Album Order Changed

Hey everybody,
I own every season and episode of The Office, and after the update, the order of shows, for season one as an example, reads not 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, but 2, 6, 4, 5, 3, 1.
I can't fix the problem.. I'm having a lot of trouble. This occurs several times throughout my library now. How do i fix it?
Thanks!

How the photos are displayed on the iPad is a matter for the iPad. I'd ask that on the iPad forum.

Similar Messages

  • How can I get iTunes to display the tracks from a CD in their original (album) order?

    To be absolutely honest, I don't really understand what this box is for, so I shall just use it to repeat and expand on my question. (I have already sent a "Feedback" comment on the same topic).
    How can I get iTunes to display the tracks from a CD in their original (album) order?
    It seems to me that there is something very basic wrong with the way iTunes handles CD Tracks.
    Professionally produced CD tracks are seldom if ever in a randomised order. Why then does iTunes seem unable to display the tracks in the order they appear on the original CD source - whether from a personally owned CD or from a download from the iTunes Store?
    Some music demands a specific, non-alphabetic sequence in order to make sense. Why does it seem that iTunes only offers Alphabetic, or reverse alphabetic order - both of which make a nonsense of the original, often intended order of tracks?
    Why not replace the so-called "cover-art" in the bottom left hand corner if the iTunes window - which, while it may look attractive to some, gives the barest of information concerning the original disc, with a list of the original CD tracks in their original order, so that the user can easily reestablish the order in which they should be played.
    As I would expect legibility might be a problem with doing this, why could not the original contents, (in their original order), at least, be displayed when the "cover art" is double clicked-on - the result of which at present gives me an enlarged version of the "Cover Art". While on the subject of the contents of the source disc, what about all the album notes which someone takes trouble to write in order to increase the appreciation of the music on the CD and the listener's general background knowledge of the artists involved. Such notes, it seems to me, have considerable intrinsic value in their own account. I would, I think, normally be prepared to buy such "Sleeve notes" - so long as a "taster" was supplied (as it is for the music) - for something like the cost of a single 'Tune" on iTunes.
    These two aspects let Apple iTunes down enormously, in my opinion. I think that by chopping even quite protracted sequences of music up into bits does no one any favours - except perhaps Apple's already quite substantial bank balance. People have to be aware that two and a half, to three and a half minutes is a very short time to develop a piece of worthwhile music, and that there are many, many composers, not all of whom are alive today who have written music that huge masses of mankind value for the enrichment of their lives and the human condition in general.
    Please make the viewing of iTunes tracks in their correct order by default possible. By all means have the alphabetical variations available as offering a different approach to the music, but not the sole approach to it - PLEASE.
    Frustratedly yours
    Alan Whitaker
    PS I work at my old 24" iMac Intel Core 2 machine which runs OS "Tiger" - because it is more beautiful to look at, the screen is more pleasant to work on, and because, in some ways it is more capable (it will run FreeHand MX without needing a "patch"), than my more recent 21.5" which runs "Snow Leopard". (I don't find it that much slower, either).

    Dear Mike
    Thanks for the support. I am utterly amazed that after all the hype about how good iTunes is that it cannot play a downloaded CD in the correct order, and that what that order should be is not available directly from within one's own iTunes installation. (I know that one can go back to the iTunes Store to check what the order should be, but having downloaded the tracks surely iTunes is clever enough to retrieve this important information.
    My iTunes to differ from yours in that I have also noticed that it seems unable to download copies of my "talking books" in the correct order either. But in my case it downloads them - from a CD - in order, but with the first track downloaded first - so that it appears at the bottom of the column of tracks so that it would get played last! (At least this is, while being inexplicable, a relatively "logical" bit of blundering and because of this is relatively easy to put right!).
    I like many genres of music, some of which are not really programmed except perhaps by the artist performing them. I know that Frank Sinatra was very careful to programme his album songs to obtain a particular effect and in relation to the keys of the music. iTunes presumes to know better.
    Film scores may be totally randomly put together, in some cases, but in others the order is vital to one's appreciation of the music as a whole and how it relates to the plot of the film.
    In symphonic music most works are divided into sections and are conceived by the composer that way. Some individual sections may gain a life of their own if played separately, but they are never complete in the sense that the composer envisaged them without being placed in their proper context.
    Opera and probably most choral music too, is similar except that the words may well become meaningless if the order is changed at the whim of a piece of ill-written computer code, while ballet music has to be heard totally within its sequential context or it becomes meaningless.
    Finally, I would venture that iTunes, by jumbling up the order of the tracks as recorded on a CD, does an immense disservice, not only to the music on a particular CD, but to music in general, by expressing everything in terms of "Songs" - which it seems to interpret as stand-alone items of between 2 and 4 minutes whatever the genre. Even the way the iTunes publicity speaks of how many "songs" it can store instead of how many minutes or hours of recorded sound. This has to be another brick in the wall of "dumming-down" of people's expectations, and the shortening of their attention spans.
    I don't know about anyone else, but I feel betrayed by Apple over this. Perhaps the look, feel and general presentation of an item are not the most desirable features of a consumer product. Maybe it should be judged more on it fitness for the purpose for which it was sold. There is one other possibility - that Apple are trying to redefine "Music" - and that everything that lasts longer than about 3.5 minutes or is in the form of what could for want of a better term be called symphonic in the broadest sense is something else - not "Music" within Apple's new definition, at all!
    Well that's off my chest! now I can get down to creating some sort of order in my iTunes Libraries, knowing that I have to reconsult all the sources in order to confirm the source playing order.
    Anyway thanks again. At least I know that it is not just me
    alanfromthatcham

