Aggregation of Purchase requisition in Optimizer

Happy Diwali to all,
Can we club the purchase requisitions generated from SNP optimizer to one requisition for month, as SNP optimizer will plan for optimize the solution by generating requisitions with qty 2,3, or 7 and 8 qty, Now i want to club all the requisitions to one requisition to total quantity 20 Nos.
Can any body address me how can i tackle the situation, as i want the clubbed requisitions to book the vendors capacity for 6 months or year with higher quantity.
Regards,
Amol Chavan

Dear Ian,
We have tried by creaating planning book of monthly bucket but results are not satisfactory, Is it possible to club the requisitions by PPDS heuristic in lot size procedure by periods.
Regards,
Amol

Similar Messages

  • Purchase Requisition Transfers from SCM 5.0 APO to R/3

    I am working on SCM 5.0 -- transferring Purchase Requisitions from APO to R/3 from SNP heurristic run. I am wondering if there is any documented procedure of available options and the steps involved in setting up.
    Can you transfer only certain Purchase Requisitions instead of ALL?
    Can you setup approval workflow to allow the transfer of only approved PRs ?
    What steps involved to get PRs from the SNP Heuristic?
    I found the IMG Activity (SAP SCM – Implementation Guide  Advanced Planning and Optimization  Supply Chain Planning  Supply Network Planning (SNP)  Basic Settings  Configure Transfer to OLTP system).
    I shall greatly apprecaite if some one answers the questions and points me to some 'How to Guide or the steps involved in setting up'.
    Thanks

    Devendra,
    You actually need the SCM-APO-CIF  (Core Interface) Training for this. A Pre-requisite to that is the APO Overview.  Have you undergone it ?
    In Short i will tell you the answers you want ...  I hope you will reward me with Points if you feel it was helpful.
    To Transfer PRs from APO to R3 following setup is needed ..
    - Do Configuration of  STO (Stock Transfer) in R3.  Ensure Stock Transfer PRs and STOs between the 2 Plants can be created Manually in R3.  This will require you to do a Lot of MM & SD Configuration on IntraCompany STOs.
    A Key Part for APO is to set the STO Order Types for the
    Source and Destination Plant,  Assign Vendor to the Shipping Plant,  Customer to the Destination Plant .. etc. A Test of correct setup is your ability to create a PR and STO manually in R3 first before you do APO.
    - Setup of all APO Locations (Plants in SAP-R3), Products (Materials in SAP-R3).  These are done via the Location and Product Integration Models.  Make sure you have defined the Timezone in the Plant and set the Plant in SAP as DC or Production Plant (Refer CIF Training).
    -  Setup of  Transport Lanes in APO (done manually in APO).
    You define Transport Durations here.
    -  You have to have the Purchase Requisition Integration Model Active for those Product Locations.  To do the Integration Model all CIF Configuration including the one IMG you have described in your Question is to be done. Assuming that the Products are set to 'X0' MRP Type in R3 ... so they are set to Planning in APO.
    -  For Setup in "Configure Transfer to OLTP" it is best to select 'Periodic Transfer' so you can actually control the Product-Locations and Date Range of PRs APO has created.  The Planning Runs create 'Change Pointers' to send the PRs to R3.
    - Define in APO that you will be sending Purchase Requisitions at your Destination Location to R3.  You use 'Publish Change Pointers' - /sapapo/cp1 to do this.
    - The Change Pointers are created after APO Planning run which can be sent to R3 using /sapapo/c5.  You should send them periodically after you're satisfied with the planning results or in Night Batch runs after your Planning run.
    -  To Control some type of PRs you will have to use User Exits in APO for CIF that send External Procurement / PRs from APO to R3.  This is not Standard.  But I am not sure why you will  have different types of PRs for Stock Transfer between 2 Plants.  There is no need.  You can control PRs between 2 Locations to not go to R3, via the selection of locations in /sapapo/c5.
    Hope you find this usefull.
    Regards,
    Ambrish Mathur

