Album Folders Still in FIle Structure

After upgrading computers and importing my library there are still album folders in the file structure menu. I can go to Pictures/iPhoto Library/albums... and see album folders that no longer exist in iPhoto. Can I delete them safely?
Thanks

Here's the thing, I want that album folder in my IPhoto Library, and after I installed iLife 05 it disappeared. I used that to keep track of what I uploaded onto snapfish etc. How can I get it back?
Thanks,
M

Similar Messages

  • Reformated external hard disk still shows files and folders

    Hello.
    I recently bought an external hard drive, which I'm connecting by eSATA through the ExpressCard slot in my (now last-generation) 15-inch MBP, late 2008. I began getting disk errors and disk utility told me to reformat the drive. I reformatted it (as HFS, unjournaled) using through Disk Utility using the "write zeros" option, which took about 4 hours. What puzzles me is that Disk Utility still shows that there 9 folders and 16 files on the disk, with about 160 MB of space used. If I verify the disk, these numbers increase. Each time I erase the disk, they go back down to 9 folders, 16 files. Of course, in Finder, the disk shows 0 items.
    Can anyone explain to me why this is happening? Should it be this way, or is something wrong here? I am still getting "keys out of order" errors even after this reformat.
    Thank you

    It sounds like it never gets to the stage of actually erasing any data. This may indicate a directory problem with the drive*:
    http://www.macmaps.com/directoryfaq.html
    Which could also mean something is wrong with the drive itself.
    So if after repairing the directory, you still can't format the drive, I would assume that your drive is faulty, or the format you are choosing doesn't work well in your operating system.
    - * Links to my pages may give me compensation.

  • E71, deleted music files but album names still the...

    Hi there ,just got E71 loades a couple of albums then tried to delete them song files went ok but album names still there. Music refresh does nothing, any one any ideas....thanks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    hi Can you tell me what procedure you followed to delete tha albums? Whether it was from phone or PC suite? I am using E71 and i am nor facing any such issue

  • My folders stills how up, but all my files are gone!

    I had a backup of ALL my pictures from the last 5 years and all songs in iCloud Drive, totalizing more than 60gb and it's ALL GONE!
    The folders still show up, but they are empty, both in www.icloud.com, my PC, my Mac, my iPad, my iPhone.
    It says I have 199gb of free space (I pay for the 200gb plan), it just deleted everything!

    Connect via cable to the computer that you use for sync.  From iTunes, select the iPod and then select the Summary tab.  Follow directions for Restore and be sure to say "no" to creating a backup.  (You don't want to overwrite the backup file with blank data.)  You will be warned that all data (apps, music, movies, etc.) will be erased but, as the Restore finishes, you will be asked if you wish the contents of the backup to be copied to the iPod.  This time, say "yes."

  • File Structure with iTunes on an External Drive

    This is an image of the file structure on my external drive that holds all of my iTunes music:
    Is this correct, or should I have set it up differently? I am asking since it is differnet the the iTunes file structure on my MacBook Pro and some files will get uploaded to my external drive and others will go onto my MBP,s iTunes Music folder. All of my iPhone/iPad apps, Album Artwork, Mobile Applications. I have Book folders on both drives and the both have books on them.
    I should say that I had a major problem a few years ago, which has nothing to do with the above problem, with one of the iTunes updates which disconnected most of my songs from their respective files. I tried a solution a friend sugested, which really messed up the files and now many of the files have different info inside the song files, i.e., Otis Redding as the Artist on a Radiohead track. Or another groups cover for a Beatles album. I have a large library and have gone through slowly and fixed many things, but it is still quite messy and a huge bummer.. As a proud new owner of a Late 2011 MacBook Pro, I would love to be able to have a solution for this as well.
    TIA

    Well I just went through the same thing. I had a Lacie Porsche mobile drive at 80GB and changed to a Lacie Rugged 250. I keep all my music on external never local. Not a fan of loading my laptop. Anyways.... I was getting those same errors. I had copied all the itunes library contents from the Porsche drive to the Rugged drive. It took quite some time to transfer so you knew it was working. Then changed in the preferences of iTunes to save in the Rugged drive. If you trashed or deleted any files from the new drive and just put them in the trash without emptying you get that 501 trashes path. I found I had multiple duplicates of songs with the name of the song followed by a 1.mp4a. I think the library.xml file is the key to a clean transfer of music. I think this file is stored locally in your user folder and then it's used to direct to the alternate drive but from what I've read it's the file with all the playlist information and stuff on it. If you find it and move it over to the mobile drive then hold option and boot up itunes then tell it to look for that file on the new mobile I think you'll have no worries. I'm actually gonna try this myself.
    You don't want to know how it got it working. I physically opened every music file on the rugged drive to make sure the were all where they were supposed to be. All 70'gb's of music. Never doing that again.

