Advice on Setting up Exchange 2013
I put this in the Hyper-V forum because the questions I have are more related to overall Hyper-V config than Exchange. Since I am more familiar with VMWare, I do not know if the concept I have on Hyper-V is correct for Exchange. We have two Hyper-V hosts
connected to an EMC SAN via 10GB iSCSI. On the SAN, we created the Storage Pool and LUNs to handle the Exchange 2013 databases and Logs. The Hyper-V environment already had a CSV for the various VMs and that seems to work nicely. We created the Exchange
VMs in there as well. Now, to add the LUNs for the databases and logs, we also created CSV out of all those LUNs and then started to create virtual hard disks (.vhdx format) to fill up the LUNs. This was done through the Settings on the Exchange 2013 VMs using
a SCSI controller.
So, my question is, should the databases and LUNs be CSVs or should we do this some other way that will allow the VMs to failover and still maintain a connection to the storage. I read about Pass-Through disks and iSCSI within the VM itself, but both of
these seem to have either failover issues or performance issues. So what are my options here?
Thanks.
MCITP Exchange 2010 | MCITP Lync Server 2010 | MCTS Windows 2008
Yes, see the recommendations from the Exchange team.
A search immediately took me here:
Best Practices for Virtualizing & Managing Exchange 2013
<cite>download.microsoft.com/download/4/A/C/4AC32FD3-220E-45DC-AA97...</cite>
Best Practices for Virtualizing and Managing Exchange 2013 6 6 Target Audience This guide is intended for IT professionals and technical decision makers (TDMs ...
Brian Ehlert
http://ITProctology.blogspot.com
Learn. Apply. Repeat.
Similar Messages
-
I Have an exchange 2013 email account which isn't registered as part of my iCloud account.
i Use my outlook calendar (exch) for work and the same exch calendar day to day from all my iOS devices.
when a colleague or outside email away from my company sends me a calendar meeting request, it works fine. (Using my exch email as the invite recipient).
my girlfriend sends me a meeting request from her hotmail account using the same exch email address for me, but he. Invites always arrive to my iCloud/iCal calendar instead! I can't seem to change it so I often miss diary notes or reminders unless I constantly look at both calendars.
i Just want to use exchange calendar and lose iCal (or if easier sync both iCal and exchange calendars vica versa - but that may be over complicating the issue, basically I just need one calendar and would rather it be my outlook exchange cal)
any ideas?Hello again,
False alarm..... it didnt work sorry.
I removed the iCal accounts from my mac, and also from my iphone. Then when my partner sent me a calendar invite it simply didnt arrive at all!
She has a hotmail account installed on her IOS iphone 5.
She is sending the invite to my exch 2013 email address which is not associated with any icloud account.
My exch 2013 email is installed in both my Outlook for mac 2011 and IOS device Iphone 5s.
When I switch the iCloud Calendar back on in my iphone 5s, the invite comes through but ONLY optional to the icloud calendar. I cannot seem to get it receiving on my default calendar which is set to Exchange 2013 account.
Its very strange as its only her invites that do this. Anyone else's come through on my exchange calendar because its the same email address receeving it my end. -
Unable to connect to Exchange 2013 using Outlook 2010/2013 with latest patch
Dear All,
I'm setting up Exchange 2013 CU2 coexist with Exchange 2010 SP3. Since we are still planning and testing, the internet is still pointing to 2010 for send/receive mails.
The 2013 environment are:-
2 X CAS server with MS NLB configured
2X MBX server with DA
Internal NLB/licent access: excas2013.int.my.domain
External access (current set on 2010 as well): webmail.my.domain
Certificate with valid subject name has been import to 2013 and 2010:
CN: webmail.mydomain
SAN: excas2013.int.my.domain
SAN: excas.int.my.domain (for 2010)
I am able to connect to my Exchange 2010 user thru 2013 CAS server and proxy to exhcnage 2010 by outlook. However, I cannot connect to Exchange 2013 user by outlook. During mail profile create of Exchange 2013 user by autodiscover (pointed to exchange 2013),
the process looks good:-
Establish network connection (checked)
Searching for [email protected] server settings (checked)
Log on to server
The process stop at "Log on to server" and a windows prompt, saying:
The action cannot be completed. The connection to Microsoft Exchange is unavailable. Outlook must be online or connected to complete this action.
Clicked OK, I can see:-
MS Exchange Server:
[email protected]
Mailbox:
=SMPT:[email protected]
WHen I click "Check Name", it said The name cannot be resolved.
