Advice for Building Small Network Question

Hello,
I am building a small network environment which will connect to a larger office, scalability is important.  We will begin having about 30 users which will all need VOIP services.  The VOIP services will be hosted by a cloud provider.  My question is as of now I am looking to obtain a Cisco 2921 ISR Router and then a Cisco 2960-X 48Gig POE, and my main question is I am confident the switch can handle the power and operation of the phones but just to make sure I should not run into any problems with the router as far as forwarding the data, correct?  Any other comments or suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Joe

Duplicate post. 
Go HERE.

Similar Messages

  • Advice on moving from workgroup to domain for very small network

    Hello all,
    I work for a small company and inherited the part time IT/Operations position and I want to understand the impact of changing from workgroup to domain.  I understand the process and I have set up small test domains before but I want to be certain I
    understand this so I figured I better ask the pros.
    The setup:
    1 Desktop class system, recent i5 quad, 16GB RAM, 1TB HD with Server 2008 R2.  Current roles are File Sharing and WSUS. 
    3 Desktops running Win 7 Home
    1 Desktop with win 7 Pro
    1 Laptop with Vista Home
    1 Laptop with Win 7
    1 Laptop with Win 8 Pro
    I have configured all devices to uses the WSUS for updates as they wanted these managed and this seems to be the easiest way.
    Right now all users have an account on the server that is used to map to their shares.  I know that the home versions cannot join to a domain and with this small of a network I don't want to join any device to a domain as we have only one server and
    it would not be reasonable to add more servers.
    The thing is they want to setup local sharing of calendars and contacts, etc.  I have 2010 exchange server and it is required to be on a domain.
    The Questions:
    Can the domain still "act" as a workgroup and users still connect to the shares and exchange without being joined to the domain?  What is the impact on performance for this server?  Will the home version users still be able to connect to
    the shares (I assume yes) and to the exchange through outlook?  Is there a better way to achieve the workgroup features of exchange without using exchange and not subscribing to Office 365?  We do not have an internet domain name for this business.
    Does this matter for setting up a domain?
    Anything you can think of that I should consider please feel free.
    Thank you all for your advice.

    Hi Paul,
    You are very welcome, I am very glad that my suggestions helped.
    For your first question, in a domain, the Domain Controller clearly has much more tasks to perform than a work group server, while it also has more management options for an administrator to better control his/her client machines.
    In addition, domain acts as a central management solution will reduce the work of the administrator. For an example, under workgroup mode, if we have multiple servers which have shared resources, we need to create the same user
    accounts on each of them, while in a domain, we only need to create accounts once on the DC, then all the accounts can be recognized across the whole domain, no matter how many servers and client machines are within it.
    For the second question, yes, single lable domain name is not recommended, but it is allowed. Single lable domains are supported in
    Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 1 (SP1) and Exchange 2010, while single label DNS name resolution is also possible.
    However, there are other Microsoft and third-party products which don’t support
    single lable domains. My suggestion is don’t use it while it will cause you trouble.
    More information for you:
    Single-Labeled Domain Names and Exchange 2007 SP1
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc788134(v=EXCHG.80).aspx
    Microsoft Exchange compatibility with Single Label Domains, Disjointed Namespaces, and Discontiguous Namespaces
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2269838
    Help and support for namespaces in Microsoft products including Single Label Domains (SLDs), Disjoint Namespaces, and Discontiguous Namespaces.
    http://support.microsoft.com/gp/gp_namespace_master#tab3
    Providing Single-Label DNS Name Resolution
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc816610(v=WS.10).aspx
    Regards,
    Amy

  • Hardware recommendations and advice for 100 client network

    Hi
    We are currently looking at setting up a very basic separate wireless network for a client in two adjacent large cabins (3m apart) that will support up to 100 clients max concurrently. This will be solely for contractors to access basic internet, connections to web mail etc. There will be no existing infrastructure to connect to, so we will be looking at an internet connection of some form, a small switch and the wireless network. Range isn't an issue as they are next to each other its the support for such a large amount of connections. I thought a clustered setup of 2-4 WAP321 might be a bit stretched and we might get issues as the number of simultaneous connections gets near 100. I was also looking at a couple of standalone Aironet 1600s, one in each cabin.
    The network itself is very basic, as it is literally just shared internet access but I need to ensure that it's reliable with 100 clients connected.
    I did ring presales tech but they weren't mcuh help and sounded like they knew less than me, so any help would be appreciated.
    Regards
    Harry

