Adobe Should Offer Domain Registration

Adobe should offer domain registration so we can avoid haveing to re-direct the DNS servers.
Also, Adobe really, really needs telephone support for those rare problems we have with hosting.

Thank you. I have just renewed with my current domain registrar Thank you
for you prompt and direct answer to my question.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Sanjit_Das <[email protected]>

Similar Messages

Can I transfer my domain registration to Adobe Business Catalyst?

Can I transfer my domain registration to Adobe Business Catalyst?

Thank you. I have just renewed with my current domain registrar Thank you
for you prompt and direct answer to my question.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Sanjit_Das <[email protected]>

Reasons Adobe should write a migration manual from FH to AI

what my friend wrote me...
About FHMX, how about educating people why Freehand is so
much better than
ill, and publishing a migration guide from ill to Freehand.
Maybe you and I
can join Adobe and implement this program! As a matter of
fact I've already
written the introduction to the guide.
Top reasons why I love using Freehand MX over Illustrator for
the work we
do. Try it, and you'll like it too.
•Gouping and ungrouping is time consuming in ill. If an
object on the bottom
is grouped, the whole group is selected. Selecting the bottom
object is
useless unless you ungroup all. Very time consuming.
Freehand can select one element even if it's part of a group.
• It is common in ill & FHMX to hold down shift
while clicking on objects to
select several at a time. ill has a tendency to 'pick up'
& move those
objects as your moving from one to the other. Which means
having to back up
your last step and then continue.
•• ill select/same/stroke colour, fill colour
etc. VS FHMX 'find & replace'
In ill available only 'document wide' which forces you to
take the selection
and place it in a new document (usually a temporary measure
ill forces upon
you).
All this copying takes extra time when the art is complex.
Since changing colours is often the goal, opening a new
document means
having to drag into the new doc, all the colours you'll be
needing to
change.
Also when choosing same fill & stroke colour, ill doesn't
catch everything,
so you have to try several times to get everything.
FHMXs 'find & replace' runs on whatever you select,
without requiring
copying
the info to a new document, so there is no waiting like in
ill. And it
catches everything all in one shot. Wham, bam thank you maam.
FHMXs 'find &
replace' light years ahead of ill.
• Multiple page documents
FHMX multi page documents can be of different sizes and
orientation within a
single document. Ill must have the same size and orientation.
Ill allows only one page size & page format while FHMX
permits you to use
any combo within the same document, all with the click of a
button. Job's
done.
ill: go into doc setup and calculate new overall width.
"let's see I need 5 pages of 8.5x11 so that's 8.5" x 5 pages
=42.5" width.
If you add a page, all the doc info gets shifted off center.
Ill requires
you to select all, (make sure nothing is locked!) and
recenter all the
pages. All time consuming and unnecessary in FHMX.
Ill can't handle multiple pages when it come time to print
them all. In
order to be able to print an 8 page document with simple
vector art (without
any linked files) in illustrator, it was necessary to convert
the document
to 8 single page documents. Each page took 5 minutes , 40 min
total.
FHMX prints multiple page documents with no hesitation.
••ill has no collect for output. This is
ridiculous. FHMX enables you to
enjoy creating freely without having to think of where that
tiff you just
imported came from. When the art is finished in FH, click
'collect for
output' and in under 5 seconds a complete folder is created
of everything
you need to backup that artwork.
Never spend one second looking for anything again when
opening a freehand
document. Not today, not tomorrow, or in three months.
In ill, after the art is done, you need to spend the time
looking for those
linked files, to gather them into a folder. And when a
deadline is so
