Adobe, please don't kill Dreamweaver !

I just acquired a client that wants a site redesign. I
started looking at the code and being a Dreamweaver user since
version 4, I was quite taken back with all the
<csimport>...etc... tags. So I started a Google search and I
was surprised to find limited information on all these tags. So
after going through and finally realizing that these tags basically
do a whole bunch of nothing and just reference the bloated 36 page
javascript file for basic user interactivity, I started to get
depressed.
Is this what Adobe is going to do to Dreamweaver? Take a
serious program, for actual coders and turn it into MS FrontPage??
Personally, I make a living by typing <html>. Not
clicking "OK".
Sorry to vent, but am I the only one out there that is scared
to death about what Adobe is going to be doing in the next versions
of Dreamweaver?
I will openly admit that I would use Notepad before using
GoLive or a MS Version of Dreamweaver, or just bust out an old
version of Homesite.
If there is a God, now would be a good time for saving!

Relax. You are looking at native GL markup that should have
been stripped
before the page was uploaded.
> Sorry to vent, but am I the only one out there that is
scared to death
> about
> what Adobe is going to be doing in the next versions of
Dreamweaver?
Don't worry about this.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"AM29CNTS" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:f8ld6l$pjr$[email protected]..
>I just acquired a client that wants a site redesign. I
started looking at
>the
> code and being a Dreamweaver user since version 4, I was
quite taken back
> with
> all the <csimport>...etc... tags. So I started a
Google search and I was
> surprised to find limited information on all these tags.
So after going
> through
> and finally realizing that these tags basically do a
whole bunch of
> nothing and
> just reference the bloated 36 page javascript file for
basic user
> interactivity, I started to get depressed.
> Is this what Adobe is going to do to Dreamweaver? Take a
serious program,
> for
> actual coders and turn it into MS FrontPage??
> Personally, I make a living by typing <html>. Not
clicking "OK".
>
> Sorry to vent, but am I the only one out there that is
scared to death
> about
> what Adobe is going to be doing in the next versions of
Dreamweaver?
> I will openly admit that I would use Notepad before
using GoLive or a MS
> Version of Dreamweaver, or just bust out an old version
of Homesite.
>
> If there is a God, now would be a good time for saving!
>
>

Similar Messages

Does adobe plan to kill dreamweaver?

I love Dreamweaver and have been turned off from Go Live
since Adobe first released it. However, all the suites and bundles
seem to neglect Dreamweaver. This might not be the right forum for
this question, but I'm hoping someone from Adobe will chime in. I
hesitate to buy both a bundle and then tack on the extra cost for
Dreamweaver (that's how much I don't want to use GoLive). I there a
substitution option? Should I just accept the death of Dreamweaver
and move on?

I do. There are some very nice features in GL.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"PizzaGood" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:ec5bg2$dml$[email protected]..
> "may integrate pieces of GoLive into it" .....I hope
not!
>
>
> "Bill Horvath" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
> news:ec5a72$c95$[email protected]..
>> Adobe won't kill Dreamweaver. It has a greater
market share than GoLive.
>> They may integrate pieces of GoLive into it, but the
foundation will most
>> likely be DW. Of course anything you hear in this
forum is speculation,
>> so
>> take it with a grain of salt.
>>
>> --
>> Extending Knowledge, Daily
>>
http://www.communityMX.com/
>> CommunityMX - Free Resources:
>>
http://www.communitymx.com/free.cfm
>>
>> No registration req'd for free content
>> "achastain" <[email protected]>
wrote in message
>> news:ec52qo$3dq$[email protected]..
>>> I love Dreamweaver and have been turned off from
Go Live since Adobe
>>> first
>>> released it. However, all the suites and bundles
seem to neglect
>> Dreamweaver.
>>> This might not be the right forum for this
question, but I'm hoping
>> someone
>>> from Adobe will chime in. I hesitate to buy both
a bundle and then tack
>>> on
>> the
>>> extra cost for Dreamweaver (that's how much I
don't want to use GoLive).
>>> I
>>> there a substitution option? Should I just
accept the death of
>>> Dreamweaver
>> and
>>> move on?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

The people's posted videos no longer work on my ipad Note: I am using the Facebook app, I am not using safari Please don't tell me to use adobe flash player, it is not compatible with ipad, but it used to work nevertheless.

