ADF FACES EA16 Why survey demo don't use jsp:include for common part

Is it a reason why the surveyPage1, surveyPage2 and others don't use jsp:include to load dynamically the actions, menuglobal and location facet ?
These facet's contains the same adf components with same properties !
Why not use a subview containing these flow management component and include this subview in the panelpage with the jsp:include ?
I'm testing this approach but i'm not able to render these components ... may be i'm completely wrong ? I didn't find any example in the demo that demonstrate how to include subview in an adf document or panelpage.
Help will be appreciate a lot !!!

so what exactly is the problem here?
what is not working?

Similar Messages

  • HT201493 why the app don't use coordinate as alternative to addresses?

    why the app don't use coordinate as alternative to addresses. because the maps in the most area outside USA are very poor.

    There is an iPhone YouTube app in the App Store. Until Google develops an app for the iPad, you can use the mobile site or the iPhone app.

  • HT201250 Why do i have to use the password for time capsule every time i start my computer

    Why do I have to use thr password for time capsuel every time I start my imac?

    With hindsight, the previous response I got from Apple was just a way of shelving the problem.
    Having just had to reset my password after another 3 months, I contacted Apple again, and it happened that the senior advisor whom the phone agent consulted had had exactly the same problem as me, and had found that iTunes could fix it.  However when I spoke to iTunes they told me I needed to speak to Apple ID account security.  The Apple ID account security representative spoke to a senior adviser, then told me that it would be fixed after I reset my password.  However I am not convinced that anything was actually done, so I may be back here in another 3 months ...
    To modify Roger's advice, the solution I was given is: go to https://expresslane.apple.com ; select 'All Products and Services' in the first column, 'iTunes' in the second column, 'iTunes Store' in the third column, then "Account Management" and "Apple ID account security", then "Talk to Apple support now". A complication is that the "Talk to Apple support now" option only appears when UK English is selected.  So you either need to select UK at the top, or find another way of making phone contact (the email link just went back to the person in iTunes)!

  • Why can I no longer use an image for my signature on forms?  The only option I have now is "use a certificate".  It was never like this until today.

    Why can I no longer use an image for my signature on forms?  The only option I have now is "use a certificate".  It was never like this until today.

    Hi,
    I had never heard of someone using the iPhone Number as the ID in the iMessages account in the Mac version.
    i.e without adding an Apple ID
    iMessages does allow iPhone numbers and mine lists mine.
    I would try this.
    Sign Out of the iMessages account and Quit Messages
    On the iPhone in Settings > Messages remove the Apple ID
    Set the iPhone to Airplane mode for a few minutes (to break with the  Server)
    On starting the phone up again check the iPhone Number  is ticked for iMessages.
    If it is add the Apple ID
    On the Mac restart Messages
    Add the Apple ID
    At this point you should get a pop up or two saying the iPhone is using the Number and Apple ID.
    Accept these and they get added to the Receive At list and Send From drop down.
    9:41 pm      Monday; October 28, 2013
      iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Mavericks 10.9)
     G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
     MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
     Mac OS X (10.6.8),
     Couple of iPhones and an iPad

  • HT4628 My iMac loses its connection with my home wi-fi network when it goes into "idle" mode.  That is, if I don't use the Mac for a few minutes, it goes to idle, kind of like sleep. The wi-fi connection disappears and the clock upper right stops working.

    I think it's a Lion problem.  I had this problem with an old Dell True Mobile wireless router, and hoped it would go away with a new Airport Express router.  Same problem.  I checked online and saw a lot of message boards featuring questions from people that suffered the interruption of their wi-fi connection, some with Macbooks others with iMacs like me.  The problem happens when I don't use the computer for a few minutes. It goes into the Idle mode, kind of like sleep.  The connection is severed and the time clock upper right stops.  It's weird.  There was supposedly an Apple update that addressed this issue, so at the Genius bar two days ago I updated to 10.7.3, downloaded and installed the update. Didn't work.  Is it Lion? Is it a wireless card issue?  Very frustrating.  I subitted a genius bar work authorization with another Apple Genius Bar support tech the next day. He ran some tests. Cryptically said he knew that Apple knew about this and was working on a solution but couldn't tell me what it was. Submitted my info and said I'd be contacted by an Apple tech within 48 hours and provided with a link to another download of another update that should "fix" the problem.  I don't know what to do.

