Admin server taking more time to start

Hi All,
I installed OIM 11g R2 in windows server2008 ,
while starting the admin server it is taking the more time, .
Steps i have done.
changed memory parameters for setSOADomainEnv, setOIMDomainEnv, oimenv.bat files.
while starting the admin server it is showing the memory parameters are Xms768m.....xms1024m like that.
can anyone please suggest what changes needs to do to run fast
Thanks,
Valli

user623166 wrote:
Hi Gurus
my database oracle 10.2.0.3 in AIX
I have started expdp to export selective around 130 tables but it is taking more time to start , almost 20 min passed since it start.
$ expdp system/*** parfile=parfile.par
Export: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production on Friday, 22 June, 2012 17:21:26
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_02": system/******** parfile=parfile.par
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
I am not sure that this is enough information for us to suggest something. For starters, can you try selecting less tables than 120 and see what's going on?
Aman....

Similar Messages

Expdp taking more time to start export

Hi Gurus
my database oracle 10.2.0.3 in AIX
I have started expdp to export selective around 130 tables but it is taking more time to start , almost 20 min passed since it start.
$ expdp system/*** parfile=parfile.par
Export: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production on Friday, 22 June, 2012 17:21:26
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_02": system/******** parfile=parfile.par
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
If share me tips and let me know the reason
Regards
Rabi

user623166 wrote:
Hi Gurus
my database oracle 10.2.0.3 in AIX
I have started expdp to export selective around 130 tables but it is taking more time to start , almost 20 min passed since it start.
$ expdp system/*** parfile=parfile.par
Export: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production on Friday, 22 June, 2012 17:21:26
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_02": system/******** parfile=parfile.par
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
I am not sure that this is enough information for us to suggest something. For starters, can you try selecting less tables than 120 and see what's going on?
Aman....

LCM utility taking more time to start

Hi All,
In Hyperion System 9.3.1 when running the LCMUtility.bat file in Hyperion Home\BIPLUS\bin folder it is taking nearly 8-10 minutes to start up the process. The shared services, IR, Core services are in the single box. Even though it is taking time to initialize, it ends with success.
Could anyone please let me know what could be the possible reason why it is taking 8-10 minutes of time to start the process?
Thanks,
Sree

user623166 wrote:
Hi Gurus
my database oracle 10.2.0.3 in AIX
I have started expdp to export selective around 130 tables but it is taking more time to start , almost 20 min passed since it start.
$ expdp system/*** parfile=parfile.par
Export: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production on Friday, 22 June, 2012 17:21:26
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_02": system/******** parfile=parfile.par
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
I am not sure that this is enough information for us to suggest something. For starters, can you try selecting less tables than 120 and see what's going on?
Aman....

J2ee engine is taking more time to start

I we r updating from sp9 -sp14
where we have done updtae for java first .when we r doing the same on EP ,ie in final step (start j2ee engine) is taking more time .can some one can help
regrads
harinath

Hi Harinath
It's takes 25 min to 60 min.
during this phase of installation do not start J2ee server manually if possible, if any error occurs check the error log
regards,
kaushal

"3.x Analyzer Server" EVENT taking more Time when Executing Query

Hi All,
When I am Executing the Query Through RSRT taking more time. When I have checked the statistics
and observed that "3.x Analyzer Server" EVENT taking more Time .
What I have to do , How I will reduce this 3.x Analyzer Server EVENT time.
Please Suggest me.
Thanks,
Kiran Manyam

Hello,
Chk this on query performance:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
Query Performance
Reg,
Dhanya