    Dear Harry,
    Thank you for reaching Small Business Support Community.
    By checking on the WAP321 datasheet I see:
    - Recommended user support = Up to 32 connective users, 20 active users
    - Active clients per cluster = 80
    I agree with you when say "might be a bit stretched and we might get issues as the number of simultaneous connections gets near 100", therefore I suggest you to go for an enterprise-class, entry-level device like the Aironet1600 you mention.  I would anyway suggest you to contact back the presales team or the Wireless-Mobility Support Community for further assistance and advice.
    Thank you for your time on this matter and please let me know if there is anything I may assist you with in the meantime.
    Kind regards,
    Jeffrey Rodriguez S. .:|:.:|:.
    Cisco Customer Support Engineer
    *Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

  • Need configuration exmamples for 3560 small network

    Hello,
    I'm currently doing some lab exercises in Packet Tracer.
    I'm trying to setup a small network with 2x 3560 switches and 3 vlans. 1 vlan for network management, one vlan for servers and one vlan for users.
    I'm running into issues where my lab exercises don't seem to work properly, and i'm not sure what im doing wrong. I learn fairly well "by example" and was wondering if anyone can point me to some examples of such a setup.

    further, here is the layout of my lab and the packet tracer file.
    here are the configs of my 2 3560. i've cut out ports no important to the lab
    CORE 3560
    Current configuration : 1399 bytes
    version 12.2
    no service timestamps log datetime msec
    no service timestamps debug datetime msec
    no service password-encryption
    hostname CORE
    ip routing
    no ip domain-lookup
    interface FastEthernet0/10
    switchport access vlan 10
    switchport mode access
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description link_to_closet_switch
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,10,20
    switchport mode trunk
    interface Vlan1
    ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan10
    description server_vlan
    ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan20
    description user_vlan
    ip address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0
    ip classless
    ============
    CLOSET 3560
    version 12.2
    no service timestamps log datetime msec
    no service timestamps debug datetime msec
    no service password-encryption
    hostname CLOSET
    ip routing
    no ip domain-lookup
    interface FastEthernet0/10
    switchport access vlan 20
    switchport mode access
    interface FastEthernet0/11
    switchport access vlan 20
    switchport mode access
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    description link_to_core_switch
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,10,20
    switchport mode trunk
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
    interface Vlan1
    ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan10
    description server_vlan
    no ip address
    interface Vlan20
    description user_vlan
    no ip address
    ip classless
    line con 0
    line vty 0 4
    login

  • Advice for creating a network

    I want to create a home network with the following:
    - a Mac Pro (acting as the server with the video, images, and audio files) in an office room
    - an Airport Express connected to powered speakers to play music in another room
    - an iTV connected to my television in the living room
    - an Airport Express connected to a laser jet printer and an ink jet printer in the office
    - a new Airport Extreme base station (not sure if I need this???)
    1.) Do I need an Airport Extreme base station to transfer video and other files
    from my Mac Pro to the iTV? Doesn't the iTV have a built in WiFi card?
    An Apple sales person told me I needed the new Airport Extreme station to flash the card in my Mac Pro?
    2.) Can two USB printers be connected to an Airport Express?
    3.) I already have the Airport Express connected to my powered speakers, and this network is called Tunes. When I setup a second Airport Express for the printers, should this have the same name as the other Airport Express? Does it matter?
    4.) Does this mean that when I turn on my airport on my notebook I will have to select from one of the different networks to connect to? How does this work since each Airport Express/Extreme will have a different name?
    Thanks!!!