    I FINALLY SOLVED THIS ISSUE!!!!
    New routers have "mixed" modes for your network; this means that it will automatically choose the best option between wireless-B, wireless-G and wireless-N network modes. I used to experience this issue using the 2.4 GHz. mixed mode wireless network.
    Thankfully, my router can create 2 networks: a 2.4 GHz. network and a 5 GHz. network.
    When I randomly changed this value to "use only wireless-B and wireless-G" trying to fix an issue with a wi-fi expander, the iMac wi-fi  issue dissapeared! I tried it with wireless-N only, but it didn't work.
    So, finally, I have a 2.4 GHz network with only wireless-B and wireless-G modes which works PERFECT with the iMac, and a 5 GHz. network with a mixed* wireless mode for everything else mode.
    *PD: by "mixed" mode it means that the router will automatically choose between B, G and N network modes as it fits better.

  • I own CS 5Premium. Reading the FAQs, it seems I am eligible to upgrade to CS 6 but I can't find the upgrade to purchase and download. I can't upgrade to CC because $49 per month is too much for me -- I don't use this product for work. The $29 offer seems

    I own CS 5 Design Premium. Reading the FAQs, it seems I am eligible to upgrade to CS 6 but I can't find the upgrade to purchase and download. I can't upgrade to CC because $49 per month is too much for me -- I don't use this product for work. The $29 offer seems reasonable but $49 is way too much. I don't need the majority of the programs included in CC, but subscribing to just three of them will cost way more. Really not sure what to do here :-(

    Thanks Ned. I did find this page, however it isn't an upgrade. I have been purchasing Adobe products for years so that I could just pay the upgrade price for current products. With the current system, I would be paying much more than I would for an upgrade. For example, I have been using my version of CS for at least three years. The upgrade cost me $750 so that comes out to around $21 per month. I guess I have no options as far as upgrading except for paying for the overpriced CC. Oh well, time to start looking for alternatives. It was just so convenient to have the same programs at home that I use at work.

  • Why more people don't use iWork Revealed

    I just upgraded to Lion and am faced with upgraded a number of my computer apps. I have used Office for eons but have Pages and Numbers on my iPhone and iPad but have NEVER thought of iWork with any seriousness. Until today.
    In ready about Lion and Mountain Lion (around the corner), I see that IF you have iWork your Pages and Numbers docs can sync seamlessly with your Pages and Numbers apps on your iDevices. Hmmm. I thought. And Office 2011 is $150 for the Home Student version and iWork is $79.  Hmmm...
    So I went to <apple.com> and the Store and clicked "Mac Software" only to see this:
    And as I scrolled down the page, I can't find iWork anywhere!
    It seems it is only listed under "Apple Software"
    Is is not "Mac Software?"
    And why would Apple willingly promote Office over iWork? Why put Office in the middle of the top row of apps between Adobe and Filemaker? And as already said, not even list iWork in the Mac Software section at all?
    All of a sudden, my enthusiasm for iWork was diminished as I started to wonder: if Apple doesn't have the faith to promote iWorks over Office, maybe iWorks isn't as good as Office and I should heed this and just stick with what I've used for years and not stray.
    How could one of the best marketing companies in the world, Apple, not promote it's own same featured software over it's competitor's unless it wasn't as good and Apple didn't want to over state it's software's value?
    Apple to my observation, and I say this as a BIG fan wanting the best for Apple, is treating iWork as an adobpted child they don't love much.
    Because iWorks syncs with Apple devices and seems to have great functions, it would seem that Apple marketing should hike to the mountain top and trumpet it's existence as loud as possible! But Apple is not. iWork is a best kept secret. Why? I don't have the foggiest. But Apple needs to wake up, unless it's a political thing and Apple has told Bill it wouldn't step on his shoes and over promote iWork.
    I would almost bet my last dime, there's some politics going on here. Why else would Apple hold back? They don't on anything else. Strange indeed.
    I'm still considering buying iWork instead of Office 2011. But the wind has diminished in my sails thanks to Apple's lack of enthusiasm.
    Fix this Apple.

