After Update 2006-001 no file or printer sharing?

After installing Security Update 2006-001 Mac OS X 10.4.5 & iTunes 6.0.4, I'm having an issue. iTunes is shared over my network but I'm not showing anything in Finder>Network.
Most importantly, file and printer sharing are not working. My G5 doesn't recognize my PB and vice versa. Sharing preferences are intact. I'm not having other problems listed in discussions...

After installing the 2006-001 security update and re-booting, I have the exact same issue. My colleagues at work can no longer see me on the network, and I can no longer print on the network printer, nor can I even turn on personal file sharing! What more?... my iSync conduit doesn't work.
My internet connection is fine.
Any help would be appreciated!

Similar Messages

Safari slow after applying 2006-001 Sec update

After applying 2006-001 my Safari is slow to the point of useless. Same goes for Firefox. In Firefox I can see that name resolution is the killer - takes from 3 to 5 secs even using my own inhouse DNS server. Changing to public DNS server maskes no difference. I have tested ADSL bandwith and name resolution from Windows PC - everything is working perfect.
Tried to test if name resolution has generic problem, but DIG is fast as always.
Tried to reapply 2006-001 manually - made no difference. Has repaired permissions and cleaned caches using Onyx - still no difference.
Anybody got an idea what to do next ?

DivX Doctor is a freeware I had downloaded a few days before applying Security Update 2006-01 (http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/4683). It certainly was responsible for my problems with Office X apps because, as I said, they completely disappeared as soon as I got rid of it.
I hadn't the memory problems you mentioned (I've applied also Security update 2006-02 without problems).
Don't know if this can help, but you might want to give a try to Disk inventory X (http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/14393) [quote]Disk Inventory X is a disk usage utility for Mac OS X. It shows the sizes of files and folders in a special graphical way called "treemaps".
If you've ever wondered were all your disk space has gone, Disk Inventory X will help you to answer this question.[/quote]
Once DiskWarrior fixed a problem with free hard disk space on my machine, even though a small one.
iBook G4

After applying Security Update 2006-001 can't launch Office X apps

I noticed that, after applying Security Update 2006-001, I can't launch Microsoft Word nor Excel nor Power Point (Office X, 10.1.6 updated). If I double click the app icon, select and try to open from File menu or try to launch it from the Dock, I get the message "The app has unexpectedly quit". This does not affect Entourage so far. I can open existing files double clicking on their icons and, once the app is running, create new files from menu bar. Repaired permissions, checked for corrupted preferences files or templates but to no avail.
Can anybody help?
iBook G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) 512 MB RAM

DivX Doctor is a freeware I had downloaded a few days before applying Security Update 2006-01 (http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/4683). It certainly was responsible for my problems with Office X apps because, as I said, they completely disappeared as soon as I got rid of it.
I hadn't the memory problems you mentioned (I've applied also Security update 2006-02 without problems).
Don't know if this can help, but you might want to give a try to Disk inventory X (http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/14393) [quote]Disk Inventory X is a disk usage utility for Mac OS X. It shows the sizes of files and folders in a special graphical way called "treemaps".
If you've ever wondered were all your disk space has gone, Disk Inventory X will help you to answer this question.[/quote]
Once DiskWarrior fixed a problem with free hard disk space on my machine, even though a small one.
iBook G4

Menu Bar Icons Disappeared and other issues after Security Update 2006-001

Hi,
I was really affraid when i've heard about the Safari vulnerability, so I was really happy to see the Security Update 2006-001.
But after installing it, I'm having regrets:
* mouse speed turned to default settings
* system preferences crashes when i try to access to Mouse & Keyboard
* all the menu bar icons disappeared: Bluetooth, Airport, Time, EVEN Spotlight
* Finder is slower...
I've repaired disk permissions but: nothing happens....
What should I do please?
Should I wait?

