Alignment problem at header level as well as in lines item level

Hello Experts,
I am facing problem in alignment of text in script.
Account Statement from 01/06/2010 to 30/06/2010   Opening Bal:      xxxx
Currency      KES     Dr Balances:     xxxx
Customer SAP Account No 100000 Cr Balances:     xxxx
I have given T1 as paragraph element  with 2 tabs for header level like for above part
and given T2 with 9 tabs for all columns in item level by calculating length.
for
Doc.              Doc           Trans type Reference (Physical      Dr             Cr     .             Bal       Clearing document No
Date                  Num(SAP) Bal B/F      Invoice No)            
28/05/2010  19000000     NIV          KGN 200000                                 1200000
29/05/2010  15000000     PYT            19000000      200000-           Nil       1200000
But i am getting op like above.
Can you plz help me for maintaining the space?
wat should i do?
Thanks & Regards,
Manisha

If you're trying to control placement with spaces, that will always be a problem, IMO. 
Suggest you rely on tab (,,) without putting in spaces,  and alignment settings for the tab, and create as many paragraph formats as are needed.

Similar Messages

  • Header data not getting updated in line item level

    Hi,
    We are trying to update Pricing date at header level but it is not gettting copied to item level.
    getting an message "The header business data does not apply to item xxxx"
    i have checked the item category and "business item" field is checked. and for the same sales order previously we were able to change the pricing date at header level and it got applied to item level but this time is is not getting applied.
    kindly suggest.

    If there are multiple line items which are having different data; in your case, Pricing Date, then in that case, when you try to change at header level, system will pop up this message.
    You can also have a look at the following note:-
    Note 336660 - Message V1403 in sales order with article order no
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Shopping cart header status differs to status at line item level

    Hello
    I am using SRM 5.5 EC, got a situation where there is a single line shopping cart which has been approved. The status on the header is still showing "awaiting approval" but at line item level it shows as being "approved" and no follow on document has been created.
    Can anyone help and let me know why this has happened and how to change the header status now?
    Many Thanks in Advance
    Prakash

    OK found a solution

  • Switch to Open Item Management at a Line Item Level

    Hi Guru's,
    I want to change a non Open Item G/L account to an Open Item  at Line Item level, we are on version 6.4
    We have activated New G/L and I checked OSS note 175960, it says its not applicable if New G/L activated.
    I tried program FAGL_SWITCH_TO_OPEN_ITEM , it switched the account to Open Item but the problem here is it did't switch at line item level it is just showing total balance. My requirement is to switch at Line Item level.
    Is there any solution other than creating a new A/c with Open Item checked and transfering balances from old A/c to new A/c.
    Please suggest
    Thank You

    Hi,
    There are 3 ways to realize it.
    1. create a new account with XOPVW, then transfer the balance from old account to the new one. this is recommended by SAP.
    2. if you want to change  flag of XOPVW in this account, then make the balance to zero, then change this flag in FS00, at last trasnfer the balance back to this account-> Not recommended by SAP, because it is easy to cause data inconsistency.
    3. method in note:175960-> but report :RFSEPA02 and RFSEPA03 are not support since release 4.5A.
    So if possible, suggest you to use 1.
    Best Regards,
    Gladys

  • Fixed Value Date at line item level is not in changable mode when copied

    Dear SDN Team,
    Hi i have a problem in the Fixed Value date at the line item level in the Return sales order.
    The Problem is When creating the return order with reference to the scheduling agreement (10.03.2010).  In the Return sales Order at the line item level the fixed value date is coping from scheduling agreement item (fixed value date eg: 31.12.2009)
    But i would like to have the fixed value date in the return order as 10.03.2010  but the field is greyed out.
    But normally when the sales document is created with reference to the preceding document the same will be copied.  But field is greyed out and it is not in changable mode.
    Can any one help how to solve this.
    I have checked also SAP Note where i did not find any messages.
    In normal scenario - when the order is created without any reference the fixed value date is in changable mode until the document is in open.
    Pleas help me to resolve this.
    With Regards,
    Jai

    Hi Lakshmipathi,
    I am sharing the resolution which was done to this requirement.
    We have a specific condition type with statisticaly used and with routine to have KWERT with zero value,
    Based on the different key combination. We have a specific key combination for the SA and SDoc and for this we need to maintain a condition record for the condition type with fixed value date and which will be linked to only the specific document.  Once this is done.
    We need to do update pricing in the sales order for the particular line item. by doing this the Fixed value date will be changed in the particular line item.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jana

  • Why should we load header data first and then we load item level data?

    Hi BW guru`s,
    I have small confusion about the data loading.
    Why should we load header data first and then we load item level data?
    Is there any particular reason?
    Scenario: 1st I have uploaded 2LIS_11_VAHDR sales document header data from R/3 to BW by using LO-Cockpit extraction. Then I loaded 2LIS_11_VAITM.This is the norma procedure which we use to follow.
    I have a question. If I load 2LIS_11_VAITM data 1st from R/3 to BW and then I will load 2LIS_11_VAHDR by using LO-Cockpit extraction. what will happen?
    Regards,
    Venkat
    Edited by: VENKAT BOORUGADDA on Aug 12, 2008 11:51 AM

    There is no difference in doing it the other way.
    The load sequence will come into play only during activation where if you map the same fields from the two datasources, you might want to have the previous value overwritten by data from the next datasource.
    That is when you should care about loading one datasource before the other.
    To your question it is not arule that header data should come first.

