Adjustment required in Gross block

Hi Gurus,
I have one issue in asset accounting i.e Gross Block is Rs,.1000 and Acc.dep is 200 and net block is 700 this is belongs to fiscaal year 2008. I want do adjustment like in Gross block 950,Acc.dep is 150 and Net block is 700. I can adjust netblock but how to adjust Gross block with out changeing net block.
regards,
ssriram

Hi
Please check the note 50761, you need to post a write-off.
Blaz

Similar Messages

Activate "Value Adjustment Required Indicator" Field in FMX1

Hi Expert
Transaction Code FMX1/FMX2/FMX3 (Earmarked Fund Maintenance), in More Button of earmarked fund line item, there is no Indicator Field for "Value Adjustment Required" marking.
This is the new SAP client setup. I have config field selection string and assigned. I set Opt. Entry for "_Indicator: Amount Change Only with Value Adjustment Document_" but in Earmarked Fund Maintenenace still not be appeared.
I would like to use earmarekd fund with Value Adjustment function (FMXPM1 - FMXPM3) so I need to mark the Value Adjustment Required field in FMX1/FMX2.
Could you please advice, how to show Value Adjustment Required indicator in Earmarked Fund Maintenenace Transaction?
Rgds
Ton

Hi,
Did you switch "IMG - Public Sector Management - Funds Management Government - Funds Management-Specific Postings - Earmarked Funds and Funds Transfers - Maintain Global Settings" indicator for value adjustment?
Regards,
Eli

Help required: Workflow container block missing

Dear All,
My workflow builder strangely doesnt show the container elements block.
How do I add container elements now?
Any idea of the required settings to see and add the container elements?
Please help me out.
Thanks,
nsp

Depends on your version (hint, hint), but my guess is that in the builder you are instead seing the "Step types that can be inserted". Look just at the top of the area. If I am right about your version you will find a line with a text describing what you are seing, and a menu arrow at the right edge. Click the menu arrow to display the list of available 'views'.
The workflow container view is still there in ECC 6.0.

Required the Gross and Net weight

Hi to All,
Please help me on how to config or reqired the Gross weight and net weight in creation of material master in tcode MM01 (Sales: General/Plant)
Thanks,
Ermin D. Concepcion

Hi,
Please check with the following link you can find the BDC Program to Upload Material Master Data (MM01)
http://sapprograms.blogspot.com/2008/11/bdc-program-to-upload-material-master.html
Thanks,
Neelima.

Is exception handling required for database blocks?

Hi,
I have a query, if iam having a database block in my form, which is based on a table, and iam displaying the fields directly by dynamically assigning a query to that block, and the saying execute query, in that case is it necessary to handle the no_data_found exception in case there is no data matching the criteria?
Avinash,
Pune.
India.

No, Forms shows you "query retrieved no records" message.

Adjustment required due to modification.

Hi,
We are using Travel Management ERP6.0. SAP provides a screen 9999 (User Data screen) within the dialog program SAPMP56T for customers to store or display custom fields, but this is still considered a modification. We did utilize heavily on this User Data screen (i.e. screen 9999) and include significant amount of custom processing logic (PBO, PAI) and UI onto the screen.
What is the extent to readjust the screen (including logic, UI etc) upon subsequent upgrade or patch update ? Do I have to re-do these changes every time since it may be over-written ? Anyone with similar experience ? Thank you.
Regards
Kir Chern

Since it is a modification, I would say yes, you'll have to do it after every upgrade.
Do you use the Easy Enhancement Workbench (EEWB) for this, or is there a Badi / Screen exit you should have used instead to overcome the problem of a modification??

How to Block Planning for PIR related Dependend Requirements of a BOM Comp?

