Agp 8x Comp With My Mobo?

Will the MSI FX5200 TD128 8x Agp card work on my MSI Sis 745 Ultra which is only 4x Agp I hope so cause I wanna buy this card with out havin to update the motherboard Possible??? ?(

Ok so as i understand my G4 Ti4200 td64 (AGP 4x, AGP 2,0)will run without problems with a new AGP 8x ( AGP 3.0 ?)mobo?
I've read that it was more complicated. That it was a Pb of voltage.
Are all AGP 4x running on 1.5 or 0.8 V?

Similar Messages

  • HELP! i got a problem with my mobo 945GCM7-L

    HELP! i got a problem with my mobo 945GCM7-L
    specs;
    *mobo = MSI 945GCM7-L(MS-7507) driver installed
    *cpu = Intel Pentium E2180, LGA 775
    *BIOS = american megatrends version 3.1
    *sdram = DDR 2 1Gb
    *GPU = sparkle/ nvidia 8500gt ddr2 1Gb128 bit (direct X9.0c and driver installed)
    *HDD = seagate sata 80Gb (3Gb speed enabled 'no jumper')
    *OS = XP PRO SP2
    PROBLEM:
    *sometimes it just hang-up (one application only) like a simple Microsoft word 2007.
    *while playing DOTA (LAN gaming) = in just a couple of minutes you will experience a lagged then suddenly you'll be disconnected from the game
    Isolation:
    change the SDRAM with lower and higher RAM = same problem
    change the GPU with higher and lower model (driver installed) = same problem
    cable connection + good connection = same problem
    take note;
    I GOT 4 UNITS WITH THE SAME SPECS = 4 UNITS WITH THE SAME PROBLEM
    NOW WHAT???

    Does it hang using the onboard VGA?  Try with prime 95 or orthos for stability testing, what spec are your psus?
    You could try the v3.2 BIOS but I'm not sure it will help you.

  • I Don't have access to the previous computer on which i installed the photoshop, the m bord is broken and i have a new computer, how can i reinstall on my new comp' with my serial number?

    I Don't have access to the previous computer on which i installed the photoshop, the m bord is broken and i have a new computer, how can i reinstall on my new comp' with my serial number?

    You are allowed to have two machines with activated installations, so if you only had one installation, you still have the option to install on a second without doing anything further than that.  If you originally downloaded the purchase thru Adobe then you might find a download link available in your Adobe account online.  You can also download thru the following page if you can find your version:
    Download and Installation Help -
    https://helpx.adobe.com/download-install.html
    You can have the first installation deactivated to free up the activation and have it available for another machine again as well.  YOu need to contact Adobe Support thru chat for that.  For the link below click the Still Need Help? option in the blue area at the bottom and choose the chat option...
    Serial number and activation chat support (non-CC)
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service1.html ( http://adobe.ly/1aYjbSC )

  • My comp with Windows7 doesn´t recognise iPhone 5c. I reinstalled USB drivers,iTunes,restarted both devices but without positive result. iPad is recognised on the same comp without problems. Could me somebody help?

    My comp with Windows7 doesn´t recognise iPhone 5c. I reinstalled USB drivers,iTunes,restarted both devices but without positive result. iPad is recognised on the same comp without problems. Could me somebody help?

    Hi there tsubert,
    You may find the troubleshooting steps in the article below helpful.
    iOS: Device not recognized in iTunes for Windows
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1538
    -Griff W. 

  • Can a PC ATI X1600 XT AGP card work with my MDD..

    Can a PC ATI X1600 XT AGP card work with my MDD?

    I have a friend that made the mistake of buying a (new) non-Mac edition ATI card. Not the card you've specified, this was a few years ago, but everything worked for him, with OSX. His biggest issue was the loss of the ADC connection on the card, getting DVI connectors only instead. That means a trip to Apple to get an ADC-DVI converter, mine was about £100 for my second display. My friend payed slightly less. At the end of the day, it would have been cheaper for him to pay the £30 extra for the Mac edition.

