After upgrade ZCM 10.3.4, DB grow very fast

HI All
I had test ZCM 10.3.4 in my lab, and it seem no critical problem.then I upgrade it on my customer production environment. When I upgrade ZCM completed...the DB and trans log size upgrade from 70G/2G to 102G/165G in 2 days....it is every terrible speed.
Now, DBA had truncate trans log , and size down to 2GB. but I still do not know why & what happen to my ZCM server....Who could tell me when upgrade to 10.3.4, What DB action that upgrade path will run (like clear NC_COMPCHANGES or PatchScanAuditLog)?
wyldkao

wyld,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/

Similar Messages

After upgrading to mountain lion my mac is very slow?

Hello
After upgrading to mountain lion my mac is very slow
It was starting in 10 seconds and shuting dow in 5 seconds and now it's taking more than one minute to start it or shut down it and everything is slow
why????????/
Thanks

First, back up all data immediately, as your boot drive might be failing.
Take these steps when you notice the problem.
Step 1
Launch the Activity Monitor application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Activity Monitor in the icon grid.
Select the CPU tab of the Activity Monitor window.
Select All Processes from the menu in the toolbar, if not already selected.
Click the heading of the % CPU column in the process table to sort the entries by CPU usage. You may have to click it twice to get the highest value at the top. What is it, and what is the process? Also post the values for % User, % System, and % Idle at the bottom of the window.
Select the System Memory tab. What values are shown in the bottom part of the window for Page outs and Swap used?
Next, select the Disk Activity tab. Post the approximate values shown for Reads in/sec and Writes out/sec (not Reads in and Writes out.)
Step 2
You must be logged in as an administrator to carry out this step.
Launch the Console application in the same way as above. Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left.
Post the 50 or so most recent messages in the log — the text, please, not a screenshot.
When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into a message.
Important: Some personal information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Edit it out before posting.

PSAPSR3 Tablespace is only growing very fast in PROD

Dear All,
In our Prod Server -> PSAPSR3 Tablespace is only growing very fast (Note : with 5 days i have extened 2 time PSAPSR3 table space) .
let me know the permament solution is only extending table space ? or any alternate solution to control specific table space growth ?
pls check DB02 Table space details :
PSAPSR3     219,640.00     10,010.81     95     YES     220,000.00     10,370.81     95     22     157,305     226,884     ONLINE     PERMANENT
PSAPSR3700     71,120.00     3,506.75     95     YES     170,000.00     102,386.75     40     17     868     11,389     ONLINE     PERMANENT
PSAPSR3USR     20.00     1.94     90     YES     10,000.00     9,981.94     0     1     38     108     ONLINE     PERMANENT
PSAPTEMP     4,260.00     4,260.00     0     YES     10,000.00     10,000.00     0     1     0     0     ONLINE     TEMPORARY
PSAPUNDO     10,000.00     8,391.44     16     NO     10,000.00     8,391.44     16     1     20     498     ONLINE     UNDO
SYSAUX     480.00     22.88     95     YES     10,000.00     9,542.88     5     1     991     2,633     ONLINE     PERMANENT
SYSTEM     880.00     5.44     99     YES     10,000.00     9,125.44     9     1     1,212     2,835     ONLINE     PERMANENT
Kindly advise

