Advanced search GUI problem
Hi I am working with jdev10g (120x19dbg)
I have created one query region.this shows simple as well as advanced search.
in advanced search i have 15 criteria, i have mapped them properly and search is also happening.
My problem is related to UI part. In advanced search all 15 criterai comes in one column (which takes away full page from top to botyom) and also prompts are wrapped.
At the same time simple search GUI works perfectly.
I don't why this is happening...
pls help
Naveen
Are you getting alignment issue with 4 columns also? Did you try to resize the window and test? Also test with 2-3 different browsers.
--Shiv
Similar Messages
-
LOV in Advanced Search Mode Problem
Hi all,
I have a strange problem with LOV!.
In advanced search of our pages, sometimes we used LOV.
As a normal way, we used two entities for the whole page, one as updatable
one, and another which is referenced in LOV and I defined that as reference.
After choosing a value from LOV, I want to assign its return values (from
selected row) to other fields. The returned values from LOV that are comming
from updatable entity is available and I could access them, but I can not see
the returned values from the reference entity.
At the end, I repeat that our LOV is working now for create mode and our problem with that is only in Advanced Search mode.
Thanks for ur helps:)Hi Nasser2,
You could try to make the attribute in the reference entity that you want to put a new value in, updateable.
I guess you don't see the return value in that attribute in advanced search, because the VO-attr is readonly (which makes sense, because it is a reference-attribute!).
Regards
Evert-Jan
JHeadstart Team -
Maverick XI 11.0.06, quit unexpectedly when try to fill form. Installed patch and use advanced search same problem
You may want to install the 11.0.07 Update to see if there is an improvement in the behavior.
Adobe - Acrobat : For Macintosh : Adobe Acrobat 11.0.07 Pro update - All languages -
I have been using Firefox and Ebay for at least 12 years with no problems whatsoever. But in the last 10 days I have been having trouble with the Advanced Search link disappearing from the page on Ebay. If I do a search from the Ebay home page it will show the results, but the Advanced Search link (in blue letters) which always used to appear to the right of the Search button is gone. If I click Search again at this point I can see the Advanced Search link appear for a millisecond, but then disappear just as quickly. Also, if I refresh the page the same thing happens. I tried to duplicate this problem with Internment Explorer and it didn't occur, so it appears to be Firefox that is causing this issue. Of course when I contacted Ebay they told me my problem was that I wasn't using Internment Explorer! I love Firefox and do not want to switch!
You can try to clear the cache and cookies to see if that makes a difference:
<h3>Clearing Cache</h3>
#Go to Firefox > History > Clear recent history or (if no Firefox button is shown) go to Tools > Clear recent history.
#Under "Time range to clear", select "Everything".
#Now, click the arrow next to Details to toggle the Details list active.
#From the details list, check ''Cache'' and uncheck everything else.
#Now click the ''Clear now'' button.
<h3>Clearing Cookies</h3>
#Go to Firefox > Tools > Privacy > Remove Individual Cookies
#Find the site (ebay.com) that's having problems and clear all cookies.
#Restart Firefox
Further information can be found in the [[Clear your cache, history and other personal information in Firefox]] article. -
Problem with removing Search and Advanced Search functionalities in Portal
Hi,
As per our client requirement, we have removed search and advanced search functionalities in Masthead and those are working fine. But when ever we restarted the portal server, these search options are reappearing in portal.
I am not getting why it is happening and every time we restarted the server, we are removing these search functionalities from masthead.
If anyone knows why it is happening, kindly share with us
Thanks & Regards
PavanHi Santosh,
Problem is not solved. Where can i find the Standard tool area iview used in Default frame work page ?
At present, we disabeled the search and it's working fine. But when we restart the portal, search is again reappearing and we need to disable that once again.
Is there any sollution for this problem?? Kindly let me know..
