Alias Field in Lync 2013

Hello
In Lync 2010, there used to be a field called Alias (which is visible on the Outlook Contact Card as well).
We were able to store the Standard ID (SID) which is kind of a Unique number for every employee in the org.
Is there a way for us to make this appear on the Lync 2013 contact card?
Could a complete listing be provided of what fields can be made available? This is causing significant issues as an SID (Alias) is used in a lot of communication and we are in a habit of finding it on the contact card.

Hi ShubhamGarg,
You could install
Lync Server 2013 Resource Kit Tools
, and the Address Book Service Configuration tool (ABSConfig) is an administrative tool that helps administrators customize Address Book Service configuration in Lync Server 2013.
Click the link below for more information:
Lync Server 2013 Resource Kit Tools Documentation
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj945604.aspx
If you have any further question, please feel free to let me know.
Best regards,
Eric

Similar Messages

Lync 2013 mobile client can't see all fields in contact card

We have deployed Lync 2013 infra in our organization, now we observed, mobile Lync client users are not able to see other users mobile number on contact card rest all information is visible.
Is there any workaround or fix to resolve this issue. Appreciate quick help.

That's effectively by design (but a popular complaint). The workaround is to put the users who's mobile numbers you need in your Outlook contact list. There's another workaround related to setting the privacy relationship, but you have to coordinate
it with many people which is not too feasible.
Here are others upset about it:
http://ammarhasayen.com/2013/09/25/lync-2013-mobile-contact-card-not-showing-mobile-number/
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications

Is Lync 2013 and Office 2010 Home and business compatible?

hi,
Is Lync 2013 and Office 2010 Home and business compatible?
tnx

Lync 2013 and office 2010 is compatible with limited features
The following features are available only with Office 2010 or Office 2013:
Contact card with expanded options, such as video call and desktop sharing
Quick search from the Find a Contact field in Outlook
Reply with an IM or call from the Outlook Home ribbon in the Mail, Calendar, Contacts, and Tasks folders
Lync Contacts list in Outlook To-Do Bar
Office Backstage (File tab) presence status, program sharing, and file transfer
Presence menu in Microsoft Office SharePoint Workspace 2010 (formerly Microsoft Office Groove 2007)
Presence menu extensibility
Also you can refer below link
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg412817.aspx
For your issue, verify from lync version {for example , if your office 64 bit, Lync must be 64 bit also}
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Can't Log In with Lync 2013 Windows 8 App over VPN

Howdy,
I've downloaded the Lync 2013 App to Windows 8.1. When I type in my work email, I can't sign in. I get that the server isn't available or doesn't support Lync.
The error is attached.
I can't find a forum for the Lync App itself so I'm hoping to be redirected or since this has to be an easy question, someone might answer it here.
I'm logged in on our VPN and I'm working around this issue right now with RDP to my desktop and signing in to Lync 2010 there. This is for the purpose of doing my class this next week from home and showing Yep, I'm really available over Lync.
What is really desired is to get Lync on my remote machine working but there's no real Settings page on the App.
Apparently it does pick up the VPN and tries to sign me in:
However, there's not much of a way to configure anything. I can't find a "Settings" page. Tried uninstall/reinstall to see if I didn't fat finger something.
Lync 2010 is set up on company laptops to work over VPN correctly from home so I can't imagine it's this hard. I think the "oversimplified" approach of just putting in the email address and (I'm theorizing) letting Lync detect VPN or not,
can I log in, etc. or whatever it does, this isn't working. And of course, it's Encapsulated. :)
OK, I have a work around, it's not a do or die issue here. I'll RDP to my desktop, sign in and Lync will show me available. I'll set my location as Home during the hours of the class.
But ... it's always REALLY annoying when you KNOW it's a simple setup procedure and if that's just found ...
Thanks for any help.
Michael Durthaler

Check that you configure requirement for Lync windows store App as exist in below link
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj823129.aspx
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Can I add a two way trusted but in different forest domain to My existing Lync 2013 Topology !

