AFS ARun: sales order not been selected for the allocation run.

Hi,
I am setting up the Purchase-to-Order (similar to Indiv PO item sales order) Process for SAP AFS.
When doing the Allocation Run (trx J3AT) after Goods receipt of Sales order stock, I get an error that ARun terminated because no requirements were selected. The delivery check report (/AFS/LIEF_CHECK) indicates that the sales order has not been selected for the allocation run.
For this process, I have set-up an Allocation type with
1. Requirement selection that does not exclude MTO/PTO orders
2. Set-up stock selection which includes physical stock type for MTO/PTO orders to the customer special stock MSKA with the segment KALAB.
Can someone suggest what I may have missed?
Regards,
PD

Hi Pankaj, I have same exact issue. How did you fix this ?
Thanks,
Mahesh

Similar Messages

Sales order cannot be created for the delivery date before 20.10.2008

when i create a sales order today (18102008) sales order cannot be created for the delivery date before 20.10.2008
how the system is checking the 2 days duration for delivery date - which table is having this duration days.
is it dependent on sales order type.....
actually i checkeup in V0V8 - even then i couldn't solve this error when i am creating the sales order.
Pls suggest

Dear Selvamuthu
In normal circumstances, you can create as many as sale orders as you can irrespective of delivery date, and system will not prevent to create unless you apply some user exit for some reason.
Check any user exit is applied for that sale document type where some logic would have been written in such a way that if stock is available, sale order can be created.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

MDW Disk Usage for Database Report Error - A data source has not been supplied for the data source DS_TraceEvents

Hello,
On the MDW Disk Usage Collection Set report, I get the following error when I click on a database hyperlink.
A data source has not been supplied for the data source DS_TraceEvents
SQL profiler shows the following SQL statements are executed (I've replaced the database name with databaseX)
1. exec sp_executesql N'SELECT
dtb.name AS [Name]
FROM
master.sys.databases AS dtb
WHERE
(dtb.name=@_msparam_0)',N'@_msparam_0 nvarchar(4000)',@_msparam_0=N'databaseX'
this returns zero rows as databaseX does not exist on my MDW central server, but is a database on a target server (i.e. one that is being monitored and uploaded into the MDW central server).
2. USE [datatbaseX]
this produces the following error:
Msg 911, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Database 'databaseX' does not exist. Make sure that the name is entered correctly.
why is the report looking for the database on my server?
thanks
Jag
Environment: MDW (Management Data Warehouse) on SQL 2008 R2

Hi Jag,
Based on my test, while this database is offline, we will encounter this issue. This is because that while we click the certain database in “Disk Usage Collection
Set” report, it will query some information with that certain database. If this database is offline, we will not access this database to acquire related information and generates this error.
Therefore I recommend that you check the status of this database by using this system view:
sys.databases. If it is not online, please execute
the following statements in a new window to make this database to be online:
USE master
GO
ALTER DATABASE <database name> SET ONLINE
GO
If anything is unclear, please let me know.
Regards,
Tom Li

Microsoft Word Has Not Been Installed for the Current User

Hi, everybody
I'm just starting our attempt to put together ZfD app packages for MS Office 2007. I've tried 2 different route with poor results for each. I'm looking for guidance and suggestions and, hey really, the simple final solution. :)
Objectives: Each app package will install locally one of the Office apps (e.g., Word) if it is not installed and then launch it, otherwise it will launch it. It gets installed locally to the C: drive using all the MS default choices, but runs from the desktop ZEN/NAL shortcut. All desktops are XP, not Vista or W7.
Routes tried and failed...
1) Simple app, uses distribution and run scripts to figure out if already installed, then installs using network shared drive and config.xml file for just the one app. The result ought to work -- no particular error in the package, those are fixed -- but what happens is something different each time with the MS setup.exe, and it never does complete without its own error (various and different each time). So, this appears to be completely unreliable because launching MS's setup.exe from a simple app is unpredictable and incomplete.
2) Snapshot of a successful setup.exe and config.xml install. This ALMOST works... well it does in fact work but the snapshotted app gives an error once it finishes launching -- "Microsoft Word Has Not Been Installed for the Current User" -- and exits. From the research I've done on this message, the MS program sees the "wrong" Windows profile on the destination environment, compared to that in the snapshot, and figures it's now been installed from a bootleg copy of Office 2007.
At this stage all I can think of is expletives. We've paid for everything, I've followed all the usual and customary steps, played by the rules, been polite (and also used the necessary computer swear words), and now I just want to insult everyone in Microsoft's marketing department for ruining everyone's life yet again. Can't we just do this, is it too much to ask!?!
Please help me. What is really going to work for distributing and maintaining Office 2007 apps using our ZfD environment? ALL USEFUL SUGGESTIONS WELCOME. Thank you. Bless you.
-Kent S.
Be strong as a ship and wise as a whale