  • How can I play multiple albums from same artist in album order on iPhone 4?

    Just purchased an iPhone 4 from Verizon. When I select an Artist and then choose "All Songs", the only choice I am provided is to play the songs in alphabetic order. I would prefer to play them in the original album order. Is there a setting that can be changed to accomplish this?

    For those who arrive here later than this answer, the app is now called "Continue" & is available free with addware or paid without.

  • I have 278 photos in Photoshop Elements 13 that I want to upload in album order to Shutterfly for a book.

    I am using Photoshop Elements 13 and Windows 8.1.  I have my photos in album order and I want to load them in this order.  When I try to load them to the Cloud they become disorganized.  I can not find a way to upload them to Shutterfly to make a book.  Is there a way to do this?

    This is a two part process. First we title the photos, then we export them, using the title as filename.
    To title them
    Once you have then in the order you want select them all and go
    Photos -> Batch Change. Select set 'Title' to 'Text'
    Choose a Title -> Graduation 2013 or whatever, then check the box at 'Append number to each photo.
    Now, in the Album all your photos are named... Graduation 001, 002, 003 etc
    Next Export them:
    File -> Export, and in the Name option, choose 'Title as Filename' and complete the export.
    Regards
    TD

  • How can I save the order of photos in albums? Even though I have set as album order they revert back

    How can I save the order of photos in albums in Elements 11? Even though I have set as album order they revert back to original order.

    Could you confirm that when you re-open the sorted album, the display order on the top bar just over the browsing space is still in 'album' order ? That order may have been changed to a date order. For me, I get the order of the last album I opened, not necessarily the 'album' order of the present album.

  • Album order: missing track #

    I have about 7300 songs in my iTunes library. Most of these I imported from the original CD using the "Get CD Track Names" to fill in the song names, etc. About two thirds of my songs have no Track Number saved (if you Get Info on a track, the little box is empty). The problem is that since upgrading to 7.6, the albums that don't have track numbers don't play in the correct order, and there doesn't appear to be a way to sort them in their original album order. In previous versions of iTunes, the tracks were in the correct order if I sorted by album or artist. My questions are:
    1. Why did this change in 7.6?
    2. How did previous versions know the order in which to play songs on an album? Is that information saved in the iTunes .xml file or someplace like that?
    3. Is there a way to fix this without manually adding track numbers to 5,000+ songs?

    Not as yet, but some people have found that re-encoding them to a different file format has helped - but only in a limited few cases.
    Remember that (in my view) iTM's primary raisin d'être is to make your music available from your computer to your iOS device so it doesn't matter if any music is matched - it's just available to your iOS device in it's current format as with manual syncing.
    Of course in reality many people were hoping for more and I understand the frustration with this. For example I was hoping iTM would fix all my id3 tags so I could harmonise my 4 'puters libraries but that ain't gonna happen.
    Regards,
    Shawn

  • Track order changing on ipod since updating to itunes7

    after upgrading to itunes7, i updated my ipod, to find that on some of my albums the track order had changed. for example, track 7 would be before track 1.
    i dont understand why its happening, as the track order on my itunes library is correct.
    someone had a similar problem with track order changing but it was happening to their itunes library. heres the link for that http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=663895&tstart=15
    i left a post on that thread to see if i get any replies from that.
    i use windows xp and have a fat colour display ipod.
    can anyone help me out?
    thanx

    I'm experiencing the same issue: iTunes (7.0.1.8) OK, iPod (5th gen) some albums messed up. Checked album settings, e.g. 'Artist', 'Album artist', 'track numbers' and reimported album, etc., however, so far unsatisfactorily. Did you manage to solve the problem?

