Airdisk - SLOW read speed, but FAST write speed with Leopard 10.5.1?

I've been complaining for a while about my random problems with reading files from airdisk. My solution has always been to relaunch finder and re-mount the airdisk when it slows down.
I just noticed the speed cut down to and when looking at the activity monitor, it's fluctuating up and down and never seems to go past 1.5 to 2 MB/s.
HOWEVER, what I did just notice is that my write speed is consistently 3-4 MB/s with no fluctuation at all. Interference is not an issue, as I'm on N-only mode and in 5GHZ.
Is there anything I can do aside from waiting until 10.5.2? This does this issue in every AEBSn firmware. Thanks.

I experience the same problem (slow read: 2,8 MB/s, fast write: 6,3 MB/s) with my airdisk over a LAN-connection with 10.5.2. I atteched the USB-drive directly to my iMac and then it's the other way around: fast write, slow read (although considerably higher and normal throughtputs so drive is OK).
Anyone having some suggestions? The airdisk is formatted as HFS+ (GUID) with journalling on, Airport firmware 7.3.1 and the most recent updates installed.
Message was edited by: jnmen

Similar Messages

  • Airdisk: slow read, fast write?

    I'm evaluating the option to use the Airdisk as an alternative for my Linux fileserver. For this I created 2 partitions (Airdisk1 and Airdisk2, both Mac OS Extended Journalled GUID) on a USB-drive using the disk utility. Then I attached this drive to my AEBS.
    I performed my tests by copying a 1 GB file to/from my iMac from/to the Airdisk1 using a 100Mb Ethernet network (so not wireless):
    Write the file to Airdisk1: 6.3 MB/s (not (Mb/s)
    Read the file from Airdisk1: 2.8 MB/s (not Mb/s)
    The strange thing is that the read-speads are considerably lower than the write speeds. Also, while the write-speed is consistent during the copy, the read-speed is very mixed and sometimes it even stops for a split-second. Can anybody explain this to me how this is possible? When attaching the USB-drive directly to the iMac, both read and write are equal and at a very high level (so no problem with the iMac-disc).
    Also, are these speeds more or less the maximum I can expect?
    Is GUID the right choice or is it better to use APM (Apple Partition Map)?
    The AEBS is using firmware 7.3.1 and all the latest software updates are done.
    Thanks for any reponse.
    Message was edited by: jnmen
    Message was edited by: jnmen

    Thanks for your support.
    I looked at the post you're referring to and disabling journaling only improved the write-speed. But the write-speed is not what the problem is; it is the read-speed. And disabling journaling has no influence on reading a drive (as far as I know).
    Also, disabling journaling can give data integrity-problems on the HD in case of sudden disconnects or power-down. Or am I wrong?

  • Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces Simple RAID 0 VERY SLOW reads, but fast writes with LSI 9207-8e SAS JBOD HBA Controller

    Has anyone else seen Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces with a Simple RAID 0 (also happens with Mirrored RAID 1 and Parity RAID 5) virtual disk exhibiting extremely slow read speed of 5Mb/sec, yet write performance is normal at 650Mb/sec in RAID 0?
    Windows Server 2012 Standard
    Intel i7 CPU and Motherboard
    LSI 9207-8e 6Gb SAS JBOD Controller with latest firmware/BIOS and Windows driver.
    (4) Hitachi 4TB 6Gb SATA Enterprise Hard Disk Drives HUS724040ALE640
    (4) Hitachi 4TB 6Gb SATA Desktop Hard Disk Drives HDS724040ALE640
    Hitachi drives are directly connected to LSI 9207-8e using a 2-meter SAS SFF-8088 to eSATA cable to six-inch eSATA/SATA adapter.
    The Enterprise drives are on LSI's compatibility list.  The Desktop drives are not, but regardless, both drive models are affected by the problem.
    Interestingly, this entire configuration but with two SIIG eSATA 2-Port adapters instead of the LSI 9207-8e, works perfectly with both reads and writes at 670Mb/sec.
    I thought SAS was going to be a sure bet for expanding beyond the capacity of port limited eSATA adapters, but after a week of frustration and spending over $5,000.00 on drives, controllers and cabling, it's time to ask for help!
    Any similar experiences or solutions?

