Adobe AIR skips Flash Player security sandbox

When I installed the first Adobe AIR Showcase demo, I felt
curious about how will it install itself from inside Flash Player
sandbox. So I clicked "install", and it really installed something
on my own \Program Files ! without my confirmation
How can it be possible, I thought Flash Player had a sandbox
but it looks as it adoble is able so skip it.
If it is publicly available (and not a backdoor), I could use
it to install some ActiveX controls my web application needs to
interact with Excel.
I checked the flash player 9 security pdf document, and it
looks as it flash documents should not be able to write anything to
my local disk.
Regards,
Daniel Montero

You don't need AIR runtime on iOS; see http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/articles/air-on-ios-faq.html#b

Similar Messages

  • About installing adobe air and flash player

    How do I get the adobe flash player and air on my Iphone 5C from a public computer//

    You don't need AIR runtime on iOS; see http://www.adobe.com/devnet/air/articles/air-on-ios-faq.html#b

  • Flash Player Security Sandbox Question

    Hi,
    We have an SWF file with another SWF file inside of it and a FLV that plays on load.
    The address is http://www.inteletravel.com/Movie.cfm
    However, we offer independent travel agents specialized sub domains like samgibson.inteletravel.com that are virtually set up. However, with these sub domains only the root blue SWF shows up. The player controls nor the FLV video itself appear.
    Ww tried an XML cross domain policy file with no luck even though ithas worked for us with multiple sites in the past.
    Any suggestions would be most appreciated.
    Thanks.

    I just tried the link for FP for ActiveX (Internet Explorer) in Pat Willener's above reply, and the link did not work.  Received this reply from Internet Explorer:
    Oops! This link appears to be broken.
    Did you mean: macromedia.com
    I tried copying the url from the Properties of the link, and pasting it into a fresh browser window.  Same result.
    Is there an updated link available, that works?
    Sincerely,
    SpaceAdventurer

  • Remove Adobe Flash Player Security Alert without changing the browser settings

    Dear all,
    I m using captivate for doing my eDemo, however I am just be
    alerted by Adobe Flash Player Security and be requested to update
    the Internet>Settings of the browser. As I found that some
    companies most likely are using Captivate for their web application
    demonstration (like HSBC,
    HSBC),
    but they dont have any Adobe Flash Player Security prompted. Would
    anyone know how to remove or skip the alert? Thanks for your help!
    Regards,
    Maggie

    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    maggie_822
    Dear all,
    I m using captivate for doing my eDemo, however I am just be
    alerted by Adobe Flash Player Security and be requested to update
    the Internet>Settings of the browser. As I found that some
    companies most likely are using Captivate for their web application
    demonstration (like HSBC,
    HSBC),
    but they dont have any Adobe Flash Player Security prompted. Would
    anyone know how to remove or skip the alert? Thanks for your help!
    Regards,
    Maggie
    I'm having the exact same problem. Is there a way to suppress
    these warnings?

  • Adobe Flash Player Security on Mac OSX 10.8.5

    Hello, I need some help. I keep getting an Adobe Flash Player Security warning every time I try to load Pandora on my Mac. I not sure if this is some form of spyware. I've tried to research it online but I can't find anything with this specific error message. Also I've run a few antivirus/spyware programs, but turned up with nothing. I've never come across it before when using Pandora in the past, so I know it's something out of the ordinary.
    Thank you all very much for the assistance.

    There's a local file "/about/srcdoc" (I'd imagine it's in the Muse-Pandora folder) that's attempting to connect to the Internet. This is a "safety feature" built into Flash Player to prevent malicious files from connecting and downloading a virus. Why they have that for Mac OS I do-not-even-pretend-to-know, but it's there.
    Open your System Preferences and the Flash Player pref pane
    Click the "Advanced" tab in the Flash Player Settings Manager window
    Scroll down to Developer Toos and click "Trusted Location Settings...:
    Click "Add Folder..."
    Select the Muse-Pandora folder in your Applications folder
    Confirm
    Close the Manager and retry it.