  • Corrupted file structure in iPhoto library?

    This is a little like the "disappeared library" problem that someone else reported, but my library looks OK. It's just that several years worth of photos have disappeared (i.e. folders show as empty).
    A quick check into the library folder suggests that originals and modifieds are still there. There seems to be a "disconnect" in linking the library structure to the contents.
    As with the other guy, I wouldn't want to restore everything one roll at a time and rebuild my folders.
    I have daily backups (using Backup). 10 days ago everything was fine; but if I do a Restore from 15 days ago, I get a successful restore msg, but nothing has changed. Maybe there are bugs in Backup too. You put some faith in Backup working, but I've had Restoring problems with Backup of Mail files as well in the past.
    I'm no expert at this sort of thing, but it might be helpful to just know what the iPhoto file structure is supposed to look like. Then maybeI could try to restore specific items on a trial-and-error basis.

    Thanks for the prompt reply, TD...
    You've come close to describing my situation, but I don't see the solution.
    In my case I have the following in my iPhoto folder (quite similar to your list...
    In my case I have folders labelled 2001 through 2007 in my Originals folder, and the same for Modified, although oddly enough there's no 2002. It's possible that I didn't make mods for that full year, but doubtful.
    If this is the case you have nothing to worry about.
    In earlier versions of iPhoto the folder structure
    was based in Date. With v6 a new structure was
    created:
    Originals are the photos as they were
    downloaded from your camera or scanner.
    (ii) Modified contains edited pics, shots that
    you have cropped, rotated or changed in any way.
    This allows the Photos -> Revert to Original command
    - very useful if you don't like the changes you've
    made.
    (iii) Data holds the thumbnails the the app
    needs to show you the photos in the iPhoto Window.
    OK, you've explained that well, but here is the real problem. If I can call that thing on the left of my screen a Table of Contents, I have folders labelled by year, Last 6 rolls, Last 18 months and dozens that I have created myself... plus some slide shows. That whole structure seems intact from the way I left it before things went wrong.
    The issue is that it's the most recent years.. 2006, 2007 have (0) beside them and don't show any photos when clicked on. The same is true of all of the folders (albums) I've created with pictures from those years.
    I can see from a file listing of 2006/2007 that I have 3GB of photos in Originals and another 1 GB on Modified. Sampling the photos in Preview shows that they're OK as far as I can tell. What I'm calling the Table of Contents simply isn't accessing them.
    Hopefully you have a simpler solution for me, but what would happen if I did an import on the 2006 and 2007 files? I suppose the 100 or so albums I've created would all have to be created???
    And, I still don't understand why my Backup Restore isn't recreating what I had working fine just 10 days ago.

  • File structure iPhoto

    Hello forum,
    is there by any chance sombody reading this forum who might be able to tell whether there is even the slightes chance that iPhoto would change its file structure in order to keep my own finder file structure?
    iPhoto would be perfect if it would simple scan any folder I tell it too (similar like googles picasa) AND offer the possibility to archive my pictures on DVD/CD ROM, keeping a thumbnail of each archived picture with the information of the new location of the original file (like iView does)
    Now I'm actually considering switching to iView, allthough I will miss the red eye reduction of iPhoto....
    Any good news out there?
    Or anyone sharing my point of view?
    Thanks,
    Petra

    PetraVM:
    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Unfortunately you can't mirror your folder system exactly in iPhoto. Each folder or group of files you import will be placed in a roll. If imported from a folder the roll will have the same title as that folder.
    You can, however, create folders in the Source pane to hold other folders and albums like this (folders can contain other folders and/or albums, slideshows, etc. but albums can only contain photos). That can, if desired somewhat mirror you folder system.
    If you use iPhoto's alias system you can keep your source files in any folder system you'd like in any location you'd like and have just alias files in the library folder. See Tutorial #2. You'll still be limited to the rolls system of iPhoto but your source files will be in your own folder system.
    Regarding redeye removal, have you tried iView's editor. Although requiring more steps it does a very good job. iView's versions control also lets you have multiple edited versions of the same image file. I use both on the same set of source files. iPhoto for books, calendars, etc. and iView for organizing and general image management.
    Do you Twango?