Query in timesten taking more time than query in oracle database

Hi,
Can anyone please explain me why query in timesten taking more time
than query in oracle database.
I am mentioning in detail what are my settings and what have I done
step by step.........
1.This is the table I created in Oracle datababase
(Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0)...
CREATE TABLE student (
id NUMBER(9) primary keY ,
first_name VARCHAR2(10),
last_name VARCHAR2(10)
2.THIS IS THE ANONYMOUS BLOCK I USE TO
POPULATE THE STUDENT TABLE(TOTAL 2599999 ROWS)...
declare
firstname varchar2(12);
lastname varchar2(12);
catt number(9);
begin
for cntr in 1..2599999 loop
firstname:=(cntr+8)||'f';
lastname:=(cntr+2)||'l';
if cntr like '%9999' then
dbms_output.put_line(cntr);
end if;
insert into student values(cntr,firstname, lastname);
end loop;
end;
3. MY DSN IS SET THE FOLLWING WAY..
DATA STORE PATH- G:\dipesh3repo\db
LOG DIRECTORY- G:\dipesh3repo\log
PERM DATA SIZE-1000
TEMP DATA SIZE-1000
MY TIMESTEN VERSION-
C:\Documents and Settings\dipesh>ttversion
TimesTen Release 7.0.3.0.0 (32 bit NT) (tt70_32:17000) 2007-09-19T16:04:16Z
Instance admin: dipesh
Instance home directory: G:\TimestTen\TT70_32
Daemon home directory: G:\TimestTen\TT70_32\srv\info
THEN I CONNECT TO THE TIMESTEN DATABASE
C:\Documents and Settings\dipesh> ttisql
command>connect "dsn=dipesh3;oraclepwd=tiger";
4. THEN I START THE AGENT
call ttCacheUidPwdSet('SCOTT','TIGER');
Command> CALL ttCacheStart();
5.THEN I CREATE THE READ ONLY CACHE GROUP AND LOAD IT
create readonly cache group rc_student autorefresh
interval 5 seconds from student
(id int not null primary key, first_name varchar2(10), last_name varchar2(10));
load cache group rc_student commit every 100 rows;
6.NOW I CAN ACCESS THE TABLES FROM TIMESTEN AND PERFORM THE QUERY
I SET THE TIMING..
command>TIMING 1;
consider this query now..
Command> select * from student where first_name='2155666f';
< 2155658, 2155666f, 2155660l >
1 row found.
Execution time (SQLExecute + Fetch Loop) = 0.668822 seconds.
another query-
Command> SELECT * FROM STUDENTS WHERE FIRST_NAME='2340009f';
2206: Table SCOTT.STUDENTS not found
Execution time (SQLPrepare) = 0.074964 seconds.
The command failed.
Command> SELECT * FROM STUDENT where first_name='2093434f';
< 2093426, 2093434f, 2093428l >
1 row found.
Execution time (SQLExecute + Fetch Loop) = 0.585897 seconds.
Command>
7.NOW I PERFORM THE SIMILAR QUERIES FROM SQLPLUS...
SQL> SELECT * FROM STUDENT WHERE FIRST_NAME='1498671f';
ID FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME
1498663 1498671f 1498665l
Elapsed: 00:00:00.15
Can anyone please explain me why query in timesten taking more time
that query in oracle database.
Message was edited by: Dipesh Majumdar
user542575
Message was edited by:
user542575