  • FI Validation rule error message problem at line item level

    Hello all.
    I have created a step within an FI Validation rule (OB28) at the document line item level.  I have set the  message to "E" for an error.  I have generated the validations.  When I test my step, the error is triggered, but triggered as an Information popup - warning and does not give me a hard stop.   Does anyone have an idea why this may happen?   I need this to be a hard stop but not a cancellation of the document entry.  I am using FV60 to enter my document.
    Thanks for help.
    mvp0821

    OSS note # 863267 explains answer.  Cannot create "error" message on ENJOY transactions - FV60 is included in this list.  "E" works on classic transactions.  
    Thanks for thinking about this.

  • IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDRSP at line item level

    Hi All,
    Scenario:  I want to issue the sales order conformation EDI output at the line item level. I set up the condition tables/records at the line item level so the BA00 output is triggered at each line item. But each IDOC has line item record for all the line items and NOT for the line item from where it was issued.
    Is it possible to trigger BA00 at each line item and the corr. IDOC contains only PO1 segment for that line only ?
    I want o/p at the line item as that line can be blocked/rejected (order reason code) and I do not want BA00 for that line (via the o/p reqmnt) . But if the o/p is triggered from the other line item, it contains PO1 segment for that rejected line also.
    Other option is to trigger o/p from header level and check in the user exit if each line is rejected. That will be OK but what if all the line items are rejected and IDOC o/p fails and is in RED color in the o/p screen. How will the end user know that BA00 o/p failed ?
    Your input is appreciated.

    Thanks Again.
    Only problem with the solution is that when the order is in the create mode (not saved), there is no data in XVBAP. If order is already saved and I am trying to send a order ack for a change, it will work bcos I can fill XVBAP by reading VBAP from KOMKBV1-VBELN.
    But this will still help me. I am planning this:
    1> For initial order create, since it will be called by a RFC user (we use XI to pass the IDOC to R/3), I can check in the reqmnt that user type should not be RFC user type and hence reqmnt will not be met and no order conf will be sent. Order will be created with order rejection code for each line.
    2> Order is created , end user reviews the order, if all is OK, removes the order rejection code from each line, saves the order, order req is called at the header, user type is a on-line user, reads all line items fron VBAP into XVBAP and ur logic is read and reqmnt is met and order conf is sent.
    If for any reason order is saved and order rejection code is not removed from ALL line items, reqmnt is not met and order o/p is NOT triggered.
    IF order is saved and there is atleast one line item without any blocks, reqmnt is met, order conf IDOC is triggered and in IDOc user exit, items with order reason codes are rejected/deleted from XVBAP table and order conf is sent only for line items without any bocks.
    It should hopefully work. I will let you know.
    I know, you do not care abt the entire solution / story, but it helps to validate my solution and maybe it will be useful for someone who is trying to acheive the same solution.
    Thanks Again.

  • Correspondence at line item level for Residual customer document

    HI All,
    I want to store corresponence letter for residual documents. The document containts some 20 line items and i want to store different correspondence letters for each & every line item.But system stores at header level and not in line item level.
    I am able to do, when i ran F.61 for each & every line items. Whether its possible to type correspondence for all line items at a single shot and possible to run F.61.
    Thanks
    Hari

    Hi Liz,
    I´ve got the similar problem like you wrote. 
    My client had a reorg project behind and locked the old profit centers. For the reason of clearing open items and FX valuation those locked profit centers need either to be  re-locked or the posting need to be posted to the new profit centers by using substition. Could you please kindly advicehow did you solved this problem?
    OR maybe someone else can help?
    Many thanks in advance.

  • Header Condition not to impact the line items

    Hi Gurus,
    The customer has a requirement where they want to add manual condition in the header at the time of Billing. These conditions will be absolute values (Fixed Amount).
    I have created the relevant condition but the problem is as following:-
    If there are 10 line items on the invoice and the user gives 1 USD at the header level the system assumes this 1 USD for each item on the Invoice and hence the value is summed up to 10 USD.
    The requirement is that this should remain as 1 USD on the header.
    Pl. tell me if there is any standard routine available to achieve this.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Sunny SD on Feb 2, 2012 2:31 PM

    In t.code V/06, for the condition type, check the box group condition and maintain value 2  in the group condition routine. Then test again. Note that the header value will always split and distribute to all line items depending on the settings of the condition type.
    Regards,

  • S_ALR_87013620 Diff in Total & Line Item Level

    Hi All ,
    I'm  running report S_ALR_87013620 for a particular cost center. Now the problem is that when i see Actual value is 30059.19 but if i  double click and select "Cost Centers: Actual Line Items"  system display value      43.283,65     
    I also check value through t-code KSB1 iam getting value 43283.65. means actual vale is 43283.65  then why system displaying 30059.19 in total actual column
    And when i exectute same Report using diffrent user id  then it showing correct value in total as well as in line item 
    can any one help me to find out the root cause of this problem
    Regards
    Prakash Sharma