Thanks & Regards
Pavan
Edited by: pavanakrishna reddy on Mar 24, 2010 9:44 AM -
Advanced searching problem coming up?
i am working on the website which makes a advances search but
due to some cause it is not working, it is by default shows all
results no matter if i filter the results by any means..
my query is below:
<cfquery datasource="#request.dsn#" name="Recordset1">
SELECT properties_details.*, suburbname,suburbs.suburb_id,
tenants.tenantID, profession
FROM
properties_details
JOIN suburbs ON suburbs.suburb_id =
properties_details.suburb_id
JOIN tenants ON tenants.tenantID =
properties_details.tenant_id
WHERE 0=0
<CFLOOP INDEX="word" LIST="#Url.keywords#" DELIMITERS="
">
<cfif Url.keywords IS NOT "">
AND property_unique_name like '%#word#%'
</cfif>
<cfif Url.type IS NOT "">
AND mode like '%#word#%'
</cfif>
<cfif Url.suburb IS NOT "">
AND suburb_id like '%#word#%'
</cfif>
<cfif Url.category IS NOT "">
AND tenant_id like '%#word#%'
</cfif>
<cfif Url.totalbedrooms IS NOT "">
AND total_bedrooms like '%#word#%'
</cfif>
</CFLOOP>
order by property_dateadded DESC
</cfquery>
</cfif>
if i specify something in the KEYWORDS field, then it just
make a search for that keyword only and ignore all other options..
is something wrong above
can u guide to correct suggestition..
thanksmharraz378 wrote:
I have also changed to it RGB instead of CMYK could that be the problem??/
Maybe, but I often see this warning even in CMYK. It's not a fatal error and nothing to worry about. You actually want to be using the profiles you specified, so it's a good thing. -
Problem in using quick and advanced search based on transient items
Hi everybody
I want to have an unbound string item in my form and allow users to use advanced search and quick search on that item.
I read the following post About advanced search and added a transient
item on view object and overrode the advance search method in application module and realized that the value of that string was
added to arguments.
Then I decided to add this transient item on entity object instead of view object so that we were able to add the item in one place and
use it in several view objects. I added an item in the entity and unchecked the persistent flag but I can't set queryable flag since it was disable.
I added the item in the view object and by use of application definition I forced the item to be shown in the advance search.
I generate the application and the item was shown correctly in the advanced search but when I set the item in advanced search its value
was not sent to advance search method.
Is it a bug ? (value of the field in the advanced search section was not sent to advanced search method )
Is it a way to add a queryable transient item in the entity object and still benefit from overriding advanced search method ?
I am using Jdeveloper 10.1.3 and Jheadstart 10.1.3.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best Regards
NavidNavid,
JHeadstart checks whether the attribute definition is queryable before adding it to the list of advanced search attributes. A transient VO attribute can still be set to queryable, for a transient EO attribute this is not possible. We will remove this check on queryability in the upcoming patch release, since you have a valid use case. For now, you can subclass JhsSearchBean and override method createArgumentListForAdvancedSearch and comment out the check for "def.isQueryable()".
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team. -
In advanced search inputtext turkish character problem
Hi friends,
In my project when page is shown first Turkish characters in input text looks fine.But when I press advanced search button only input texts values changed and turkısh characters not show.For example İ return Ý.
I use jdeveloper 10.1.3.1 with jheadstart 10.1.3.1 license version. Project is published with oracle application server soa suite 10.1.3.What am I do for solved it???Thanks for all....Can you provide step-by-step instructions to reproduce this behavior based on the HR demo, that can be downloaded from
http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/tips/muench/jhstutorial/MyDemo.zip
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team. -
How can i manual create a "advance search"?
There is a poplist in the page, and a named "Add" submitButton beside it.
When I click the "Add" button.
I need to create a Bean which is named from the text which is selected in the poplist.
Now, I have two problems:
1.I select a text from poplist, then click the "Add" button. At the first time, I use to setForwardURLToCurrentPage() to create a new Bean. But at the next time, no matter which I select any text from poplist, I only get the text which is selected at the first time. The poplist and "Add" button in one MessageCompontentLayout, and the other compontents (consist of creating new Bean) in the other MessageCompontentLayout.