  • Problem with 6700 6.1 in counter strike source with msi mobo

    hi,
    i've just baught a 6700 6.1 set and they work fine in windows, dvds and the msi speaker set up test. but in counter strike sources speaker test and in game only the centre and sub work. i've changed the speaker settings in windows and source with no luck.
    my msi mobo (k8n neo2) has 7.1 built in but only offers 2channel 4channel 5.1 or 7.1 options so i am using my speakers in 5.1 when i run the speaker set up test provided with my mobo the right speaker is highlighted and then plays a sound but in the source speeker test only the centre and sub actually make a sound when they are iluminated i have tryed all combinations off the msi set up and source set up and the problem does not change.
    i was wondering what i could do or if this problem has been heard of before.
    if i have missed any information out that u need 2 know just ask and il let u know
    thanks a lot

    If I dun remember wrongly, there's a switch at the woofer. Try changing that to direct mode.

  • RMI Performance Comp. with Forte

    Hi All,
    I know that this topic has been discussed on the list
    already, but I would like to find out whether the
    current state of Sun's RMI implementation is like
    I imagine it, and I want to compare with our Forte
    Service objects too. Basically, these seem to be
    issues that negatively affect performance,
    1. A thread is created on the server per request, and
    there is no way to change this easily (i.e. reuse
    threads from a pool)
    2. Each call opens a new socket.
    In particular, does it make sense to replace RMI with
    CORBA for increased performance and scalability? Can a
    PC-based server handle loads of about 1000 remote
    calls per second (considering the overhead imposed by
    RMI/other communication methods only)? or Shall we
    compare Forte against RMI.
    Thankx,
    Babu

    Okay,
    A method invocation (or function call or procedure call or whatever) is
    always a synchronous call. This means, you ask the service to do something
    and wait for the function to complete, optionally with return values. It is
    possible, that within the method, a separate thread is started, that
    continues after the method is completed, but that doesn't change the
    mechanism that a method invocation is a synchronous call.
    In Forte, it is possible to start a method as an asynchronous call, with the
    "start task" command. In that case, the caller does not wait for the method
    to complete and return values are not handled. If this method invocation
    happens across a network (making it a Remote Method Invocation) then a
    socket will be opened when the call is made and closed immediately after. It
    does solve the one-socket-per-caller problem, but not the
    one-thread-per-caller problem. Also, it does remove the possibility of
    receiving return values.
    If you want to keep using method invocations as synchronous calls with
    return values, but you also want to share resources like sockets and
    threads, then you have to use TP-monitoring concepts. You must have a two
    way, asynchronous call with an additional parameter. This means, the client
    does a single, brief call that re-uses an existing thread and immediately
    frees the socket it used. The client passes all required parameters and one
    additional parameter to identify itself. In Forte, this would be a reference
    to an anchored object on the client-partition. Then the client waits
    (possibly blocks). The server completes the request and locates the client
    that sent the request. The server invokes a method on the client, informing
    that the request was handled. The server now also passes all return values.
    The client exits its wait-state and continues.
    In Forte (even if you use other mechanisms to hook into Forte), every call
    still is a separete thread. If you wish to re-use existing threads, this
    must be done using events. So, a client invokes a method asynchronously
    (using "start task") and waits. The server start a new thread and posts an
    event. Each existing thread is either idle in an event loop or busy handling
    a previous event. The new event is added to the queue of all event loops and
    the original thread is terminated (the socket was already freed). One event
    loop of the thread-pool will be the first one to respond to the event, mark
    this somewhere (maybe using mutex) and start handling it. All the others
    will eventually respond to the event as well, but will be able to see that
    the event is already being handled and ignore it.
    This does introduce overhead and it makes your application more complex, but
    it also prevents you running out of resources.
    Now, the real issue is not the amount of calls per second, but a combination
    of calls per second and seconds to complete the call. Using these two
    numbers, you can calculate the amount of tasks the server has to be handling
    simultaneously at any given time (average). Using the above described
    technique you can handle intermittent, large loads, because if there are
    more requests than available resources (threads) at any given time, the
    requests will simply be put in a queue and handled later. However, if the
    over-load continues for a prolonged period of time, the queue will simply
    grow and grow and grow until the partition crashes and all queued items will
    be lost.
    Then it is time for load-balancing. You install several additional servers
    and run a serverprocess on each of these machines. And you use a router that
    distributes calls across the different serverprocesses. Forte has built-in
    mechanisms for that, that work reasonably well. However, if the amount of
    calls per second is so high, that even the short time it takes the router to
    relay the request still is too long, so that the router runs out of
    resources, then you have to use more complex models, for which Forte doesn't
    have any ready-to-use solutions. But neither does CORBA or Java I believe.
    One more thing. If you combine the above described mechanism to free sockets
    as quickly as possible and use Forte loadbalancing, you might solve all your
    problems. Just install 6 overloaded server processes. This results in 6
    processes times 256 threads per process equals 1536 simultaneous tasks. If
    each task is an asynchronous method invocation that immediately frees its
    socket, then you never block you're whole server by using all sockets and
    you're still able to do handle 1536 requests simultaneously.
    Remember, if you have such a large load of calls per second, that all pass
    through the same machine (router) then you'll run into hardware limitations
    and no software solution can fix that. You have to find a mechanism to
    distribute calls across different nodes without using a single router. For
    example, cluster clients and have a single server node per cluster.
    Pascal.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Babu Raj [SMTP:ibcsmartboyyahoo.com]
    Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 3:42 PM
    To: Rottier, Pascal
    Cc: kamranaminyahoo.com
    Subject: RE: (forte-users) RMI Performance Comp. with Forte
    Hi,
    I believe in CORBA, ORB maintains the same
    connection ( Same Socket) for multiple calls, on the
    same Servant object, unless otherwise its ONEWAY call.
    But RMI uses the same strategy as Forte, I'm not sure
    either on this. Thats the reason, i asked the previous
    question.
    Thankx,
    Babu
    --- "Rottier, Pascal" <Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch>
    wrote:
    How are CORBA and RMI different then Forte (one
    socket and one thread per
    call)?
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Babu Raj [SMTP:ibcsmartboyyahoo.com]
    Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 3:18 PM
    To: kamranaminyahoo.com
    Subject: (forte-users) RMI Performance Comp. withForte
    Hi All,
    I know that this topic has been discussed on thelist
    already, but I would like to find out whether the
    current state of Sun's RMI implementation is like
    I imagine it, and I want to compare with our Forte
    Service objects too. Basically, these seem to be
    issues that negatively affect performance,
    1. A thread is created on the server per request,and
    there is no way to change this easily (i.e. reuse
    threads from a pool)
    2. Each call opens a new socket.
    In particular, does it make sense to replace RMIwith
    CORBA for increased performance and scalability?Can a
    PC-based server handle loads of about 1000 remote
    calls per second (considering the overhead imposedby
    RMI/other communication methods only)? or Shall we
    compare Forte against RMI.
    Thankx,
    Babu
    For the archives, go to:
    http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. Tounsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
    For the archives, go to:
    http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To
    unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
    forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