  • Photo order changes when burn CD

    I created iPhoto album in a certain order. When I burn CD the order changes, seemingly randomly. The order of the show is important. How do I prevent this? Thank you, MP

    The order is probably alpha-numeric, based on the File Name of the photos. iPhoto allows you to change the photo's title, but to change the file name you must export a copy outside of iPhoto.
    Select your album. Then export to a desktop folder, with "use album name" checked. If your album is named "Winter" then the photos will be names "Winter 01," "Winter 02," etc. Your order should be preserved.
    If your photo titles are important, you could pad the beginning of each title with a numeral. Then export with "use title" checked, and the file name will become the photo's title.

  • When I import an album into ITunes...it puts the song list in alphabetical order.  How do I get it to import the album order?

    Any suggestions on how I can import an album without the songs going to alphabetical order?  The last few times I have imported....I cannot get the play list to come up in the album order.

    Hi there,
    I'm having the same problem as this original post but reading the reply/answer i stil have no idea what has gone wrong or how to rectify it?
    Never had a problem for years untill now.
    Any other things this could be?
    Thanks
    Paul

  • Report for Sales Order Change History   CDPOS and CDHDR

    How to take a report of the data for the Sales Order Change history for a particular period of time. It is required to take a report of all the Sales Orders for which the basic price has been changed. Please let me know the procedure. I could not get the data from the table CDPOS and CDHDR
    Helpful answer would be rewarded.
    Regards
    Praveen

    Dear Praveen Kumar
    Have you tried with VBAP where sale order details at item level would be stored.
    Moreover, to my knowledge, there won't be any changes as for as pricing is concerned at sale order level but there is at billing level.  Normally, any price increase / decrease would reflect in billing.  So why dont you to table join through SQVI VBAP (for sale order details) and VBRP (for billing details) so that you can compare the selling price in sale order with billing. 
    Thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Sale Order changes View

    Dear Guru's
    Is there any T-Code for verifying Sale Order changes (Step wise), as in my company Invoices are generated with lot of changes which not matching with Sale Order conditions. So I would like to moniter the Sale Order conditions changes. Kindly help me out.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi
    Sales order changes can be seen in the report only if the changes are made by any user(userid). If your problem is with changes in pricing conditons...then before comparing the sales orders and invoices, I advise you to check the copy controls and the price type used in the copy controls. If the price type selected is to redetermine the pricing, then you should check the validity of the conditon records. Sometimes, the conditon records may be different during sales order creation and invoice creation.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Sale Order change BAPI - Storage loc not updated

    Hi Everybody,
    Iam using "BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE", to change the sale order items.
    First iam calling above bapi with switch B, for new pricing & then second time for material change.
    When i change any material number, it is getting updated correctly.
    But the storage location, even though iam passing in the bapi it is not updated, & is blank - updation flag is also passed.
    When i execute sale order change again it is updated - ie, for any material change for first bapi call, storage loc is not updated - for 2nd bapi call storage loc is updation - for same input in both the cases.
    Is there any way to update the storage loc is first call of sales order change bapi.
    Below is the parameters iam passing in bapi :
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'
        EXPORTING
          SALESDOCUMENT      = LS_SALESDOCUMENT
          ORDER_HEADER_IN    = LT_HEADER_IN
          ORDER_HEADER_INX   = LT_HEADER_X
        TABLES
          RETURN                            = LT_RETURN
          ORDER_ITEM_IN               = LT_ITEMS
          ORDER_ITEM_INX             = LT_ITEM_X
          ORDER_CFGS_REF          = LT_CFGS_REF
          ORDER_CFGS_INST         =  LT_PARTS
          ORDER_CFGS_VALUE     = LT_VALUES
          ORDER_CFGS_BLOB        = LT_CUBLOB
          ORDER_CFGS_VK            = LT_CUVK
          ORDER_CFGS_REFINST   = LT_CUREF
          SCHEDULE_LINES            = LT_SCHEDULE_L
          SCHEDULE_LINESX         = LT_SCHEDULE_X
          ORDER_TEXT                   = LT_TEXT
          CONDITIONS_IN                = LT_CONDITION_L
          CONDITIONS_INX              = LT_CONDITION_X.
    Any help is appreciated.
    Regards,
    Nagarajan.J

    Hi,
    Storage location is updated only when same sale order bapi is called another time with required details.
    rgs,
    Nagarajan J

  • How to add media in the album order?