  • SNP Heuristic: Creation of purchase requisition

    Hi experts,
    we face following problem: heuristic creates purchase orders when there is no source of supply.
    Background:
    there is a forecast demand for a location product on a customer location without transport lane to the production plant due to false master data.
    The SNP heuristic generates purchase requisitions to fulfill the demand and there is no requirements shortage.
    So it is hard to recognize which forecast demands can't be fulfilled.
    Is there a parameter in material master or in a heuristic profie which disables the creation of purchase requisitions in snp heuristic when there is no source of supply.
    If no purchase requisition is created there will be a requirement shortage which can be recognised by an alert.
    Thanks for your help.
    Robert

    hi.
    As per heuristic process , the system will create a purchase requisition if there are no Tlane exists and the material's procurement type is F/X since it is a infinite planning.
    Now you can use a optimizer or CTM to restrict the system from creating purchase requisition.
    Also you can try with location heuristic.
    Hope this can help.
    regards,
    kaushik

  • Search purchase requisition class

    Hi all,
    i search a class for manipulate purchase requisition object. I don't find it.
    For purchase order i use CL_PO_HEADER_HANDLE_MM, but for purchase requisition ?
    Thanks a lot.
    Cheers.

    Hello Together
    The interface IF_PURCHASE_REQUISITION is implemented by the classes
    CL_REQUISITION_AGGREGATE_MM
    CL_REQ_HEADER_PROXY_MM
    However, I am neither sure whether these are the right classes nor how to instantiate them correctly.
    In any case the entire OO-purchase requisition functionality is aggregated into function MEREQ where you will find a plethora of LOCAL classes.
    This function group has a module called MEREQ_GET_FACTORY which sounds like the instantiation machinery. If you find out how to do please publish your coding for the entire SDN community.
    If you are able to instantiate these local classes this is by no means useless as you can see in my Wiki posting
    [Accessing the Inacessible - Local Classes within Global Classes|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/AccessingtheInacessible-LocalClasseswithinGlobalClasses]
    Regards
      Uwe

  • Purchase Requisitions opening date in past

    Hi Experts,
    We are using SNP Optimizer (SCM 7.0).
    We are facing issue with Purchase Requisition Opening Date is showing in past.
    Lets say Planned Delivery time for externally procured material (Componenent) is 30 days and there is NO stock of this component.
    This componenent is input to Finished goods which has forecast on 15th March and there is NO stock.
    As planned delivery time is 30 days, earliest componenet can be procured will be 8th April (today is 9th march).
    Opening period should be shown as 8th April but I am seeing opening date of this compoenent in February which is past.
    Why it is creating Pur Req in past openign date with receive date as today's date?
    Regards,
    Vipul

    Hi Santosh,
    No, we are not using opening period or stock transfer horizon.
    Regards,
    Vipul

  • FI MM integration with purchase requisition

    Hi,
    For FI MM integration - acquire asset through MM - the process is -
    1) create asset master
    2) Purchase requisition
    3) PO
    4) Assign asset master to PO
    5)Goods receipt
    It is difficult to create an asset master in advance, so the solution is to create purchase requisition without account assignment.
    I would like to know whether this is possible. because once we select Account assignment category "A" system does not allow us to save the Purchase requisition.
    Can someone pl. help me understand how to achieve this.
    Thank you
    - Vedavatee

    Hi vedavatee,
    You need to assign Asset Number since PR when you are using Account Assignment A.

  • Error in new purchase requisitions, for already deliverd materials

    Dear all,
    I have a problem with newly created purchase requisitions, although material was partially delivered and no delivery is expected anymore.
    For example I have ordered 1767kg of oil and a total sum of 1766.2kg was deliverd. This means only a minor amount of material was not deliverd and only 80gramm are missing. The purchase value key allows a 5% over and under delivery.
    Usually I would expect, that because of the purchasing value key of 5 % over and under deliverance allowence this situation should not occur anymore. Additionally at the time of goods receipt the key of final delivery was set and the purchase order is updated correctly.
    But when I run the MRP again I will have another purchase requisition. The dependend requiement of the material above still existis as production is not finished yet or this is still a planned order.
    What keys do I need to set in total for allowing a "partial delivery"?
    - Purchaseing value key in the material master
    - Delivery completed at the time of goods receipt
    Maybe this question is to basic as I cannot find any questions / answers related to this issue here in the forum.
    In some points, I found that I need to set up the vendor accordingly to set up partial deliveries. But I cannot find the right setting to allow the vendor to do so. I use MK02 for the change of the vendor settings.
    Thank you very much for your support!
    With best greetings,
    Bjoern