I have no idea of what is going on. Just want some help~I have checked the iis log:-
2013-09-23 06:58:29 10.144.144.71 POST /autodiscover/autodiscover.xml &cafeReqId=99ed5467-a294-481c-95eb-9b21d6530404; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4 Microsoft+Office/14.0+(Windows+NT+6.1;+Microsoft+Outlook+14.0.7106;+Pro) 200 0 0 8018
2013-09-23 06:58:29 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=f4652a19-2e8e-4652-a007-0cf0b7fb792e&cafeReqId=f4652a19-2e8e-4652-a007-0cf0b7fb792e; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
0
2013-09-23 06:58:29 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=c48cda77-6008-423b-8e8b-d6d40f4d1b39&cafeReqId=c48cda77-6008-423b-8e8b-d6d40f4d1b39; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
0
2013-09-23 06:58:29 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=033f1ce4-43ba-49b1-b226-f4cc357e7702&cafeReqId=033f1ce4-43ba-49b1-b226-f4cc357e7702; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074252
15
2013-09-23 06:58:29 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=d2424d25-ca9e-4867-922f-e527b041d9db&cafeReqId=d2424d25-ca9e-4867-922f-e527b041d9db; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 64 0
2013-09-23 06:58:31 10.144.144.73 POST /autodiscover/autodiscover.xml &cafeReqId=ff35f49b-e418-4d55-b66c-dbae509cc12f; 443 - 10.144.92.17 Microsoft+Office/12.0+(Windows+NT+5.1;+Microsoft+Office+Outlook+12.0.6662;+Pro) 401 1 2148074254 0
2013-09-23 06:58:31 10.144.144.73 POST /autodiscover/autodiscover.xml &cafeReqId=033f8ed6-d7ce-41b2-8ed2-e275e22e53be; 443 mydomain\tkchung 10.144.92.17 Microsoft+Office/12.0+(Windows+NT+5.1;+Microsoft+Office+Outlook+12.0.6662;+Pro) 200 0 64 15
2013-09-23 06:58:37 10.144.144.71 POST /powershell serializationLevel=Full;ExchClientVer=15.0.712.24;clientApplication=ManagementShell;TargetServer=;PSVersion=3.0&sessionID=Version_15.0_(Build_711.24)=rJqNiZqNgbqnsr3Py9GWkYvRlZqc0ZyQkoHOxsvOxsbJzczNgcbQzczQzc/OzN/Ixc/KxczI376y&cafeReqId=5350aa81-6668-489e-b099-3b3647115f10;
80 mydomain\Administrator 10.144.144.71 Microsoft+WinRM+Client 500 0 0 180040
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=f961c596-efff-4696-9188-611a0d151601&cafeReqId=f961c596-efff-4696-9188-611a0d151601; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
0
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=753d8852-ce19-459c-ac78-849c3e51e0a1&cafeReqId=753d8852-ce19-459c-ac78-849c3e51e0a1; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
15
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=c9e86049-c883-4b03-8546-143909361a80&cafeReqId=c9e86049-c883-4b03-8546-143909361a80; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4
MSRPC 404 0 64 78
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=327ace4c-b2c8-44c1-95ba-7871727f60ef&cafeReqId=327ace4c-b2c8-44c1-95ba-7871727f60ef; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4
MSRPC 200 0 64 109
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6004&RequestId=a7c8daa9-e458-4f2d-b388-7300e8679dcd&cafeReqId=a7c8daa9-e458-4f2d-b388-7300e8679dcd; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
15
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6004&RequestId=c40afede-dd8f-4ac7-a3dd-827872bb2e76&cafeReqId=c40afede-dd8f-4ac7-a3dd-827872bb2e76; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
15
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6004&RequestId=2dc56148-1900-4044-b72a-4b13e5e871f0&cafeReqId=2dc56148-1900-4044-b72a-4b13e5e871f0; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4
MSRPC 404 0 64 15
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6004&RequestId=9475aad3-9537-4dac-86cb-6fdb187fa148&cafeReqId=9475aad3-9537-4dac-86cb-6fdb187fa148; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4
MSRPC 200 0 64 31
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=11a54e96-d8d8-4649-8e01-f8138ebf7b8d&cafeReqId=11a54e96-d8d8-4649-8e01-f8138ebf7b8d; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
0
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=b1a3e503-1077-4144-84df-fcdb65a7eea4&cafeReqId=b1a3e503-1077-4144-84df-fcdb65a7eea4; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
15
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=5b5639ba-4c91-4351-bda6-bcec46d6b218&cafeReqId=5b5639ba-4c91-4351-bda6-bcec46d6b218; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4
MSRPC 404 0 0 15