important, will you actually take the time? NO! So days,
weeks, or months
later, when you need to open the file and the tiff is
missing, well, I hope
you like treasure hunts, because with time tiffs can be moved
or go missing.
With this one feature, FH saves hours of time per year over
ill.
•Pathfinder/combine in ill is slow ad often crashes the
program. (See next
point) Freehand unite is Fast!. ill requires you to ungroup
all elements
before using the filter. FHMX doesn't.
••Paste inside.
FHMX enables you to use garment sketches without modifying
shapes to
accommodate a tiff pasted inside. Tons less work over ill.
'Paste inside' in
FHMX is fast & effortless, encouraging you to paste
inside each individual
shape of the garment. (Ex. Belt loops, waistband, pockets,
body. All get
their own tiff pasted inside.) This gives the artist freedom
over each
individual tiff. Changes can be applied in light/dark or
angle to each tiff
seperatly from one another.
Ill cannot do this without a massive investment in time, it
doesn't even
compare with the ease of FHMX. ill method is also a pain to
work with ,
requiring you to lock/unlock items as the masks bounding box
is often in the
way. This requires you to lock nearby elements in order
select. Very
annoying. This work around is so time consuming it
discourages you to paste
inside individual shapes. In fact it's impractical to do so.
You're forced
to combine all shapes and paste one tiff into this one
overall shape, which
is time consuming because it increase your workload to
achieve a lesser
result.
Ill requires you to draw a duplicate shape which must lie in
perfect
register with the shape underneath it. Shapes are often
composed of highly
complex components (ex:text) that need to be united into one
overall shape,
to paste into. Often these complex shapes crash illustrators
unite filter,
making the job time consuming or impossible. FHMX requires
none of this
workaround, because FHMX enables you to past into individual
shapes.
FHMX can even paste inside a paste inside, and in easily
accesible layers,
creating realistic effects. Don't even dream of doing this in
ill.
•ill toolbox. The 'Venus' girl at the top of the box is
often clicked in
error resulting in an annoying 'Adobe online' dialogue box
appearing. So
annoying! Bury this feature elsewhere, or at least move it
away from the two
arrow tools, the two most used tools of the whole program!
Stop interrupting
workflow!
•Ill locking unlocking frenzy
You'd like to add a point to a path. In FHMX, select the path
and click on
it
with the pen tool. You're done.
In ill, select the path and click on it with the pen tool +.
But ill adds
the point to the path in front, even though you selected the
one in back!
Ill forces you to lock the front path to get to the rear
path. If your
artwork has many layered paths, get ready to go on the usual
locking frenzy
until you get to the path you need. All this just to add a
point.
As an added bonus, ill often throws the "Can't add an anchor
point. Please
use the add anchor point tool on a segment of a path"
dialogue box in your
face, as if you can't aim a point on a path.
Paste inside
• Because paste inside in ill is so complicated, a
common workaround is to
create a pattern swatch to achieve the same ease as in FHMX.
However pattern
swatches are simple vector paths that can't match the
subtlety of a tiff.
When opening a new document, swatches have to be brought in
to the new
document to be used.. When changing a pattern colour, a new
swatch has to be
created, which is more time consuming than changing the tiff
colour in FHMX.
5 seconds vs. 5 minutes
• The arrow+ tool in Ill selects in increments of one
group at a time. FHMX
selects in increments of one element at a time, giving the
user greater
control over elements within groups.
• In Ill before using Pathfinder/Unite, you should
save, because pathfinder
tool often crashes the program. Since large documents take
time to save,
waiting time in Ill multiplies. FHMX doesn't crash when using
the pathfinder
tool so much time and frustration is saved.
Sometimes Pathfinder in Ill just won't work the way it's
expected to. I wind
up importing the art into FHMX where it works fine and
instantly.

