ALEREMOTE profile to run chain:do SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW contain S_BI-WHM_RFC?

In order to run process chain, we know that the RFC user ALEREMOTE has to have the profile S_BI-WHM_RFC assigned to it.
Now our we run process chain on BW PROD, find the first few variants fail and the whole chain stops in the beginning. We check the profiles assigned to ALEREMOTE and find our BASIS gives it two profiles SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW. Not sure if SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW contains S_BI-WHM_RFC.
Any answer?
Thanks

Kevin,
Yes, sap_all have that profile.
Sap_all and sap_new gives every authorizations of the system (you can say is a "super user").
This may be a little risky, but you won't have any problems with process chains.
Which error gives you de chain?
Hope it helps,
Regards,
Diego.

Similar Messages

How to maintain Employee photo in ESS who's who without sap_all and sap_new

Hi ALL,
Displaying Employee photo in ESS Who's who. it is working but with SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW user profiles.
My requirment is without SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW user profiles. how it is working where can i maintain authorizations for this issue.
The parameter i used are as follows:
Business obj: PREL
Doc type: HRICOLFOTO
Personal num: 00000094
Infotype: 0002
Photo type: .JPG
please help me.
Regaards
Satya.

Dear satya .
Please check the following
1. Trace with the t.code ST01 and check that object require.
2. The portal require the following obect:
S_SERVICE
S_RFC
P_PERNR
PLOG
P_ORGIN/ P_ORGINCON
P_HAP_DOC, if you work with Appraisal Document.
3. Check the table T77S0
P_PERNR, P_ORGIN, y P_ORGINGCON
4. Check that you have the roles need for ESS.
SAP_ESSUSER
SAP_ESSUSER_ERP05
SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP05
SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP_13
SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP05_xx
SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP_13_xx
5. Check the following notes:
SAP Note 857431 - ESS: Authorizations and roles for WD services in ERP 2005
SAP Note 844639 - MSS: Authorizations and roles for WD services in ERP 2005
SAP Note 1373177 - Back end authorization roles missing in EHP4
SAP Note 824757.
[ESS Quick Start|http://www.cogentibs.com/pdf/cogsap08/ESS.pdf]
Hope is help you.
Regards
consultor_ess_mss

Spro full authorization without sap_all and sap_new

Hi Friends,
Can u suggest me how to give spro full authorization without sap_all and sap_new profile.
Thanks & Regards,
Tarun

Hi Gowrinadh,
This is an interesting discussion. I don't mean to take shots at your concept, but I have some concerns about it as a solution.
> I have prepared a role 8 months back, we passed 2 patch upgrade cycles and I can confirm that this role will work even after the next version of ECC upgrade.
Sometimes the symptoms only make themselves visible later, and we don't know what is coming in the next version of ECC. Of course it should be largely compatable, but there will be new stuff. You can be sure of that.
> If there are any modules or new functionalities required, then customer has to request for it in addition.
My understand is that the customer requests a full and working SPRO role for each release. They will not find the tcodes for you and do not want to play ping-pong via support tickets either with it.
So each time you bill your customer for the 20 or 40 hours work for maintaining these tcodes manually in ranges? Appart from being error-prone, this solution is not scalable for when SAP might introduce another 20000 tcodes into the SPRO. Or someone convinces SAP to introduce an S_TCODE check for every line of code the whole system... (this is something which some people seem to believe in...), which would introduce several billion new tcodes for you...
> For which we can build separate role.
That is different. The question here (and certainly your solution) is to have them in the same role without duplicates but still including all SPRO access.
If you build them as seperate roles, then you can merge them as projects into one composite and live with the duplicates while checking for any known objects which should not be included.
I would agree with you. That is in my opinion a better solution, but it is not what you have been describing earlier.
> We can plan for authorizations and build roles based on the inputs for today and tomorrow received from customer.
That is the whole point in having maintainable roles and scalable processes. Manually maintaining 20k tcodes is incompatable with such requirements.
> By the way, the max no of consultants and business process owners having this role is not more than 40.
I don't think that assigning the role to less people will make it more usefull, nor that assigning it to more people will bring down it's per user cost of maintenance.
There is some old code posted here already which does what you have described in less than 1 minute. You can find it via the tables I have mentioned above, and will recognize it (and it's age) by the header lines it uses for internal tables. But it still works, since about release 3 point something...
Cheers,
Julius

Hot to restrict sap_all and sap_new

hot to restrict sap_all and sap_new

Hi,
SAP_ALL & SAP_NEW profiles will not be assigned to any users in production environment (Not even to the OSS Users). However, there will be derivatives to these profiles. i.e, these two profiles will be copied and restricted.
Secondly, profile addition will not be done to any user until and unless it is critical. Instead of SAP_ALL, SAP_NEW, other profiles will be assigned like A_ALL etc.,
Have a look at the following link, which may help you:
http://www.learnbasis.com/knowledgebase/index.php?view=ViewArticle&id=29&set=all
Rgds,
Raghu
<removed by moderator>

Sap_all and sap_new

hello guys,
whats the use of assigning sap_new profile to the end users and is it recommended to assign sap_all profile to the user??

