ADF BC Base Classes Configuration by Application possible ?

I configured the base classes to use in Tools -> Preferences -> Business Components -> Base Classes
This works fine, but when changing to other application I have the same base classes which is a problem if you have different base classes per application.
Is this possible, any workaround ?
Thanks,
Claudio.

I think you should make changes at project level instead of IDE level.
Tools -> Project Properties -> Business Components -> Base Classes
Hope this helps.
Luis R.

Similar Messages

Can a derived class catch base class object

can a derived class object catch a base class object
e-g if i have a class
class Test {
// code
}and
class Test2 extends Test {
}and lets say there is a method that return an object of Test (base class), so is it possible to write
Test2 t=getTestObj(); // i-e subclass holding base class objectif its not.. how can we do so? so that derived class should hold base class object....

sorry..
here is how it goes
i have a function a class
public Test getObj() {
// code
}The constraint is that i cant change the implementation of this above function.
Now when i call this function, it returns me a Test object. But i cant do
Test t=getObj();because the Test class is written purely in java whereas i want to use write a new Test class that implements the same functionality [using the above given function] in JNI.
so what i did, i created a new package [nativ] and created a class "Test" in that. But since i have to use the function that returns me Test and not "nativ.Test", so what i did, i inherited nativ.Test from "Test" so that the object might resolve the reference.
So this is it.. that i cant modify the function and i need some way to do it.. plz reply

?Is it possible to create a javafx class without extending Application class ? If yes, how

Is it possible to create a javafx class without extending Application class ? If yes, how ?

There is no such thing as a javafx class. It is a regular java class. The Aapplication class is the entry
point for JavaFX application. You have to extend the Application class to create Javafx application .

The definition of base class Application was not found.

Hello:
I have been coding in Flash Builder Burrito and publishing to my Xoom for a few weeks. All of a sudden at the end of the day I'm getting this compiler error which says:
1017: The definition of base class Application was not found. AppName.mxml /AppName/src Unknown Flex Problem
I sometimes hit the wrong key with I try to copy and paste and all of a sudden a new window will open for source of a default component which I never wanted to edit. I'm afraid I somehow deleted or modified the default class defnition of Application?
I don't understand why this would come out of the blue, I was working on a function within a class that was drawing points ... Then all off a sudden I'm getting this error and it's driving me nuts.
I tried to reinstall FB Burrito on my Mac, but after all that work it still says the same thing. Wouldn't it replace the default class defs?
Please help!

Wow, some really strange behavior.
OK, so here is what I'm going through. I reinstall, import the project and compiles.
Then I uncomment the new section which contains the following code:
lineStyle(1.0,0x8ea4bf);
var line_commands:Vector.<int> = new Vector.<int>();
line_commands.push(GraphicsPathCommand.LINE_TO, GraphicsPathCommand.LINE_TO, GraphicsPathCommand.LINE_TO, GraphicsPathCommand.LINE_TO);
var line_coord:Vector.<Number> = new Vector.<Number>();
line_coord.push(0,0, newW, angle, newW, (newH+angle), 0, newH);
drawPath(line_commands, line_coord);
I get 3 diffrent errors, which lead up to the error listed in the topic.
At first it says that "int" isn't a valid type and it points to this line:
var line_commands:Vector.<int> = new Vector.<int>();
Then I take int out so the line looks like this:
var line_commands:Vector = new Vector();
Then it says I can't nest classes and it points to the main MXML. I go to the main MXML then the error switches to say "The definition of base class Application was not found.".
I did figure out how to fix this with out reinstalling. I have to delete the project from my list (making sure to comment out the code above), then re-launch FB Burrito, then re-import the project and it works.
This is way nuts! I dont understand ... am I crazy?

Compilation error: "The definition of base class Application was not found."

Hi,
I imported my Flash Builder 4.6 project to the 4.7 pre-release version. My application use a CustomSystemManager (in order to force the loading of a "TextContainerManager", I'm using latest TextLayoutFramework 3.0.0.29).
I had no error with previous versions (Flex SDK 4.5 and Flex SDK 4.6).
My application is main.mxml :
<myapp:MyApp>
</myapp:MyApp>
myapp/MyApp.as :
package myapp {
          import spark.components.Application;
          [Frame(factoryClass="skyrockchat.CustomSystemManager")]
          public class MyApp extends Application {
        public function MyApp() {
          super();
myapp/CustomSystemManager.as :
package myapp {
          import flashx.textLayout.container.TextContainerManager;
          import mx.managers.SystemManager;
          public class CustomSystemManager extends SystemManager
                    public function CustomSystemManager()
                              var c:Class = TextContainerManager; // force the inclusion of this class
                              super();
If I right click on the "Application" word and then "Open declaration", the correct class from spark.components is opened...
I don't know if this is a bug or a side effect... ^^