HI !
We have an installed Lync 2013 Std Edt. setup and its working perfectly for one domain. Our network infrastructure ( LAN ) is being shared with our sister company. They have their own forest and domain and a two ways trust relationship with our domain. I
want to add them in our Lync 2013 topology, is it possible ?? if yes, thn what are the requirements and which changes i need to consider.
Response from experts would be greatly appreciated.

Yes, You must establish a two-way trust between the central forest and user forests to enable distribution group expansion when groups from user forests are synchronized as contacts to the central forest.
Also you can refer below link
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg670909%28v=ocs.14%29.aspx
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical

Lync 2013 Desktop does not start on WIndows 8.1

My Office 365 version of Lync 2013 64bit crashes every time I start it. There is no error message just the "Microsoft Lync has stopped working" message with Close option. In further looking for a solution, I found the suggestion to
uninstall the Intel Bluetooth drivers but my system uses Realtek Filter drivers. I have looked  in the event logs and found:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        Windows Error Reporting
Date:          2014-09-11 1:47:20 PM
Event ID:      1001
Task Category: None
Level:         Information
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      --------Win8
Description:
Fault bucket 85949488684, type 4
Event Name: APPCRASH
Response: Not available
Cab Id: 0
Problem signature:
P1: lync.exe
P2: 15.0.4641.1000
P3: 53c5ce3c
P4: KERNELBASE.dll
P5: 6.3.9600.17055
P6: 532954fb
P7: e06d7363
P8: 0000000000005bf8
P9:
P10:
Attached files:
C:\Users\Yves\AppData\Local\Temp\WERCA6B.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
These files may be available here:
C:\Users\Yves\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportArchive\AppCrash_lync.exe_1f7a49ef615ca788e016ddaf8db0d1fb92c4a8e9_00000000_256fdc4d
Analysis symbol:
Rechecking for solution: 0
Report Id: aa908032-39db-11e4-8280-48d224dc5142
Report Status: 0
Hashed bucket: 61000269e077a9a343a6fe9bbb7efc54
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
    <Provider Name="Windows Error Reporting" />
    <EventID Qualifiers="0">1001</EventID>
    <Level>4</Level>
    <Task>0</Task>
    <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2014-09-11T17:47:20.000000000Z" />
    <EventRecordID>143379</EventRecordID>
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer>Fedmet-YL-Win8</Computer>
    <Security />
</System>
<EventData>
    <Data>85949488684</Data>
    <Data>4</Data>
    <Data>APPCRASH</Data>
    <Data>Not available</Data>
    <Data>0</Data>
    <Data>lync.exe</Data>
    <Data>15.0.4641.1000</Data>
    <Data>53c5ce3c</Data>
    <Data>KERNELBASE.dll</Data>
    <Data>6.3.9600.17055</Data>
    <Data>532954fb</Data>
    <Data>e06d7363</Data>
    <Data>0000000000005bf8</Data>
    <Data>
    </Data>
    <Data>
    </Data>
    <Data>
C:\Users\Yves\AppData\Local\Temp\WERCA6B.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml</Data>
    <Data>C:\Users\Yves\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportArchive\AppCrash_lync.exe_1f7a49ef615ca788e016ddaf8db0d1fb92c4a8e9_00000000_256fdc4d</Data>
    <Data>
    </Data>
    <Data>0</Data>
    <Data>aa908032-39db-11e4-8280-48d224dc5142</Data>
    <Data>0</Data>
    <Data>61000269e077a9a343a6fe9bbb7efc54</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
A lot of sites suggest to uninstall Intel Bluetooth drive but I does not have Intel Bluetooth.