    1.) So the only way to use the "n" speed of the iTV
    and the Mac Pro is to flash it with the new Airport
    Extreme Base Station? Is there any other way to do
    this without having to buy the Station just for
    this?
    At the moment the software is only available with the new Airport Extreme base station.
    2.) When setting up another Airport Express for
    printers, would I just set it up and provide the same
    name as used for the other Airport Express? OR do I
    somehow set it up so it joins the existing network?
    Join the existing network in client mode.
    What is client mode?
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=108040
    "By connecting one Airport Express (the one if the
    office) to your internet connection, this will be
    your wireless router."
    I have no Internet currently.
    It can still be your main wireless router even without an internet connection.
    3.) Is there somewhere that I need to designate a mac
    or an Airport Express as a "client?"
    Macs joining a wireless network are clients.
    An Airport Express can be a wireless router or configured as a client to a wireless network.
    What is client mode?
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=108040
    4.) What do you mean by "...and in theory you could
    use the Mac Pro as a software base station (instead
    of one of the Express units) ?" Do you mean I could
    use the Mac Pro somehow to send music and video
    without connecting it to an Airport Express or Base
    Station?
    Yes.
    System Preferences > Sharing Internet
    Share internet connection VIA Airport.
    I know you don't have an internet connection, but this sharing will configure your Mac Pro as a wireless base station to which you can connect other Macs and Airport Express units and the Apple TV.
    5.) Could my printers be connected to the Mac Pro and
    be available wirelessly to my notebook?
    Yes.

  • Building Small Network with Interconnected 2960Xs - No Connectivity

    I am trying to create a network with a client connected to a 2960X, which connects to a second 2960X switch, which connects to a server. I have setup the switch connected to the client with an IP address of 10.0.1.1 for its vlan1. The second switch has an IP address of 10.0.2.1 set for its vlan1. I then interconnected the two switches using the GigabitEthernet1/0/1 interface in trunking mode on each switch. I was not able to ping the second switch, so I then configured the GigabitEthernet1/0/2 interface in access mode and connected the two switches. I am still not able to ping the second switch from either side.
    What do I need to do to get this setup working? Should I be using a single VLAN that spans the two switches? Should I be using trunking or access mode for the interface that interconnects the two switches?

    That is correct, each switch has only one vlan, vlan1.
    Subnet mask is 255.255.255.0.
    Thanks, will change all interswitch connections to trunk. Will leave all host to switch connections at access.
    Unfortunately, I cannot post the output as it is from a terminal that cannot be connected to the Internet or even the Intranet and USB storage is not permitted in the area, so I cannot copy the output into a text file on a USB drive. I would have to type everything out. If there are parts of the sections of these commands that may be show the issue, please let me know and I can type up those sections.
    vlan interfaces are both up.

  • Advice for building computer for Adobe CC, mostly After Effects

    I am upgrading to a new computer.  I mostly work in After Effects, Photoshop and Illustrator.  Some work in Premiere. Also using Zaxwerks ProAnimator for 3D.
    My first and main concern is about drives.  I am going with SSD's.
    Will there be a significant enough performance difference between SATA and SAS?
    with using SSD's is there a need to have separate drives for cache, source files, rendered files or will the read/write be ok using just one drive?
    Other than that, does anyone see any issues with the following system I'm planning to purchase? NOTE - no need for raid for secondary drives.  We have source files on server and I pull them down as needed.
    LENOVO ThinkStation P700
    Processor:
    2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 Processor (25MB Cache, 2.30GHz) (10 core chips)
    Operating System:
    Windows 8.1 Pro 64
    Memory Selection:
    4x 16GB DDR4 2133MHz (2Rx4) ECC RDIMM (64GB total)
    Video Adapter:
    NVIDIA Quadro K5200 6G (2DVI+2DP)
    Hard Drive Controller:
    8port SATA/SAS RAID Flex Adapter
    Primary HDD RAID Configuration:
    RAID 1 (2 HDDs MIN)
    1st HDD selection:
    2.5" 512GB SATA Solid State Drive
    Additional HDD selection:
    3x 2.5" 200GB SAS Solid State Drive (1 for cache, 1 for source files, 1 for final renders)
    Power Supply:
    Tower 850W 92%
    Thanks in advance for all replies.

