AFD and Trading Partner

Hi everybody.
Question.
I am using the AFD to record changes to investment data. On First Consolidation the trading partner field is available for input and the validation check is fine.
On an activity (any activity other than first consolidations) the trading partner field is not available which results in the validation check from failing. I need the trading partner to be filled to match the totals records. Is there a way I can get AFD to inherit or accept a trading partner??
Cheers

Hi Robert,
Investments deal with an investee unit, not with a trading partner. And all other forms have investee unit field. You need to change the validation.

Similar Messages

  • Validation for Profit Center and Trading Partner

    Hi Gurus,
    Please help me in creating validation for Profit Center and Trading Partner.
    I want system to give an error if we use Trading Partner related to particular profit centers.
    Please revert asap.
    Thank You

    Hello,
    Please use T.code OB28 and select the call up point 2.
    Than go to Prerequisite in expert mode and say
    Prerequisite  :           BSEG-VBUND <> ' '
      Check:               BSEG-PRCTR = ' '
      Error Message.: xyz
    I have created Validation understanding if someone gives Trading Partner and also Profit center while posting a doc than it will generate an error message.
    however if you have some diff req please change it accordingly/ take Abapers helps if not very clear.
    I hope this helps
    Regards
    Shireesh

  • Trading partner and Trading partner business area tables

    Hi Sap Experts,
    Trading partner and Trading partner business area if both are master data in which table both will be stored.
    Please give me advise.
    Regards,
    Prabhakar
    double post

    Hi,
    Please refer to the below links :
    For Trading Partner:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/d7/0753e743b911d189ee0000e81ddfac/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/01/a9b4e3455711d182b40000e829fbfe/content.htm
    For External Manufacturer:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/en/7f/a7e7464d6011d2b438006094b9c9be/content.htm
    Regards,
    Kiron Kumar T.

  • FAGLFLEXT table not updating Transaction type  and Trading Partner

    Hi,
    The document which i post is development system is posted to FAGLFLEXT table properly along with the transaction type and trading Partner; however in the quality and production the document is getting posted in the table FAGLFLEXT but the transaction type and Trading partner fields are not getting updated for these documents it is coming as blank.
    Please give us answer ASAP.
    Thanks,
    Anil.B

    Hi,
    I got it. Just ask BASIS to Open the QAS system client and delete all scenarios which was assigned in DEV and transported in to QAS system and reassigned itand saved in QAS system and then its worked. all fields are getting populated.
    Go to IMG Fin Acc (New) -> Fin Acc Global Setting (New) -> Ledgers -> Ledger -> Assign Scenario
    Thanks,
    Anil.B
    Edited by: SAP FICO on Nov 12, 2009 5:09 PM

  • AS2 and Trading Partner Identification for MDN

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where I have multiple Trading Partners that all use the same hub provider. I have setup the trading partners individually in B2B so the trading partner can be identified regardless of the transport server endpoint.
    For inbound documents I use the 'Identifying XPATH Expression" and "Identification Value" to override the default Document Definition so I can see which Trading Partner the Invoice is from, regardless of the hub provider that sent it. This is working fine.
    However, when sending outbound documents such as a Purchase Order the ourbound document is shown correctly :-
    HealthCorporateNetworkWA BBraunAustraliaPtyLtd AS2 - 1.1 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Doc - 2.5 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Action Complete 30 March 2009 10:07:54
    Whereas when the MDN is returned it is identified as another trading partner :-
    BaxterHealthcarePtyLtd HealthCorporateNetworkWA AS2 - 1.1 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Doc - 2.5 Acknowledgement Complete 30 March 2009 10:07:59
    These are 2 seperate agreements that are deployed and I assume that the b2b instance is simply identifying the appropriate Trading Partner Agreement by the AS2 Identifier only ?
    Is there anyway to modify this behaviour ? Obviously I want it to indicate that the MDN is coming from the Trading Partner I sent the PO to ? If I got the hub provider to apply a AS2 Custom Header would I be able to use this instead by adding a new Trading Partner Identification Type and then using that as the identifier in the TP Agreement ?
    Given the MDN is a synchronous response, why isnt it associated with the same TP Agreement ?
    Any ideas ?