These questions are really best in the Microsoft Office Forums.
These are MS Office Questions not ZEN Questions.
Novell did not design Microsoft's Office Install.
I have nothing against snapshots, but it does not work great with the Office
installs, which you yourself know since you are posting here with problems
based on that.
And your other method you are trying with the break out is not working well.
We also know that from experience.
We can tell you that the way most people install it and the way most people
succeed doing it, is by doing it the way recommended and designed by
Microsoft.
ZEN does that just fine.
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Knowledge Partner
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.
"KentFSmith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Thank you, Grimlock (-Grimlock?-)
>
> Through a google search I encountered a very close suggestion, and the
> poster said they couldn't remember the name of a MS utility but that
> there was one that would break out the individual MSIs from the Office
> 2007 setup.exe bundle. The dependent app appears to be a simple and
> possibly elegant solution, but without a good way to break out the MSIs
> I don't see how to do anything other than with a config.xml ('Config.xml
> file in the 2007 Office system'
> (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../cc179195.aspx)).
>
> Do you know of that utility and where I can find it?
>
> There is a lot of history here now of just doing the individual
> applications. Everyone gets Word and Excel, but much fewer get
> PowerPoint and Access. All other reasons aside, a compelling one is the
> reduced number of help calls to the Help Desk here. Occasionally we
> also just run the whole Office install for someone who needs some of the
> odd utilities, but that is easily cost-justifiable for us to break them
> out as exceptions. Otherwise, we focus 90% of our support on just Word
> and Excel and it pays off nicely.
>
> If we switch to putting full Office 2007 on all PCs then there may be a
> better approach that include other tools than ZfD, such as the fact that
> we replace 1/3 of all PCs in the organization each year (so that no
> hardware is more than 3 years "behind"). We could put 1/3 of all Office
> 2007 installs into the new PC image. But we still need to support all
> the use of the apps after the install, so ZfD MUST work well, it simply
> MUST work well or we're screwed, to use the vernacular. Also, just
> switching from what we've been doing for years -- single app orientation
> -- means introducing new-ish issues that have to discover and explain to
> our comrades, and to adjust our orientation with unknown future costs.
>
> But that may end up being the simplest adequate solution. And that's
> what I want.
>
> -K
>
> grimlock;1883526 Wrote:
>> Craig Wilson wrote:
>> > You should really focus on #1.
>> > Snapshot is not the way to go.
>> >
>> > Details about what is Not working or what random behavior may help
>> folks.
>> > Ask in the MS forums may help too. dont' mention zenworks.
>> > Just say you are installing as Administrator from a share and getting
>> these
>> > errors.
>> >
>> > While not 100% accurate, it should be good enough to get some good
>> feedback.
>> >
>>
>> Nor is installing 1 app at a time. Install the whole suite, have an
>> icon for each app that runs the exe for that app with a dependency on
>> the another app that points to the installer msi.
>>
>> If any user runs any app, it will run if the executable is there
>> (meaning it's been installed). If the executable is not there then it
>> calls the dependent application (the installer app) and installs it,
>> and
>> then runs it.
>
>
> --
> KentFSmith
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> KentFSmith's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=2927
> View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=391573
>
>

GL account has not been assigned for the excise a/c in customization

HI ,
When i try to post MIGO for PO i am getting the following error message .Please help me to solve this issue
GL account has not been assigned for CLEAR in customization
Message no. 8I447
Diagnosis
GL account has not been assigned for the excise a/c in customization
Procedure
Assign GL a/c for the excise a/c in CIN customization under : Accounting -> Assign GL accounts to excise groups and transaction types
Thanks & Regards,
Senthil

HI
I have maintained as you mentioned but i am getting the same error message.
Here i am using INT Charts of account and also i have one question when determining account for Excise whether we have to maintain CAIN charts of account please clarify me on this issue
Give me a good solution for the above issue
Thanks & Regards,
Senthil.

