Adobe (Premiere & After Effects) on MacPro

Dear Apple support,
I currently own a late 2009 iMac 27".
I studied & using Adobe After Effects & Premiere Pro.
I'm seriously considering to buy the MacPro !
However: I am seeing a lot of talks in forums about problematic issues with the MacPro & Adobe.
1. For example, see this discussion:  https://forums.adobe.com/message/7489619
To quote from the forum discussion:
     "I'm very disappointed with Apple lately. Ever since they pulled out of exhibiting at the NAB Show, it seems they've been neglecting the needs of professional      users. They took too long to refresh the Mac Pro line and, when they finally did refresh it, it was more to the benefit of hobbyists than professionals in studio      environments"
     and
     "more and more people are jumping to Windows. Windows 7 is rock solid for using Adobe software. I love it. You get more processing power for your money      with a PC and several companies are building very quality machines these days. Until Apple makes some changes, I'll recommend a PC workstation over a      Mac Pro"
Now, I love Apple, and I don't believe everything I read, but,
I assume that you guys are aware that there are many other discussions of this sort ?
2. I also contacted Adobe's support.  I asked their support engineer, what would he buy? a MacPro or a PC.
He's reply was: "I'll go with Windows, Windows 7"
Would it be possible to hear directly from you (Apple support) what exactly the situation is with Adobe's products?
What is the present situation? and, what is going to happen in the future?
I own & love several Apple's products, and I'm very interested in the MacPro.
However, there are too many bad talks in the forums which are making me scared to invest in a MacPro (it's not cheap for me)
I'm really confused !
Hoping to hear back a detailed & honest answer.
Sincerely,
Tal Mor

You are not talking to Apple Support when you post on this Apple User-to-User forum. Apple makes no promise to read these postings, and never responds here unless your post goes unanswered for several days.
Your question should be directed at Adobe, not Apple. Apple has provided good Hardware, and made a serious commitment to OpenCL. Final Cut X takes advantage of both.
Despite Adobe's public promises to take advantage of the new Mac Pro Hardware, they have been very slow at delivering software that takes advantage of the features of the new cylinder Mac Pro and developing OpenCL versions of their software. Adobe seems to prefer the proprietary approach provided by NVIDIA CUDA.

Similar Messages

  • Laptop for editing with Adobe Premiere & After Effects CS6

    Hi, I'm just started a company working with young people, and I need a laptop for editing some videos (short films/music videos).
    I was looking at a cheap laptop to be able to run Adobe Premiere and After Effects smoothly. I was told that this laptop would run smoothly:
    http://www.pcworld.co.uk/gbuk/hp-envy-m6-1178sa-15-6-laptop-17419990-pdt.html
    Can anyone confirm this? The graphics card is not listed on the Adobe's website but I was told it's compatible?
    Im new to this stuff so please help, thank you.