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6002&RequestId=f200806f-3294-4210-8940-e3fee0385ccd&cafeReqId=f200806f-3294-4210-8940-e3fee0385ccd; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4
MSRPC 200 0 64 46
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6004&RequestId=675d6515-85da-43fa-9cd8-0a18ac06a71f&cafeReqId=675d6515-85da-43fa-9cd8-0a18ac06a71f; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
0
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6004&RequestId=b97b2c3e-5309-4927-8330-fe0f339b5930&cafeReqId=b97b2c3e-5309-4927-8330-fe0f339b5930; 443 - 10.144.85.4 MSRPC 401 1 2148074254
0
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6004&RequestId=504d462a-db21-4e4b-8568-79e4099d78c1&cafeReqId=504d462a-db21-4e4b-8568-79e4099d78c1; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4
MSRPC 404 0 0 31
2013-09-23 06:58:46 10.144.144.71 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6004&RequestId=b4757b1e-8428-454a-91df-ca0a2153144f&cafeReqId=b4757b1e-8428-454a-91df-ca0a2153144f; 443 mydomain\training101 10.144.85.4
MSRPC 200 0 64 46 -
SSL error when trying to sync tasks to Exchange 2013
I followed the documentation on setting up exchange 2013 and SharePoint 2013 for task synchronization. When I try to sync the tasks to outlook, i get an error telling me that the user mailbox on exchange may not support task synchronization. when i look
in the ULS logs in sharepoint i see the following error:
An operation failed because the following certificate has validation errors: Subject Name: CN=localhost.localdomain Issuer Name: CN=localhost.localdomain Thumbprint: 5D64E20B424D4A613288024734CAD805A1BD7B0E Errors: SSL policy errors have been encountered. Error code '0x6'..
Problem is i don't know what certificate this is reffering to. Has anyone seen this issue before or can give me any advise on tracking down this certificate? the cn=localhost cn=localdomain is confusing to me.IsSelfIssuer : True
NameId :
[email protected]
RegisteredIssuerName :
[email protected]
IdentityClaimTypeInformation : Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPTrustedClaimTypeInformation
Description :
SigningCertificate : [Subject]
CN=Microsoft Exchange Server Auth Certificate
[Issuer]
CN=Microsoft Exchange Server Auth Certificate
[Serial Number]
608E9FC955BFE4984AAE55D83CA59A04
[Not Before]
12/4/2012 12:08:28 PM
[Not After]
11/8/2017 12:08:28 PM
[Thumbprint]
16C0746EE25DA6CC718BCCF297F8C6E70EFB0908
AdditionalSigningCertificates : {}
MetadataEndPoint :
https://ex-cas.domain.com/autodiscover/metadata/json/1
IsAutomaticallyUpdated : True
Name : Exchange
TypeName : Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPTr
ustedSecurityTokenService
DisplayName : Exchange
Id : 42563965-6ae1-4a71-a959-77510f5ab1a7
Status : Online
Parent : SPSecurityTokenServiceManager
Name=SecurityTokenServiceManager
Version : 935681
Properties : {}
Farm : SPFarm Name=SharePoint_Config
UpgradedPersistedProperties : {} -
GSSAPI with IMAP on Exchange 2013 SP1
We are setting up Exchange 2013 SP1 in our Exchange 2010 test environment to verify our upcoming migration. I have found out that for some reason I can't get the IMAP service in Exchange 2013 to work with Kerberos (GSSAPI) authentication with Thunderbird
as a client. It does work fine in Exchange 2010 SP3 though.
Exchange 2010 SP3 response in Thunderbird:
* CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 AUTH=NTLM AUTH=GSSAPI AUTH=PLAIN UIDPLUS CHILDREN IDLE NAMESPACE LITERAL+
Exchange 2013 SP1 response in Thunderbird:
* CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 AUTH=PLAIN UIDPLUS CHILDREN IDLE NAMESPACE LITERAL+
AUTH=GSSAPI is missing and therefore I can't blame Thunderbird from complaining about this. If I compare the output from Get-ImapSettings I can't find anything that would indicate why I shouldn't work. EnableGSSAPIAndNTLMAuth is $true on both server
and LoginType is SecureLogin.
On
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj619283(v=exchg.150).aspx I found out that NTLM is not supported on Exchange 2013 for POP3 and IMAP4 but Kerberos (GSSAPI) and Plain Text Authentication with SSL still is.
Has anyone got IMAP to work with Kerberos authentication on Exchange 2013 SP1?Hello,
According to your description, we are unable to see the AUTH=GSSAPI in Exchange 2013.
My environment is Exchange 2013 CU1. I get the same result as yours. Looks Like Exchange 2013 IMAP does not support GSSAPI as authentication mechanism.
