ALE - Distribution Error

Hello Experts,
I need to add an extension in MATMAS. I created an extension and added to message type Z_MATMAS. Here, my partner system is Siebel. I added Z_MATMAS under one Model View and Generated the partner profile and saved.
Here, the problem is, when I try to distribute the model view in BD64, I am getting an error says that u201CCommunication error occurred Function. MODEL_VIEW_REPLICATE is not availableu201D
And If I try to send a material in BD10 using Z_MATMAS as message type, It is throwing an error says "Message type Z_MATMAS does not exist"
Any idea.. what may be the problem..?

Hi Gautham.
Target system is Non-SAP system. ie. SIEBEL. I can't create the Z message type in the target system. What do you suggest?

Similar Messages

  • ALE distribution error - 0 communication IDOC

    Hello,
    We are getting 0 communication IDOC generated for message type DOCMAS error for ALE document distribution error. Please advice where to look for the error.
    Anirudh

    hi,
    ani,
    u check this,
    If you want work items to be created when errors occur for the purpose of error handling, you need to assign the standard task TS40007915 PCROLL to a position or a workflow organizational unit.
    Or
    You can also distribute dependent objects manually for classes. You can use report program RCCLDIHI to distribute a complete class hierarchy including all classes characteristics, and characteristic values.
    Only the message code (004 - change) is allowed for sending a document (message type DOCMAS). This function also creates the document in the target system.
    You can control the sending of documents with the indicator Distribution lock. An object with this indicator in its status will not be distributed into other ALE systems.
    You can set the indicator in Customizing Document Management System  Define document type  Define status. The distribution lock is read when a distribution automatically starts after a change pointer is set or for an Integrated Distributed PDM Solution (ID PDM).
    You can ignore this setting by starting the distribution manually. When you set the indicator Ignore distribution lock in the initial screen, then all documents will be distributed overriding the previously set status.
    You control the distribution of object links with the indicator You cannot maintain the object links via ALE and Object link unchanged in target system.
    Information about object links are distributed through IDoc type DOLMAS01.
    The data is transferred to the workstation application and to storage data in IDoc type DOCMAS04 if an original file exists to a document. The Remote Function Call interface protocol transfers the contents of the original file, for example text or design drawing.
    You can determine whether you want originals of a certain document type to be distributed by ALE into another system under the setting Document Management System  Define document type  Define transport of originals for ALE. You can control distribution with various criteria.
    You want to distribute all original files of the application WRD (Microsoft Word) for the document type R-1 (report) that are stored in vault VAULT1 (Vault for Office Applications). You do not want to distribute documents of the same document type for the application WWI (Winword 6.0).
    You can process the status for the desired objects.
    1.     Select in Customizing Cross Applications Components  Distribution (ALE)  Standard ALE Business Processes  Logistics  Master Data Distribution  Integrated Distributed PDM Solution (ID PDM)  Object status (for example, Define BOM status).
    2.     Process the indicator Distribution lock
    ben

  • File2idoc:Error in ALE distribution model for SendResponse

    Hi,
    I'm using XI to configure a file to idoc scenario.
    Now in WE19 I could see relevant data,but in WE05 it showed the error status 51,and the detail message was "Error in ALE distribution model for SendResponse".
    Do I have to create a distribution model in BD64?I did this ,but failed to create.

    hi,
    i dont think distribution model  is required for inbound case.
    just check the below configuration.
    File To IDOC - Part1 (SLD and Design):
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC&
    File To IDOC - Part2 (Configuration):
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC-Part2+(Configuration)&
    File To IDOC - Part3 (Steps required in XI and R3):
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC-Part3(StepsrequiredinXIandR3)&
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/sapR3%28Idocs%29ToXI--Steps+Summarized&
    chirag

  • Error executing BAPI attached to ALE Distribution Model

    Hi experts,
    I am executing BAPI_EXCHANGERATE_SAVEREPLICA which has been included in an ALE distribution model as I wish to replicate exchange rates from my source client to a number of remote clients.
    When I execute the BAPI I get an information message back in the bapi return code as follows "one table record planned for update". Does anyone know what this means? I would have expected idocs to have been created and sent across to the target clients and for the BAPI to have been executed in the target system but nothing has happened. I have released the method (BAPI) and tried various options on the partner profile but still get the same message returned when I call the BAPI.
    Any help on executing this BAPI via ALE would be much appreciated.
    Thanks
    Adrian

    This is information message that informs you that the selected row may be updated. Then when you call BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT the rows will be updated.