2.when I create a new Bean, how can I save the Bean which I have created it at previous time.
This function just likes "Advance Search".
waiting for your help. thank you in advance.Hello, 1st publish it to your Drive...
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/iWeb-Tips.html
Other hints/workarounds...
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/mountain-lion.html -
How can I get a LOV to work in the advanced search area
I am using JHeadstart 10.1.3.3.
We are doing a LOV lookup on User-id. When the user selects a user-id or just starts keying in a user-id I have my Jheadstart code to pull in the full-name whenever the client selects a new user-id or starts keying a userid.
Under UserId we have the following definition
PersonIdentitiesLOV
UserId <= UserId
FullName <= CombinedName
We set up PersonIdentitiesLOV so that "Use LOV for validation" is set to true.
When I tested my code, in the advanced search this is what happened:
1) When the client selects a user-id the FullName field gets populated
2) When the client just keys in the user-id then the FullName DOES NOT get populated.
Someone told me that there is a bug in JHeadstart in 10.1.3.3 where if you turn on the "Use LOV for validation" then it does not get executed in the Advanced Search.
How do I get around this problem.
If this does not work then how would it be best to display the full name whenever someone keys in a user-id. We are using this full name display for auditing purposes at the cashiers wicket whenever someone keys in a userid and does not recognize the person. We want the full name displayed along with userid for verification purposes.
Any idea on how to get this working?This is not a bug, it is intended behavior.
In search fields you might want to search for parts of the name, using a wildcard, that's why the auto-complete is not working there.
If an end user wants to search the complete name, he can use the LOV to pick a value.
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team. -
Search Item drop-down does not show any data for Advanced Search.
Hi,
I have a requirement to add a new criteria to the existing Advanced Search region of 'My Employee Information' in Manager Self Service responsibility. I substituted the AdvancedSearchVO to include the new column. Using personalization i did the below steps to show the new column in the page,
1) Created a 'Message Styled Text' item under Table Layout region to display the result. I associated the View Instance (AdvancedSearchVO1) and View Attribute (AttrColumn).
2) In Advanced Search Panel created a new CriteriaRow and set the 'Search Allowed' property to True.
3) In Advanced Search Mappings i tried to create the new mapping but the Search Item drop-down does not show any of the CriteriaRow item. But Results Item shows the 'Message Styled Text' item created in step 1 above.
Any idea what i would be missing becasue of which 'Search Item' property does not show any data?
I am using OAF version 12.1.1.
Thanks, SureshHi,
I faced the same situation but i still waiting for the solution.. this is my problem's thread..
Addition of LOV Search Filter using Personalization
But when i tried to create a new custom page with advanced table and created a new LOV column via personalization. i was able to create new search mapping.. but this is not happening in the seeded page case :(.
I m also looking for solution...if any one can provide some inputs on it , will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Renu -
What can I try if the store's Advanced Search strikes out trying to find the song I want?
Perhaps the song is not available in MP3 format, or isn't available in the iTunes Store, or simply not available in your country. (A Norwegian band's first album from the 1980s became available in MP3 format only in April 2012; an example that not everything is automatically is available in MP3 as soon as possible.)
... and before any wag says, or even thinks "it", yes - the Norwegian band's album is very good! (Still waiting for their second album, from 1982, though!)
You may be surprised at how often a song or album is not available because of "contractual problems" - in other words, someone's being greedy, difficult, or both. (Another album I like, from a UK band of the 70's, was unavailable for a long time because - and I'm quoting the band's leader - "the copyright owner wanted too much money for the album to be on CD.")
You could try looking for the song in other stores. If it's not yet available anyhwere, you'll just have to be patient. You could try contacting the band via any websites they have, and asking them about it's availability. What's the song? Perhaps I (or soemoen else) might be able to confirm it's availability on MP3 from another source. -
Getting an error in advanced search
Hi
I am getting this error when I click following options
- Add document folder
- Add Administartor folder
in advanced search.