    1 - moved to the Hardware forum
    2 - read all the articles at Tweakers Page

  • Best DSfW Design for new small Tree

    I looking to build a replacement tree and server infrastructure for a small network, 80-90 users at a single location, with the possibility of adding 1 or 2 additional locations in the future. I want/need to make it as Active Directory friendly as possible for use by Microsoft SQL Server and VMware View. The current tree structure is O=parent company down to OU=company down to OU=city and then OUs for each server (file, print, and email) and OU=users for users, groups, profiles, and templates.
    Ex: someuser.users.moosejaw.rocketpacks.acme for a user. fileserver.moosejaw.rocketpacks.acme for a server OU.
    My question is do I do a name-mapped install or a non-name-mapped install for maximum AD compatibility, I can design the tree however best suits the task so whichever approach makes the most sense works for me.
    Oh, FYI, fully virtualized infrastructure VMware vSphere 5.1, single purposed virtual servers for each task, DsfW, File, Print, SQL, etc...
    Thanks,
    Tracy

    tcarlton sounds like they 'said':
    > Well since its a new install I could install DSfW first as a
    > non-name-mapped tree or I could install DSfW later in the process
    > AFTER having built a �Traditional� eDir tree instead. My
    > question is, given the environment, which is a better approach, if
    > any, and what are pitfalls of each approach.
    So my response to tcarlton's comment is...
    Hmmmm, well if your current tree makes sense to all involved, might be
    just as easy to do a name-mapped install at your parent company level.
    With OES11, your DSFW domain can span multiple partitions, and this way
    all your users, etc would be in your domain.
    Stevo

  • Best setup for a small iMac network with NAS?

    Hello all,
    Any recommendations on how to setup a small network with 3 machines and mutiple users?
    We run a design studio and currently have 3 x 27" iMacs with a couple of laptops that come and go, that all connect to a Synology DS213 NAS drive. (All the iMacs are connected to the NAS via ethernet through a gigabit switch, so we have a reliable connection)
    All 3 machines have just had their HD's replaced (all backup up to the NAS) and are currently blank canvases - so I'm keen to get a decent network system up and running that works well in conjunction with the NAS drive. They're all running 10.6.8, but I'm happy to put them on Mountain Lion and install OSX server. It seems most feedback isn't great, but I'm interested to hear any ideas,
    Thanks in advance..

    Rick may be right because although i didnt think of it before i tend to have notoriuosly long classnames for my php classes and i have used samba on occasion (when rsync is out of the question for one reason or another) and never had a problem. I use kubuntu (feisty at the moment )with an ext3 filesystem. if i have a chance this evening ill give it a try and see what happens.
    You could also possibly use FUSE to use an ssh filesystem for the shares... i don tknow how that would figure in your back up though.
    Also if worse comes to worse you could tar or dmg the the necessary files... just some thoughts.
    Ill be interested to know what you end up implementing....
    OH one last thought... Compile Darwin from source and use that as your server

  • Just looking for some advice for a Networking 'noob'

    Hey folks,
    I manage the post-production workflow for a small agency. We're getting ready to move into a new office space, and we'll be looking to make some upgrades to our video workflow and data management.
    At the current time, we have two G5s (PowerPCs) and a new Intel Mac Pro. We may be adding a fourth (or even fifth) workstation. We shoot everything on the DVX (24p DV), but we're also (strongly) considering upgrading to an HD workflow and investing in a few HVX packages so we can have the option of shooting 720p. We will NOT be shooting anything higher than that, (no uncompressed, digibeta, no 1080p, etc.)
    Right now, when we need to access media from other computers, we simply use the AppleTalk feature of our internal ethernet and mount the drives remotely. This actually works fairly well, and we usually don't have any issues with latency. But it becomes frustrating at times when we want to search for a particular media file or FCP project file and we can't remember which drive it was stored on. We'd like to have all of our editing workstations be able to access the same media simultaneously in one shared 'Mother Ship.'
    I guess my question is: What should we get? Final Cut Server? G-Raid? Xsan?
    I'm not really an IT guy, so I can't say I really know the differences between these different options, but any advice you can offer would be most appreciated.
    And as for budget, we're prob looking to spend something in the range of $8,000-$10,000 dollars on this new system. (that's NOT including the HVXs, of course.
    qp

