AE only using 25 percent of my CPU

I would like to get faster renders.  I have noticed that after effects is only using 25 percent of my cpu.  Is there any way to crank that all the way up to 100 percent like Premier does automatically?

CARLOSA345 wrote:
First of all do you  work for Adobe?
I do not work for Adobe. I'm a user like you. People on forums helped me out a lot when I was first learning AE over a decade ago and I like giving back to the communities that helped me so much.
CARLOSA345 wrote:
All 3d applications which are doing more intense calculations than AE dont require fine tuning to work properly.
This is a very valid frustration. It certainly seems as if it should behave differently.
However, your statement also demonstrates the core of the reason for the RAM/CPU behavior you've described. 3d software is doing more intense calculations. That's why it maxes the processors out, but look at the RAM use. For many of the 3d renders I do, the RAM isn't even halfway used yet all the cores are cranking away on my computer (plus all the cores on all the other computers I've wrangled into the render farm). After Effects is doing a lot of things that 3d software doesn't do, and so it uses system resources differently. It needs more RAM (for some compositions) and thus you're waiting on RAM while the processors seem to sit idle.
I've seen some folks with very footage-heavy compositions where their RAM and processors are sitting pretty idle because the bottleneck is their hard drive. If you're pulling 45 1080P clips at once for a shot, it's gonna take a bit for a normal hard drive to serve that up (luckily for me at my full-time job, I don't use normal hard drives).
But this is the crux of the problem. AE is such a versatile toolbox. It does things like DOF, 3d lights, soft shadows, particles, etc. but it also does keying, rotoscoping, stabilization and many other tasks. Some may rely on system resources other than the processors. That's why Adobe has made AE as tweakable as it is - they serve such a wide variety of uses.
Although, speaking of tweaking, have you seen how much tweaking you can do on C4D? It has a LOT more things in it to tweak than AE does. It doesn't usually crash though, but then, neither does my AE (which is why I suggested we could help figure out your issues).
And speaking of things sitting there idle, I would love for C4D to implement some form of GPU rendering natively as an option. I have very powerful GPUs in my computers at work (because my boss didn't listen to my technical request) and so it just sits there while C4D pounds on the processors. We haven't had time to do research into all the various GPU rendering plugins for C4D in order to make a choice and it frustrates the heck out of me to have all that horsepower just sitting there, idle.
CARLOSA345 wrote:
Also you tell me that the team is working on the problem so what good would it do to start a thread on it you can find threads on this subject by the bunches and its never really resolved.
The reason I suggested starting a thread was that I hoped the folks here in the forum could help you get your systems running without crashing on you. While I may have over a decade of experience, if you put the experience of the other folks on the forum together we have many centuries of experience. The veterans on these forums don't have the crashing issues you seem to be describing. Thus, I thought we might be able to help resolve your problems and remove the frustration you're experiencing.
Other threads from other people are running different systems than you are. Different OS, different hardware, different third-party plugins... If the majority of AE users had the crashing problems you're describing, AE wouldn't be the powerhouse in the industry that it is. That is what sparked my hope that there may be something fixable for you. RAM filling up while the processors sit at 25% might not be fixable by troubleshooting, but crashing probably can be.
And yes, the AE team says they're working on making it better, but it takes a while to rewrite software that is as complicated as AE is. This is not the kind of change that comes in a month or two. So, in the meantime, I thought we could help you work within the parameters of your current toolset until it improves.
I'm sure you've already been through these resources, but if you don't want to get help from the folks on the forums, it wouldn't hurt to take another look:
Optimizing for performance: Adobe Premiere Pro and After Effects
Video2Brain - Optimizing CPUs
FAQ: What are optimum memory settings for best performance in After Effects?
A recorded event where the Premiere and AE team discussed how their programs use system resources: http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/event/index.cfm?event=set_registered&id=2490687&loc=en_us
Like I said, I'm just a user like you and I'm only on these forums to try to help everyone else learn enjoy using AE as much as I do. Hopefully some of this helps you too.

