AK1 segment missing in 997 in B2B 10g

I have configured a 997 acknowledgment in B2B 10g with version 5010VICS . In reports i can see AK1 segment in xml payload while it is missing in wire messege payload.Please suggest.

Can you enable validation and test again. I doubt that ecs is not correct and that's why translation is not working.
Regards,
Anuj

Similar Messages

Partner Self-registration in Oracle B2B 10g

Hi B2B team,
Wanted to confirm from you if there is any provision for Partner self-registration in Oracle B2B 10g. We are on the latest patch. I am not aware of this functionality but wanted to get this confirmed from the product team.
Also, we will require a server restart when a new TP comes onboard in Oracle B2B 10g isnt it? Is my understanding correct or is there something we can do to overcome this?
Regards
Kavitha

Kavitha,
Drop a mail to B2B product dev team/PM to know more on this part. As far as I know there is no such facility in 10g. Yes, bounce may be required in case of certificate changes involved.
Regards,
Anuj

How to get the file name from Oracle B2B 10g

Hi My requirement is I am getting a CSV file from Trading partner, I am using oracle 10g b2b to translate the data.
In my BPEL 10g I am using AQ adapter to get the message from IP_IN_QUEUE.
Now I want to get the file name Eg: SampleFile.dat of the CSV file in my BPEL process.
I tried using the b2b.filename property in the receive activity and it is not getting the file name.
<sequence name="main">
    <receive name="Receive_Note" partnerLink="GetB2BNote"
             portType="ns1:Dequeue_ptt" operation="Dequeue"
             variable="Receive_Note_Dequeue_InputVariable"
             createInstance="yes">
             <bpelx:property name="b2b.fileName" variable="WriteFileName"/>
    </receive>
</sequence>
Can you help me to get the file name from Oracle b2b 10g ?
Thanks,
b2b user

Hi My requirement is I am getting a CSV file from Trading partner, I am using oracle 10g b2b to translate the data.
In my BPEL 10g I am using AQ adapter to get the message from IP_IN_QUEUE.
Now I want to get the file name Eg: SampleFile.dat of the CSV file in my BPEL process.
I tried using the b2b.filename property in the receive activity and it is not getting the file name.
<sequence name="main">
    <receive name="Receive_Note" partnerLink="GetB2BNote"
             portType="ns1:Dequeue_ptt" operation="Dequeue"
             variable="Receive_Note_Dequeue_InputVariable"
             createInstance="yes">
             <bpelx:property name="b2b.fileName" variable="WriteFileName"/>
    </receive>
</sequence>
Can you help me to get the file name from Oracle b2b 10g ?
Thanks,
b2b user

DBout segment missing in receiver payload

Hello,
We have a problem with a scenario at our customer.
We created a B1if File to B1 scenario.
For some files we get a failure message in the message log saying:
"DBout segment missing in receiver payload (handover to database not possible) "
When we do a retry with restart in-process (biu processing and outbound) it works.
Sometimes a second retry is needed.
Any ideas?
Best regards,
Steven

Hi Mark,
Thank you very much for the explenation!
I will try this and let you know if I got it to work
I'm very new to B1i as you can see.
I found the solution to our problem.
The processing of the B1if File to B1 scenario is devided into 3 scenario's.
First scenario: a timer checks every minute for files in a certain directory 'IN'. 1 file is copied into another directory 'PROCESSING' and called ORDER.csv. The original file is being cut and paste into directory 'SAVED'.
Second scenario: check if file ORDER.csv exist in directory 'PROCESSING'. Some checks and some processing are done on the file.
Last scenario: every minute this is run with a timer. Some checks are done and the objects are created in B1.
The processing of 1 file takes about 1 minute to 1 minute and a half!
The problem was that a timer was set to check every minute if there was a file. (first scenario).. offcourse when the processing is still busy this will fail and I believe that is why a file was almost always skipped.
I changed the timer to every 2 minutes and now everything works like a sharm!
Problem is that it takes offcourse twice the time as before.
Do you or anybody else knows a possibility to speed this up?
Is it possible to create the scenario in 1 scenario instead of 3? or maybe 2?
Kind regards,
Steven