    How realistic are the system requirements Adobe posts on their site?
    System requirements
    Windows
    Intel® Pentium® 4 or AMD Athlon® 64 processor with 64-bit support; Intel Core®2 Duo or AMD Phenom® II processor required for Adobe® Premiere® Pro, After Effects®, and Encore®; Intel Core i7 processor required for Adobe SpeedGrade™
    Microsoft® Windows® 7 with Service Pack 1 (64 bit) and Windows® 8. Refer to the CS6 FAQ for more information about Windows 8 support.*
    2GB of RAM (4GB recommended) for 32 bit; 4GB of RAM (8GB recommended) for 64 bit
    14.5GB of available hard-disk space for installation; additional free space required during installation (cannot install on removable flash storage devices)
    Additional disk space required for disk cache, preview files, and other working files (10GB recommended)
    1280x900 display with 16-bit color and 512MB of VRAM; 1680x1050 display required, and second professionally calibrated viewing display recommended for SpeedGrade
    OpenGL 2.0–capable system
    Sound card compatible with ASIO protocol or Microsoft WDM/MME
    DVD-ROM drive compatible with dual-layer DVDs (DVD+-R burner for burning DVDs; Blu-ray burner for creating Blu-ray Disc media)
    Java™ Runtime Environment 1.6 (included)
    Eclipse™ 3.7 (for plug-in installation of Adobe Flash® Builder®); the following distributions are supported: Eclipse IDE for Java EE and Java Developers, Eclipse Classic, Eclipse for PHP Developers
    QuickTime 7.6.6 software required for QuickTime features, multimedia, and HTML5 media playback
    Dedicated GPU card required for SpeedGrade (for optimal performance in SpeedGrade and for GPU-accelerated features in Adobe Premiere Pro and After Effects: NVIDIA Quadro 4000, 5000, or 6000 or other Adobe-certified GPU card with at least 1GB of VRAM recommended); visit www.adobe.com/products/premiere/extend.html for supported cards
    Optional: Tangent CP200 family or Tangent Wave control surface for SpeedGrade
    Optional: For SDI output, NVIDIA Quadro SDI Output card required for SpeedGrade
    Optional: 7200 RPM hard drive (multiple fast disk drives, preferably RAID 0 configured, recommended) for video products
    This software will not operate without activation. Broadband Internet connection and registration are required for software activation, validation of subscriptions, and access to online services.† Phone activation is not available.
    You have to be from another world to believe these requirements. Note the last optional statement. Up to and including CS4 this stated:
    Dedicated 7200 RPM hard drive (multiple fast disk drives, preferably RAID 0 configured) for video products.
    Nobody in his right mind believes that system requirements get lower over time. It is purely a marketing lie to artificially lure prospective buyers.
    The requirement to have two physical disks for CS6 is bogus.
    If anything is bogus, it is the system requirements from Adobe and only fools would try to use a system with these minimum requirements, like this:
    Pentium 4 with 4 GB of RAM, 24.5 GB of hard disk space is enough according to them.
    Harm is confusing editing with getting high PPBM scores, I am afraid - again.  Not all projects have 10 layers of H.264 stacked with heavy effects for two hours straight.  The vast majority of editing is simple transitions and effects with 10 minutes of YouTube encoding twice a week.
    Wrong assumption. I was thinking of a simple DV timeline with one single track. And however much you dislike the PPBM benchmark, it is the only available tool to show how well a system is setup and in balance. Question: Is your dislike of the benchmark based on the fact that your favorite HP Z820 does not do well?

  • Adobe premiere/after effects transition style help ?

    hey everyone i was watching this video http://vimeo.com/26996933
    im wondering
    1st is how he in tilting down in the shot but it jumps from one part of the shot to the other. 2nd one is when it sort of shakes and blurs.Hopefully someone can tell me what there called so i can find tutorials on how to do them  ?
    thanks
    cam

    It looks like a video co pilot twitch to me, with precise keyframing and camera crane moves. Email the user and politely ask him how he achieved that.

  • What is your Premiere, After Effects and SpeedGrade Workflow?

    Hi Everyone,
    I am an experienced editor who's switched to Adobe's CC barely a year ago. At the moment I'm in the midst of finishing up a corporate project and trying to think of the best workflow between Premiere, After Effects and SpeedGrade. I'm loving the Dynamic Link workflows, but at the some time I'm facing some obstacles, and am wondering how you guys do your work.
    Let's say I finished the edit of the project and send the project via Dynamic Link to SG. I finish the grade and then decide to use the Dynamic Link to AE to add some titles with shapes and effects such as Fast Blur. This is where I'm facing the first problem. When I choose a clip to be 'Replaced with an AE Composition', the color correction is gone, and now if I grade in SG, it will naturally grade the titles I added. So, it seems as though my color grade is a waste of time and I have to do it the old school way of first absolutley completing the color grade, exporting, re-importing and then heading for titles and effects. That makes you lose quite a bit of "dynamics" in your work (and time aka money), if my clients want changes for example.
    For simple animations with text, and shapes, this is not a big issue since you could easily add the titles to a second Video track. But when you use After Effects which changes the acutal image of a clip by adding effects, things don't work out too easily. But in any case, these might just be the limitations to the relativley new Dynamic Link workflow.
    In my specific example, how would you go about it? What is your workflow? Maybe I'm missing out on some tips & tricks.
    Be happy to hear from you guys and maybe get some expert knowledge.
    Best,
    fabian

