AIX 5L 64 bits + Native compiled PL/SQL

Hi Gurus,
Question for you. I'm tryng to find documentation/procedure on how to switch from native to interpreted pl/sql for AIX 5L 64 bits.
Anyone could point me to some documentation on how to go from Interpreted to Native and vice-versa? Also, documentation about IBM C compiler/ GCC could be usefull too.
Thank you,
Felix

Hi,
Sorry to bump this thread, but I would like to validate something.
Is it possible, or does it make sens, to have a database that has both native and interpreted?
Our PLSQL_CODE_TYPE is set to interpreted but everthing else is configured for native.
When i do the bellow query:
select type, plsql_code_type, count(*)
from dba_plsql_object_settings
where plsql_code_type is not null
group by type, plsql_code_type
order by type, plsql_code_type
We have bunch of functions in native/interpreted, same thing for package, package body, procedure, trigger, type, type body.
Thank you,
Felix

Similar Messages

Native Compiled PL/SQL - Missing ORAPLS9.LIB (9i Release 2)

In configuring the Natively Compiled PL/SQL feature of Oracle 9i, the library file ORAPLS9.LIB file can't be found. I tried generating it with:
LIB /DEF:ORAPLS9.DLL
but got the following warnings which didn't quite look right, and the resultant orapls9.lib file is rather small and doesn't work (unresolved externals).
Is the ORAPLS9.LIB file supposed to be installed with 9i Release 2 for Windows 2000, or am I generating it incorrectly?
BTW, the snpc_makefile.mk file is installed with 9i Release 2 for Windows, but not with 9i Release 1 for Windows.
Thanks,
Kevin Runner
[email protected]
Runner Technologies, Inc.
561-395-9322
OUTPUT
E:\oracle\ora92\bin>lib /def:orapls9.dll
Microsoft (R) Library Manager Version 6.00.8447
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1992-1998. All rights reserved.
LIB : warning LNK4068: /MACHINE not specified; defaulting to IX86
orapls9.dll : warning LNK4017: MZI statement not supported for the target platform; ignored
orapls9.dll : warning LNK4017: $ statement not supported for the target platform; ignored
orapls9.dll : warning LNK4017: &&`j statement not supported for the target platform; ignored
orapls9.dll : warning LNK4017: -? statement not supported for the target platform; ignored
orapls9.dll : warning LNK4017: &E► statement not supported for the target platform; ignored
orapls9.dll : warning LNK4017: -jF◄oC♦♥-^kC♦[os]+IIIIIIIIIIIUo8b8↑oM6SVoG7 Wu♣o~Hd6weI statement not supported for the target platfo
rm; ignored
orapls9.dll : warning LNK4017: jK◄[]IIIIIIIIUo8So]♀VWoC♦o‼o+-?♥t statement not supported for the target platform; ignored
Creating library orapls9.lib and object orapls9.exp

Have you managed to resolve this problem?
I'm having exactly the same experience (it's very frustrating, as I'm trying to run a benchmark at the moment).
Hope to hear.
Regards,
T.
Message was edited by:
terenceo

Native Compiled PL/SQL on WindowsXP (Visual Studio)

Has anyone tried to native compile PL/SQL packages on Windows XP using Visual Studio?
Please give me your values for PLSQL* initialization parameters and a makefile that works.
/Hakan

Hi,
Sorry to bump this thread, but I would like to validate something.
Is it possible, or does it make sens, to have a database that has both native and interpreted?
Our PLSQL_CODE_TYPE is set to interpreted but everthing else is configured for native.
When i do the bellow query:
select type, plsql_code_type, count(*)
from dba_plsql_object_settings
where plsql_code_type is not null
group by type, plsql_code_type
order by type, plsql_code_type
We have bunch of functions in native/interpreted, same thing for package, package body, procedure, trigger, type, type body.
Thank you,
Felix

Plsql_optimize_level = 3 and native compilation in SQL Developer?