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support -
Publish Exchange 2013 OWA + Active Sync + Outlook Anywhere using TMG 2010
We plan to publish our new Exchange 2013 SP1 servers (3 in DAG) outside corporate network using TMG 2010. I am looking for some guide how to do it in the proper way. What I found is little old and does not take into consideration Exchange 2013
SP1
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx
Any advice how to publish Exchange 2013 OWA using form-based authentication and how to use Kerberos Constrained Delegation?Hi,
The blog below describes some scenarios about publishing Exchange. You could have a look the Scenario 2.
Exchange publishing after TMG/UAG
http://dizdarevic.ba/ddamirblog/?p=168
Note: Microsoft provides third-party contact information to help you find technical support. This contact
information may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this third-party contact information
Best Regards,
Joyce
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place. -
How to configure Exchange 2013 OWA with Single Sign On
Hi All ,
How to configure Exchange 2013 OWA with Single Sign On ?
Thanks .Hi,
From your description, I am not quite sure what you really want to achieve. Could you explain it furthermore? If you need to set up Exchange 2013 OWA single sign on with Exchange 2010, here is a helpful thread for your reference.
Exchange 2013 OWA Single Sign on with Exchange 2010
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/2899ebfc-8622-4cdc-8d77-d76b607618f7/exchange-2013-owa-single-sign-on-with-exchange-2010?forum=exchangesvrdeploy
If that is not your case, please feel free to tell me.
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 Installation Issues
Let's document my frustrations with installing and setting up Exchange 2013 on my Server 2012 Standard Edition Server.Steps taken before hitting install:Installed Server 2012 Standard and rebootedCreated a VSS for posterity sake.Downloaded CU2 fromhereInstalled Server Roles in PowerShell: Install-WindowsFeature RSAT-ADDSInstall-WindowsFeature AS-HTTP-Activation, Desktop-Experience, NET-Framework-45-Features, RPC-over-HTTP-proxy, RSAT-Clustering, Web-Mgmt-Console, WAS-Process-Model, Web-Asp-Net45, Web-Basic-Auth, Web-Client-Auth, Web-Digest-Auth, Web-Dir-Browsing, Web-Dyn-Compression, Web-Http-Errors, Web-Http-Logging, Web-Http-Redirect, Web-Http-Tracing, Web-ISAPI-Ext, Web-ISAPI-Filter, Web-Lgcy-Mgmt-Console, Web-Metabase, Web-Mgmt-Console, Web-Mgmt-Service, Web-Net-Ext45, Web-Request-Monitor, Web-Server, Web-Stat-Compression,...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks CommunityHi,
As additional, I want to double confirm whether external user cannot receive message send from your environment and contain attachment, or cannot send message with attachment for external mail flow.
If it’s the former, it means mail flow works fine in your environment. You can contact administrator for destination forest to check attachment filter and transport rule.
If it’s the latter, this issue may be caused in your own configuration. We can check anti-spam filter, transport rule and send connector, run message track log and protocol log to find out the node for this issue.
More details about Anti-Spam and Antivirus Mail Flow, for your reference:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997242(v=exchg.141).aspx
Thanks
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Allen Wang
TechNet Community Support -
Method to use Set-EventLogLevel against all the Exchange 2013 servers.
Recently Ran into an issue where we needed to troubleshoot an issue that required us to turn up the logging level across multiple exchange servers using the Set-EventLogLevel command.
I was trying to figure out a way to run this command without having to go to each of the exchange servers.
PSSession doesn't work because then your not running the exchange commandlets on that remote system.
Invoke-Command doesn't work either.
Unfortunately because of some security settings using Connect-ExchangeServer doesn't proxy in the command either.
So any ideas on how we can execute an exchange cmdlet against multiple exchange servers from powershell.
Jeff CI can set it via this method on Exchange 2010, I don't have Exchange 2013 in front of me but it should be same I believe.
This will set MSExchangeIS\9000 Private\Logons level from Lowest to Low of all the Exchange server in my environment
$test = Get-ExchangeServer
$test | %{Set-eventloglevel "$_\MSExchangeIS\9000 Private\Logons" -Level Low}
To see if those are set or not run this...
$test | %{get-eventloglevel "$_\MSExchangeIS\9000 Private\Logons"}
Blog
|
Get your Exchange Powershell Tip of the Day from here -
How to set initial size for mailbox in Exchange 2013?
Hello All!
I've installed Exchange 2013.
Now I'd like to check Backup/Restore of some DataBase.
For thist I look for some way to create Bulk of Mailboxes in DataBase and to set some initial size 50-100Mb for each.