Similar Messages

  • Svchost.exe using %70ish percent of my CPU. Help!

    what can i do to fix this?
    here is my trace
    https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=51399FF8882D4215!600&authkey=!APgsnMcclg-v54Y&ithint=file%2cetl

    Hi Skywurd,
    When did the issue start to occur ?Will the issue persist ?
    Have you checked the services included in the svchost.exe from the task manager ?
    The only suspect process is the NvStreamNetworkService.exe,it is a process belonged to Nividia .We can try to update the Nividia driver or reinstall the driver to have a check .
    Best regards
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Compressor 3.5.3 Quickcluster still only uses 20%CPU. What gives?

    I'm using Final Cut Studio 7. Compressor 3.5.3. First i couldn't get clusters to work at all. So i uninstalled and reinstalled FCS7 and the Clusters seem to -set up- just fine. But when i submit a batch, Compressor STILL only uses about 20% of the CPU. What Gives? it would do that without a cluster anyway. It bugs me that Final Cut 7 only uses about 20% when rendering footage as well. I've thought about upgrading, but the reviews for fcpX and Compressor 4 have not been great.
    Advice:

    What codec are you using and how long it the video? Quickcluster is a waste of time if you going to ProRes. If the video duration is short Quickclusters won't kick in with all cores running.
    There nothing wrong with Compressor 4... Going to compressor 4 won't solve your problem.

  • Compressor only uses 30% of CPU : (

    I was not able to find any previous and recent discussions about this, but my version of Compressor 4.1 only uses, at most, 30% of CPU on my Mac Pro 2013.
    Any ideas as to why Compressor would use 30% only, whereas Handbrake maxes out at 100%?
    Graham

    Hi Graham, from your Compressor.app V4.1 "Active" pane image, these batch jobs are all queued as expected. What is not clear is if they are utilising SEGMENTING or if the TRANSCODING is taking advantage of that cool AMD FIREPRO D300 you have in that new MAC PRO!
    I believe you need to review and maybe deploy some or all of these actions in compressor.app V4.1:
    make sure JOB SEGMENTING is enabled for each of the batch JOBs in the BATCH WINDOW.
    note that most APPLE codecs support it, others may not.
    I've not used the new MACPRO 2013, it may be that if compressor.app is directing the batch jobs to the the FIREPRO D300 GPU, then SEGMENTING may not be supported at this stage - A GUESS.. anyone else know?
    if JOB SEGMENTING is greyed out or unselectable (tick), then select the VIDEO tab and enable "mutipass" and see if that automatically sets on JOB SEGMENTING.. maybe not.
    define a CLUSTER (single or multiple nodes) to get the transcoder to muster enough (sufficient) compressord subtasks to utilise your mac.
    Rather than duplicating this infomation for the nth time, , there's loads of info on these forums and I'd direct you to the Compressor.app V4.1 Users Guide on page 101+.".. (manuals.apple.com... d/l the .PDF)
    enable "ADDITIONAL INSTANCES" on this cluster to have more compressord subtasks running. this will provide concurrent (not parallel) transcoding of not only the job segments bit segments of other jobs too!
    Use distributed processing - Transcode batches using other computers.. only if you have too.
    just check any unneeded FRAME CONTROL setting in the Apple Default transcode settings (Inspector pane).. use the LEAST one until you are satisfied with your results.
    Monitoring Tools: Try these...
    Share Monitor.app ->> /Applications/Compressor.app/Contents/PlugIns/Compressor/CompressorKit.bundle/C ontents/EmbeddedApps/Share Monitor.app
    drop it in the dock for easy reference
    Network Encoder Monitor: +E in compressor.app
    Using the SHARE MONITOR.app or the "Active" pane, for each BATCH JOB, EXPAND the disclosure triangles to review if JOB SEGMENTING is processing rather than one serialised job.
    I'm curious (and quite eager) how you go with your the new macpro 2013 , compressor.app V4.1 with the AMD Firepro D300 and job segmenting.
    Please post you results for others (and myself) to see!
    Warwick
    Hong Kong

  • HELP!!! - can i somehow tell my program how much percent of the CPU to use?

    can i somehow tell my program how much percent of the CPU to use?