Dear MHO/Sunil/Eric,
still the PSAPSR3 tablespace keep on growing ,
Pls check the DB02 ,segments details .
SAPSR3     BALDAT          TABLE     PSAPSR3     42,622.000     268.800     853     5,455,616
SAPSR3     SYS_LOB0000072694C00007$$          LOBSEGMENT     PSAPSR3     5,914.000     191.533     277     756,992
SAPSR3     CDCLS          TABLE     PSAPSR3     9,091.000     38.400     327     1,163,648
SAPSR3     SYS_LOB0000082646C00006$$          LOBSEGMENT     PSAPSR3     1,664.000     37.067     209     212,992
SAPSR3     BALDAT~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     5,049.000     32.000     266     646,272
SAPSR3     EDI40          TABLE     PSAPSR3     3,155.000     23.467     233     403,840
SAPSR3     CDCLS~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     1,965.000     19.200     214     251,520
SAPSR3     BDCP2~001          INDEX     PSAPSR3     1,543.000     18.400     208     197,504
SAPSR3     BDCPS~1          INDEX     PSAPSR3     4,039.000     17.067     247     516,992
SAPSR3     APQD          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,671.000     17.067     210     213,888
SAPSR3     CDHDR~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     2,183.000     12.800     218     279,424
SAPSR3     CDHDR          TABLE     PSAPSR3     2,305.000     12.800     220     295,040
SAPSR3     BDCP2~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     1,000.000     12.533     196     128,000
SAPSR3     ZBIPRICING~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     320.000     10.600     111     40,960
SAPSR3     WRPL          TABLE     PSAPSR3     288.000     8.700     107     36,864
SAPSR3     FAGL_SPLINFO          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,016.000     8.000     198     130,048
SAPSR3     FAGL_SPLINFO_VAL~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     736.000     8.000     163     94,208
SAPSR3     ZBIPRICING          TABLE     PSAPSR3     208.000     6.931     97     26,624
SAPSR3     MARC~Y          INDEX     PSAPSR3     176.000     5.533     93     22,528
SYS     WRH$_ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY     WRH$_ACTIVE_2349179954_18942     TABLE PARTITION     SYSAUX     6.000     5.375     21     768
SAPSR3     MARC~VBM          INDEX     PSAPSR3     152.000     4.867     90     19,456
SAPSR3     MARC~D          INDEX     PSAPSR3     136.000     4.367     88     17,408
SAPSR3     FAGLFLEXA          TABLE     PSAPSR3     2,052.000     4.267     216     262,656
SAPSR3     RFBLG          TABLE     PSAPSR3     3,200.000     4.267     233     409,600
SAPSR3     BDCPS          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,280.000     4.267     203     163,840
SAPSR3     BDCP~POS          INDEX     PSAPSR3     3,392.000     4.267     236     434,176
SAPSR3     BALHDR          TABLE     PSAPSR3     864.000     4.000     179     110,592
SAPSR3     FAGL_SPLINFO~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     361.000     3.767     117     46,208
SAPSR3     ACCTIT          TABLE     PSAPSR3     289.000     3.733     108     36,992
SAPSR3     WRPT~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     112.000     3.731     85     14,336
SAPSR3     FAGL_SPLINFO_VAL          TABLE     PSAPSR3     448.000     3.467     127     57,344
SAPSR3     COEJ          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,089.000     3.200     201     139,392
SAPSR3     ZBISALEDATA3          TABLE     PSAPSR3     176.000     3.200     93     22,528
SAPSR3     COEP~1          INDEX     PSAPSR3     927.000     3.167     187     118,656
SAPSR3     GLPCP          TABLE     PSAPSR3     891.000     2.933     183     114,048
SAPSR3     ZBISALEDATA          TABLE     PSAPSR3     376.000     2.933     118     48,128
SAPSR3     WBBP          TABLE     PSAPSR3     344.000     2.933     114     44,032
SYS     WRH$_ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY     WRH$_ACTIVE_2349179954_18918     TABLE PARTITION     SYSAUX     6.000     2.594     21     768
SAPSR3     FAGL_SPLINFO~1          INDEX     PSAPSR3     280.000     2.400     106     35,840
SAPSR3     SE16N_CD_DATA          TABLE     PSAPSR3     72.000     2.333     80     9,216
SAPSR3     KONH          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,373.000     2.133     207     175,744
SAPSR3     GLPCA          TABLE     PSAPSR3     2,437.000     2.133     222     311,936
SAPSR3     BDCP~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     1,863.000     2.133     213     238,464
SAPSR3     SYS_LOB0000161775C00013$$          LOBSEGMENT     PSAPSR3700     5,210.000     2.133     266     666,880
SAPSR3     BDCPS~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     2,496.000     2.133     222     319,488
SAPSR3     D010TAB          TABLE     PSAPSR3700     2,176.000     2.133     217     278,528
SAPSR3     COEP          TABLE     PSAPSR3     2,117.000     2.133     217     270,976
SAPSR3     FAGLFLEXA~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     808.000     2.133     172     103,424
SAPSR3     BSIS          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,734.000     2.133     211     221,952
SAPSR3     BSAS          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,650.000     2.133     210     211,200
SAPSR3     GLPCA~3          INDEX     PSAPSR3     382.000     1.867     119     48,896
SAPSR3     BKPF          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,012.000     1.867     198     129,536
SAPSR3     FAGLFLEXA~3          INDEX     PSAPSR3     744.000     1.867     164     95,232
SAPSR3     FAGLFLEXA~2          INDEX     PSAPSR3     661.000     1.867     154     84,608
SAPSR3     WRPL~001          INDEX     PSAPSR3     112.000     1.867     85     14,336
SAPSR3     WRPL~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     112.000     1.667     85     14,336
SAPSR3     PCL2          TABLE     PSAPSR3     1,000.000     1.600     196     128,000
SAPSR3     GLPCA~2          INDEX     PSAPSR3     345.000     1.600     115     44,160
SAPSR3     FAGL_SPLINFO~3          INDEX     PSAPSR3     136.000     1.600     88     17,408
SAPSR3     MARC~WRK          INDEX     PSAPSR3     160.000     1.600     91     20,480
SAPSR3     MSEG          TABLE     PSAPSR3     136.000     1.600     88     17,408
SAPSR3     ZBISALEDATA~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     208.000     1.600     97     26,624
SAPSR3     ZBISALEDATA3~0          INDEX     PSAPSR3     195.000     1.500     96     24,960
SYS     WRH$_ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY     WRH$_ACTIVE_2349179954_18894     TABLE PARTITION
Kindly suggest

