Advantages/Disadvantages to publishing to folder

I recently received very good advice here regarding publishing & having my iWeb site HOSTED by godaddy.com. I cleaned up my website (I think) by publishing to a folder and using Web Site Maestro. I also got Cyberduck and now my next question is this:
*If I publish to a folder and then upload to godaddy.com to continue HOSTING, will I be able to use the "Add A Comment" on my Blog, and also use the "Counter Box"?*
I understand about "Forwarding & Masking" to MobileMe as I already have godaddy.com doing this on another website of mine. The reason I wanted godaddy.com to HOST my new website is that I now have four websites on my iWeb 09. 1st one (for family) is published to MobileMe, the 2nd one (for old college friends) is also on MobileMe, AND I use godaddy.com for FORWARDING & MASKING because this site is more public. The 3rd ( for a soccer team) also has FORWARDING & MASKING for the same reason.
My 4th & newest web site is really public, and that is the prime reason I wanted HOSTING separate from MobileMe. Also because I ran into trouble trying to publish it with the multiple MobileMe sites, with stuff getting re-directed every which way.
*SO, my dilemma:*
It is of the _utmost importance_ to have the Blogging "Add A Comment" capability with my 4th web site. I searched Discussions and found some information about using "Word Press" and embedding on my Blog page per Mr. Old Toad. However, I really do not want to spend any more money, and I did not like any of the other possibilities when I Googled other options.
*The other part of this is that if I change the newest site to having godaddy.com do FORWARDING & MASKING to my MobileMe, will I run into the same problem with the three other sites already published?*
If the answer to my first question is OK to use Cyberduck to keep all my features, then I will go that route. If not, then I really need some good advice.
Thank you for your attention to this issue - I do not know what I would do without this forum.
Denver golden

When you publish your site to a folder you should be informed that you will loose MobileMe features such as blog comments and hit counter etc.
You can still host directly with GoDaddy, but what you can do instead is to create a blog with WordPress - this is completely free. You can either use WordPress.com (http://www.wordpress.com) where you choose a blog name and your blog is then published directly to WordPress. You can then create a link from your website to your WordPress blog - this is the option that I use for my own blog with WordPress.
If you are using GoDaddy to host, your other option is to use WordPress.org (http://www.wordpress.org). With GoDaddy, you have the ability to load WordPress on your server and then your blog will be http://www.domain.com/blog. You can create a link from your site again or embed it into your site. This again is free and will be included as part of your hosting package with GoDaddy.
As Old Toad has said, you can also use the JS.Kit commenting system, but to get this onto your site it does mean that you will have to publish your site to a folder and open it using an html editor such as TextWrangler to be able to enter the javascript code on the page where you want the comments to appear - would you be able to do this? If not, then it is probably not worth it.
If you publish to MobileMe and use GoDaddy for masking and forwarding it is not going to affect any of your other websites at all - when forwarding and masking all you do is forward the appropriate domain name to web.me.com/username/sitename, so as long as your site has a different site name and you make sure that you forward your domain name to the correct site name, then it won't affect anything else that you have.

Similar Messages

How to publish to an FTB server in iWeb 2 using the File ➙ Publish to Folder option??

I was just given the following advice regarding publishing to an FTP other than MobileMe.
Web 08 does not have that feature (drop down menu to publish from "site" icon). You will need to upgrade to iWeb 3 in iLife 11 in order to get that feature. You can get iLife 11 at the online Apple Store while supplies last since iWeb (and iDVD) have been discontinued by Apple
To pubish to an FTB server in iWeb 2 use the File ➙ Publish to Folder menu option and then use a 3rd party FTP client like Cyberduck to upload the site files.
Follon-on question, can anyone provide more details on how to do exactly what was suggested? I toyed with it and can only get it to publish to a folder on my desktop, but not to an external FTP. (I have already purchased a web-host package, just need to publish to it!)