    Your points are well taken Tom. I realize that if I abandon Office, since the world seems to turn on Office, that I would have to save my work as both an iWork doc and then an Office doc if I need to send it to someone that needs to edit it. Otherwise, I would send it as a PDF which is still double work to some extent.
    But regarding preaching to the converted, I don't know. I think there are a lot of folks that don't know about iWorks and being that Apple keeps it a bit of a secret, this was the reason I created this thread.
    But I absolutely copied the text and then sent it to the Feedback link found in the bottom right of each page instead "Contact Us" as I always do when I have a point I want to convey to Apple.
    But I'm really considering going with iWork over Office since iWork can save as Office docs. And with that being so, being able to sync iWork docs to my iPhone and iPad seems kind of new and cool. Granted I'm not about to do any heavy work on an iWork doc via my iPhone. But I could read one from my iPhone. And I "could" actually edit an iWork doc on my iPad even though virtual keyboards are a tad tough to work on versus a physical keyboard.

  • I don't use Photoshop - looking for software with similar functionality to Photoshop's Pixelbender / Oil Painting.  Any suggestions?

    I don't use Photoshop, I'm an Aperture guy.
    I'm looking for software with similar functionality to Photoshop's Pixelbender / Oil Painting. 
    I'm especially interested in the bending of the pixels, along the lines of impressionist paintings - think van Gogh.
    Any suggestions?

    If you are interested in computer simulated drawing and painting effects, have a look at the "ToonIt!" plug-in for Aperture. This will do some of the basic work for you, but you will have to do quite a lot of editing afterwards, to turn the image into a piece of art.
    It might be easier, to do most of the drwing and painting yourself in the first place - ArtRage Deluxe is very versatile, if you have a large trackpad and pen.
    For example: Applying a light ToonIt! effect "Impressionist2": The diagonal
    cross-pattern is due to "Demo" mode - I have not yet bought the plug-in - it is rather expensive:
    The original:

  • Why JMS if we can use JAVA classes for the same

    if we can communicate using the java classes which are protable and platform independent why do we have to use JMS for that. what is so specific about it and what is the benefit that makes it outstanding

    James/Steve,
    I feel that some of your points are misleading. The original authors point was a comparison against JMS and other means of achieving similar functionality with Java. Regarding your combined points:
    2) Scalability is something that can be achieved regardless of whether JMS is used. Clustering has nothing to do with JMS, each vendors clustering implementation is entirely proprietary.
    4) Aside from the inclusion of JNDI the JMS specification offers nothing for management. You only need to look through this forum at the amount of times a question like �how do I make a topic programmatically?� has been asked. All good JMS vendors offer management API�s and tools but all are vendor specific implementations.
    10) There is no JMS standard for load balancing. The generic round robin features of a JMS queue falls a long way short of true �load balancing�. Any vendor (ourselves included) that offers load balancing does so in an entirely proprietary manner.
    11) Again�JMS provides no standards for clustering of running one or more server. This is entirely down to implementation and functionality is vendor specific.
    12) Dead Message/Letter Queues are not defined in JMS
    14) What does serialization have to do with the original point? How one chooses to serialize their content ( XML, Object Serialization, Externalizable etc..) is equally applicable to both bespoke Java coding and JMS implementations.
    To birs1982:
    JMS is merely a collection of interfaces that define how one might read and write to a topic or queue. Vendors (both open source and commercial) recognize that these interfaces alone are not enough to offer an entire middleware messaging solution and complete the offering with sophisticated management, resilience, clustering, security and other value added features. These value added features require considerable effort to get right as do things like scalability and performance.
    Given JMS like messaging is almost commodity now (just look at the amount of JMS vendors that have leaped into the ESB space) and a common (perhaps essential) infrastructure component why produce it yourself? Surely your time is better spent serving your clients and business lines rather that writing what amounts to plumbing. All the hard work has been done and the price for this hard work (depending on your requirements) is anything from free to many thousands of pounds.
    Regards,
    Paul Brant
    my-Channels - Technologies working together
    http://www.my-channels.com/

  • Why is the Star Transformation using two indexes for the same dimension?