Issue:EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing):Idoc extention

Hi all,
I have extended the the standard IDOC MATMAS05 classification view with structure as below-
E1MARAM                        Master material general data (MARA)--->Mandatory segment
     Z1KLART                        KLART --->Extended chaild to E1MARAM
         Z1CLASS                        segment for class --->Extended chaild to Z1KLART
         Z1CHARACTERISTIC               CHARACTERISTIC --->Extended chaild to Z1KLART
     E1MARA1                        Additional Fields for E1MARAM
     E1MAKTM                        Master material short texts (MAKT) --->Mandatory segment(Child   to
E1MARAM )
I am getting an error in IDOC fro material master as:EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing ).
Diagnosys By system is :*The segment E1MAKTM has the attribute 'Mandatory' in the syntax description of the basic type MATMAS05 (customer enhancement ZMATMAS05). However, the segment is missing in the IDoc. The segment number logged in the status record identifies the item before which the segment is missing.
This error may have been triggered by an unidentifiable segment before the expected mandatory segment.*
Please help to resolve the issue.
Thank you.
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 30, 2009 11:25 AM
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 30, 2009 11:31 AM

Hi,
   You cannot add an segment in the middle of other segments.
YOu have to add any segment at the last.
If you want to add a segment as the child of another segment, it should be added after the last child of the parent segment.
In you case, you have to add your segment after the E1CUCFG segment.(NOt under that segement)
Regards,
Ravi Kanth Talagana

IDOC Segment missing for MATMASS Message type

Through change pointer program for the message type YAUIHUBMATMAS IDOC is triggered.
1) Change pointers are defined in system for the message type T Code u2013 BD52.
2) If respective field is changed in material master , this data is stored in change pointers table BDCP.
3) Background jobs are scheduled every day, which searches for the changes pointer table and triggers the idoc.
In our case IDOC is getting generated but with one segment missing.
We have analysed the succesful and failed IDOC and found desrepency is field updation of BDCP table.
Succesful case contain material number in object value of ZZMDST field where as failed contain some other value.
Can anyone please help us to guide how the BDCP table is updated and the values are mapped in it or any other suggestion to find why the segment is missing in it.
Regards,
Roshni.

Jürgen L. wrote:
> I have never seen a YAUIHUBMATMAS IDOC, nor a ZZMDST field .
> This seems to be home made.
>
> You are expecting that standard SAP programs are generating change pointers for your z-fields?
> Do you see a change history in material master for your z-field?
>
>
> follow the slution from this thread:
>
Yes ,This is a Z -field.
Change pointer is triggering the idoc fo this Z-field but in some cases one segment is missing .
This is z-field in the basic data view of material master.
Yes , we have checked the change history in material master for this field it is getting updated there in BDCP table as well but in BDCP table if this field is flagged then object value is not contain material number instead it contain some other number .
But in case of succesful IDOC the object value is same as material number.
Regards,
Roshni

Oracle SOA B2B 10g Console Issue

Hi All,
I'm trying to create a Business Action in Oracle SOA B2B 10g Console but getting below error, please suggest.
Error
An error occured when creating the business action
Erroe -: AIP-11052: Writing following objects: Document Type failed due to following constraint violation:
DOCUMENTTPE. CAN NOT UPDATE UNVERSIONABLE OBJECT IN A VALIDATED CONFIGURATION
Using Custom Document over Generic exchange protocol to create a business action.
Note: Tried by bouncing server once, even though getting same error.
Regards,
Jagadesh.