    Yes but that doesn't mean that it is only going to
    use, for example, 10% of the CPU. It just means it
    won't use as much, maybe, as some other process.The
    answer is no.In my previous reply I made the assumption the OS
    wanted one program not to "hog" the processor. The
    normal way to deals with this is to use priorities.
    But the answer is still yes. The answer, in terms of the question, is still no.
    The OS can, or nothing
    would prevent an OS from, also putting restrictions on
    a program and say it may never claim more than 1/10 of
    the availible CPU time.I know of know OS that has any tool that allows one to set an application to use a percentage of the CPU.
    I can't even imagine a business need for it except under some obtuse testing (and only testing) conditions.

  • Windows XP Mode (Virtual PC) only uses half a CPU core/thread.

    Not only does windows xp mode not support multiple cores, to me it looks like it only uses half a core/thread.
    I noticed this because I just setup windows xp mode (virtual pc) on my computer.  I updated it, joined it to our domain and then installed our legacy ERP software.  This ERP software was designed and programmed to run on windows 98 or 2000, I can't
    remember right now, but its hardware requirements are very low.  This software runs very slows in the virtual pc, with the processor being the problem.  
    Matching the processor spike on the virtual pc using both performance monitor and task manager I compared it to task manager running on the host (my windows 7 machine).  The spikes in cpu matched one of the threads on my i7 processor (I use threads
    because an i7 has 8 threads but only 4 cores).  To my surprise when the CPU reached near 100% on the virtual PC the same spike on the host was only about 50% of the cpu thread.
    The host has a i7 950, 3.07GHz processor.  So this means that the virtual pc can only use up to 1.5GHz.  I have not run into the problem reported in other posts on this forum where the CPU is always at 50% or 100% on the virtual PC because when
    their is no activity the CPU drops to 10% or less and stays there.
    I will now have to use vmplayer, problem is having enough xp licenses for all users.
    Was anyone else aware of this?

    You can't use a half a thread.  Windows VPC uses one core at 3.07GHz, there's no halving the speed of the CPU. 
    The only way WVPC would use a lower clock speed is if there is power management throttling the CPU speed down.  Do you have a power management setting throttling your CPU?  Are you sure the problem is the CPU and not disk or network related? 
    Task manager on the host is not a very accurate way to determine CPU usage of the VM.
    If you have the correct version of Windows 7 (Pro or higher) there are no issues with XP Mode licenses, you get one license included with Windows 7.  There's no restriction requiring you to use XP Mode with Windows VPC, it will work under 3rd party
    virtualization solutions.

  • Adobe Media Encoder only using single core of CPU (core parking has already been disabled and did not solve the problem)

    I only edit videos every few months and the last time I edited a video was around 6-9 months ago.  At that time, I noticed AME was only using a single core of the CPU and contacted Adobe who instructed me to disable core parking, which worked.  After disabling core parking AME used 100% of all 12 logical cores to process the video and all was good.  Then last week, I decided to edit another video and noticed AME was very slow and checked and it was again only using a single core to process the video, but core parking is still turned off.  By slow I mean that a 10 minute video with the lens distortion correction preset and one video transition effect is estimated to take nearly 3 hours to complete.  For comparison, the GoPro software processed the same clip with the same effects in 20 minutes.  Also, through troubleshooting with Adobe over the last few days, I have also tried downloading previous versions of the software but the prior versions have the same issue.
    The video I'm trying to edit was shot on a GoPro Hero 4 Black with 1080p Wide at 60 frames per second.  The default video format for GoPro is .mp4.   The output settings I'm using when I export from Premiere Pro to AME are H.264 with the YouTube 1080p HD.
    My system:
    ASUSSabertooth X79
    Intel core i7 4930k (6 physical cores, 12 logical cores)
    16GB DDR3 Quad channel RAM
    Samsung 830 SSD 128GB
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 (not CUDA compatible, I know)
    Please ask if you need any additional information to help solve this problem.