TimesTen
Hardware: Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64; 8 x Dual-core AMD 8216 2.41GHz processors; 32 GB RAM
Version: 7.0.4.0.0 64 bit
Schema:
create usermanaged cache group factCache from
MV_US_DATAMART
ORDER_DATE               DATE,
IF_SYSTEM               VARCHAR2(32) NOT NULL,
GROUPING_ID                TT_BIGINT,
TIME_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
BUSINESS_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
ACCOUNT_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
INSTR_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
EXECUTION_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
NO_ORDERS               TT_BIGINT,
FILLED_QUANTITY          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_FILLED_QUANTITY          TT_BIGINT,
QUANTITY               TT_BIGINT,
CNT_QUANTITY               TT_BIGINT,
COMMISSION               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_COMMISSION               TT_BIGINT,
FILLS_NUMBER               TT_BIGINT,
CNT_FILLS_NUMBER          TT_BIGINT,
AGGRESSIVE_FILLS          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_AGGRESSIVE_FILLS          TT_BIGINT,
NOTIONAL               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_NOTIONAL               TT_BIGINT,
TOTAL_PRICE               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_TOTAL_PRICE          TT_BIGINT,
CANCELLED_ORDERS_COUNT          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_CANCELLED_ORDERS_COUNT     TT_BIGINT,
ROUTED_ORDERS_NO          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_ROUTED_ORDERS_NO          TT_BIGINT,
ROUTED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_ROUTED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
REMOVED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_REMOVED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
ADDED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_ADDED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
AGENT_CHARGES               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_AGENT_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
CLEARING_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLEARING_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
EXECUTION_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_EXECUTION_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
TRANSACTION_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_TRANSACTION_CHARGES     TT_BIGINT,
ORDER_MANAGEMENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_ORDER_MANAGEMENT          TT_BIGINT,
SETTLEMENT_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_SETTLEMENT_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_AGENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_AGENT          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_CLEARING          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_CLEARING          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_EXECUTION          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_EXECUTION     TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_TRANSACTION          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_TRANSACTION     TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_ORD_MGT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_ORD_MGT          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT     TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_AGENT               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_AGENT          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_ORDER_MGT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_ORDER_MGT          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_EXEC               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_EXEC          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_TRANS               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_TRANS          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_CLEARING          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_CLEARING          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_SETTLE               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_SETTLE          TT_BIGINT,
CHARGEABLE_TAXES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CHARGEABLE_TAXES          TT_BIGINT,
VENDOR_CHARGE               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_VENDOR_CHARGE          TT_BIGINT,
ROUTING_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_ROUTING_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_ROUTING          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_ROUTING          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_ROUTING               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_ROUTING          TT_BIGINT,
TICKET_CHARGES               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_TICKET_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES     BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES     TT_BIGINT,
PRIMARY KEY(ORDER_DATE, TIME_DIM_ID, BUSINESS_DIM_ID, ACCOUNT_DIM_ID, ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID, INSTR_DIM_ID, EXECUTION_DIM_ID,EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID),
READONLY);
No of rows: 2228558
Config:
< CkptFrequency, 600 >
< CkptLogVolume, 0 >
< CkptRate, 0 >
< ConnectionCharacterSet, US7ASCII >
< ConnectionName, tt_us_dma >
< Connections, 64 >
< DataBaseCharacterSet, AL32UTF8 >
< DataStore, e:\andrew\datacache\usDMA >
< DurableCommits, 0 >
< GroupRestrict, <NULL> >
< LockLevel, 0 >
< LockWait, 10 >
< LogBuffSize, 65536 >
< LogDir, e:\andrew\datacache\ >
< LogFileSize, 64 >
< LogFlushMethod, 1 >
< LogPurge, 0 >
< Logging, 1 >
< MemoryLock, 0 >
< NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS, BYTE >
< NLS_NCHAR_CONV_EXCP, 0 >
< NLS_SORT, BINARY >
< OracleID, NYCATP1 >
< PassThrough, 0 >
< PermSize, 4000 >
< PermWarnThreshold, 90 >
< PrivateCommands, 0 >
< Preallocate, 0 >
< QueryThreshold, 0 >
< RACCallback, 0 >
< SQLQueryTimeout, 0 >
< TempSize, 514 >
< TempWarnThreshold, 90 >
< Temporary, 1 >
< TransparentLoad, 0 >
< TypeMode, 0 >
< UID, OS_OWNER >
ORACLE:
Hardware: Sunos 5.10; 24x1.8Ghz (unsure of type); 82 GB RAM
Version 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
Schema:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART
TABLESPACE TS_OS
PARTITION BY RANGE (ORDER_DATE)
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_MINVAL VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-02-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_MAXVAL VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS
NOCACHE
NOCOMPRESS
NOPARALLEL
BUILD DEFERRED
USING INDEX
TABLESPACE TS_OS_INDEX
REFRESH FAST ON DEMAND
WITH PRIMARY KEY
ENABLE QUERY REWRITE
AS
SELECT order_date, if_system,
GROUPING_ID (order_date,
if_system,
business_dim_id,
time_dim_id,
account_dim_id,