Thanks a lot!
BR,
PavelHi
In your testing creating bulk mailboxes alone will not help . We need to populate some data's in the databases so that the databases are written with some values and they contain some data.
For your testing with backup
First you need to create few number of mailboxes.
Populate those mailboxes by sending more emails.
delete those emails and then try restoring those emails from the backup or if its testing QA server then you can dismount any databases delete few log files and try to restore them from your backup
Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on http://exchangequery.com Thanks Sathish
(MVP) -
Exchange 2013 CU2, Alert for OWA Health set unhealthy from SCOM 2012
I am facing issue in Exchange 2013 CU2, I got this alert from SCOM 2012 atleast 5-6 times a day, OWA health set is unhealthy, I have done all the steps mentioned in this web link. Authentication type for OWA Virtual directory is integrated windows and Basic.
I have 2 CAS servers, and this alert generated from both of them.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms.exch.scom.OWA(EXCHG.150).aspx?v=15.0.712.24
Alert: Health Set unhealthy
Source: EX-CAS - OWA
Path: EX-CAS;EX-CAS
Last modified by: System
Last modified time: 1/5/2014 8:15:08 PM
Alert description: Outlook Web Access logon is failing on ClientAccess server EX-CAS.
Availability has dropped to 0%. You can find protocol level traces for the failures on C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Logging\Monitoring\OWA\ClientAccessProbe.
Incident start time: 1/6/2014 4:05:08 AM
Last failed result:
Failing Component - Owa
Failure Reason - CafeFailure
Exception:
System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.ScenarioException:
Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.ScenarioException:
Failure source: Owa
Failure reason: CafeFailure
Failing component:Owa
Exception hint: CafeErrorPage: CafeFailure Unauthorized Inner exception: Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException
ErrorPageFailureReason: CafeFailure, RequestFailureContext: FailurePoint=FrontEnd, HttpStatusCode=401, Error=Unauthorized, Details=, HttpProxySubErrorCode=, WebExceptionStatus=
Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException: An error occurred on the Client Access server while processing the request
WebExceptionStatus: Success
GET https://localhost/owa/ HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; MSEXCHMON; ACTIVEMONITORING; OWACTP)
Accept: */*
Cache-Control: no-cache
X-OWA-ActionName: Monitoring
Cookie:
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
request-id: 211474d2-a43e-4fab-8038-3aab35353568
X-FailureContext: FrontEnd;401;VW5hdXRob3JpemVk;;;
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate,NTLM,Basic realm="localhost"
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-FEServer: EX-CAS
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 04:14:47 GMT
Content-Length: 0
Response time: 0s
---> Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException: Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException
ErrorPageFailureReason: CafeFailure, RequestFailureContext: FailurePoint=FrontEnd, HttpStatusCode=401, Error=Unauthorized, Details=, HttpProxySubErrorCode=, WebExceptionStatus=
Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException: An error occurred on the Client Access server while processing the request
WebExceptionStatus: Success
GET https://localhost/owa/ HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; MSEXCHMON; ACTIVEMONITORING; OWACTP)
Accept: */*
Cache-Control: no-cache
X-OWA-ActionName: Monitoring
Cookie:
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
request-id: 211474d2-a43e-4fab-8038-3aab35353568
X-FailureContext: FrontEnd;401;VW5hdXRob3JpemVk;;;
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate,NTLM,Basic realm="localhost"
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-FEServer: EX-CAS
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 04:14:47 GMT
Content-Length: 0
Response time: 0s
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.BaseExceptionAnalyzer.Analyze(TestId currentTestStep, HttpWebRequestWrapper request, HttpWebResponseWrapper response, Exception exception, Action`1 trackingDelegate)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.HttpSession.AnalyzeResponse[T](HttpWebRequestWrapper request, HttpWebResponseWrapper response, Exception exception, HttpStatusCode[] expectedStatusCodes, Func`2 processResponse)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.HttpSession.EndSend[T](IAsyncResult result, HttpStatusCode[] expectedStatusCodes, Func`2 processResponse, Boolean fireResponseReceivedEvent)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.HttpSession.EndGet[T](IAsyncResult result, HttpStatusCode[] expectedStatusCodes, Func`2 processResponse)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.Authenticate.AuthenticationResponseReceived(IAsyncResult result)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.BaseTestStep.EndExecute(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.Owa.OwaLogin.AuthenticationCompleted(IAsyncResult result)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.BaseTestStep.EndExecute(IAsyncResult result)