Go to your computer manufacturer’s website and update all driver packages for your computer, especially:
Audio drivers
Bluetooth drivers
System chipset drivers
webcam drivers
Important Note:
If you use office 64 bit, Lync 2013 must be 64 bit also. {And vice versa, If you use office 32 bit, Lync 2013 must be 32 bit}
Also check answer of Eric to fix this issue
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e8268935-e97c-4033-9a2e-02734b4390bf/lync-2013-client-on-windows-81-stuck-at-starting?forum=ocsclients
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Lync 2013 certificate requirements for multiple SIP domains

Hi All,
I am engaged with a client in respect of a Lync 2013 implementation initially as a conferencing platform with a view to enabling EV functions (inc. PSTN conferencing) in the future. They initially need to support 30 SIP domains and eventually
around 100 SIP domains which is proving to be either not possible or severely cost prohibitive. Their current certificate provider, Thawte, can only support up to 25 SANs and have quoted them 5 figures. We tend to use GeoTrust as they are cheaper but they
appear to have a limit of 25 SANs. GoDaddy appear to support up to 100 SANs for a pretty reasonable cost. My questions are as follows:
Is there a way that I’m missing of reducing the number of SANs required on the Edge server?
Use aliases for access edge FQDNs - Supported by desktop client but not by other devices so not really workable
Don’t support XMPP federation therefore removing the need for domain name FQDNs for each SIP domain
Is there a way that I’m missing of reducing the number of SANs required on the Reverse Proxy server?
Friendly URL option 3 from this page:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398287.aspx
Client auto-configuration:
i.
Don’t support mobile client auto-configuration in which case no lyncdiscover.sipdomain1.com DNS records or SANs would be required.
ii.
Support mobile client auto-configuration over HTTP only in which case CNAME records are required for each SIP domain (lyncdiscover.sipdomain1.com, etc. pointing to lyncdiscover.designateddomain.com) but no SANs are required.
iii.
Support mobile client auto-configuration over HTTPS in which case DNS records are required for each SIP domain and a SAN entry for each SIP domains is also required. This is because a DNS CNAME to another domain is not supported over
HTTPS.
If the answer to 1 and/or 2 is no, are there certificate providers that support over 100 SANs?
How do certificate requirements differ when using the Lync 2013 hosting pack? I would think that this issue is something that a hosting provider would need to overcome.
Would the Lync 2013 Hosting Pack work for this customer? The customer uses SPLA licensing so I think is eligible to use the hosting pack but not 100% sure it will work in their environment given that client connections are supposed
to all come through the Edge where their tenants will be internal and also given the requirement for an ACP for PSTN conferencing.
Many thanks,

Many thanks for the response.
I was already planning to use option 3 from the below page for simple URLs to cut down on SAN requirement.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398287.aspx
What are the security concerns for publishing autodiscover over port 80? I.e. Is this only used for the initial download of the discovery record and then HTTPS is used for authentication? This seems to be the case from the following note on the below page:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/hh690030.aspx
Mobile device clients do not support multiple Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificates from different domains. Therefore, CNAME redirection to different domains is not supported over HTTPS. For example, a DNS CNAME record for lyncdiscover.contoso.com that redirects
to an address of director.contoso.net is not supported over HTTPS.
In such a topology, a mobile device client needs to use HTTP for the first request, so that the CNAME redirection is resolved over HTTP. Subsequent requests then use HTTPS. To support this scenario, you need to configure your reverse proxy with a web publishing
rule for port 80 (HTTP).
For details, see "To create a web publishing rule for port 80" in Configuring the Reverse Proxy for Mobility. CNAME redirection to the same domain is supported over HTTPS. In this case, the destination domain's certificate covers the originating
domain.”
I don’t think SRV records for additional SIP domain access edge is a workable solution as this is not supported by some devices.
As per the below article:
http://blog.schertz.name/2012/07/lync-edge-server-best-practices/
“The recommended approach for external client Automatic Sign-In when supporting multiple SIP domains is to include a unique Access Edge FQDN for each domain name in the SAN field. This is no longer a requirement (it was in OCS) as it is possible to
create a DNS Service Locator Record (SRV) for each additional SIP domain yet have them all point back to the same original FQDN for the Access Edge service (e.g. sip.mslync.net).
This approach will trigger a security alert in Windows Lync clients which can be accepted by the user, but some other clients and devices are unable to connect when the Automatic Sign-In process returns a pair of SRV and Host (A) records which do not share
the same domain namespace. Thus it is still best practice to define a unique FQDN for each additional SIP domain and include that hostname in the external Edge certificate’s SAN field”.
===================
1. Basically the requirement is to initially provide Lync conferencing services (minus PSTN conferencing) to internal, external, federated and anonymous participants with a view to providing PSTN conferencing and therefore enterprise voice services later.
2. The customer currently supports close to 100 SMTP domains and wants to align their SIP domains with these existing domains. The structure of their business is such that “XXX IT Services” provide the IT infrastructure for a collection of companies who
fall under the XXX umbrella but are very much run as individual entities.
Question:
Would you agree that I’m going to need a SAN for every SIP domain’s access edge FQDN?
Thanks.