    Has anyone else seen Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces with a Simple RAID 0 (also happens with Mirrored RAID 1 and Parity RAID 5) virtual disk exhibiting extremely slow read speed of 5Mb/sec, yet write performance is normal at 650Mb/sec in RAID 0?
    Windows Server 2012 Standard
    Intel i7 CPU and Motherboard
    LSI 9207-8e 6Gb SAS JBOD Controller with latest firmware/BIOS and Windows driver.
    (4) Hitachi 4TB 6Gb SATA Enterprise Hard Disk Drives HUS724040ALE640
    (4) Hitachi 4TB 6Gb SATA Desktop Hard Disk Drives HDS724040ALE640
    Hitachi drives are directly connected to LSI 9207-8e using a 2-meter SAS SFF-8088 to eSATA cable to six-inch eSATA/SATA adapter.
    The Enterprise drives are on LSI's compatibility list.  The Desktop drives are not, but regardless, both drive models are affected by the problem.
    Interestingly, this entire configuration but with two SIIG eSATA 2-Port adapters instead of the LSI 9207-8e, works perfectly with both reads and writes at 670Mb/sec.
    I thought SAS was going to be a sure bet for expanding beyond the capacity of port limited eSATA adapters, but after a week of frustration and spending over $5,000.00 on drives, controllers and cabling, it's time to ask for help!
    Any similar experiences or solutions?
    1) Yes, being slow either on reads or on writes is a quite common situation for storage spaces. See references (with some of the solutions I hope):
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverfiles/thread/a58f8fce-de45-4032-a3ef-f825ee39b96e/
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2012/10/10/windows-server-2012-storage-spaces-is-it-for-you-could-be.aspx
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserver8gen/thread/64aff15f-2e34-40c6-a873-2e0da5a355d2/
    and this one is my favorite putting a lot of light on the issue:
    http://helgeklein.com/blog/2012/03/windows-8-storage-spaces-bugs-and-design-flaws/
    2) Issues with SATA-to-SAS hardware is also very common. See:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverClustering/thread/5d4f68b7-5fc4-4a3c-8232-a2a68bf3e6d2
    StarWind iSCSI SAN & NAS

  • Time Machine backup to Drobo seems slow. What is normal write speed?

    I just got a Drobo with Firewire 800. I'm using it exclusively for Time Machine backups. The write speed to the Drobo appears to be about 3 to 4 mb/s. Is that normal? Anyone getting the same or similar speed? I used to backup to a LaCie drive (which, of course, died) and it was way faster.
    Message was edited by: Hey Cricket
    Message was edited by: Hey Cricket

    Chr!x wrote:
    * iMac hard drive size occuped : 160 Go (658.000 files)
    * Backup made with CCC in 4 hours.
    * First Time Machine backup still in progress (actually, 90 Go in 9hours...)
    That's much too slow. Try the things in #D2 of the Time Machine - Troubleshooting *User Tip,* also at the top of this forum.
    I don't understand with CCC is so fast comparing Time Machine initial backup. I hope incremental TM backup faster...
    Some of the difference is that CCC is most likely doing a "block copy;" whatever's in each block on the internal is copied to the external; no checking, no indexing, etc. It assumes everything is in order.
    Time Machine is making all the directory entries, hard links, etc., file by file, and indexing each file. Overall, it shouldn't take much longer than CCC (I use both), so one or more of the things in #D2 should greatly reduce the TM backup time.

  • How to configure secondary domain controller read only, but prevent write in replication?

    Hi all,
    I have one primary Domain controller (dc1.abc.local) at site, production mode.
    I am trying to do some Proof of Concept with the firewall appliance, which the user datastore need extract and bind to AD.
    I am thinking setup another new computer and promote it domain controller (new.abc.local), same domain, same forest. But this only can read the configuration replicate from primary Domain controller (dc1.abc.local) but cannot write.
    Firewall will use the ID agent to pull the log event from the DC and do the IP mapping table (User - IP).
    What is the setting i need to on both domain controller?
    p.s: one criteria i cannot set this server role as RODC.
    p,s: platform is window servers 2008 R2
    Thank

    Not very easy telling you how to extract info, not sure what it is you need and your skill level scripting.
    There is a Microsoft Script Center that has scripts available
    http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/site/search?f%5B0%5D.Type=RootCategory&f%5B0%5D.Value=activedirectory&f%5B0%5D.Text=Active%20Directory
    Also there is a scripting forum, where you could ask for help in crafting your script
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home?category=windowsserver#forum=winserverpowershell&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc&content=Search
    Paul Bergson
    MVP - Directory Services
    MCITP: Enterprise Administrator
    MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security, BS CSci
    2012, 2008, Vista, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
    Twitter @pbbergs http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/paulbergson
    Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup.
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

  • Satellite P500/01R reads data but cannot write data files to CD

    I recently bought a Satellite P500/01R laptop. I am able to read a data CD but cannot write data files to CD. The CD is read/write.
    Any ideas?