  • ALE distribution model - one message type to more than one recipient

    Hello colleagues,
    currently I'm working on an integration project between one SAP system and an e-shop system. The communication is established through IDOCs ( both inbound and outbound ). There is another system ( POS ) which is already integrated
    with SAP via IDOCs also.
       Now I'm facing the following problem regarding distribution of transactional IDOCs ( orders, deliveries, etc. ): when assigning one message type ( for example DESADV - Delivery: Shipping notification ) to more than one external system in ALE distribution model I receive a message alerting that one message type can be send to only one recipient.
    The distribution model is as follows:
    Model Views
       SAP to POS
          SAPDEV ( the SAP system )
             POS ( the external POS system )
                DESADV
       SAP to E-SHOP
          SAPDEV ( the SAP system )
             E-SHOP ( the external e-shop system )
                DESADV
       Well, the system message is clear and I did the obvious: create a complete copy to the original message type and than assign it to the E-SHOP system ( the original message type is already used in integration between SAP and POS ).
    As you can see I have found a workaround already but I think that it comes natural to SAP to communicate with other systems and to exchange same kind of documents to those systems and I can't believe that there isn't a standard solution for situation like this.
    FYI I'm working on SAP ECC 6.0
    Thanks in advance.
    Wish you nice day and successful week ,
    Vladimir

    I believe when ePrint server has received the email, it made the necessary settings and configured the job for printing and then it went for "Reply All" option. So here it cannot send the print job to your personal email ID and the error came up.
    The only option I can think of is add the printer email ID to your email contact list and give it a name like MyPrinter so you can remember easily , just like email contacts are added in Outlook.
    Mark this post as answered so that others can find it useful.
    Say "Thanks" by clicking the Kudos Star in the post that helped you.
    Please mark the post that solves your problem as "Accepted Solution"

  • ALE Distribution Model

    Hi,
    I've created an ALE distribution model to process the interface concerning Set Up HR and Accounting. Initialy we make it all and distribute it to the receiving system (FI) and it seems to be ok. After that the funcional team generate some movements and the IDOC's were generated but they were not sent to the FI system. We've a look at tRFC and an error concerning user or password invalid appears, so i define again the user comunication and after a few adjustments to the model view we distribute it again to the FI system. When i execute it the following message appears : <b>Model view HRFI-CFP has not been updated / Rreason: Distribution model is currently being processed.
    </b>
    Next step we delete the model view and created it again but the same error still remains.
    Can anyone help me ???
    Thanks is advance.
    JMMatos

    Hi
    Distribution Model – A model that describes the ALE message flow between logical systems.
    Applications and the ALE distribution service layer use the model to determine receivers and to control the data distribution. The relationships between logical systems, message types, BAPI’s and filters are defined in the distribution model.
    Ex: The screen shot depicts customer distribution mode ALE_TRNG_Mar07.
    Sender Logical System – EC1CLNT800
    Receiver Logical System  – SALES
    Message Type – CREMAS
    No filter conditions defined.
    This configuration step allows the installation of core ALE features on which data transfer activity will be based.
    In the distribution model you can specify the messages to be sent to a given logical system. You can also define the conditions for the content and dispatch of messages in the filters.
    The distribution model consists of one or more views that you can define
    After creating the distribution model – the model needs to be distributed to the receiver system.
    Partner profiles need to be generated in both sender and receiver systems using transaction BD82 (automatically) or WE20 (manually).

