AIDE (Tripwire equivalent) package for OEL 4

Hello everyone,
Where can I get an AIDE package for our Oracle Enterprise Linux 4? AIDE is the open-source equivalent of Tripwire.
I could compile from source but if there's a package it will easier :)
Thanks!
Jorge

I found aide package in EL5(aide-0.12-7.i386.rpm) and EL5U1(aide-0.13.1-2.0.4.el5.i386.rpm). and did not find it in EL4. :(

Similar Messages

ULN oracle-validated, Note 761566.1 and database packages for OEL 5.5

I purchased the ULN to simiplify installing the packages for an Oracle E-Business installation. I'm assuming the oracle-validated is not for E-Business installation because there were several required packages from note 761566.1 that were not installed The note also has a list of 11.1.0.7 required packages. Not all of these were installed with the oracle-validated update either. Maybe i'm not doing it correctly?
If so, how do you use the oracle-validated to apply all the required packages. What channels do I subscribe to for the oracle-validated to work correctly.
I am on OEL 5.5
I am subscribed to two channels the latest for 5.5 and 5.5 x64 per a previous thread.
Packages listed in note 761566.1 that I'm having trouble with:
There are 3 parts to the package installation section.
1. You have to go to http://oss.oracle.com/projects/compat-oracle/files/Enterprise_Linux to get a couple packages not on the OEL installation disk. Are these also on the ULN update someplace?
•openmotif21-2.1.30-11.EL5.i3861
•xorg-x11-libs-compat-6.8.2-1.EL.33.0.1.i386
2. A list of packages for release 5 and up
There were more than this not updated from oracle-validated from the ULN but these are the trouble ones:
This is on the list of required:
•glibc-2.5-18.i686 (32-bit)
•glibc-2.5-18.x86_64
•glibc-common-2.5-18.x86_64
•glibc-devel-2.5-18.i386 (32-bit)
•glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64
This is what is on the server after ULN update
glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i686)
glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (x86_64)
glibc-common-2.5-49 (x86_64)
glibc-devel-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i386)
glibc-headers-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i386)
Is glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i686) a newer version of •glibc-2.5-18.i686 (32-bit) ? if so, then where do I get the same version that is synonymous with •glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64 ?
If i try to apply •glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64 I get stuck in a loop.
This is what is on the 5.5 linux disk:.
glibc-2.5-49.i686.rpm
glibc-devel-2.5-49.i386.rpm
glibc-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
glibc-common-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
glibc-devel-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
glibc-utils-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
glibc-headers-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
3. Additionally, the following RPMs are required for an 11gR1
I would have thought at least these packages would have installed from the oracle-validated update, but they weren't. Maybe I'm doing it wrong.
The following are listed in the note to be installed: I get stuck in a loop with this one too. What do I do about this?
•elfutils-libelf-devel-0.125-3.el5.x86_64
•elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.125-3.el5.x86_64
What is installed is
elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5 (i386)
elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5 (i386)
# rpm -ivh elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
elfutils-libelf-devel-static-x86_64 = 0.137-3.el5 is needed by elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5.x86_64
# rpm -ivh elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
elfutils-libelf-devel-x86_64 = 0.137-3.el5 is needed by elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5.x86_6
This is what is on the 5.5 disk:
elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm
elfutils-libelf-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm
elfutils-libelf-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm
elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
Edited by: jarymo on Jan 28, 2011 7:29 AM

Now I really need glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64. My installation failed with the following which is what started this quest for what is missing in the first place.
.end std out.
sqlplus: error while loading shared libraries: libclntsh.so.11.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
egrep: /u01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/11.1.0/appsutil/log/VIS_vicr410/adcrdb_VIS.txt: No such file or directory
This failed on the database portion of the installation. ibclntsh.so.11.1 sh
From DOC: 786995.1 Troubleshooting The Relink Errors When Missing RPMs on Linux x86-64
Error :-
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
genclntsh: Failed to link libclntsh.so.11.1
Affected Version :-
11.1 RHEL5(x86-64)
RPM missing :-
glibc-devel (64-bit)
ApplyDatabase_01281418.log
This is on the list of required:
•glibc-2.5-18.i686 (32-bit)
•glibc-2.5-18.x86_64
•glibc-common-2.5-18.x86_64
•glibc-devel-2.5-18.i386 (32-bit)
•glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64
This is what is on the server after ULN update
glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i686)
glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (x86_64)
glibc-common-2.5-49 (x86_64)
glibc-devel-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i386)
glibc-headers-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i386)
Is glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i686) a newer version of •glibc-2.5-18.i686 (32-bit) ? if so, then where do I get the same version that is synonymous with •glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64 so I don't have to remove all the UNL updates and apply what is on the installation disk?

