Adobe: Please offer a middle-ground option for CC

I've used Adobe CS Production Premium for years, and currently own the CS6 version. After the first year, the cost of CC will be $50/mo for the ENTIRE Adobe collection. This is a bad cost proposition for me, as I only use the products currently in the Production Premium suite. So the cost will be $600 per year for many products I don't use (recent Production Premium upgrades have been $399/year), and once I stop paying I lose access to the software.
Could we have a middle ground, say a "CC Production Premium" for $30/mo after the first year?

I agree. The full subscription CC is too expensive when you only use a few applications (like most of us do). The CS options were cheaper, in my case it will be double the price now compared to the annual upgrade price of my production premium suite. With CC, at the moment it's all or nothing, for me that will be nothing, sorry.

Similar Messages

Receiving Error : Please set the Receivables system options for this operating unit and ensure that the MO: Operating Unit profile option is correctly set with an operating unit that is set up in Receivables. while trying to create a new Customer.

Hi All,
We have set up a new Operating Unit in Oracle Apps. Now when I am trying to create a new Customer in that Operating Unit, I am receiving following error:
ERROR MESSAGE:-Please set the Receivables system options for this operating unit and ensure that the MO: Operating Unit profile option is correctly set with an operating unit that is set up in Receivables.
We do have MO: Operating Unit and MO: Default Operating Unit set properly at Responsibility level for the Responsibility through which I am accessing this form.
Your help is appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
SKA

You can refer this thread and check your MO operating unit is set or not https://community.oracle.com/message/3937028 thanks

Please, 1. Please set the Receivables system options for this operating

hi
please i have this error:
1. Please set the Receivables system options for this operating unit and ensure that the MO: Operating Unit profile option is correctly set with an operating unit that is set up in Receivables.
can some one help me!
thinks

think you a lot mister.
i am not the administrator of the base, our base administrator is not here for the moment, i have just the count apps and sqplus to change parameters.
and the request :
select fnd_profile.value('SO_ORGANIZATION_ID') from dual ;
gives as result : 101!
think you for all!.
Message was edited by:
brahim37

Please add LED turn OFF option for DL2100

If there is an option for LED turn off on EX2, why can't it be on DL2100, since it's basically the same OS ?Please add this option on this device, thank you !

Hi Rahul,
Which release of Oracle Applications are you on?
Regards,
Mohammed

Why doesn't the customer support menu-driven system offer an "opt-out" option for cases where none of the available options meets the customer's need?

I have called customer support several times to get problems with my service plan corrected. None of the menu-driven options meets my needs, but the system does not offer a way to connect to a live rep. The only way to get to a live rep is to hit the "invalid selection" O key several times. Good customer service would include an "opt-out" choice.

I'm sorry to learn that our phone system does not include an option for your specific concerns Windy1040! I can address all Verizon Wireless issues! How can I help you?
AntonioC_VZW
Follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/VZWSupport

Safari did not offer an open in option for PDF file

I went to Safari and went to a web based PDF file and selected the icon that brought up the list of options that did not include open in. Do I need to do something to get Safari to include that in the list?
Thank you.

This document may help:
http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-2532

I have been trying to open journal articles and I keep getting the message "An add-on has failed for this website. Please check your internet security options for possible conflicts. Does anyone know what this is talking about or how to fix it?

I have tried going into manage add-ons and also my internet security options but I can't figure out the problem.

Hi mumshi5,
The article you are trying to open is the PDF document. Are you able to open that article/journal in other browser?
You can try different browser, also let me know which application or service of Adobe you are using ?
Regards,
Ajlan Huda.

Why Has Adobe Removed The Option For Individuals To Purchase Software And Not Use The Cloud?