SQL Developer: Version 3.1.06 (Build MAIN-06.82)
Oracle: 11gR2
OS: Ubuntu 10.10
Whenever I compile a PL/SQL unit in SQL Developer (using 'Compile' button) it is compiled with the following settings:
PLSQL_OPTIMIZE_LEVEL = 2
PLSQL_CODE_TYPE = 'INTERPRETED'
However, if I issue the following commands in an SQL Worksheet:
ALTER SESSION SET plsql_optimize_level = 3;
ALTER PACKAGE PACKAGE_NAME COMPILE PLSQL_CODE_TYPE = NATIVE;
the query SELECT PLSQL_OPTIMIZE_LEVEL, PLSQL_CODE_TYPE FROM ALL_PLSQL_OBJECT_SETTINGS WHERE NAME = 'PACKAGE_NAME'; resullts in
PLSQL_OPTIMIZE_LEVEL     PLSQL_CODE_TYPE
3     NATIVE
3     NATIVE
Is it possible to make SQL Developer to use these settings by default?
P.S. It seems that Tools > Preferences > Database > PL/SQL Compiler menu section is missing the options I need (Optimization level drop-down menu have numbers 0-2, but not 3). Are there any plans to support these features in the future releases?
Edited by: Ravshan Abbasov on Feb 6, 2012 6:28 AM

Hi Ravshan,
I thought a workaround would be to create a sql script like the following:
alter session set plsql_code_type=native;
alter session set plsql_optimize_level=3; then point to it in the setting for Tools|Preferences|Database|Filename for connection startup script. That doesn't work however, as the other preference setting for plsql_optimize_level overrides the session value of 3 during compilation from the UI.
According to Oracle documentation, level 3 was added for Oracle 11g. Prior to that, the same effect could be achieved by level 2 in conjunction with the INLINE pragma in the PL/SQL code.
You might want to make a feature request for this on the SQL Developer Exchange so the community can vote and comment.
Regards,
Gary
SQL Developer Team
Edited by: Gary Graham on Feb 6, 2012 2:32 PM
And, of course, Compile for Debug does not work with the 'native' setting.

Native Compilation on EBS Database

'm upgrading an 11i database from 9i to 10g. It is mentioned that as an option I might turn on Native Compilation. Native Compilation is helpful mostly with compute-intensive PL/SQLs, does anyone have any insights regarding the effect of Native Compilation on an EBS database?

Hi,
Take the question marks off the end:
PL/SQL Native Compilation
PL/SQL Native Compilation
PL/SQL Native Compilation Conversion Timings
Re: PL/SQL Native Compilation Conversion Timings
Regards,
Gareth
Blog: http://garethroberts.blogspot.com/

PL/SQL Native Compilation - not working!

I'm at my wits end here.
Oracle 10.2.0.3 under Windows Server 2003 (i know, i know...) and a whole lot of procedural PL/SQL that I think could benefit from native compilation. I've done this on Linux/unix environments a few times but never imagined it would be quite so painful under Windows.
Ended up using Visual C++ 2003 (7.1 compiler) which compiled everything. MinGW wouldn't compile everything, lots of undefined references to _setjmp and others, but that's a different subject.
Anyway, after two days of dealing with issues, I finally get things to compile. The .dll is created. The init parameters say we're native. The test procedure is recompiled as native, and verified in dba_plsql_object_settings. As far as I am aware, native compilation is present and working. But when I run the thing.... performance is the same. Recompile as interpreted... same. Recompile as native again... same. This is demo code here, simple loop, the kind of thing that is 10x faster on my Linux environment.
Basically the behavior is as though native compilation just isn't working... the DLL isn't working. Funny thing is that it -was- working earlier with the same code... right up until I bounced the box. Now I am dead in the water with no log file, no trace, nothing... just a non-functional native compilation feature.
Any ideas? Anyone else struggle with this?
Bob

SELECT name, value
FROM gv$parameter
WHERE name LIKE '%code%';
Did you do this before you bounced the database?
ALTER SYSTEM SET plsql_compiler_flags = 'NATIVE';
or
ALTER SESSION SET plsql_compiler_flags = 'NATIVE';when perhaps you should have done this:
ALTER SYSTEM SET plsql_code_type = 'NATIVE' SCOPE=BOTH;