at System.Threading.Tasks.TaskFactory`1.FromAsyncCoreLogic(IAsyncResult iar, Func`2 endFunction, Action`1 endAction, Task`1 promise, Bool
States of all monitors within the health set:
Note: Data may be stale. To get current data, run: Get-ServerHealth -Identity 'EX-CAS' -HealthSet 'OWA'
State
Name
TargetResource HealthSet
AlertValue ServerComponent
NotApplicable OwaCtpMonitor
OWA
Unhealthy None
States of all health sets:
Note: Data may be stale. To get current data, run: Get-HealthReport -Identity 'EX-CAS'
State
HealthSet
AlertValue LastTransitionTime
MonitorCount
NotApplicable ActiveSync
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:13 AM
2
NotApplicable AD
Healthy 11/24/2013 6:54:18 AM
10
NotApplicable ECP
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:03:05 AM
1
Online
Autodiscover.Proxy
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:06:37 AM
1
NotApplicable Autodiscover
Healthy 1/3/2014 10:18:17 PM
2
Online
ActiveSync.Proxy
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:06:37 AM
1
Online
ECP.Proxy
Healthy
11/21/2013 6:16:08 PM 4
Online
EWS.Proxy
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:06:37 AM
1
Online
OutlookMapi.Proxy
Healthy 11/24/2013 6:54:28 AM
4
Online
OAB.Proxy
Healthy 11/19/2013 7:14:34 PM
1
Online
OWA.Proxy
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:06:37 AM
2
NotApplicable EDS
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:56 AM
10
Online
RPS.Proxy
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:27 AM
13
Online
RWS.Proxy Healthy
1/3/2014 5:20:09 AM 10
Online
Outlook.Proxy
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:12 AM
4
NotApplicable EWS
Healthy 1/3/2014 10:18:17 PM
2
Online
FrontendTransport
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:47:09 AM
11
Online
HubTransport
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:47:09 AM
29
NotApplicable Monitoring
Unhealthy 1/5/2014 4:05:57 AM
9
NotApplicable DataProtection
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:25:42 AM
1
NotApplicable Network Healthy
1/4/2014 1:51:16 PM 1
NotApplicable OWA
Unhealthy 1/5/2014 8:05:08 PM
1
NotApplicable FIPS
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:12 AM
3
Online
Transport
Healthy 1/5/2014 4:11:00 AM
9
NotApplicable RPS
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:07:12 AM
2
NotApplicable Compliance
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:08:10 AM
2
NotApplicable Outlook
Healthy 11/21/2013 6:12:54 PM
2
Online
UM.CallRouter
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:47:10 AM
7
NotApplicable UserThrottling
Healthy 1/5/2014 4:16:42 AM
7
NotApplicable Search
Healthy
11/24/2013 6:55:06 AM 9
NotApplicable AntiSpam
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:16:43 AM
3
NotApplicable Security
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:28 AM
3
NotApplicable IMAP.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:14 AM
3
NotApplicable Datamining
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:18:34 AM
3
NotApplicable Provisioning
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:56 AM
3
NotApplicable POP.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:44 AM
3
NotApplicable Outlook.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:46 AM
3
NotApplicable ProcessIsolation
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:26 AM
9
NotApplicable Store
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:38 AM
6
NotApplicable TransportSync
Healthy 11/24/2013 6:53:09 AM
3
NotApplicable MailboxTransport
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:11 AM
6
NotApplicable EventAssistants
Healthy 11/21/2013 6:22:01 PM
2
NotApplicable MRS
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:29 AM
3
NotApplicable MessageTracing
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:18:15 AM
3
NotApplicable CentralAdmin
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:17:25 AM
3
NotApplicable UM.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:17:08 AM
3
NotApplicable Autodiscover.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:17:13 AM
3
NotApplicable OAB
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:51 AM
3
NotApplicable OWA.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:52 AM
3
NotApplicable Calendaring
Healthy 11/24/2013 6:56:59 AM
3
NotApplicable PushNotifications.Protocol
Healthy 11/21/2013 6:16:05 PM
3
NotApplicable EWS.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:07 AM
3
NotApplicable ActiveSync.Protocol
Healthy
1/3/2014 5:20:16 AM 3
NotApplicable RemoteMonitoring
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:47:09 AM
3
Any solution for this alert, how to rectify it, but OWA is running perfect for all users.Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
Do we have Exchange 2010 coexistence?
If it is the case, I know the following known issue:
Release Notes for Exchange 2013
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj150489%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx
Please note the "Exchange 2010 coexistence" session.
If it is not related to our problem, please check the IIS log.
If there is any detailed error code, like 401.1, 401.2, please let me know.