  • Mac Safari "Adobe Flash Player Security" issue

    Using Captivate 5.5 for Mac. I've been having sporadic problems viewing my published .htm files in Safari. I always get the "Adobe Flash Player Security" popup on initial load, but before today I could usually just click OK and refresh the browser window to play the Flash content. Today I can no longer view the content in Safari. (Firefox plays the content fine.)
    The popup says "To let this application comminicate with the Internet, click "Settings". When I click Settings, my Mac OS Flash preference dialog opens. But the only options available are "Local Storage Settings", "Camera and Mic", "Playback" (which pertains to peer-assisted networking, not local playback), and "Advanced" (which only allows you to delete local files). Just for experimentation, I tried adding my local path as an allowed site in "Local Storage Settings" but it doesn't have any effect.
    I don't have any other problems using regular Flash-based websites in Safari. Only my published Captivate files spawn this security popup.
    How do I fix this?

    It worked! Thank you. (Actually, I used the related URL for "Global security settings for content creators" (http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager04a.ht ml#119065) since that URL is intended for local development/testing, whereas the link you provided is for sites on the Web.)
    But I'm curious. . .  according to Adobe (http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager.html), "Beginning with Flash Player 10.3, the Local Settings Manager supersedes this Online Settings Manager for managing global settings on Windows, Mac, and Linux computers." Yet the page goes on to explain when one would use the online Global Settings. This is very confusing. If the local Settings Manager supercedes the online manager, why would the online manager still be required for certain uses? And why isn't a link to the Global Settings manager provided within the local Settings manager. What am I not understanding?

  • Adobe flash player security blocking

    The adobe flash player security  is blocking mail with the message /about/srcdoc is trying to communicate with this interner-enabled location  static.adsafeprotected.com
    How do I get rid of this?

    IanGCou wrote:
    How much of a risk is it unblocking?
    If you select a single site to allow, not much, as long as it's a trusted site and you're careful about what you open there (in this case it being mail, you need to use your own discretion). If you set Flash Player to allow ALL sites, then you may be opening yourself up to anything from spyware to outright viruses.

  • Adobe Flash Player Security pop up during installation.

    Hello, I recently purchased a macbook this week. My first apple computer. I was downloading and installing a widget, astroids, through apples website and after installation I noticed a dialogue box appeared. It said "Adobe Flash Player Security" as the title and then it showed where the downloaded file was located. I looked in the folder where it said it should be located but nothing was in that folder. I couldn't close the message box, it just stayed their with my mouse pointer doing a circular pattern. I eventually restarted my computer because I didn't know how to get rid of it. My question is should this be something I should be be worried about? Is everything ok with my macbook? Sorry if this sounds silly, I am new to owning an apple computer and trying to get familiar with it. Thank You.

    For the Flash Player stuff, start with http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/articles/localcontent/
    After sorting that out, see:
    Switching from Windows to Mac OS X,
    Basic Tutorials on using a Mac,
    Mac 101: Mac Essentials,
    Anatomy of a Mac,
    MacTips, and
    Switching to the Mac: The Missing Manual, Snow Leopard Edition.
    Additionally, *Texas Mac Man* recommends:
    Quick Assist.
    Welcome to the Switch To A Mac Guides,
    Take Control E-books, and
    A guide for switching to a Mac.