    Hi,
    Recently, I have made an investigation about the Star Transformation feature. I have found a strange test case, which plays an important role in my strategy for our overall DWH architecture. Here it is:
    The Strategy:
    I would like to have the classical Star Transformation approach (single column Bitmap Indexes for each dimension foreign key column in the fact table), together with additional Bitmap Join Indexes for some of the dimension attributes, which would benefit from the materialization of the join (bitmap merge operation will be skipped/optimized).
    The query:
    select dp.brand, ds. region_name, dc.region_name
         , count(*), sum(f.extended_price)
      from fact_line_item  f
         , dim_part       dp
         , dim_supplier   ds
         , dim_customer   dc
    where dp.mfgr        = 10                 -- dimension selectivity = 1/10 --> acttual/fact selectivity = 6/10
       and f.part_dk      = dp.dk
       and ds.region_name = 'REGION #1' -- dimension selectivity = 1/9
       and f.supplier_dk  = ds.dk
       and dc.region_name = 'REGION #1' -- dimension selectivity = 1/11
       and f.customer_dk  = dc.dk
    group by dp.brand, ds. region_name, dc.region_name
    The actual plan:
    | Id  | Operation                              | Name                        | Starts | E-Rows | Cost (%CPU)| A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads  |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                             |      1 |        |  3247 (100)|      1 |00:01:42.05 |     264K|    220K|
    |   1 |  HASH GROUP BY                         |                             |      1 |      2 |  3247   (1)|      1 |00:01:42.05 |     264K|    220K|
    |*  2 |   HASH JOIN                            |                             |      1 |  33242 |  3037   (1)|    217K|00:01:29.67 |     264K|    220K|
    |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                   | DIM_SUPPLIER                |      1 |   1112 |   102   (0)|   1112 |00:00:00.01 |     316 |      4 |
    |*  4 |    HASH JOIN                           |                             |      1 |  33245 |  2934   (1)|    217K|00:01:29.10 |     264K|    220K|
    |*  5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL                  | DIM_CUSTOMER                |      1 |    910 |   102   (0)|    910 |00:00:00.08 |     316 |      8 |
    |*  6 |     HASH JOIN                          |                             |      1 |  33248 |  2831   (1)|    217K|00:01:28.57 |     264K|    220K|
    |*  7 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | DIM_PART                    |      1 |     10 |     3   (0)|     10 |00:00:00.01 |       6 |      0 |
    |   8 |      PARTITION RANGE ALL               |                             |      1 |  36211 |  2827   (1)|    217K|00:01:28.01 |     264K|    220K|
    |   9 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| FACT_LINE_ITEM              |      6 |  36211 |  2827   (1)|    217K|00:01:33.85 |     264K|    220K|
    |  10 |        BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS     |                             |      6 |        |            |    217K|00:00:07.09 |   46980 |   3292 |
    |  11 |         BITMAP AND                     |                             |      6 |        |            |     69 |00:00:08.33 |   46980 |   3292 |
    |  12 |          BITMAP MERGE                  |                             |      6 |        |            |    193 |00:00:02.09 |    2408 |   1795 |
    |  13 |           BITMAP KEY ITERATION         |                             |      6 |        |            |   4330 |00:00:04.66 |    2408 |   1795 |
    |  14 |            BUFFER SORT                 |                             |      6 |        |            |     60 |00:00:00.01 |       6 |      0 |
    |* 15 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIM_PART                    |      1 |     10 |     3   (0)|     10 |00:00:00.01 |       6 |      0 |
    |* 16 |            BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN     | FACT_LI__P_PART_DIM_KEY_BIX |     60 |        |            |   4330 |00:00:02.11 |    2402 |   1795 |
    |* 17 |          BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE     | FACT_LI__P_PART_MFGR_BJX    |      6 |        |            |   1747 |00:00:06.65 |     890 |    888 |
    |  18 |          BITMAP MERGE                  |                             |      6 |        |            |    169 |00:00:02.78 |   16695 |    237 |
    |  19 |           BITMAP KEY ITERATION         |                             |      6 |        |            |   5460 |00:00:01.56 |   16695 |    237 |
    |  20 |            BUFFER SORT                 |                             |      6 |        |            |   5460 |00:00:00.02 |     316 |      0 |
    |* 21 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIM_CUSTOMER                |      1 |    910 |   102   (0)|    910 |00:00:00.01 |     316 |      0 |
    |* 22 |            BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN     | FACT_LI__P_CUST_DIM_KEY_BIX |   5460 |        |            |   5460 |00:00:02.07 |   16379 |    237 |
    |  23 |          BITMAP MERGE                  |                             |      6 |        |            |    170 |00:00:03.65 |   26987 |    372 |
    |  24 |           BITMAP KEY ITERATION         |                             |      6 |        |            |   6672 |00:00:02.23 |   26987 |    372 |
    |  25 |            BUFFER SORT                 |                             |      6 |        |            |   6672 |00:00:00.01 |     316 |      0 |
    |* 26 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIM_SUPPLIER                |      1 |   1112 |   102   (0)|   1112 |00:00:00.01 |     316 |      0 |
    |* 27 |            BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN     | FACT_LI__S_SUPP_DIM_KEY_BIX |   6672 |        |            |   6672 |00:00:02.74 |   26671 |    372 |
    The Question:
    Why is the Star Transformation using both indexes FACT_LI__P_PART_DIM_KEY_BIX and FACT_LI__P_PART_MFGR_BJX for the same dimension criteria (dp.mfgr = 10)?? The introduction of the additional Bitmap Join Index actually make Oracle to do the work twice !!!
    Anybody, any idea ?!?