CAS Content lib growing very fast!! HELP.

Hello guys!!
The "SCCMContentLib" at CAS in my SCCM 2012 R2 was growing very fast! In 15 minutes increased 3GB!!
Anyone help me?
Thanks!!
Atenciosamente Julio Araujo

Is SP0 your CAS? It looks like the package is created there. You can read more about Content Library here:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg682083.aspx#BKMK_ContentLibrary and here
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg682083.aspx I would also like to suggest
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/de323e04-7bff-4d28-b76e-b4ab4c52cf4b/sccmcontentlib-on-cas?forum=configmanagerdeployment
Tim Nilimaa-Svärd | Blog: http://infoworks.tv | Twitter: @timnilimaa

Database data file growing very fast

Hi
I have a database that runs on SQL server 2000.
A few months back, the database was shifted to new server because the old server was crash.
There was no issue in old server which was used more than 10 years.
I noticed that the data file was growing very fast since the database was shifted to new server.
When I run "sp_spaceused", a lot of space are unused. Below is the result:
database size = 50950.81 MB
unallocated space = 14.44 MB
reserved = 52048960 KB
data = 9502168 KB
index size = 85408 KB
unused = 42461384 KB
When I run "sp_spacedused" only for one big table, the result is:
reserved = 19115904 KB
data = 4241992 KB
index size = 104 KB
unused = 14873808 KB
I had shrink the database and the size didn't reduce.
May I know how to reduce the size? Thanks.

Hallo Thu,
can you check whether you have active Jobs in Microsoft SQL Server Agent which may...
rebuild Indexes?
run maintenance Jobs of your application?
I'm quite confident that index maintenance will cause the "growth".
Shrinking the database is...
useless and
nonsence
if you have index maintenance Tasks. Shrinking the database means the move of data pages from the very end of the database to the first free part in the database file(s). This will cause index fragmentation.
If the nightly index maintenance Job will rebuild the Indexes it uses NEW space in the database for the allocation of space for the data pages!
Read the blog post from Paul Randal about it here:
http://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/paul/why-you-should-not-shrink-your-data-files/
MCM - SQL Server 2008
MCSE - SQL Server 2012
db Berater GmbH
SQL Server Blog (german only)

After upgrading to ios8, my iphone 5 is very slow.