  • Adobe: No Linux Flash Player Till 2007

    see
    http://www.crn.com/sections/custom/custom.jhtml?articleId=192501179
    >>
    Adobe: No Linux Flash Player Till 2007
    By Stacy Cowley, CRN
    2:25 PM EDT Fri. Sep. 01, 2006
    Impatient Linux users will have to wait till the end of the
    year for even a
    preview release of Adobe's Flash Player 9.
    The company's lead Flash for Linux engineer, Mike Melanson ,
    reported this
    week in his blog that Adobe won't release any alpha versions
    of its Flash
    port, holding out instead for a full-featured beta scheduled
    for release
    sometime late this year.
    Adobe recently released a major Flash overhaul, version 9,
    for Windows and
    Macintosh clients. For Linux users, the release lengthened
    the Flash gap
    between them and other users: Adobe skipped Flash Player 8
    for Linux and
    hasn't released a Linux update since mid-2004. Because Flash
    is not fully
    backward-compatible, Web content developed for the newer
    Flash players often
    won't run in version 7, the most current Linux version.
    Adobe's market
    research shows that 86 percent of U.S. computer users are
    able to view Flash
    8 content.
    "I have to question a cross-platform strategy that has a bias
    against one
    platform," RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady, a Linux user,
    gripped in his
    blog. The lack of a modern Flash player leaves him unable to
    view content on
    a number of Web sites, including major destinations like
    ESPN.com.
    An Adobe spokesman said the company expects a full release of
    Flash Player 9
    for Linux in early 2007. Because of the "short" cycle between
    Flash Player 8
    and 9 -- ten months -- Adobe opted to skip version 8 for
    Linux and move
    directly to version 9, he said.
    Melanson's blog tracks the day-to-day progress and decisions
    Adobe is making
    on Flash for Linux. A full-time Linux user since 1999,
    Melanson shares the
    frustration of his comrades about Adobe's Linux lag.
    "In September, 2005, I happened [across a blog that]
    mentioned in passing
    that Macromedia was looking for someone to port Flash Player
    to Linux. I
    applied for the job and now here I am," he posted.
    "When I started at Adobe, I found out that there is a shadow
    cabal of
    engineers that very much want to see the current Flash Player
    run on Linux,
    and would even try their hand with the current codebase from
    time to time.
    But there are only so many hacking hours in the day."
    >>

    > It sounds to like Adobe are using outdated development
    practices.
    > The kinds of systems multiplatform developers use these
    days
    That's the point .. 'these days'.
    Much of the problem is older code, must be over a decade old
    now) which was
    not well written. That is not an uncommon occurence in
    products that have
    such a long existence as flash player. Supported platforms,
    development
    techniques, developer guidelines, management etc all change
    over the years
    and things that seemed 'a good idea at the time' end up
    becoming a problem.
    In hindsight there would be many things that should have been
    done
    differently in the past .. but without a working time-machine
    that cannot be
    fixed, without an enormous investment in development to
    rewrite the code
    base in a manner that can be more easily ported .. which is
    what is
    happening.
    Also the low level optimisations required for such
    cpu-intense real-time
    graphic processing are difficult to port, as they rely on
    optimised assembly
    code for different cpus and chipsets
    And further there is the issue of different operating systems
    and libraries
    to link against on different platforms.
    > nightly/daily automated builds
    Anyone who thinks supporting new platforms its just a matter
    of re-building
    or doing daily builds is naive. There is no indication that
    Adboe does not
    make use of these practices. But continuous integration and
    nightly builds
    are only tools to maintain a port once it is done .. it
    doesn't help you DO
    the port in the first place.
    > From a marketing point of view you want a simultaneous
    release on all
    > platforms
    I'm sure Adobe DO want simulataneous release .. if it were
    possible. But
    that is not possible if the software is not ported to all the
    platforms.
    With it ported to the platforms the vast majority of people
    use (windows and
    mac) it makes sense to release the newer versions that are
    required in order
    to release other major revenue-earning products like Flex.
    That is a valid
    and sound marketting and financial decision.
    > In the case where assembly
    > programming is used compiler intrinsics are more
    maintainable and portable
    > than
    > inline assembly, I can vouch for their high performance
    vs hand tuned
    > assembly.
    You simply cannot get the performance demanded using
    intrinsics.
    > Note that Apple uses gcc and Linux uses gcc and so I
    can't see many
    > incompatibilities at the compiler tools level?
    > Maybe it is lack of experience
    > with Linux, or maybe there have been lots of programmers
    leaving since
    > Adobe
    > took over?
    It may be worth your while reading the blogs by the adobe
    developers where
    they discuss the issues and get feedback from people such as
    yourself.
    > On the subject of buisness priorities, the number one is
    that the customer
    > comes first.
    Exactly .. so MM/Adobe got the player out as quickly as
    possible for the
    majority of their customers. Making EVERYONE have to wait
    while the player
    was ported to all the other minority platforms would NOT have
    been good for
    the majority.
    As they say .. you can't please all the people all the time.
    You have to
    pick you battles.
    > In particular where websites are concerned you want to
    get access
    > to as many users as possible.
    Exactly .. and FlashPlayer penetration and usage stats reveal
    that it IS
    availble to the vast majority of users and moreso than most
    other
    multi-media technologies
    > The quoted 86 percent of users able to view flash 8
    content is probably
    > an over estimate and this figure is only stated for the
    US
    > as most of work in a global marketplace these days
    figures like this are
    > not very usefull.
    Have you even looked at all the figures (which you don't seem
    to believe
    anyway) .. its worldwide and broken down into regions.
    > The internet is all about maximising your potential
    customer
    > base and anything which prevents a siginificant minority
    just makes no
    > buisness
    > sense at all.
    Its only significant when you are part of it :) The vast
    majority of
    people, and those with the money to spend, are using Windows
    and Mac.
    That's where the customer base is.
    > The bad publicity that Adobe has generated from
    delaying/canning
    > a Linux version of flash player is cumulative and the
    internet is all
    > about
    > word of mouth. I hope for Adobe's sake they don't
    neglect their customers
    > needs
    > in future.
    I'm sure they won't .. which is why they are still activly
    porting to other
    platforms.
    I would much rather see them take the time to do it right,
    rather than let
    quality slip in order to rush out a half-done product to
    satisfy the demands
    of the few.
    Jeckyl