As an individual who has been using Adobe products for about 25 years for my personal use and not as a business, I find the new policy of "renting" the software and using "The Cloud" for, at least in my case, a prohibitive monthly fee, to be totally unacceptable and will result in my no longer being able to afford using Adobe products. I do not understand why Adobe cannot offer their new cloud program for individuals and companies that may wish to use the new system and have the resources to pay in perpertuity, but they should also have the option for those of us who would rather purchase upgrades for whatever programs we use and keep them on our computer without "The Cloud" service.
I am 67 years old and living on a fixed income. I basically use four adobe programs... Photoshop, Premiere, After Effects, and Audition as I do volunteer work at a local non-profit radio and tv organization. If I were to "rent" those individually it would cost $80 per month... so I could take the next deal and get access to all software for $50 per month... I cannot afford either of those. If I could upgrade one or more of the programs every two or three years... keeping them on my computer and not using "The Cloud," then continuing to use the products would be doable. However, being forced into a program that requires a monthly fee and use of "The Cloud" which I do not need to use, seems totally unfair. I certainly understand that there are businesses and individuals who will love the new program, but why not have the option? Or perhaps a "Senior" discount as you do for educators and students?
Something to think about. It seems Adobe may be moving to the "Cable Television" model of monthly fees that will go no where but up.

Hey there, you may have heard that Adobe is continuing to sell and support CS6 for customers who prefer traditional licensing. It's last year's version instead of the latest-and-greatest CC release, but it's something to consider if that's important to you.
As far as a "senior discount" on Adobe software, there has never been one – but one thing to consider is becoming a student or teacher because there is no age restriction on that, in which case you may become eligible for education discounts.
Hope this helps.

Feature Request: Please make a 5.0 (5.1 without woofer) option for surrou

Hello Creative,
please make an 5.0 option for your soundcards. There are still some people out there with high-end speaker systems. "These" people don't need a subwoofer, because they have full range front speakers (40hz -20khz +-3 db and at 30 hz -6 db). Most surround reci'vers have a bass management where you can redirect the LFE ( the ./"effect channel"/the subwoofer)to the fronts. So pls implement an LFE to front redirection into your drivers for audigy and x-fi, I think this can't be too difficult, because there are 4.0 and 2.0 option available.
That is possible with my cheap onboard soundcard :-), so please show that creative is still the captain :-).
It's no fun when you can't use your center speaker in games because of that.Message Edited by mjusik on -27-2005 03:54 PM

I think there is no problem in doing that yourself. As LFE is currently only used by DVD Movies, (and EAX 5.0, if the developer implements that specific part), you only need to do redirection with your AC-3 decoder. If you download AC3Filter, you can use a matrix to say where every signal should go, essentially doing the redirection process you speak about.

Local Sync option for LR mobile

I want to ask Adobe to provide a local sync option between LR and LR Mobile. Going through the cloud each time is both slow and wasteful.
I, like many other have a monthly limit on my data allowance for uploading and downloading, synching through the cloud all the time uses up this allowance, additionally it is slow, it took me about 8 hrs to sync 1500 pics.
Please provide a local sync option for IPad, either by cable, or preferably, Local WIFI or even bluetooth.
Stop the waste and make it faster.
Regards

I have the same problem, unfortunately. I've tried all above.
Lightroom version: 5.4 [955652]
Operating system: Mac OS 10
Version: 10.9 [2]
Application architecture: x64
Logical processor count: 8
Processor speed: 3,4 GHz
Built-in memory: 32768,0 MB
Real memory available to Lightroom: 32768,0 MB
Real memory used by Lightroom: 323,0 MB (0,9%)
Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 942,0 MB
Memory cache size: 81,7 MB
Maximum thread count used by Camera Raw: 4
Displays: 1) 2560x1440
Application folder: /Applications
Library Path: /Users/hans/Pictures/Lightroom/Vrij Werk/Vrij Werk.lrcat
Settings Folder: /Users/hans/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Lightroom
Installed Plugins:
1) Behance
2) ColorChecker Passport
3) HDR Efex Pro 2
4) rc Raw Plus Jpeg
Config.lua flags: None

Available HTTP delivery options for Flash Access encrypted content

Dear colleagues,
Could you please clarify available HTTP delivery options for Flash Access encrypted content.
Standard HTTP DS scheme with Apache web server getting chunks of video from segmented with f4fpackager file.
HTTP Progressive Download of encrypted with Flash Access file (non segmented).
Is it possible to use byte range delivery in this case in order to start playback from custom position (seek)?
Are there any pitfalls in this case? Is it required to make encryption blocks aligned with keyframe intervals or something like that?

Thanks for your response, seems though that only the encrypted videos appear to have a problem because when I tried some un-encrypted videos (again from adobe http://drmtest.adobe.com/content/unencrypted/Indesign.f4v ) it played fine.
Maybe is has something to do with the decryption process and the hardware of the mobile phone after all.
Again thanks for your response.