    Ok... here we go, not sure what you are doing except editing DV right now,
    but this will work for HDV, DVCPROHD, Uncompressed SD and some ProRes
    as long as you have a good Gigabit Router to transfer files. Please consult
    a professional if this sounds scary to you.
    *Redundant FILE SERVER* for project files, important stuff
    1. Install at least 4GB RAM in G5 #1 (max $200)
    3. Make sure there are two identical SATA drives in the G5. Install OSX Leopard Server ($499) on 1 drive. Use Carbon Copy Cloner (Free... http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html) and clone
    the main drive to SATA drive #2 when drive #1 is set up completely. Use drive #2 as backup.
    4. Connect CalDigit 2.56TB HDOne External Hard Drive Array (RAID-5) with PCI-X adapter ($2830)
    SubTotal: $3600...ish
    *Current MacPro* Add unprotected scratch disk for main edit suite
    1. Install Sonnet Tempo SATA e4p Serial ATA Host Adapter ($260)
    2. Connect Sonnet 2.5TB Fusion D500P eSATA Array System (RAID-0) ($1700)
    Subtotal: $2000...ish
    *2nd G5* convert to p2 Logging/backup Station
    1. Sony BWU-200S Internal 4x Blu-ray Disc Rewritable Drive (599.95)
    2. Roxio Toast ($85)
    SubTotal: $700
    *NEW Intel MacPro* will increase productivity
    1. 8 Core 3ghz Intel MacPro ($3600)
    Total: Around 9900-10,000
    (Buy from PowerMax.com or other out of state vendor to avoid sales tax)
    If you want to organize things, then FCS will help. You can install
    on G5#2 for 999.00 more. I would focus on hardware first though.

  • I need some advice on a small servers network please !!

    hi every one.
    i need a small help please.
    i have a collage project that is upgrading a network and my part is the server's network. actually it is 65servers, windows and non-win.
    i wish to know what are the important issues that should be considered in connecting the servers with the rest of the enterprise?
    i thought of some,but i need some deatails how to start working on it;
    pls add any more or try to explain what do you think should be done in it:
    *trafic analysis, but where?
    *redundancy and failure backup
    *security
    *authorization, is VLANs sufficiant?
    *server loads, how to calculate it?
    Is there a special topology for server networks?or layering?
    regards;
    naif

    There is a layered model for building infrastructure
    core layer
    distribution layer
    access layer
    The core layer needs to be fast most of the time layer 2 on some optical systems
    Then you have the distribution layer. this is where you connect your servers and traffic analysing on layer 3. (like Cat6500 switches)
    Then the access layer thats where you connect the end nodes. (like Cat4500 switches or 2950)
    It is wise to segment your network into different VLAN's Like a seperate server VLAN and some client VLAN's, number of client VLAN's depents on the number of end nodes.
    You can use multi layer switches (a MSFC card in 6500 switch) for routing between the VLAN's
    For redundancy you can use for example 2 6500 switches with MSFC where you implement HSRP to have redundant gateways for clients and servers
    For security you have to create some access-lists on the VLAN interfaces on the MSFC so you can implement traffic filtering between VLAN's
    Do you also have a internet connection (firewallzone) in that case create a sepearate VLAN in which you connect the (PIX)firewall.
    Do you need any more information?
    Regards,
    Maarten

  • I want to create a SWF for my small web site. How do I do this? Do I need to purchase "Flash Builder"?

    I want to create a SWF for my small web site. How do I do this? Do I need to purchase "Flash Builder"?

    Hi Developer_46038, 
    if for example all the properties and object are stated as list, i think there is a tool that overcome cross list.
    http://listrollup.codeplex.com/
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/13a51be5-4007-46e8-bbb2-5e04320dfebd/cross-list-webpart?forum=sharepointcustomizationlegacy
    you can also using dataview webpart to show the cross lists:
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint-designer-help/create-a-data-view-HA010094804.aspx
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint-designer-help/connect-two-data-views-HA010169133.aspx
    3rd party: http://community.bamboosolutions.com/blogs/bambooteamblog/archive/2009/03/11/relational-database-capabilities-for-sharepoint-lists-cross-list-web-part.aspx
    but i am not quite sure how crystal report will do, if you can make the crystal report as also list, i think its possible, 
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/8247edf5-dee8-49d8-b7ee-9e49bfd97b9b/crystal-report-in-sharepoint-2010-webpart?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
    Regards,
    Aries
    Microsoft Online Community Support
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Any suggestions for building a home network (in a modest...