The packages of the CustomSystemManager don't seem to match:
[Frame(factoryClass="skyrockchat.CustomSystemManager")] has "skyrockchat" as the package and another place says to put CustomSystemManager in package "myapp".
myapp/CustomSystemManager.as :
package myapp {
When I changed "skyrockchat" to "myapp" the project compiled.
-Darrell

What is base line configuration and final configuration

Hi
1. what is base line configuration and what is final configuration?
2.Can we calculate depreciation every day , if yes how plz explain?
3. what is the Organizational structure in FI , CO , and over all FICO and in Asset Accounting?
for 3rd one , in 1 interview for FI org structure i answered
CLIENT-COMPANY-COMPANY CODE- BUSINESS AREA
but the interviewer not satisfied, i checked in SAP LIBRARY there is also same,
if my ans is not correct plz tell me the correct org. structure,
and for Asset a/c ing in sap library 2 possible org structures r there 1 is
CLIENT-Chart of a/cs - Charf of Depre-Plant -B.area,
is it correct ,
plz can one answer for my doubts
thanks
thanks in advance

for your action............don,t confuse the structure....
1.FI Orgination Structure:
Client>Controlling Area>Company code>Plant->Storage Location--->Finished goods or Raw material
(ii)Co.code>Sales Org.>Distribution Channel-->Division
(iii)Co.code>Purchase Org>Product group
(iv)Co.code--> Business Area
2.AA Orgination Structure: Client> Chart of Depreciation>Depreciation Areas>Asset Classes->Company Code->Main Asset> Sub-asset.
3.CO Orgination Structure:Client>Controlling Area>Cost center or Internal Order or PCA or Produt Costing
Client/Operating Concern --> Co-PA

Definition of base class ByteArrayAsset was not found

I was able to run through the developer guide to get several simple applications going, but I'm getting stuck when trying to compile a game (using amxmlc) that uses Flex-style embeds to embed bitmap graphics.
The error I'm seeing is this: (I've included input for completeness. I am located inside the project directory.)
===
> ../flex/bin/amxmlc -default-size 320 480 -library-path engine.swc -source-path+=. -- scripts/Main.as
Loading configuration file /Users/jon/Desktop/iphone/flex/frameworks/air-config.xml
scripts/MyAssets_SceneList.as(10): col: 49 Error: The definition of base class ByteArrayAsset was not found.
(Repeats 10 times)
===
As directed in the guide, I downloaded the latest Flex SDK and dragged in the contents of the iPhone packager directory. And to reiterate, I was able to get several simple applications working on my iPad, so my setup should be correct.
Where have I gone wrong?

I've narrowed it down further. Emebds DO work, but it's particularly an embed that leads to a ByteArrayAsset that does not. In my case, I am embedding an XML file as an octet stream.
Any ideas? Thanks!

Where to put methods in a abstract base class - subclasses system

Hi,
I’d like to ask a question on some basic design practice.
When there are methods which are common in some subclasses so I would like to “move them up” in the base abstract class, I would also like to make sure that the ADT concept of the base class itself is not broken. So I don’t want to have methods in the base class that are not general enough to be there. How to resolve this?
For example I create a base abstract class Vehicle. Then I create subclasses Plane and Tanker and realize that the startEnginge() method in them is the same and in order remove the duplicated code, I can put it in Vehicle. But later there may be Bicycle or Sled subclasses which don’t need startEngine().
In a broader sense, I would like to keep the Vehicle class as similar to the real word concept of vehicles as possible. And not evey vehicle have engine of course.
What is the solution?
Extending the class hierarchy by injecting another abstract class between the base and the subclasses? (e.g: VehicleWithEngine)
I suppose I can’t use Interfaces because I need to have the common implemenations as well.
Thanks for any comments in advance,
lemonboston
ps: I am a beginner and don't know the terminology, so if there are programming expression for the followings for example, I would be thankful if someone could help with this too:
- moving common methods up in the class hierarchy
- injecting a class in the hierarchy
- abstract base class - subclasses system