  • Help flash player security popup

    Hello i keeps on having this  message poping up on my Fire Fox browser. Its to do with Flash Player  Security. anyone able to help???
    Adobe  Flash player has stopped a potentally unsafe opperation. The following  loacal application on your computer or network  chrome\\tavgp\content\html\tabswelcom.htm is trying to comunicate  with  this internet-enabled location: s.nsdsvc (that part changes) To let this  application communicate with the internet, click settings.

    jamesp282 wrote:
    To let this  application communicate with the internet, click settings.
    And did you click Settings?
    You may also be able to change the security settings at http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager04.htm l

  • [svn] 854: Update AIR and Flash Player builds

    Revision: 854
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-03-18 13:43:42 -0700 (Tue, 18 Mar 2008)
    Log Message:
    Update AIR and Flash Player builds
    AIR: 031608apms
    Player:r119
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/libs/player/playerglobal.swc
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/air/air_version.txt
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/air/mac/AIR Integration Kit.tbz2
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/air/win/AIR Integration Kit.zip
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/lnx/flashplayer.tar.gz
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/lnx/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/lnx/libflashplayer.so.tar.gz
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/mac/Flash Player.app.zip
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/mac/Install Flash Player 9 UB.dmg
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/win/FlashPlayer.exe
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/win/Install Flash Player 9 ActiveX.exe
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/win/Install Flash Player 9 Plugin.exe

    http://blogs.adobe.com/rgalvan/2011/11/adding-fp11-support-to-flash-pro-cs5-and-cs5-5.html

  • [svn] 936: Update AIR and Flash Player builds

    Revision: 936
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-03-26 12:43:50 -0700 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008)
    Log Message:
    Update AIR and Flash Player builds
    AIR: 20080325apms.2
    Player:r124
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/libs/player/playerglobal.swc
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/air/mac/AIR Integration Kit.tbz2
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/air/win/AIR Integration Kit.zip
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/lnx/flashplayer.tar.gz
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/lnx/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/lnx/libflashplayer.so.tar.gz
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/mac/Flash Player.app.zip
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/mac/Install Flash Player 9 UB.dmg
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/win/FlashPlayer.exe
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/win/Install Flash Player 9 ActiveX.exe
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/in/player/win/Install Flash Player 9 Plugin.exe

    http://blogs.adobe.com/rgalvan/2011/11/adding-fp11-support-to-flash-pro-cs5-and-cs5-5.html

