AdvTable-MultiSelect-Grey rows on which operation has been performed.

I have advanced table, with multi select rows checkbox.
I need all the values of col1 of selected rows in advTableVo and insert it in a custom table attached with TestVO
once values of those rows are inserted in TestVO, select checkbox should grey out for those specific rows in advanced table.
This is what I did.
In advTableVO for adv table I added a transient String Attribute "SelectMultiRow".
Created multiSelections for my adv table.
Associated "SelectMultiRow" VO attribute, with multipleSelection1.
Under multipleSelection1, added a flowLayout, under it a submit button saying 'InsertSelectedRows'
Caught the action in PFR :
   if( pageContext.getParameter("InsertSelectedRows") != null);
      am.invokeMethod("InsertSelectedRowsInQuestion");
In AM :
//added col1 values of all selected rows to ArrayList
      listOfQuestionsToBeInserted.add(poRow.getAttribute("Question"));
for (int j=0; j<listOfQuestionsToBeInserted.size(); j++)
System.out.println(" looking inside ArrayList " + listOfQuestionsToBeInserted.get(j)); ///this prints fine.
// Check If the value already exists in Question column in customdb (TestVO)
// insert only unique values in TestVO
// once committed, How to grey out select checkbox for rows in advtableVO, which have been inserted?

Worked on your suggestion. I did get some of it working.
Im facing one thing, but it could be may not be an issue, please suggest .
There are 2 tables , table1, mastertable,
If value col1.mastertable exists in col1.table1 then disable checkbox -I did that based on your suggestion of spel.
now user selects few rows, and clicks insert button....
here in AM, I have this line of code :
if( (poRow.getAttribute("SelectMultiRow")).equals("Y") )
This throws NPE for rows which were already disabled at the time of rendering the page.
Is it ok to put it in try-catch block and just work with the values that display selected (Y ) ??
thanks

Similar Messages

  • Get the rows in the same order in which it has been inserted.

    Hi,
    I have a table with four columns(All varchars)...and there are no primary keys
    i have inserted 15 rows where col1="xyz"
    Now while retrieving the same...i dont get the same in the order i ahve inserted..
    What is the way to get the rows in the same order in which it has been inserted..?
    Regards

    I have a table with four columns(All varchars)...and
    there are no primary keys
    i have inserted 15 rows where col1="xyz"
    Now while retrieving the same...i dont get the same
    in the order i ahve inserted..
    What is the way to get the rows in the same order in
    which it has been inserted..?
    RegardsWhy? What is your business case behind this?
    In my experience an "order by" is used way too much without any real need to do it. Are your users interested to know in what order a few records from two years ago have been inserted? What about updates since that time?

  • Note: Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time

    Dear all,
    sorry for opening another thread on this.
    I think I have a performance issue with workflows attached to document sets in SharePoint. And I say “I think” because people keep telling me that this is the way it just is.
    The user creates a new document set, which triggers a workflow in which the user has to confirm/review/approve a series of tasks. The time it takes from clicking the OK button on those task form to the workflow status moving to the next step is about 4 seconds.
    And visiting that status page within those 4 seconds brings up the infamous “Note: Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time.” message.
    Hitting Refresh in the browser after those 4 seconds will make the new workflow status appear and the red text go away.
    Is that normal? Is that the performance that everyone else is seeing as well?
    I struggle to see why simply moving a workflow from one task to another should take that on a machine that isn’t doing anything else at the time.
    (1)   
    I have a standalone (non-clustered) SharePoint box, 4 CPUs, 8 GB of memory, more than half of that available, acting as application server and wfe; only the database is on different box.
    (2)   
    The CPU only goes up to 18 or 19%, so CPU does not seem to be the bottleneck. Half the RAM is also still free.
    (3)   
    The workflow is designed with Nintex, and has about 9 flexi and review tasks – the last 2 of them in a loop iterating over typically 3 or 4 items.
    (4)   
    Looking at the logs it looks like the processing in Nintex only takes about 1 second – I don’t know where the other 3 seconds are going.
    (5)   
    There is nothing obvious in the logs.
    (6)   
    We’ve looked at all the “theoretical” improvements around throttling and batch sizes etc. – none of them appeared make any difference. And the workflow is so small that it looks like my tasks gets executed straight away. The problem appears
    to be that the execution takes too long(?) and therefore has not finished by the time the page get redrawn.
    (7)   
    I am running perfmon and I can e.g. see one(!) workflow being loaded into memory – as expected as I am the only user.
    (8)   
    I am seeing a total of 3(?) SQL queries being executed(?). I get the Bytes Sent/sec spiking at 25K, and Bytes received at 18K. But is this good or bad or a bottleneck?
    Where do I take it from here?
    I have been told that “[…] most customers have no issue with this as they are used to the way SP operates and it can be slow at times.” Is it really that bad?
    If it is worth watching more performance counters then I’d need to know what to compare them to.
    Is there something else I am missing?
    Thanks
    Martin