    This has been driving me CRAZY... so going over the message boards from 2 to 5 am this morning I found the best explanation I have seen.   The problem is that Adobe Creative Cloud is NOT "Processor Group Aware".  Windows parses any more than 36 cores into "Processor Groups" and while the Pro version of Windows 7 & 8 can handle 256 threads they have to spread them across multiple processor groups.
    Simple Version:  AREA | How many cores does 3ds Max support?
    Microsoft's Explanation:  Processor Groups (Windows)
    Clearly, this is an Adobe Problem... If any engineers are reading this PLEASE review the below and incorporate it into your next build of Creative Cloud!!!
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn653313%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
    Again, I bought a VERY expensive machine based on your white paper that recommended Dual Xeon Workstations.  Please, Please Give us the product you PROMISED!!!
    Michael

  • Media Encoder only using 15% CPU, and system slows to cement

    Not sure what's going on, but trying to export from Premiere CS6 to Media Encoder and very basic 640x360 H264 4 minute clips are taking 40 minutes, only using 15-30% CPU (on 2011 Macbook Pro 2.3 core i7), and the system slows to a cement crawl (had to stop it just to type this post). Nothing else is using any CPU and RAM is 25% free.
    I don't even know where to begin to troubleshoot. Tried restarting is all so far. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Brandon

    It seems there is a problem with the Mercury Playback Engine on my MBP. I turned it off and switched to software only mode, and now CPU is screaming at 750% on export and estimated time is about 8 times faster

  • Premiere Pro CC only using 30% CPU and none of the GPU

    Hi,
    I’m very new to video editing (actually I have no Idea what H264, or avi or mp4 or mov is, I just need the video to work) and I have never used Premiere Pro before. Now I'm trying the CC 7.0 trial.
    My goal is to achieve the fastest rendering times possible.
    Today I have upgraded my PC for maximal performance in video editing:
    Intel i7 4930K (12threads)
    Radeon 6950 (2GB)
    16GB RAM
    SSD
    I have a recorded video of me playing a PC game in .avi 2552*1348 resolution (2560*1440 monitor without some borders).
    I have set export to H.264 and settings to match source (resolution 2552*1348, 30 FPS, Progressive, Square pixels, NTSC, main, 5.0).
    But when rendering (no effects, just cutting) the program only uses 22-45% of the entire CPU and none of the GPU.
    The best result with this stress was cca 1:1 rendering:movie length. I'm using 16GB RAM, I tried 32GB and 64GB and the stress on CPU and GPU was the same and the rendering times changed only slightly.
    I have an SSD and the read write speeds during rendering are 1-9 MB/s so there is plenty of performance left.
    Frankly, this 1:1 performance offers Power Director 11 which I have been using so far. (When editing 1080p the ratio in PP is cca 1:2,5, the same as in Power Director.)
    So when the disks are idle, the GPU is idle, more RAM changes nothing and the CPU only works on 1/3 its capacity, what is the bottleneck?
    I want to use 100% of the CPU and 100% of the GPU and have the rendering:movie say 0,3:1 or so.
    What can I change to fully use the processing power of my computer?
    Thanks

    Start reading here: Tweakers Page

  • After closing Firefox to use IE8 or any other program, everything is very choppy and slow. I have to go into Taskbar, Processes, and close firefox.exe manually (which is using up all the memory/CPU). Then, and only then, does everything behave normally. W

    After closing Firefox to use IE8 or any other program (like InterVideo to watch a DVD), everything is very choppy and slow. I have to go into Taskbar, Processes, and close firefox.exe manually (which is using up all the memory/CPU and should have closed before). Then, and only then, does everything behave normally. What is going on and what am I doing wrong or missing??
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == about a couple months ago and happens every time I close Firefox.