  • Message type US for ALE distribution

    I want to create an outbound IDOC using ALE distribution.
    I have to assign Partner type as 'US' - user. Can anyone give me some input. I got the error when trying to do the same
    " No partner profiles (message control) maintained                          
    Message no.                             B1127                                                    Diagnosis                                                     No IDOC partner profiles have been created for the message control for
         for application EF, condition key ZNBR and change message '' with     
         partner type 'LS' and partner role '  '.                              
    Procedure                                                     Please create the partner profiles for the logical system that should 
         contain the IDOC. You can either generate them from the ALE model or  
         create them manually.                                                 
    Step by step will be helpfull.
    Thanks

    Hi Preethi,
    You can use this program <b>RBDCUS15</b> to generate outbound partner profile.
    Also you use distribution model (t/code BD64) as well.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Ferry Lianto
    Please reward points if helpful.

  • ALE Distribution for Message Type FIDCC2

    Dear all,
    I would like to confirm my steps below in setting up the ALE distribution of message type FIDCC2, to ensure that I did not do anyhting that impact other company code that already live in the system :-
    1. Use tcode OB87 to add the Global Company Code, XBJ01.
    2. Use tcode OBV7 to link a dummy (non-existence in sending system)
    Chart of Account to the Global Company code XBJ01.
    3. Use tcode OBB5 to assign the Global Company Code, XBJ01, setup in step 1. to the an existing company code BJ01.
    4. Use tcode BD64 to setup a distribution with message type FIDCC2, and
    filter with value XBJ01.
    5. Create an FI document using tcode FB01 with company code BJ01.
    6. IDOC is created successfully with message type FIDCC2.
    Is there above steps correct? As there are times I receive an error message when trying to do a PGI with company code other than BJ01 "F1302 No cross-system company code is defined for company code TR01".
    Another question is, with setting up of FIDCC2 with ALE distribution, any transaction in SAP that will generate a FI document will have IDOC created, right?
    Thank you.
    Best Regards
    Chee Hean

    I don't know if you still have this problem but my team and I faced a similar issue in production. Due to a project we're handling, a tool that we are executing requested us to create a Distribution Model based on FIDCC2. This stuck hundreds of thousands of FI Document. Actually, for any FI document the system generated an FIDCC2 and it's not possible to reuse those IDocs because the FIDCC2 Message Type has a structure completely different from FIDCMT (the original message that the system should generate). We identified all the IDoc that should be generated and re-create the Idocs in the target system and the Idocs we posted correctly. We change the FIDCC2 IDocs status to 62 or 32 (depending if inbound system or outbound system). I recommend to investigate about this message type before use it. This Message Type is stronger than any other message type so it must be filter perfectly otherwise, for sure, problems will appear.
    Regards,
    Hugo

  • How to send the spool output to the specific user during ALE distribution

    Hi All
    In ALE internal order Configuration done by BAPI Method SAVEREPLICA Business object BUS2075whenever user changed the internal order which is moved to the destination system because of change data setting in data element fields.
    I want to know how to send the spool output of the changed internal order to the specific user during ALE distribution.
    Please help me to reslove the above issue
    Thanks & Regards
    KRISHGUNA

    Solved by myself

  • Query related to filter group on matnr created in ALE distribution model

    Hi All,
    I have query related to filter group on matnr created in ALE distribution model.
    I have created a filter group on matnr in ALE distribution model and put the value E*  ( purpose is that all the material number started with E should be triggered in case of any changes in the material).But it is not working.
    <b>Can anybody suggest the solution for this i.e how to capture E* value for the material master changes and should trigger idoc using change pointer using BD21.</b>
    Thanks & Regards
    Prabhat

    Unfortunately, you cannot filter using wildcards or exclusions.  You have to explicitly list each allowed value in its entirety.
    In my opinion, the simplest solution would be to copy function MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_MATMAS, modify it to handle your custom filtering and update the message type entry in transaction BD60.

  • Incorrect distribution -Error while distributing GOA to R3 Backend system

    Hi,
    We have installed SRM server 5.5 and implementing contract Management
    scenario with backend system R/3 4.6B.
    In this scenario we are creating a Global Outline Agreement in SRM
    system and distributing it to the back-end ERP system.
    In SRM5.0 GOA (Trans.type GCTR) that are distributed at Header level
    are failing to distribute to R/3 system v4.6b
    We are getting this error message in SRM transaction SLG1: -
    The error ocurred by processing event RELEASED_NEWLY with GUID
    DCA7101B320134F1949F000347DE470F and object_id= 5600000054 " RECEPIENT
    NOT FOUND"
    The purchasing org , the plant has been mapped .Also vendor & material is maintained for the company & Plant .
    The condition types are mapped in SRM
    Pls suggest.
    Regards,
    Avinash