How did you fix it? I'm having the same problem
myself.
Mandy,
I'm gonna tell you a secret, just like i said my problem wasn't due to the Security Update but because of Front Row.
How? Because, I've hacked my iMac (without iSight) to install FrontRow (with an update), and i've installed the Security Update at the same time. Restarted my computer, and thought the problem was due to the Security Update.
If you did the same thing, here's the trick to remove Front Row:
Delete Front Row (/System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app)
Install/reinstall the the latest Mac OS X Update Combo.
This article assumes you haven’t tried installing Front Row before without the use of Enabler. If you have used one of the very early versions of Front Row (ones installed without Enabler):
Delete Front Row (/System/Library/CoreServices/Front Row.app)
Delete the preference file (/System/Library/LaunchAgents/com.apple.frontrow.plist)
Remove any Login Items that launch Front Row (System Preferences >Accounts >User >Login Items)
Disable any shortcuts managed by third-party applications that launched Front Row.
Reboot and reinstall.

Focus switch to finder after Security Update 2006-001

Just updated with Security Update 2006-001 on PB G4 running 10.4.5.
While running Safari or Mail or any App. and not using the app (like when reading a webpage or mail message) the focus of the OS switches to the Finder after about 10 seconds or so. So in the top menubar right from Apple icon the OS switches from Safari or Mail to Finder.
Moving the mouse does not make any difference. i.e does not prevent or delay the switch.
Clicking on the application window returns focus to that application (Safari or Mail).
Anyone?

thanks for the input. did not resolve the probelm though. finder started to crash every 2 minutes.
but on the bright side: its a user thing. my guest account was not affected.
so i trashed most of my prefs. that resolved the finder problem.
currently working on restoring my prefs & email accounts, oh well

Security Update 2006-001 causes huge loss of memory

After running Security Update 2006-001 and updating Garageband, iPhoto and iTunes, per Software Update, my available GB of memory was reduced from approximately 110 to about 35! Yikes! What could have caused this, and how can I fix it?

Don't confuse memory & hard drive space. Running applications uses memory; storing files (application or document) use hard drive space. If you run memory-hungry apps, you may need to increase the RAM in your Mac to avoid slowdowns due to your Mac swapping data in memory (RAM) out to the hard drive. If you don't have adequate hard drive space to spare for this (usually 5 GB minimum, or 10% or more of your hard drive's free space), you may get crashes or other problems.
In any case, deleting files (from the hard drive) won't change the amount of memory (RAM) your Mac uses. That is controlled by the OS, in response to the demand of the application(s) you run. OS X has very good memory management; generally, all you will see is slowdowns if the demand is greater than the installed RAM can handle.
Are you seeing any problems, or are you just concerned that memory use is higher than you expect?

Did Security Update 2006-001 kill SpamAssassin 3.1.0?

Greetings,
It appears Apple's Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther) Security Update 2006-001 has killed my SA 3.1.0. After the update, upon starting spamd this is what happens:
Mar 3 14:05:00 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server started on UNIX
domain socket /tmp/spamd.sock (running version
3.1.0-agsvsoft_2005102101)
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server pid: 15757
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15759]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15759
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15760]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15760
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SS
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15762]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15762
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSS
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15763]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15763
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15759 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSS
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15764]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15764
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSSS
Mar 3 14:05:01 localhost spamd[15765]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully
spawned child process, pid 15765
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSSSS
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: server reached
--max-clients setting, consider raising it
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15762 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15760 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15763 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15764 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15766]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully
spawned child process, pid 15766
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SS
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15767]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15767
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSS
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15768]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15768
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSSS
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15769]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:02 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15769
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSSSS
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: server reached
--max-clients setting, consider raising it
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15765 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15767 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15766 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15768 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15770
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15770]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SS
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15771]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15771
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSS
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15772]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15772
Mar 3 14:05:03 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSSS
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15773]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15773
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSSSS
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: server reached
--max-clients setting, consider raising it
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15769 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15772 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15770 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15771 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: select returned error
on server filehandle:
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15774]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15774
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SS
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15775]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15775
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSS
Mar 3 14:05:04 localhost spamd[15776]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15776
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: handled cleanup of
child pid 15773 due to SIGCHLD
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: Use of uninitialized value in
numeric eq (==) at
/Library/Perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line 598.
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: Use of uninitialized value in
numeric eq (==) at
/Library/Perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line 598.
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: Use of uninitialized value in
numeric eq (==) at
/Library/Perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line 598.
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: Use of uninitialized value in
numeric eq (==) at
/Library/Perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line 598.
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: Use of uninitialized value in
numeric eq (==) at
/Library/Perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line 598.
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSSS
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15777]: setruid() not implemented at
/usr/bin/spamd line 875.
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: spamd: server successfully spawned child
process, pid 15777
Mar 3 14:05:05 localhost spamd[15757]: prefork: child states: SSSS
[snip]
Has anyone else seen this? I note from the release notes:
perl
CVE-ID: CVE-2005-4217
Available for: Mac OS X v10.3.9, Mac OS X Server v10.3.9
Impact: Perl programs may fail to drop privileges
Description: When a perl program running as root attempts to switch to another user ID, the operation may fail without notification to the program. This may cause a program to continue to run with root privileges, assuming they have been dropped. This can cause security issues in third-party tools. This update addresses the issue by preventing such applications from continuing if the operation fails. This issue does not affect Mac OS X v10.4 or later systems. Credit to Jason Self for reporting this issue.
Any advice would be most appreciated.
Cheers,
Damon
PowerMac G4-867 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