    Hi,
    Before considering an additional hardware try to change following configurations for workflow:
    Increase Throttle Size
    Increase Batch Size
    Time Out
    Workflow Timer Interval
    AutoCleanUpDays
    Increase Throttle Size
    The Workflow throttle setting controls how many Workflows can be processing at any one time on the entire server farm. By increasing the throttle it will allow the number of Workflows execution or can be initiated at a time.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Throttle Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Throttle Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowPostponeThreshold 100
    Increase Batch Size
    This is the size that determines number of events processed for a single Workflow instance. Default value is 100, but it can be range from 1 to any number.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Batch Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowBatchSize
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Batch Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowBatchSize 200
    Time Out
    This decides the time out of the Workflow event. The default value is 5 and can be any integer. The time is in minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout -pv “15″
    Workflow Timer Interval
    This setting is applicable at Web Application level and not the farm level. The workflow timer interval specifies how often the workflow SPTimer job fires to process pending workflow tasks. This interval also represents the granularity of delay timers within
    your workflow. If a timer is set to delay for one minute, but the interval timer fires only every five minutes, the workflow delays for five minutes, not one minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn job-workflow -url <Web Application Url>
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn job-workflow -pv “Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30″ -url <Web Application Url>
    Here is the url for reference :
    http://praveenkasireddy.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/workflow-due-to-heavy-load-the-latest-workflow-operation-has-been-queued-it-will-attempt-to-resume-at-a-later-time/

  • Workflow. Latest workflow operation has been queued

    Good day,
    I have sequential workflow which Is started after item created in list. Sometimes, after start of workflow in status I can
    see note:
    Due to heavy load, the latest workflow
    operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time.
    After several page refreshes it disappears.
    Can I somehow make this note not to appear?

    Hi,
    Before considering an additional hardware try to change following configurations for workflow:
    Increase Throttle Size
    Increase Batch Size
    Time Out
    Workflow Timer Interval
    AutoCleanUpDays
    Increase Throttle Size
    The Workflow throttle setting controls how many Workflows can be processing at any one time on the entire server farm. By increasing the throttle it will allow the number of Workflows execution or can be initiated at a time.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Throttle Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Throttle Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowPostponeThreshold 100
    Increase Batch Size
    This is the size that determines number of events processed for a single Workflow instance. Default value is 100, but it can be range from 1 to any number.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Batch Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig | Select WorkflowBatchSize
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Batch Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowBatchSize 200
    Time Out
    This decides the time out of the Workflow event. The default value is 5 and can be any integer. The time is in minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout -pv “15″
    Workflow Timer Interval
    This setting is applicable at Web Application level and not the farm level. The workflow timer interval specifies how often the workflow SPTimer job fires to process pending workflow tasks. This interval also represents the granularity of delay timers within
    your workflow. If a timer is set to delay for one minute, but the interval timer fires only every five minutes, the workflow delays for five minutes, not one minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn job-workflow -url <Web Application Url>
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn job-workflow -pv “Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30″ -url <Web Application Url>
    Here is the url for reference :
    http://praveenkasireddy.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/workflow-due-to-heavy-load-the-latest-workflow-operation-has-been-queued-it-will-attempt-to-resume-at-a-later-time/

  • Firefox won't open - get error message "this operation has been cancalled due to restrictions in place on this account..."

    I can't open firefox - every time I try I get the above error message. This has started after no apparent changes or updates to my system, just a normal shut down. I have tried changing the registry .htm, .html etc. file names and reinstalling as suggested but this doesn't work. The only way I can open firefox is after I have reinstalled it and it automatically launches a browser.
    I can open firefox in a new user account which suggests something has changed in the account I usually use but I have no idea what since I have not made any changes myself and can't see anything that would suggest it is blocking firefox from opening. I've run a virus scan and it is coming up clean.
    Does anyone have any suggestions? I'd be very grateful for some help.
    Thank you.