Lync 2013 do not show own photo

We have Lync 2013 and Exchange 2010. I imported photos to our AD. In Outlook 2010 we can see our own photo, but Lync 2013 client do not display user own photo, but when user1
write a message to user2, user2 receive message with user1 photo. This is a global problem, not for one user.
Can you help me in this case, because I didn't find any useful information?

Ben, thank you for quick response.
Our client policy:
Identity
DisplayPhoto
Global
AllPhotos
I imported only 96x96 pixels size photo. I also tried to import photo manually, but it not make any change in this problem.
Import-RecipientDataProperty -Identity "Name Lastname" -Picture -FileData ([Byte[]]$(Get-Content -Path "C:\user.jpg" -Encoding Byte -ReadCount 0))
If Lync 2013 user type his name in Lync search field and open his contact in Lync 2013 client, he able to see
his photo, company name, phone numbers and etc...
Lync 2013 clients and server have installed latest updates.

Lync 2013 client doesn't read proxy.pac file Lync exclusions

Hi all,
I have a very annoying issue where by the Lync 2013 client ignores the proxy.pac file exclusions set below:
(host == "lync.test.domain") || (host == "lyncdiscoverinternal.test.domain") ||
(host == "lyncwacdca.test.domain") ||
(host == "lyncwacdcb.test.domain") ||
(host == "lyncwebintdca.test.domain") ||
(host == "lyncwebintdcb.test.domain")
IE is set to use automatic configuration script of
http://proxy.test.domain:8083/proxy.pac This file can be reached through and IE browser, downloaded and it's syntax read.
If I set my proxy server and exclusions manually within IE9 then they are adhered to. That is Lync 2013 is able to read.
My thinking: that some application may be iterferring with Lync 2013 getting to
http://proxy.test.domain:8083/proxy.pac or reading in the exclusions set within the file.
If I enter https://lync.test.domain into the browser URL search field I can see that it is being sent straight out to the proxy as opposed to bypassing it.
Does anyone have an example of their proxy.pac exclusion set for Lync 2013 just in case my syntax is not looking the best.
Cheers

Update to this issue - solution was to move the proxy exclusions to the top of the proxy.pac
Outcome resulted in Windows WinHTTP processing the the Lync proxy exclusions prior to the Lync.exe firing during logon. I don't believe you would see this in a typical infrastructure. Since initially looking into this issue I have been
able to show through packet traces, large periods of latency in delivery of desktop profile items due to backend profile storage issues.
In eddition this moving the exclusions to the top of the pac file I made use of substrings. I don't believe the use of substrings is any better or worst, but just easier for others to understand what the exclusion allows specifically.
Example of pac exclusion now:
if (url.substring(0,39) == "http://lyncdiscoverinternal.testdomain.") { return "DIRECT"; } //matches 31 characters including last . or period
I entered similar entries for all required exclusions. The result was Lync signing in within 6 seconds as opposed to the 40 second (through the user of legacy SRV records).