  • Creating Comp With Timecode from Imported Footage

    Hi,
    I know that if i import a MTS file and drop that on the comp icon it will create a new comp with the comp start and end time to match the MTS's embedded timecode.
    However in script how can i do this?
    I can create the comp. I can import the layers. I can tell the duration from the imported layer, but i don't seem to be able to get the start time for the layer, nor set the start time for the comp.
    I'd really appreciate some pointers here, i have thousands of files to script!
    cheers
    Paul

    Reading embeded timecode of video files is not supported via scripting as far as I know.
    You can set a comp start time by using the "displayStartTime" attribute:
    Pg. 54 of the cs6 scripting guide
    CompItem displayStartTime attribute
    app.project.item(index).displayStartTime
    Description:
    The time set as the beginning of the composition, in seconds. This is the equivalent of the Start Timecode or Start Frame setting in the Composition Settings dialog box.
    Type
    Floating-point value in the range [0.0...86339.0] (1 second less than 25 hours); read/write.
    You can also set the starttime of a layer by using the "startTime" attribute:
    Pg. 94
    Layer startTime attribute
    app.project.item(index).layer(index).startTime
    Description:
    The start time of the layer, expressed in composition time (seconds).
    Type
    Floating-point value in the range [-10800.0..10800.0] (minus or plus three hours); read/write

  • Problem with new mobo

    Well I got my new components-
    http://discuss.futuremark.com/forum/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=techmobocpu&Number=5014030&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=0&fpart=1
    And it looks like somethings up with my mobo. When I came to plugging in the tower switches/LEDs, I noticed a lot of the pins were bent inwards, as though something/someone had pushed against them. I bent them back into place as best I could in hope they would still work, managed to get the right plug things on them, but nothing happens when I go to turn it on. I'm not ruling out other hardware- but I know my PSU is fine, as is the little tower plugs (as I tried them on other stuff). Now I'm sure that leaves the mobo only, as surely it would still turn on if the CPU/GPU/ram was not working, jus wouldn't do anything right? Well this isn't even turning on.
    Is there any other way I can tell for certain, or is there something I haven't tried?