Jagadesh,
Oracle 10g version is very old release of Oracle B2B. In the 11g or 12c release, it has been enhanced with many features, optimised, integrated with SOA and it is very easy to use.
Hence it is highly advised to install the later version of 11g or 12c.
This link might help you - https://blogs.oracle.com/oracleb2bgurus/entry/what_it_takes_to_migrate_an_ex
Incase if there is any issue in production environment of 10g, you might not get the support if you file any SR.
Regards,

EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory group/segment missing)

hi EDI/IDoc experts,
Need you help urgently. According to the requirement, i need populate a segement E1IDT01 of basic type PEXR2002 . I added the code , then run and generate an idoc , the new segment
E1IDT01 was populated, but Syntax error 26 happend. Error message as below.   It also strange that i can see E1IDKU5 populate out as usual, but some others segment disappeared , i am sure that in my code ,i didn't changed any variable related to other segement . how can i fix this problem?
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory group missing)
Message no. E0079
Diagnosis
The segment group E1IDKU5 has the attribute 'Mandatory' in the syntax description of the basic type PEXR2002 (customer enhancement ). However, the segment group is missing in the IDoc. The segment number logged in the status record identifies the item before which the segment group is missing.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type PEXR2002 (customer enhancement ).

Hi all,
Thanks so much for your concern!
Finally ,this problem has been figured out .
Requirement is user want to use segment E1IDT01 in idoc to populate the long text they maintained in accounting document vendor item line (use FB01 to create accounting doc).
Why I made out " EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory group/segment missing)" this message out ,because I didn't fill data correctly. I missed to keep SY-TABIX in momory .
when we use Function module ,or do..enddo...or read table it_table. we should be careful that SY-TABIX is changed .So we can't just use MODIFY EDIDD_TABLE INDEX SY-TABIX in the last . we should define a local variable to keep SY-TABIX in memory and then use it to modify EDIDD_TABLE.
Follow is the final code.
IF SEGMENT_NAME = 'E1IDT01'.
TABLES :STXL.
* Define for long text getting
DATA: LIT_TLINE LIKE TLINE   OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: LV_STRING(2000) TYPE C.
DATA: LV_TDNAME TYPE THEAD-TDNAME,
        LV_ID     TYPE THEAD-TDID     VALUE '0001',
        LV_LANG   TYPE THEAD-TDSPRAS VALUE 'E' ,
        LV_OBJ    TYPE THEAD-TDOBJECT VALUE 'DOC_ITEM'.
data:   LV_LINE   TYPE I,                " long Text lines
        LV_LEN    TYPE I,                " long Text length
        LV_TABIX LIKE SY-TABIX.
* Clear memory
CLEAR:LV_TDNAME,
        LV_STRING,
        LV_LINE,
        LIT_TLINE, LIT_TLINE[],
        LV_LEN,
        LV_TABIX.
* Keep sy-tabix memory using a variable--This is the key point
LV_TABIX = SY-TABIX.
* Combine TDNAME with company code + accounting doc + fiscal year + item number.
    CONCATENATE REGUP_DATA-BUKRS REGUP_DATA-BELNR
                 REGUP_DATA-GJAHR REGUP_DATA-BUZEI INTO LV_TDNAME.
* When vendor item has long text , read long text into lv_string
    SELECT SINGLE *
      FROM STXL
      WHERE TDOBJECT = LV_OBJ
        AND TDNAME   = LV_TDNAME
        AND TDID     = LV_ID
        AND TDSPRAS = 'E'.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
      CALL FUNCTION 'READ_TEXT'
        EXPORTING
          CLIENT   = SY-MANDT
          ID       = LV_ID
          LANGUAGE = LV_LANG
          NAME     = LV_TDNAME
          OBJECT   = LV_OBJ
        TABLES
          LINES    = LIT_TLINE.
      IF NOT LIT_TLINE[] IS INITIAL.
        DESCRIBE TABLE LIT_TLINE LINES LV_LINE.
        DO LV_LINE TIMES.
          READ TABLE LIT_TLINE INDEX SY-INDEX.
          CONCATENATE LV_STRING LIT_TLINE-TDLINE INTO LV_STRING.
        ENDDO.
        LV_LEN = STRLEN( LV_STRING ).
* Make sure we only need less than 840 charicters
        IF LV_LEN > 840.
          LV_STRING = LV_STRING+0(840).
          LV_LEN    = 840.
        ENDIF.
* Populate Vendor item long text with segment E1IDT01 start from
* Fields TXT03 to TXT14.
         EDIDD_TABLE-SDATA+147(LV_LEN) = LV_STRING.
        MODIFY EDIDD_TABLE INDEX LV_TABIX.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.

EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing)

HI all,
Error Message - EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing)
Status ID - E0
Message No - 072
Status of the IDoc - 26
Please help me how to solve this issue?
Thanks,
Srini

Hi,
This error normally comes up when the sequence of segments has been disturbed.
For successfully posting an IDOC you need to maintain the sequence of the segments as in WE30.
You can also check which segments are mandatory in WE30 by clicking on the segment name and the pop up that comes.
Thanks,
Manish

CAD Segment missing even though XML contains it

Hi Folks,
I am seeing one strange issue in the B2B setup. I am trying to send an invoice to my TP, i see that the Invoice gets picked up by B2B. I got the 997 for the same but when i observed it
i saw that the 997 said it rejected the 810.
Now upon observation i found a strange thing. I see the payload and find my xml as i enqueue. However in the translated EDI document i found one element missing.
CAD SEgment has element 91 and 140 in the xml
however in the EDI the element 91 is missing.
Since 91 is a mandatory field the 810 gets rejected.
Can anyone shed some light on this?

I have verified that the setup has the correct ecs files. I also checked the outgoing ISA segment which shows the correct version number. Even if it were not mandatory if i am sending that piece of information then should it not be translated to the EDI file? As i said it does show in the xml that is sent to B2B.

Issue in Setting up Inbound and Outbound 997 in B2B

Hello All-
Please find the background and issue details.
Background
=======
1. We use a common business action (Doc Type:997 and Doc Type Revision: 4010) to send Outbound 997 to the Trading Partners for the corresponding inbound documents from them. This common Business Action is used across all Trading Partners set up in the system to send Outbound 997. We attach this business action to the agreement for a particular Inbound Transaction Agrmnt
2. As per new requirement, we have to enable Inbound 997 which is also Doc Type : 997 and Doc Type Revision as 4010. However, as mentioned above, since there is already a Business Action with doc type 997 and doc type revision 4010 combination, B2B did not allow us to setup the common inbound 997 business action
3. As a workaround we modified the Doc Type Revision of the Common Outbound 997 Business Action to some random number and redeployed all the configurations that were using the Outbound 997 Business Action. We retained the Doc Type Revision as 4010 for the Inbound 997 Business Action.
Issue Details
=======
1. After modifying the Outbound Business Action, as mentioned above, B2B is failing to identify the Outbound 997 Business Action and hence not able to generate the Outbound 997 for a particular inbound document.
If anybody has faced similar issue, I would really appreciate if you can provide me pointers to resolve this issue and also let me know if we are doing the set-ups correctly.
Please let me know if you need any additional information from my side.
Thanks,
Dibya

Hi Dibya,
In case of outbound EDI, document type and document type revision is used to identify a transaction set. Check whether you are receiving these two values correct. On the basis of transaction set and trading partner, it will identify the agreement and then find the particular business action in that agreement.
Can you please mention that till what step your B2B is able to process the outbound EDI document?
Thanks & Regards,
Anuj

EDI X12 Version 4060 setup issue in Oracle B2B 10g

Hi All,
We are currently encountering some issues in doing Inbound Trading Partner Set-ups to accept Inbound 210 Documents using EDI X12 Version 4060.
We created an ecs file(only from ST to SE) excluding envelop, doing all the reqd set up in B2B ,keeping "use Default Document definition" box checked (for 210), deploying agreement and all ; we are getting below error:
+Element ISA12 is a coded list element. Code '00406' is not allowed. Segment ISA is defined in the guideline at position 010.{br}{br}This error was detected at:{br}{tab}Segment Count: 1{br}{tab}Element Position: 12{br}{tab}Characters: 84 through 89+
any help regarding this welcomed.
Regards,
Ravi