After Upgrading to IO8, my iphone 5 is hanging on calls and while opening applications.

Try a reset: Simultaneously hold down the Home and On buttons until the device shuts down. Ignore the off slider if it appears. Once shut down is complete, if it doesn't restart on it own, turn the device back on using the On button. In some cases it also helps to double click the Home button and close all apps BEFORE doing the reset.

WWV_FLOW_DATA growing very fast

Hi,
We have a public application and we see wwv_flow_data growing very very fast (Up to 5Gb now).
In a way, this is a good sign ;) this means that we have a lot of hits... but we are also starting to see some contention on that table.
It would be nice to be able to set a purge sessions for public (nobody) sessions and another purge sessions for connected sessions.
We have some people that have to be connected all day , so we cannot purge sessions that are younger than 10 hours.
Is there another way to limit the number of records in wwv_flow_data than using wwv_flow_cache.purge_sessions(p_purge_sess_older_then_hrs => 24); ?
Thanks
Francis Mignault
http://insum-apex.blogspot.com/
http://www.insum.ca

In /f?p=4050:65 Apex report, I can see the sessions and users , anyway that I could use that to delete the records ?No, it doesn't let you select by user name.
You can login to the workspace, though, and navigate to:
Home>Administration>Manage Services>Manage Session State>Recent Sessions>Session Details
Here you can remove a session one-by-one. But that's probably too tedious.
Scott

ICS Issues after upgrade-This Ice Cream Sandwich is not very tasty

Background: I received the ICS upgrade last night and right away started having issues:.
Issues:
1 The downloading lasted several hours. I finally had to pull the battery and forced a reboot.
2-Once I got on and started selecting different apps I noticed that Gallery or pic apps and Music apps are having problems loading any of my files. It constantly produces forced close statement.
3-My battery is having difficulty getting to full charge. For the record, I didn't have any issues with my battery or apps prior to the upgrade install.
Comments: I'm not too happy with the update. I didn't request this upgrade and was happy with my phone just the way it was. In short; I had zero issues prior to this upgrade. .
Questions:
1-Am I the only one having these problems?
2-Is Verizon aware and will they be providing a fix for all these issues?
3-Is there somewhere I can get help with these issues?
Venting statement: Would you guys please thoroughly test the upgrades before you send them out to the masses?
Thank you for letting me vent. Now can someone please give me a workable solution?
Signed: Not finding this Ice Cream Sandwich very tasty

Well my first advice to you would be, when it asked you if you wanted to upgrade you could have said no.
The update OTA I had found is or was just too many people trying to update or did not follow the update guidelines. Must have at least 40% battery on the device. Better yet it should have been plugged into the wall electric. No turning the phone off.
I must say on my own update it was downloading slowly and taking over an hour just to reach 20% and then crapping out with a network error while downloading message.
you can and should just use Verizons Upgrade Assistant to get your update. I went that route and it took 7 minutes to get the needed files on my computer, and another 9 minutes to have it auto install the update on my phone.
please note do not turn your phone off even after the download finishes. Just keep it connected and on and it will scan your media card for photos, apps, music and make things work faster and better. you will note the phone will restart on its own when fully updated.

Trashed pics turn up again after upgrading to iPhoto 6..how to rid fast?

Prior to upgrading from iPhoto 05, I edited out many of my "lesser" pics. However, when I upgraded most of them were returned to my library & some albums.
Is there any faster way to identify & get rid of them rather than going back through pic by pic:-(?
thanks,Pat

Hi Pat,
I think you are just going to have to manually trash the photos again. This time, empty iPhoto's trash to delete them from iPhoto and the hard drive.