    Hello Jürgen,
    yes after thinking about this issue again, I think this might not be an appropriate solution. Now I am thinking about other possibilities.
    1) Automatically change the value in the production order at the time of saving MIGO - will not create any more missing material messages and no new purchase requisitions .
    2) Errror message, that for this positions no more postings are possible as the purchase order still remains "open"
    3) I need to find the customizing of the indicator "delivery completed". At the moment I just dont see, the influence of this indicator.
    Sorry for my "stupid" questions, but I am quiete new to these MM topics. Up to now I was always doing only PP and QM but our collegue for MM has left the team and there are some open issues which now belong to me. Lucky me.
    I have created a new posting at:
    With best greetings,
    Bjoern

  • Error in creation of purchase requisition

    Hello Sap Guru,
    When we are trying to create a purchase requisition under t.code ME51N, we are getting error message "enter valuation price"?
    If anyone can please explain the reason & solution of this error.
    Thanks In advance
    Deepak Garg

    {code)When we are trying to create a purchase requisition under t.code ME51N, we are getting error message "enter valuation price"?{code)
    Hi,
    it is sap standard process when you create PR and if material master record exist the price is automatically taken from the valuation price field. if record not exist enter lum sum price of requested material price.
    When purchase guy create po with reference to Pr they can change valuation price also.
    In custommization for Purchasing under Purchase Requisition -> Define Screen Layout at Document Level, you can set price and price unit. The Valuation price field can be set as a mandatory or optional input field.

  • Help needed for enhancement in Purchase requisition

    Hi all,
    Our client uses me59n to generate PO's automatically using purchase requisitions.
    Now, the requirement is ...
    If net Purchase value  is 0 in purchase requisition, then
    Free(UMSON) field in Purchase order shoud be "checked".
    lemme explain the steps a bit detail.
    1. lots of purchase requisitions will be created in me51n.
    2. Client will use me59n to generate PO's automatically, using Purchase requisitions.
    3. purchase orders will be created.
    3. Now, i am in search of a badi/user exit , which will
         if netPurchasevalue(gswrt) = 0
            (free)umson = X.
         endif.
    so , i need a enhancement, which links both fields(gswrt) from purReq & (umson) in PO. 
    please lemme know if anybody have experience on similar issues earlier.
    Regards.
    santosh.

    Hi,
    Try implementing the BADI -ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST ...the method "PROCESS_ITEM" can be used to do the check that you want...
    Thanks,
    Renjith

  • Service Number is not getting updated in the Purchase Requisition

    Hi All,
    When i create a Service PR using bapi BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE FM , service details ( Service number, Qty, Gross price, ) are not getting updated in Service tab of Purchase requisition transaction. I am passing all the services related parameters in the FM.
    Please clarify this.
    Thanks for the help.
    Vinoth

    Hi Vinoth,
    Are you getting any error in the return table?Can you show your coding?
    Regards,
    ravi

  • Purchase requisition is not being displayed in FM area, CJIA

    Hi
    Project cash management is activated in our system, when creating purchase requisition from project builder with account assignment 'Q' system does not generating any document in FM area (CJIA). Contradicting to this, system generating document in FM area when creating purchase requisition through ME51N transaction with account assignment Q and setting project WBS to account assignment object.
    Later, comparing both purchase requisitions using ME5J, field committed item showing different values (default layout do not display this field, need to added from change layout settings). Can any one help us to find the settings which derives the committed item field in purchase requisition?
    Screen shots are attached for detailed understanding.
    Thanks

    Sanjeev,
    In EBAN table both records are present with special stock indicator Q.  But these documents are not available in second table COOI.
    In customizing, KOAB for order category 20 (network) don't have indicator commitment management, whereas different order category having this indicator. Possibly, this would be causing the issue?? if so please help us in this direction. One more point that component with item category L (non-stock) are displayed in CJIA report.
    Checked OPSV and found both the check boxes are ticked for order category 20.
    Thanks

  • Purchase Requisition not getting generated in APO

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue in APO. Once I confirm a sales order, I have to run the Product Heuristic in APO to generate the purchase requisition through rrp3. The problem is the purchase requisition is getting generated without the PR number. The line does not show the number and also the purchase req is not reflecting in ECC. Please refer the screenshot. Kindly help me with this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Raja S

    Hi Guys,
    Sorry for the delayed response. Now got another issue. My CIF model for a Sales Order is not getting activated. I also cleared the queue in APO through /sapapo/cq and then start running the CIF. But it runs for a long period.
    What could be the other possible issues with CIF model activation?
    I am getting a message box like the below when try to activate the CIF. I keep ignoring the message and trying to run the CIF. But still I am unable to resolve. Kindly help
    After resolving this only, I can go for the above mentioned issue. I sincerely thank all your support.
    Regards
    Raja S

