Adjust export image resolution in Keynote4

Hi folks,
Above image is captured on my desktop, in left, that is keynote screen, and right side is export jpeg image(High quality option) from the keynote. And the captured image seems much bad and has not enough rolution to me (image size is 1024x768 for a page).
Still I can`t find resolution adjust option where is. Does anyone know this?
My Keynote version is 6.5.2. Thanks.

(image size is 1024x768 for a page)
The higher the pixel count, the higher the resolution;
1024 is low quality
as a comparison, my Canon 5D III creates 5760x3840 images
therefore change the pixel size: 3000x2000 or 2000x1300
test and see what works for you
change the pixel setting in: Inspector > Document > Document > Slide Size > Custom
When exporting; use TIFF filetype for the best quality export

Similar Messages

Registry Settings for Exporting Image resolution (RDC XI R2)

The following document describes registry settings to control exported image resolution:
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/boc/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/30407084-c51d-2b10-1f81-813488350e6f?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/boc/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/30407084-c51d-2b10-1f81-813488350e6f?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
However, that document is old.
Where can we find instructions for XI R2 RDC applications?

There are several informal & conflicting suggestions that one can find via internet searches. For example:
Add the following registry entries under HKEY_CURRENT_USER
-> Software -> Seagate Software -> Crystal Reports Designer Component -> Export
BitMapMagnifDenominator = 4 (DWord)
BitMapMagnifNumerator = 5 (DWord)
I'm looking for a definitive document/instruction from SAP.
One of my customers just reported that the following settings work:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER
-> Software -> Business Objects -> Suite 11.5 -> Crystal Reports Designer Component -> Export
BitMapMagnifDenominator = 1 (DWord)
BitMapMagnifNumerator = 4 (DWord)
Thanks,
- Ido
Edited by: Ido Millet on Jul 8, 2011 11:14 AM

Lightroom to Revel Export: image resolution

Anyone know how to change the upload resolution into Revel from Lightroom? It currently is 240dpi I need 300dpi. I can change it when I upload/export into my hard drive but no option into Revel.

Is it not as simple as changing the resolution in the export settings? e.g.
I don't use Revel, so please forgive if my reply reveals my ignorance...

Exported Raw Conversion Image Resolution and Assigning a Color Profile, etc

In Aperture 1.1, although I set the exported Raw conversion image resolution to 300 dpi in the preferences, it continues to come out at 72 dpi which is something of an inconvenience. Also, is it possible to assign a color profile to the "exported version" so that it is congruent to my PS CS2 color workspace (if that is what its called). Is this program capable of carrying out a conversion as a background operation? Finally, can the layout windows be configured so that they remember how they have been used in the past? Thanks.

Iatrogenic huh! Cool!
Anyway, I'm not real clear on what it is you are trying to accomplish. Despite your obvious vocabulary skills, there seems to be some disconnect relative to what you are trying to accomplish. You are right that "exporting a version" in Aperture is roughly equivalent to what happens in ACR when you "Open" a RAW image into Photoshop. In both cases you have, hopefully, already done the adjusting of parameters you want prior to "exporting", or "opening". When you "open" or "export" you wind up with an "image" composed of pixels, whereas in the RAW adjustment phase you are just working with a temporary thumbnail and a set of mathematical instructions. Big difference, I suppose is that when you "open" and image from ACR into CS2, the resulting image is truly just pixels and has not had a "file type" applied to the file yet, until you "save" it, while in Aperture, if you "export" a file to CS2, or to the desktop, you end up with the file type already applied. Presuming you "export" a 16 bit TIFF or PSD, there is no operational difference.
I could be wrong, but with the new Bayer Demosaicing algorithms in Aperture 1.1, and the Camera RAW adjustments, you should be able to come up with an adjusted image that is VERY close if not identical to one done in ACR, with the possible exception of lens abberation adjustment. I was very critical of the RAW adjustments in 1.0.1, but I am very happy with the capabilites in 1.1. That said, I think there is still some room for improvement in user friendliness of some of the adjustments such as Levels.