    Hey there,
    I'm also looking for a solid workflow solution since adopting (and actually really liking) Speedgrade.  So below is what I'm going to try which should work and will follow this thread to see if any other workflows pop up.  Also typing this out here to help me with plan of attack
    Project Specs - 3 minute corporate video with text animation, interviews, broll, and computer screen replacement
    Edit in Premiere
    Dynamic link to SpeedGrade for color correction
    Open back up in Premiere, confirm all color corrections are applied, and then duplicate sequence to an AE Prep extension
    In AE prep sequence, take all AE "base" shots (for computer screen composite or anything needing stabilization) up onto their own track (i.e. V5 & V6)
    Add 10 frame handles to in & out, checkerboard clips as needed
    Delete all other remaining content but keep blank spaces / no ripple deletes
    Export this out to a ProRes4444 QT movie
    Import ProRes4444 QT movie back into premiere, add over existing video layers in AE Prep extension sequence, and then there time out the screen shot replacement content to cover effect duration
    Dynamic link AE Prep Premiere Pro sequence to AE
    Do the AE work
    Dynamic link back to Premiere
    DoneHopefully
    This was my similar work around back in the day before I had Automatic Duck in FCP to AE
    Hope this helps anyone else - if there are any glaring "why would you do all that" points - please let me know   I'll also report back if there are any horrible roadblocks throughout the process.
    _Christina

  • CS5 Premiere, After Effects, and Encore hang on splash screen - Solution

    I just installed Production Premium CS5 on a Windows 7 64 bit system. The install went without a hitch, but when I attempted to start Premiere, After Effects or Encore, they would all hang at some place with the splash screen showing. I spent 2 hours on the phone with Adobe and they never solved the problem. They had me uninstall iTunes and Quicktime, upgrade my nVidea driver and upgrade to a newer version of Quicktime. None of this made a difference and at that point I realized they were not going to fix my problem. The first woman was an idiot and the guy I spoke to next was a lot better, but no solution. Premiere was hanging when loading the Quicktime plug-ins.
    Then I had an Aha! moment. I shut off User Account Control, rebooted and then everything worked. I could also get the programs to work with UAC on if I changed the shortcut to "Run as Administrator" but then there would be a UAC prompt. By the way, I was running as a user with full administrator privileges.
    I am astounded that Adobe has never encountered this problem before and did not have an immediate solution. Once again, Adobe Tech Support has continued to provide pathetic tech support.
    Steve

    The plug-ins that were involved in the hang on the splash screen were:
    ExporterQuickTimeHost.prm
    ImporterQuickTime.prm
    The splash screen would hang for 5 minutes on each of these and then if PPro started it would only be a plain white window with the Menu Bar and then there would be no further response.

  • Premiere, After Effects, SpeedGrade Not Available

    I do not have premiere, after effects, or speedgrade as an available option for downloading.  My Adobe Application Manager only displays 13 available downloads.

    Hi,
    If you are using 32-bit machine then it will not be available.
    These apps are avaialble for 64 bit machines only.
    Thanks and regards
    Harshit yadav

  • Is Motion similar to Adobe's After Effects?

    Hi,
    Is Motion similar to Adobe's After Effects?
    thanks
    NBK

    NBK2 wrote:
    Hi,
    Is Motion similar to Adobe's After Effects?
    In terms of what a final product might look like, produced from either, they are similar.
    In terms of HOW they function - there are many differences.
    Search this forum for "After Effects". The topic has been covered here repeatedly. You should find plenty of info.

  • Is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M in the new MacBook Pro supported by Adobe for Premiere & After Effects

    As the title states.
    Is it worth getting the 15" MacBook Pro with the Nvidia graphics card over the 15" version without for use with both Premiere Pro & After Effects CC?
    Thanks

    Chrisstockwell wrote:
    As the title states.
    Is it worth getting the 15" MacBook Pro with the Nvidia graphics card over the 15" version without for use with both Premiere Pro & After Effects CC?
    Thanks
    Unfortunately, I've found that many of the users here are PC users. While they are helpful, it's rare to get anything beyond guesses for Adobe Premiere CC performance on Macs.
    I've noticed that the list of "supported" GPU's is not updated all that much by Adobe. It took a while after last year's macs were released for that list to be updated with those GPUs. But the 750M has 2GB VRAM and pretty much any GPU with 1GB of VRAM or more can take advantage of the Mercury Playback Engine on Premiere CC (http://blogs.adobe.com/premierepro/2013/06/adobe-premiere-pro-cc-and-gpu-support.html)  With CS6, if your card isn't on the "list" you could add it using that hack that people talk about but you don't have to worry about that with CC as the above link explains.
    While the regular 15" Macbook with the integrated graphics card is probably good enough to edit w/ Premiere CC, I don't think you'll be able to take advantage of any GPU acceleration because of the lack of a dedicated GPU with 1GB of VRAM. I am running Premiere CC on an iMac with an AMD GPU that isn't on the list, but does have 1GB of VRAM so I can take advantage of gpu accleration (however, while it's smoother than "software only", it definitely has it's REALLY annoying issues). I'm sure it'd be better with a newer NVIDIA card (from what I've read anyway) but like you, it's hard to get feedback from many people on these forums who use macs.
    Hope this helps. I for one would go with the 750M. It's more $$$, but I'm guessing it'll be worth it. Just a guess though. I wish someone with that laptop (or even a 2013 iMac with similar GPU) would chime in with their thoughts.