    You are using custom over AS2 business protocol where in the identification of trading partner can only be based
    on the Exchange which is by AS2 identifier. The identification of Agreement is happening in the document layer which is nothing to do with whether the Acknowledgement is Sync/Async.
    Ideally you should create the agreement between host and hub provider

  • Inter business area transactions and trading partner business area

    Hi Gurus,
    We are on R3 4.7. *We have more than one business area but only one company code*.. We do pull financial statements by business area.
    One of the business area A gets a service contract to do work. Some part of the work is outsourced from business area A to business Area B. Business Area A pays to business Area B for the services done by business area B.
    While doing payment to the business area B, do we need to populate trading partner busiess area as business area A? Is this trading partner busiess  area mandatory to be populated in this type of scenario.
    Are there any things we need to be aware of when they are inter business area transactions as described in the above scenario.
    We are not implementing EC-CS/any other consolidation solution.
    Thanks,
    Edited by: James09 on Jul 11, 2011 7:41 PM

    If no consolidation system is implemeneted, then the partner business area is not mandatory. However it may be helpful for analysis as well as any future consolidations that may be necessary. Therefore it is suggested that this be captured, and in many cases will automatically be populated.

  • DOCUMENT SPILTTING ON BASIS OF TRADING PARTNER(VBUND) FIELD

    Dear Friends
    We are on ECC 5.0, we have activated document splitting on BUSINESS AREA basis..
    As for new requirement for consolidated financial reports, we have also added TRADING PARTNER(vbund) field for document splitting ..
    We have define companies(trading partner), assign them to relevant customer and vendor master.
    Also have tick INTER COMPANY POSTING AND TRADING PARTNER field in document types(OBA7)
    in documents, with vendor and customer relevant line items trading partner is coming automatically..
    for G/L related line items we want that trading partner should come automatically through document splitting ..
    please note that we cant assign trading partner with G/Ls in chart of accounts as same G/Ls can be used with different different trading partner at the same time..
    Kindly help me in this issue..
    Regards
    Expertia..

    Document Splitting is too complex a concept for Substitution.  If you have to just copy the Business partner to the missing lines, then you can use substitution.  But if you have more than one BP in any entry and the transaction has to generate entries accordingly to balance it, substitution cannot do that.
    If you are trying to split on any field other than Business Area, Profit Center and Segment, it involves a lot of work in terms of configuration and development.  You have to develop your custom routine to enable splitting on your selected field (VBUND) in your case.
    If I remember right, there is a consulting note which explains a brief summary of what is to be done for having Document splitting on custom fields.  You can try searching Service Market place.
    Ravi.

  • Special Ledger Summary Table trading partner filed update

    Hi,
    We are in SAP 4.7 version. We do have SPL past 15 years. Recently I got request to add few fields to the existing SPL table group, ex: Functional areas and Trading Partner fields.
    I added these fields and I am testing now. Trading partner filed is updating in all tables for GL account document. For inter company vendor and customer invoices document trading partner field is updating only in Actual table for both lines, but not in totals table. It is updating only GL account line in Inter company Vendor invoice, but not in Inter company vendor line item trading Partner, which is populated from inter company vendor master. it is updating in GL document, CO document and SPL actual tables. I am trying to resolve this issue; Please let me know your idea.
    Thanks,
    Anil.B

    We are going forward with getting the natural account detail data using the profit center extractor 0EC_PCA_3, and getting the ferc summary data using the general ledger extractor 0FI_GL_1.  With our testing so far, this combination will provide us the data we need in BCS.

  • Trading partner related issue

    Hello All,
    we are in ecc 6.0 .Using Document splitting.
    For Intercompany transactions trading partner field is populated.We want to see the trading partner field on the zero balancing line items also i.e in General Ledger View where we have this zero balancing account.How does we populate it on that line item as well.Does standard SAP does that or any User exits or substitutions available for general ledger view in Document splitting????
    Any inputs are welcome.Thanks.
    Regards,
    Sai.