    Quote from: fafner on 19-March-05, 05:17:35
    Ok but you will have to email MSI to get a response from them. They do not monitor this forum.
    They don't? Hm, I think I will just go ahead with the RMA then.

  • Recommend a similar product to 'FAN MATE' that works with the MoBOs 12V PS?

    Hi,
    Have just got a K8N SLI Platinum Mobo. It has a very noisey chipset fan and I am trying to decide on which option to solve the problem;
    1)Replace with a quiter fan. (Good choice - requires removing the MoBo)
    2)Replace with a heatsink or HSF. (As Above)
    3)Connect the existing fan up a Zalman 'Fan Mate' to slow down the fan speed, thereby reducuing the dBs.
    At the moment the 'Fan Mate' seems to be the easiest, cheapest and least intrusive solution. Though I see a problem with it,  to quote the Zalman website:
    "...Do not use FAN MATE 1 with a fan having a start up voltage of more than 5V...."
    That statement would seem to rule out the present chipset fan because it is connected to the MoBos 12V PS.
    Can anyone recommend a similar product that will work with the MoBOs 12V PS?

    Hi there, I too have the K8N Platinum SLI with a rather vocal northbridge fan. I have used a Fanmate 2 to slow the little begger down to 5000rpm, at which point I find the noise is OK. My Antec P160 comes with two temperature probes that give readings on the front display, I have squeezed one of these between the fan mount and the heatsink.
    Before using the fanmate the average temp was 39 DegC, now the average temp is 41DegC.
    I had a look at www.quietpc.com, to me it says that if you turn the fanmate right the way down, some fans may not start up as they require more than 5V to start, but I doubt you would need to slow it down that much.
    "Finally, when using the FANMATE 2 at its minimum speed setting, you must ensure that the fan has a minimum startup voltage specification of not more than 5 volts. Otherwise, the Fan Mate will not give a high enough voltage to get the fan started from rest. Before finalising your installation, please test that all FANMATE 2-connected fans successfully start when you first power on the system. If you are using the FANMATE 2 with any of our Ultra-Quiet fans, you do not need to worry about this point because all our Ultra-Quiet fans are guaranteed to start at 5 volts."
    Hope this helps

  • Problems with my Mobo - Hangs at "Testing Real Time Clock" - Whats up?

    Specs:
    MSI K7 Master - MS-6341
    AthlonXP 1800+
    512 PC2100 DDR
    40 gig Maxtor or Seagate 7200rpm, 2mb cache - tried both
    Pine 56x CD Rom
    eVGA GeforceFX 5200
    Generic 420watt PS AND Antec TruePower 430 watt PS - same results
    Alright, I can access the BIOS, etc. but after the first startup screen (with ram, processor type, IDE config, etc.) the screen just has a underscore blinking at the top left...and the error system says Testing Real Time Clock - Ive basically narrowed it down to the IDE connectors since I can unplug the hard drives and it gets past that section and asks for a boot drive - anyone have similar problems? I know he board is old but its for the family and Im stuck right now and I got some anxious members of my family wanting to know whats up with the system - any help will be appreciated...
    It should be noted that I was able to install/run Windows for a couple of days - then I got stability problems which was from the BIOS overclocking my ram past spec but I fixed that and Windows was fine but now I cant boot back up and it cant be virus or bad hard drive because Ive tried more than one - some people who also have this problem can sometimes boot to their OS but its usually not the case...thanks again for the suggestions..
    Things Ive Tried:
    Replaced the CMOS battery
    Cleared CMOS
    Change IDE channels
    Tried just the hard drive
    Removed jumper from hard drive
    Cleared CMOS
    Reseated the ram
    Reseated Video card
    Cleared CMOS
    If someone can find a working solution for this, Ill give them something in return - like some DVDs or cash or something, I really need some help..
    - Adam/vicks

    No problems with the mobo physically - I got it new from a trusted guy on some forums I goto (anandtech) new from an RMA - still sealed...
    I have it running....again....it doesnt like that 1st IDE channel for some reason - Ive restarted/rebooted a few times and nothing has happened so hopefully its fixed but still not cool - Im almost 100% sure it will happen again...