Lync 2013 / CIMP(CUPS) 9.1.2 - RCC

Has anyone successfully gotten RCC working between Lync 2013 and UCM(IM&P) 9.1? I have followed the docs but cannot seem to log in. From the traces/captures I have collected it appears CIMP is returning a 401. I ran the RCC troubleshooter on CIMP server and everything comes back green.
I should point out we are using different domains.
example.com is the Lync domain
vc.example.com is the CUPS domain
example.local is our internal (AD) domain
Here is a brief snippet of the log from the CIMP side when Lync client logs on.
INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:pdx-lync-pool-2.example.local;transport=tcp;ms-fe=pdx-lync-2.example.local;opaque=state:T;lr>;tag=C4140F78AB707EE55A3542C290EE3BDD
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.7:50752;branch=z9hG4bKCEFA4AC7.35E3FA581770D77B;branched=FALSE
Max-Forwards: 69
ms-application-via: SIP;ms-urc-rs-from;ms-server=pdx-lync-2.example.local;ms-pool=pdx-lync-pool-2.example.local;ms-application=ad894dc3-55e0-44bf-a07e-3c073aaa4a57
From: "Doe, John"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=a9affac418;epid=c39ec15244
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.6.152:57095;ms-received-port=57095;ms-received-cid=1BF000
To: <sip:[email protected]>
Call-ID: 7fb389cf26a740309ac9f34eb6f5806d
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: <sip:[email protected];opaque=user:epid:9TcRoRhNhVqj1eWYVIl_awAA;gruu>
User-Agent: UCCAPI/15.0.4623.1000 OC/15.0.4623.1000 (Microsoft Lync)
Supported: ms-dialog-route-set-update
Content-Disposition: signal;handling=required
Supported: timer
Supported: histinfo
Supported: ms-safe-transfer
Supported: ms-sender
Supported: ms-early-media
ms-keep-alive: UAC;hop-hop=yes
Allow: INVITE, BYE, ACK, CANCEL, INFO, UPDATE, REFER, NOTIFY, BENOTIFY, OPTIONS
ms-subnet: 192.168.0.0
Content-Type: application/csta+xml
Content-Length: 329
ms-routing-phase: from-uri-routing-done
ms-user-data: ms-publiccloud=TRUE;ms-federation=TRUE
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<RequestSystemStatus xmlns="http://www.ecma-international.org/standards/ecma-323/csta/ed3"><extensions><privateData><private><lcs:line xmlns:lcs="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Lcs/2005/04/RCCExtension">tel:2373;phone-context=dialstring</lcs:line></private></privateData></extensions></RequestSystemStatus>
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) mod_sip_numexpand.c(891) User john.doe is IP or contains non-E164 character, no number expansion applied.
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) mod_sip_numexpand.c(891) User john.doe is IP or contains non-E164 character, no number expansion applied.
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) mod_sip_numexpand.c(788) URL host example.com doesn't point at proxy, no number expansion on user john.doe
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) mod_sip_numexpand.c(891) User john.doe is IP or contains non-E164 character, no number expansion applied.
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) sip_sm.c(1197) Sent 406 bytes TCP packet to 192.168.1.7:50752
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.7:50752;received=192.168.1.7;branch=z9hG4bKCEFA4AC7.35E3FA581770D77B;branched=FALSE, SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.6.152:57095;ms-received-port=57095;ms-received-cid=1BF000
Call-ID: 7fb389cf26a740309ac9f34eb6f5806d
From: "Doe, John"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=a9affac418;epid=c39ec15244
To: <sip:[email protected]>
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Content-Length: 0
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] [debug] mod_authz_host.c(287): [client (null)] find_allowdeny: match remotehost pdx-lync-2.example.local compare pdx-lync-2.example.local
PID(25341) sip_sm.c(4788) ACL - upstream trusted - no need to authenticate