    Hi Avinash,
    In reference to your query about GOA, the distribution error might be beacause of the issues in BADI implementation.
    By using the BADI you can define which document to be created in the backend.
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE BADI can be used in SRM and BBP_CTR BADI can be used in back end R/3 for this purpose.
    Check for the transaction types (GCTR) and the number ranges for the transaction types.
    The GOA will either create a contract or a Scheduling agreement in R/3 back end after distribution.
    Also refer the below SDN thread in this regard :
    Re: Scheduling Agreement from GOA
    Any further clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for suitable answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • ALE Distribution model customisation question.

    Hi,
    How essential is it to undertake the SRM ALE Distribution model config prior to making the changes to the R/3 backend tables, e.g. CRMCONSUM, CRMPAROLTP, SMOFPARSFA? The SAP SRM config guide does not indicate the whether or not the ALE config needs to be undertaken before or after the R/3 middleware config.
    Please can some one clarify this.
    Thank you.
    Steve,

    Hi Stewe
    ALE Idoc Settings are required for Invoice, Good Receipt and PO Commitment.
    But CRM settings are required for transfering your Business Object and Customizing object.
    Both are not related each other.
    regards
    Muthu

  • Message types for ALE distribution

    Hi,
    I am working on SRM 7.0. I need to copy the org structure from one client to another. For that I am using the ALE distribution model. Can anyone please let me know all the message types reqired for transferring the org structure.
    Thanks,
    Bhakti

    Hi Masa,
    Thanks alot for your help. The document is quite helpful if the org structure had to be mapped from HR. But, the org structure is to be mapped from another existing ERP. Kindly suggest if there is any document for such a transfer.
    Also, I have found another way to transport the org structure. Hopefully that should work. Once I am done testing for the same, I will notify.
    Thanks,
    Bhakti

  • Question regd. ALE distribution

    Hi Experts,
    My client has a requirement for outbound HR interface. The interface basically transfers IDocs from R/3 to XI and from XI to an ftp location A. But the client also want an option to simulate the interface. For the simulation run of the interface, it should transfer IDocs from R/3 to XI and from XI to an ftp location B. In this regard, I wanted to know if there is any elegant solution to work this issue without using different IDoc types for actual and simulation run. The ALE distribution model (R/3->XI) will be same for both the cases but I want to know if there is any simple way that XI could figure out between actual and simulation run.
    Thanks
    Sri

    Hi,
    I will give the following few steps
    1) Tcode BD61---> check the change pointers activated check box
    save and goback.
    2) Tcode BD50---> check the MATMAS check box save and comeback.
    3) Tcode BD51---> goto IDOC_INPUT_MATMAS01 select the checkbox save and comeback.
    4) Tcode BD52---> give message type : matmas press ok button.
    select all what ever you want and delete remaining fields.
    save & come back.
    5) 5) go to Tcode MM02 select one material and try to change the description and save it
    it will effects the target systems material desciption will also changes
    6) goto Tcode SE38 give program Name is : RBDMIDOC and Execute
    give Message type : MATMAS and Executte
    Thanks
    Sarada

  • RE: ALE distribution

    Hi Experts,
    My client has a requirement for outbound HR interface. The interface basically transfers IDocs from R/3 to XI and from XI to an ftp location A. But the client also want an option to simulate the interface. For the simulation run of the interface, it should transfer IDocs from R/3 to XI and from XI to an ftp location B. In this regard, I wanted to know if there is any elegant solution to work this issue without using different IDoc types for actual and simulation run. The ALE distribution model (R/3->XI) will be same for both the cases but I want to know if there is any simple way that XI could figure out between actual and simulation run.
    Thanks
    Sri

    that's a good question.
    I'm using cremas right now to transfer data from our ECC 6 box to our HR box and it's been working great for the past 3 years.
    I was pulled into this implementation after their distribution model was already set up so I just assumed they needed to use that message type for some reason.
    I have a call to them to verify whether they really need it or can just use cremas.

Maybe you are looking for