The update prevents spamd to run as the default user "nobody". Running it as root seems to be the only workaround.

Downloading Security Update 2006-001 STOPS (!) my internetconnexion

NO idea what this is: everytime I want to install new iTunes or Security Update 2006-001 , my internetconnexion falls out. Only then! After resetting router and modem all works fine again, but then when I want to install new iTunes or Security Update it happens again...?????
I work on iMac G5 -10.4.5
Anyone has an idea WHAT TO DO?? xxxTHANKS!xxx

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
Yes the same happened to me until my regular suggestion of repairing permissions solved it. Applications -> Utilities -> Disk Utility is where you select the hard disk and from First Aid repair permissions. For more upgrading tips, see this article which I wrote:
http://www.macmaps.com/upgradefaq.html
Disclaimer: Reference to links I make to my Macmaps.com website are a for your information only type reference. I do not get any profit from this page, and it is open to the public.

Security Update 2006-001 - The return?

Hello!
According to my software update which popped up after waking the computer I should install the latest security update (PowerPC), even though I installed it just a couple of days ago. Or, that's what I think...
Should I just go ahead and install this 'second edition' too, or is there a way to check if the first update was installed properly (and to check that it actually happened)?
Thank you!
PowerBook G4 Aluminum Mac OS X (10.4.5)

I installed security update 2006-001 last week and my SU shows nothing futher. And further, there is nothing further. Either your SU prefs are corrupted or it did not install properly.
Look in /library/receipts to verify that you have that receipt.
-mj
[email protected]

Security Update 2006-001 Killed network preferences

After upgrading with the 2006-001 Security Update, none of my network preferences will set up correctly anymore. DHCP doesn't seem to be doing anything, and when I tell it to use a manual address via the system preferences, it appears that it's not actually doing anything. Mac OS System Preferences will not even detect that I have an ethernet cable plugged in, though if I use ifconfig and route I can get a LITTLE bit of traffic to go out, so I know it's connected and working.
Any one have any ideas on this? Absolutely frustrating because I can no longer work until this is fixed (sitting in an internet cafe trying to figure out what the problem is). I'm running 10.3.9 on a 1.2Ghz 12" Powerbook. I don't remember my Unix days well enough to try to manually set up routes and our DNS settings, nor do I know if the appropriate tools are in Mac OS, but the Apple network preferences are clearly busted.
Is there anyway to uninstall an update?
Patrick
12" 1.2 Ghz PB Mac OS X (10.3.9)