Kernel SMP Devel Package for OEL 4,7

Hi,
Can someone point me the location/url from where I can download the below package :
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-78.0.13.0.1.EL.x86_64.rpm
I am looking for this specfic package for kernel version 2.6.9-78.0.13.0.1.
Thanks and Regards
Anoop

Hi,
Actually I open the http://public-yum.oracle.com/ in IE and went to the location mentioned in :
http://public-yum.oracle.com/public-yum-el4.repo
But could't find it there, actually repository still has old kernel kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-78.0.0.0.1.EL.x86_64.rpm.
But I need the kernel - kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-78.0.13.0.1.EL.x86_64.rpm
Please let me know, if anyone has any idea.
- Anoop

Oracle Linux 6.1 asm packages - oracleasm and oracleasmlib for OEL 6.1 ???

Hello everyone
I am not ULN subscriber, I am trying to learn Oracle ASM/RAC at work.
I am running OEL 6.1 (uname -rm output is: 2.6.32-100.34.1.el6uek.x86_64)
I am looking for two ASM support libraries which are compatible with above Oracle Linux 6.1 X64
Specifically this article refers to 2 packages I need for ASM support:
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/11g/OracleDB11gR2RACInstallationOnOEL5UsingVirtualBox.php
•oracleasmlib-2.0.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm -- I need this one
•oracleasm-support-2.1.3-1.el5.x86_64.rpm -- this package is now already installed on OEL 6.1 so I dont need this one for OEL 6.1
•oracleasm-2.6.18-164.el5-2.0.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm -- I need this one
Can anyone direct me to a download link for the above two packages? Even if its from RHEL6.1 as long as it works?
Or does it mean that I must pay Oracle in order to be able to get these packages in order to learn ASM at home ??
Why would Oracle allow us to use their RDBMS/RAC/ASM/Linux software at home learning for free and not supply the above two packages??
thanks

user6029797 wrote:
•oracleasmlib-2.0.4-1.el5.x86_64.rpm -- I need this oneThis requires Oracle Linux support, as it is not GPL software and is only available to subscribers.
•oracleasm-2.6.18-164.el5-2.0.5-1.el5.x86_64.rpm -- I need this oneNo, you don't. This is built into the kernel for OL6U1.
Or does it mean that I must pay Oracle in order to be able to get these packages in order to learn ASM at home ??
Why would Oracle allow us to use their RDBMS/RAC/ASM/Linux software at home learning for free and not supply the above two packages??If you want to use ASM for free, install Oracle Linux 5 Update 7 and download the RHEL5 oracleasmlib package from here:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/linux/downloads/rhel5-084877.html
Keep in mind that Database is NOT certified on Oracle Linux 6 anyway, so it is challenging to install. The very article you link to uses Oracle Linux 5. It also links to these very same RPMs. If you follow the article more carefully, you won't have any issues.

Glibc error when installing OEL 5.8 packages for 10g install

Hi, I have the following errors occurring when installing the pre-requisite packages for a 10g install. I'm following the instructions on
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/10g/OracleDB10gR2InstallationOnRHEL5.php
file /usr/lib/gconv/libISOIR165.so from install of glibc-2.5-81.i386 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.5-81.i686
file /usr/lib/gconv/libJIS.so from install of glibc-2.5-81.i386 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.5-81.i686
file /usr/lib/gconv/libJISX0213.so from install of glibc-2.5-81.i386 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.5-81.i686
file /usr/lib/gconv/libKSC.so from install of glibc-2.5-81.i386 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.5-81.i686
file /usr/libexec/getconf/POSIX_V6_ILP32_OFF32 from install of glibc-2.5-81.i386 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.5-81.i686
file /usr/libexec/getconf/POSIX_V6_ILP32_OFFBIG from install of glibc-2.5-81.i386 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.5-81.i686
file /usr/sbin/iconvconfig from install of glibc-2.5-81.i386 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.5-81.i686
[root@oravm1 Server]# rpm -Uvh glibc-2.5-81.i86.rpm
I'm not sure what to do as the 10g install complains that the glibc package is not installed as a requirement for the db software install.