Audit has not been enabled for the appshell

Hi all,
We are not able to access "manage audit data" systems says that > Audit has not been enabled for the appshell.
we tried to check the status of the applications in the appshell, we can see that AuditON is set.
What are the other possible areas we could check?
Thanks

Well, if it would be so "by design" maybe a message should popup informing the customer that the Data Audit cannot be enabled on Apshell for some reason (?). This would be a proper way. But in this case you receive an error page where it's quite impossible to understand which is the problem.
I remember that there is also an internal message for this and it was recognized as a bug, but with a low priority.
Regards,
Simmaco

Sales order not shown up for VKM1 (credit block)

Hi All,
I have created the SO & its has exceeded the credit limit.
The system has put the devliery block due to (credit limit) & the header status is overall bloked but the credit status is showing as "not performed".when i try to list/release the SO from VKM1 or VKM3 the order it self is not visibile here.
Is't due the system status not updated correctly in the SO as "not approved" or else kindly help to let me know how to over come this problem.
Thanks.

Hi Hirshi,
System has performed the credit check & its has pop-up the warning message for the static credit check before saving the order & even the order is been blocked for delivery "with credit check".so that means system has done the credit check.
In OVA8 i hav't assigned any routinue for the "No credit check" its left blank.
Kinldy suggest.
Thanks

Sales Order creation/ change date for the items

I have a unique scenario and i need to get a Report for this
A sales order is created for 4 line items.
Out of these , for 2 line items a delivery is created. I need the sales order creation date and time for these 2 items in a custom report
Now the other 2 items go in to some kind of block- Now these are released by going in the sales order VA02 and after releasing the delivery is created. Again for these two items , i need the sales order change date as after a user goes and changes the sales order to remove the block only then delivery is created for these two items
Also another scenario is the 2 line items go for back order and when we get stock at tht time system confirms the stock and then the delivery is created for these. So also for this when this change occured i need to get the date for these 2 line items
Can any one please suggest how to get this data from the scenarios?
I dont want to get the date when the delivery is created as i can get tht from the LIKP table. I need the sales order create and change dates for these.

You may be aware, any changes to a document will be recorded in CDHDR (for header changes) and CDPOS (for item changes). You can explore these two tables.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Repeat credit check does not happen for already released sales orders when CMGST =D, for the second time using FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_CHECK

Hi,
I have written a routine which will call the FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_CHECK whenever there is a rejection and again unrejection of a same sales order, we are only concerned about already credit released sales orders, the scenario is as follow
1). Sales order created in the system --> Credit check --> Credit blocked
2). Release credit block manually CMGST =D
3). Reject sales order then unreject the same
4) Routine will determine rejection and unrejection of the order while saving and will call the FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_CHECK
5) The order is credit checked and blocked if necessary
All goes well till this point
but when the same sales order is rejeceted and unrejected multiple times either partially/ fully then the Custom routine calls the FM for credit check but the FM fails to put the order back on credit hold
in short the FM works only for the first time incase of mutiple rejection and unrejection of teh same sales order then the FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_CHECK fails to put the order back on credit hold from the second time onwards
if some one any idea of the behavior of this FM please share your thoughts and inputs . thanks !!

Issue resolved
The Standard FM “SD_ORDER_CREDIT _CHECK” uses the field “Release date of the document determined by credit management VBAK – CMFRE”
For any sales order that is manually credit released in a single day, Only one credit check is triggered (per day) if there is any change in the sales order and then the order goes back to credit hold and if again the order is manually credit released for the second time in a single day there will be no credit check (still the order will pass into FM but the update entry in the internal table will be blank)this is a standard functionality
Process of rejection and unrejection :
Blocked order -->released-->blocked again (first time after manual release same day) unrejected (same day) -->but no credit check (all this in a single day)
note : OVA8 - released document still unchecked = 0 Days , Deviation %= blank

VAT /CST% manually in the sales order,not getting copied to the Invoice

Dear Friends,
If I change the VAT /CST% manually in the sales order,its not getting copied to the Invoice
Thanks
Ivy