Hope it is helpful
Thanks
Mavis
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 Performance Monitor Data Collector Sets
I've noticed that the Exchange 2013 install created two data collector sets within Performance Monitor:
ExchangeDiagnosticsDailyPerformanceLog
ExchangeDiagnosticsPerformanceLog
These sets are creating daily log files saved in C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Logging\Diagnostics\DailyPerformanceLogs that are about 500MB in size, which are filling up our system volume.
I've tried stopping them, but they get restarted automatically. I also tried deleting them, but they get recreated automatically. Is there a way to disable these? We have a 3rd party tool that we use for performance monitoring and would like to avoid having
to delete these log files on a regular basis to keep our system volume from filling up.
As a workaround, I've changed the path where the log files get saved to a non existent drive letter, but would still like to disable the Data Collector Sets completely.
Thanks,
-CoryDo note,
These performance counters only take up 1 week and not more so it will be about 3-5 GB if you can`t spare this on you c disk you have not implemented any best practise exchange design.
specialy with todays JBOD SATA design your c disk will be 1TB +. Review your designs to match MS advise.
MCTS-MCITP exchange 2010 | MCTS-MCITP Exchange: 2007 | MCSA Messaging: 2003 | MCP windows 2000
Hello Martin,
Many of us are implementing exchange in a virtual environment, where disk is at a premium. Spending money on a 1 TB system drive is not a reasonable expectation. Even if that is best practice, there should be a way to manage the location and
size of these log files.
The inability to manage the location of log/performance data for centralization, or other reasons, is one more example of the disconnect between MS and their customer's use cases in regards to 2013.
These are the requirements for 2013 from MS:
At least 30 GB on the drive on which you install Exchange
An additional 500 MB of available disk space for each Unified Messaging (UM) language pack that you plan to install
200 MB of available disk space on the system drive
A hard disk that stores the message queue database on with at least 500 MB of free space.
So your statement is invalid as 30 GB is not even close to deal with the amount of log and performance data that we cannot modify in any way. -
Hi All,
My team works on a managed EWS API based solution but we've found a behavior of the managed EWS API that we can't explain based on dev documentation (maybe we've missed or misunderstood something).
The problem is that the following piece of code throws 'At least one recipient isn't valid.' error in the line "up.Update"
I don't have any recipients for the appointment so that's true that there is no valid recipient but on the other hand I set the invitation mode to SendToNone so the update changes shouldn't be sent to any recipient. That's is also interesting why the
behavior is different when SendToNone is used during creation and SendToNone during updating (the commented out lines). The update works fine in this case.
try
var ap = new Appointment(service);
ap.Start = new DateTime(2014, 1, 31, 10, 0, 0);
ap.End = new DateTime(2014, 1, 31, 11, 0, 0);
var r = new Recurrence.RelativeYearlyPattern();
r.DayOfTheWeek = DayOfTheWeek.Friday;
r.DayOfTheWeekIndex = DayOfTheWeekIndex.Last;
r.Month = Month.January;
ap.Recurrence = r;
ap.Recurrence.StartDate = new DateTime(2014, 1, 31, 23, 30, 0);
ap.Subject = "abc";
// ap.Save(WellKnownFolderName.Calendar, SendInvitationsMode.SendToNone);
ap.Save(WellKnownFolderName.Calendar, SendInvitationsMode.SendOnlyToAll);
var up = Appointment.Bind(service, new ItemId(ap.Id.UniqueId));
up.Recurrence = new Recurrence.DailyPattern(new DateTime(2014, 1, 29), 3);
up.RequiredAttendees.Add("[email protected]");
// up.Update(ConflictResolutionMode.AlwaysOverwrite, SendInvitationsOrCancellationsMode.SendOnlyToAll);
up.Update(ConflictResolutionMode.AlwaysOverwrite, SendInvitationsOrCancellationsMode.SendToNone);
catch (Exception e)
Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
The problem seems to only occur on Exchange 2013. We have also two test boxes with Exchange 2013 and the behavior also slightly differs between the boxes. On the first test box the problem occurs always but on the second one the problem only occurs in specific
appointment configurationd. I've never configured exchange 2013 myself so I don't know if there is any parameter during set up that may impact this behavior.
Does anybody see any problem with the above code?
Thanks in advance for helpWere you able to figure what was going on with your first problem? we're seeing the exact same issue with one of our customers.