  • Library File Structure Problem

    I have 3 partitions setup on my computer, one running OSX, one for WinXP and another FAT32 partition I use to store data which is used by both operating systems. I recently copied my music library to this partition and set iTunes to use this partition (and subsequent sub-folder) as the primary location for my music library. While I am now able to enjoy my music library in OSX and WinXP I encountered a few problems.
    1)The file structure for itunes with album art, separate folders for music, film, podcasts etc... did not transfer from it's original location in "My Documents\My Music" to the new location. As a result, whenever I download anything like a podcast or video it gets placed in the music section in iTunes which makes organizing and effectively browsing my library difficult. I am tempted to simply copy the original files to my new partition and then manually reorganize it. However, I'm worried it will have no effect on itunes and new downloads will still get misfiled regardless of file type or worse, I might render the library completely unplayable.
    2) While most of my music is accessible to both Windows and OSX, occasionally I go to play a song in OSX and recieve an error message saying that the file cannot be located. If I manually search for the file it has no problem playing it. However, once I switch back to windows I encounter the same problem there. If I don't locate the file in OSX, it plays perfectly in WinXP. I have not switched the location of the file or any other related directories. Presently, a number of my songs remain unplayable in OSX as to not disrupt Window's ability to access all of my music.
    Any assistance in ironing out these kinks would be greatly appreciated, thanks.

    Anybody have any suggestions?

  • Reversing iTunes organized file structure

    Help!
    I just imported my entire music library and had checked "keep iTunes music folders organized" under preferences. In my "my music" folder I had my songs named artist - title (Johnny Cash - Ring of Fire)and now iTunes renamed all the songs by track number and created about 200 different folders. That same song is now under a Johnny Cash folder named "07 Ring of Fire". Is there any possible way to reverse this? Do I need to manually rename all my songs back to their orignal name? Please help!

    Hi
    Facing a similar problem since i-tunes 5.xx (also with 6.01): The file structure is still the same as before and ok but the library shows all songs, that have been ripped as "wav" files not correct. The only information given is now under "title" eg 01 American Idiot. No Album, no Band is shown anymore. All files ripped as mp3-files are shown properly. Deleting the entire library and re-importing brings no cure. Please help.

  • Frustrated with file structure

    Back in the day, Aperture would create an "Aperture Library" file and throw all of my photos into the library. Well that was horrible. It made iPhoto look brilliant, because you could simply organize your photos in folders by date. However iPhoto would create proxies (small files for thumbnails) and throw a ton of additional little files into directories and gummed up the whole works.
    So Aperture 1.5 appeared to have solved all this, going to a more logical date/file structure format. But I was looking through my hard drive, trying to dump all of my photos off to an external drive for space savings and I'm noticing there are still Aperture library files.
    I'm not certain what I'm looking at. Some of my photos appear in directories on the hard drive. Others seem to be jammed into the Aperture library folder. Where do the files really exist, and if I have multiple library files on other drives, how can I get everything synced up?
    I like the interface on Aperture, but the file structure seems really illogical. Is there a better management tool anyone would care to recommend?

    You're not really supposed to poke around the Aperture file structure - leave it to Aperture to manage. this is especially true if you're not familiar with how it works.
    The files in folders on your hard drive are referenced masters; the files in the Aperture Library are either Managed Masters or Versions (note: versions do not exist as actual image files).
    Having Aperture manage your photos is so fundamental to Aperture's raison-d'etre, that if you don't like it, you should use something else (which I guess is what you're looking for recommendations for).
    As an aside, there is a good reason for having Aperture manage your files - there is a potentially complicated relationship between masters and versions, the albums and slide shows etc that they appear in, that it takes a database to keep track of all of this. If you start moving bits around without telling the DBM (and I'm not saying that you are), don't complain if things break.
    You'll find the same approach in large IT companies, managing large volumes of source code - on no account can you update code outside of the source management application. If you do, other bits of related source code may not be re-compiled etc when they should be and your production system comes crashing down.
    Regards,
    Steve

  • Hi, I've lost all song data ( besides song name) on 1,100 WAV files. Does anyone know an app or fix that can identify Album & Artist (& maybe album art) on these files? Thanks

    Hi, I've lost all song data ( besides song name) on 1,100 WAV files. Does anyone know an app or fix that can identify Album & Artist (& maybe album art) on these files? Thanks
    Dermot