Okay. When you publish your site from iWeb to a local folder what you will get is one site folder - this site folder will have the same name as you gave your site in iWeb and one separate index.html file.
Your site folder contains an index.html file as well as the separate index.html file. You NEED both.
What you need to do is firstly using Cyberduck or whatever, upload your site folder to your host into whatever folder you need to upload to on the server - could be 'public_html', 'htdocs' or whatever - this is your root folder.
You then need to upload your separate index.html file to your server too, but this index file needs to sit outside your site folder because it needs to point in towards the index.html file that is in your site folder - this is the first page of your site.
You don't delete or duplicate any index files - iWeb produces the two index files that you need when you publish to a local folder - one index file in the site folder itself and one separate index file that sits outside the site folder and points into the first page of your site.
Also, remember to call the first page of your site something like Home or Welcome, but DO NOT name it index.
By the looks of things here you have not uploaded your index files correctly.
What I would suggest that you do is start over - so open Cyberduck and connect to your server and go and delete your site folder and your other index file if it is still there.
Go back to iWeb and publish to a local folder again and notice that you have both your site folder and separate index.html file.
Now go and open Cyberduck again and connect to your server and note where you need to upload your files to.
Now go and upload your Site Folder to your server and once this has finished go back and upload your separate index.html file, but this needs to sit outside your site folder. If you do this, then your site should display okay - as long as your other index file is pointing into to the first page of your site it should display correctly.

Does my iDisk website folder have the same contents as the folder created with Publish to Folder?

Should I make a back up of the website folder on iDisk? Is this folder the same as the Domain.sites2 folder in the Library?
Is it the same as the folder that's created when I click Publish to Folder in iWeb? It's so confusing - from where should I save, copy, or backup
my website? Thanks for clearing this up.

The folder on iDisk is the published files - the Domain.sites2 has the unpublished data.
The published files on the iDisk aren't much use to you since you need to republish your site to a new server directly from iWeb or via a local folder and FTP.
Publishing....
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/Publish-Website.html
Hosting...
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/Website-Hosting.html

What are some of the advantages/disadvantage of using FC or FCoE with a storage array (EMC)? What is Cisco's recommendation and why?

What are some of the advantages/disadvantages of using FC or FCoE for a storage array? What does Cisco recommend?

This is what I'm considering:
Power:
1050W Seasonic 80PLUS Gold Power Supply
Motherboard:
ASUS, Rampage IV Extreme, 2011, SATA6, True Quad SLI/XFIRE, Extreme OC Capable
CPU:
Intel Core i7-4960X 3.60GHz, 2133MHz DDR3, 15MB Cache, Hex Core Processor
System Memory:
16GB (4 x 4GB) , PC3-19200, 2400MHz (G.Skill - x79)
Video Adapter 1:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780ti 3GB GDDR5
Video Adapter 2:
None
Optical 1
16X Blu-ray Burner - 16xBD-R, 2xBD-RW/16xDVD-R, 8xDVD-RW/48xCD-R, 24xCD-RW
Bay Accessories 1
NZXT Aperture M Multi-media Hub
RAID [Requires Identical Hard Drive Selections]
RAID 0 | 2 Disk Min. Striped set, improved performance, additional storage drive highly recommended
Hard Drive 1
Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
Hard Drive 2
Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
Hard Drive 3
Crucial M550 1TB 2.5" SATA III 6GB/sec Solid State Drive
Sound Card
Creative Labs Sound Blaster Z PCI Express

Differences & advantages/disadvantages using OCFS & OMF

Differences & advantages/disadvantages using “OCFS & OMF” against “ServiceGuard & Veritas CFS” in a RAC implementation

>
Differences & advantages/disadvantages using “OCFS & OMF” against “ServiceGuard & Veritas CFS” in a RAC implementationYou need to read a book on RAC for this kind of question - Julian Dyke would
be my recommendation.
Paul...
When asking database related questions, please give other posters
some clues, like OS (with version), version of Oracle being used and DDL.
Other trivia such as CPU, RAM + Disk configuration might also be useful.
The exact text and/or number of error messages is useful (!= "it didn't work!"). Thanks.
Furthermore, as a courtesy to those who spend time analysing and attempting to help,
please do not top post and do try to trim your replies!

Please let me know the advantage & disadvantage of Cell definition

Hi ALL,
can anyone let me know the advantage & disadvantage of Cell definition in bex query.
Please suggest on this.
Thanks & Regards
Sameer Khan

There are no advantages or disadvantages for cell definitions, it is just the requirement...