yum list glibcLoaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
This system is not registered with ULN.
ULN support will be disabled.
Installed Packages
glibc.i686 2.5-81.el5_8.1 installed
Available Packages
glibc.i386 2.5-81.el5_8.1 el5_latest
Should I really have the i686 version installed?
The 5.8 install includes the i686 version and the i386 version. Perhaps only the i386 version should have been installed. Am I right? If so should I remove the i686 version and how?
yum install glibcLoaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
This system is not registered with ULN.
ULN support will be disabled.
Setting up Install Process
Package glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i686 already installed and latest version
Nothing to do
[root@oravm1 ~]#
Also.....
The install warned that the swap was not lareg enough, I recall something like 2.7GB when I have actually made it 2GB.
And the other things was ....
Checking for shmmax=536870912; found shmmax=33554432
The instructions I followed say nothing of setting this so high.
Edited by: ImiDataMan on Apr 11, 2012 4:49 PM

Database package for handling SQL queries using JDBC/ODBC bridge

I perform a package using J2ME which can stores the contact.It consisting of the fascilities of the editing,Inserting, Deleting,Updating records
i have write import statements as
import javax.microedition.midlet*;
import javax.microedition.lcdui.*;
but when i write import java.sql.* error message shown AS this package does not exist.
So for J2ME using J2ME wireless toolkit 2.5 cldc which package i want to import to implement the sql statements i implement the Database using the text Files.
Requirement is that all SQL statements are implemented.also Which other equivalent packages are there for handling the databases in J2ME.
Please tell me all the package & Answer of the above problem.

Hey
I was told that I can (through Java code) read all the registered DSNs and that way basically modify my application to populate it with a list of databases in the system and then when the user clicks on a database, the program would function as before...i.e. read the list of tables with it..yadda yadda yadda
Can anyone guide me on how to do that? read a list of DSNs in the system etc

How to check the dependency of Timesten Application version 11.2.1 for OEL 6U4

How to check the dependency of Timesten Application version 11.2.1 for OEL 6U4

Hi Chris,
THank for your reply.. My requirement is I am planning to upgrade my Server OS from OEL 5U8/5U3 servers to OEL 6U4. And we are using timesten application 11.2.1 version as of now. So wanted to check if the same version of TImesten can we install them on OEL 6U4 . if we can install it successfully what are the dependent RPM packages we need to consider for installing the timesten application and will there be any issues using the application? .
Is timesten 11.2.2 is the officially supported and stable version on OEL6U4?
And also can you suggest me if I want to check other applications dependency like rhino-2.3 and postgres 8.1.23 version how I need to check if this applications versions are certified to run on OEL 6U4.
IT would be great help if you can suggest me on this.
Naveen

Upgraded from LabVIEW 8 to 2013 and now VI asks to find the installation package for Run-Time Engine 7.0

I recently installed LabVIEW 2013 on a computer (running Windows XP 32-bit). The machine also has LabVIEW 8 installed, which is what I was using prior to upgrading. I opened a VI that was created in LV8 and then saved it and all its subVIs in LV2013. Now when I open the VI in LV2013 and try to run it, a window pops up asking me to find the "lvruntimeeng.msi" installation package for LabVIEW Run-Time Engine 7.0. If I cancel that dialog box and the subsequent message stating that the installion files were not found, the VI appears (at least from intial inspection) to run normally.
I closed LabVIEW, downloaded Run-Time Engine 7.0 from the NI website, and tried to install it, but I received a message saying that it is already installed (as I had suspected). How can I determine what part of the VI and/or its subVIs is trying to make use of Run-Time Engine 7.0? Alternatively, how can I get LabVIEW to instead use the Run-Time Engine 2013 that was installed when I upgraded to LabVIEW 2013?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Bob_Schor wrote:
Are you running your VI from a Project? If so, you can look at Dependencies and get an idea what "dependent" VIs you might have. There may be "something old" in your LabVIEW 8 code that has been superceded in 2013, but still "hangs around" -- if you can identify it, you can probably replace it with its "more modern" equivalent.
If you do not have the VI in a Project, you can simply open LabVIEW, create a new blank project, and add your top level VI to it. If all of your relevant VIs are in a single folder, add the entire folder. Now look in Dependencies.
BS
Yes I am running the VI from within a LV Project. After some more searching in the NI Knowledgebase I was able to fix the problem by using the following procedure:
1. Use the Measurement and Automation Explorer to uninstall Run-Time Engine 7.0
2. Restart the PC
3. Open the project, close the project choosing to "save all"
4. Restart the PC
5. Re-install Run-Time Engine 7.0 using a file downloaded from ni.com
6. Restart the PC
7. Open the project, close the project choosing to "save all"
8. Open the project and run the VI. No more messages about LabVIEW trying to find Run-Time Engine 7.0.