  • Purchase Requisition Is Being Getting Created In APO But not being publishe

    On doing, SNP Location Heuristics on  one of our item, purchase requisition is being getting created in APO (We are able to see the same in RRP3) but the same is not being getting published in ECC. On doing CCR of the said location - product combination, it is showing Error u201C182u201D. We have checked the following parameters :-
    Item is an APO Item i.e. X0.
    It is having a proper Purchasing Group.
    As This be a purchase item. So, it is having a valid single Purchase Info Record.
    Item Has Not Been Blocked At Any Level.
    Vendor From Whom This Item is being getting procured is also open (Not Blocked).
    Please suggest what else to be checked  and what else can be the reason for non-flowing of purchase requisition from APO to ECC.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Sanjeev Chugh

    Hi Sanjeev,
    Please check change pointers if any and send them to ECC. Check the order in the planning book whether it has picked the same source for which there is a Purchase info record. If these all are fine then You send them to ECC from the CCR then check the log in ECC through CFG1 tcode.
    Regards,
    Kishore k Reddy

  • Release strategy for purchase requisition does not kick in

    Hi Gurus!
    I've been struggling with this issue for some weeks now.
    I have set up the release strategy configuration for purchase requisitions with classifications.
    However, if I create a purchase requisition the release functionality is not taken into account by the system.
    See below some more information regarding my configuration:
    1. I've created a new characteristic "REL_PR_GROUP". Status: released, Multiple values, Number of Chars 3, 7 values (TR1, TR2, TR3....TR7), Table name: CEBAN, Field name: EKGRP, Procedure for value assignment set to not ready for input.
    2. I've created a new class: "REL_PR_ANPC". Class type 032, Status: released, Same classification: do not check, Char: "REL_PR_GROUP"
    3. I have one release group "T1", Rel. object 1, OverReqRel is marked, Class: "REL_PR_ANPC"
    4. I have 5 release codes. Grp: T1, Code: 01....05
    5. I have 2 release indicators:
    "R = Released", Rel. for ordering is marked, Changeabil: 4, Value chgs. 100,0
    "X = Blocked",  Changeabil: 4, Value chgs. 100,0
    6. I have 1 release strategy:
    "T1 with Grp T1"
    - one release group, 01 Manager
    - release prerequisites not applicable because of only one release group
    - release status, nothing marked = blocked, 01 marked = released
    - classification, purchasing group is TR1 or TR2 or TR3 or TR4 or TR5 or TR6 or TR7
    I intentionally kept the configuration as simple as possible so I can try to get it working first.
    Now if I create a purchase requisition for an item with release group T1, I would expect the release strategy to be activated. However, this is not the case. I don't see the "release status" tab in the PR, and if I try to relase via ME54 the system says the PR is not relevant for release.
    Could you please assist in getting this working?

    Hi,
    Have you checked in CL30/CL30N if your release strategy is derived successfully?
    See section 3 of Note 365604. A small section of it:
    You can use transaction CL30 search for an object using the data
    of the purchase requisition/purchase order. Here, it is important
    that the object search determines exactly one strategy. If this
    is not the case, this indicates that there are overlapping
    strategies in the system or that the release strategies in
    Customizing do not correspond with those from transaction CL24.
    See the previous point. If the object search returns more than
    one result, the system subsequently determines an incorrect
    release strategy or no release strategy at all.
    If it is derived successfully, next, check the user exit EXIT_SAPLEBND_001 as per Note 371667:
    The following assignment statement has to exist within activated SAP
    enhancements M06B0002 (include zxm06u13) and M06B0005 (include zxm06u31)
    for purchase requisitions:
         E_CEBAN = I_CEBAN.
    Regards,
    Purnima.

  • Purchase requisition report.

    Hi,
          Is there any standard report for purchase requisitions, showing purchase requistion number, user created, plant and some basic stuff like that.
          Can anyone pls assist me with this.
    thanks in advance,
    Ravi Boppana

    Hi,
         ME5A has pretty much all the information we are looking for. Thank you very much. But is there a way that we can restrict users to see their own requisitions. Ideally we dont want a user to see requisitions created by other users.
        If there is some way like that, it would be perfect for our situation.
        Thank You very much
    Ravi Boppana

Maybe you are looking for