    Hi
    Did you try different burning software?
    Im using the Nero and in my opinion one of the best burning applications.
    There I can choose between CD, DVD, DL or Blueray (only possible if CD/DVD drive supports this too.)
    Did you also check different CDs from different manufacturers?
    You should do this since not all disks are 100% compatible.
    I had many issues with different CD or DVD in most cases it was an compatibility issue I tested TDK and these kind of disk is compatible with my CD/DVD drive
    Im using the R standard.

  • Adobe Reader XI 11 slow in browser but fast in Reader..

    We are required to use IE 8, within IE we have an intranet which references PDF files.
    If I open the PDF file from the network \\fqdn\share\xyz.pdf it works and is very fast (in PDF Viewer)
    If I open the same pdf, from the same path inside of IE 8, it opens but then freezes for 6-25 sec.
    I cant change browsers, I cant change versions or readers.
    Any idea how to resolve?
    My first thought was to have it open in the reader vs the browser, but the checkmark to disable opening in browser does not exist.  Disabling the plugin also did not work.
    Environment
    Server 2003 R2
    IE 8
    Reader 11

    Fixed my own issue.
    Do the following steps to disable Adobe Reader browser plug-in in IE8:
    1. Launch IE8
    2. Click on Tools menu > Manage Add-ons
    3. Select the "Toolbars and Extensions" under "Add-on Types"
    4. Select the "Run without permission" from the drop-down menu under "Show"
    5. Select the "Adobe PDF Reader"
    6. Click on the "Disable" button
    7. Click on "Close" button to dismiss the "View and Manage your Internet Explorer add-ons"
    Fixed my issue.

  • Help needed:MBP net connection slow on OSX but fast on Vista...

    Ok..I've searched these forums for a while, seen lots of posts taking about people having problems with their airport card, routers and the like..but I haven't seen anyone having quite the same problem as me. My 17" 2.33Ghz C2D is linked to my 1Mb ADSL internet connection via an Aztech DSL600EW modem router.The problem is that the connection speed is really slow when I'm running the machine on OSX. I know it's an OSX thing cos the same machine,connected to the same router and running Windows Vista via Bootcamp will connect to the net ALOT faster. For example, if I'm viewing videos on youtube with OSX, I have to wait every few seconds for the video to buffer, but on Vista, the buffering is way ahead of the video. Another example would be downloading files...say from rapidshare. The typical download speed I get on OSX would be around 5-10Kbps, but with Vista, I get at least 25Kbps.
    I'm quite new to OSX, and still trying to learn my way around the operating system. It seems such a pity for a really great machine with a really great operating system to be let down by slow internet connection. I hope someone out there will be able to help me sort this out. Thanks in advance.

    Great, happy that it "seems to speed up things ..." Why not run the SpeedTest and "know?"
    I use IPNetTuner ($30, free 21 day trial).
    http://www.sustworks.com/site/prodiptxoverview.html
    "*Why is it Sometimes Necessary To Tune TCP/IP*?
    TCP/IP is not controlled by any manufacturer and is designed to work on almost any kind of underlying network with widely varying characteristics.
    To meet this challenge, the protocol designers made TCP adaptive. TCP is self monitoring and optimizes its own behavior to match the network environment.
    *Why can't somebody just write a utility that analyzes my network and automatically selects the optimum settings?* Such a tool would be both useful and popular. The answer is they already have, it's called TCP/IP, but sometimes it needs a little help.
    In most cases, TCP works remarkably well all by itself. Tuning is needed in those cases where TCP doesn't quite get it right because the the network behavior is outside the expected range. Typical problems include:
    Asymmetric connections that are much faster downstream than upstream.
    High performance connections with relatively long latency ..."

  • Why is siri slow an 4g but fast on wifi

    Hi, I have a 4s I need to now why is siri not fast on 4g but great on wifi, if there is a soultion please help me, thanks.