The people's posted videos no longer work on my ipad
Note: I am using the Facebook app, I am not using safari
Please don't tell me to use adobe flash player, it is not compatible with ipad, but it used to work nevertheless.

Facebook videos are still working for me in the Facebook App (using iOS 7.0.6).
Have you tried restarting or resetting your iPad?
Restart: Press On/Off button until the Slide to Power Off slider appears, select Slide to Power Off and, after It shuts down, press the On/Off button until the Apple logo appears.
Reset: Press the Home and On/Off buttons at the same time and hold them until the Apple logo appears (about 10 seconds).
No data will be lost.

Adobe, please help me with my transition to the Photography Program

It has cost me days with no effect.
Her eis what I want: have my one-app Photoshop CC to be transitioned to the Photography Program - which I managed to buy from Adobe (by telephone, in Dutch). I have the confirmation.
First of all: I live in The Netherlands. If I try to use any Customer Care site it wants me to pick my Adobe Product and that's all I can do.
Sometimes I see: Contact us but there is no way to click on anything.
Please don't tell me to phone Adobe because it holds me on wait for more than half an hour so I give up. And if I could get through I am afraid I have to talk again with someone who speaks even lousier English then I do.
Can someone from Adobe fix this issue please???

Hi harrieb
I've cancelled your original single app Photoshop plan as requested.
Thanks
Bev

Android Adobe reader don't open pdf Hyperlink

Hi all, i'm trying to develop an android application, and i would like to know why the adobe reader don't recognize the hyperlink in a pdf file...
I would like to know if my settings are wrong or the adobe reader application does not support that feature..

Please repost in the Android Adobe Reader forum:
http://forums.adobe.com/community/adobe_reader_forums/android

Adobe - please explain how to soft proof in LR2

I have read all the messages I could find. It seems clear that LR2 has no soft proofing of my prints. And yes, I am working with a color managed screen.
So Adobe, please tell us how you intend us to soft proof our images????

>Really? "most professionals do not calibrate their monitors." I find that unbeleavable.
Me too, but I know a few working pros that simply trust their expensive monitor is good enough. Weirdly some of them will spend a long time obsessing over color (typically skin tones) but don't bother to calibrate. This just boggles my mind. Seems to work for them fine though.
>I will agree that I am getting amazing prints out of LR2
Color is great for me too. However, I identified a major, reproducible on multiple machines, resolution bug with LR 2's print module at least in the OS X version and am curious if others see it too, especially on windows.
Jao, "Loss of Sharpness Printing Actual Size from Lightroom" #15, 24 Aug 2008 11:22 pm
In short. I. Printing at native resolution by unchecking "print resolution" does not work. LR2 will still scale but to the value now shown in light grey. II. In rotated images (like a portrait format RAW on a portrait paper) LR2 calculates the resolution to send to the printer based on the wrong dimension, resulting in a far lower resolution sent to the printer than specified. LR 1.4 does not have these bugs. This also impacts the print to jpeg feature and makes the Print module in LR 2 basically useless for me as I can only trust it to do the right thing in a limited set of circumstances.

I need that Adobe reader don`t update automatically.

Good Afternoon
In My company actually have problems with the Adobe reader update, we had worked in various solutions for example , in the program option Edit/preferences option update and check in No download.... other was program files/common files/Adobe/ rename the folder update with other character or other name.
this solutions was not succesfull , I have the problem yet.
I need help with this situation because my data channel is not working correctly, my users have problems.
If somebody know about one solutions please help me!
I need that Adobe reader don`t update automatically.
Have good day!

If you have a Windows Domain environment in your company and domain controllers are Windows 2008/2008 R2, than you can use this Grou Policy Templates: https://sourceforge.net/projects/customadmx/
They are capable of switching auto updates off.

CS6 Adobe Extension Manager opens in Dreamweaver but then stalls

CS6 Adobe Extension Manager opens in Dreamweaver but then stalls and never opens anything, nor can I install anything.
I have removed and installed the Ext manager twice, no help at all.