Advantages/disadvantages,Capabilities,Failures of Types of mapping

Dear all,
Can you kindly explain me the Advantages/disadvantages,Capabilities,Failures of Types of mapping.
what is the parser XSLT uses.
what is differnece between sax/dom parsers.
Thanks,
Srinivasa

Hi srinivas phani ,
The following websites give u good documentation on Mapping:
Excellent PDF Document on Mapping
http://help.sap.com/bp_bpmv130/Documentation/Operation/MappingXI30.pdf
Mapping Development with the ABAP Workbench
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/10/5abb2d9df242f6a62e22e027a6c382/content.htm
ABAP Mappings
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ba/e18b1a0fc14f1faf884ae50cece51b/content.htm
how to create a flat file out of an IDoc-XML by means of an ABAP mapping program and the J2EE File Adapter.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/46759682-0401-0010-1791-bd1972bc0b8a
How to Use ABAP Mapping in XI 3.0
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e3ead790-0201-0010-64bb-9e4d67a466b4
SAXParser
Both DOM and SAX approaches have advantages and disadvantages, and your choice of technique must depend on the type of data being parsed, the requirements of your application, and the constraints under which you are operating.
The SAX approach is linear: It processes XML structures as it finds them, generating events and leaving the event handlers to decide what to do with each structure. The advantage of this approach is that it is resource-friendly; because SAX does not build a tree representation of the document in memory, it can parse XML data in chunks, processing large amounts of data with very little impact on memory. This also translates into better performance; if your document structure is simple, and the event handlers don't have anything too complicated to do, SAX-based applications will generally offer a speed advantage over DOM-based ones.
The downside, though, is an inability to move around the document in a non- linear manner. SAX does not maintain any internal record of the relationships between the different nodes of an XML document (as the DOM does), making it difficult to create customized node collections or to traverse the document in a non-sequential manner. The only way around this with SAX is to create your own custom object model, and map the document elements into your own custom structuresa process that adds to complexity and can possibly degrade performance.
Where SAX flounders, though, the DOM shines. The DOM creates a tree representation of the document in memory, making it possible to easily travel from one node to another, or even access the same node repeatedly (again, not something you can do easily in SAX). This tree representation is based on a standard, easy-to-understand model, making it easier to write code to interact with it.
This flexibility does, however, come with an important caveat. Because the DOM builds a tree in memory, DOM processing cannot begin until the document has been fully parsed (SAX, on the other hand, can begin parsing a document even if it's not all available immediately). This reduces a developer's ability to "manage" the parsing process by feeding data to the parser in chunks, and also implies greater memory consumption and consequent performance degradation.
Consequently, the choice of technique depends significantly on the type of constraints the application will be performing under, and the type of processing it will be expected to carry out. For systems with limited memory, SAX is a far more efficient approach. On the other hand, complex data-processing requirements can benefit from the standard object model and API of the DOM.
After using DOM to parse XML documents for any length of time, you will probably begin to notice that performance tends to suffer when youre dealing with large documents. This problem is endemic to DOM's tree-based structure: larger trees demand more memory, and DOM must load an entire document into memory before it can allow you to parse it. For situations where performance is problematic with DOM, you have an alternative in the Simple API for XML (SAX). In this fifth installment in our Remedial XML series, I'll introduce you to the SAX API, and provide some links to SAX implementations in several different languages.
Further differences can be seen in the following websites
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-22-1044823.html
Parsing XML Efficiently : DOM Parsing ,SAX Parsing
http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/03-sep/o53devxml.html
SAX Example
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=26351&seqNum=6&rl=1
Event or DOM parsing?
http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/default.asp?design.4.156750.12
SAX samples
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/samples-sax.html
Set up a SAX parser
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipsaxp.html
Simple API for XML (SAX)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_API_for_XML
SAX Parser Benchmarks
http://piccolo.sourceforge.net/bench.html
XML Parsers: DOM and SAX Put to the Test
http://www.devx.com/xml/Article/16922/1954?pf=true
High-Performance XML Parsing With SAX
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/02/14/perlsax.html
Using the SAX Parser
http://www.javacommerce.com/displaypage.jsp?name=saxparser1.sql&id=18232
Class SAXParser
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/javax/xml/parsers/SAXParser.html
Class SAXParser
http://people.apache.org/~andyc/neko/doc/html/javadoc/org/cyberneko/html/parsers/SAXParser.html
SAX Parsers
http://webdesign.about.com/od/saxparsers/SAX_Parsers.htm
Interface SAXParser
http://excalibur.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/excalibur/xml/sax/SAXParser.html
Class SAXParser
http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/javadocs/xerces2/org/apache/xerces/parsers/SAXParser.html
DOM Parsing
Excellent website showing how 2 use Document Object Model (DOM)
http://www.w3.org/DOM/
Document Object Model (DOM) Parsing
http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1597
Overview of DOM, DOM Level 3 core,DOM Level 3 Load & Save
http://www.softwaresummit.com/2004/speakers/GrahamJAXP1.pdf
Sample java program using DOM
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cocoon-cvs/200305.mbox/%[email protected]%3Eorg/mod_mbox/cocoon-cvs/200305.mbox/%[email protected]%3E
Easy RFC lookup from XSLT mappings using a Java helper class
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/05a3d62e-0a01-0010-14bc-adc8efd4ee14
XML Transformation Using the TrAX APIs in JAXP
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/07/06/jaxp.html?page=last
cheers!
gyanaraj
****Pls reward points if u find this helpful