ordertype_dim_id,
instr_dim_id,
execution_dim_id,
exec_exchange_dim_id
) GROUPING_ID,
/* ============ DIMENSIONS ============ */
time_dim_id, business_dim_id, account_dim_id, ordertype_dim_id,
instr_dim_id, execution_dim_id, exec_exchange_dim_id,
/* ============ MEASURES ============ */
-- o.FX_RATE /* FX_RATE */,
COUNT (*) no_orders,
-- SUM(NO_ORDERS) NO_ORDERS,
-- COUNT(NO_ORDERS) CNT_NO_ORDERS,
SUM (filled_quantity) filled_quantity,
COUNT (filled_quantity) cnt_filled_quantity, SUM (quantity) quantity,
COUNT (quantity) cnt_quantity, SUM (commission) commission,
COUNT (commission) cnt_commission, SUM (fills_number) fills_number,
COUNT (fills_number) cnt_fills_number,
SUM (aggressive_fills) aggressive_fills,
COUNT (aggressive_fills) cnt_aggressive_fills,
SUM (fx_rate * filled_quantity * average_price) notional,
COUNT (fx_rate * filled_quantity * average_price) cnt_notional,
SUM (fx_rate * fills_number * average_price) total_price,
COUNT (fx_rate * fills_number * average_price) cnt_total_price,
SUM (CASE
WHEN order_status = 'C'
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) cancelled_orders_count,
COUNT (CASE
WHEN order_status = 'C'
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END
) cnt_cancelled_orders_count,
-- SUM(t.FX_RATE*t.NO_FILLS*t.AVG_PRICE) AVERAGE_PRICE,
-- SUM(FILLS_NUMBER*AVERAGE_PRICE) STAGING_AVERAGE_PRICE,
-- COUNT(FILLS_NUMBER*AVERAGE_PRICE) CNT_STAGING_AVERAGE_PRICE,
SUM (routed_orders_no) routed_orders_no,
COUNT (routed_orders_no) cnt_routed_orders_no,
SUM (routed_liquidity_qty) routed_liquidity_qty,
COUNT (routed_liquidity_qty) cnt_routed_liquidity_qty,
SUM (removed_liquidity_qty) removed_liquidity_qty,
COUNT (removed_liquidity_qty) cnt_removed_liquidity_qty,
SUM (added_liquidity_qty) added_liquidity_qty,
COUNT (added_liquidity_qty) cnt_added_liquidity_qty,
SUM (agent_charges) agent_charges,
COUNT (agent_charges) cnt_agent_charges,
SUM (clearing_charges) clearing_charges,
COUNT (clearing_charges) cnt_clearing_charges,
SUM (execution_charges) execution_charges,
COUNT (execution_charges) cnt_execution_charges,
SUM (transaction_charges) transaction_charges,
COUNT (transaction_charges) cnt_transaction_charges,
SUM (order_management) order_management,
COUNT (order_management) cnt_order_management,
SUM (settlement_charges) settlement_charges,
COUNT (settlement_charges) cnt_settlement_charges,
SUM (recovered_agent) recovered_agent,
COUNT (recovered_agent) cnt_recovered_agent,
SUM (recovered_clearing) recovered_clearing,
COUNT (recovered_clearing) cnt_recovered_clearing,
SUM (recovered_execution) recovered_execution,
COUNT (recovered_execution) cnt_recovered_execution,
SUM (recovered_transaction) recovered_transaction,
COUNT (recovered_transaction) cnt_recovered_transaction,
SUM (recovered_ord_mgt) recovered_ord_mgt,
COUNT (recovered_ord_mgt) cnt_recovered_ord_mgt,
SUM (recovered_settlement) recovered_settlement,
COUNT (recovered_settlement) cnt_recovered_settlement,
SUM (client_agent) client_agent,
COUNT (client_agent) cnt_client_agent,
SUM (client_order_mgt) client_order_mgt,
COUNT (client_order_mgt) cnt_client_order_mgt,
SUM (client_exec) client_exec, COUNT (client_exec) cnt_client_exec,
SUM (client_trans) client_trans,
COUNT (client_trans) cnt_client_trans,
SUM (client_clearing) client_clearing,
COUNT (client_clearing) cnt_client_clearing,
SUM (client_settle) client_settle,
COUNT (client_settle) cnt_client_settle,
SUM (chargeable_taxes) chargeable_taxes,
COUNT (chargeable_taxes) cnt_chargeable_taxes,
SUM (vendor_charge) vendor_charge,
COUNT (vendor_charge) cnt_vendor_charge,
SUM (routing_charges) routing_charges,
COUNT (routing_charges) cnt_routing_charges,
SUM (recovered_routing) recovered_routing,
COUNT (recovered_routing) cnt_recovered_routing,
SUM (client_routing) client_routing,
COUNT (client_routing) cnt_client_routing,
SUM (ticket_charges) ticket_charges,
COUNT (ticket_charges) cnt_ticket_charges,
SUM (recovered_ticket_charges) recovered_ticket_charges,
COUNT (recovered_ticket_charges) cnt_recovered_ticket_charges
FROM us_datamart_raw
GROUP BY order_date,
if_system,
business_dim_id,
time_dim_id,
account_dim_id,
ordertype_dim_id,
instr_dim_id,
execution_dim_id,
exec_exchange_dim_id;
-- Note: Index I_SNAP$_MV_US_DATAMART will be created automatically
-- by Oracle with the associated materialized view.
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART_UDX ON OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART
(ORDER_DATE, TIME_DIM_ID, BUSINESS_DIM_ID, ACCOUNT_DIM_ID, ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID,
INSTR_DIM_ID, EXECUTION_DIM_ID, EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID)
NOLOGGING
NOPARALLEL
COMPRESS 7;
No of rows: 2228558
The query (taken Mondrian) I run against each of them is:
select sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."NOTIONAL") as "m0"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."FILLED_QUANTITY") as "m1"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."AGENT_CHARGES") as "m2"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."CLEARING_CHARGES") as "m3"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."EXECUTION_CHARGES") as "m4"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."TRANSACTION_CHARGES") as "m5"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."ROUTING_CHARGES") as "m6"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."ORDER_MANAGEMENT") as "m7"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."SETTLEMENT_CHARGES") as "m8"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."COMMISSION") as "m9"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_AGENT") as "m10"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_CLEARING") as "m11"
--,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_EXECUTION") as "m12"
--,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_TRANSACTION") as "m13"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_ROUTING") as "m14"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_ORD_MGT") as "m15"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT") as "m16"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES") as "m17"
--,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."TICKET_CHARGES") as "m18"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."VENDOR_CHARGE") as "m19"
          from "OS_OWNER"."MV_US_DATAMART" "MV_US_DATAMART"
where I uncomment a column at a time and rerun. I improved the TimesTen results since my first post, by retyping the NUMBER columns to BINARY_FLOAT. The results I got were:
No Columns     ORACLE     TimesTen
1     1.05     0.94
2     1.07     1.47
3     2.04     1.8
4     2.06     2.08
5     2.09     2.4
6     3.01     2.67
7     4.02     3.06
8     4.03     3.37
9     4.04     3.62
10     4.06     4.02
11     4.08     4.31
12     4.09     4.61
13     5.01     4.76
14     5.02     5.06
15     5.04     5.25
16     5.05     5.48
17     5.08     5.84
18     6     6.21
19     6.02     6.34
20     6.04     6.75