PLS-00923: native compilation failed: make:spdtexmk:

Hello,
I am using Oracle 92 on Windows Platform.
I am trying to change Interpreter to NATIVE mode.
I changed parameters as needed. Below are the parameters I have after change.
SQL> show parameter plsql_compiler_flags
NAME TYPE VALUE
plsql_compiler_flags string NATIVE
SQL> show parameter native
NAME TYPE VALUE
plsql_native_c_compiler string D:\Borland\BCC55\Bin\BCC32.EXE
plsql_native_library_dir string D:\oracle\ora92\plsql\Lib
plsql_native_library_subdir_count integer 500
plsql_native_linker string D:\Borland\BCC55\Bin\ilink32.exe
plsql_native_make_file_name string D:\oracle\ora92\plsql\spnc_makefile.mk
plsql_native_make_utility string make
I am using Borland C.
I changed a bit in mk file. But when I compile a simpe SP, I am getting PLS-00923: native compilation failed: make:spdtexmk: error.
I guess it could be compile error, So is there any one has a sample make file for borland C on windows platform!! That might helps me!!!

Hi,
i tried everythind to get to runs this under windows 2000
but nothing worked,
the question is, if it's supported
doese anybody knoe here?
With linux it worked in 5 minutes of configuration;
The advantage is that always a c compiler is on board
Carl

Please explian what is native compilation and how to use it

hi all.
please explian what is native compilation and how to use it
regards

It's explained well in the PL/SQL User's Guide and Reference
Compiling PL/SQL Code for Native Execution
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/appdev.920/a96624/12_tune.htm#48419

Loading a 32-bit native library on a 64-bit JVM environment

Hello
I have a 3rd party 32-bit native library (abc.so). I am creating a JVM from my 64-bit C code (myC.c). Within this JVM i try to load the 32-bit abc.so
I get the following run-time error
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: abc.so: ld.so.1: myC: fatal: abc.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1480)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1404)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:772)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:832)
When I try to load the same abc.so using a wrapper Java code(instead of myC.c) by running it with java -d32, it works ok.
Do we have any option that we can set while creating a JVM from C, with which we can allow it to load 32-bit native libraries?
Moreover do we have a list of all the options that can be set in the JavaVMInitArgs?
I am using Java 1.4, as 1.3 doesn't support 64-bit JVM.
regards
Rahul

Hi,
I was also having a problem under 64 bit, Now I am certain that if ur Java code makes a call to the DLL, make sure that DLL is compiled under 64 bit compiler and not 32 bit compiler. This is the mistake I made and the JVM was throwing unsatisfied link error. Now this DLL (compiled under 64 bit) could call a 32 bit dll, I dont think that should be a problem.
Hope it helps.
Subu

PLS-00923: native compilation failed: Visual Studio not

hi,
I'm using oracle 10g version 10.2.0.1 running on windows xp pro service pack 3. I'm trying to switch from interpreted to native compilation, and here are the parameters I've set:
plsql_native_library_dir = D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\plsql
plsql_code_type = NATIVE
plsql_native_library_subdir_count = 0
plsql_compiler_flags = NATIVE, NON_DEBUG
Now I'm trying to run the following statements:
ALTER SESSION SET plsql_code_type = 'NATIVE';
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test_speed AS
v_number NUMBER;
BEGIN
FOR i IN 1 .. 1000000 LOOP
v_number := i / 1000;
END LOOP;
END;
SET TIMING ON
SQL> EXEC test_speed;
BEGIN test_speed; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00905: object SYS.TEST_SPEED is invalid
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
SQL> show err
Errors for PROCEDURE TEST_SPEED:
LINE/COL ERROR
0/0 PLS-00923: native compilation failed: Visual Studio not
found::Could not open registry key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\MICROSOFT\VISUALSTUDIO\7.1\SETUP:No
error
I have search for the error in google but I can't find anything useful. What do I need to set-up/change to achieve my goals.
Thanks and God bless,
Chris