    Dom, here it is the plan with the predicates:
    | Id  | Operation                              | Name                        | Starts | E-Rows | Cost (%CPU)| A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads  |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                             |      1 |        |  3638 (100)|      1 |00:06:41.17 |     445K|    236K|
    |   1 |  HASH GROUP BY                         |                             |      1 |      2 |  3638   (1)|      1 |00:06:41.17 |     445K|    236K|
    |*  2 |   HASH JOIN                            |                             |      1 |  33242 |  3429   (1)|    217K|00:08:18.02 |     445K|    236K|
    |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                   | DIM_SUPPLIER                |      1 |   1112 |   102   (0)|   1112 |00:00:00.03 |     319 |    313 |
    |*  4 |    HASH JOIN                           |                             |      1 |  33245 |  3326   (1)|    217K|00:08:17.47 |     445K|    236K|
    |*  5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL                  | DIM_CUSTOMER                |      1 |    910 |   102   (0)|    910 |00:00:00.01 |     319 |    313 |
    |*  6 |     HASH JOIN                          |                             |      1 |  33248 |  3223   (1)|    217K|00:08:16.63 |     445K|    236K|
    |*  7 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | DIM_PART                    |      1 |     10 |     3   (0)|     10 |00:00:00.01 |       6 |      0 |
    |   8 |      PARTITION RANGE ALL               |                             |      1 |  36211 |  3219   (1)|    217K|00:08:16.30 |     445K|    236K|
    |   9 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| FACT_LINE_ITEM              |      6 |  36211 |  3219   (1)|    217K|00:08:40.89 |     445K|    236K|
    |  10 |        BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS     |                             |      6 |        |            |    217K|00:00:32.00 |   46919 |  19331 |
    |  11 |         BITMAP AND                     |                             |      6 |        |            |     69 |00:00:34.50 |   46919 |  19331 |
    |  12 |          BITMAP MERGE                  |                             |      6 |        |            |    193 |00:00:00.58 |    2353 |      1 |
    |  13 |           BITMAP KEY ITERATION         |                             |      6 |        |            |   4330 |00:00:00.10 |    2353 |      1 |
    |  14 |            BUFFER SORT                 |                             |      6 |        |            |     60 |00:00:00.01 |       6 |      0 |
    |* 15 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIM_PART                    |      1 |     10 |     3   (0)|     10 |00:00:00.01 |       6 |      0 |
    |* 16 |            BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN     | FACT_LI__P_PART_DIM_KEY_BIX |     60 |        |            |   4330 |00:00:00.07 |    2347 |      1 |
    |* 17 |          BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE     | FACT_LI__P_PART_MFGR_BJX    |      6 |        |            |   1747 |00:01:23.64 |     882 |    565 |
    |  18 |          BITMAP MERGE                  |                             |      6 |        |            |    169 |00:00:09.14 |   16697 |   7628 |
    |  19 |           BITMAP KEY ITERATION         |                             |      6 |        |            |   5460 |00:00:02.19 |   16697 |   7628 |
    |  20 |            BUFFER SORT                 |                             |      6 |        |            |   5460 |00:00:00.01 |     316 |      0 |
    |* 21 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIM_CUSTOMER                |      1 |    910 |   102   (0)|    910 |00:00:00.01 |     316 |      0 |
    |* 22 |            BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN     | FACT_LI__P_CUST_DIM_KEY_BIX |   5460 |        |            |   5460 |00:00:08.78 |   16381 |   7628 |
    |  23 |          BITMAP MERGE                  |                             |      6 |        |            |    170 |00:00:21.46 |   26987 |  11137 |
    |  24 |           BITMAP KEY ITERATION         |                             |      6 |        |            |   6672 |00:00:10.29 |   26987 |  11137 |
    |  25 |            BUFFER SORT                 |                             |      6 |        |            |   6672 |00:00:00.01 |     316 |      0 |
    |* 26 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL          | DIM_SUPPLIER                |      1 |   1112 |   102   (0)|   1112 |00:00:00.01 |     316 |      0 |
    |* 27 |            BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN     | FACT_LI__S_SUPP_DIM_KEY_BIX |   6672 |        |            |   6672 |00:00:20.94 |   26671 |  11137 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):                                                                                                  
       2 - access("F"."SUPPLIER_DK"="DS"."DK")                                                                                                           
       3 - filter("DS"."REGION_NAME"='REGION #1')                                                                                                        
       4 - access("F"."CUSTOMER_DK"="DC"."DK")                                                                                                           
       5 - filter("DC"."REGION_NAME"='REGION #1')                                                                                                        
       6 - access("F"."PART_DK"="DP"."DK")                                                                                                               
       7 - filter("DP"."MFGR"=10)                                                                                                                        
      15 - filter("DP"."MFGR"=10)                                                                                                                        
      16 - access("F"."PART_DK"="DP"."DK")                                                                                                               
      17 - access("F"."SYS_NC00017$"=10)                                                                                                                 
      21 - filter("DC"."REGION_NAME"='REGION #1')                                                                                                        
      22 - access("F"."CUSTOMER_DK"="DC"."DK")                                                                                                           
      26 - filter("DS"."REGION_NAME"='REGION #1')                                                                                                        
      27 - access("F"."SUPPLIER_DK"="DS"."DK")                                                                                                           
    Note                                                                                                                                                 
       - star transformation used for this statement                                                                                                     