    Well, Wi-Fi speeds are generally going to be faster than any of the "4G" networks that the iPhone can currently connect to. I use quotes, because some would debate calling HSPA+ a 4G network, due to its relatively slower speeds.
    So, Faster Data = Faster Siri == Wi-Fi > "4G"

  • Internet slow on mac but fast on windows

    Hello,
    I recently bought this mac book pro...from Amazon last week.
    It has the Lion OS.
    I have  a Belkin N Wireless router at home and comcast Internet.
    I have a couple of windows lapstops at home (Lenovo) and now have this new Mac.
    The internet on the mac seems to be teribbly slow compared to the Windows PC ?
    I enter the url and then the blue background progress bar gets stuck at around maybe 10 to 20% and then not forward movement ?
    speedtest.net told me that I have to update my flash playwer  (SW something)...which I did and then
    speedtest.net gives me 25+_ mbps speed results but browsing mostly is extrmely painful....
    after this the internet also seems to work ok, so was it the flash ? (not sure why that would be need for all sites or atleast most of the sites?)
    I had instaled this flash last week also and then today when I updated my MAC with the apple updates...looks like it lost it again ?
    not sure if the internet will be slow again tomorrow.... -:(
    Any ideas please ?
    Also, every time I have boot the machine or bring it back from sleep I have to go to network diagnostics and get the internet back ?
    no clue what is going on....
    Any thoughts would be much appreciated !!
    Regards,
    Naresh

    The information you're giving me is ambiguous, so I can't be sure that I'm giving you the right information either. However, it seems at least possible that there was an improvement when you logged in as guest, and no improvement when you booted in safe mode and logged in as yourself. I'll assume that's the case.
    Back up all data if you haven’t already done so. Before proceeding, you must be sure you can restore your system to the state it’s in now. If you skip this step, no one but you will be responsible for the consequences.
    Quit Safari if it’s running.
    Step 1
    Select /Applications/Safari in the Finder and open the Info window. There’s a checkbox in that window labeled “Open in 32-bit mode.” If that box is checked, uncheck it. Close the window.
    Hold down the option key and select Go > Library from the Finder menu bar (Lion) or open the Library subfolder of your home folder (pre-Lion). Delete the following items from the Library folder (some may not exist):
    Caches/com.apple.Safari
    Caches/Metadata/Safari
    Saved Application State/com.apple.Safari.savedState
    Leave the Finder window open. Try Safari again.
    Step 2
    If it still doesn’t work right, quit, go back to the Finder, and move the following file to the Desktop:
    Safari/Bookmarks.plist
    Then delete the following items (some may not exist):
    Cookies/Cookies.binarycookies
    Cookies/Cookies.plist
    Preferences/com.apple.Safari.LSSharedFileList.plist
    Preferences/com.apple.Safari.plist
    Preferences/com.apple.Safari.RSS.plist
    PubSub/Database
    Safari
    Try again. This time Safari should perform normally, but your settings will be lost. Select File > Import Bookmarks from the Safari menu bar. Import from the bookmarks file you moved to the Desktop. Recreate the rest of your Safari settings. You can then delete the old bookmarks file.
    Note: This step will remove your Safari Extensions, if any, and their settings. If you choose to restore them, do so one at a time, testing after each to make sure you haven’t restored the problem.
    If you don’t like the results of step 2, you can undo it completely by quitting Safari and restoring the items you deleted in that step from your backup, overwriting any that were created in their place. You don’t need to restore the files you deleted in step 1.

  • Why is Firefox slow on Wireless but fast on Wired?

    I have an HP Laptop 6730b which was given to me from my company. When I am at work, and connected to our LAN by an Ethernet Cable, Firefox runs perfectly fine and starts up super fast.
    Then when I come home and turn on the Wireless on the laptop, Firefox takes like 20 seconds to startup and 20 seconds on every click. Whether clicking on a link of the same website or clicking on a favorite in my favorite tab, it takes 20 seconds to "Think" first then it loads quickly. This "thinking" part is what's killing me and it ONLY HAPPENS ON WIRELESS!!!

    Actually, here is exactly my problem: I bring my work laptop home with me. I connect to my wireless at home and my internet works just fine. Through Internet Explorer 6.0 that is.
    But with Firefox, its super slow. Takes 20 seconds to open, and 20 seconds on any link or favorite I click on.
    And here is the confusing part: the problem goes away when I log into my company's network through the VPN client. Once logged in there, Firefox is back to normal and fast again.
    Only when I'm not on VPN at home, does Firefox give me this problem. I have Firefox on my personal computer at home and it goes fast, so why does it give me a problem here on my work computer. Heck even IE 6.0 works normal on my wireless. It's just mind boggling. I would normally install Safari but my company won't allow it at this time.