Hi Kevin,
You'll find documentation on these profiles here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/4b/65b7398b5a2d31e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Best regards,
Astrid

Authorizations with out sap_all and sap_new

Hi,
I need to give access to all the people which does not have Basis authorizations.
Can any one of you help me in this regard.
Thanks
Venu

Hi Venu,
There is one way
create a role in pfcg in the menu select from the right hand side of you screen select the option From SAP Menu
in this dont select the options Tools and Cross application component
and select all other which will avoid the Basis and Abap technical transactions
and then genetate the profile from the authorization tab then assign the users to the role and comare the users
hope this helps
Kishore
Points are always welcome

I can't get Firefox to start. It says that Firefox is already running after re-install and re-start it again. I have deleted all profiles, but no luck. HELP!

I can't get Firefox to start. It says that Firefox is already running after re-install and re-start it again. I have deleted all profiles, but no luck. HELP! edit

-> [[Firefox is already running but is not responding]]
-> Profile in use
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_in_use
Check and tell if its working.

ALEREMOTE LOCK at Process chain level

hello experts,
Please suggest me to resolve this ALEREMOTE LOCK at process chain level.
Because of this the chain is failed at different process levels.
the below mentioned is the job log.
Job tarted
Step 001 started (program RSPROCESS, variant &0000000464318, user ID ALEREMOTE)
Object requested is currently locked by user ALEREMOTE
Entire chain now has status 'R'
Process Generate Index, variant Generated from LOADING ZPAK_3TLYNXGWP514GLCXQ33XDE has status Undefined (instance )
Process Execute InfoPackage, variant PC : Quotation NA to Pipe has status Undefined (instance )
Process Start Process, variant Start Hist and Pipe load has status Completed (instance 4B15FK2YHXC7EW1D221A4EHIM)
Process Local Process Chain, variant 6660 ZSDC2ABC has status Successfully completed (instance 4B14MFS6APTW94XB79A4MSTV2)
Process Delete Index, variant Generated from LOADING ZPAK_3TLYNOIAKRPCQAO2X0DLN4 has status Successfully completed (instance DIDX_4B16EOQH4JK3BMJ41536QIHPQ)
Process Execute InfoPackage, variant PC : Quotation NA to Historical has status Successfully completed (instance REQU_4B180R5J6D8OIIEK0S9K0OH0U)
Process Generate Index, variant Generated from LOADING ZPAK_3TLYNOIAKRPCQAO2X0DLN4 has status Successfully completed (instance INDX_4B18Q9XP4GQZLL7LXGI5JYFXQ)
Process Delete Index, variant Generated from LOADING ZPAK_3TLYNXGWP514GLCXQ33XDE has status Undefined (instance DIDX_4B18CADCFC1SL10FHBFZ7ZINI)
Termination of chain has been reported to meta chain 4B154CLBHDTKWHZEYFNE6RWOE
Job finished
Additional information::
For the fisrt month - Error occured in block load infopackage
Message text:Process Execute Info Package, variant PC: Quotation NA to Pipe has status Ended with errors (instance REQU_49OKKAVXV8WM75XY9268J
Second month - Error occured in block load infopackage(same as last month)
message text:Process Execute Info Package, variant PC: Quotation NA to Pipe has status Ended with errors (instance REQU_4ACQBCYASM88BVNSCWVG6
Fourth month - error already in the first load
Message text:Process Execute InfoPackage, variant PC : Quotation NA to Historical has status Ended with errors (instance REQU_4APCZRLE8E4BAY0
Fifth month - error in the "delete indexes" step
Message text: Process Delete Index, variant Generated from LOADING ZPAK_3TLYNXGWP514GLCXQ33XDE has status Ended with errors (instance DIDX_4B1.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: S MB on Sep 9, 2008 12:01 PM
Edited by: S MB on Sep 9, 2008 2:29 PM
Edited by: S MB on Sep 9, 2008 2:31 PM

Thanks for replies.
Its a issue related to Transaction data(No master data is in these PC loading).
Any body let me know is there any TCode available in BW to see all jobs which are running on a specific CUBE / ODS.
I mean...How can we come to know the jobs(all jobs in a same time) which are running on a perticular CUBE/ODS?
Instead of SM12 & SM58
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: S MB on Sep 10, 2008 7:32 AM
Edited by: S MB on Sep 10, 2008 8:02 AM
Edited by: S MB on Sep 10, 2008 8:08 AM
Edited by: S MB on Sep 10, 2008 10:58 AM

An update tries to run, but an error message stating "The update could not be installed. Please make sure there are no other copies of Firefox running on your computer, and then restart Firefox to try again." I can't open Firefox

I click on Firefox and it says that Firefox is installing your updates and will start in a few minutes. Then I get "The update could not be installed. Please make sure there are no other copies of Firefox running on your computer, and then restart Firefox to try again." this cycle never ends. Do I need to deinstall Firefox and re-install? If I do that, do i lose all of my bookmarks, etc?