Bridge Exports Changes Resolution from 300 to 72 dpi, resizing my image

I like to use Bridge (CS5) to export my photographs for printing, and frequently I will use the Export feature to resize the images (e.g., 5x7 vs full size), but every time I export it recharacterizes the images as 72 dpi, vs the 300 dpi I prefer.
Consistent with some of the previous postings (~2 yrs ago) I have seen on this topic the exported images are now "sized" much bigger (29"x20" for what should have been ~5"x7"), and hence expectantly I haven't lost any resolution, but it's aggrevating to have the dpi changed.
Can anyone tell me how to export without having the dpi changed?
And while I'm at it, can anyone confirm that I'm not loosing image resolution?
Thanks so much!!

Can anyone tell me how to export without having the dpi changed?
Can't find any other settings to change and just having tested it I can confirm that it sets ppi (it is pixels per inch -ppi- for a digital file which is made from pixels and dots per inch -dpi- from the ink dots of a print ) to 72.
And while I'm at it, can anyone confirm that I'm not loosing image resolution?
You already stated yourself that you did not loose pixels, therefor the size of the files stays the same. It is just a mater of figures. 300 ppi means a larger concentration per inch and 72 pixels per inch means a smaller concentration of pixels per inch. Given the same amount of pixels for both settings this means a smaller image dimension for 300 ppi and a larger image dimension for the 72 ppi.
300 ppi is some 'magic' number from printed press, but it really depends on the need of the job related printing machine. If you have a small image and need to look closely it should have a larger concentration per inch to reflect its sharpness.
However theoretically you would almost have the same visible quality when printed on 72 at billboard sizes. That's because you always have a large distance between your eyes and the bill board. If you look closely you will see the dots (because the billboard is a product of ink dots…) but of course it is not meant to study at that close range.
The same is for judging sharpness on your computer. Ideally you do so at 100 % for correct judgement at real size pixels. But in reality there will be almost no situation you will study a print at that same distance
Any thoughts on why these would be different? And am I fretting over things unncessarily?
Only guesses, the use a different algorithm or calculation scheme, in my case I tried a Canon Raw (converted to DNG) without any ACR settings then the basics applied and found that Bridge export jpeg 11 creates larger files then using PS.
But there are some other concerns I have and that certainly would make me fretting in use of export module:
First of all I almost never use it, merely in this cases for testing, because using the menu tools give a shortcut to Photoshop / Batch and inhere I have created several dedicated resizing and resaving actions that also places the files in preset folders.
But with this small test I found out that
a: it changes ppi to 72 ppi, not a very big deal but I did not asked for it nor did I wanted it.
b: it converts my Adobe RGB color space to sRGB and I certainly did not want that without my explicit wish for this conversion, so this is more then a bit worrying to my concern.
c: it seems to apply a sharpness that I certainly did not want to happen without my knowledge, and this rules the use of the export module out completely.
Since I only tried a DNG file without settings or retouch/developing in Photoshop the jpeg generated by PS was not very sharp. This makes sense to me because I have set my basic ACR to apply sharpening only to preview. There are a lot of different sharpening theories around but I use one in PS itself. So I was a bit shocked to learn that the export module did all those for me unwanted and not adjustable settings putting me completely out of control…
So if you want to have full control about things happening under the hood yourself just start creating actions in PS, it is very easy to record an action and even more easier to play it. Instead of every time dragging files to export module and always recheck the image options (it seems to reset itself always to jpeg quality 8 on my system) only select the files you want to resize and choose menu tool / Photoshop Batch and select the wanted action. hit OK and your almost done, PS does the rest.
The great thing of the latest PS CS6 action pallet is the extension with a so called 'insert conditional' that let's you create an 'if - then else' action for both landscape and portrait resizing actions so you don't need the 'constrain to fit' or 'fit image' option. Just once create an action for both resizing dimensions and then create a new action with insert conditional. choose If image is landscape play action…. / else play action….
It is really a very productive way. I have a lot of actions (organized in sets for better overview) and even one that creates 4 different sizes in 4 different folders using 1 go in Bridge

How to maintain high resolution of exported images

I am working with iphoto 5.0.4. When trying to export (share>export) an image as a 'Full Size' image (3264 x 2448 4.5 MB) to the desktop it appears at that size with 300 dpi resolution. However if I export the same file as 'Scale image as no larger than:' the resolution remains 300 dpi but the size is reduced to 2.4 MB while the dimensions remain the same. And finally if any cropping is performed or if I resize the dimensions of the image, the exported image will reflect the altered size but also the dpi is reduced to 72. What gives? Does that mean that the printed version will only print at 72 dpi? How can I create a smaller size image and still maintain 300 dpi resolution? I thank you in advance for your help.
iMac Mac OS X (10.4.5) iphoto 5.0

My first thought would be to remove the "Scale all objects ... " vi property. I have been using LabVIEW for 10+ years, and I always found that function to work very poorly. I never use it. At least you could try removing that setting and see if your problem goes away.