    Any suggestions for building a home network (in a modest 1600 sq. ft. home) with the following requirements...
    1) Laptop(s) and PC share broadband (cable) internet connection
    2) Access files on PC from laptop(s) and vice versa
    3) PC and laptop(s) share printer (Canon Pixma 610)
    4) Send media on PC to TV
    5) Send music to wireless speakers (not purchased yet)
    Note hardware specs:
    A) One laptop runs on Windows XP and has an Intel PRO wireless 2915ABG network connection
    B) PC runs Windows XP Media Center
    I was thinking about the wireless N broadband router 300.  From the experiences of the community, will I be able to achieve my goal?  Beside a PC adapter, is there any other hardware I will need?
    A couple other questions.
    The router will likely be sitting right next to my PC.  Does the PC need to have a wireless adapter or can it be wired from the router to the PC?
    When will the media extender be available?  Will it work with Windows XP?
    Thank you.
    Chris

    I personally might not buy Wireless-N, but the idea of being on the bleeding edge is nice.
    Anyway, whichever router you choose, you should be able to accomplish almost everything you need.
    You'll be able to share your internet amongst all of the computers, and share files between them all. Local firewalls and permission settings on individual computers could potentially pose a problem.
    Sending media to your TV may or may not be possible, depending on what other hardware you have. A router itself would not be able to do that, as a TV doesn't usually have any form of WiFi, but if you had a box connected to it for displaying content on the TV, you could do something like that...
    Wireless speakers are generally a separate wireless system. As far as I know, there is a wireless transmitter that sits next to the amp (or other sound source), and broadcasts the music wirelessly to the speakers. You'd have to make sure the speakers and wireless router are on different channels as to not cause interference.
    Don't know much about the media extender, but highly likely will be compatible with XP.

  • Advice on creating small Mac office network

    Hello there!
    I am setting up a small network for a non-profit organization, and came up with a few problems.
    The main one being that I cannot send anything to print from Mac Minis on groud floor, to printer.
    In order to make myself clear I have produced a graphic scheme of the network set up.
    Everything runs on DHCP, excepto for printer that has a set IP.
    I also wonder if I should change any IP on this network to fixed instead of DHCP...
    Any help: much appreciated!

    It looks like you have set up a basic roaming network. Please double check the following Apple Support article on the details on how these types of networks are configured to make sure nothing was missed when you setup yours.

  • Need a product recommendation for small network

    Hello All!
    I just started a small computer and network consulting company (in addition to my "day job"). I work for a huge company with several hundred sites, all Cisco networking of course. I am also setting up a small network and computer consulting company to do on the side and will be dealing with small companies and helping them with their network needs. Anyway, I am looking for a entry level Cisco product because my Linksys just isn't going to cut it any more. I want to set up 3 servers and I currently have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I want something that would operate like a PIX515 firewall but that would obviously be overkill for what I am doing. I want the capability to set up port forwarding to the inside from my 5 external IP's. Wi-Fi isn't critical but would be a "nice to have" if it didn't cost too much more. What would be a good product for my needs? I want a NICE CISCO product but not an EXPENSIVE one, either. I am also interested in certification and possibly becoming a VAR soon. Any pointers would be much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    --GREG--

    I would steer clear of the 500 express. Since you seem to be new to cisco products, I would use the opportunity and buy what most of your potential customers already have. Get yourself a pix/asa and a 2900 series switch as first poster suggested. If you are interested in certifications, you will need to learn the command line interface. The 500 express will do you no good as it is all gui. This is only my opinion of course. Oh, and did I see not expensive and cisco in the same sentence. :)

Maybe you are looking for