I think what Morty said needs to be reminded here:
quote:
quote:
Should we read anything into Adobe putting out the Freehand
to
Illustrator migration guide you posted about?
No, that's something that Adobe has planned for quite some
time. I hinted to its release several months back when we were all
discussing how Adobe should produce such a document. This "rumor"
that I refer to is something that surprised me as well. I have yet
to confirm it though...
Mordy
Since Adobe was planning this for some time, let's not jump
to conclusions. Mordy did confirm to us that there is indeed a
Product Manager for FreeHand. Also, it's interesting to note that
Adobe has a different situation on their hands than they did with
Pagemaker. What we have is two competing (?) programs, FH and Illy,
they are both truly loved by their devoted users. Adobe probably
realizes that they gave to keep both because the users of either
program have been devoted for years. Neither Illy or FH users would
be happy about migrating. Adobe I'm sure will keep both programs
(at least I'm hoping they are smart enough to). When Adobe migrated
Pagemaker users to InDesign, InDesign was a new tool. Illy is old
like FH...you ca't force a migration to a tool that is just as old
as the one your migrating from.

How Adobe should monetize the AIR SDK and keep supporting game devs

As per the message title, someone at Adobe should take a look at this thread on the Starling Forum:
http://forum.starling-framework.org/topic/whats-new-in-adobe-air/page/5#post-26940
Best Regards,

You typically use the Adobe AIR Update for Flash CS3
Professional (
http://www.adobe.com/support/flash/downloads.html)
with Flash CS. I don't know if it is possible to update the
libraries referenced by the authoring tool manually.
The AIR SDK is useful if you are developing AIR apps with
HTML and JavaScript.

I have taken a 12 month membership for cc and photoshop. I now see that adobe are offering the same product for only $9.99 per month including lightroom, whereas I am paying $19.99 a month. Is it possible to change plans without any penility payments.

I have a monthly membership to Photoshop CS6 costing $19.99 per month on a 12 month membership. I now see that Adobe are offering the same product for only $9.99 per month. Is it possible to change plans with any extra costs to me. Thankyou

Hi rjmo
Yes, you can switch to the Creative Cloud Photography Plan without penalty.
Please check this doc for the differences between this plan and the Photoshop single app plan you have currently: Photoshop Help | Differences between Photoshop and Creative Cloud Photography Programs
Let me know if you wish to proceed with the switch and I can arrange it.
Thanks
Bev

Is Domain Registration Necessary?

I'm trying to set up a server for a medical lab, which would have three clients. They simply want the server to function as a file server, and to help manage their backup needs. They also want to access the server outside their local network.
I'm thinking that the best way to go would be to set up the server as an Open Directory Master. Since it simplifies DNS, and everything else associated with DNS (right?).
So my question has to do with the need to register a domain for this server. Is it necessary?

Excellent, David. Thank you for your cogent
response.
I have a couple of follow-up questions.
Does Domain Registration bring with it certain
advantages? I suppose it does, if the server will
host web pages for the little group.
If you have any services which you want to make available to the 'public' then it can be beneficial to have your external public DNS to be the same domain as the internal one - but not absolutely necessary.
Mail services - yes. Not only because you want your server hostname to be part of your public domain (but mail services can still run fine without this) but you can then have portable clients get the one mail hostname in their settings: when the laptop is outside the LAN, the hostname resolves to the public WAN IP; when inside LAN, it resolves to the LAN IP.
Web: not necessary. You could have the public DNS pointing to your WAN IP and then just have the website host address in the web-services pane.
The other thing I wonder, if I've been using
testserver.test.com, can I easily change the server's
name, if I want to re-do the server with something
other than a practice name? So far I've set up 1)
DNS, 2) Open Directory, and 3) AFP. In re-doing it,
I guess I would turn off the services for AFP and
Open Directory, and then change the DNS. Then I
would go back through and alter AFP and Open
Directory. Would that be correct?
You can demote from ldap master to standalone (deletes all users in ldap directory), change DNS and IP/hostname using terminal command "changeip", and then promote back to master. Search for 'changeip' both here and in Open Directory forum. HOWEVER, if it is currently just a test installation I would strongly suggest just reinstalling everything and starting again - as well as ensuring everything is 'clean', the repeat of the install will be educational
-david
Server 10.4.8

Sony should offer "Recycling program" for Xperia 2011 users

With the last news, there is no hope to use a stable OS for Xperia 2011 users.
If we don't get JellyBean, There is no meaning to use this buggy laggy ICS.
So Sony should offer "Recycling program" for Xperia 2011 users just like Apple.
Sony should think customers.
We don't deserve to be ignored.