    Hi mcclausky, you may need to manually remove a policy setting from the registry. You also should scan for malware that might have created this problem.
    This article lists scanning and cleaning tools other Firefox users have found helpful: [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]].
    To check your Windows registry for policy settings that might affect Firefox or other programs, I suggest consulting a Windows forum or Microsoft's forums. For example:
    * http://windowssecrets.com/forums/
    * [http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_8-system/this-operation-has-been-cancelled-due-to/9677848e-072d-4206-87f4-9da9284d6151 This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator. - Microsoft Community]
    * [http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-security/restrictions-this-operation-has-been-cancelled-due/8af1d0cd-8fbd-4223-9396-86d7497bb275 Restrictions. This operation has been cancelled due to to restrictions in effect on this computer.Please contact your system administrator. - Microsoft Community]

  • SQL2012: Internal Error: The operation terminated unsuccessfully. The connection timeout was exceeded. Server: The operation has been cancelled

    When rendering a SSRS native mode report based on a query to SSAS the report with fail with the following error:
    An error has occurred during report processing. (rsProcessingAborted)  Cannot read the next data row for the dataset. (rsErrorReadingNextDataRow).  The connection either timed out or was lost.  Unable to read data from the transport connection:
    An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
    Putting a trace on the SSAS instance, I get an error:
    Internal error: The operation terminated unsuccessfully.  The connection timeout was exceeded. Server: The operation has been cancelled.
    I've modified the IIS (6) application pool timeouts, the SSRS rsreportserver.config timeouts, and the SSAS timeouts.  Restarted services, rebooted, and still I get this error.
    The report will render if I select a shorter time period (less data, shorter query time).
    Running SQL2012 (11.0.5058.0), SSAS and SSRS on separate servers, same subnet.
    Any help or suggested troubleshooting greatly appreciated.

    Please check the links below.
    http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH186577
    https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2200755?wa=wsignin1.0
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-IN/library/ms155782.aspx
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dynamicsaxbi/archive/2013/02/14/how-to-addressing-ssrs-session-timeouts.aspx

  • How to identify which data has been inserted  to the table in specific date

    Hi,
    i created one table without data column.. i am inserting data in that table.
    i want which data has been inserted today..
    Please help.
    Thanks,

    If you are in Oracle 10g you can use ORA_ROWSCN.Note that unless the table was created with ROWDEPENDENCIES enabled, though, ORA_ROWSCN is tracked at the block level rather than the row level. So a block with one new row and many old rows could appear as having all been entered today.
    Justin

  • 'The operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer' prompts when firefox is started.

    When I tried to open Firefox, it displayed a pop-up saying that 'The operation has been canceled due to the restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact system administrator'. Even if I logged in as system administrator and tried to start Firefox, it showed me the same pop-up. The problem started from today morning. Yesterday, I was using Firefox and it worked for me. But for quite few days even though if I closed the window it was still running. Next time if I need to start Firefox, I need to close it from the Task manager and then need to start it. Not sure how to fix this problem. Now, I uninstall ed the older version (3.5.0 not sure) and updated with 3.6.3. Then also it shows me the same pop-up.
    == This happened ==
    Not sure how often
    == Yesterday (04-May-2010)

    By googling this site was found:
    [http://techsalsa.com/solution-to-this-operation-has-been-cancelled-due-to-restrictions-in-effect-on-this-computer/]
    You can try following solutions and see which one fix it for you.
    Solution 1:
    • Go to Control Panel -> Add Remove Programs, click on Set Program Access and Defaults.
    • Open up the configuration whichever is selected and change the default web browser to something else.
    Solution 2:
    If you use older versions of IE then upgrade it to the latest one.
    Solution 3:
    Open registry editor, find
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Classes\htmlfile\shell\open\command
    change its value to
    "C:\\Program Files\\Internet Explorer\\IEXPLORE.EXE" -nohome
    Solution 4:
    • Open registry editor and search (Ctrl + F) for the value nocontrolpanel.
    • Change its value from 1 to 0.
    Do mention the solution that worked for you.