    Hi Sai & all guys,
    I have a exactly similar problem with 4.7 version with intercompany document posted in SD and trading partner is not getting updated in PCA line item.
    All, Let me know if this is clear.... or need further info...
    Please I need your help..
    Regards,
    Vinay

  • Trading Partner - Required Field

    Hi Gurus,
    How can i make trading partner as a required field while posting any JV?
    And also, i want to put a validation for profit center and Trading Partner.
    Please revert asap.
    THank YOu

    We have all this configuration set up.  We do automatically get the trading partner populated on the balance sheet side of the entry.  We charge our subsidiaries inter company fees such as interest, management fees, commissions, etc.  We want to have the trading partner populated on these P&L account items as well because we then segregate these types of expenses by company in order to eliminate them in consolidation.  Many of these types of entries are done in GL entry using transaction code FB01 or F-65 to park.  When using these t-codes the trading partner does not get automatically populated in the P&L account item.  We want to make sure they add a trading partner when using these P&L accounts for inter company type expenses.

  • Trading partner receiving two same transactions

    Hi B2B Gurus,
    Our scenario is Division people place the flat files to FTP folder, SOA picks the flat files from FTP and it transforms to EDI XML file and then it place the EDI XML to IP_OUT_QUEUE, B2B picks up the file and it transforms to native EDI and sends it to trading partner.
    But here issue is we are sending a single transaction to trading partner and they are receiving the same payload with different filename
    Ex: The file named - Penske_860_20110629_172354282965_20110629_132412042.dat (Interchange # 282965)
    Contains the same data as - emerson860_pp_out.110629132506.17334
    The file named - Penske_860_20110629_183428283017_20110629_143441592.dat (Interchange # 283017)
    Contains the same data as - emerson860_pp_out.110629143618.29885
    Could any one help us how to cross chek this and wat are the chances for this ...
    Regards
    Sam

    Hi Anuj,
    Is it that same TP is receiving one transaction twice or same transaction is being passed to two TP's
    ans:same TP is receiving one transaction twice with different filename with same payload.
    We are using 10G B2B.
    We are sending one transaction to tradaing partner and trading partner receving the same transactions twice with different file name and same payload.
    Anuj, I cross check the filename in the log file, i am able to find only one file name in it. (Penske_850)
    Is it possible that we sent one file and they are duplicating on theire side?
    Regardds
    sam

  • Trading partner is in Approved state.

    Hi All
    We have 18 Agreements ,14 document types , 2 remote trading partners.
    Recently our trading partners have changed there host name so we had to modify host name and trading partner's certificate .
    After modifying these detaiils , trading partners are in Approved state.
    How to deploy these new changes so that it comes back in deployed state?
    Should be export and import full configuration from Adminstration tab ? OR should be retire or quiese already deployed agreements first ?
    Please advice.

    It seems you are working with 10g however Nitesh is guiding you for 11g. Just take the export of already deployed agreements (for back-up), retire the existing configurations, now all agreements should come into draft state. Make whatever changes you want, and after that save, validate and deploy the all agreements again. One configuration may have many agreements, so you may deploy all agreements as part of one configuration or you may create separate configuration for each agreement. It's your choice.
    Regards,
    Anuj

  • Checking / posting a GL balance - with a trading partner?