Hi All,
We have a scenario which has a FERT Material "XY" has a BOM with ROH Materials "C1", "C2" & "C3".
Material "XY" has a PIR for 100 pc and on MRP Run it generates Dep Reqmnt for C1, C2 & C3. When MRP Runs, we want to BLOCK generation of Purchase Requisition for C1 only (because of its high Value, the Buyer does not want to buy it for the PIR Planning).
At the same time there is a Sales Order for "XY" for 50 pc and on MRP Run it creates Dep Reqmnt for C1, C2 & C3 and also Purchase Requisitions.
This time, Buyer wants to have the Purchase Requistion for C1 as a result of Planning Run.
Both "XY" & C1, C2 & C3 are all in Planning Strategy 40 and MRP Type PD
I tried to BLOCK the Pur Req generation by putting the MRP Dep Reqmnts as "1" but it is blocking all the PRs.
Requirement is to block Pur Req generation for PIR Dep Reqmnts and Not-Blocking generation of PR based on Dep Reqmnts from Sales Orders.
How can this be achieved?
Any suggestion is most welcome!
Thanks!
Edited by: Jing Tulio on Apr 23, 2009 2:45 AM

Hi,
A Suggestion:
Create an additional alternative BOM for your "XY".
In this remove the Component C1. Only C2 and C3 will exist.
Create 2 Production Versions.
The 1st PV will have the BOM alternative with all the components.
The 2nd PV will have the BOM alternative with the Components with C2 & C3 only.
Now in MD62/61 for "XY", specify the Production as PV2, so that every time for PIR, system will consider PV2 and in this the component C1 is not included.
For all the other purposes (sales order --> Pl. Order --> dependent req.), System will pick the PV1 by default.
Pl. create the PVs for the same date and same lot size.
in MRP4 view, BOM selection method, select - 2 Selection by production version.
Try this and revert for further discussion..
Regards,
Siva

Sales order need to be blocked for delivery while creation

Hi experts,
                My requirement is to block sales orders for delivery, for the selected distribution channels, and for selected countries while creation itself, so for this I came to known that a program MV45AFZZ include, here in this at which form can I write code to block SO for delivery. and is it enough to put a reason in the field LIFSK in VBAK table to block SO for delivery.
Thanks in advance
Regards
SriNivas........

Hi,
You can use form routine USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREAPRE of user exit MV45AFZZ to update the delivery block.
MOVE '10' to vbak-lifsk.                    "13 is the reason for block in header"
MOVE '10' to xvbak-lifsk.                  "13 is the reason for block in header"
Use following code to update delivery block at item level
MOVE '10' to vbep-lifsp.                      "13 is the reason for block in item schedule line"
MOVE '10' to xvbep-lifsp.                    "13 is the reason for block in item schedule line"
Regards
Vinod

Credit block for Slaes Order on Days Basis

Hi SAP Gurus,
As my client requirement want Credit block for sales order with days basis.For example Customer has credit 5000 and 30 days.Even credit value not exceed on 31st day, But sales order has to block .
Please requesting to all kindly needful for me.

Hi
Check payment terms in Customer master data, billing tab page. We can define payment terms. And if you want to block the customer use dynamic credit check.
Enter 5,000/- in maximum document value in FD32
For Credit management to be working
1. In def of SD type we need to speciy Automatic credit control in the field " Check Credit Limit"
2. In the defination of corresponding item category we have to check the field "Credit Active".
Award points if it is useful
Anil

How to block the status mail for an inbound Idoc to a specific user

Hi,
I have to stop sending the error status mail to a specific user depenidng on Partner Type. This will trigger when an inbound Idoc contains status error(message type INVOIC &ORDRSP).This user needs other mails which are getting triggered with the same Idoc for the same partner. Basically, the requirement is to block only the status mail for that user. The statndard task for this is TS70008125 and it uses the agent determination rule 30000001 (Idoc Administrator).in WE46, this task is assigned to process code EDIR. I have copied the task to a custom task and changed the agent determination rule. I would like to know how will I configure this task so that this custom task will trigger for the status error, without altering other workflows for the same message type & the partner type. Or is there any other way to block the mail?
Thanks,
Santosh

Hi,
I have done the required coding to exclude the specific agent from the rule,copied the task and its ready. My question is how do I map this custom task to a particular partner type, for the message type INVOIC in WE20? (The message type used for the inbound Idoc is INVOIC). I checked the Partner profile in WE20. Most of the process code is using function module as the processing type.
Thanks,
Santosh