  • "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer". Two forests and one transitive trust

    Hello. I manage one windows 2003 domain with a trust to a windows 2008 domain.
    The users with the 2008 domain accounts are supposed to (and they do) authenticate when using my workstations. The problem is that the 2008 has very restrictive policies such as no writing on "C:", no access no "CMD", windows explorer,
    etc. This also causes the error "This  operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer" when opening some programs on my workstations when using the 2008 domain accounts. I need to override the incoming policy,
    but since these are two completely different forests, I thing the "Block Policy inheritance" at my domain policy won't do much. 
    Any ideas on how to accomplish this?
    Thanks and regards
    Dave

    Thanks for the reply. Yes, but the amount of incoming policies is, for what I've been told, huge. Is there a general setting to allow the users to run software as if they were on my domain?
    Thanks and regards.
    Dave
    You can simply use rsop.msc or gpresult to identify applied policies. Once done, you can identify which settings to overwrite and configure the GPO for overwriting.
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions... - Office 2013 (Windows 2012R2 RDS)

    Hello,
    We've got an Windows Server 2012 R2 Remote Desktop Server farm for Multi tenant pursoses. therefor we've decided to use the following GPO setting: "Restrict Access to the Following Drives" in combination with the "Hide the following drives"
    for both settings we've set the C: drive to be inaccessible through regular browsing. This causes an issue when users, that open up their documents from an outlook attachement or an internet explorer webpage. Is there a way to get around the error message:
    "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer" or perhaps change the error.
    I've already been experimenting with the outlooksecuretemp registry and setting the temp/tmp environment variable to another location which then allows users to save in an temp folder but prevents the message, this then causes documents
    to get lost since such a location gets auto cleaned after logging off. Due to multitenant purposes i dont want to change 2 GPO settings mentioned earlier.
    I did how ever found the setting: "File open/save Dialog" (+ "Approved Locations") setting which prevents the error message but therefor causes other issues. Like beeing unable to press a library or explorer.
    Anyone got any suggestions on how to prevent the error message?
    Thanks!! And when more information is required please let me know so i'll try to explain the exact situation.
    Regards,
    Dennis

    I have the same issue as Dennis described. Environment is Server 2012R2 and Office 2013.
    "Restrict Access to the Following Drives" and "Hide the following drives" are set
    After the users have opened an attachement, a pdf for example, and then hit 'save as' the error message "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this Computer. Contact your Administrator" occurs. Finally it
    showed the save as dialag and pointed to redirected documents.
    I've also tried to set the 'OutlookSecureTempFolder' to the value U:\ in HCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Outlook\Security. Drive U:\ is mapped correctly.
    But when I have opened the attachment, the registry value has changed to C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\....
    BTW: In a Server 2008R2 environment with Office 2010 the modified 'OutlookSecureTempFolder' worked like charm.
    Any new ideas?
    Regards,
    Markus

  • [Win Server 2008 R2]This Operation Has Been Cancelled Due to Restrictions in Effect on This Computer

    Environment:
    Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 as DC
    2 Domain administrator accounts: the built-in Administrator and a manually created which belongs to the Administrator group
    Problem Description:
    When I logged into the server using the Administrator account, I can't open any administration/management Windows application such as:
    Command Prompt
    Computer Management
    Any application located in Administrative Tools
    A popup called "Restrictions" appears with the message "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator". I am the system administrator and I've
    no clue about this issue!
    Besides, there's no "Run..." option in the Start Menu and you
    can't access to any network path (i.e \\IP_Address) from Windows Explorer: you receive the error message "Accessing to the resource '\\IP_Address' has been disallowed".
    Prior To The Problem:
    I did the following actions:
    Managed some AD users, groups and OU by moving, editing or deleting.
    Managed some shared folders on D drive by deleting the folder or changing some Security rights.
    I HAVEN'T TOUCHED ANYTHING RELATED TO GPO!
    Prior to these actions, everything was fine and I never received these error messages.
    What I Did So Far:
    The only thing I did is that I reset the settings of Internet Explorer in the Advanced tab and restarted the server. Unfortunately, it didn't change anything. I didn't know what to do else and I can't seem to find a similar situation as mine. Surely, there
    are many posts related to this error message, but none of them implies the denial of access to every administrative Windows application with the Administrator account.
    Therefore, I'm really seeking the help of the community to tackle this weird and annoying issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    Even if you do changes in Internet explorer settings it does not give any login/access problems in a server.
    Since it is a DC local administrator account won't be available unless and otherwise you enable option "Logon locally" So use domain admin account for accessing DC resources like CMD prompt, AD tools.
    "Run" is hidden in Windows server 2008 , you have to search in
    start or Use Win Key+R.
    So, check above two steps and access UNC paths 
    Regards, Ravikumar P