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) sip_sm.c(987) TCB_PROXIED_STATE_TIMER : 60 seconds.
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) sip_sm.c(4874) Request received from non-local SIP domain: example.com
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) mod_sip_ua.c(2998) sip_ua_handler: unparsed to: <sip:[email protected]>
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) mod_sip_ua.c(1369) find_scb(): about to acquire 7fb389cf26a740309ac9f34eb6f5806d:507aab56-e707780a-27a4bc92-3129d56d
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) mod_sip_ua.c(1379) find_scb(): failed to acquire scb 507aab56-e707780a-27a4bc92-3129d56d:7fb389cf26a740309ac9f34eb6f5806d
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) mod_sip_ua.c(3041) sip_ua_handler(): scb not found for this request
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) mod_sip_ua.c(1639) ua_handle_invite(): INVITE request with body: <?xml version="1.0"?>
<RequestSystemStatus xmlns="http://www.ecma-international.org/standards/ecma-323/csta/ed3"><extensions><privateData><private><lcs:line xmlns:lcs="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Lcs/2005/04/RCCExtension">tel:2373;phone-context=dialstring</lcs:line></private></privateData></extensions></RequestSystemStatus>
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) mod_sip_numexpand.c(788) URL host example.com doesn't point at proxy, no number expansion on user john.doe
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) mod_sip_ctigw.c(6393) ctigw_csta_handler:: Session Time in config =1810
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) mod_sip_ctigw.c(6494) ctigw_csta_handler:: Get CSTA request: 0
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) sip_sm.c(1085) timer_ticks: id:9a39ab68 15 1810
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) mod_sip_ctigw.c(6544) ctigw_csta_handler:: Get CSTA request: 0-RequestSystemStatus
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) mod_sip_ctigw.c(6560) ctigw_csta_handler:: line=2373, device=, partition=, name=, phone-context=dialstring
13:31:55.674 |ID(25341) mod_sip_ctigw.c(2363) Authorizing user (john.doe [email protected]) DN (2373) DEV () Partition ()
13:31:55.674 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25341) mod_sip_ctigw.c(1800) CTIGW DB query : execute procedure GetMOCLineAppearanceInEffect('john.doe', '[email protected]', '2373', '', '')
13:31:55.707 |ID(25351) mod_sip_ctigw.c(2408) user has multiple lines, but has yet selected one
13:31:55.707 |ID(25351) mod_sip_ctigw.c(6576) ctigw_csta_handler:: FAIL AUTHORIZED userID=john.doe [email protected] line=2373, device=
13:31:55.707 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25351) mod_sip_ctigw.c(922) freeQCB(): QCB -1707780688 is about to be freed
13:31:55.707 |ID(25351) mod_sip_ua.c(221) ua_get_map_key(): SCB get failed 4125e7e6
13:31:55.707 |Mon Jun 16 13:31:55 2014] PID(25351) mod_sip_ua.c(2674) ua_scb_destroyed(): scb 9a397758:1 key: 7d1232f0-48071418-40399a77-299640
13:31:55.707 |ID(25351) sip_sm.c(1197) Sent 727 bytes TCP packet to 192.168.1.7:50752
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.7:50752;received=192.168.1.7;branch=z9hG4bK7E5EE7B5.ECF019B6176EE77B;branched=FALSE, SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.6.152:57095;ms-received-port=57095;ms-received-cid=1BF000
Call-ID: ba0cd56054094212ba26145c96b39f2c
From: "Doe, John"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=41e8aed3ab;epid=c39ec15244
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=2241b56c-7230dd55
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Record-Route: <sip:pdx-lync-pool-2.example.local;transport=tcp;ms-fe=pdx-lync-2.example.local;opaque=state:T;lr>;tag=C4140F78AB707EE55A3542C290EE3BDD
Contact: <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=TCP>
User-Agent: Cisco-Systems-Federation\8.0
Content-Disposition: signal;handling=required
Content-Length: 0

