additive cost from actual cost point of view, there is no specification to additive cost from costing variant for actual cost. So you have to debit the order with the additive cost part.So do I manually debit the order with the additive cost? What about the price difference additive cost sitting on the order? Would appreciate if you can tell me the process steps for posting this correctly
regards
Sapluver

Additional cost for finished goods

Hi all,
Here we are following fifo method valuation. we are using SAP B1 2007B PL 04.
I have a doubt how do we account the additional cost like Rent, Electricity etc.
and What G/L Account need to specify at determination level. Here we are determing G/L account with account groups.
I have a document for that but that doesnt give me clear picture of additional cost and
G/L accounts.
Kindly explain me in details with respectives to G/L Accounts
Regards
Shashi

Hi Shashi,
static costs should be included in a BOM as standard cost items. This will add to the item cost of the finished product.
Have a look at our Wiki here (Expert on Phone Newsletter April 2008):
[How to include labour cost in a BOM.|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/Howtoincludelabourcostina+BOM.]
You can substitute other costs for 'labour'.
All the best,
Kerstin

LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in Stock and

Problem:
we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
The result should be:
- From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
- Do not change the quantity
- Having the total cost of stock
- Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
Example:                                                                                data
ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30          01/07/2008
MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298          07/07/2008
MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298       07/08/2008
Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
So in the end I should have:
batch n° 298 - kg 1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
thanks

Hi Rahul,
In My GRPO in all there are e items in 2, 3 and 4 qty respectively.
During GRPO:
Finished Product=149610
During Landed Cost:
Finished Product= 35764.22
So (149610+35764.22)/GRPO Qty (9) = Per Unit Cost during GRPO (20597.135)
Now when you sale against above GRPO then
you COGS Will be
In my invoice i sold all the above items in qty 1 each so
COGS= Per Unit Cost during GRPO ( 20597.135) * Sales Qty(3) Dr,
Finished Product= 32634.71 (CR) does not come to this
So this Finished Product 32634.71 (CR) is nothing but Per Unit Cost during GRPO*Sales Qty
Am i doing something wrong ?
Thanks
Malhaar

Is bridge a part of the photography package (Photoshop CC and Lightroom)? Or is there an additional cost?

Is bridge a part of the photography package (Photoshop CC and Lightroom)? Or is there an additional cost?

I've always found Adobe's website remarkably unhelpful on this point.
It repeatedly promotes the fact that you get Photoshop + Lightroom in a single package - but minimal info on other inclusions.
The most succinct explanation of all inclusions I can find is at the ever reliable:
Adobe Gives Ongoing Discount for Photoshop CC + Lightroom Plan | ProDesignTools

Additive Cost Estimate Report

Hi Gurus ,
We need a additive cost estimate Report that would show the Material,Plant, additive cost (in dollars NOT "x" as shown in KEKO or KEPH table).
for the above I tried a simple Querry with MARC-KEKO-KEPH (didn't conside MBEW-MARA) , in SQ01 But the end resul is same as KEKO table Just Showing the "x" mark,
Users can not go for individual validation after doing a Mass upload of CK76N using LSMW so would like to see a detailed report with Dollar amount and comare it with their Books.
I searched SDN for this kind of report But no useful information,
Your Help Greately Appreciated,
Note: please don't say Use, KEKO, KEPH tables,Thank you ,
Sandhya

You can look at Functional Modules in SE37. You can as well execute them in test in the tcode to provide the input values, it would show the out put values as well.
You need to provide your requirements by explaining what you are achieving in CK76n and how they are stored in Tables KEKO, etc... and ask him to build a program using the above functional modules.
Infact if the above functional modules doesnot work, you can ask the ABAPer to use the same function modules used in CK76n to get the information and make the requirement changes to meet your requirements.
Edited by: Suraj Ramamurthy on Dec 9, 2008 2:33 PM

If I wanted to exchange my iPhone 5 for the new iPhone 6 (no additional cost after $199 gift card from selling iPhone 5) do I have to pre-order online or do I just have to show up at a Verizon store Sept 19th?

If I wanted to exchange my iPhone 5 for the new iPhone 6 (no additional cost after $199 gift card from selling iPhone 5) can I pre-order online now or do I just have to show up at a Verizon store Sept 19th?

scodaddy, that is a wonderful question. We are super excited about the new iPhone. You can always pre-order your new iPhone online and then start the mail in rebate by following this link: http://bit.ly/GGnDDC Or you can always go into the store location and do it all in store on the 19th when the phone is launched. That would depend on if the store has them in stock when you go in. I hope that this was able to address your concern.
KevinR_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Use of template using CPT1 for charging an additional cost to the product

Hello,
I'm trying to charge an additional cost burden to the cost of my product for every base unit produced. (cost estimate)
I have created a template using transaction CPT1 with sender as Cost Center / Activity Type in environment 001
The activity type is measured in EA (Eaches) while we make our product in boxes (Product base unit of measure is 'Boxes') with say 20 Eaches going into a Box
I have maintained an activity price using transaction KP26 at say $0.55 per Each
I have assigned this template to my costing sheet , valuation area and overhead key using transaction KTPF
When I now cost the material for costing lot size of a 1000 boxes, it still charges the product with the activity price per Each ($0.55) instead of multiplying $0.55*20*1000 = $11,000 for a 1000 boxes
The formula I have chosen in the template against 'Plan quantity ' is in the attachment enclosed:
I need help with doing the right thing within the template to make it give a cost burden of $11000 for every 1000 boxes costed (costing lot size)