Query is taking more time to execute

Hi,
Query is taking more time to execute.
But when i execute same query in other server then it is giving immediate output.
What is the reason of it.
thanks in advance.

'My car doesn't start, please help me to start my car'
Do you think we are clairvoyant?
Or is your salary subtracted for every letter you type here?
Please be aware this is not a chatroom, and we can not see your webcam.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

CDP Performance Issue-- Taking more time fetch data

Hi,
I'm working on Stellent 7.5.1.
For one of the portlet in portal its taking more time to fetch data. Please can some one help me to solve this issue.. So that performance can be improved.. Please kindly provide me solution.. This is my code for fetching data from the server....
public void getManager(final HashMap binderMap)
throws VistaInvalidInputException, VistaDataNotFoundException,
DataException, ServiceException, VistaTemplateException
     String collectionID =
getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants.FOLDER_ID_KEY);
     long firstStartTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
HashMap resultSetMap = null;
String isNonRecursive = getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants
.ISNONRECURSIVE_KEY);
if (isNonRecursive != null
&& isNonRecursive.equalsIgnoreCase(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.STRING_TRUE))
VistaLibraryContentFetchManager libraryContentFetchManager =
new VistaLibraryContentFetchManager(
binderMap);
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
          resultSetMap = libraryContentFetchManager
.getFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
* used to add the resultset to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , true);
else
     long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
* isStandard is used to decide the call is for Standard or
* Extended.
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
String isStandard = getTemplateInformation(binderMap);
long endTimeTemplate = System.currentTimeMillis();
binderMap.put(VistaFolderConstants.IS_STANDARD,
isStandard);
long endTimebinderMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
VistaContentFetchManager contentFetchManager
= new VistaContentFetchManager(binderMap);
long endTimeFetchManager = System.currentTimeMillis();
resultSetMap = contentFetchManager
.getAllFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
long endTimeresultSetMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
* used to add the resultset and the total no of content items
* to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , false);
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (perfLogEnable.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
     Log.info("Time taken to execute " +
               "getTemplateInformation=" +
               (endTimeTemplate - startTime)+
               "ms binderMap=" +
               (endTimebinderMap - startTime)+
               "ms contentFetchManager=" +
               (endTimeFetchManager - startTime)+
               "ms resultSetMap=" +
               (endTimeresultSetMap - startTime) +
               "ms getManager:getAllFolderContentItems = " +
               (endTime - startTime) +
               "ms overallTime=" +
               (endTime - firstStartTime) +
               "ms folderID =" +
               collectionID);
Edited by: 838623 on Feb 22, 2011 1:43 AM