Advantage/disadvantage in OS and Oracle clustering

Dear DBAs
i need to know what are the advantages and disadvantages in using Oracle clustering instead of OS clustering.
I will be thankfull if you can provide a table (advantage/disadvantage) for each case.
The OS is windows 2003 and the database is 10g
Thx in advance
Regards

One advantage could be you don't need to buy OS clusterware as it comes bundled with Oracle 10g.
So Cost benifit is One of the advantage.

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

From a practical perspective, besides the 64 bit version being a bit faster at just about everything, limitations on document size are lifted in the 64 bit version. Essentially, how much can do is limited only by how much RAM you have installed in your system. You can do things like have larger documents, deeper history, etc. and have it all work quickly.
On the other hand, many 3rd party plug-ins, especially older ones, only provide 32 bit versions, which will only run in 32 bit Photoshop.
Both 32 and 64 bit versions are installed by default. It's important to note that most of the preferences are separate between the two, so you can have two slightly different setups that might help with specialty operations you might need. This gets pretty subtle, but for example I keep the 32 bit version configured with only 1 cache level, so all previews of high bit depth images are always composited in high bit depth. This aids me with some aspects of astroimage processing. It's slower, but more accurate. By contrast I have more cache levels configured for my 64 bit version, so that's faster for general photography work.
-Noel

Level Based vs. Value Based hier: advantages, disadvantages and limitations

Could someone give an overview about the advantages, disadvantages and limitations when comparing OLAP Level to Value based hierarchies?
Thanks,
Marcio

OLAP can handle both types of hierarchies. No performance advantage using one over the other (while loading cube or querying).
If you are "pushing" dimensional-security inside OLAP, in that case also it does not matter.
Cube-based MVs (with query-rewrite) can only be created if the hierarchies are level-based. Are you going to need that?
Generally there are other "non-olap" factors:
(#1). Which reporting tool will be used. Does it provide better reporting capabilities if the source is parent-child or level-based?
(#2). Are there any reporting requirements that will need "level" information when selecting data.
(#3). Are there are any security requirements that will be handled in "reporting-layer" which will need level-based information.
Although in case of (#1) and (#2), you can "expose" an olap's parent-child hierarchy as "level-based" hierarchy to the reporting tool using internal GID (grouping-id) information.
OBIEE 11.1.1.5 (and future versions) works well with OLAP metadata, and with any type of hierarchy in olap.
For other reporting tools, you have to see what features are available.
In short, its the source system, the reporting tool and the reporting requirements that will dictate what type of hierarchy should be stored in OLAP.

What are the Advantages & Disadvantages in Material Ledger?

Hi Experts,
What are the Advantages & Disadvantages in Material Ledger?
Is it there any problem if you run CKMLCP next period 10th day?
What is the criticality in ML as well as why all are very fearful to implement it?
Thanks
Bhagirath

Hi,
One cannot speak of 'disadvantage' in this case... If you activate material ledger, you acieve different valuation logic of the prices in the procurement process. Please, consult composite note 532932 for further info. The intimidation of activation is a result of numerous 'bugs' in previous SAP releases regarding the material ledger documents. Most of these 'bugs' are fixed, but the fear remains
Regards,
Eli

Advantages/Disadvantages of installing Oracle RAC on Windows 2003 VS Linux

Hello Guys,
I am not very good with linux, have to create a Oracle RAC environment using dataabse 10g.
I just need to know the advantages/disadvantages of configuring RAC on windows and on linux operating system.
Please help me with this. Please also specify what is the best available windows and linux version to configure RAC.
Regards,
Imran

Go with th eOS you have the skills in, if you have onsite expertise in windows then it makes no sense to use Linux because some guy on the internet says its better. Windows can be a highly available server OS when is managed by professional well quallified adminstrators.
Personally I would use linux because I am more familiar with the OS than windows. I also find oracle makes more sense on a *NIX type platform but there are shops that run oracle on windows with the required high availability.