I had the same Network & Airport issue after installing Security Update 2006-001 on my wife's iBook G3 running 10.3.9 Trying to access our Airport base station wirelessly would inevitably hang as I selected the Airport network.
I noticed that every time I shut down the computer there was a brief showing of the keychain window asking to allow keychain access...this right as the computer went down (no chance to hit the allow button).
Spent the better part of an entire afternoon trying to fix this problem. Then read all the posts here (amazing how many people have problems with this update). Tried to reset permissions - didn't work. In the end, I rebooted the Airport...went into the Airport Admin Utility with my PowerBook to fiddle around...removed our Airport network from the keychain in my wife's iBook...explored other aspects via the keychain access utility.
None of that seemed to work. I also figure I reset the permissions about half a dozen times (with subsequent reboot). None of that was working either...until after one permissions reset & reboot things came good. I got the keychain window, allowed access, and hey presto...online. So far it's been OK for over 12 hours (including after reboot).
What exactly worked? I don't know. "It's a mystery".
One thing's for sure...this update is not going on any of my other machines!
Come on Apple...surely you can do better than send us automatic updates that break our computers and sap our time!
iBook Mac OS X (10.3.9)

ITunes wont run after update today says missing file msvcr80.dll

iTunes wont run after update today says missing file msvcr80.dll
tried to reinstall, nothing changed.

Check out the user tip below.
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-6562

TS3595 After updating my iPad I can't print or log onto iTunes I was able to do both before

After updating my iPad I can't print or log onto iTunes I was able to before

Go to Settings>General>Date and Time>Set Automatically>Off. Set the date one year ahead. Try to update the apps again. If you get an error message, go back to the settings. Correct the date and time (set automatically) then go back and try to update the apps again.
Or try this ...
Settings>Privacy>Location Services>System Services (swipe to the bottom of the page to find this)>Location Based iAds>Off.
Or this ...
Reboot the iPad by holding down on the sleep and home buttons at the same time for about 10-15 seconds until the Apple Logo appears - ignore the red slider - let go of the buttons.

T61 XP-pro Microsoft file and printer sharing unchecks on Intel(R) 82566M NIC after reboot

I check Microsoft file and printer sharing but after reboot it is unchecked for Intel(R) 82566M NIC connection profile.
Anyone else seen this or fixed?
Message Edited by jbaaremartin on 07-18-2008 11:11 PM
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Problem was setting in security section for the profile in Thinkvantage Access Connections; it was set to cancel Microsoft File and Printer sharing.

File and Printer Sharing Problem with WRT54G

I am currently having problems sharing files over my network. My setup consists of:
3 laptops (wireless)
1 desktop (wired)
WRT54G V6.0 router with firmware version 1.00.9.
All of the computers have File and Printer Sharing enabled, unique names, and are on the same workgroup. However none of the computers can see one another. When I try to view workgroup computers for my network places, the explorer window stops responding for about 30 sec. and then spits out a dialog with the error:
"Workgroup is not accessable. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions.
The list of servers for this workgroup is not currently available."
I think that this problem has something to do with the router, as I have been successfuly sharing files and a printer with these settings using a microsoft 802.11b router for over a year. After purchasing the linksys and swapping it out with my old router, filesharing no longer functions.
I have spent a little time browsing the forums and have seen other posts from people with simmiler problems, but was unable to find any solutions.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks.

I'm having the same problems as you are, I have 2 computers on wired the other wireless the router is in between and I can't access from either side, although I can ping and remote connect but just cannot share files across the network. I have looked all over the forums too and there saying to ditch linksys and do something else.
Its not you thats caused this it is the firmware and the router that have the problems.
My Specs:
WRT-54G
v5.0
That new firmware update 1.00.9 just isn't working right. I might downgrade my fireware to fix this problem.
Message Edited by justin2006 on 09-26-200612:24 PM