Why are the options for "When Firefox starts" NOT clickable in Firefox 5? I want to choose "Windows and tabs that where opened last time you accessed the net" but Firefox won't let me.

In the previous version of Firefox one could choose to save tabs so that when Firefox opened, all the tabs from the previous sessions appeared. This was done in Settings > Options > General > Startup. In the menu for the "When Firefox Starts" one had the option for "Windows and tabs that where opened last time you accessed the net." in Firefox 5.0, this menu is gray and not clickable. Help, please?

''Why are the options for "When Firefox starts" NOT clickable in Firefox 5?"
Possibly you are not saving your "browsing history" which is what the session history is tied into.
'''Not saving History''' -- check your settings for '''Tools > options > Privacy'''', make sure you are not clearing more than just cache in "Settings for Clearing History"
* http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/4928/clearcachew.png
* clearing your history at end of session, cache is the only one you would want to clear at end of session, if you don't want to lose things
There are several things that are related to private browsing and not saving History
* Private Browsing Ctrl+Shift+P
* You selected "Never remember history" in first drop-down of Tools > Options Privacy and all of the check marks disappear (See picture above)
* "Permanent private browsing mode" was check-marked under "Use custom settings for history" in the first drop-down of Tools > options > Privacy (see picture above)

Ignore Update Option For App Store?

Software Update for the Mac offers the "ignore update" option for an unwanted update. Is there a similar mechanism in the app store to ignore an update and remove the annoying badge promts?

... I'm running Snow Leopard. Is it possible this feature is only available in Lion?
I had to boot a Snow Leopard system to be certain but sure enough, it's there:
This is the "purchases" tab though.
If you have the grey "X" in "Purchases", see if hiding the purchase will also hide its available updates. I cannot verify this since I have no available updates at the moment.

Please ask Adobe to re-think upgrade options for Suite owners

I have sent emails, called and tweeted this same message and I hope you will too:
Adobe please stop locking us into Suites. Please let us upgrade from a suite to an individual product if we choose.
I own CS3 Design Standard and I only want PS CS5 and AI CS5. I don't need all the other programs that come with the suite and I can save over $100 by purchasing them separately at upgrade prices.
As it stands now, I will not be upgrading to CS5 because of this policy--it is too expensive.
If you are in the same position, please let Adobe know that they are losing sales due to this policy.

BobLevine wrote:
I disagree with you but I understand your feelings. This has been discussed since Adobe introduced the suites in 2003.
If you have a CS3 suite, you might want to read through this article on my website which might help you save a few bucks on the suite upgrade.
http://www.theindesignguy.com/purchase-advice.shtml
If you don't feel like reading the whole thing, scroll down to the "What's the Bottom Line?" section.
Bob
Although I am not personally interested in updating a single program from a suite, I believe it could be in Adobe's best interest to do so.
Adobe could handle a single or two 'suite' program update to the individual programs in exactly the same way they handle a cross platform exchange/upgrade, i.e. one relinquishes all claim to the original suite by certifying that it has been destroyed and is issued the 'upgrade' in a full package. With a single program or even a two program 'upgrade' of this sort from the 'suite' of programs Adobe would have income they may not otherwise receive and the customer is happy. If it were a three or more single program upgrade then updating the suite would generally be cheaper--as it should be--that's what suites were designed for.
I agree that updating without relinquishing the original suite is not in Adobe's best interest for several reasons.

I purchased Lightroom 5 and Elements 12 and installed them on a computer. I now have a new computer, and wish to install them on the new one. When I tried to do so, my only option seemed to be Adobe Cloud. When I was asked for my LR serial number, it was

I purchased Lightroom 5 and Elements 12 and installed them on a computer. I now have a new computer, and wish to install them on the new one. When I tried to do so, my only option seemed to be Adobe Cloud. When I was asked for my LR serial number, it was not accepted. Please help me install these two products; I prefer stand-alone, rather than a monthly fee. Thank you

PSE 10, 11, 12 - http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop-elements/kb/photoshop-elements-10-11-downloads.html
PE 10, 11, 12 - http://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-elements/kb/premiere-elements-10-11-downloads.html
Lightroom - all versions
Windows
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=113&platform=Windows
Mac
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=113&platform=Macintosh

Adobe: Please offer a middle-ground option for CC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for