Hi Tr_moore,
Apologies that you have been facing this issue with Extension Manager, can you please follow below steps and let us know if that works for you.
Sorry we do not have a clean workaround for this issue, There is a slightly destructive workaround, where in all your previously installed extensions for all Adobe Products will be removed, you will need to make note of all the extensions installed for each Adobe Product and install them one at a time after you have followed the below steps.
1. Goto Below folder and Delete it completely
     Win : C:\ProgramData\Adobe\Extension Manager CS6
     Mac : /Library/Application Support/Adobe/Extension Manager CS6
2. Goto Below Folder and Delete it Completely
     Win : %Appdata%\Adobe\Extension Manager CS6
     Mac : ~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Extension Manager CS6
Please notice the difference in the Mac path, there is an extra "~" for point no. 2
3. Uninstall Extension Manager CS6 with Remove Preferences.
4. Now install Extension Manager CS6
Do let us know if this helps.
Mudit
Adobe

Could Adobe please advise if they will be adding tethering support for Nikon D600

Could Adobe please advise if they will be adding tethering support for Nikon D600 as it is instrumental to our decison regarding purchase.
Many thanks

ssprengel wrote:
Nobody is happy with the answer about old software not getting updated with new cameras, but if you look into it, Adobe had to lay off about half their employees over the past few years to keep the company viable in the declining economy, so they don’t have extra people to update and test plug-ins for non-current versions, and if they did, then some people wouldn’t buy the newer version and they’d have even less money.
Adobe has only just gotten the D600 supported for raw format in their current beta version of LR, which affects everyone with a D600, and if they had to wait for Nikon for supply and SDK and also have to prioritize their work to keep things on schedule, tethering is likely to lag behind raw-file support for any particular camera. Apple controls their entire computer environment, hardware and software, so it’s not surprising they can implement tethered capture from day one, but Adobe must figure things out for OSes they don’t own, both Mac and PC, so they rely on waiting for Nikon to do things for them, and then figuring out how to get it to work.
Well boo hoo for Adobe ... life sure is tough for them ... if they can't handle the load maybe they should get out of the business of software development ... They can't be all that worried about revenue to support Lightroom development or they wouldn't have reduced the price of the full version by 50% and the upgrade price by 20% ... it was a less than smart move considering they have been bragging for the past couple of years about how many more folks use Lightroom vs. other competitive options ...
Aperture 3, Capture One both have tether support for the D600 ... and many more cameras than are supported by Lightroom ... those developers are working and engineering solutions in the very same economy as Adobe (and C1 supports both platforms as well, costs much more than Lr and employs far fewer engineers) ... why aren't they suffering from the same lack of support? ... or using the camera makers to deflect blame for the lack of results?
Excuses are not solutions ...

Adobe: Please fix the spacebar cut in multi-camera editing!!

Dear Adobe,
Please fix the BUG which makes a cut in your multi-camera sequence when you hit the spacebar! This is extremely annoying!!
Thanks!
Former FCP User
- Ryan

(imagine the opening of Thriller with the door creaking open and footsteps...you've awoken a sleeping giant...well, not sleeping, recovering actually)
Hi TacoRye.
Welcome to the club. When I saw this post, my eye twitched, my shoulders tensed up and I was brought back to a time (http://forums.adobe.com/message/4714549#4714549) when hitting stop did things that were wrong...just wrong. But as one who's been shut down and locked out of that topic, I'll kindly say that yes, multicam is a bit more enjoyable and free of that design flaw in Premiere CC. In fact, you'll probably like it for a few more things in CC as it's true that they have implemented several FCP favorites in the recent releases that even old schoolers probably say "hmmm, well now this is useful". I was a convert to CS6 from FCP this time last year and open to new things but that stop/pause issue drove me nuts. But it's fixed now in CC. And although I'm dealing with equally frustrating issues in CC on a daily basis unrelated to multcam, unless you use Warp Stabilizer a lot you probably won't experience them. All new software will have its bugs, etc. and I'm still holding out hope that the upcoming release will fix these issues. I have faith. Lots of exciting new features are coming in the next week or so which is all nice and good, but if the actual issues and bugs are fixed, I for one will be even happier.
Bottom line: I encourage you to update to Premiere CC if you do a lot of multicam. Just be sure to update to at least 7.0.1 (the current version as of this post) because the regular 7.0.0 version has a pretty awful multicam bug unrelated to the CS6 thing.
Enjoy...and don't be scared.
(exit with sound of that guy from Thriller laughing...door shuts)