How to make the ATP math work - receipts vs requirements

Hello
I have a 'qaundry'.   How can we make receipts match requirments when we use ATP [actually GATP - from ECC to SCM]. This to me to be a simple match problem that SAP has not provided any config. Even opening a message with them has not been helpful and I am opening this message, as per their suggestion, on this forum. Maybe someone out there has encountered this similar situation and can advise on how to handle this as a process + customisation, perhaps ?
We have two distinct processes that are primarily ATP based. [We use GATP / APO]
Process # 1
We use the Check Control : ATP Group - CH
                                              Business event - ZA - for sales orders
In scope of check we consider the following 'receipts'
             Unrestricted Stock
            Blocked / Restricted stock
under "Requirements"we have
Sales Order - for restricted + Blocked stock
deliveries -     for restricted + Blocked stock
The match works fine in this scenario.
In Process # 2 - which is predominantly used,
We use the Check Control :   ATP Group - CH
                                              Business event - A - for Orders
we use the following "receipts"
         Unrestricted Use only [NO Blocked stk etc]
For requirements
       sales orders - unrestricted stock only - this is what we need.
       deliveries - unrestricted stock only - this is what we need.
But because there is no subdivision available as with receipts - by default we also get the requiremenmts from sales orders + delivery line items with restricted / blocked stock .   This makes the match go haywire.
So in process # 2 because we do not consider the receipts for blocked stocks, the requirements from the blocked stock lines creates artificial shortages and we have issues where sales orders do not confirm. The scope of check considers only unrestricted stock but the requirements from restricted stock come in and deflate the ATP stock
Is there a standard way we can net out the blocked / restricted stock related sales orders and deliveries requirement lines from the Check control that does NOT consider blocked receipts ?
Any help, suggestions, guidance in this would be greatly appreciated.
Rupendra K. Sharma

Hi DB49
The business scenario is as follows :
We have separate sales order document type where we want to process restricted / blocked stock only.   We use batch management - so while creating the sales order, we manually assign / enter the batch # in blocked stock status - to the line item.   (I use the "blocked /restricted" stock - to mean the same thing,as opposed to "unrestricted" stock.)
Scope of check
Receipts -   restricted / blocked (50)   + unrestricted stock   (75) = 125
Requirements - restricted / blocked (50) + unrestricted stock (75) = 125
We use a userexit to flip the 'A' to a 'ZA' when this order type is used.   ATP check is okay - as we want to look at the blocked/ restricted stock as well, in addition to the normal unrestricted stock. Math is okay here.
This order type and then its deliveries generate the requirement as expected - the same batch #s / stock we assigned manually. This requirement is under a broad bucket of 'requirement' and does not differentiate whether its restricted or unrestricted.   You will notice that unlike 'requirements',   receipts can be clearly subdivided.
However when we use the standard orders - we want to stick to just unrestricted stock.   The 'A' stays as is - and we look at receipts ONLY in unrestricted stock.    However, the requirements from the blocked stock sales orders and then its deliveries get pulled in - under the broad requirement of - Requirements.
Under this process - Scope of check
Receipts -   restricted / blocked (0)   + unrestricted stock   (75) = 75
Requirements - restricted / blocked (50) + unrestricted stock (75) = 125
Receipts < Requirements by 50 - so we have a shortage.
Basically what we need to do for the second scenario is to filter out the requirements for blocked / restricted stock.
I do hope this helps explain the business process.
Thanks
Rupendra.