    Hi All,
    Am quite at a loss, after worrying at this problem for a month. If anyone can give me a clue, I'd be most appreciative!
    I'm writing code that builds several BAPI objects, then uses BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_CHECK to make sure it can post. (I'm going to use it's twin, BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST, with exactly the same objects, if it passes the check.)
    For posting to a number of GL accounts for a given period, that is fine. But I understand I'm supposed to use "GL Account" AND "Trading partner" as a unique key, rather than just "GL Account". And that's where I'm stuck.
    To put it another way, right now I can do something like this:
    GL Account: 100101             Posting Value: -1000
    GL Account: 100102             Posting Value:  -5000
    GL Account: 100103             Posting Value:  6000
    This will post successfully, because the total balance is zero.
    But what i want to be able to do is something like this:
    GL Account: 100101             Trading Partner: ABC123     Posting Value: -1000
    GL Account: 100101             Trading Partner: DEF456      Posting Value:  -5000
    GL Account: 100103                                                          Posting Value:  6000
    So, if anyone can, please! A point in the right direction would be most helpful!
    Thank you,
    Richard

    Hello Kalyan,
    I was testing your solution and I have a problem with the validation. I think the problem is the set.
    Is BSEG and HKONT the table and field that I should use on the set? if not what table and field should I use to create the set?
    The problem that I have is that the validation rejects all the accounts (even the correct ones).
    Below my configuration:
    Set
    Table BSEG
    Field name  HKONT
    001     65401     65405     Valid GL accounts
    _Validation_
    Prerequisite
      BSEG-LIFNR = '2943' AND BSEG-ANFBU = 'US10'
    Check:
    BSEG-HKONT IN SET01
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Monica

  • Trading partner in GL, Vendor and Customer master

    Hi
    This is with reference to the clarification on field Trading partner in GL, vendor and customer master
    We have 10 company codes and are using same COA in all co codes
    We have activated Enterprise Consolidation in system and interunit profit elimination exist in our case.
    Please clarify the following:-
    1) Is there any impact on consolidation module if we did not maintain trading partner in GL master, vendor master & customer master
    Thanks & Regards
    D D Asnora

    HI
    It will effect in Interunit eliminations. and all the transaction which occured betweeen inter-units will be effected.
    regards
    Hari p

  • Trading Partner in Gain and Loss from valuation

    Dear Friends,
    My issue is with the valuation posted for account maintained on line item basis only (Not open item managment).  Since the account is maintained on line item basis, only balance is valuated each month thru f.05.
    The problem is that when account posted with Loss or Gain each month on valuation, the document will not have a Trading partner assigned which causes my inter-company elimination issue.
    How to get Trading partner assigned to document posted on valuation (F.05) I have tried sustitution rule and OB32 to make Trading Partner as editable but SAP does not allow both.
    Best Regards
    VK

    Thanks Venkata,
    My problem is with the autmated posting result from forex gain or loss when carrying F.05. These documents autmatically created but donot update the Trading Partner. I can not manually input them even if enter Trading Partner is option in OBA7 is checked.
    Best Regards
    VK

Maybe you are looking for

  • Viewing G5 on iMac Screen (not target mode)

    I just bought an iMac, 27". I also have a G5 desktop with Cinema display that runs os9 (which I want...I have several OS9 niche apps that don't exist for OSX). I'd like to lose the cinema display and view the G5 video on the iMac - NOT just see the d

  • Won't load interactive pdf

    I've tried deleting the app, and downloading again, and it works, sorta, for the first few tries, but then it gets stuck in the loading screen when I try to open another interactive pdf.

  • Can some1 tell me how 2 stop auto flash fr.adobe plz

    any help from any of u will b greatly appreciated as I need 2 know where 2 go on IE 2 stop anymore automatic downloads & trust me I'm desperate as I'm disabled & need my comp.& w/flash v.12 has screw up chrome 4 sure but  know how 2 disable flash on

  • How to aggregate a number of different objects in one

    Hi guys, My problem is the following: I am implementing a neural network for which i have a neuron interface. This neuron interface is then implemented by different types of neurons. Now i would like to aggregate these neurons in one object which wil

  • How to fix error in mru internal routine: ORA-20001?

    Hi, I created a tabular form to manage resources. But I'm not able to add new resource. There is a sequence as below. CREATE SEQUENCE "PM_PERSON_SEQ" MINVALUE 1 MAXVALUE 999999999999999999999999999 INCREMENT BY 1 START WITH 21 CACHE 20 NOORDER NOCYCL