    <u>'''Kill Application'''</u>
    In Task Manager, does firefox.exe show in the <u>'''Processes'''</u> tab?
    See: '''[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Kill_application Kill Application]'''
    '''<u>Causes and solutions for Firefox hanging at exit:</u>'''
    '''[[Firefox hangs]]'''
    '''[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_hangs#Hang_at_exit Firefox hangs at exit (Mozillazine article)]'''
    '''[[Firefox is already running but is not responding]]'''
    <u>'''Safe Mode'''</u>
    You may need to use '''[[Safe Mode]]''' (click on "Safe Mode" and read) to localize the problem. Firefox SafeMode is a diagnostic mode that disables extensions and some other features of Firefox. If you are using a theme, switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes before starting Safe Mode. When entering Safe Mode, do not check any items on the entry window, just click "Continue in Safe Mode". Test to see if the problem you are experiencing is corrected.
    See:
    '''[[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]]'''
    '''[[Troubleshooting plugins]]'''
    '''[[Basic Troubleshooting]]'''
    If the problem does not occur in Safe-mode then disable all of your extensions and then try to find which is causing it by enabling one at a time until the problem reappears. You have to close and restart Firefox after each change via File > Restart Firefox (on Mac: Firefox > Quit). You can use "Disable all add-ons" on the Safe mode start window.
    <u>'''''Other Issues''''': to correct security/stability issues</u>
    <u>'''Update Java'''</u>: your ver. 1.6.0.19; current ver. 1.6.0.20 (<u>important security update 04-15-2010</u>)
    ''(Windows users: Do the manual update; very easy.)''
    See: '''[http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using+the+Java+plugin+with+Firefox#Updates Updating Java]'''
    Do the update with Firefox closed.

  • IMovie only using 50% CPU power

    Hi,
    When I export my project in iMovie my CPU usage holds at 50%. I accept this does mean I can do other things but would like the export to go faster.
    Is this usual for iMovie to only use 50% CPU (and only about 1gb of RAM (of 8gb)) or do I need to do something?
    New to Macs so any help appreciated.
    dcbevan