    Hi John,
    A major drawback with using wav for storage is that it doesn't carry a tag. This means that in the event of a corrupted library the only information remaining is the filename. Other data may be stored in the path but iTunes doesn't know how to get it. I understand that you need this format for your workflow with Diamond Cut, but that makes it all the more important that you backup your iTunes database on a regular basis.
    Provided that you still have the tracks in their artist and album folders and haven't let iTunes "reorganise" them you should be able to restore some useful metadata using my script TagFromFilename. The script reads the path and filename, and provided these are in the normal layout of <Path>\<Artist>\<Album>\## <Name>.<Ext> can restore Artist, Album Artist, Track Name and Track Number. If your files have a different but predicatable layout with the same information, e.g. the data is all in the filename, then I could create a suitable version of the script to get the data into iTunes. I recommend you disable both the Keep... and Copy... options in iTunes advanced preferences before adding files to the iTunes database. Ideally you also want a complete backup of your correctly structured folders in case you need to pull copies back from it.
    As stated earlier, uninstalling iTunes before the upgrade wouldn't have helped. The crucial thing before any upgrade is to backup all user data from the drive that will be wiped. Typically the iTunes database lives in C:\Users\<User>\Music\iTunes on Vista or Windows 7. The crucial file is called iTunes Library.itl. You seem fairly certain that you don't have a backup database that you could restore but an exhaustive search of your hard drive for files of the form *.itl might still be worth doing. If you find any apart from the active library we can discuss how you open them to see if they are useful.
    tt2
    PS The entire message in bold thing is a bit "shouty".

  • Adust feature not working follow up Question/ lost album folders!

    I tried trashing my iphoto plist from preferences and now have lost all my album folders which have very important projects sets I'm working on. I didn't empty the trash so I still have the folder but putting it back didn't seem to work. Is there a way to get my albums back. Help please! It's kind of important for me.

    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
    Do you Twango?
    MBP 2.16Ghz; G5 Dual Core 2GHz, 2G RAM ea, 250G HD; G4 Dual 1Ghz, 1.5G RAM;   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   22" LCD, 710G FW HDs, Canon: SD700IS/i850/LIDE 50, Epson R200, 30G iPod, 2G Nano

  • File structure and hierarchy in Aperture.

    Hi, everyone.
    I am trying to import folders with images into Aperture and, much to my surprise, have found that this process is everyting but intuitive and straightforward.
    My library (outside of Aperture) is made up of folders each corresponding to a day and location. These folders are labeled using the data and location as part of their name.
    As I try to import these folders into Aperture I can't seem to import them into a single folder or project as sub-folders or sub-domains of that project. I have tried to create a project and them import the folders into it but Aperture won't import them into that project and doesn't allow me to drag and drop it either once it has been imported. I also tried to create albums and folders but haven't been successful.
    How does this file structure in Aperture work in terms of hierarchy ? It certainly isn't structured the way the Finder is or any other file system I have seen to date. Creating folders, organizing them and bringing any type of data into these folders should be a simple process but in Aperture it doesn't seem to be.
    Am I doing something wrong or is Aperture trying to re-invent the wheel ?
    Is there any tutorial I can watch or read on how to work with Aperture's file structure and import folders and folders into it ?
    Thank you in advance.

    Regarding your specific problem I suggest treating each existing dated folder of image files as a single Project in Aperture. In Aperture a Project is a specific time-based concept that may or may not jive with what you previously considered a project. For instance I may have in my mind that shooting all the highest peaks in every state is a "project," but that would be inappropriate as an Aperture Project. Instead each peak might be a Project, but the pix of all the peaks would be pointed to as an Album.
    The way I look at it conceptually:
    Aperture is a database (DB), and each image file lives in one Project.
    Albums are just collections of Pointers that point to individual image files living in one or more Projects. Since they just contain pointers, albums can be created or deleted at will without affecting image files. Very powerful. And Albums of pointers take up almost zero space, so they are fast and do not make the Library size grow.
    Keywords can be applied to every image separately or in batches. Keywords are hugely powerful and largely obviate the need for folders. Not that we should never use folders, just that we should use folders only when useful organizationally - - after first determining that using keywords and albums is not a better approach.
    As one example imagine the keyword "flowers."  Every image of a 100,000 images Library that has some flowers in it has the keyword flowers. Then say we want to put flowers in an ad, or as background for a show of some kind, or to print pix for a party, or even just to look for an image for some other reason. We can find every flower image in a 100k-image database in 2 seconds, and in another few seconds create an Album called "Flowers" that points to all of those individual images.
    Similarly all family pix can have a keyword "family" and all work pix can have a key word "work." Each individual pic may have any number of keywords. Such pic characteristics (work, family, flowers, etc.) should not be organized via folders.
    So by using keywords and albums we can have instant access to every image everywhere, very cool. And keywords and albums essentially take up no space in the database.
    Another approach is to use a folder "Family" for family pix, a folder "Flowers" for flowers pix and another folder "Work" for work pix. IMO such folders usage is a very poor approach to using an images database (probably stemming from old paper or film work practices). Note that one cannot put an image with family in a field of flowers at a work picnic in all three folders; but it is instant with keywords.
    HTH
    -Allen

  • How to create a simple File structure for a large project?