Hi Anuj,
Yes this problem is coming in 10.1.2 b2b version..steps we have done are mentioned below :
1. create a new business action -->created a new dcoument protocol with revision 4060
Now we define the document protocol parameters (here we mentioned ISA & GS qualifier
& values for the host trading partner) & we leave the interchange ecs file & group ecs file values blank here.
here we leave these parameter values : Interchange Control Version Number & Version/Release/Industry Identifier Code as Null or blank.
Next we define Document Type: 210 with revision as 4060 & then attach a new document definition with this
(here we specify the transaction set ecs & xsd files ( this just has the ST-SE transaction set meaning the ecs
doesn't have the ISA & GS envelopes here in it( while creating ecs in spec builder we are not Inserting the envelopes in it))
2. TP definition/setup :
Here we define the trading partner -- here we define a new operational capability -- here we select the
business action created in step1.
Now here we uncheck the option (Use defualt Document Protocol Paramters and mention the interchange & group qualifier & values for this trading partner.
here we mention Interchange Control Version Number : 00406
Version/Release/Industry Identifier Code : 004060
Here also we don't mention anything for interchange ecs file & group ecs file values, we leave these blank/null.
Also we leave the checkbox for : Use Default document definition as Yes.
Now could you please review & advise what exactly needs to be done.
regards

IDOC Segment missing when reaching to ECC

Hi,
This is file-to-IDOC scenario. When file is loaded XI is picking and creating IDOC with all segments as expected in XI, but when reached to ECC sytem main header and item segments are missing.
Refreshed cache, reloaded metadata in XI, did full system cache refresh but no luck.
Checked in ECC thru IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS function module to create IDOC and it did create successfully with all segments.
Segments are missing only when coming from XI. We are in SAP ECC 6.0 & PI 7.0. IDOC I am using is DELVRY03

Hi Sriram,
Can you please check this note which disucss about the same issue:
Note 1170918 - IDoc adapter: Missing fields and deleted metadata
Regards,
---Satish

Entry aids in (Assignment to Profitability Segment) Missing -TCode FEBA

Hi All,
When i am using the transaction Code FEBA to clear the customer account the entry aids (Assignment to Profitability Segment)
is missing. as the system takes FB05 in background of FEBA. But when i use Transaction code FB05 to clear the customer account the Entry aids is appearing on the screen.
Can some one let me k ow how the Entry aids Can be seen in the TCode Feba?

Hi,
I think in this case the transaction is processed by system in background as a batch-job.
I assume you are on release 5.0 or higher. Note 581739 should be part of the system. In this case for batch processing no more entry aids will be displayed, because in the new standard always all chararcteristics will be displayed and offered to be filled.
regards
Waman

PFAL : HRMD_A segments missing

Dear All,
I'm using tcode PFAL in order to create an Idoc HRMD_A07.
The Idoc is well created but some segments are missing though they should contain some data.
Those segments are E2P0028 (IT28) and E2P1000 (IT1000).
Does anybody know how to get those missing segments ?
Thank you.

Hi Friend,
       You just check the SM31 transaction - T777D and maintain them.
       check for the segments in particular infotypes which your segments are not created E2P0028 (IT28) and E2P1000 (IT1000).
         for example go to RP_0028 and click on that u can see the field called IDOC Segment - check whther this field is filled with
          your idoc segment - like E1p0028 and in second segment field fill with your E2P0028 segment.
         so that this segments will get filled in idoc after the PFAL transaction runs.....
Thanks,
   Sata.

AK1 segment missing in 997 in B2B 10g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for