    Hi
    As I get it - Doesn't iMovie take full use of multiple core processors. Not even Pro
    applications does this to 100%
    BUT
    RAM - iMovie or FinalCut are not that RAM hungry - 1 to 2 GB would be OK
    Free Space on Start-up hard disk - VERY IMPORTANT
    • 25Gb my minimum for iDVD
    • 10Gb my minimum for iMovie
    • 5Gb and iMovie runs slow and instable
    • <1Gb and iMovie might not run OK at all
    Other applications running in paralell - results in bad performances
    • Energy Saver
    • Do not spinn down hard disks
    • Use of USB/USB2 external hard disks = Slow and bad performances especially when getting full
    FireWire or internal e-Sata performs best.
    • Screen savers - may be (by directing it to an empty folder - I got the feeling of slight increase
    in performances)
    My list on howto speed up iDVD Slightly - might also applie on iMovie.
    *Speed up iDVD*
    To speed up iDVD
    TO GET IT TO WORK SLIGHTLY FASTER
    • Minimum of 25Gb free space on Start-Up hard disk - if less than 5Gb slow and unstable - less than 1Gb might even not start.
    • Choise of encoding method will give very different productions speeds. On my d-G5 2GHz
    *Professional Quality (movies + menus up to 120 min.)* - BEST
    Takes about 2 x times the other ones - but if quality is of essence
    (Quality might be as good as or even better for movies under 60 minutes - by using Best Performances BUT not for movies up to 120 minutes)
    2 hour movie + menu = about 4 hours to encode at it’s best on my system
    *Best Performances (movies + menus less than 60 min.)* - High quality on final DVD
    1 hour including menu = about 1 hour to encode
    *High Quality* (in iDVD08 or 09) / Best Quality (in iDVD6) *(movies + menus up to 120 min.)* - slightly lower quality than above
    2 hours including menu = about 2 hour to encode
    • Use an as simple DVD-menu possibly without any animation at all. This reduces processing speed dramatically. I use ”Old Theme - and Brushed Metal” and animation turned off.
    • An as fast Mac and as many cores/CPUs possibly. My PowerMac G5 has two CPUs and iDVD uses about 120% = use more than only one CPU/Core. How many it can address I don’t know (anyone ? )
    • If possibly - Use two internally e-Sata drives - Drive access takes a great deal of time
    else FW-800 or FW-400 or USB2 or network storage (slowest and near to useless)
    to work on one (internal, boot, Mac OS, Start-up hard disk - will be BAD - and slow
    Normally my d-G5 2GHz takes about 2 x movie material when iDVD and Mac OS on one internal HD and material is on the other internal one.
    Now with material on an external USB2-drive and an external Lacie FW-400 as Start-up drive material of about 1.5h will need about 4-6 hours to get encoded and burned to DVD.
    Choise and use of hard disks is essential.
    • I guess that a Solid State Disks might improve speed
    • No other programs running in BackGround eg EnergySaver, Internet, AirPort, Bluetooth etc.
    • Don’t let HD spinn down or be turned off (in EnergySave)
    • Move hard disks that are not to be used to Trash - To be disconnected/turned off
    • Goto Spotlight and set the rest of them under Integrity (not to be scanned)
    • Set screensaver to a folder without any photo - then make an active corner (up right for me) and set
    pointer to this - turns on screen saver - to show that it has nothing to show
    • If Mac with only place for one internal hard disk. Then I would try to use an external FW (Mac OS Extended) one as Start-Up hard disk and store material on the internal one.
    eg iMac or ProBook or alike.
    from Karsten -
    • I assume that resolution and codec of source is another factor ... scaling (e.g. 1280x720 to 720x576 = that is an 'un-even' calculation). or, a difference in speed reg. to h264, dv-stream or aic as input ....
    Yours Bengt W

  • Power Saver Problems M30-344 (CPU only uses 600MHz)

    Hi!
    In my m30-344 are changed mainboard and display.
    At this time i can't use the full 1.5ghz of the cpu!
    In the Power Saver Profile i can choose only the cpu-rate 1-3! I have now de-installed this tool and reinstalled the version by the net. But i can only use 600mhz!
    What can i do?
    [Edited by: admin on 07-May-05 08:18]

    Hi
    Just need a little more help on this! I rang up pc world today and they had no idea what i was on about with the micro code. The guy kept saying its because i have no prossessor intensive apps running so it would run at 600mhz, he also said that cpuz is probably reporting the wrong cpu speed.
    I know this cannot be the case as in the bios it is set to high which will mean it will run at 1600mhz all the time and not drop to 600mhz. I also ran a game in the background, while raring a 600mb file with 6 ie windows open to no avail just to proove to him that it wasnt goin to 1600! :-)
    But he still didnt understand! So i need some light shed on what this micro code buisiness is all about because i have to explain to them exactly what the problem is. I need some info on this by tuesday so i can send it off with the laptop! Any help kindly recieved!
    Regards
    maki43

  • Why only using one CPU

    Just noticed when importing CD into iTunes on my MacBook is only uses one cpu, with activity monitor it show 98-100% CPU and never goes over 100%
    My fans also run when importing, I use lossless.
    Why not use more CPU speed?
    R

    I believe only applications writen to do so will take advantage of dual processors. I guess iTunes has not yet been updated for dual processor use.
    Patrick