  • Flash Player Security error when publishing HTML files

    I am new to the Captivate world and am just in love with the
    features - but I have been having a very difficult time publishing
    my "movies". I have 8 files that are all called upon in one movie
    (like a table of contents). I have abandon the though of publishing
    each as an EXE file - and have decided to go the HTML route.
    However when I try to run the published HTML file I get an Adobe
    Flash Player Security error - saying "Adobe Flash Player has
    stopped a potentially unsafe operation." It then says that the
    local SWF file is trying to communicate with the Internet-enabled
    HTM file.
    Can someone please tell me what this means? We are using
    Captivate for distance learning as well as internal - so I can't
    know for sure what the end-users will be using when the files are
    used.
    Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

    Welcome to our community, Rachel
    Where are you running your movie from? If you are planning on
    running them from a server, there should be no need to worry about
    your end user seeing those messages. However, if you are planning
    on each user copying them to their own hard drive or if you are
    running from a CD-ROM, you may need to perform some trickery to
    make them work without issue.
    The message is occurring because there are links in some of
    the files that point to internet resources and the Flash player is
    seeing that as a potential security risk. So it is blocking the
    action until you pat it on the head and assure it the world will
    not, in fact, end if it shows you the content.
    If you wish to banish the screen on your PC, take a look at
    the tutorial linked below.
    Click
    here to view a tutorial
    I'll hold off on the other bit until I'm certain what we are
    dealing with.
    Cheers... Rick

  • Remove "flash player security" alert

    Is it possible to avoid
    “flash player security” alert dialog box.
    My project is built in flash 6 but it won’t run under
    flash player 8.
    It gives security alert dialog box, and client asks me to
    remove this dialog box.
    Is it possible to remove it or not?
    Or is there any documentation available on net stating that
    it’s not possible to remove it?:confused

    The answer is inside the same article you quote, page 3:
    "Local-trusted: This sandbox has no restrictions. It offers the
    same open privileges as all local files were given in Flash Player
    7. Any local file may be placed in this sandbox if given
    authorization by the end user. This authorization may come in two
    forms: interactively via the Settings Manager or noninteractively
    via an exectuable installer that creates Flash Player configuration
    files on the user's computer."
    So you might have the user do something which is a lot more
    work than clicking ok in a security alert (I haven't even done it
    myself on my machine).
    Or you might provide an executable that needs to be
    downloaded with at least two more security alerts.
    The situation of course changes if you can deliver that
    executable in a different form, e.g. via a CD-ROM

  • Getting Flash Player Security Error when running extension.

    I had created a nifty utility which uses a Flash interface.  It worked fine in CS3, but after upgrading to CS4, I keep getting the Flash Player Security Error popup when I run it.
    =======================================
    Adobe Flash Player Security
    Adobe Flash Player has stopped a potentially unsafe operation.
    The following local application on your computer or network:
    C:\Program%20Files\Adobe\%20Photoshop%20CS4\Presets\...\ChopBot.swf
    is trying to communicate with this Internet-enabled location:
    <unknown>
    To let this application communicate with the Internet, click Settings.
    You must restart the application after changing your settings.
    [OK] [Settings...]
    In CS3, opening the Global Security Settings panel and adding the script's path to the trusted locations would fix this problem, and the utility would work going forward.
    In CS4, however, adding the script's path to the trusted locations seems to have no effect.
    I am using the ExternalInterface class in the Flash UI to communicate to and from the JavaScript.
    Has anyone else run into this issue and found a solution?
    ~§~

    Welcome to our community, Rachel
    Where are you running your movie from? If you are planning on
    running them from a server, there should be no need to worry about
    your end user seeing those messages. However, if you are planning
    on each user copying them to their own hard drive or if you are
    running from a CD-ROM, you may need to perform some trickery to
    make them work without issue.
    The message is occurring because there are links in some of
    the files that point to internet resources and the Flash player is
    seeing that as a potential security risk. So it is blocking the
    action until you pat it on the head and assure it the world will
    not, in fact, end if it shows you the content.
    If you wish to banish the screen on your PC, take a look at
    the tutorial linked below.
    Click
    here to view a tutorial
    I'll hold off on the other bit until I'm certain what we are
    dealing with.
    Cheers... Rick

Maybe you are looking for