SAR for oel

Hi all,
I run the command "sar" and "mpstat" for oel but its command not found.
What is the counterpart of these commands please....
Thanks

KinsaKaUy? wrote:
I run the command "sar" and "mpstat" for oel but its command not found.Both sar and mpstat can be found in the sysstat package, so try this to install the package on Oracle Linux 5:
# up2date -u sysstat This requires your server to be registered with ULN. If you do not have a ULN subscription, follow the instructions at http://public-yum.oracle.com to configure yum first. Once you've configured yum, you can use:
# yum install sysstat This last command is also used for Oracle Linux 6 registered to ULN (as we use yum for ULN from OL6).

Creation of Add-on package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One Client

Please help me creating package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One. If Add-on executable is compiled with x86 option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 32 bit SAP Business one and if Add-on executable is compiled with Any CPU option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 64 bit SAP Business one. Problems are mentioned as below
1. My Add-on uses MS ACCESS connection and the connection is read using Jet OLEDB 4.0 provider. It works fine for x86 compile mode but not when compile mode is Any CPU. I searched for the issue on Google and found a solution to change MS ACCESS connection provider to ACE.OLEDB.12.0 but again ACE provider is installed according to the Office version i.e. 32 bit or 64 bit office suite. If I install 32 bit ACE provider then Add-on executable compiled with x86 version is working fine but with Any CPU option throws error as provider is not registered on current machine.
2. Secodly, our license validation activex dll is build using vb 6.0 and therefore when Add-on executable is compiled using Any CPU option, Add-on EXE cannot read from license dll. Any suggestion, how the activeX dll can be compiled whose component can be created from for X86 compiled exe and any cpu compiled exe.
Please help because we are stuck in this issue and cannot move forward.
Thanks.

Hi Alejandro,
That is one solution but did your add on used ms access connection? if you used Jet oledb to connection string or ace oledb connection string? what if 32 bit office is installed and what if 64 office is installed? how did you found the office version in install script? after determining the office version how did you installed Microsoft redistributable for ace oledb (32 bit or 64 bi )?
I am sorry that I asked many questions but these are the problems where I am stuck with the addon installer?
Thanks

Adobe Creative Cloud Packager for macintosh fails

Adobe Creative Cloud Packager for macintosh fails.
The error log says "[ERROR] AdobePackageBuilder - AdobePackageBuilder : SendPacket returned error : -1".
I tried 4-5 times.
Everything is downloaded (took about 14 Gb).
I now have only 12Gb free space on my disk. Can that be the reason (will the packager need to make a copy of the downloaded stuff?).
When I am done, how do I reclaim the space eaten by the packager?
Seems like it is caching it at ~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CCP, but will I manually have to delete that cache?
I cannot find a menu entrance for doing so.
Would be nice if the packager could use a mounted network disk as destination, but it seems not to discover these.
/Peter Andersen

Wanted to join in and say this has been happening to me too. I wiped every adobe file I could find, and used the cleaner too. Started over from scratch in a brand new user account.
It's been about 7 days and I cannot get CCP to actually build a package. I've gotten a variety of messages but everything single time something fails. The new thing is that it says it fails on individual applications. So I disable them, and the error jumps to a new app. I can see that the .dmg's are fine and intact in ~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CCP/
Given the amount of time this has cost me I really wish I had purchased CS6 Master Collection for every workstation. From my perspective, Creative Cloud has been nothing more then a giant waste of time and effort. It's genuinely bad product from an IT management perspective. Why push off the job of building and installer onto the customer? I should just be able to download the full Master Collection dmg, and then turn on and off the apps I want. Instead I am stuck with a workstation down, and everyone using CC trials to work.