  • Multisim 11 only uses one CPU core during simulation

    Hi,
    Just recently I've been using MultiSim again, v11 if that matters, and simulating goes slow, to my opinion that is.
    Now there are two things that I've noticed:
    - Multisim only uses one of two CPU cores during simulation, not both;
    - I've enabled CPU throttle (AMD's Cool'n'Quiet) but corespeed remains very low even though Multisim needs CPU power while simulating.
    The simulating of a NE555-based LED-flash circuit requires about 28 seconds to get to 100ms in the simulation. Now if I can get the CPU to throttle up, by for example having Prime95 stress one of the two cores, then the simulation only requires 12 seconds to get to 100ms.
    So here are my two questions:
    1. Is Multisim 11 capable of using more than one CPU core while simulating? If yes, how can I get it to use more than one?
    2. Probably not the right forum to ask, but is there a way to force Windows 7 Ultimate x64 to throttle up the CPU when Multisim starts simulating? Since Multisim does not seem to stress the only core it uses enough to throttle it up. Using Prime95 on one core does trigger a throttle up.
    With regards,
    Bart Grefte
    Relevant specs:
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    Multisim v11
    AMD A4-3400
    16GB RAM

    Completely forgot this topic....
    Is there a good reason why there is no multicore support? Multisim can certainly use it for simulating.
    As for the CPU throttling, I found a batch that can increase/decrease the "minimum processor state"-setting and it works immediately, no reboot required.
    @echo off
    powercfg.exe -getactivescheme > "%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
    set /p v_currentscheme= <"%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
    set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~24,36%
    del "%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
    powercfg -setacvalueindex %v_currentscheme% 54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00 893dee8e-2bef-41e0-89c6-b55d0929964c %1
    powercfg -setdcvalueindex %v_currentscheme% 54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00 893dee8e-2bef-41e0-89c6-b55d0929964c %1
    powercfg -s %v_currentscheme%
    exit
    Usage is simple:
    Start -> run -> c:\pathtobatch.bat 100
    for "minimum processor state"-setting at 100%
    Start -> run -> c:\pathtobatch.bat 5
    for "minimum processor state"-setting at 5%
    Please note that "set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~24,36%" is not the same for every language. The original batch had "set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~19,36%" (most likely for the English version of Windows 7), but since my Windows install is in Dutch, I had to change it in order for it to work.
    Running the batch with @echo off removed will show why.

  • CPU Multi core processor only using 1 core

    I have a 12 core CPU which works fine when rendering in Premier Pro utilizing all 12 cores but when I render in Media Encoder it only uses 1 core. This is a recent event that has occurred recently, has anybody got an idea what is happening? 

    hanugro,
    I did some searching, and the processor you want, is not available in many places.
    Even TigerDirect.com doesn't even list this processor. And, it must be VERY EXPENSIVE ! ( I'm guessing it will be $1,500 ? ), the one you list has a 1333 MHz bus speed !!
    This is the most expensive processor they have listed:
    http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3241539
    It is currently $579 ( as of today, Feb.14, 2008 )
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 Processor BX80562Q6700 - 2.66GHz, 8MB Cache, 1066MHz FSB, Kentsfield, Quad-Core, Retail, Socket 775, Processor with Fan

Maybe you are looking for

  • What happens when I lose my email address?

    I have bought apps for my iPad using my works email and Apple ID. Having retired  recently, my works email will soon be deactivated.  Does that mean I will be unable to update my apps?  I have tried to add my personal email to this account but unfort

  • Working with 2  submit buttons in a html form

    I have 2 submit buttons in a form. I will upload a file and save in a filepath in server when I click on one "upload" button. I want to use this file path in the code when I click on another button called"Process".  When I click the process nothing i

  • After BI install SIA and Tomcat could not start with service account.

    Hi BO Gurus, I want to install BO child node (Expand the parent install) Client IT prepared a system with MS Server 2012 with Windows 8 as OS, and assigned a Service Account for me. I gave service account following permissions - Act as a part of oper

  • ScriptPropertyBagProbe

    Hi, I am following the example provided in HDI-TechNet-SystemCenter-winvideo-PowerShellRuleMonitor.wmv to build a custom monitor in 2007R2 Auth Console.  The difference is I am using a VB and not PS script. The first deviation is I don't see a Trigge

  • HOW TO SHOW A PICTURE IN A FORM WITH PORTAL

    I want to show in page's form a picture where the path is in the database how can i show the picture ?