See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Software_Update (Software Update not working properly)
Remove the files in the updates and updates\0 folder:
*C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates
*(%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates)
*C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\updates
*Do a clean reinstall and download a fresh Firefox copy from http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all.html and save the file to the desktop.
*Uninstall your current Firefox version and remove the Firefox program folder before installing that copy of the Firefox installer. Do not remove personal data when uninstalling.
*It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
You can skip the step to create a new profile, that is not necessary for this issue.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Clean_reinstall

When I try to start Firefox, I get a message that it is already running but not responding and I can't run another Firefox at the same time. I uninstalled and reinstalled. No change. Tried various other suggestions. Help!!

When I try to start Firefox, I get a message that it is already running, but not responding and that I should close it before trying to run another Firefox. But I cannot find a way to close Firefox program that is not running as far as I can see. I tried uninstalling and reinstalling Firefox, but that did not work. I've tried various other things, but no luck. I thought programs should stop when the computer is turned off, but that didn't work either.

How are you opening the Profile Manager?
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_Manager
Sounds that Firefox is still or already running. 
See:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Kill_application

BizTalk Tracking Profile Editor not tracking the data and how to implement the Orchestration as wcf service over SSL

Hi Ashwinprabhu,
thank you very much for your answer.
i have one more query, I have orchestration published as wcf service in IIS and internally orchestration calling one more service , it means orchestration sending a request and getting response back from the service.
actually we are implementing the copy of that called service through biztalk orchestration for system automatic and tracking failed messages and n/w failures.
But tracking profiler not tracking the Data.
And we need to develop the http service as https(Over SSL), we implemented in iis using self
signed certificate, it is working just browser for wsdl(in browser), we are not able to test the service in wcf test client, it is giving wsdl error, in wsdl schema reference showing with HTTP only,
please help me how to resolve the issue.
Teegala

First things first, I think it's best to publish only schemas as WCF service for dependency management reasons. That said - WSDL availability is covered in the WCF adapter under the behaviors. If you're using HTTPBasic this may be hard to modify, but using
WCFCustom allows you to add the WSDL behavior and specify that it should be available via HTTPS.
As to the BAM, are you using TPE within the orchestration or at the port level? I'd imagine your TPE tracks the start and end events of your orchestration using the Orchestration Schedule. If you're fairly confident that the TPE is correct and
yet don't see BAM data 1) make sure your SQL Agent is running healthy and all jobs look OK and 2) check the TDDS tables in both the message box and the BAMPrimaryImport databases. These will show you if there has been some sort of sync issue. There's
even a TDDS errors tables - so check that out.
Kind Regards,
-Dan
If this answers your question, please Mark as Answer

I recently (Jan 2012) acquired a MacBook Pro (MBP) running 10.7.4 and an AirPort Express. I also have an old PPC G4 tower (Digital Audio model) running 10.4.11. The OS software on both machines is totally up to date. AirPort Utility on the G4 is 5.4.2

I recently (Jan 2012) acquired a MacBook Pro (MBP) running 10.7.4 and an AirPort Express. I also have an old PPC G4 tower (Digital Audio model) running 10.4.11. The OS software on both machines is totally up to date. AirPort Utility on the G4 is 5.4.2 and on 6.0 on the MBP. I bought a used AirPort card for the G4, I believe it is 802.11b compatible, and the wireless data rate is specified at 11 Mbps. Being a newbie to wireless, it took me many days to get these two machines to link up. This network is not connected to the internet, and there no other networks in the vicinity.
My last problem to solve is the very slow file transfer speeds between the two machines. The transfer time seems to vary depending on which machine I use to initiate the transfer, and which direction the transfer is going. For example: If I initiate the transfer from the G4 and send a 5.4MB file to the MBP it takes 1:32 (min:sec), while the same file going from the MBP to the G4 takes 27 seconds. On the other hand if the transfer is initiated on the MBP, going from the MBP to the G4 takes 2:56, while going from the G4 to the MBP takes 1:59. I realize that these times are not actual wireless transfer times but includes the entire transfer process.
Both machines and the AirPort Express are within a 4-foot radius. Both machines are set to radio channel 2. The AirPort Express is set for 802.11n(802.11b/g compatible) with WPA/WPA2 Personal wireless security.
Any help would be appreciated.
CEU2