What resolution does Pages export Images to EPUB?

I was wondering what resolution Pages09 Exports images to EPUB (which are then readable in iBooks2?)
In other programs from Adobe and others you can control the Image conversion Resolution before you Click "Export" to EPUB?

I agree it isn't very helpful...but that is all I have been told. Still trying to fiond out what the projector resolution is.
I am using a fit within...but everything I am reading about projectors tells me I should be able to use higher resolution for a projector. This is more of a Foto Magico question as it pertains to images coming from Aperture.
It is less the image resolution and more the slideshow settings I am trying to figure out. Maybe this is not the right place to post... Thanks Frank.

Photos Export Options to Change Image Resolution

iPhoto used to let you export photos and change the resolution (setting pixel size, for example). This is a function I used a lot to help my wife who is an artist who needs to export images to post on eBay with the optimum image size.
I signed up for the Photos Beta to make sure this function was going to be available. My recollection is that the first Beta version did have this feature in Photos. I didn't check the later betas, but now that the production V1.0 is out, I discovered that this feature is not available.
Does anyone remember seeing this feature in the original beta software? I was pretty sure it was present, but I might be mistaken. It seems strange to remove features in the beta process.
Now I have to use Lightroom to do this. LR handles this function easily, but it is a lot more complicated.
David

I am still seeing the option to change the resolution in the "File > Export > Version" panel.
Have you searched all options, David? I have to click the little disclosure arrow tin the Export panel to get to the "custom" option.

What resolution to export images for projection?

I am trying to figure out what to set the tage parmaeters in Foto Magico for a slideshow to be projected. The only information I have about the projector is that "images are generally best at 1050 on thier longest side." Not very helpful. I have multiple dimensions - 4:3, square, etc. Just trying to figure out what to set the stage to so I can create an export parameter fpr my images at 1050 on longest side still have some black around. The only info I can find is HD resolution, which I don't want as it seems to be cropping my 4:3 images. Any thoughts or FM users?
thanks
Nancie

I agree it isn't very helpful...but that is all I have been told. Still trying to fiond out what the projector resolution is.
I am using a fit within...but everything I am reading about projectors tells me I should be able to use higher resolution for a projector. This is more of a Foto Magico question as it pertains to images coming from Aperture.
It is less the image resolution and more the slideshow settings I am trying to figure out. Maybe this is not the right place to post... Thanks Frank.

Exporting Images and Clipping Paths

I ran into a problem exporting images the was previously reported by Ruvan Fernando on Jan 25, 2006, but nobody had responded, so I'm trying again...
I'm using the SDK to open images and then save them back out with different colorspaces, resolution, etc. When I have an image that has a clipping path in it, when it's saved, the clipping path is missing.
I am copying all the source image attributes to the destination image attributes.
Any help would be appreciated.

I tried dragging it, and it gave the original version.
At Share there are; Print, Email, Desktop, HomePage, .Mac Slides, Order prints, Send to iDVD, Burn Disk, Export
I tried Desktop and it put the current image do my wallpaper.

Can I use Bridge to export image data into a .txt file?

I have a folder of images and I would like to export the File Name, Resolution, Dimensions and Color Mode for each file into one text file. Can I use Bridge to export image data into a .txt file?