Order of Files inside Publish to Folder doesn't match website

The file sequence created with the Publish to Folder
option in iWeb'08 is diffferent from the website page sequence.
Why is that? I thought the folder files would follow
the same order as the website pages. Thanks for filling me in.

The published files are in alphabetical/numerical order.

Benefits/disadvantages of publishing a PDF from FM over RH?

Hi everyone...
Quick question. Is anyone aware of any benefits and/or disadvantages to publishing a PDF file out of FM over RH? We are creating both PDF and online help, and screen shots in PNG format (not resized) in FM published to PDF don't look nice... PNG screen shots (not resized) in FM, imported into RH and then generated as both PDF and/or webhelp look great in both formats.
I'm wondering what I am missing if I generate my PDF from RH as opposed to FM...
TIA,
Adriana

Hi there
As I understand it, the primary intent of Frame is to produce printed output. RoboHelp's primary intent is to produce on-line content. So if you have stuff in Frame, it makes sense to import to RoboHelp to then produce on-line. I mean CHM, WebHelp or FlashHelp here.
As Frame is capable (I think) of going directly to PDF, I'd say to use it to directly produce the PDF. If you ship to RoboHelp, you are converting three times. Once to create HTML topics, once to create the Word document and a third time to create the PDF from the Word document. Consider each conversion a potential issue point.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

XI & Biztalk - advantage & disadvantage

What are the advantage & disadvantage of XI & Biztalk ?
Which one is best solution as a middleware ?
Please provide in relavance to adapters IDOC etc..

Sap XI
       XI is well suited for connecting SAP systems with each other and with non-SAP. SAP XI provides an integrated workflow engine that allows defining adapters to non-XML protocols and mappings to convert data content from source to target format.
XI comes handy particularly incase of SAP - Non SAP interfaces where you can import standard integration content. Also XI has got sophisticated open standard adapter framework which is very easy to implement and custom logic can be implemented using Adapter module programming.
Advantages
Monitoring is better than any other middleware product. It offers exhaustive monitoring features like message, performance, component monitoring etc, all of which can be used to track and rectify the errors. It follows a hub and spoke model.
When you need to integrate with an SAP system XI has an advantage in supporting various SAP components and so on.
Process functionalities inside XI to modify content in the communication channel on own defined rules for business purposes.
Mappings and adapters are good as comparable with any other middleware product.
Synchronous & Asynchronous communication is possible.
Dis-Advantages
Web methods are particularly good if u have B2B kind of communication with their Trading Partners product.
XI is lacking full-fledged Message Queue compared to other established Middleware products.
It lacks in ability to process huge messages but SAP is working on that.
It does not have a messaging layer exposed by APIs like IBM MQ-Series.
It is not comparable to Tibco in terms of speed.
SAP relies on other vendors except for a few adapters.
3. BizTalk
            BizTalk is a business process management (BPM) server that enables companies to automate and optimize business processes. This includes powerful, familiar tools to design, develop, deploy, and manage those processes.
            While planning for the integration scenario BizTalk takes care about tasks like Gathering information, Defining naming conventions, planning team development, setting up and working with source control.
Advantages
BizTalk 2004 is completely built on .Net.
Recoverable Interchange. In BizTalk, an Interchange can contain two or more messages, such as a batch. With the introduction of Recoverable Interchange in BizTalk Server 2006, only messages that fail validation are suspended, and the messages can be resumed after the error is corrected.
Failed message routing. New functionality is available to allow orchestration and send ports to subscribe to failed messages. When used appropriately, failed message routing can be used for notifying users of failed messages or building rich error handling and message repair capabilities.
Lowest total cost of ownership (TCO). BizTalk Server reduces the cost and complexity of automating and managing business processes with a single, unified solution for Enterprise Application Integration (EAI), Business-to-Business integration (B2Bi), and Business Process Management (BPM).
Enhanced productivity through integrated management and development tools.
Supports Computer Telephony Interface (CTI) through TAPI.
Dis-Advantages
Recovery is manual.
Backups are not automated.
Fault Tolerance capabilities are supported through other Microsoft products.
Repository only works with MS SQL.
Requires additional software to use certain features in BizTalk 2002, Microsoft Operations Manager & Application Center.
To use a server with 8-32 processors it requires Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter, which must be purchased through an OEM.
Only runs on Microsoft/Intel platform and only supports XML Data Reduced (XDR) not XML Schema Definition (XSD).
Edited by: chandra kanth. k on Jun 10, 2008 8:14 AM

Advantages/Disadvantages to publishing to folder

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for