Adobe, please stop running from this issue! (GPU vs CPU anomalies / fades)

Adobe,
I have tried to bring this issue to light many times, and your own users have argued it ad finem, but to no avail! I am TIRED of getting terrible alpha blending (and opacity curve) results with GPU acceleration enabled, vs CPU. In fact, it is SO BAD that I NEVER work with GPU acceleration any more.
Here is the issue:
When GPU acceleration is enabled, you simply CANNOT do a smooth fade and/or cross dissolve. It appears to fade down smoothly to about 20% opacity, and then the next frame it will jump right to 0% quite abruptly and disappear. It's almost as if the fade simply gives up and switches off! Regardless of whether you use Cross Dissolve, or Film Dissolve the results are the same. Also, your alpha blending is all messed up, CLEARLY showing a different result when comparing CPU and GPU rendering outputs. Once again, this issue ONLY exists with GPU acceleration ENABLED. Switch off GPU/MPE and the problems disappear. But of course you lose the speed and other benefits GPU acceleration offers, which would be great to have! Especially seeing as I have also heard (from various other resources) that GPU acceleration can improve the quality of rendering out to compressed formats like H264. But we will never know that, will we? Because, every time I enable GPU, my fades and blending looks noticeably bad!
I have seen in various other threads that your response has been along the lines of: "That's just the way it is". But unless your name is Bruce Hornsby, this response is unacceptable! You cannot advertise a "great feature" of your products (in this case, GPU/MPE), yet when people try to use it and see odd results, simply tell us: "oh by the way, yeah, it does not work in a few scenarios, like fading, but otherwise you are good to go!" The way I see it: cross-fades (even fades in general) as well as opacity/blending are some of the most common, if not THE most common techniques used in video projects! Having an anomaly of this nature showing a DISTINCT difference in quality output when one of your fantastic "features" is enabled is just poor form. What is evern poorer is your responses (or lack thereof) related to the issue. Especially seeing as this problem has been present since CS5, and now we are STILL seeing it in CC!
Here is a thread which documents the issue well (even shows examples, and other details someone prepared for you to apparently ignore):
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/773441
...it was never addressed there.
Another issue which details it going back as far as CS 5.5:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/987306
...once again, never resolved.
Now I am using CC, latest version, up-to-date, a fast i7 processor, a CUDA supported card, and all of those go to waste because I have to have GPU and the mercury playback engine disabled to yield decent quality results.
I implore you, not just for myself, but on behalf of everybody here who has already addressed this issue, but has had their pleas fall on deaf ears: PLEASE FIX THIS PROBLEM. Telling us simply that: "This is the way GPU cards choose to render" is NOT ACCEPTABLE. It's just like me saying when I drive my car on the wrong side of the road: "that's just the way I drive!". Doesn't mean it is acceptable!
You may have won people over since Final Cut Pro screwed the pooch with version X... but I can guarantee if this does not get resolved soon, the issue won't just be isolated to the forums here. Expect to read about it in MANY online publications that I am sure your competitors will ENJOY watching!
Mat.