lemonboston wrote:
Hi,
I’d like to ask a question on some basic design practice.
When there are methods which are common in some subclasses so I would like to “move them up” in the base abstract class, I would also like to make sure that the ADT concept of the base class itself is not broken. So I don’t want to have methods in the base class that are not general enough to be there. How to resolve this?
You are talking about code.
Instead you need to talk about the design.
The base class represents conceptually a 'type' of something. That 'type' defines behavior. That behavior is what goes in the base class nothing else (in terms of design.)
If you have common functionality which does not fit into the definition (design) of the 'type' then you put it in another class and use (composition) that class in the sub class.
For example I create a base abstract class Vehicle. Then I create subclasses Plane and Tanker and realize that the startEnginge() method in them is the same and in order remove the duplicated code, I can put it in Vehicle. But later there may be Bicycle or Sled subclasses which don’t need startEngine(). No that is not how it works.
You have specific examples of some vehicles and then you need to manage those types generically. That is the first step.
Second step is then to determine what the exact 'type' is that you want to manage. And you use the requirements of the need to create the 'type'.
Then you look at the specific examples to determine how they will meet the needs of the type.
Thus if I have an application that must start the engines of all the vehicles in the city then I must have a vehicle class which has startEngine.
But if I have an application that manages vehicles as inventory (like a retail store) and then decide that because my examples both have engines that I might as well move it into the base class. In that case there is no 'need' for the application to manage starting vehicles. The fact that both have engines is irrelevant.
So looking back at your example you have stated functionality about your specific types but you have not stated anything about why your application needs to deal with that functionality generically.
Another way to think about it is that you do not put the shared functionality in the base because you can but rather because you must.

Unable to locate specified base class 'resources.style1.HelpButtonIcon' for component class

Hi,
I have a Flex (4.1.0) project, which has many skinnable custom components. The application allows a user to choose another style which changes these skins via loading a new compiled CSS. These non-default skins are in a separate Flex project. I've not had a problem with this method until now.
The custom component I am skinning contains several icons which are defined in the component like this:
[SkinPart(required="true", type="mx.core.IVisualElement")]
public var componentIconHelp:IFactory;
then I use the iconRendererFunction to return the appropriate component part:
private function iconRendererFunction(item:Object):IFactory
     //truncated method
     return componentIconHelp;
Within the skin for "style1", I then have
<s:Skin xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
     xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
     xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"
     xmlns:style1="resources.style1.*">

<fx:Metadata>
     [HostComponent("myApp.components.ButtonComponent")]
</fx:Metadata>
<fx:Declarations>
     <fx:Component id="componentIconHelp">
          <style1:HelpButtonIcon />
     </fx:Component>
</Declarations>
When I try to compile this, I get the "Unable to locate specified base class 'resources.style1.HelpButtonIcon' for component class 'resources.style1.ButtonComponentSkinInnerClass0'" error.
If I remove the HelpButtonIcon from the <fx:Component> declaration, and just put it in the main body of the skin, it compiles and renders, but I need it to be a component (there's multiple components I have to choose from to display, similar to the ButtonBar skin).
Any ideas why it's not compiling and what I need to do to achive this?
Thanks

Thanks, one step closer (or further away :-)
I tried adding the airspark.swc to the library path for the project and it made no difference so I added:
-external-library-path /Applications/Adobe Flash Builder 4/sdks/4.0.0/frameworks/libs/air/airspark.swc
to the external tools configuration and now get the error:
command line: Error: unable to open 'Flash'
The project itself runs fine, it's only the ASDocs that's causing problems.

AS3: How to create one base class for classes loaded in multiple swfs?

Our application have 3 different modules and all use
fscommand and ExternalInterface alot. Now the problem is we are
combining all those modules, but they all will reside in different
swfs. Is there any way that they extend to same base class and its
static members have only one instance accessible by all
three?

Hi,
You can achieve this via Workshop 9.2 by using the exported Ant script for your project as follows:
-Ensure that all Jars needed to resolve com.bea.p13n.property.EntityPropertyManager (this particular class is found in weblogic92/common/p13n/lib/p13n_ejb.jar) and all referenced classes are added to the Java build path for your WebLogic EJB project (Properties->Java Build Path->Libraries)
-Export the "Workshop Ant Script" for your WebLogic EJB project (File->Export->Workshop Ant Script); this will generate a "build.xml" Ant script under your project root directory.
-Edit this default build script as follows: in the call to the "ejbgen" task within the "build" target, add the attribute: propertyFile="ejbgen.properties"
-Create a file "ejbgen.properties" under the root of your WebLogic EJB project and add the following entry:
YourSessionBeanClassName.remote.baseClass=com.bea.p13n.property.EntityPropertyManager
-Add a "<path refid="java.classpath"/>" within the "<classpath>" for the "java" task element that calls "weblogic.ejbc" (this will ensure that the p13n classes are resolved by EJBC)
Follow the instructions for executing the Ant build script found here: http://edocs.bea.com/workshop/docs92/ws_platform/ideuserguide/conUseCustomAntBuild.html
For more information on the EJBGen property file support, see: http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs92/ejb/EJBGen_reference.html

Class override, how to create the child class and then the base class

I started to write a program for a smart DMM, the problem is every version of the DMM the company change the communication commend.
My idea is to write a child class for every DMM version and every SubVI of the child will override the base class SubVI.
My problem is, i want first to create one child class and after i will see every thing is work, start to create the base class. that way i will see if am thinking the right way.
My question is
How can i create a child class and then create the base class and configure the SubVi of the child class to be Override of the base class?
I tried to search in the property of the class but i didn't see nothing.
Thanks
Solved!
Go to Solution.