  • Lock agp/pci clock with software

    hi,
    I have a MSI pro2-C (MS-6562 100 rev0.4) and can't lock the agp/pci clock with bios.
    Do you know a software which do that ?
    thx
    winxp sp2
    pentium4 1.7 willamette

    -> LINK to the MB specifications.
    MSI Pro2-C / MS-6562_i845
    With this bios (1.1), I can't lock the agp/pci clock to 66.66/33.33 and when the FSB is about 105, pci extensions are out.
    So, I would like to know if it's possible to lock agp/pci clock with the BIOS 1.2 (or maybe another bios), or if it's possible to do that with software (and if yes, which software)
    CPU is p4 willamette 1.7 (17*100) and I think it would be possible to reach a fsb around 120 (@2040 Mhz) if I can lock agp/pci clock.
    thanks for your help
    and sorry for my english, i'm french 

  • How to disable AGP Fast Write with MSI 875P Neo-FIS2R ??

    How can I disable AGP Fast Write with the MSI 875P Neo-FIS2R ? I can't find an option for this in the BIOS !

    You wont usually find this option in most MB BIOSES , as the only Option that SOME BIOSES Have is the Option to enable, disable SBA (Side Band Addressing) for the AGP Bus....In order for you to Disable or Enable the FW, You Must have the Option in your Vidio Drivers Controll Panel.....If you have a NVIDIA Card, you Must go to  http://www.guru3d.com  And Download the program "NVHardpage" and then Open the Program and you wil have the Choice to Enable these options and they will then appear in your Vidio driver CP >> "Activate "Coolbitts" (this is NVIDIAS Overclocking Utility) Activate "Harware Options", and then Activate "AGP Options" and finally Activate "Performance Options"........If you have a ATI Card then you must Download one of thier "Tweeking Utilities".......I will Post the Direct "Link" for NVHardpage in a Minute, just say yes to the Lic. Agree. and download......Here>> http://download.guru3d.com/nvhardpage/  ...........Sean REILLY875

  • FX5200-TD128 with AGP 1x/2x BX chipset mobo

    hi,
    I really need to know this, I'am at customer he wants me to install the VGA card to him MB. He bought to the MSI FX5200-TD128 card to him ABIT BX133-RAID motherboard. This MB supports only 1x/2x AGP... I don't know, this VGA card is backward compatible with this AGP in this MB? In the sysrequiements they don't write anything about AGP port. In other MSI card, MX440 is specified in the syserquiments the min. AGP port must be 4x..... At FX5200 this is missing.
    Can I put this card to this MB? I don't want fry it...
    please help!
    Thank tou

    It *should* work, but these cards usually get very hot in 3.3v slots so if this a passively cooled card you might want to put a fan over the heatsink.

  • AGP Driver Problem with my ms-6585 and msi-ti4200 128 8x

    hi all !  Hope i'll get an reply cause this is bugging me since i have my board.  I'm having trouble with all the AGP drivers for the sis chipset.  Seems to stuck after the win2000 (sp3) loading.  Just before you enter you password.  the screen just lock up.  I can't do anything besides loading in safe mode.  When i uninstall the driver, everything returns to normal.
    here's my system :
    win2000 sp3
    pIV 2.53
    Mobo is a MSI 648 MAX sis (ms-6585)
    GFX is a msi ti-4200 128mo 8x
    512RAM DDR333
    PSupply is a 300w
    not sure of the bios version, but it's easy to get.  let me know if you need it.

    alathgr,
    Downoad the latest VIA (KT600) chipset Hyperion driver from http://www.viaarena.com/default.aspx?PageID=420&OSID=1&CatID=1070
    Put the ATI card back in. Run the uninstall of the ATI card and run Driver Cleaner.
    Install the VIA chipset driver.
    Install the FX5700 card.
    Install the nvidia VGA driver, its this one http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp_175.16_whql.html

Maybe you are looking for