Acrobat XI Pro Install via CCP Packager for Enterprise unuseable - tips for the unitiated

Well, after at least six weeks of trying to script and package Acrobat XI via the CCP packager for enterprise (Windows 7 X64) I have learnt many home truths which I thought I would share with the unitiated. This process, from the point of view of an IT admin who has to mass deploy this application to 680 PC's as part of an updated SOE has been the most painful scripting process I have ever found of any package (we successfully deploy Office, and Autodesk apps!). Not only that, but our entire State technical colleges have all purchased the same version. This will be affecting IT staff across a huge area, perhaps worldwide. Below are some some facts relating to this that I will share so others do not have to trawl the minefiled of dead-ends and confusion that is Adobe forums/official documentation. Apologies for not finding direct links to all of the below just yet but I've run out of time as we now have MANUALLY install Acrobat XI on all of these machines. When I get time I will post some of the links:
Facts:
Acrobat XI and Lightroom are NOT "CC" packages. Therefore they rely on a spearate serial numbers to install standalone without another major Adobe product (eg Photoshop) to be installed and then run first. Otherwise they will run in trial mode. If your organistaion is wanting to install these products I highly recommend seeing if Adobe can provide you with these.
Without the use of serial number for Acrobat XI this almost renders the Customisation Wizard effectively useless, none of the silent install switch will work with "Offline Exception"
Yes, one Adobe employee notes that you must install a major package before Acrobat but as the aoplogies for not fixing this were posted last August, we are still in the quandry of not having any useable fix except for the ridiculous "Exceptions" file and Exceptions installer.
If you run the Build and/or execeptions msi's it installs Acrobat twice, gold Adobe, gold.
http://forums.adobe.com/message/6039529#6039529 - look at this for a working script for Photoshop etc, it's great.Thanks to http://forums.adobe.com/people/PetriRiihikallio for posting this. However, alas, it cannot silently install Acrobat correctly (thus far).
It appears that the msi builder for CCP for enterprise is fatally flawed. I have never had as much problem with installing msi's - ever. For example, I have had to re-package the msi multiples times and many times simply running the msi will fail.
The idea that all major installs have to install the 32 bit version AND the 64 bit version is riduclous, enough said.
http://blogs.adobe.com/acrolaw/2013/02/acrobat-xi-deployment-guide-for-large-firms/ this guide may be useful for people who have been given a separate serial number.
http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/known-issues-acrobat-xi-reader.html another useful link
I think for the time being I have now wasted enough time trying to tear my hair out with this. I will be waiting for Adobe to announce Acrobat and Lightroom CC. this will enable the correct deployment of a single app without having the bloat my SOE with unnecessary applications that most staff rarely use. Ahhh, I love a good manual install via VNC/RDP, don't you?

Hi Waltpenner and others, yes it can be very confusing and writing script after script got me even more confused.
Now, the story continues, after 6+ hours on the phone with Adobe Support...
When you install Adobe Acrobat XI it asks you to install the C++ Redistributable package and this is where the msi will STOP INSTALLING. even though the MSI says "complete"
Now you think to yourself, OK, I'll write a script to install this msi package no problems, solved.
Nope, the msi for Acrobat Pro XI will Still Halt even if you write this into the script along with halt no err or something similar in your code.
So what do you do?
When you create your msi in Cloud Packager, even though this feels completely against your better judgement tick the box under conflicting Process entitled "Ignore Conflicts and Continue installations" This will (finally) allow you to run the msi. Please see the wonderful deployment script above, which you may still need to edit to your needs (I did) - which I post once it's working perfectly.
You could then install the C++ redist from Microsoft at a later date ----> On that note however (thanks Microsoft for this gem) the Visual C++ redist is an msi for download, but it's actually a zip file calling an exe inside it. I suggest using the App Deploy Repackager to help you change registry entries if you need to install this, but choose your favourite tool (and no I'm not talking about that work colleague you don't like
Note: You will need to install this for certain features of Acro Pro XI to function, most of which relates to sever functions of Acrobat. I will post the exact reasons when I find them. Under pressure to get this deployed, I have not deployed this pckage as yet. Also, I'm unsure how Visual C++ will affect other major apps across my enterprise just yet.
Things to still consider
Acrobat still installs twice in the program directory (1.7GB nd 1.8GB respectively)
As all of the other CC packages are quite easy to install, Adobe needs to provide better service to it's enterprise customers by creating a proper version of Acrobat and Lightroom which is Acrobat CC and Lightroom CC, not version numbers tacked onto their new Cloud Service.
As for the above point I would still recommend creating the smallest msi packages you can, as large msi's that install a number of Apps (eg all of the web/image editing apps) take forever and quite often exhibit install errors
The amount of time I've spent on this is ridiculous, and we've had to package everything from Office to Autocad.
The amount of bandwidth I've chewed up is excessive, with package re-creation (download) of all the products probably about 100GB - however the ability to edit these packages with updates with the CCP is a good step forward.
Using the CCP through a proxy is horrendous, and complicated with the amount of exception through the servers you have to prvide (even then it rarely works).
The MSI packager still needs quite alot of work. As Petri states why he had to write a script like this when Adobe could have done the same thing is beyond him.
Adobe needs to trawl it's forum posts and take out the many false leads and dead ends provided by it's experts.
When I Think of anything else, or wite more scipts I'll let you all know.
Cheers,