  • The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request

    Using the latest version of mvmc which supports conversion to 2012 R2, we get an error as above during the conversion process (just before it gets to Analyse disks).
    FYI, the log snippets are:-
    08/22/2014 06:57:23 +01:00  [5]  VERBOSE: End of initializing (D:\mvmc\tempconverted\MVMC\0\disk-0.vhdx).
    08/22/2014 06:57:33 +01:00  [5]  VERBOSE: System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.ExportLease.GetFiles(IDownloadAdapter adapter, String host, DirectoryInfo dirInfo, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.VirtualMachine.DownloadFiles(IDownloadAdapter downloadAdapter, String toPath, TaskContext context)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToDrives(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, IPostProgress& provisionHyperVPhase, IVirtualMachine& sourceVM, TaskContext taskContext)
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [5]  EXCEPTION: System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.ExportLease.GetFiles(IDownloadAdapter adapter, String host, DirectoryInfo dirInfo, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.VirtualMachine.DownloadFiles(IDownloadAdapter downloadAdapter, String toPath, TaskContext context)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToDrives(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, IPostProgress& provisionHyperVPhase, IVirtualMachine& sourceVM, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToMachine(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.<>c__DisplayClass6.<ConvertToMachineAsync>b__5()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1.InnerInvoke()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute()
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [5]  Exception caught : System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Gui.Model.ConversionModel.ConvertGuestMachine()
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Gui.ViewModels.Machine.MachineCompletionViewModel.OnWorkerDoWork()
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [1]  Conversion error message is displayed.
    08/22/2014 06:57:34 +01:00  [1]  Value of 'ErrorMessage' = 'The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request'
    Any ideas what could be causing this and a fix?
    Regards
    Ian