    Hi Mishi,
    check object authorization , in my case few object are missing .. i just take the screen shot of su53 and send to S&A team and issue is resolved
    Regards
    Prakash Sharma

  • Report at line item level but also for document total for once only

    Dear all,
    seek for your help for the following issue
    There is a A/R invoice with 3 items
    There is a report for retrieving the line item level data from inv1, user would also like to add a column to display the Document total , but the problem is, each line item will also display the Document total, any method to only display the corresponding Document total for once only?
    Example, for AR invoice number 1234567:
    Currently:
    No.                ItemCode        Price      Qty    LineItemTotal      DocumentTotal
    1234567       Item-A            10           1       10                       100
    1234567       Item-B             50          1       50                       100
    1234567       Item-B             20          2       40                       100
    Requested to be presented as:
    No.                ItemCode        Price      Qty    LineItemTotal      DocumentTotal
    1234567       Item-A            10           1       10                       100
    1234567       Item-B             50          1       50                      
    1234567       Item-B             20          2       40                      
    Thank you very much!!!

    Hi,
    Try This.....
    select T0.DocNum ,T1.ItemCode ,T1.Price ,T1.Quantity ,T1.LineNum ,case  when T1.LineNum ='0' then T0.DocTotal else 0 end    from oinv T0 inner join INV1 T1 on T0.DocEntry =T1.DocEntry where T0.DocNum=[%0]
    Thanks
    Shafi
    Edited by: shafi_sunshine on Oct 19, 2011 12:50 PM

  • Custom filed at line item level in order.jsp

    Hi,
    I want to add a custom material number field at the line item level that will search for the item related to the customer material number and populate the order.jsp.
    similar to the below mentioned Standard functionality:-
    In order.jsp when we enter a valid item no in the item text box
    and press enter then the related data of the item is populated in order.jsp.
    Is this possible ??
    If yes please let me know how can we achiese this.

    Satish,
    the problem with product search is that ....
    custommaterial number will be mapped with the item number for different customers in a separate table. so if i place the searc in proucts search tab it will fetch form product master.
    so I was think of extending the process flow and from jsp capture the value entered and trigger action from there make a item search following the standard process.
    but my problem is that I am not able to capture the value entered in the custom field when refresh is clicked?
    can you tell me how is the item search done when we enter the item number and press enter?
    please suggest

  • FI Posting of Invoice at the Line Item Level.

    Hi All
    Client has requirement of posting at the invoice line item level.But standard FI-AR posts at the Invoice Header level.
    E.g If invoice has two line items of $20 and $30 respectively.
    On the standard FI-AR side,one accounting document of $50 will be generated.It will not be posted for each invoice line level.
    In order to post at the invoice line item level,i am looking for a posting user exit from SD side that will two individual account document each having invoice line item amount.Or we can have one FI accountng doc having two invoice line items in that.
    Is there any way we can do this unique type of enhancement in ABAP? and also what is the exact user exit we can use from SD invoice side.
    Regards
    Manjinder

    This is not entirely accurate - if the items are pointing to, say, different profit centers then there will be one posting per profit center. If this cannot be resolved by the standard SD/FI configuration, then the users might need to change their business process. I personally don't see any need to create postings on line item level. Just imagine what it will do to your database size.
    Anyways, you'll find all the user exits here:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/erplo/sdUserexits
    But, again, this sounds like a very bad idea.

  • How to maintain Status at the line item level

    Hi Folks,
    How to maintain the status at the line item level. I could able to find the path in the IMG for Header level. I will be looking forward for the path or the procedure for maintaining the status at the Line item level. Do the needful. Thank you.
    Regards,
    Amrita

    Hi Amrita,
    Goto SPRO>Customer Relationship Management>Transactions>Basic Settings>Define Item Categories, Select your Item category and click on Details. Witin profiles set type Assign Status profile you created against field Status profile.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Chandrakant

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes doesn't recognize iPod

    I'll start out by saying that I've hurled every curse I can imagine out into the inky blackness of space the past four weeks. I've pulled out hair, gnashed teeth, thrown chairs, punched walls, and have almost gone nuclear. I have a laptop. External h

  • HT1462 How do you enable the camera on safari?

    I am trying to partipcate in the smallword50.com sing-a-long for Disneyland's 50th celebration of "It's a Small World", but in order to do so, it keeps telling me to turn the camera on... not sure how to do this lol it might be fairly easy! Ha, I eve

  • Labview program works on one computer, but doesn't on another.

    We have a laptop running a custom data aquisition program that was made with labview by an external company. It communicates via ethernet with a box full of national instruments hardware that is connected to some sensors. While it works fine on the l

  • My ipad mini is say its up to date with 6.1.3 Is io7 available for it yet?

    ANy ideas?

  • Adobe Flash player 10.1

    I have checked the all the security settings for active EX on my 32 bit IE8. When download manager starts doanload it immediately shows "server error" and stops downloading. How can I overcome this problem? Can any body help please? I have also check