I am trying to update ITunes from 10.4 to 10.5 I have tried from both the program, and from a download on Apple's website. Regardless, I get the following error messages: (1) Installation package for iTunes cannot be found. Try installing to find the inst

I am trying to update ITunes from 10.4 to 10.5 I have tried from both the program, and from a download on Apple's website. Regardless, I get the following error messages: (1) Installation package for iTunes cannot be found. Try installing to find the installation package 'iTunes.msi' in a folder from which you can install iTunes. I can't find this folder. I have tried to completely unistall iTunes through the Control Panel, but it wouldn't let me: I tried going directly to the files themselves, but cannot uninstall. Any help would be greatly appreciated. System OS: Win XP SP 3.

Set the permissions for Everyone in the folder in which CCPackager created, to "Read/Write" enabled. This is strange since there is only an administrator account on the Mac (and that account already has read/write), but it seems to resolve the issue.

When i try to download the newest version of itunes it says "the feature you are trying to use is on a network resource that is unavailable" and then it gives me an alternate path to a folder containing the installation package for itunes64.mis, help

when i try to download the newest version of itunes it says "the feature you are trying to use is on a network resource that is unavailable" and then it gives me an alternate path to a folder containing the installation package for itunes64.mis, help

(1) Download the Windows Installer CleanUp utility installer file (msicuu2.exe) from the following Major Geeks page (use one of the links under the "DOWNLOAD LOCATIONS" thingy on the Major Geeks page):
http://majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4459
(2) Doubleclick the msicuu2.exe file and follow the prompts to install the Windows Installer CleanUp utility. (If you're on a Windows Vista or Windows 7 system and you get a Code 800A0046 error message when doubleclicking the msicuu2.exe file, try instead right-clicking on the msicuu2.exe file and selecting "Run as administrator".)
(3) In your Start menu click All Programs and then click Windows Install Clean Up. The Windows Installer CleanUp utility window appears, listing software that is currently installed on your computer.
(4) In the list of programs that appears in CleanUp, select any iTunes entries and click "Remove", as per the following screenshot:
(5) Quit out of CleanUp, restart the PC and try another iTunes install. Does it go through properly this time?

How to create a dynamic SSIS package for multiple flat file destinations

Hi,
I have to create a ssis package which has single data flow task and inside that I have 23 source (sql- select * from - statements)- destination (flat files, 23 distinct) connection.
Now for each product I have to create separate SSIS package (i.e. if prod=abc then these read select * from abc_tables and 23 abc_ txt files)
I want to do it dynamically, means only single package and inside that variables will take select * values for each source-dest connection (so i believe 23 variables) and same for destination flat files.
Let me know. :)
ANK HIT - if reply helps, please mark it as ANSWER or helpful post

Sorry It seems you're contradicting yourself. you say I know my source and dest structure and the you're
asking all I want is to have a dynamic structure
what does that mean?
and reading your next sentence
I want to run a package for 5 products, instead of creating 5 ssis packages with 23 source- dest connection, I would
like to have one with only 23 source- dest connections
What I feel is what you're looking for is to have a looping structure to loop through each of the 5
products.
In that case what you could do is this
1. Create a object variable in SSIS
2. Use a Execute SQL Task to populate the variable with all available products (I think you'll have a master table for that). Set ResultSet property to Full ResultSet and then in ResultSet tab map Object variable to 0 th index
3. use a ForEachLoop container with ADO .NET recordset enumerator and map to object variable. Create a variable of datatype same as that of Product identifier field to get individual values out
4. Inside loop create your data flow task with 23 source destination connection. In the query part use a parameter for product field and map it to the variable containing product value to get only data for the product.
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

AIDE (Tripwire equivalent) package for OEL 4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for