Hello
You may try the following AppleScript script. It will ask you to choose a root folder where to start searching for *.map files and then create a CSV file named "out.csv" on desktop which you may import to Excel.
set f to (choose folder with prompt "Choose the root folder to start searching")'s POSIX path
if f ends with "/" then set f to f's text 1 thru -2
do shell script "/usr/bin/perl -CSDA -w <<'EOF' - " & f's quoted form & " > ~/Desktop/out.csv
use strict;
use open IN => ':crlf';
chdir $ARGV[0] or die qq($!);
local $/ = qq(\\0);
my @ff = map {chomp; $_} qx(find . -type f -iname '*.map' -print0);
local $/ = qq(\\n);
#     CSV spec
#     - record separator is CRLF
#     - field separator is comma
#     - every field is quoted
#     - text encoding is UTF-8
local $\\ = qq(\\015\\012);    # CRLF
local $, = qq(,);            # COMMA
# print column header row
my @dd = ('column 1', 'column 2', 'column 3', 'column 4', 'column 5', 'column 6');
print map { s/\"/\"\"/og; qq(\").$_.qq(\"); } @dd;
# print data row per each file
while (@ff) {
    my $f = shift @ff;    # file path
    if ( ! open(IN, '<', $f) ) {
        warn qq(Failed to open $f: $!);
        next;
    $f =~ s%^.*/%%og;    # file name
    @dd = ('', $f, '', '', '', '');
    while (<IN>) {
        chomp;
        $dd[0] = \"$2/$1/$3\" if m%Link Time\\s+=\\s+([0-9]{2})/([0-9]{2})/([0-9]{4})%o;
        ($dd[2] = $1) =~ s/ //g if m/([0-9 ]+)\\s+bytes of CODE\\s/o;
        ($dd[3] = $1) =~ s/ //g if m/([0-9 ]+)\\s+bytes of DATA\\s/o;
        ($dd[4] = $1) =~ s/ //g if m/([0-9 ]+)\\s+bytes of XDATA\\s/o;
        ($dd[5] = $1) =~ s/ //g if m/([0-9 ]+)\\s+bytes of FARCODE\\s/o;
        last unless grep { /^$/ } @dd;
    close IN;
    print map { s/\"/\"\"/og; qq(\").$_.qq(\"); } @dd;
EOF
Hope this may help,
H

Continuous tone image resolution lower than specified

The following message was posted in the incorrect forum; no legitimate solution to the problem was ever posted. I am re-posting it, as this is the same exact problem I am having, right down to the OS and version of Acrobat. Could someone please explain to me what this means and whether or not I should be concerned about it? I will also get two different kinds of results... one is a single number effective ppi on this error, such as 199, (which results in 200ppi if run through PitStop), and a two-number effective ppi, which we haven't been able to decipher, such as 501.357/179.55ppi (which should be a hi-resolution image).
Help?
Amy Carolyn Watson
>
>
>Nikola Viereckel - 09:45pm Dec 9, 2007 Pacific
>
>Hi - I have recently discovered the above error message when I
>check my distilled press quality pdf in preflight. I am using
>a PC and Version 7.0 of distiller and acrobat. The images are
>300dpi and are in my documents at 100% or lower, so there should
>be no resolution issues. The pdf itself looks fine, but the
>preflight does not. I find if I export out of InDesign (CS2)
>then I do not get the same error message, but this is not my
>preferred way to create pdfs for print.
>
>Any ideas? I the only thoughts I have had is to reinstall
>the program. Thanking you in advance for your help.
>Cheers
>Nikola

> All text should export as vector, since it's all on a layer above any kind of image.
Is there any transparency in the text, though? If you float text over
an image with transparency, it MUST be exported as an image. If it is
floated over vector art with transparency, it MIGHT.
It's easy to assume that just because something is on top, it doesn't
ever need to be flattened. This is not in fact true.
>
>I am a little concerned: is this a flaw in the Acrobat Program?
You mean in its preflight? Unlikely, it isn't rocket science to
calculate ppi, so the numbers are probably right.
>
>Where is this "Continuous tone image resolution" turned on/off? Why is it important?
That's probably a reference to Distiller settings. I think we've
established that you aren't using Distiller.
>
>Is InDesignCS2 flattening to low transparency settings, even though my settings dictate high?
You'd probably need to ask in the InDesign forum. But bear in mind
that the flattener is free to use lower resolution if it thinks that
is all that is needed for particular effects.
Maybe you could reopen the PDF in Illustrator, and use that to select
the images in the flattened page. Might illuminate what is going on.
Aandi Inston

Check image resolution and color

Please let me know whether it is possible to get the image resolution and color used in a eps file.
regards,
Sashi

You can specify the resolution for exporting, for document etc but resolution of the raster objects can not be retrieved.
Color space of the raster object can be retrieved using the rasterItems : colorants or imageColorSpace properties