This can be done and I've done it on occasion.
You simply create the base class with the dynamic dispatch methods you require (connector panes need to be identical to thos of the child class).
Then set the inheritance of the class to inherit from this base class. If your method is defined as a dynamic dispatch method in the parent, you'll most likely now have some errors (unless your child method was already DD in which case you might just be OK already).
To change the inheritance of a class, right-click the properties of the class in your project and select properties. I believe the ineritance tree is at the lower end of the properties. Click on the "change inheritance" (or something similar) to choose the class from which you now wish to inherit.
Say hello to my little friend.
RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

Can't read airport express base station configuration wirelessly

The setup:
2TB time capsule that takes the ethernet feed from the cable modem for internet access.
Airport express 802.11g plugged into speakers for Airtunes. No ethernet connection, just a wireless network.
The problem:
I can only read the airport express base station configuration when the mac is plugged into the time capsule by ethernet cable. This does not happen with the other mac I have on the network. It can connect to both the time capsule and the airport express without any problems. So unless I'm plugged in, iTunes and airtunes doesn't connect to the base station, and neither can Airfoil 3.5 or Airport Utility. Airport Utility does see the airport express. It just doesn't read the configuration wirelessly.
I think this had something to do with elgato eyetv not liking airfoil, but I can't say for sure.
Any thoughts?

When I switch it on all three lights flash, but then after a while the middle one stays on and nothing happens.
You posted in the AirPort Express area, but it sounds like you have an AirPort Extreme Base Station (AEBS)--correct?
If so, let's start by performing a complete power recycling of your network components to make sure that the BT Voyager router "recognizes" the AEBS.
Modem/Router Power Recycling - Quick
- Power-off the BT Voyager modem, AEBS, & computer(s); Wait at least 5 minutes.
- Power-on the BT Voyager modem; Wait at least 5 minutes.
- Power-on the AEBS; Wait at least 5 minutes.
- Power-on the computer(s)
If this fails to get the modem to "recognize" the Internet router, then try the "Full" version.
Modem/Router Power ReCycling - Full
- Power-off the BT Voyager modem, AEBS, & computer(s). (Wait at least 30 minutes. If possible, leave the modem off overnight.)
- Power-on the BT Voyager modem; Wait at least 30 minutes.
- Power-on the AEBS; Wait at least 5 minutes.
- Power-on the computer(s)

Difference between component configuration and application configuration in webdynpro

what is the difference between component configuration and application configuration in webdynpro?

Hi Rohit,
With the component configuration, you can control the behavior of each individual component within a Web Dynpro application or the user interface of individual views. For each component, several records of configuration data can be created.
Using the application configuration, it is now possible to assign the configuration required in the current application to all the components used.
In short : Component Config belongs to WDP Component and Appl'n Config. belongs to WDP Appl'n.
Check this document for more information.
Web Dynpro for ABAP - Component and Application Configuration
Thanks
KH

How to call derived class to base class

Hello everybody,
I create a GUi application in java swing. Now i want to navigate between the screen but the timing between the screen is very slow bcoz i imported the class from package to another package. Now i want to extends one package to another package to reduce the navigation time but it saying error bcoz i cant able to call my derived class to base class. if anyone know the answer for this please answer this immediately.
If any other method is there to optimise the navigation time please tell me
by
(kamal)

Sorry, I've got major difficulties understanding your query:
I create a GUi application in java
ication in java swing. ok
Now i want to navigate between
the screenwhat? switch screens? display a different dialog?
but the timing between the screen is very
slowtiming? do you mean the time it takes to display a different dialog?
bcoz i imported the class from package to
another package.how did you come to the conclusion that that is the reason for the slowness? Did you do any profiling or is this just guess-work?

How to call a method of a base class if the base class is abstract...

This is my sample code>>>>
abstract class b {
     public void display() {
          System.out.println("I am in Base Class");
class test extends b {
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          test obj = new test();
          obj.display();
     public void display() {
          System.out.println("I am in Derived Class");
I want to call base class version of display with derived class object.........is it possible....

* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
* headdesk *
Enough with the friggin' zombie threads already!

ADF BC Base Classes Configuration by Application possible ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for