Performance issues after upgrading to 11g

hello,
We are facing a performance issue after upgrading from 10g to 11g.
as you can see, the tables named APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT has grown to 15544880 records,
and oracle is using TABLE ACCESS FULL on it:
DELETE FND_ENV_CONTEXT E
WHERE NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 'X'
FROM FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES P
WHERE P.CONCURRENT_PROCESS_ID = E.CONCURRENT_PROCESS_ID)
AND ROWNUM < 10000;
Plan:
DELETE STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 74,345
     5 DELETE APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT
          4 COUNT STOPKEY
               3 HASH JOIN RIGHT ANTI Cost: 74,345 Bytes: 3,108,980 Cardinality: 155,449
                    1 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES_U1 Cost: 166 Bytes: 315,450 Cardinality: 63,090
                    2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT Cost: 69,124 Bytes: 233,173,200 Cardinality: 15,544,880
select num_rows,last_analyzed from dba_tables where table_name='FND_ENV_CONTEXT'
15544880 07/07/2011 12:08:55
please advice.
Ofer

Please see these docs.
Table Fnd_env_context Growing Very Fast [ID 419990.1]
FND Related Tablespaces Growing at Rapid and Excessive Rate [ID 189800.1]
FNDCPPUR Request Does Not Always Delete Files From The File System, Many Files Will Be Denoted As "deletion failed" [ID 1335304.1]
Concurrent Processing - Best Practices for Performance for Concurrent Managers in E-Business Suite [ID 1057802.1]
Concurrent Processing - Purge Concurrent Request and/or Manager Data Program (FNDCPPUR) [ID 104282.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Stuck in login window after upgrading to Mavericks

I am unable to login with my (admin) account after upgrading to Mavericks yesterday.
This was very unfortunate considering that I didn't backup my data !!
On reboot (I do not remember whether it was the first or second time) I couldn't login anymore as I usually did.
I tried different procedures (entering secure mode, repair permissions, reinstall 2 times Mavericks) but cannot solve the stuck.
Then I thought it could be a nice idea to create a new admin user and followed this instructions (http://www.hackmac.org/tutorials/how-to-create-a-new-administrator-account/).
After that I was able to login with the new user, I backed-up my data but I was still in stuck on login window with the old user.
I tried to delete
com.apple.loginwindow.plist
com.apple.recentitems.plist
from /Users/XXX//Library/Preferences/ and tried to restart but nothing.
Now I wonder how my old and important user can start working again.
Thank you very much.
Giuliano

Restart and hold down the Command and R keys during startup.
On top, in the Menu Bar click the Utilities item then select Terminal.
In the Terminal window, type resetpassword and hit Return.
The Password reset utility launches/
Reset password.
Restart

Webtool extremely slow after upgrade to OEL 5.8

Running OSB 10.3.0.2.0 on OEL 5.8 64 bit. The original install was on OEL 5.3, but after upgrading to 5.8 the webtool is very slow on any browser (IE, Firefox, Chrome). Each page load takes about 40-50 seconds. Has anyone else experienced this or is this possibly a known issue?
Thank you.

I'd suggest you upgrade to OSB10.4.0.1.0 release.
Webtool taking ages is probably related to some other OS issue, check /var/log/messages and whatever and check your DNS settings are all correct.
What about obtool commands, are they also slow?
Thanks
Rich

Very fast growing STDERR# File

Hi experts,
I have stderr# files on two app-servers, which are growing very fast.
Problem is, I can't open the files via ST11 as they are to big.
Is there a guide, which explains what is it about and how I can manage this file (reset, ...)?
May it be a locking-log?
As I have a few entries in SM21 about failed locking.
I also can find entries about "call recv failed" and "comm error, cpic return code 020".
Thx in advance