  • Dual-core or Quad-core for Premiere, After Effects, and Photoshop CS4?

    We are planning to purchase around 25 computers for a computer lab for working with CS4 Production Premium at the high school level.  Mainly Premiere Pro, After Effects, and Photoshop.  Our budget is, unfortunately, a mere $550-$625 per machine (just the tower though, we have monitors).  I've already established that a 64-bit operating system makes a significant difference in the performance, even though Photoshop is the only 64-bit application, and I'm now hung up on whether or not it's worth the cost of a quad-core processor over a dual-core.
    I'm discovering the different hardware needs for each application, so I'm trying to find an economic balance that will give me the best performance per buck.  It seems that Premiere benefits significantly from more cores (we're editing 1440x1080 AVCHD), and this article over at Tom's Hardware has convinced me that I don't want to compromise with a hyperthreaded dual-core for After Effects.
    I'm also struggling with what part the graphics card plays in the mix.  Which applications lean on the graphics card, and will it make much difference as long as I meet the requirements (OpenGL 2.0, Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D 10, and 256 Mb Ram)?
    I understand I will need to settle for less-than-awesome with my budget, but I'm already making sacrifices to get the number to $625.  I would like to make sure that those sacrifices will be worth it for a quad-core system.

    I think I may have answered my own question by looking at these charts over at Tom's Hardware:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2009-desktop-cpu-charts-update-1/Adobe-Premiere-Pro-CS4 ,1404.html
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2009-desktop-cpu-charts-update-1/Adobe-Photoshop-CS-4,1 387.html
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/desktop-cpu-charts-2010/Video-Editing-Adobe-After-Effec ts-CS5,2427.html
    I  think that the jump to the quad core in Premiere Pro is worth it, even if I  don't see as large of an improvement in Photoshop or After Effects.  I am still interested in the role of the graphics card in the mix if anyone can shed some light on that.  Will an integrated graphics card (like an Intel GMA x4500 or Radeon HD4200) suffice or will I need an actual graphics card to realize the benefits?
    Thanks

  • Premiere & After Effects in Creative Cloud Packager

    Why can't I find Premiere or After Effects in Creative Cloud Packager? Neither are listed.
    ~Shawn

    Hi Blaz Bertoncelj
    May be due to your operating system.
    The following doc may help - Not all apps displayed for download | Creative Cloud desktop app, Adobe Application Manager
    Thanks
    Bev

  • Help with Premiere, After Effects and Davinci workflow

    Hi
    I'm scratching my head wondering how I'm going to solve this workflow issue that I have, but hopefully it isn't that much of an issue.
    We have shot a short film with an A-cam that delivers CinemaDNG files. I converted these files into Apple ProRes 422 Proxy with Davinci Resolve 9 Lite
    and then I imported the proxy files into Adobe Premiere CC. The idea is to then to > edit the film in Premiere > import it to After Effects CC  via Dynamic Link (to make the effects we're after) > send it back to Premiere > export as XML to Davinci > relink to the original CinemaDNG-files and perform the color grading, and then finally export the film (either back to premiere to export it with audio or export it directly from Davinci in some way?)
    I'm new to all this and I would really appreciate help!
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Patrik

    Hi guys and thanks for your replies!
    Well I thought I had a good post prod plan, but now I realized it maybe wasn't that good when AE gets involved.
    My initial idea was to follow this workflow tutorial > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpg0k3aD088#t=327 (He have now made this tutorial private and I'm having a hard time remembering my YouTube password so at the moment I can't watch it... great)
    CC may not specifically support A-CAM's CinemaDNG files, but it will do for a rough cut, even though it looks purple and horrible
    What do you think about this? I import the cinemadng folders into premiere and make a rough cut out of it, then I'll export the sequence as a XML file and bring it into Davinci where I relink to the cinemadng files and perform the color grading and then export it as 422 HQ (for example?) and then bring it back to Premiere to make my final edit and also use Dynamic Link with After Effects? Any possible failures with that technique?
    Regards
    Patrik
    Ps: Reason why I'd like to perform color grading in Davinci and not Speed Grade is because of the purple tint I get in SG and PP!