Possible Bug in ID5.5 When Exporting Images to ePub

Just wanted to relate my experience with exporting images to ePub in InDesign CS5.5. I've already spent the better part of two weeks trying to find a resolution for the problem with Adobe's customer service techs in India. Nice guys, but so far not of much help.
Here's the problem. when exporting ID documents to ePub, and you're selecting your options in the "Image" export dialog box, you are offered two choices: "Fixed" and "Relative to Page." In theory, "Relative to Page" is the best choice because this means your images will be automatically scaled for the different viewing devices (i.e. iPad, Kindle, mobile phone, laptop). If you select "Relative to Page," however, your images will export with pixilation.
This may not happen to everyone, but it happened to me, as well as the last tech I spoke in India. I'm using a MacBook Pro running 10.6.7. Don't know what he was using, but he got the same results on his end when exporting an image to ePub using "Relative to Page." For me, the fonts look especially horrible in Adobe Editions. If you select "Fixed," they'll export just fine, (looked great in Adobe Editions and Kindle Previewer), but don't know how fixed size renders in the different devices.
This particular exchange was last Friday. The tech verified that we had a problem he couldn't solve and told me he had to speak with his "senior," who had already gone home for the weekend. I received an email today informing me that all I had to do was select the high quality performance settings in ID, and the image would look "pretty" while the file was open in the program. Really? I mean, duh. What does that have to do with the EXPORT problem?
And yes, I know to select the maximum quality setting in export. I'm a photographer who has used Photoshop since the 1990s. Used InDesign, QuarkXpress, and Pagemaker, in reverse order for that long as well, so I know how to prepare a file for print and the web. The techs I've spoken with have assured me I'm selecting the correct settings. Program has not only been uninstalled and reinstalled, but I went the extra drastic step of wiping my harddrive and starting over. No third-party plug-ins installed that didn't come with the original Adobe software. Have the latest ID update. The problem simply doesn't have a solution in my case.
Oh, well. As I say, nice guys, but this is my third time speaking with tech support about a problem with Adobe software. Not going to try again. IMHO, the customer service system/process could use some work.

As I said, it may not happen to everyone. Perhaps with a different operating platform or system version it may not happen. I was only reporting it because it happened to not just myself, but to the tech half a world away who shared my screen, saw the problem, and recreated it on his own machine/system.
Here are the selections in the ePub Export dialog box that caused the problem. I can't imagine that what is selected for TOC settings or other non-image settings would have to do with it, but here they are.
1. File > Export > Choose ePub as Format
2. In ePub dialog box: General Settings
Include Document Metadata checked
ePub Cover, you can select Rasterize first page or Use Existing Image File, makes no difference
Ordering, Based on Articles Panel
Formatting Options: Leave as Default
3. In ePub dialog box: Image
Preserve Appearance from Layout checked
Resolution, doesn't matter what you select, all produces the same result
Everything in the first section below this is as default
Image Conversion: JPEG (I've been using JPEG, but also tried it with a TIFF, and even a Photoshop file, no difference)
JPEG Options: Maximum, Progressive
Ignore Object Export Settings: I usually have this checked, but have tried it unchecked, and it made no difference
4. In the ePub dialog box: Contents
Format ePub Content: XHTML
Use InDesign TOC Style checked (I've tried the default, and my own TOC style, no difference)
CSS Options: I've tried Generate CSS and Use existing CSS template, never used Styles only. Made no difference
5. Click OK.
If you need what I do from the beginning...
1. New file: Print (not web, which tends to not honor the HTML tags on export). I typically chose 1024 x 768 because that's the screen resolution for an iPad.
2. Command-D, place file. I've tried JPG, TIFF, even Photoshop files of varying resolutions from 72 to 300. Files sizes from 800x600 to 1024x768 to sizes approximately double this. No difference.
3. Drag cover to Articles Panel and name.
4. Layout rest of eBook, etc.
5. Display performance settings while in ID are set to High Quality.
6. Triple check for errors (always a green light before exporting).
These are ePub files that have validated, after fiddling with the CSS and XHTML file, as necessary, of course. I don't mess with any image coding.
That's the steps!

Illustrator CS4 exporting images with subtle grid overlaye

I've run in to a rather troubling issue where Illustrator seems to be exporting images with a very subtle white grid overlay.
The raw images do not have this grid, neither do the images as viewed in Illustrator.
The grid appears when exporting as .png and .jpg in a variety of resolutions.
Any ideas what's going on or how to remedy?

The images were part of a web mockup that was created in AI.
"Save for Web" did not change the outcome.
I defaulted to Photoshop, which fixed my immediate problem.. but still does not answer my question as to why this is now happening when I have completed this process trouble-free numerous times before.

Adjust export image resolution in Keynote4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for