Dear Christian,
Stderr* are used to record syslog and logon check, when the system is up, there should be only one being used, you can delete the others. for example, if the stderr1 is being used, then you can delete the stderr0.
stderr2,stderr3... Otherwise only shutting down the application server will allow deletion. When deleted the files will be created
again and only increase in size if the original issue causing it still exists, switching is internal and not controlled by size.
Some causes of 'stderr4' growth:
In the case of repeated input/output errors of a TemSe object (in particular in the background), large portions of trace information are written to stderr. This information is not necessary and not useful in this quantity.
Please review carefully following Notes :
   48400 : Reorganization of TemSe and Spool
(here delete old 'temse' objects)
RSPO0041 (or RSPO1041), RSBTCDEL: To delete old TemSe objects
RSPO1043 and RSTS0020 for the consistency check.
1140307 : STDERR1 or STDERR3 becomes unusually large
Please also run a Consistency Check of DB Tables as follows:
1. Run Transaction SM65
2. Select Goto ... Additional tests
3. Select "Consistency check DB Tables" and click execute.
4. Once you get the results check to see if you have any inconsistencies
   in any of your tables.
5. If there are any inconsistencies reported then run the "Background
   Procesing Analyses" (SM65 .. Goto ... Additional Tests) again.
   This time check both the "Consistency check DB Tables" and the
   "Remove Inconsistencies" option.
6. Run this a couple of times until all inconsistencies are removed from
   the tables.
Make sure you run this SM65 check when the system is quiet and no other batch jobs are running as this would put a lock on the TBTCO table till it finishes. This table may be needed by any other batch job that is running or scheduled to run at the time SM65 checks are running.
Running these jobs daily should ensure that the stderr files do not increase at this rate in the future.
If the system is running smoothly, these files should not grow very fast, because most of they just record the error information when it happening.
For more information about stderr please refer to the following note:
   12715: Collective note: problems with SCSA
          (the Note contains the information about what is in the stderr and how it created).
Regards,
Abhishek

Is it possible to restore OS X Mavericks icons after upgrading to Yosemite?

Is the a package to restore OS X Mavericks icons after upgrading to Yosemite?

ShadowDancer1000 wrote:
amacuser.1 wrote:
I think they missed the mark considering their target demographic tends to be looking for a more refined look and feel.
Apple's U/I target demo lately has been women. Sad fact, but already proven by several design study articles and business analytics that look at which market share demographic was growing fastest when it parsed through Apple's sales.
http://www.businessinsider.com/is-ios-7-for-girls-2013-9
It's sad that women are a target demographic? Why?
As part of that demographic, I can't say that I get the feeling that Apple is trying to appeal to me. It seems to me that they are assuming that ALL of their users are fairly clueless, not just the female users.
I hardly think the interface changes are due to a desire to market to women. They certainly aren't impressing me, whatever the intent. I don't hate the look of Yosemite, but I don't like it, either. The translucency is a bizarre touch, pointless in terms of function and at odds with the generally joyless flat aesthetic.

Any performance gains after upgrade to Oracle 10 ?

Hello,
we have been using EBS 11.5.9 (with Oracle 9). Does anybody see any improvements from performance point of view after upgrade to Oracle 10r2 (but without upgrade of EBS to R12) ?
Regards

Somethings have been faster for us and somethings have been slower. In general it seems the same or better. When we get a chance to look at the jobs that are performing poorly I'm sure we will be able to make them perform. Make sure you find and apply all of the performance patches for the modules you have implemented, we are missing one right now and it is hurting our Configurator developers instance. I have actually set the the optimizer_features_enable back to 9i. This is something I would not recommend doing in a production environment, and we are only doing it until we can get the patch that fixes the optimizer in 10g applied.
One surprise for us was the increase in memory required, in our test and development instances we have found a 1GB SGA is as small as you can go with 10g and still have reasonable performance. We had a number of 9i ebus databases around 300-400MB SGA that performed just fine. This limited the number of environments we could squeeze on a single server (not really a bid deal if you only have a few dev, test and training environments).
In our production environment in order to have the same size datacache more memory was consumed. Were we could get away with a shared pool of 4GB under 9i, it grows to over 6GB in 10g. Looks like more PGA is also being used. 10g along with RUP5 and upgrading the java from 1.3 to 1.5 has increased our memory consumption. We increased memory from 64GB to 96GB and we are using a large portion of the additional 32GB. We were right at the limit with 64GB in our 9i production instance but we had never experienced the paging that we did with 10g. Now at 96GB we nolonger see any paging.

After upgrade ZCM 10.3.4, DB grow very fast

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for