  • Premiere-After Effects Dynamic Link render times vary wildly after minimal composition changes

    Here is something strange that happens a lot to me.
    I'll have a sequence in Premiere Pro CC 2014 that is entirely or largely an AE comp that I have dynamically linked.  I'll use a specific case as an example, but it's happened with various projects.
    In this most recent one the visual (but not audio) of my Premiere sequence is one AE dynamically linked comp of about 90 seconds.  It's more or less a fancy slide show- some photos with moves, some text, motion blur, masking, maybe a few filters.  Fairly basic stuff as far as After Effects goes.
    Anyhow, I like to render the sequence in Premiere and then watch it down with music to see if the timing works and make adjustments from there.  That's my usual workflow.  The strange thing is that when I render, the render times can vary tremendously.  With this particular project, one time rendered in about 2 minutes in Premiere.  I watched it down and I noticed a spelling error, which I fixed.  Just changing one word of text in AE.  This, of course, causes the entire linked comp to need to be rendered again in Premiere.  This time when I go to render, it took about 20 minutes and it only got about  70% of the way through.  A huge difference and all I changed was a couple letters, which shouldn't impact how intensive of a render is needed.  What I usually do is cancel the render when it takes that long, then quit Premiere, reopen, and render right away after I open.  When I do this, after the application restart, the sequence will then render in the faster approximately 2 minute duration.  Almost invariably this is true.
    So I end up quitting and restarting Premiere a lot to get the faster render times.  But of course that's annoying.
    What is going on here?
    I know that some might have critiques of the workflow and watching in Premiere and the fact that one letter change forces the entire sequence re-render.  I know I could break it up and there are ways around that.  But I am not interested in such critiques.  My work flow actually is quite efficient when the 2 minute render time happens.  Just not when it takes 10x more than that for the same thing.  Why are there these huge render time swings?
    My guess is that some cache gets filled up, so when the application is just started, and the cache is empty, the render works much better.  But I really do not know.
    Help please.

    There is currently a bug that causes Dynamic Link performance to be poor when the main After Effects application is running. (The underlying issue is that the main After Effects application is sending many more messages during Dynamic Link than it needs to.)
    The easy workaround is to quit the main After Effects application when using Premiere Pro to process a dynamically linked After Effects composition.
    This bug is fixed in an update due to be released in less than two weeks.

  • Looking to buy new MacBook Pro for editing with Premiere/After Effects, but wondering about trade-off between Processor Speed and Graphics Card

    I'm a professional video editor (using Premiere and After Effects) looking to buy a new MacBook Pro and am deciding between two models. The slightly older model has a 2.8GHZ i7 (3rd generation) Quad Core processor with a 1GB SDRAM of NVIDIA GE FORCE GT 650M Graphics Card. Then newer model has a 2.3GHZ i7 (4th generation) Quad Core preocessor with 2GB SDRAM of NVIDIA GE FORCE 750M/Intel Iris Pro Graphics Card.
    Which makes the most difference (processor speed vs. graphics card) with editing with Premiere and After Effects?
    Any help/guidance would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!
    mike

    Poikkeus wrote:
    1. Your MBP will be somewhat slower than your iMac, as reflected in the general speed; desktop Macs have more RAM and storage.
    You recon? If he get's the 17", he would have up to 8x more RAM, 4 x more GPU,, and  a bit faster CPU;.
    2. Be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of extra RAM. Loading up the slot will make juggling multiple applications easier, like Photoshop, VLC, and Safari. However, more than 4gigs of RAM will make loading your MBP on startup twice as slow - at least a minute, probably longer. That's why a MBP user with extra RAM should sleep their machine nearly always when not in use, rather than powering off. 
    I did not know this, I just upgraded from 4gb to 8gb the other day. Have not noticed it being slower, but I don't often shut it down. It's nice to not even have to bother with ifreemem.
    3. Additional storage and RAM will maximize the basic capabilities of your MBP, but you won't be able to make a 2.3ghz machine any faster than it already is.
    SSD
    4. I still feel that your iMac will be faster than your prospective MBP. The only way to dramatically increase the speed would be the installation of a SSD drive (like the lauded OWC series). But they're not cheap.
    I don't want to rain on your parade, but want you to get a more realistic idea of your performance.
    I chose a macbook pro, 17" of cause. I use it for gaming. Yes a iMac is better for gaming. But, it's nice to be able to move around. Set up a man cave in the lounge 1 week, or in the bedroom, the next. But you fork out a lot more dosh for that luxury. And yes, not as much power as Poikkeus has said.