-
Exchange 2013 OWA: Cannot set auto reply in shared mailbox
We use Exchange 2013 and Outlook 2010. We have 3 users tha connect to a shared mailbox. We would like to have an auto-reply on this mailbox but cannot set it with the OWA. We get the following error:
Client Information
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; Trident/7.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.3)
CPU Class: x86
Platform: Win32
System Language: nl-NL
User Language: nl-NL
CookieEnabled: true
Exception Details
Date: Fri Jul 11 11:31:40 UTC+0200 2014
Message: Kan de eigenschap _events van een niet-gedefinieerde verwijzing of een verwijzing naar een lege waarde niet ophalen
Url:
https://owa.'domainname'.nl/ecp/15.0.712.22/scripts/microsoftajax.js
Line: 5
Call Stack
Dump Event
errorMessage = Kan de eigenschap _events van een niet-gedefinieerde verwijzing of een verwijzing naar een lege waarde niet ophalen
errorUrl =
https://owa.'domainname'.nl/ecp/15.0.712.22/scripts/microsoftajax.js
errorLine = 5
errorCharacter = 57312
errorCode = 0
actionURL =
altKey = false
altLeft = false
behaviorCookie = 0
behaviorPart = 0
bookmarks = null
boundElements = [object HTMLCollection]
button = 0
buttonID = 0
cancelBubble = false
clientX = 1187
clientY = 72
contentOverflow = false
ctrlKey = false
ctrlLeft = false
data =
dataFld =
dataTransfer = null
fromElement = null
keyCode = 0
nextPage =
offsetX = 0
offsetY = 0
origin =
propertyName =
qualifier =
reason = 0
recordset = null
repeat = false
returnValue = true
screenX = 2373
screenY = 343
shiftKey = false
shiftLeft = false
source = null
srcElement = null
srcFilter = null
srcUrn =
toElement = null
type = error
url =
wheelDelta = 0
x = 0
y = 0
getAttribute =
function getAttribute() {
[native code]
removeAttribute =
function removeAttribute() {
[native code]
setAttribute =
function setAttribute() {
[native code]
Detailed Call StackHi,
Error information is quite important. In order to solve your issue effectively, please take your time to describe the error in English for my research.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support -
Winmail.dat attachments from Exchange 2013 on premi and Hosted Office 365 set up.
Hello TechNet,
I have an on going situation with winmail.dat attachments. I currently have a ticket open with Microsoft, but I want to see if anyone has personal experience with this. Here is the rundown.
We have migrated from an Exchange 2007 server to Exchange 2013 for the migration to Office 365. We also have a hosted Office 365 server with half of our mailboxes in the cloud and half of them on the Exchange 2013 on premise server.
The current settings for TNEFEnabled:
On Premise: False
Hosted: False
Whenever a internal email with a calendar invite(exchange calendar, go to meeting) goes out to any external domain the recipients receive winmail.dat.
When settings for TNEFEnabled On Premise and Hosted are set to true both calendar invites and PDF, Excel attachments etc the recipients receive winmail.dat.
When speaking with Microsoft about this issue. The representative was watching me through a LogMeIn session as I set both TNEFEnabled false on both on Premise and Hosted.
This is really frustrating as many employees depend on this to be fully functional, and to be honest am tired of dealing with this.
I need help.
-BenI am having the same issue.
Luckily I have only migrated my own mailbox to office365.
Tried both true and false TNEFEnabled on both onpremise and office365 via powershell and confirmed that both have been applied.
If I send the email as a plain text then the attachment works ok. If I send it as HTML then I get winmail.dat.
The above KB doesnt really help me, sending plain text emails is like going back to the dark ages!
I am sending from outlook to outlook (I send from my external email address, to my work email address and visa-versa)
If someone with an onpremise mailbox sends me an email, the attachment works ok.
If someone sends me an attachment via hotmail, the attachment works ok.
It seems to only effect emails I send to myself through outlook, i am sending it through a POP3 account to our onpremise exchange 2010 which forwards the email to office365
Maybe you are looking for
-
User has contribute access but he is not able to access the site collection...
User has contribute access but he is not able to access the site collection...
-
Hi Guys. We are in the process of using BTH add-on and Payment Engine add-on for Bank STatement Processing. While initialising the Set up in House Bank Accounts system is asking to import file name but i didnt find any file format there. Will u guys
-
Right clicking on a flash object causes all flash objects to crash
whenever I attempt to right click on a flash movie or other flash based object the flash plugin crashes and takes all flash objects including those in other tabs with it. There does not seem to be any other problems with the plugin just that it crash
-
How do i see the current version of compiler installed in the unix machine
how do i see the current version of compiler installed in the unix machine
-
Lost power, tnslistener 12514 error
All, We recently lost power and a server that shouldn't have been in production anymore is apparently something that needs to be online. I'm not a DBA by any stretch, so this is a bit over my head. It's running oracle 10g services on top of a Windows