    I spent some time to organize the media in Organizer album, but when I open the album to add my media, it appears to be mixed. Is there the way to keep it in the album order?

    Seems like this question was posted some time ago, and no one ever replied. So my reply is probably of little use, but I'll post it anyway. When you are viewing the Album components in the PSE Organizer, I assume you are viewing them in the sequence you want to load them on the PRE timeline.
    If that is the case, by selecting all of the clips/images, and the clicking on Edit > Video Editor at the bottom of the window should open the clips/images in the same order they appear in the Album.

  • Sales Orders Change Log question

    Hi All,
    I am currently working on a project that involves querying SAP Database to get custom reports via web browser, I've made a lot of advances and most of the site is ready but I'm missing just one item that I hope you could help me.
    Thing is I am working with the Sales Order change log and the problem comes one a user deletes a row. If I go to the change log inside SAP and see the differences a new record will be shown saying that row X was deleted and
    if I go to the database (ADOC and ADO1 tables) I don't have a way to see wich row was deleted.
    My way of doing this is to check for the number of rows on the current state of the sales order and check the same on the previous instance of the SO and see if a line was deleted. Then I would have to check row by row between instances what rows are there and what row is missing and store that info. I think this kind of approach will definitively kill the server.
    I was wondering if some one can give me a hint about how to approach this problem. Does any body know how SAP works on this area?
    I'm working with SAP2005A and SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!
    Alejandro.-

    Hola Alejandro,
    Thanks for your answer, as I see it I'm doing exactly what you proposed but the problem comes with the following scenarios:
    a.- If I post a new SO with two lines I will have on the ADO1 table two records with the values 0 and 1 for each line respectively but if I delete the item on LineNum = 1 and then I add a new item, this last item will be also created with LineNum value = 1. This is not a complicated thing to do but the problem comes when the user is used to work with SOs with several items at detail level and is used to add and erase lines once in a while and as I see it it's very difficult for me to track those specific changes. There's also the fact that on the Log table a new instance is created every time the user hits the update button regardless if a modification was actually made or not. I mean I would know that a line was deleted or added but I would have to start comparing each field on each line of a sales order with it's previous instance to check what was actually added/deleted and I'm afraid that this may affect the server performance. I know that SAP does this without affecting to much the system resources and that is what I'm trying to find.
    I forgot the other scenario I was considering he he I will post again as soon as I remember it but I hope I'm explaining this ok (I'm not very good at explaining...) If not let me know and I'll try to explain again.
    I'm also working on trying to get another approach to see what comes up...
    Thanks for checking this thread, your answers are helpful.
    Regards.

  • Calling a Sales Order Change BAPI in a Sales Order Exit

    Functional Requirement:
    While creating a Sales Order with Reference to another Sales Order, on saving the new sales order, change something in the referenced sales order.
    I am trying to achieve the same by doing the following:
    In the standard SAP user exit called during saving the new sales order USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT I am calling the BAPI BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE on the referenced Sales Order.
    However the BAPI is unable to change the other sales order giving an error Enter the document number. I am specifying the Document Number while calling the BAPI, so I know that is not the error.
    I just wish to know whether it is technically possible to call a BAPI to update another Sales Order while we are currently saving one Sales Order.

    Hi Girish,
    If it works correctly when run seperately and you are sure the data passed into the BAPI is exactly the same then it may be something like table locks or similar causing your original problems...
    What about packaging up your working Z program into a custom function module and calling that from within USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT as a seperate task (IN NEW TASK) and building in a slight delay of say 5 seconds at the start of your code?
    I'll be honest, this isn't an ideal solution but might be sufficient to resolve your issues.  I'd be inclined to see if you could just run your Z program as a background process every 5 minutes or so to capture any changes and perform updates but if this is a no no from your functional people I'm not sure what else to suggest sorry.  I've never personally had to update a document from within the save routine of another document so can't give any advice based on my own experiences sorry.
    Gareth.

Maybe you are looking for