Indeed. Yes Adobe, please explain.
And here is an example of what I am talking about:
CPU only (MPE and GPU DISABLED):
This appears to be what I would consider accurate, as it is not only well blended, but the fades work smoothly thanks to it relying on the CPU...
GPU (MPE and GPU ENABLED - Linear Color ON - as per default):
This provides identical image quality/blending results as the CPU only benchmark. However, the fades are very abrupt, as per the original problem...
GPU (MPE and GPU ENABLED - Linear Color OFF, as per your recommendation):
This is your recommended solution. The fades are as smooth as they are in the CPU version. But as you can see the color, alpha and blending are VASTLY different. Actually, it looks HORRIBLE! The BG text is barely visible, and the foreground text appears to be more prevalent over the top of the back layer, making its fade-up quite disjointed and selective.
...So as you can see, the "solution" you provided seems to create more problems and/or inconsistencies in the overall output. Now we have no idea what is the "standard"!
I personally find these inconsistency's very concerning. And I am sure I'm not the only one. Please tell me there is actually a logic to this "solution" and it wasn't a simple duct-tape fix that nobody there at Adobe actually looked deeper into to see exactly how it would effect overall image quality! It sure appears that way!
I appreciate that you, Kevin, are not directly responsible for this issue, and you are indeed a representative trying to help. But please realize that for many of us here, we are LONG time Premiere users, with years of experience and influence in this industry, and this definitely isn't our first rodeo! When we flag these issues we do so out of a REAL need, which means the consequences Adobe faces as a result of not addressing these issues are equally as REAL! As such; I encourage you to expedite the process of resolving this issue, because it has been prevalent since CS5.5, and the fact that it is not been resolved and/or has been addressed poorly does not bode well for your overall reputation. Especially when you are trying to make Premiere the industry standard. Like I said, I would hate to have to look at alternatives, so give me a solution, because if I decide to move on from using Premiere, I won't be the last. And no, I am not being melodramatic here. If a piece of software cannot seem to get something as simple as fades and blend modes right (or at least CONSISTENT), how can the software be trusted to handle high-end workflows? Food for thought.
Mat.

I have a currently updated Mac that's fast as lightning. I use eBay A LOT. In the newest version when I hit the back button it takes me to the original "new tab" page. Please don't make me use Chrome or Safari, I love you guys

Hello,
I have a Mac that's fast as lightning running on the latest version of OS X. I use eBay A LOT. In the newest version of Firefox that I just downloaded when I hit the back button it takes me to the original "new tab" page. Please don't make me use Chrome or Safari, I love you guys

Thank you for your kind words on the Tablet, as this is the only product mentioned that is supported on this forum, The forums here are for Home Electronics and Computers, and do not reach the Sony smart phone community.
The Sony smart phone Support Forum is the place for Sony (formerly Sony Ericsson) users from around the world to get help and help others:
your very in depth suggestions and comments would best be heard at the following forum that is dedicated exclusively to the Sony smart phone community.
http://talk.sonyericsson.com/community/support

To SONY management not Sony ericsson Management, please don't do the same mistakes.