    Same Issue converting SBS 2011 with Exchange Decommissioned. Was hoping the error would go away after decom of Exchange but no luck.
    Hoping Microsoft gets us an answer on this because the idea behind the tool is fantastic.
    Move was to 2012 R2 from VMware 5.
    Will have to use disk2vhd /fingerscrossed
    http://vniklas.djungeln.se/2014/10/13/mvmc-3-0-released-with-p2v-support/
    SBS may not be supported, but have received this err otherwise as well.
    Failure Log:
    11/20/2014 19:41:26 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Before You Begin' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:31 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Before You Begin' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:31 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Machine Type' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:33 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Machine Type' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:33 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Migration Destination' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:44 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Migration Destination' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:44 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Hyper-V Host' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'MachineName' = '192.168.168.5'
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'UseSessionCredentials' = 'True'
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Pressing Next on the 'Hyper-V Host' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Displaying busy cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Validating the credentials'.
    11/20/2014 19:41:54 -06:00  [4]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Displaying normal cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Hyper-V Host' page.
    11/20/2014 19:41:56 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Disk' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:11 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'DestinationMachineSharePath' = '\\192.168.168.5\SBS01'
    11/20/2014 19:42:11 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'IsFixedDisk' = 'True'
    11/20/2014 19:42:11 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Disk' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:11 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Source' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'MachineName' = '192.168.168.48'
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'UseSessionCredentials' = 'False'
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Pressing Next on the 'Source' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Displaying busy cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Validating the credentials'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:55 -06:00  [6]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Displaying normal cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Source' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Virtual Machines' page.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Displaying busy cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Getting list of virtual machines'.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [8]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Displaying normal cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:42:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:01 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'VirtualMachine.DNSName' = 'SBS01.domain.local'
    11/20/2014 19:43:01 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Virtual Machines' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:01 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Connection' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'MachineName' = 'SBS01.domain.local'
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'UseSessionCredentials' = 'False'
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Pressing Next on the 'Connection' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Displaying busy cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Validating the credentials'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [6]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [6]  VERBOSE:
    Hyper-V server (192.168.168.5) supports VHDX: True.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Displaying normal cursor.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Connection' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:32 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Workspace' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'WorkspacePath' = 'E:\Hyper-V\Virtual Hard Disks'
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Workspace' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Summary' page.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: 'Verifying if conversion can proceed based on inputs'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Visible'.
    11/20/2014 19:43:56 -06:00  [7]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:43:57 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 19:43:57 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'SummaryPageConversionWarnings' = 'Warning(s):
    1: The number of USB devices configured on the VMware guest machine is 1. The USB devices will be ignored on the converted machine.
    2: The video memory configured on the VMware guest machine is greater than 4 MB. The video memory will be limited to 4 MB on the converted machine.
    11/20/2014 19:43:57 -06:00  [1]  Progress message: ''.
    11/20/2014 19:43:57 -06:00  [1]  Progress bar visibility changed to 'Hidden'.
    11/20/2014 19:44:07 -06:00  [1]  Moving Forward from the 'Summary' page.
    11/20/2014 19:44:07 -06:00  [1]  Navigating to the 'Completion' page.
    11/20/2014 19:44:07 -06:00  [3]  Background worker thread started.
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Evaluating Machine conversion request:
     Machine Conversion Request Received:
      Source Host:                        https://192.168.168.48/sdk
      Guest Virtual Machine:              SBS01.domain.local   Use Windows user account = False
      Destination Host:                   192.168.168.5   Use Windows user account = True
      Destination VHD path:               \\192.168.168.5\SBS01   Use Windows User account = True
      Destination VHD Type:               FixedHardDisk
      Destination VHD Format:             Vhdx
      Final Source VM Power state:        On
      Final Destination VM Power state:   Off
      Copy OVF File:                      False
      Guest VM ID:                        3
      Leave Tools Installed:              False
      Requested Provisioning:             HyperV
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    VM SBS01 has Scsi device 0:0 - disk-0.vmdk
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Destination operating system information:
      Operating System Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
      Version:               6.3.9600
      Service Pack:          Service Pack 0,0
      CIMOS Type:            18
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Mvmc.Gui, Version=3.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Machine Conversion Request Received:
      Source Host:                        https://192.168.168.48/sdk
      Guest Virtual Machine:              SBS01.domain.local   Use Windows user account = False
      Destination Host:                   192.168.168.5   Use Windows user account = True
      Destination VHD path:               \\192.168.168.5\SBS01   Use Windows User account = True
      Destination VHD Type:               FixedHardDisk
      Destination VHD Format:             Vhdx
      Final Source VM Power state:        On
      Final Destination VM Power state:   Off
      Copy OVF File:                      False
      Guest VM ID:                        3
      Leave Tools Installed:              False
      Requested Provisioning:             HyperV
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Connecting to source host.
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Querying destination Hyper-V Host OS.
    11/20/2014 19:44:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Destination operating system information:
      Operating System Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
      Version:               6.3.9600
      Service Pack:          Service Pack 0,0
      CIMOS Type:            18
    11/20/2014 19:44:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Querying source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:44:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    VM SBS01 has Scsi device 0:0 - disk-0.vmdk
    11/20/2014 19:44:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Guest VMware information:
      VM Name:         SBS01
      Host:            SBS01.domain.local
      Tools Installed: True
      Guest OS:        Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 (64-bit)
      GuestId:         windows7Server64Guest
      Memory (bytes):  8589934592
      Processors:      4
      Network Cards:   1
      Disks:           1
    11/20/2014 19:44:19 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    This conversion will proceed on-line.
    11/20/2014 19:44:19 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Creating snapshot of the source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:48:58 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Preparing source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:48:58 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Preparing source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:48:58 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Finished creating snapshot of the source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:49:08 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Querying source virtual machine OS.
    11/20/2014 19:49:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Guest operating system information:
      Operating System Name: Microsoft Windows® Small Business Server 2011 Standard 
      Version:               6.1.7601
      Service Pack:          Service Pack 1,0
      CIMOS Type:            18
    11/20/2014 19:49:09 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Uninstall VMware Tools and shutdown Request Received:
      Guest Virtual Machine:        SBS01.DAKMONDMN.local   Use Windows user account = False
      System32 directory:          C:\Windows\system32
    11/20/2014 19:50:01 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Downloading VMware virtual disks from source virtual machine
    11/20/2014 19:50:01 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Downloading device (/3/VirtualLsiLogicSASController0:0) disk-0.vmdk
    11/20/2014 19:50:01 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Initializing (E:\Hyper-V\Virtual Hard Disks\MVMC\0\disk-0.vhdx) with a size of 644245094400 with preallocate true.
    11/20/2014 20:28:10 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    End of initializing (E:\Hyper-V\Virtual Hard Disks\MVMC\0\disk-0.vhdx).
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The connection was closed unexpectedly.
       at stsc
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.VirtualMachine.DownloadFiles(IDownloadAdapter downloadAdapter, String toPath, TaskContext context)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToDrives(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, IPostProgress& provisionHyperVPhase, IVirtualMachine& sourceVM, TaskContext taskContext)
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [3]  VERBOSE:
    Restoration of the source virtual machine has been successfully completed. The source VMware VM is powered on.
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [3]  EXCEPTION:
    System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The connection was closed unexpectedly.
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.ExportLease.GetFiles(IDownloadAdapter adapter, String host, DirectoryInfo dirInfo, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ForVMware.VirtualMachine.DownloadFiles(IDownloadAdapter downloadAdapter, String toPath, TaskContext context)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToDrives(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, IPostProgress& provisionHyperVPhase, IVirtualMachine& sourceVM, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.ConvertToMachine(IMachineConversionRequest machineConversionRequest, TaskContext taskContext)
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Engine.ServiceLayer.Internal.MachineConversionService.<>c__DisplayClass6.<ConvertToMachineAsync>b__5()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1.InnerInvoke()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute()
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [3]  Exception caught : System.Net.WebException: The request was aborted: The connection was closed unexpectedly.
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Gui.Model.ConversionModel.ConvertGuestMachine()
       at Microsoft.Accelerators.Mvmc.Gui.ViewModels.Machine.MachineCompletionViewModel.OnWorkerDoWork()
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [1]  Background task is complete.
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [1]  Conversion error message is displayed.
    11/20/2014 20:28:35 -06:00  [1]  Value of 'ErrorMessage' = 'The request was aborted: The connection was closed unexpectedly.'

  • Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will attempt to resume at a later time.

    I have SharePoint 2010 Enterprise running SP1. Configuration is one SharePoint server in the farm and a SQL 2008 R2 database for the backend. Our user environment is 80 users with very little load on the SharePoint server. I have the workflow timer
    set to 1 minute.
    I have a SPD workflow that starts manually on a form library. Whenever I publish a new version of the workflow, the next time I start the workflow it takes the full minute to finish. If I click on the workflow status before it finishes, I see the message
    "Due to heavy load, the latest workflow operation has been queued. It will
    attempt to resume at a later time.". After the minute completes the workflow finishes.
    Here's the weird thing, the next time I start the workflow, it runs in a couple of seconds - almost instantly. I've tried up to 15 times after the inital publishing and everything seems to work fine on initiation.
    Well, that would be fine for me, however, I intermintantly get this heavy load message during task processes that are running inside the workflow. It's probably less than 5% of the time. It's really frustrating though so I appreciate some help. I'm look
    online and haven't found anything that describes my situation.
    Thank you in advance!

    Hi,
    Before considering an additional hardware try to change following configurations for workflow:
    Increase Throttle Size
    Increase Batch Size
    Time Out
    Workflow Timer Interval
    AutoCleanUpDays
    Increase Throttle Size
    The Workflow throttle setting controls how many Workflows can be processing at any one time on the entire server farm. By increasing the throttle it will allow the number of Workflows execution or can be initiated at a time.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Throttle Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig |
    Select WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Throttle Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowPostponeThreshold
    100
    Increase Batch Size
    This is the size that determines number of events processed for a single Workflow instance. Default value is 100, but it can be range from 1 to any number.
    Use below PowerShell command to get the current Batch Size:
    Get-SPFarmConfig |
    Select WorkflowBatchSize
    Use below PowerShell command to set new Batch Size:
    Set-SPFarmConfig -WorkflowBatchSize
    200
    Time Out
    This decides the time out of the Workflow event. The default value is 5 and can be any integer. The time is in minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Time Out value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn workflow-eventdelivery-timeout -pv “15″
    Workflow Timer Interval
    This setting is applicable at Web Application level and not the farm level. The workflow timer interval specifies how often the workflow SPTimer job fires to process pending workflow tasks. This interval also represents the granularity of delay timers within
    your workflow. If a timer is set to delay for one minute, but the interval timer fires only every five minutes, the workflow delays for five minutes, not one minute.
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o getproperty -pn job-workflow -url <Web Application Url>
    Use below STSADM command to get the current Workflow Timer Interval value:
    stsadm -o setproperty -pn job-workflow -pv “Every 10 minutes between 0 and 30″ -url <Web Application Url>
    Here is the url for reference :
    http://praveenkasireddy.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/workflow-due-to-heavy-load-the-latest-workflow-operation-has-been-queued-it-will-attempt-to-resume-at-a-later-time/