  • Why does people use JSP Tag for their JSP page? (Urgent)

    I don't know what benifit if I am using JSP Tag.
    If anyone knows, pls give me an idea and the advantage of using JSP Tag in JSP Page!
    Thanks in advance!

    You have to read a little about JSP, JSP stands for JavaServer Pages, you can use jsp tags and you can use java code. If you dont want to use jsp tags then you should just write html file, if you just want to use java, then write java class or a servlet.
    The need for jsp arised because people were inserting html code inside a servlet class..a big no no..and a headache. JSP separate model from the view...read a little about MVC-2 model view controller pattern.
    Also read some tutorial on this website...good luck
    K

  • Why this does not works??? (I use jsp: include. to contain two jsp files)

    I have a main.jsp, and in this main.jsp, I have two part, leftButton.jsp and view.jsp, I want to include the leftButton.jsp and view.jsp to main.jsp.
    The code of main.jsp is like follows:
    <%@ page language="java" contentType="text/html" %>
    <html>
    <head>
    <title>JSP include element test</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    <table>
    <tr>
    <td><jsp: include page="leftButton.jsp" flush="true"></jsp: include></td>
                             <td>     <jsp: include page="view.jsp" flush="true"></jsp: include></td>
                        </tr>
         </table>
    </body>
    </html>
    Why the include does not works? by the way, I embeded a flash.swf file in view.jsp.

    Hi Mellon,
    You might be better off using a JSPF segment for leftButton.jsp & view.jsp and the <%@ include file="relativeURL" %>.
    Be careful that the included file does not contain <html>, </html>, <body>, or </body> tags. Because the entire content of the included file is added to the including JSP page, these tags would conflict with the same tags in the including JSP page, causing an error.
    Note: It is conventional to put JSP segements under the WEB-INF/jspf/ folder so the file cannot be accessed directly by a URL
    Note: JSPF files end with .jspf, so your files would be leftButton.jspf and view.jspf.