  • Adobe Photoshop/After Effects CS6 Error; Mac.

    Exit Code: 6
    Please see specific errors and warnings below for troubleshooting. For example,  ERROR: DF015, DW063 ...
    -------------------------------------- Summary --------------------------------------
    - 0 fatal error(s), 10 error(s), 0 warning(s)
    ----------- Payload: {4817D846-700B-474E-A31B-80892B3E92E3} Adobe After Effects CS6 11.0.0.0 -----------
    ERROR: DF015: Unable to delete symlink "/Applications/Adobe After Effects CS6/Adobe After Effects CS6.app/Contents/Frameworks/amtlib.framework/Resources"(Seq 1405)
    ERROR: DW063: Command ARKDeleteSymlinkCommand failed.(Seq 1405)
    ----------- Payload: {9124DF4E-617D-486B-A970-8FA632244F24} Adobe Photoshop CS6 Core 13.0.0.0 -----------
    ERROR: DF015: Unable to delete symlink "/Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS6/Adobe Photoshop CS6.app/Contents/Frameworks/amtlib.framework/Resources"(Seq 524)
    ERROR: DW063: Command ARKDeleteSymlinkCommand failed.(Seq 524)
    ERROR: DF014: Unable to recreate symlink at "/Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS6/Adobe Photoshop CS6.app/Contents/Frameworks/amtlib.framework/amtlib" with a target of ""(Seq 523)
    ERROR: DW063: Error rolling back command ARKDeleteSymlinkCommand(Seq 523)
    ERROR: DW050: The following payload errors were found during install:
    ERROR: DW050:  - Adobe Photoshop CS6 English Language Pack_AdobePhotoshop13-en_US: Install failed
    ERROR: DW050:  - Adobe After Effects CS6: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
    ERROR: DW050:  - Adobe Photoshop CS6 Core: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
    ERROR: DW050:  - Adobe After Effects CS6_AdobeAfterEffects11en_USLanguagePack: Install failed
    PLEASE HELP ME. :C

    Do you have any previous versions installed or a beta version of the software?  If so please try removing them and installing again.
    If you wish to identify the exact root cause of your difficulties then please review your installation logs in their entirety.  You can find directions on how to accomplish this at Troubleshoot with install logs | CS5, CS5.5, CS6 - http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/troubleshoot-install-logs-cs5-cs5.html.

  • Dynamic Link Premiere + After Effects - Encoder - Änderungen werden nicht übernommen.

    Wenn man bereits eine Sequenz (welche eine AE-Komp. beinhaltet) mit dem Media Encoder exportiert hat und dann nachträglich nochmals Änderungen der Komp. in After Effects vornimmt und dann die Sequenz wieder per Premiere an den Media Encoder sendet, dann werden die After Effects Änderungen nicht berücksichtigt. Die After Effects Komposition innerhalb der exportierten Sequenz ist auf dem Stand des ersten Exports. In der Timeline wird sie aber richtig dargestellt. Wenn man direkt aus Premiere exportiert und nicht den Weg über den Encoder nimmt, funktioniert es auch.
    Gibt es irgendwelchen temporären Dateien, die man löschen muss?

    Leider kein Lösung, nur dass es hier bei mir genauso ist. Scheint leider ein Mangel am Programm zu sein, ansonsten würde ich ich auch über eine Lösung freuen. Hält schon auf, wenn ich jede Sequenz einzeln rendern muss.
    Klar ich könnte das bei einzelnen Clips zur Not auch über den Media Encoder aus AE heraus machen, aber sinniger und besser wäre es schon wenn "dynamic link" auch wirklich dynamisch linken würde..

Maybe you are looking for