  • Mac Mini will read from but not write to external CD/DVD drive

    My new Mac Mini won't write CDs or DVDs to my LaCie DVDRW external drive, either in iTunes or through the finder. The computer appears to be writing the disc and then there's an error message right at the end of the process that says it can't access the drive (error code 0x80020020). In reading the help materials, I came across something that said iTunes would only write to an internal drive or a Mac superdrive. That's really no help to me since the Mini did not come with an internal drive. Surely Apple can't be saying I have to go out an buy a new drive for this machine. Has anyone else had this problem?

    You did not answer the question of whether or not the drive works when connected to another Mac or a PC? This is a critical question.

  • Pacman slow in Arch, but fast in Ubuntu

    Hello
    I searched among Pacman related topics on this forum, but I didn't find anything related to problem I have. It takes Pacman very long time to download many small files. Bandwidth isn't the case, but the time it takes Pacman to start downloading next package. My average ping to http://mir.archlinux.fr is about 70ms. When Pacman completes downloading packageN there's a few second lag till it will start downloading packageN+1. There's no such lag when I run Arch Linux in Ubuntu under KVM and using the same mirror.
    PS. I have ipv6 disabled.
    Last edited by Pawlerson (2010-10-09 13:41:19)

    Allan wrote:Have you set up /etc/hosts properly?
    Yes, browsing the web is very fast. My hosts file:
    127.0.0.1               localhost.localdomain   localhost desktop

  • Youtube vid on aTv slow to load, but fast on PC

    Hi, I have a 384kb/s ADSL connection. On my aTv I selected a vid on youtube, then I had to wait about 5 minutes for the vid to start showing. During this time the vid is obviously being buffered. After I watched the vid I marked it as a favorite. I then whent to my PC, logged into youtube, went to my favorites, selected the vid and it started showing immediately while buffering.
    What I cant understand is, why does it take so long to start on the aTv, when the aTv and my PC are both on the same ADSL connection.

    Maybe the web one is 320 resolution and flash, but the AppleTV one is higher resolution and in 264 format (meaning a bigger file size)?
    Also, the AppleTV is probably hitting a different server than when accessed through the web.
    Just a thought.

  • 2008 Mac Pro PCIe SSD write speeds

    I plan on getting a PCIe SSD like the OWC Mercury Accelsior_E2 and seen great read speeds but the write speeds were much slower so anyone have info on this ?

    there is a thread on MacRumors testing three I think different  PCIe cards and it will vary with different makes of SSD. Also putting the system SSD in RAID and/or on PCIe card often does not work reliably or have that much benefit. For data it is great.
    YMMV.
    There are some benchmarks on SSD Review looking at numbers. Different uses benefit from random vs sustained. And sustained is not why you generally use an SSD to begin with.
    0.1 nanosecond seeks, low latency highest I/O per sec, and having high reads are great for system use, audio.
    That kind of setup is excellent for a photoshop scratch array volume, Aperture and Lightroom catalogues. Even iPhoto library.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Getting "SYSTEM ERROR" while generating a PDF in a Workflow method.

    Dear All, I'm getting a "SYSTEM ERROR" when I'm calling the below function module in a Workflow BO Method. CALL FUNCTION wa_funcnm    EXPORTING      /1bcdwb/docparams  = fp_docparams      invoice                     = invoice    IMPORTING      /1bcdw

  • OCR resulting in Grainy Images and junk OCRd Data

    Why is OCRing not working on my PDF? I have two PDFs produced by two different Tiff to PDF tools. Both produce seemingly good PDFs that Acrobat reader has no problem rendering. The process we use to OCR the PDF is to load it into Adobe Acrobat X and

  • XML Data Server and model help

    All, I have the following files 1) travel.dtd 2) travel.xml. I've set up a XML data server with JDBC driver com.sunopsis.jdbc.driver.xml.SnpsXmlDriver and URL = jdbc:snps:xml?d=c:/XML/travel.dtd. I have created a model in designer and have successful

  • NIO and object serialization

    I try to use the new IO API to implement a non-blocking multi-threaded server that communicates with client applications by exchanging serialized objects. I started from the code in the JavaWorld article at http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-09-20

  • RPC over HTTP trouble Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence, 2013 RPCProxy cannot ping GC.

    I currently have an Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence scenario which gives me trouble with the RPC over HTTP part with users with a 2007 mailbox. the MS RCA website performs 2 tests with the MAPI address book endpoints, once against a 2007 mailbox serve