  • ADF-FACES-EA16: internal server error after migrating process train

    java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: void oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.taglib.core.nav.CoreProcessTrainTag.setVar(java.lang.String)
         at newContract2e_jspx._jspService(newContract.jspx:26)
         [newContract.jspx]
         at com.orionserver[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.0.0) - Developer Preview 3].http.OrionHttpJspPage.service(OrionHttpJspPage.java:60)
    here is the part related to process train
    <f:facet name="location">
    <af:processTrain binding="#{backing_newContract.processTrain1}"
    value="#{newContractPageFlowModel}"
    var="newContractNode">
    <f:facet name="nodeStamp">
    <af:commandMenuItem binding="#{backing_newContract.commandMenuItem1}"
    text="#{newContractNode.label}"
    action="#{newContractNode.outcome}"/>
    </f:facet>
    </af:processTrain>
    </f:facet>
    <f:facet name="actions">
    <af:processChoiceBar binding="#{backing_newContract.processChoiceBar1}"
    value="#{newContractPageFlowModel}"
    var="newContractNode">
    <f:facet name="nodeStamp">
    <af:commandMenuItem binding="#{backing_newContract.commandMenuItem2}"
    text="#{newContractNode.label}"
    action="#{newContractNode.outcome}"/>
    </f:facet>
    </af:processChoiceBar>
    </f:facet>

    Hi Steven,
    Just to let you know, I was able to reproduce this very easily with a simple JHeadstart project.
    - Create ADF Fusion Web app
    - Create connection to HR
    - Add VO, EO, APpModule for Departments table
    - Change AM configuration to use DataSource
    - Enable JHeadstart on ViewController
    - Create new JHeadstart service definition
    - Set JHeadstart custom authentication to Custom
    - Set JHeadstart custom authorisation to Custom
    - Secure all pages
    - Set session timeout in web.xml to 5 minutes
    - Deploy to local weblogic
    - Log on to application then logoff
    - Wait longer than 5 minutes then log back on
    - Redirect message shown which takes you back to login page
    - Login and you will get 500 server error
    This is with zero custom coding - only steps those shown above. Can you please confirm that you can replicate this ?
    Cheers,
    Brent

  • ADF-Faces EA16

    Does CommandLink have any attribute like "blocking" like the most recent version of EA ?

    Here is the snippet where I am having the issue(the first commandLink tag)
    <af:column gridVisible="false" formatType="number">
    <af:panelGroup layout="horizontal">
    <f:facet name="separator">
    <af:outputText value=" | " styleClass="cText" escape="false"/>
    </f:facet>
    <af:commandLink text="#{bundle.attachments_attach}"
    actionListener="#{curItem.activateItem}"
    action="#{portfolioTemplate.addItemAsAttachment}"
                             onclick="this.disabled=true"
                             styleClass="cCommandLink"/>]
    <af:commandLink text="#{bundle.myItems_viewItem}" useDialog="true" partialSubmit="true" action="process:preview_item"
    actionListener="#{curItem.activateItem}" windowWidth="300" windowHeight="300"
    styleClass="cCommandLink"/>
    <af:commandLink text="#{bundle.myItems_copyItem}" useDialog="true" partialSubmit="true" action="process:copy_item"
    actionListener="#{curItem.copyItem}" returnListener="#{dialog.refreshCallingPage}"
    windowHeight="200" windowWidth="200" styleClass="cCommandLink"/>
    </af:panelGroup>
    </af:column>
    this resides in a pop-up. If you hammer that commandLink in IE it calls the method multiple times. Not an issue in Firefox. With or without the onclick in firefox the event is only launched once.

  • Why do I have to use security code for wifi router each time I turn on iPad 3?

    Why do I have to enter wifi security code for my router each time I turn on ipad3?  I have checked all the settings I could but is this a router problem?

    If you're hiding your network SSID and/or using WEP security, I think these can cause this problem.  If you're hiding your SSID, there's really no point in doing that since there are ways people can easily see it if they're looking to do harm anyway.  If you're using WEP security, consider changing to WPA2 which is much more secure than WEP.

Maybe you are looking for