Please Don’t Make Same Sony-Ericsson Mistakes
by USER-986393 » Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:40 pm
Congratulations on your Erricsson's share acquire, I must say i have been Sony phone holder from the day SONY CDM-Z1 was created, forced my self to stick with SE... and now happy to come back to SONY again. I would like to talk about couple of things...
Response:
The major fall of SE is the fact that they did not listen to fans and most importantly customers. we complained so much over Xperia X1 and Xperia X10 until SE forced us to purchase other brands due to lack of response. so please, responding to complaints is critical when there are so many better phone makers out there.
Lack of future vision:
Look at the Galaxy S, Galaxy Sii, Iphone... you know what they have in common? light years technology for the same price as Caved in SE phones. Arc vs Sii?... SE was against technology for some reason, for instance. who ever was against dual processor and how much it would attract customers, needs to find another company to put down. Lack of LTE?, how can someone not find that as something a cell phone can use in the future? Market share in USA? why would someone not give the US attention, no one buys a full priced phone these days, that only worked when there was no contracts. these days i don't mind a contract as long as i am getting a phone a i can not afford. also i never understood this frequency difference, why did SE wait until iPhone 4s marketed the idea a "world phone" that works anywhere? why did SE insist on making an American version and an international version? example ARC LT15A and ARC LT15i is it SO HARD to make a phone that has all the frequencies LT15Ai? really? who ever was against that idea needs to go as well.
I will assume who ever is reading the example i mentioned above is grasping the importance of it... it's as simple as this SE would have been more successful had more people bought SE phones, i am interested in the ARC LT18A, well there is only LT18I that wont work 3g on At&t. here are the problems that you will face... 1 - a happy innocent customer that did not know that, purchased a LT18I (international) and realized SE customers service in Canada or USA that it won't work in the U.S. on 3g... 2 - a frustrated customer like me who knew about the difference from previous mistakes and decided to buy an iphone instead just bc of the being neglected or carelessness from SE towards people in the U.S. either way, wither those two two points were shocking to you as a SE manager, or a common fact that is not important enough... that manager needs to go. with a tahnk you note for loosing market share in the U.S. deserves an excelence in that actually.
Wrong Focus, right focus was a little too late:
SE phones especially in 2011 was way behind any other company in smart phones, yes the ARC S was maybe a nice attempt but simply not enough... the world is advancing really fast, if you dont catch the train, then your about to bankrupt. it took forever to jump on really powerful phones and instead there so many variations. you can get a cyber-shot but not a Walkman.. you can get a walkman phone but not as smart as the p900 you can get the p900 but not as slim as the p600. SE was competing with its own self ... lets FOCUS, get your stuff together and make a Quality phone not Quantity phone. (GOOD JOB ON THE TABLET) the variations are based on needs not confusing differences. The ARC was a great phone, but SE had missed the train.
THE UPDATES:
The most frustrating customer service i have ever experienced, and when updates come out, they come out first in Nordic places then in middle east country by country... giving every day more fuel to angry customers wondering when they will be lucky to get an update ... why can't there be one global update for all phones and different updates to phone carriers for each country. make it easier, it does not take a company purchase to do so.
Announcements:
it was frustrating, just like it is right now, i still don't know when ARC S comes out. oh wait i am in the U.S. it comes out "WHENEVER" does it look like i am happy? i need a new phone, how SE expect me to purchase an ARC S when i don't know how long i am waiting for it and there is GALAXY and Iphones released in the markets hovering around me every day?
USA, USA, CHINA, USA:
Why was the U.S. not a focus, please someone answer!
Creativity:
androids are awesome operating systems, they are simply great and simply work every single time you use them. i believe, i gave SE so many ideas, non of them were integrated. to be able to distinguish your self from the rest of the pack; you need to be the alpha. simply having the most powerful phone is one factor, Xmore R is another, crazy led designs. look at the Tablet S, it's not the thinnest, it's not the cheapest, it's not the most powerful, yet it's unique in design. and for the market with the dull flat tablets, who ever designed it should design your new phones. the ARC design was AMAZING but lacked the items that are enough to give it a competitive edge in the market.
Charging:
Why is it only micro USB is the main charger, Why can't it be that and another EASY WAY OF CHARGING, why do we have to wait tell apple go to conductive charging? SONY come up with two ways of charging, micro usb is great cause every one has either a BB or an android somewhere. but imagine just placing your phone on something without me connecting... I AM BUYING.
Pricing:
SE charges an arm and a leg, when Galaxy Sii and iphone 4s are $200.00... do you not thing there is something wrong here?
Accessories:
I have suggested times and times, make more accessories, lets compare phones covers for the Iphone and the Any SE phones... the amusing aspect is, why did not SE see what I see?
Cool names PLEASE:
the ARC is a way to start after 10 years of naming products like fax machines... I need to see Jima, president, awesome... less chemical equations of fax machine names. LT18a, imagine I tell my friends have you seen the LT18a or have you seen the Sony ARC?
FM:
Really? your research says in 2011 people won't buy a phone without FM? and the customers would also do the twist dance from the joy of knowing the phone has FM. it's 2011, perhaps you need to look in your research again.
SonyEricsson does not see the need for a dual processor for an android that won't support it yet:
that right there shows the difference between a company with a long vision and another with a short one. my answer to that statement, please set down get some popcorn as you are just about to watch S ii and iphone 4S a chance to be light years ahead of you, and sell millions of more phones than you. just because someone that works at SE has a very short vision ruining a whole company. president of Syria bashar alasad, believes that his country is under control. the achievements of democratic countries did not impress him and the fall of Lebian, Egyptian, and Algerian presidents did not get him to even think twice about what is happening. it amazes me how people can be so selfish and short visioned.
Waterproof:
Great idea, where is the phone, i am in the U.S. while you are at it, let me suggest accessories. a helmet accessory that would station that phone on my helmet while i am racing... right there i can buy a phone that is weather proof records 720 p and when i am done from my athletic even i can use it as a phone. knowing SE, don't even think about that idea, and i will get an email saying we only have a shoulder accessory for now thank you for inquiring.
Closing fan websites?
xperiablog.net, um........ ?
now there are people at SE that need to be promoted,
Updates had gotten faster and better, but they still need more work
unlocking the boot loader is a great i dea
designs started becoming extra beautiful
SE website is beautiful
facebook page is great
xmor r, phone screen size EXCELENT
forum support is getting better
there many many things I can bring to the table, question is, SONY are you going to do the same Mistakes? or am i going to changes? perhaps you need to hire me, so I can get something done. how open are you to changes? how open are you to listen to your customers and fans? how open are you to realize the completion and take actions to be ahead of the curve? how open are you to realize that the Video games on cell phones are only fun the first 5 minutes but after that iphone 4s is better?
LTE, Gorilla Glass, conductive charging, Unique design, unified phone, focus on 1 - 3 phones for the whole year, interactive customer service, New logo, Battery performance, UNIQUE DESIGN, top notch camera, waterproof, why dual when you can go Quad... go in to the market with a bang and bigger bang with it's prices. Start cranking AT&T and Tmobile, Verizon and Sprint from now in the U.S. chop chop you have work to do...
I wish you the best of luck SONY and hope to see interesting phones coming from your end.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