hi,
I'm using oracle 10g version 10.2.0.1 running on windows xp pro service pack 3. I'm trying to switch from interpreted to native compilation, and here are the parameters I've set:
plsql_native_library_dir = D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\plsql
plsql_code_type = NATIVE
plsql_native_library_subdir_count = 0
plsql_compiler_flags = NATIVE, NON_DEBUG
Now I'm trying to run the following statements:
ALTER SESSION SET plsql_code_type = 'NATIVE';
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test_speed AS
v_number NUMBER;
BEGIN
FOR i IN 1 .. 1000000 LOOP
v_number := i / 1000;
END LOOP;
END;
SET TIMING ON
SQL> EXEC test_speed;
BEGIN test_speed; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00905: object SYS.TEST_SPEED is invalid
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
SQL> show err
Errors for PROCEDURE TEST_SPEED:
LINE/COL ERROR
0/0 PLS-00923: native compilation failed: Visual Studio not
found::Could not open registry key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\MICROSOFT\VISUALSTUDIO\7.1\SETUP:No
error
I have search for the error in google but I can't find anything useful. What do I need to set-up/change to achieve my goals.
Thanks and God bless,
Chris

Native Compilation with MinGW on 10GR2

I have downloaded and installed 10gR2 on Windows 2000. It looks like the MinGW compiler is now supported on Windows. After looking in the spnc_commands file, I see the following near the end of the file:
#GCC (MINGW) is now supported for plsql native comp on windows.
#Download MinGW-3.1.0-1.exe from http://www.mingw.org.
#The following two commands assume that GCC is installed at the default
#location which is c:/MinGW. Change the paths to gcc and ld appropriately
#if the installation is done in a different directory.
#Finally, to use GCC for native comp, comment the above command line for cl.exe
#and uncomment the following two comand lines.
c:/MinGW/bin/gcc -c %(src) -O1 -I$(ORACLE_HOME)/plsql/public -I$(ORACLE_HOME)/plsql/include -o %(obj)
c:/MinGW/bin/ld -shared -e 0x0 %(obj) $(ORACLE_HOME)/plsql/lib/libpncrt.a $(ORACLE_HOME)/lib/orapls10.lib -o %(dll)
The last line references ORACLE_HOME/plsql/lib/libpncrt.a
However, this directory or file does not exist anywhere on my Oracle installation or my MinGW directory.
Does anyone know what this file is?
Brett

Thanks Brett,
In reading Jens' paper, it almost looks like you can generate your own library file, but I think my unfamiliarity with the native compile option may be confusing me. I can't tell if the libraries being generated are the actual PL/SQL routines getting stored on the operating system or if I can generate "libpncrt.a" from some other file that is in unix format using a home brew "makefile" utility (not supplied in the paper).
Since 10g has depricated the parameters PLSQL_NATIVE_MAKE_FILE_NAME and PLSQL_NATIVE_MAKE_UTILITY then the instructions in Jens' paper seem to be incompatable.
Can you explain what "port-specific" means?
Thanks Again,
Bill

What is Native Compilation

Hi Gurus,
What is Native Compilation?
Naresh

A very good document on PL/SQL native compilation is on Note 151224.1 .

How to use 64-bit native libraries on Solaris?

This question has probably been asked many times, but I couldn't find the answer in my searches.
How can I get Java Web Start on a Solaris client (Solaris 10 in this case, with JRE 1.5, both 32-bit and 64-bit versions installed) to run a java application that includes a 64-bit native code library? The application runs fine when invoked directly on the workstation.
The application downloads properly with Java Web Start, including the jar file that has the native shared object, but when the native library is loaded by the java application, I get a "wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64" error.
I assume that is because Web Start is invoking the 32-bit java VM, which can't load a 64-bit library. I tried configuring Java Web Start to use the 64-bit VM (by setting the path to java to ".../jre/bin/sparcv9/java" in the javaws console) but then I get an error that says "Can't load library: .../jre/lib/sparcv9/libdeploy.so".
Does Java Web Start support the use of 64-bit native code libraries, and if so, what am I doing wrong?
Thanks.