I still haven't gotten confirmation, but I was able to work with my Lync admin and we found that if a user has multiple devices, you have to put the specific device in the Line URI field that it is supposed to control. Still working through testing to confirm it will do what we need though...from what I've seen so far, I don't think it will...and Microsoft has said they're going to sunset RCC in the next version of Lync anyway, so...

What is best recommendstion for DNS LB for lync 2013 Edge servers

What is best recommendation for DNS LB for lync 2013 Edge servers ?. We have F5 LB for edge and want to decide if we can go with DNS base LB for Edge servers.
Anil MCC 2011,ITIL V3,MCSA 2003,MCTS 2010, My Blog : http://messagingschool.wordpress.com

It will be better to Use Hardware Load balancing (F5).
If you choose to use DNS load balancing for a pool but still need to implement hardware load balancers for traffic such as HTTP traffic, the administration of the hardware load balancers is greatly simplified. For example, configuring the hardware load balancer
will be simpler as it will only manage the HTTP and HTTPS traffic, while all other protocols will be managed by DNS load balancing
Also for more info., you can check below links
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg615011.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398634.aspx
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

SQL Server 2012 Standard Support for Lync 2013

Hi,
Does SQL 2012 Standard version support Lycn 2013 , I am planning to have following features.
1- SQL 2012 Mirroring
2- Monitoring Role on FE Servers
Regards
Usman Ghani
Usman Ghani - MCITP Exchange 2010

Agree with Anthony, SQL 2012 Standard support Lync 2013.
For Standard or Edition Edition of SQL that according to High availability node of Database that you want.
Two-node failover clustering for the following:
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Standard (64-bit edition). Additionally running the latest service pack is recommended.
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard (64-bit edition). Additionally running the latest service pack is recommended.
Up to sixteen-node failover clustering for the following:
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Enterprise (64-bit edition). Additionally running the latest service pack is recommended.
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 Enterprise database software (64-bit edition). Additionally running the latest service pack is recommended.
Also for more detail details, you can refer below link
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg412952.aspx
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Lync 2013 Watcher Node Synthetic Transactions

I've set up SCOM monitoring for our Lync 2013 deployment.
Everything is looks like perfect, in the SCOM console I can see the watcher node and it looks like the monitoring is functional (marked with green as "monitored"), but in the Event Viewer of the Watcher Node server I cannot find the events 334
or 335, but as far as I know, there should be notofications in every 15 minutes, that the tests was runing and was succesfull or not.
I've tried to remove and create the watcher node configuration again, restrated the health service etc. but nothing was helpful. What is the problem? :/

Verify that enable proxy agent on lync watcher node to can monitor it.
For configure watcher node, you can refer below link
http://lyncdup.com/2013/01/how-to-setup-lync-2010-scom-management-pack-and-synthetic-transactions/
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Lync 2013 isn't saving conversation history in Lync, Saves to Outlook just fine.

So in my Lync client, I have the Conversations icon that has tabs under it for All, Missed, and Calls.
All of those tabs are blank in my program. They said "You'll see your recent conversations here", but there's nothing there. I do see my old conversations in Outlook just fine, but Lync itself isn't saving them.
What's even worse is that my Conversations icon has a '5' next to it and says I have 5 missed conversations. I click it and the tabs are blank.
Any thoughts on this? Most issues I see are when Outlook isn't logging the conversations so my issue is backwards...

Hi,
Please check your settings:
1. On the Lync main window, click Options button, and then click Personal;
2. In the Personal information manager section, select "Microsoft Exchange Or Microsoft Outlook" from Dropdownlist;
3. Checked all checkboxes under this field;
4. Exit Lync 2013 and restart it;
5. Check the result.
If the issue still persists, please try to repair this Office program:
Repair Office programs
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/outlook-help/repair-office-programs-HA010357402.aspx
Best regards,
Karen Hu

Exchange 2013 Lync 2013 IM "Invalid Contact Information"