E3000 file and printer sharing issues

Yes, there is at least one other thread on this but it looked a bit stale.
Last Friday I replaced my BEFSR41 router and WRT54G wireless access point (which had gone brick on me) with an E3000.The E3000 is configured as a DHCP server at 192.168.168.65 with a scope of 66-115. The only other non-default setting is that I opened up the custom port for my slingbox.
Prior to making the switch, I had several network shares on an XP desktop that I used frequently from my Vista laptop. Now, however, I can no longer even "see" any other computer from any of the computers on the network, much less access their shared folders. In other words, if I view the network from any of these machines, the only machine that shows up is the machine itself. Everything else (internet access, slingbox, a print server) is working just fine.
One of the suggestions in the other thread was to turn off Norton Internet Security, which is of course not a viable option. However I did check the settings, relaxed the network default to "Shared", and raised the XP desktop to "Full Trust". This had no effect.
I pinged the various computers, and was able to do so by their IP addresses, but not by their computer names (that worked with the old router). On a hunch, I tried creating a mapped drive, and that also worked when I used the IP address, but not when I used the computer name.
So - there's nothing wrong with the network configuration, or with how the shares are set up, and Norton isn't the problem. The only problem seems to be that names aren't being resolved, which could be affecting windows discovery, too. Did the BEFSR41 provide some local DNS functionality by default, and the E3000 doesn't? Is there an option I need to enable? If so, I can't find it. Perhaps I should explicitly add the E3000's internal IP address as a third nameserver??
A note on the "support" I tried to get before I turned to the forums: The "Chat agent" asked a bunch of questions, misunderstood my configuration and my problem, and once he finally did understand said "we don't support file and printer sharing". It took me several more questions to learn that he really meant that the Chat facility isn't the place for these questions - I had to call the 800 number. I did that, and after several minutes on hold, reached an agent. After going through everything again, and with the rep going on hold several times to "speak to his supervisor", he said it was "beyond his competence". I was eventually told I had to call another FEE-BASED service. I told him that was unacceptable.

Ok, another update and possibly some clues.
I was curious why at one point, when all the computers were in Workgroup2, that "Workgroup" still showed up in Explorer under the list of networks, but only on the two XP machines. Netscan showed this group association as well, which I then realized was the E3000 itself, in its role as a [I]potential[/I] NAS server. However there was no storage device attached.
Could this in itself cause the access error? If so, should users be advised that if they don't plan to host any storage, that they should to go to the E3000 Storage Administration page and change the workgroup name to something other than their actual workgroup name?
In my case, I changed it to "Workgroupx", though perphaps something like "StorageGroup" would be more meaningful, especially if the Workgroup computers could still access any storage I might install in the future.
Anyway, I repeated my original approach (after the above change and a router reboot), and at least got my original Workgroup reestablished to the point where the XP machines not longer get access errors, and most machines can access the shares on the XP desktop. The steps I used on each machine were:
remove any shares I had set up on any folders
uninstalled the File and Printer Sharing service
Accessed Computer Name properties page to change the workgroup name
Shut Down
After all 4 were done, I reversed the process:
Started computer (now coming up in new Workgroup)
Reinstalled File and Printer Sharing service
Checked visibility
At this point, the XP machines could see each other, and the Win7 and Vista machines could see each other, but initially these two cliques wouldn't interact.
Next I re-added the shared folders on the XP desktop, and the XP netbook could see and access them. After about an hour, the Win7 machine joined this clique, and could also access the shares. But six hours later, the Vista machine is still clueless. Netscan shows everything of course, and I used it to set up a mapped drive on the Vista machine to one of the shared folders.
Other possibly relevant facts:
The was all working fine with the BEFRS41/WAP54G combo
I can ping all machines by IP address, but not by name
On the Vista machine I can set up mapped drives to the XP's shared folders, but again, only by IP address.
At one point I removed NWLink from the XP desktop. Now, nbtstat -r only shows the printserver's name being resolved.
The two XP machines, being SP3, lack the LLTD responder.
So,
Is it possible the NetBIOS in NWLink was providing some kind of name caching? If so, should I reinstall the protocol driver (I don't think it is available on Win7)?
Should I request and apply the KB922120 hotfix to get LLTD onto the XP machines?
Perhaps in the morning, "by name" access will have returned, as it did on my first go-round. Needless to say this has been a real pain, what with all the reboots required. At least now I remember to hit F8 so I can select Safe Mode with Networking...

After Update 2006-001 no file or printer sharing?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for