So, it may be better to create links in $APP_HOME/bin/java that point to the binaries in /usr/jdk/version-you-want-to-use/bin/sparcv9 rather than copying binaries.
To see current java links: (I edited all non-java-related links out of listing)
-> ls -la /usr/bin/j*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/jar -> ../java/bin/jar
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 21 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/jarsigner -> ../java/bin/jarsigner
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 16 Oct 29 2007 /usr/bin/java -> ../java/bin/java
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 17 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/javac -> ../java/bin/javac
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 19 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/javadoc -> ../java/bin/javadoc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 17 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/javah -> ../java/bin/javah
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 17 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/javap -> ../java/bin/javap
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 18 Oct 29 2007 /usr/bin/javaws -> ../java/bin/javaws
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 24 Oct 29 2007 /usr/bin/jcontrol -> ../java/jre/bin/jcontrol
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/jdb -> ../java/bin/jdb
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/jmplay -> ../jdk/packages/jmf/bin/jmp
lay
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 50 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/jnlp2pkg -> ../jdk/packages/org.jdesk
top.jdic-0.8/bin/jnlp2pkg
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Oct 1 2007 /usr/bin/jsh -> ../../sbin/sh
BTW, on my machine (SunFire v445, Solaris10, 64-bit)
isainfo -v produces this:
-> isainfo -v
64-bit sparcv9 applications
vis2 vis
32-bit sparc applications
vis2 vis v8plus div32 mul32
So, what will this do for me?
or even better $(JAVA_HOME)/bin/`isainfo -v`/Edited by: SolarisSAinPA on Jun 12, 2008 5:38 PM
Added listing of java-related-links

How to run 64-bit native code with Java Web Start

This question has probably been asked many times, but I couldn't find anything in my searches.
How can I get Java Web Start on a Solaris client (Solaris 10 in this case, with JRE 1.5) to run a java application that includes a 64-bit native code library? The application downloads fine, including the jar file that has the native shared object, but when the native library is loaded by the java application, I get a "wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64" error.
I assume that is because Web Start is invoking the 32-bit java VM, which can't load a 64-bit library. I tried configuring Java Web Start to use the 64-bit VM (by setting the path to java to ".../jre/bin/sparcv9/java" in the javaws console) but then I get an error that says "Can't load library: .../jre/lib/sparcv9/libdeploy.so".
Does Java Web Start support 64-bit native code, and if so, what do I need to do differently?
Thanks.

No it can't. On the Sun download page of the JRE it says that 64 Bit systems need to use the 32 Bit JRE to execute Plugins - this might be the same for Web Start apps.

System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeException (0x80004005): Native components of SQL Server Compact engine are not loaded. Please reinstall Microsoft SQL Server Compact.

Hi
I have followed http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173298(v=sql.110).aspx to support private deployment for my application in anycpu mode.
Though its working fine on several XP and Windows 7 , on on particular XP machine , I get this
System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeException (0x80004005): Native components of SQL Server Compact engine are not loaded. Please reinstall Microsoft SQL Server Compact.
   at System.Data.SqlServerCe.NativeMethods.ThrowIfNativeLibraryNotLoaded()
   at System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeEngine.Dispose(Boolean disposing)
   at System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeEngine.Finalize()
Can anybody give me directions on this?

Do you use LINQ to SQL or EF or ADO.NET, is what
Yes, I would start by investigating:
- Do you REALLY need "any CPU", or can you cope with just x86 to make things simpler (See my LINQ to SQL blog post)
- Is SQL Server Compact installed on this PC, and which build (is it same or different from the one you distribute)
- Use Process Explorer from sysinternals on the machine to find out where the app tries to load the native libraries from (and fails)
Please mark as answer, if this was it. Visit my SQL Server Compact blog http://erikej.blogspot.com

AIX 5L 64 bits + Native compiled PL/SQL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for