Dear Friends,
Thanks for your valuable inputs....
I have maintained the condition record for the combination of delivery plant region and the customer region.......assigned dummy tax code against the Tax condition...therefore I think there wont be any problem in posting billing doc to accounting doc.
There are different combinations,where sometimes the user is liable for 2% CST ....sometimes 4%CST... but I am able to pick one tax value say 12.5% CST across and maintained the tax condition types - manual entry has priority, as allowed the user to change the value manullay as per the user requirement ....
Now if i change the Tax condition value in the sales order ,the same is not reflecting in the Invoice....this also is applying from contract to a sales order...
Please advice me accordingly...
Thanks
Ivy

TS4268 My iMessage has not been working for the past week and a half (4/26/13)

My iMessage stopped working about a week and a half ago (today is 4/26/13), even when connected to my home WiFi. My fiance is having the same problem with his iMessage. Both of our iMessage and FaceTime accounts are "active" according to our iPhone settings. Friends who live across the country (we're in the USA) have asked us why we've stopped using iMessage. Please, HELP!!!

Thanks for the reply. I tried that, then updated my phone (which restarts everything). Those steps seem to have fixed the problem for now.

CENVAT Determination has not been maintained for the material

Hi Experts,
I am getting the above Warning Message while posting the GR.
Kindly give your inputs.
Regards
Pratap

In J1ID , u have to maintain the cenvat determination with input (rawmat) and output (FG mat) details against ur plant
ref the link
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/207dd2ad-bf92-2b10-a88b-e3a4a01ca7fc

Planned order not getting generated for FG

Dear Experts,
Planned orders not getting generated for the Finished Goods - X which is having MRP Type M0 - MPS fixing type strategy group 20 which is copied fron another FG - Y , its a new product and production plan has been updated through MC88 - Rough cut planning but the planned orders are not getting generated.
And for the material valid production version exists with selection method 3 and individullcollective as 1.
Please let me know what might be the possibalities and what all the key fields i need to check.
Thanks & Regards,
Sampath
Edited by: sampath s on Jul 13, 2011 11:31 AM

Dear,
In general MPS is run for High value items ( if you use like Gold , Platimum or A class items. ).
Always only single level is used for Explosion and planning. then only you can analyse the requirements at each stage before procurement.
Otherwise if you run MPS to multi level, Bottom most high value will be procured without any notice to authorities. Even you may cancel the process in mid way. At that time what will happen to the procured high value material.
So for that purpose only single item single level MPS concept is evolved.
Fo that you run MPS at single level so that only for the first level MPS will be carried out.
Check and revert back.\
Regards,
Alok Tiwari

How to re-trigger BA00 after sales order has been rescheduled

Dear Gurus,
Could you please kindly advise how I could re-trigger BA00 after sales order has been rescheduled?
The scenario is following:
When the sales order was completed, the order confirmation output has been sent to the customer. But later, when the ATP confirmed quantity was changed or order was rescheduled, the committed delivery date has been changed. It caused confusion, because in the order confirmation letter we sent to customer, there is a different date.
I'd like to also trigger BA00 to resend the order confirmation, but I checked the output routine, it only checks if the order is completed or not. Shall I　ask ABAPer to add additional logic in the routine or there is other easier way to re-trigger BA00?
Many thanks in advance!

Have you allowed multiple issue for BA00 output type? In that case, you can manually trigger it from VA02. If you are trying to have it sent automatically, then add the logic into the routine.

Deleted Sales Orders not Reflecting in BI

Dear Experts,
When ever my customer deletes a SO(Sales Order) in R/3, the reverse posting or deleted SO is not reflecting in BI. The Data source used is 2LIS_11_VAHDR. We are deleting the relavent SO in BW manually. But our customer wants to automate it.
Can any one suggest any setting in R/3 or BI for the changes to reflect?
Plz help.

Hi Raj,
check your data source support for reverse posting.
go to rsa6 select your data sourceselect changecheck weather the sales order field is selected for inversion. if it not do it.
and also check this condition
If the option Field recognized only in Customer Exit is chosen for the field, this field is not inverted. You cannot activate or deactivate inversion if this option is set.
hope this will give u some idea
regards
harikrishna N

AFS ARun: sales order not been selected for the allocation run.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for