lov2bugu, you said things the exact way I wanted to express them! It was like watching me talking to a SONY’s CEO.
I don’t really think they are not aware of the problems. SONY used to be the 27th largest company in the world, according to Forbes. They are now at the 456th place!!
They are aware of their problems and I think, the move to buy the remaining stocks from Ericsson, is a move to bounce back into the market. They found the right time, where the stock is too low and the economics around the globe don’t look promising enough. I have to recognize them, all the bad phases they went into this year … hacking attack, loss of their factory in London, global economic climate etc.
But these are not excuses good enough not to produce quality, reliable and technologically advanced goods. I think that SONY is not to blame for the bad course SE has had. I think this is what SONY wants to revert. They want to “embody” all their technology … BRAVIA engines (TV Tech), Walkman and Cybershot tech (using Carl Zeiss lenses), VAIO (Comp tech) and finally PS3. Ericsson tried to integrate them, unsuccessfully.
Overall, I thing SONY, did not have or did not attempt to have the control of SE, hence, the answer you got back from SONY “… anything related to SE must be posted on the website of SE”. I think they will bounce. Just give ‘em some time. I’m willing to give them time, but not too much though. Just because I’ve always loved this brand!

Adobe flash don't work in lion

adobe flash don't work in lion

I Already tried that. Even tried uninstall and reinstall! Ialso tried uninstall and reinstall of reader then uninstall and reinstall of flash. There is another display quirk with Lion , if I let my mbp go to sleep without logging out or shutting down, I get the last screen frozen. I have to use the curser to erase the area where the login icon is, then I can enter the login pw and get the mbp to be functional again! There are a number of other display related sizes and parameters that randomly happen since lion was installed. UNSTABLE is a good description here !

I just installed the latest iMovie 10.0.2. Please don't say "look at the help menu" - it doesn't help. This is radically different than the version I'd been using. For starters it automatically converts to mp4 rather than .mov - that's my 1st question

Sorry for the long headline - I'm new to the support community and thought that was the post! I've been happily using my old version of iMovie - I don't even know the number - I guess it was 11? I just installed the most recent 10.0.2 and it is radically different from what I've been using. For starters, whereas my uploaded video used to be in the lower section, and I would edit up above, now it's reversed. Whereas I used to click on the transitions and drag a blur or whatever to my movie right while I was editing, now it's on a different screen. And the easy old Export file button is gone, where you could choose setting, file size, export as Quicktime movie - all gone - now it converts to mp4 and I STILL can't figure out how to get it back to .mov
Please don't say "read the Help manual" - I tried - there's nothing there about any of this. And by the way, I'm not a techie - I taught myself what I needed to know about the old iMovie and am now lost so please no snarks. I would appreciate any help.

Select in browser your movie, click Export on toolbar, choose iTunes, QT etc. then choose size of your file in opening window. And then click Export in this window.

Adobe, please don't kill Dreamweaver !

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for