Hi.
The Select statment accessing MSEG Table is Slow Many a times.
To Improve the performance of MSEG.
1.Check for the proper notes in the Service Market Place if you are working for CIN version.
2.Index the MSEG table
2.Check and limit the Columns in the Select statment .
Possible Way.
SELECT MBLNR MJAHR ZEILE BWART MATNR WERKS LIFNR MENGE MEINS
EBELN EBELP LGORT SMBLN BUKRS GSBER INSMK XAUTO
FROM MSEG
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB
WHERE WERKS EQ P_WERKS AND
MBLNR IN S_MBLNR AND
BWART EQ '105' .
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002361303'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003501080'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996300'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996407'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003493186'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002720583'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002928122'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002628263'.
Select
Regards
Bala.M
Edited by: Bala Malvatu on Feb 7, 2008 9:18 PM

Takes more time to start & shutdown the database

Hi All,
I have created a database in oracle9i by following manual steps. Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and shutdown also.
but the problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the database and the same during the shutdown. So anyone help me..
the follwing are the pfile specifications:
db_name=practice
instance_name=practice
control_files= 'E:\practice\control\control1.ctl',
'D:\practice\control\control2.ctl'
db_block_size=2048
db_cache_size=20m
shared_pool_size=20m
background_dump_dest='E:\practice\bdump'
user_dump_dest='E:\practice\udump'
Thanks in Advance

Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and > shutdown also.Please restate the above.
problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the >database and the same during the shutdownHow have you compared? Could it be O/S resources, installation of additional software; you have not mentioned the O/S and complete version of your database.
You can review the following although I am bit unclear;
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96533/instreco.htm#440322
Adith

Report rdf with size 8mb taking more time to open

Hello All,
I have a rdf ( reports 6i) report with size 8.5mb taking more time to open and more time to access each field.
Please let me know how do i solve this issue.
Please do the needful.
Thanks.

Thanks for immediate response.
pls let me know how do i know this.
Right now i have the below details from report->help
Report Builder 6.0.8.11.3
ORACLE Server Release 8.0.6.0.0
Oracle Procedure Builder 6.0.8.11.0
Oracle ORACLE PL/SQL V8.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle CORE Version 4.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle Tools Integration Services 6.0.8.10.2
Oracle Tools Common Area 6.0.5.32.1
Oracle Toolkit 2 for Windows 32-bit platforms 6.0.5.35.0
Resource Object Store 6.0.5.0.1
Oracle Help 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Sqlmgr 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Query Builder 6.0.7.0.0 - Production
PL/SQL Editor (c) WinMain Software (www.winmain.com), v1.0 (Production)
Oracle ZRC 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Express 6.0.8.3.5
Oracle XML Parser 1.0.2.1.0 Production
Oracle Virtual Graphics System 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Image 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Multimedia Widget 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Tools GUI Utilities 6.0.5.35.0
Thanks
Edited by: Abdul Khan on Jan 26, 2010 11:54 PM

XML Publisher(XDODTEXE) in EBS taking more time with the same SQL in TOAD

HI
XML Publisher(XDODTEXE) in EBS taking more time with the same SQL in TOAD.
The sql has 5 union clauses.
It takes 20-30 minutes in TOAD compared to running through Concurrent Program in XML Publisher in EBS taking around 4-5 hours.
The Scalable Flag at report level is turned on with the JVM options set to -Xmx1024m -Xmx1024m in Concurrent Program definition.
Other configurations for Data Template like XSLT, Scalable, Optimization are turned on though didn't bounce the OPP Server for these to take effect as I am not sure whether it is needed.
Thanks in advance for your help.