BDAqua,
Thanks for the response.
Apple has used the term "Digital Audio" to identify this machine. System Profiler has the following information:
Machine Name: Power Mac G4
Machine Model: PowerMac3,5
CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (2.1)
Number Of CPUs: 1
CPU Speed: 800 MHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB
Memory: 768 MB
Bus Speed: 133 MHz
Boot ROM Version: 4.3.3f2
Serial Number: XBxxxxxMK9
Sales Order Number:
Yes, I could connect them by ethernet if all I wanted to do was transfer files, but I would like to network them so I could use wireless internet. The machines are not always so close together, I did that to simplify the testing. With the very slow transfer speeds I am reluctant to move ahead with the internet step.
<Edited By Host>

I am having trouble dating to version 3.6.14. I am running Linux/Ubutu OS and I get this error message:/tmp/p7x3vko2.part could not be saved, because the source file could not be read. Please help. Thank you , Deb

I am having trouble dating to version 3.6.14 or updating to the Beta testing. I am running Linux/Ubutu OS and I get this error message:/tmp/p7x3vko2.part could not be saved, because the source file could not be read. Please help. Thank you , Deb

Solved for me.
I set the owner/permissions of my profile's mozilla folder's (and all the files in it) to read/write access, and the problem disappeared.
in linux:''
* cd /home/myusername/.mozilla
* chown -cR myusername:mygroup ./
* chmod -cR +rw ./
'''Never do that with root privs (nor with sudo)'''

Can't Figure Out If My Macbook Can Upgrade , currently running 10.6.8 and wanted to get latest version os but can't upgrade current os Please Help !!!!

Can't Figure Out If My Macbook Can Upgrade , currently running 10.6.8 and wanted to get latest version os but can't upgrade current os Please Help !!!! Hardware Overview:
Model Name: MacBook Air
Model Identifier: MacBookAir3,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 1.4 GHz
Number of Processors: 1
Total Number of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 3 MB
Memory: 2 GB
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Boot ROM Version: MBA31.0061.B01
SMC Version (system): 1.67f4
Serial Number (system): C0*******DQX
processor 1.4 ghz
mem 2gb 1067 mhz ddr3
startup disk Macintosh HD
<Edited by Host>

You can upgrade to Mountain Lion
Upgrading from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion
You can upgrade to Mountain Lion from Lion or directly from Snow Leopard. Mountain Lion can be downloaded from the Mac App Store for $19.99.
If you sign into the App Store and try to purchase Mountain Lion but the App Store says your computer is not compatible then you may still be able to upgrade to Lion per the following information.
Upgrading to Mountain Lion
To upgrade to Mountain Lion you must have Snow Leopard 10.6.8 or Lion installed. Purchase and download Mountain Lion from the App Store. Sign in using your Apple ID. Mountain Lion is $19.99 plus tax. The file is quite large, over 4 GBs, so allow some time to download. It would be preferable to use Ethernet because it is nearly four times faster than wireless.
 OS X Mountain Lion - System Requirements
 Macs that can be upgraded to OS X Mountain Lion
 1. iMac (Mid 2007 or newer) - Model Identifier 7,1 or later
 2. MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer) - Model Identifier 5,1 or later
 3. MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer) - Model Identifier 3,1 or later
 4. MacBook Air (Late 2008 or newer) - Model Identifier 2,1 or later
 5. Mac mini (Early 2009 or newer) - Model Identifier 3,1 or later
 6. Mac Pro (Early 2008 or newer) - Model Identifier 3,1 or later
 7. Xserve (Early 2009) - Model Identifier 3,1 or later
To find the model identifier open System Profiler in the Utilities folder. It's displayed in the panel on the right.
 Are my applications compatible?
 See App Compatibility Table - RoaringApps.
 For a complete How-To introduction from Apple see Upgrade to OS X Mountain Lion.

"The update could not be installed. Please make sure there are no other copies of Firefox running on your computer, and then restart Firefox to try again"

I'm using Firefox 4 Beta and I tryed install update but I dont got success. Now every time that I go start the browser is displayed the mensage: "The update could not be installed. Please make sure there are no other copies of Firefox running on your computer, and then restart Firefox to try again"
My release is installed not in default drive C:\. I installed in the other Partition on my PC.
I don't have other release installed.

Try a clean re-install.
* Download the setup file from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/RC (this is for the Firefox 4 release candidate)
* Uninstall Firefox, do not select the option to "Remove my Firefox personal data"
* Delete the Firefox installation directory - http://kb.mozillazine.org/Installation_directory
* Re-install Firefox
This process does not remove the Firefox user data such as bookmarks and passwords which are stored elsewhere in the profile folder.
You may also need to manually reset the Software Update feature by deleting the software update files as shown in the "Software Update not working properly" section here - http://kb.mozillazine.org/Software_Update

ALEREMOTE profile to run chain:do SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW contain S_BI-WHM_RFC?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for