Problem with Solution Manager wanting to adjust its own instance

I have a situation where under my landscape components --> systems in SMSY where I have a "yellow" exclamation point in a box that says "newer version exists" for my existing solution manager. When I try to adjust, it doesn't let me select the system because they are on the same host. Therefore, I can't do the adjustment. What is the problem? Any ideas how I can do this adjustment? Thanks. This is very important. Thanks.,

Thanks Ragu. I've dug a little deeper and this is what is happening when I try to assign the Solution Manager instance to a logical component:
I receive an "instance
adjustment required" message for the actual solution manager instance
itself, so I had to manually set the product and set it to leading as
leading (even though there was no other solution manager instance).
This means that the solution manager system itself is set to manual
adjustment. I've gotten it to read from the SLD, but it is still acting as though it is missing a NetWeaver ABAP Server on the same host as the Solution Manager.
Here is what I do to get the above issue to reproduce:
I've done more trouble shooting and found that if I go to installed product versions in the Solution Manager System and click on Clean-up Inconsistencies, I get
the attached screenshot showing that a Product SAP NetWeaver with main instance "Application Server ABAP" is inconsistent (on the same server as the Solutiion Manager instance, the Solutioni Manager instance doesn't show up in the System landscape either). Cleaning up the inconsistency doesn't fix the problem (leaves Application Server ABAP) in place. Meaning when I try to fix the inconsistency it won't let me. Thanks for any help, I really need to figure this out. Thanks.

How to block Sales order for any overdue balance.

There is a need to change SAP setting for blocked Sales Order for due balance. Current SAP setting : block is valid only for "over due
more than 30 days".
The requirement is to block order based on any overdue amount say For example : if we have due balance for 1 day, than system should block the SO.
In current credit management settings applied, there is Static check ( C ) and Oldest open item (C ) with Days oldest item =30 days. Kindly suggest as what changes should be made to reflect the desired changes. Also , help in confirming the thought that Static check itself considers the OPEN ITEMS, so if i am activating static check and REMOVES THE OLDEST OPEN ITEm, will it take any overdue amount automatically and block subsequently. To add to it kindly explain, what is the use of this additional check of Oldest Open Item ( with days = X days ) for creit mngt. can't we maintain it by Static check.
Kindly guide as what to change in OVA8 to have this. All feeedbacks are highly appreciated.

The user want to block SO for 2 types below. System must block SO if the credit limit is exceeded and/or the payment is overdue
Currently Two credit checks in OVA8
1- Static check
2- Payment Overdue check by Oldest Open Item ( 30 Days limit is set)
But, now for SO block due to payment overdue need to be changed from 30 days overdue to any day overdue.
How to acheive the above , Also kindly confirm that Static check contains OPEN ITEMS so Won't static check only carry the functionality to block SO for ANY DAY OVERDUE.
Any feedback is highly appreciable.

Block the Material at Item level in Sales Order automatically for delivery

Hi!
My business scenario needs a material to be Ckecked for Inspection after raising the Sales Order by thirdparty person. So, I need to block that particular material at Item level automatically for delivery and rest of the line items can get delivered. I can do this by selecting the reason for Block at Item level manually, but I want the system to get detemine this block. And one more thing is that there is NO Quality Management module for this. So, let me know what I need to configure for this effect. Thank you.....

hi,
pl check the user exit " userexit_save_document_prepare" or "userexit_save_document".
Take the help of your abaper to see if the logic written here can affect the item level block in the sales order for inspection. Create new reason for the item level block and have it triggered with this exit. Instead of hard coding which might require regular intervention of abaper for code changes for the business to be able to manage it, maintain a master data in the material master against some field with a key.
now use that key to identify if these materials require to be blocked at the sales order level for inspection. To release this item again the user has to go in VA02 mode to release the block. Let this be done after the inspection of that material.
regards
sadhu kishore

List of blocked IPs?

Does anyone have a good list of blocked IPs? I have no reason for anyone outside of the US to be connecting to my machines. I'm sick of blocking all these different /8 as they come up trying to hammer my FTP site.
I know I can look at the ICANN list, but I'm sure someone already has something made up.

Hi,
What ISP using are the bogons list in these links;
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-ios-template.html
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-bgp-template.html
On top of the bogons list in the links above, some countries have local authorities that police internet in their community and requires ISP to block certain IP Address (or URLs).
Security provider (i.e Symantec, eCop) give their customer lists of rouge IP Addresses to block for some period of time or permaenently.

Adjustment required in Gross block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for