Error -
The server has experienced an error. Try again, or contact your Portal administrator if you continue experiencing problems.
ThanksDear INDshree, check this link upgrade EHP4 error REPACHK phase
let us know the out come.
Regards, Amber S | ITL -
Advanced Search in Reader 9 for packages w/ embedded indexes created in Acrobat 8.1
I am having a terrible day. I've just finished combining thousands of documents into 6 packages w/ embedded indexes using Acrobat 8.1. The advanced search feature allowed me to enter several peoples names "Wilkes Terry White Smith Johnson, and I could select to "Match any of the terms" and I'd be able to see any documents that mentioned any of those names. The problem is that my boss only has Reader 9 installed and his advanced search screen looks entirely different for the nice advanced search screen I can see. I can't figure out how to get all the advanced search features for him to use. If he enters several names "Wilkes Terry White Smith", he gets no hits because the system is assuming I'm just looking for someone named "Wilkes Terry White Smith." Is there any way to have the search look for "Match any of the terms" as opposed to "Match the exact phrase" using Reader 9. I'm in deep trouble tomorrow.
Is there any way to have the search look for "Match any of the terms" as opposed to "Match the exact phrase" using Reader 9.
Yes; if the embedded index is still present and "Search" rather than "Find" is used.
Edit > Search rather than Edit > Find.
Search requires the embedded index or a Catalog index.
If a PDF having an embedded index undergoes a "Save As" the embedded index is removed and the PDF saved to support Fast Web View.
Be well... -
Google Advanced Search only displays 10 Results per page in Firefox 3.6.10
In Google Advanced Search, choose any value for Results per page greater than 10 and do a search. When using Firefox 3.6.10, only 10 results are displayed on each page of results. 10 results per page is the Google default, and the Results per page selection apparently has no effect.
This problem also happens in Google Chrome 6.0.472.63.
The Results per page feature of Google Advanced Search is working properly in other browsers, such as Safari 4.1.2 on a PowerPC Mac and IE 7.0.5730.13 and IE 6.0.2900.5512.xpsp3_gdr.100427-1636 on a PC running Windows XPGoogle recently made some changes to the Google search site with the addition of Instant search and that made the setting of the number of results in the Google settings to stop working.<br />
<br />
If Instant search is enabled on the [http://www.google.com/preferences?hl=en Google Search settings] page (link at the top right) then you only get 10 results.<br />
You have to disable instant search and reload the result page and then set the number of results to your preferred choice.<br />
It may not work if you make both changes at the same time.<br />
<br />
There is a link directly to the right of the Google search field on the Google results page.<br />
That is a button with a drop down list: Instant is On/Off.<br />
Maybe you are looking for
-
Software Updates Missing and File Not opening in Final Cut Pro
Hi Experts, I am having trouble with Final Cut Pro. Here goes:- I tried to load up a FCP file called "Overview" in Lesson One of the Apple Pro Training Series book called "Color". The file would not open and I got the following message alert in FCP:
-
How many levels of hierarchy is supported in AII?
hi, i heard that the mobile UI supports only two levels of hierarchy... otherwise is it possible to have Container-Pallet-Case-Item such hierarchy? thanks, vinoth
-
I understand that the new iOS is only 1.1GB, but I don't understand why I need at least 3.8GB of free space on my iPhone to download the new software. I also don't want to lose space on my iPhone from downloading the new software, because 3.8GB is a
-
Can I call MS Excel Function in Oracle
Hi everyone, I prototyped my application in Microsoft Excel. In this prototype, I'm using the BETADIST() function, which returns the cumulative beta probability density function. And, yes, if you're like me, and not a statistician, it's pretty crazy.
-
Restricting no of positions in org unit : SAP OM
Hi, 1) My Client wants the no of positions to be restricted at a specific Org unit level in Tree Hierarachy. 2) Also that no of positions describing a job should not be greater than a specific number. Request you to guide me how to achieve this in OM