    Hi to all,
    I've own and operated my own website design/development (a 1 woman office, plus many sub-contractors) over the period of 8 years. I started hand-coding HTML sites in 1997, before the creation DW (though I think the first ver was for Mac in '97). Over the recent years I've udated my skills to include CSS and enough Java/PHP to customize and/or troubleshoot current projects (learn as I go).
    The majority of my clients have been other 1-10 person entrepreneur companies. I've recently won a bid to redesign a government site which consist of 30 departments, including their main site.
    The purpose of this thread is to get some ideas on creating a file management/structure. Creating file management setup for smaller companies was a piece of cake, using a simple file mgmt structure within DW. Their current file structure is all over the place. I've read about a very good, simple file struture in a DW CS4 manual and wanted to get feedback on different methods that have worked, and have not worked, or your client:
    Here's my thinking:
    1. within the root dir place home.htm and perhaps a few .htm related only to home
        2. create the following folders off the root, "docs, imgs/global, CSS, FLA, Departments"
                - sub folders within docs for each dept
                - site wide css's placed into CSS
                - site wide FLAs into the FLA
                - sub-folders created within 'imgs' for each dept, including a 'global folder' for sitewide images and menu imgs (if needed)
    - OR -
    1. create same file structure for each dept folder, such as 'imgs/CSS/FLA/Docs'
    Open for suggestions....
    Ciao

    It is a problem I have thought over at length and still feel what I use could be better. You are doing it the right way around researching before you start, as moving files once things are underway can course real problems. One issue is the use of similar assets across site(s), and version control if you have multiple versions of the same asset.
    Can not say I have built a site(s) of that size but would recommend putting together a flow chart to help visualise the structure and find out better ways organising (works for me). Good luck, post back with your solution.

  • Moving file structure to a new disk

    I am trying to move my catalog and photo files from one disk that is running out of space to another drive. I have tried all the obvious like backing up and restoring to another disk which created the catalog file as well as the file structure but when I open the new catalog it still points to the old file structure. I am using Elements 3.0.
    Any Ideas? It is important for me to maintain the original folder structure since I think some filenames are the same.Also it is important for me to maintain all my tagging inof.
    Thanks

    I have tried all the obvious like backing up and restoring to another disk which created the catalog file as well as the file structure but when I open the new catalog it still points to the old file structure. I am using Elements 3.0. 
    Any Ideas? It is important for me to maintain the original folder structure since I think some filenames are the same.Also it is important for me to maintain all my tagging inof.
    Are you sure you opened the new catalog?
    What happens if you just move all the folders to the new disk in Windows, and then change the drive letter so that (for example) if the old drive was D:, then the new drive becomes D: ??

Maybe you are looking for

  • Purchase order and MIP selection

    Hi All, I have a requirement, please expalain whether it is possible or not in SAP? The Material is updated with the quality view and also have the MIP with diff.MICs. Say the effective date is 15.10.2010.So if the purchase order has been generated o

  • How to handle special characters in metadata?

    I have an implementation in C# to call ACS webservices for a long time. Last week we realized that some special characters in metadata fields are making the package request to not work. Example characters: éë. The response from ACS contains E_ADEPT_D

  • CRM 5.0 to CRM 7.0

    Hi Guys, We are planning to upgrade CRM 5.0  to CRM 7.0 ICSS and E-commerce Applications. ICSS has high level of customization and E-commerce B2B has low level of customization. Please suggest what approach should be followed to move the Java Applica

  • Shockwave doesn't work on firefox under linux mint 17, qiana

    I use Firefox 33.0 Mozilla Firefox for linux Mint: mint - 1.0 I use linux mint 17, qiana. Cinnemon, 32-bit. As extensions for Firefox I use Adblock Plus 2.6.6. As plugins I use: DivX webplayer 1.4.0.233, Iced-Tea webplugin 1.5, OPenH264 video codec p

  • Lumia 920 clock will not auto adjust to operator t...

    I have a 920 Lumia and the date / time function is set to ON for 'set automatically'. I just travelled from the UK to Belguin and the clock updated to the Belgian time zone and time. I have been back two days in the UK and it's still stuck on Belgian