  • After installing the safari update for windows outlook is not opening email links. I have set safari as my default browser but hyperlinks won't open a browser window - I get an error message - "This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effec

    After installing the safari update for windows, outlook is now not opening email hyperlinks.  I have set safari to be my default browser but outlook won't open it when I click a link.  I get the following message: "This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator."  Please help.

    Hi mcclausky, you may need to manually remove a policy setting from the registry. You also should scan for malware that might have created this problem.
    This article lists scanning and cleaning tools other Firefox users have found helpful: [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]].
    To check your Windows registry for policy settings that might affect Firefox or other programs, I suggest consulting a Windows forum or Microsoft's forums. For example:
    * http://windowssecrets.com/forums/
    * [http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_8-system/this-operation-has-been-cancelled-due-to/9677848e-072d-4206-87f4-9da9284d6151 This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator. - Microsoft Community]
    * [http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-security/restrictions-this-operation-has-been-cancelled-due/8af1d0cd-8fbd-4223-9396-86d7497bb275 Restrictions. This operation has been cancelled due to to restrictions in effect on this computer.Please contact your system administrator. - Microsoft Community]

  • This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your systems administrator

    Here is our environment:  Windows Server 2008 x86 SP2 Terminal Server running Citrix XenApp5.0 with Office 2007 installed.  We have a Group Policy to restrict users from access the server's C:\ drive.  When our users open or save a Microsoft
    Word, Excel, etc. document they are presented with the following error.  "This operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect on this computer.  Please contact your systems administrator."  When our users click on the OK button it
    allows them to open or save the document.    If I remove the restriction to C:\ from our Group Policy, then everything is working fine.  Please tell me how to fix this problem. Thanks.

    Hi Jeffery,
    Unfortunately, I could not work around this and MS said it was by design. I even tried some clever stuff with symbolic link s but to no avail. I simply ended up informing my users to ignore the message and continue. i don't want anyone to be able to browse
    the C: drive so I'm leaving the NoViewOnDrives registry key in place. However, there is one possible workaround but for me , it didn't suit:
    Change the temp  location of the folder Outlook uses for attachments
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/817878
    Also, I'd recommend forcing all attachments to open in read-only mode http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953621 
    Annoying but you can't have everything i guess :(

Maybe you are looking for

  • Two messengers at the same time. A possibility?

    Hey gang I have a question... I have my regular MSN, but I also have one for my business, and I would like them both to be online at the same time... The MSN Messenger I have feature a window for "personal contacts" and one named "Company account" so

  • -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found ?

    I just built gdc (--enable-multilib, using gcc 4.7.0). And then every time I try to build D programs, I always get this: gdc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found Is that happen because I use gcc 4.7.0, or --enable-multili

  • Illustrator CC tool pallets disappearing

    Anyone else having this problem? the essential took pallets will often just disappear. changing to another workspace brings up other pallets but then some of those don't work right. I've only had this problem once I installed Yosemite... Seems like a

  • Why do my apps keep quitting unexpectedly?

    The software update on my mac, along with safari (I started using a different browser) and many apps on my computer have all stopped working. Everytime I try to open them, they "quit unexpectedly". No matter what i try, I can't stop this from happeni

  • Trying to give the focus at my JComboBox

    Hey does somebody knows what i'm doing wrong, i have a JFrame with a JTextField and a JComboBox, i want to give the focus on startup to the JComboBox but the form gives it to my JTextField, here is my code to ask the focus for my JComboBox keuzeBox.a