But the question is that how come it is working in TOAD and takes only 15-20 minutes?
with initialization of session ?
what about sqlplus ?
Do I have to set up the the temp directory for the XML Publisher report to make it faster?
look at
R12: Troubleshooting Known XML Publisher and E-Business Suite (EBS) Integration Issues (Doc ID 1410160.1)
BI Publisher - Troubleshooting Oracle Business Intelligence (XML) Publisher For The Oracle E-Business Suite (Doc ID 364547.1)

Create index is taking more time

Hi,
One of the concurrent program is taking more time , We generate the trace file and found that the create index is taking more time.
Below is from the trace file and such type of index creation is happening lot of time in Oracle standard program.
Can somebody let me know why there is a big difference between cpu and elapse time.
We are seeing the PX Deq: Execute Reply Event as well.look idle time for database.
Please let me know which parameter of the database is affecting this.
CREATE INDEX ITEM_CATEGORIES_N2_BD9 ON ITEM_CATEGORIES_BD9(CATEGORY_SET_ID,
SR_CATEGORY_ID,ORGANIZATION_ID,SR_INSTANCE_ID) PARALLEL TABLESPACE MSCX
STORAGE( INITIAL 40960 NEXT 33554432 PCTINCREASE 0) PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 11
MAXTRANS 255
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 3 0 0
Execute 1 0.35 364.82 131168 117945 60324 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.35 364.83 131168 117948 60324 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 80 (recursive depth: 2)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
reliable message 1 0.00 0.00
enq: KO - fast object checkpoint 1 0.01 0.01
PX Deq: Join ACK 6 0.00 0.00
PX Deq Credit: send blkd 112 0.00 0.01
PX qref latch 7 0.00 0.00
PX Deq: Parse Reply 3 0.00 0.00
PX Deq: Execute Reply 604 1.96 364.42
log file sync 1 0.00 0.00
PX Deq: Signal ACK 1 0.00 0.00
latch: session allocation 2 0.00 0.00
Regards,

user12121524 wrote:
CREATE INDEX ITEM_CATEGORIES_N2_BD9 ON ITEM_CATEGORIES_BD9(CATEGORY_SET_ID,
SR_CATEGORY_ID,ORGANIZATION_ID,SR_INSTANCE_ID) PARALLEL TABLESPACE MSCX
STORAGE( INITIAL 40960 NEXT 33554432 PCTINCREASE 0) PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 11
MAXTRANS 255
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          3          0           0
Execute      1      0.35     364.82     131168     117945      60324           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.35     364.83     131168     117948      60324           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 80     (recursive depth: 2)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
reliable message                                1        0.00          0.00
enq: KO - fast object checkpoint                1        0.01          0.01
PX Deq: Join ACK                                6        0.00          0.00
PX Deq Credit: send blkd                      112        0.00          0.01
PX qref latch                                   7        0.00          0.00
PX Deq: Parse Reply                             3        0.00          0.00
PX Deq: Execute Reply                         604        1.96        364.42
log file sync                                   1        0.00          0.00
PX Deq: Signal ACK                              1        0.00          0.00
latch: session allocation                       2        0.00          0.00
What you've given us is the query co-ordinator trace, which basically tells us that the the coordinator waited 364 seconds for the PX slaves to tell it that they had completed their tasks ("PX Deq: Execute Reply" time). You need to look at the slave traces to find out where they spent their time - and that's probably not going to be easy if there are lots of parallel pieces of processing going on.
If you want to do some debugging (in general) one option is to add a query against V$pq_tqstat after each piece of parallel processing and log the results to a named file, or write them to a table with a tag, as this will tell you how many slaves were involved, how, and what the distribution of work and time was.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
To post code, statspack/AWR report, execution plans or trace files, start and end the section with the tag {noformat}{noformat} (lowercase, curly brackets, no spaces) so that the text appears in fixed format.
"Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
Carl Sagan

Query accessing SSAS cube is taking more time in power view report

Hi,
My SSAS server is having 16 Core's . I have created a power view in sharepoint site, which is accessing ssas cube.
The report is taking more time to show the result. I traced the DAX query using SQL Server profiler. When I ran this DAX query in SSAS server directly, then its taking less time but when the same query running from sharepoint server (power view) , it
is taking more time. Number of records in the fact table is 300M .
Also i tracked the %process time in performance monitor, mostly the line is below 20%. I think the CPU is not fully utilized..
Could you please help me to improve the performance of my report.
Regards,
Arun

Hi Arun,
According to your description, you create a PowerView report in SharePoint site connect to SSAS cube, the problem is that it take long time to show the result in the report, now you want to improve report performance, right?
In your scenario, you said that it takes more time to return the result in PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. For a report, its run time contain retrieval data time and render report time. So it takes more time to return the result in
PowerView report than run the query directly in SSMS. And there are 300M records in the fact table, the performance can be caused by large data. Here is a blog which describes tracks down Power View performance problems.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/psssql/archive/2013/07/29/tracking-down-power-view-performance-problems.aspx
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

SSRS report taking more time but fast in SSMS

SSRS report taking more time but fast in SSMS,We are binding a string which more than 43000 length each and total number records is 4000.
Plese do the needful.It is not possible to create index because it crosses 900 byte.