Didn't realize that you have to use transaction CPTD to charge template overhead to production orders. That's why it was not working. Now it is posting by reading the confirmed yield. But it is still not converting eaches to boxes using the conversion factor in the material master.
The formula I'm currently using in the template for actual quantity is as under:
OrderYieldConfirmed / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit
= 'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )
Please tell me what I need to do to the above formula to make it convert boxes to eaches using conversion factor in the material master?
A similar formula has worked beautifully for 'cost estimate'
OrderTotalQuantity / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit =
'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )

LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse

Subject: LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse and not accounting for the year 2008)
Problem:
we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
The result should be:
- From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
- Do not change the quantity
- Having the total cost of stock
- Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
Example:                                                                                data
ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30               01/07/2008
MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298                      07/07/2008
MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298           07/08/2008
Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
So in the end I should have:
batch n° 298 - kg 1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
thanks

Thomas,
I presume that your client has activated 'Revenue Recognition' component in SAP.
If your client has already activated the RR component, they may be aware that the activation is unreversible.
Recognition of costs in a deferred revenue scenario requires some customization effort but definitely do-able. It is not falling within standard SAP.
I worked on scope of one such project but it did not happen unfortunately.
Can you please post your regular updates in this forum?
All the best.
Thanks
PS: I am not an employee of SAP AG and by answering questions, I am not getting any monetary benefits anywhere. I am answering questions here in my spare time for recognition and the points awarded, which gives me a sense of self-satisfaction. Awarding points is also a way of saying thanks and it will encourage me to answer more questions and share my knowledge and experience

In LSMW, what is diff between LSMW-BAPI and LSMW-IDOC

hello all
In LSMW, what is diff between LSMW-BAPI and LSMW-IDOC

Hi Swamy,
The differences between IDoc and BAPI are as follows:
IDOC
IDocs are text encoded documents with a rigid structure that are used to exchange data between R/3 and a foreign system.
Idocs are processed asynchronously and no information whatsoever is returned to the client.
The target system need not be always online. The IDOC would be created and would send the IDOC once the target system is available (tRFC concept). Hence supports guaranteed delivery.
With asynchronous links the sub-process on the client can be finished even if the communication line or the server is not available. In this case the message is stored in the database and the communication can be done later.
The disadvantage of asynchronous links is that the sub-process on the server cannot return information to the calling sub-process on the client. A special way for sending information back to the client is required. In addition, a special error handling mechanism is required to handle errors on the receiving side.
IDOCs may be more changeable from release to release.
IDOCs are poorly documented.
BAPI
BAPIs are a subset of the RFC-enabled function modules, especially designed as Application Programming Interface (API) to the SAP business object, or in other words: are function modules officially released by SAP to be called from external programs.
BAPIs are called synchronously and (usually) return information.
For BAPIs the client code needs to do the appropriate error handling.
Problems with synchronous links occur if the communication line or the server is temporarily not available. If this happens, the sub-process on the client cannot be finished (otherwise there would be data inconsistencies).
Synchronous links have the advantage that the sub-process on the server can return values to the sub-process on the client that has started the link.
BAPIs are not totally immune to upgrades.
BAPIs are reasonably well documented.
Reward points if useful.
Best Regards,
Sekhar

To add additional cost to specific cst component in cst component structure

Hi All,
We have an issue related to Product Costing.
The requirement is to add 5% additional cost to one specific cost component in cost component structure related to material handling (now coming as variable cost). The assigned cost elements to this cost component have cost element category as 41 (overhead rates). The requirement is to display this 5% additional cost on the single cost component only in cost component split.
If anyone has worked on similar requirement, could you please let me know how to proceed on this.
Thanks in advance for your valuable feedback.
Thanks & Regards,
Darshanjeet Singh Sachdeva

Hi
Use CK74N.. You can add the value you want and also the cost ele of your choice.. Save it in CK74N
Now when you run CK11N, the cost you added in CK74N would get added to CK11N's own cost
br, Ajay M

Additional Costs on a Purchase Order

Hi Guys,
I wonder if anyone can help with this. We have a scenario where we are buying product from one supplier at a certain price and then paying an amount to another supplier for the use of their logo on this product. The scenario is a little like delivery costs in that we would receive an invoice for the additional costs which we would then want to post against the PO in order to influence the MAP for the product. For example, we may buy @ £10 each and pay £1 each for the right to use the logo. What is the best way of implementing this requirement?

Hi,
If you have one price condition for freight costs, for example, just go to the IMG activity and create another one by copy.
On the PO, add that same new price condition, and on the loupe enter the price condition and change the vendor.
Then, on the incoming invoice, choose 3 - Goods receipt + planned costs, and Layout - 7_6310 All information.
Cheers.

Import Duty 10% & Additive Cost

Hi Guru,
Is there possibilty to create % in additive cost. Eg Import need to be incorporate into the costing run of the raw material.
If can, please advice how to do it and cannot advice how to bring this cost into the coting run.
Hope to hear from you soon.
Thanks.
Regards,
Kulasingam Balasingam

Hi
A material cost estimate in which you can enter costs manually in the form of a unit cost estimate, so that the manual costs can be added to an automatic cost estimate with quantity structure.
To ensure that the additive costs are included, set the indicator Incl. additive costs for each valuation strategy in the valuation variant in Customizing for Product Cost Planning.
Specify the following through the costing variant in Customizing for Product Cost Planning:
o Whether any existing additive costs are to be included in cost estimates that you create with this costing variant
o Whether the additive costs are to be included when calculating overhead
o Whether the additive costs are to be included when transferring stock to another plant.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di471/helpdata/EN/7e/cb81fa43a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Regards

Additive costs and LSMW

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for