Sign this petition if you want to try to reason with Sony, about upgrading all xperia 2011 to 4.1.1.
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/sony-update-xperia-2011-range-to-jelly-bean-4-1-1/signature-map....

Domain Registration Good Rates and Local Hosting??

I need to buy a domain name, but don't want to put more money into it than I need to. I'm going to host locally, so I will need a site that will allow me to sign up and host locally. Any good domain registration sites that fit this criteria?
ReptileKing234
A voice of reason in a world gone mad

www.ineedtochangemysocks.com doesn't exist... interesting joke, but would have been better if it was an actual site with socks on it.
ReptileKing234
A voice of reason in a world gone mad

Domain Registration on Safari

I am trying to complete a domain registration with safari on http://www.onlydomains.com but keep getting errors, I have tried using firefox & works fine, Has anyone else had the same problem?

Domain Registration

Firefox 34 unstable. Plugins blocked, Flash not working, cannot update Flash. Cannot update FLASH, as Adobe not offering update.

Repeated crashes with latest Firefox Version 34, running on Win XP SP3. Older Firefox version worked flawlessly. Update was a bad idea, as "security" fixes now block Flash from working. Attempt to update via Adobe cause further problems. Repeated crashes of internal program "plugin-container.exe". Poor product now, fails to provide the basic functionality - ie. viewing Flash video - that most web-brower users require. This solution was "solved" and worked fine, but stupid decisions appear to have been taken to block Flash, rather than fix the security vulnerabilites. Can't the leaky Adobe code just be "sandboxed" so code execution outside of a defined memory area is made impossible? About 1 billion global users rely on Flash, as most
video delivery websites use it. Just "blocking" the plugin is an arrogant goof's solution to the security problem.
But Adobe seems to have become obnoxious about not allowing or offering upgrades or fixes of Flash.
Recommended solution seems to be to download and install Dolphin browser, which is built to at least include Flash support internally.
Question: <nowiki>**********</nowiki>
Is there a recommended way to get the Flash plugin installed and working correctly in a recent version of Firefox???
Step by step instructions should be provided.
<nowiki>********************</nowiki>
It is almost 2015, and software development seems to be going retrograde, with "enhancements" simply crashing existing systems, and causing more problems than are solved. No wonder everyone is just disabling upgrades once they get a working
system. I deeply regret upgrading to Firefox Ver. 34, as it does not run Flash video correctly now.

*** SOLVED *** !!!
I was having strange problems re. Youtube+Flash website.
Turned out to be some hard-coded ip-redirection in my "hosts" file.
I found it by searching and reading all the "youtube" related Mozilla FIrefox support forums. Thanx for this forum, guys. It is a good resource. And I apologize for my cranky, petulant initial comment. It was inappropriate. The error was mine completely.
Problem was an old hard-coded fix that I put into my HOSTS file, on my Windows XP, SP3 machine. Specifically, I had experienced hang issues with a site called "i.ytimg.com", which I believe is the static cache for Google/Youtube stuff. I tracked this error down to failures of security certificates, but confirmed my security cert store was isometric between my machine cluster (they were all the damn same!)
So, I had put two lines in the HOSTS file, to hard-code an IP address so that Google-youtube pages would not hang up waiting for "i.ytimg.com"
Well, of course, Google/Youtube is now using different locations, or akami servers or some damn thing...
The fix just involved removing these two hard-coded lines from my HOSTS file. I just commented the old fix out, and now everything works.
<pre>
# --- two lines added to fix i.ytimg.com hang problem
# 74.125.162.39 static.cache.l.google.com s.ytimg.com
# 74.125.162.39 static.cache.l.google.com i.ytimg.com
</pre>
(The # symbol is used to make a comment in hosts file... )
On Windows XP, XP3, the "hosts" file is typically located in:
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
If you are having goofy problems with some youtube/google webpages
not rendering, or generating SSL (bad_certificate) errors, check your
"hosts" file, and ensure no ip redirection has been slotted in there
from a while back.
Hope this helps others...
- Mark Langdon, GEMESYS Ltd.