Hi All,
I'm setting up a new Exchange 2013 server using SP1 (CU5) as the baseline. I'm trying to get Lync 2013 integration for IM working, but I seem to getting a different error message from everyone else. While the first line is the same for people who have certificate
errors, the third line is very different.
2014-07-24T13:32:40.522Z,6,1,,,,0,ERROR:InstantMessageOCSProvider.ResetPresence. SelfDataSession not established.,
2014-07-24T13:32:40.631Z,141,5,,,,0,"DEBUG:InstantMessageOCSProvider.SignInCallback. Context: [email protected], Sip address=sip:[email protected], Lyncserver=lync2013.geosoft.com",
2014-07-24T13:32:40.647Z,141,1,,,,0,"ERROR:UCWEB Failure: Code=OcsRegisterFailure, SubCode=Undefined, Reason=None\r\nMicrosoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.Utilities.UCWException: The endpoint was unable to register. See the ErrorCode for specific reason. --->
Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.RegisterException: The endpoint was unable to register. See the ErrorCode for specific reason.\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.SipAsyncResult`1.ThrowIfFailed()\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.Helper.EndAsyncOperation[T](Object
owner, IAsyncResult result)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.UCWAuthenticatedEndpoint.OotyUserEndpointEstablish_callback(IAsyncResult asyncResult)\r\n --- End of inner exception stack trace ---\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.Utilities.AsyncHelper.EndAsyncCall[T](IAsyncResult
asyncResult, String methodName, T ucwScopeInstance)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.UCWAuthenticatedEndpoint.EndSignIn(IAsyncResult asyncResult)\r\n at Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa2.Server.Core.InstantMessageOCSProvider.<>c__DisplayClass33.<SignInCallback>b__32(RequestDetailsLogger
logger)",
So, I did the trace and it appears things are getting malformed when sending data? This is what the Exchange server is attempting to send.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Outgoing SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_369013E>], 192.168.0.x:11535->192.168.0.y:5061
REGISTER sip:geosoft.com SIP/2.0
FROM: <sip:[email protected]>;epid=AFEB7BEF65;tag=e284bb12fb
TO: <sip:[email protected]>
CSEQ: 1 REGISTER
CALL-ID: 0506b0822fa640c1a2975f8ebcb60c3b
MAX-FORWARDS: 70
VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.0.x:11535;branch=z9hG4bK40a2e4b3
CONTACT: <sip:exch2013.geosoft.com:5075;transport=Tls;ms-opaque=91a37e8f3d315774>;methods="Service,Notify,Benotify,Message,Info,Options,Invite";+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:494c7ee5-e77e-52a8-86dc-a8a029d396c8>";text;audio;video;image
CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
EVENT: Registration
EXPIRES: 1800
SUPPORTED: gruu-10
SUPPORTED: ms-forking
SUPPORTED: msrtc-event-categories
SUPPORTED: ms-userservices-state-notification
SUPPORTED: ms-cluster-failover
USER-AGENT: RTCC/5.0.0.0 OWA/15.00.0913.021
This is the error it's getting back:
<<<<<<<<<<<<Incoming SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_369013E>], 192.168.0.x:11535<-192.168.0.y:5061
SIP/2.0 400 Invalid Contact information
FROM: <sip:[email protected]>;epid=AFEB7BEF65;tag=e284bb12fb
TO: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=37D128C333B73F1A9B13488593AFDD4D
CSEQ: 1 REGISTER
CALL-ID: 0506b0822fa640c1a2975f8ebcb60c3b
VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.0.x:11535;branch=z9hG4bK40a2e4b3;ms-received-port=11535;ms-received-cid=5B37800
CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
SERVER: RTC/5.0
ms-diagnostics: 1018;reason="Parsing failure";source="lync2013.geosoft.com"
Is this a bug? I've been at this for 3 days replacing certificates and resetting Lync user accounts, but now I'm having doubts.

Additional information I was able to dig up using the Lync 2013 logger tool.
Severity: warning
Text: Routing error occurred; check Result-Code field for more information
Result-Code: 0xc3e93f13 SIPPROXY_E_CONTACT_NOT_AUTHORIZED
SIP-Start-Line: REGISTER sip:geosoft.com SIP/2.0
SIP-Call-ID: 64f2f5422044488492ed1e9ee6fa7fd3
SIP-CSeq: 1 REGISTER
Peer: 192.168.0.y:29754
$$end_record

Alias Field in Lync 2013

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for