Hi DBA5,
As per my understanding, when previewing the report, there are three options to affect the report performance. They are data retrieval time, processing time, rendering time.
The data retrieval takes time to retrieve the data from the server using a queries or stored procedures, the processing time takes time to process the data within the report using the operations in the layout of the report and the rendering time takes time
to display the information of the report and how it is displayed like excel, pdf, html formats. It is the reason why report take more time than in SSMS.
To improve the performance, we need to improve the three aspects. For the details, please see the great blog:http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mariae/archive/2009/04/16/quick-tips-for-monitoring-and-improving-performance-in-reporting-services.aspx
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Heidi Duan
Heidi Duan
TechNet Community Support

Essbase Calculation Script taking more time in new environment

Hi Everyone:
We have four environments in our implementation.
1. DEV Environment - 64 bit Essbase Version 11.1.1.3
2. PreProd Environment - 32 bit Essbase Version 9.3.0
3. PreProd Environment - 64 bit Essbase Version 11.1.1.3
In the above mentioned environment PreProd Environment - 64 bit Essbase Version 11.1.1.3 is a newly installed
environment.
We have migrated our Application from PreProd Environment - 32 bit Essbase Version 9.3.0 to PreProd Environment - 64 bit Essbase Version 11.1.1.3. A calculation script that takes only 20 minutes in 32 bit PreProd is taking more than
5 and half hours in newly installed 64 bit PreProd.
We have also migrated our Application from DEV Environment - 64 bit Essbase Version 11.1.1.3 to PreProd Environment - 64 bit Essbase Version 11.1.1.3. The calculation script that takes only 20 minutes in 64 bit Dev is taking more than 5 and half hours in newly installed 64 bit PreProd.
All the server settings and cache setting everything looks similar in all the three environments.
Please advice us what are all the possibilities that creates the issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Prabhakar.

Hi Cameron,
Thanks for your reply.
I have cross checked the Virtual memory in both servers,in new server it was declared high.
Please find the cfg setting which we are using in our application.
AGENTPORT 1423
SERVERPORTBEGIN 32768
SERVERPORTEND 33768
AGENTDESC hypservice_1
;CSSREFRESHLEVEL auto
;SHAREDSERVICESREFRESHINTERVAL 30
CALCCACHEHIGH 199999999
CALCCACHEDEFAULT 150000000
CALCCACHELOW 10000000
CALCLOCKBLOCKDEFAULT 3000
DATAERRORLIMIT 10000
UPDATECALC FALSE
EXCEPTIONLOGOVERWRITE FALSE
CALCREUSEDYNCALCBLOCKS FALSE
PORTUSAGELOGINTERVAL 15
QRYGOVEXECTIME 600
LOGMESSAGELEVEL INFO
CALCPARALLEL 6
MAXLOGINS 100000
AGENTDELAY 100
AGENTTHREADS 30
AGTSVRCONNECTIONS 10
SERVERTHREADS 25
EXPORTTHREADS 1
SSLOGUNKNOWN FALSE
CALCNOTICEDEFAULT 10
NETRETRYCOUNT 3000
NETDELAY 2000
__SM__BUFFERED_IO TRUE
__SM__WAITED_IO TRUE
and aslo find the caches that we define:
Index cache:250000
Data Cache:250000
Data file cache:32768
The all above settings are identical both servers.
In New server ,only one script that is taking more time but remaining scripts are working fine with less time.
We also did one test cause that splitting the script in to multiple and executed ,in this cause the script where we are using direct assigning value from member(say A1) to another member(Say A2) is taking more time.But same scripts we executed in old server it executes fine.
Still we are not able to find out exact root cause for this issue.
Could please anyone help me to resove this issue.
Regards,
Prabhakar.

Admin server taking more time to start

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for