Need help with Domain Registration and Hosting

Hi Folks,
I have a few questions which I hope some of you may be able to help me with.
1) I would like to register a domain name, which registrars might some of you suggest, as a mac user? Nice interface, easy to use, not pushy sign up process, etc.
2) I would also like to sign up for hosting with my new domain name, so that I can have an FTP site, CalDav support, IMAP e-mail with my domain name, and a very nice webmail app. I have been looking around and found a lot, but none that are nice to use, they all look like windows 95ish, etc.
I will be hosting the actual website on my .mac space, but running the FTP through the hosting site, and would like to run the IMAP e-mail via the host as well. That's about it, I'm sure some more questions will follow soon, but I do want to register my domain ASAP, but at the same time find a host, because I know sometimes the registration is free when you sign up with a host, so would prefer not to spend double for something, sort of.
Thanks for all you help!

Check out GoDaddy. There cheap and offer the services you want. http://GoDaddy.com there website probably isn't the easiest to use, but their prices sorta compromise for it. If your looking for a more upscale provider then check out http://www.machost.com/ and http://macosxhosting.com/

Please help - Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional Registration Prompt

I have deployed Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional to a few workstations using the Custom Installation Wizard and I randomly get prompted to complete the Registration. I have added the following to my installation but continue to get prompted randomly:
1. Disabled Registration in the Custom Installation Wizard.
2. Placed the registration file in c:\documents and settings\username\app data\adobe\
3. Ran these two reg keys.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Adobe\Adobe Acrobat\9.0\AdobeViewer]
"Registered"=dword:00000002
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Adobe\Adobe Acrobat\9.0\FeatureLockDown]
"bRegisterProduct"=dword:00000000
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Veronica

This is the Reader forum; the Acrobat one is here:
http://forums.adobe.com/community/acrobat
In any case, any major edition in a PDF file is best done in the original file (the one from which the PDF was produced), creating a new PDF when finished.

Domain Registration

I've got a client who has registered his domain name with a domain name registering company.
I've bought some web space to house the website....do I have to contact the domain name registration company and provide them with the server details of where they need to point the domain name or is this something that can be done without their involvement?
Usually I start from fresh, get the webspace and domain name from the same source.
Os

Murray *ACP* wrote:
It's not that a process is running that takes that long, it's that different farms update their nameservers on a differing schedule. It may be that they only update once every 24 hours, and your changes occurred just after they updated. Clients usually understand that kind of reason....
They may say they understand and accept it but are totally oblivious to anything to do with the internet in my experience.....mention a 'farm' and that will just confuse them even further.
I know what youre saying but I like to keep my customers updated at all times and try to give them precise information rather than 'it could be this' or 'it could be' that type of attitude. I really hate that so I try and treat people I do business with how I want to be treated myself.

Citrix XenApp 6.5 PVS - Adobe Acrobat Pro XI Registration PopUp

Dear Community,
wondering how to get rid of that registration popup when starting Adobe Acrobat Pro XI (11.0.5) on Citrix XenApp 6.5 privisioned Windwos 2008 R2 server?
Anyone who can help with this? Thanks in advance.
Andrew

Dear brogers_1,
thanks for your answer. Can you please be a little mor specific. Is it enough to customize the installer (.msi) generally or do we have to set a special settings, so every user will not get the popup "registration" (see screenshot attached) anymore when starting the application?
Thanks in advance for a reply.
Andrew

Uninstall and Reinstall Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro registration failed

I have uninstalled and reinstall Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro on my new machine. My new machine runs Mac OS X 10.9.5. Every time I try to click on Help > Registration it returns an error message 'Registration Unsuccessful" "A problem was encountered while trying to send information over the Internet". I have no issue with Internet connection. Just wondering why this is happening and is there any way we can register this application.

Hi Ksb2009,
This version of Acrobat was never tested on this version of Mac and is unsupported.
I would suggest you may upgrade to latest version of Acrobat and that will work fine. It has loads of new and enhanced features than Acrobat 8.
Regards,
Ajlan Huda.

Adobe Should Offer Domain Registration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for